Laman pertaruhan premium stake: pengguna baharu boleh guna kod promo FHn2uDc1. Daftar sekarang
Pasaran yang dijejaki vs hasil sepenuh masa
Setiap baris membandingkan model pra-perlawanan lean dengan keputusan sepenuh masa.
- Pasaran Ramalan Hasilnya Hasil
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 matlamat) ✖ tak betul
- Kedua-dua Pasukan Menjaringkan Gol BTTS Tidak Ya ✖ tak betul
- 1X2 AFC Rushden & Diamonds AFC Rushden & Diamonds ✔ Betul
- Cerapan skor tepat 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 2-1 ✔ Betul
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
Pending
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
Pending
Final Result
AFC Rushden & Diamonds win · AFC Rushden & Diamonds 2–1 Braintree
Prediction
✔ Correct
Decision Grade
F
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Taklimat AI untuk perlawanan ini belum tersedia. Selepas naik taraf pelayan, jalankan semula “Batch generate odds” untuk menjana ringkasan.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "a4637b48d85dc1663805c0eb035a44109d2187d74903af64f99e4e9f12ff6b45",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.26,
"away_win_prob": 0.3331,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.455,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2963,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 3.0,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.38,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.7,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.34,
"home_win_prob": 0.3706,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Combo Winner : AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds and +2.5 goals",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "10%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "45%",
"winner_name": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds"
},
"away_xg": 1.26,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": 0.115,
"edge_gap": 0.0371,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.2556,
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 33.3,
"draw": 29.6,
"home": 37.1
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 3.47
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 3.47,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds Win",
"is_value": true,
"label": "Home",
"market_fair_odds": 3.91,
"market_odds": 3.47,
"model_odds": 2.7,
"overround": 12.8,
"prob_edge": 8.2,
"value_pct": 28.5,
"value_rating": "strong_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 1,
"away_failed_to_score": 0,
"away_played": 2,
"away_score_rate": 71.6,
"home_clean_sheet": 1,
"home_failed_to_score": 0,
"home_played": 2,
"home_score_rate": 73.8,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"pick": "No",
"pick_prob": 54.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.26,
"home_expected": 1.34,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 10.0
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.4
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.4
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 7.9
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds or Draw",
"prob": 66.7
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds or Braintree",
"prob": 70.4
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Braintree",
"prob": 62.9
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds or Braintree",
"pick_prob": 70.4
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 33.3,
"draw_pct": 29.6,
"home_pct": 37.1,
"lean_key": "home",
"lean_label": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": "+2.5",
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 3.0,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 3.0,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Under 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 28.7,
"implied_prob": 28.8,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Home",
"market": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds Win",
"model_prob": 37.1,
"odds": 3.47
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Braintree",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 52.16,
"draw": 22.28,
"home": 25.56
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE10",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-10-03 14:05:57",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-10-03 13:47:14",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 25.56,
"gap_pp": 11.5,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 37.05
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 22.28,
"gap_pp": 7.32,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 29.6
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 52.16,
"gap_pp": -18.82,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 33.35
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 60.0,
"gap_pp": -11.8,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 48.2
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 40.0,
"gap_pp": 11.8,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 51.8
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 3.47,
"early": 3.47,
"implied_closing_pct": 25.56,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 25.56,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.98,
"early": 3.98,
"implied_closing_pct": 22.28,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 22.28,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 1.7,
"early": 1.7,
"implied_closing_pct": 52.16,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 52.16,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.52,
"early": 1.52,
"implied_closing_pct": 60.0,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 60.0,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 2.28,
"early": 2.28,
"implied_closing_pct": 40.0,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 40.0,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 11.8,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": 2.1,
"ev": 0.2063,
"has_edge": true,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 9.65,
"market_prob": 0.1036,
"market_prob_pct": 10.4,
"model_prob": 0.125,
"model_prob_pct": 12.5,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"status_key": "positive_edge"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 10.0
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.4
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.4
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 7.9
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.34,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1479,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.29,
"edge": 0.0176,
"edge_pp": 1.8,
"market_prob": 0.399,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2033,
"best_odd": 1.52,
"edge": -0.0242,
"ev": -0.1232,
"implied_prob": 0.601,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5768
},
"p_final": 0.4166,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 11.9,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1862,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0461,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1479,
"best_odd": 2.29,
"edge": 0.0176,
"ev": -0.0461,
"implied_prob": 0.399,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4166
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.2433,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -24.3,
"text": "-24.3%"
},
"ev_under": 0.2328,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 23.3,
"text": "+23.3%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.2328,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 10359.52,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "under"
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1666,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.25,
"edge": 0.0082,
"edge_pp": 0.8,
"market_prob": 0.4055,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1666,
"best_odd": 2.25,
"edge": 0.0082,
"ev": -0.069,
"implied_prob": 0.4055,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4138
},
"p_final": 0.4138,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 4.9,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0237,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.069,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2291,
"best_odd": 1.535,
"edge": -0.0113,
"ev": -0.1049,
"implied_prob": 0.5945,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5831
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.0465,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 4.7,
"text": "+4.7%"
},
"ev_yes": -0.1443,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -14.4,
"text": "-14.4%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.0465,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"sort_key": 10041.85,
"tier": "best",
"value_side": "no",
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "Model and market favour the same side (AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds), but pricing still diverges by 18.9 pp.",
"consensus_odds": 3.47,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": -0.0142,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -1.4,
"text": "-1.4%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.2556,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": -0.0142,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -1.4,
"text": "-1.4%"
},
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"raw_edge_display": "+11.5 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 11.5,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.2856,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+28.6%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds",
"sort_key": 1796.45,
"tier": "bad_ev"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.5,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.5
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "6/8",
"alert_breadth_note": "6/8 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2193 -10.5%",
"alert_team": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 18.9,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -18.85,
"hero_label": "Braintree",
"market_prob_pct": 25.6,
"market_team": "Braintree",
"model_prob_pct": 37.1,
"model_team": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "!",
"status_key": "caution",
"status_label": "Use caution",
"status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
"steam_score": 64,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "A",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "market_disagree",
"read_min": 5,
"title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
"url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 18.9,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 18.9,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds), but pricing still diverges by 18.9 pp."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 18.9,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 18.9,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds), but pricing still diverges by 18.9 pp."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.2328,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.2857,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 4.7,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.7,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 51,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds at 37.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 25.6%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds as the value side (37.0%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 11.5,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.48 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +29% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1641624 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.48 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +23.3% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +23.3% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +23.3% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 4.7/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +23.3% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 4.7/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "64 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "51 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+23.3% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market favour the same side (AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds), but pricing still diverges by 18.9 pp.",
"Decision strength: 4.7/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +29% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 64,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Model and market favour the same side (AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds), but pricing still diverges by 18.9 pp.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.0142,
"consensus_ev_display": "-1.4%",
"consensus_odds": 3.47,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2556,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"raw_edge_display": "+11.5 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 11.5,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.2881844380403458,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.2856,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+28.6%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -0.7,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.08 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.08
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "6/8",
"breadth_ratio": 0.75,
"evidence": {
"score": 68,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Sharp steam supports model side (direction only \u2014 not pricing convergence)",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation warning",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Warning",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "gap",
"label": "Large market gap (19 pp)",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Steam aligns with model",
"tone": "ok"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 15.6,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 7.5,
"steam_coherence": 10.0,
"validation": 14.0
},
"score": 64,
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 18.85,
"market_agreement": "weak",
"max_gap_pp": 18.85,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.26,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -1.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.34,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.34,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.34 \u00b7 Away xG 1.26 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -1%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": false,
"mv_status": "warning",
"odds_delta_pct": -10.5,
"steam_conflicts": false,
"steam_move_display": "\u2193 -10.5%",
"steam_team": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 51,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 42,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 37,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 42,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "Model and market favour the same side (AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds), but pricing still diverges by 18.9 pp.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 18.9,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 18.9,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds), but pricing still diverges by 18.9 pp."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 18.9,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 18.9,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds), but pricing still diverges by 18.9 pp."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.2328,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.2857,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 4.7,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.7,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 51,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds at 37.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 25.6%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds as the value side (37.0%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 11.5,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.48 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +29% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1641624 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.48 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +23.3% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +23.3% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +23.3% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 4.7/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +23.3% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 4.7/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "64 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "51 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+23.3% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market favour the same side (AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds), but pricing still diverges by 18.9 pp.",
"Decision strength: 4.7/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +29% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 64,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Model and market favour the same side (AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds), but pricing still diverges by 18.9 pp.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.0142,
"consensus_ev_display": "-1.4%",
"consensus_odds": 3.47,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2556,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"raw_edge_display": "+11.5 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 11.5,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.2881844380403458,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.2856,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+28.6%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -0.7,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.08 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.08
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "Model and market favour the same side (AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds), but pricing still diverges by 18.9 pp.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds 1.34 xG vs Braintree 1.26 \u2192 AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds 37.1%",
"Market: Braintree ~25.6% implied",
"Market Steam: AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds \u2193 -10.5%"
],
"one_liner": "Model leans AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds, but market pricing diverges by 19 pp.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": 11.5,
"fair_prob": 37.06,
"label": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds",
"market_prob": 25.56,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 7.35,
"fair_prob": 29.63,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 22.28,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": -18.85,
"fair_prob": 33.31,
"label": "Braintree",
"market_prob": 52.16,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": -11.87,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 60.07,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": 11.87,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 39.93,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": -4.92,
"fair_prob": 54.5,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 59.42,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": 4.92,
"fair_prob": 45.5,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 40.58,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -18.85,
"fair_prob_pct": 33.31,
"hero_side": "away",
"hero_team_name": "Braintree",
"market_prob_pct": 52.16,
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE10",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE10.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Braintree\u0027s win probability at 52.2%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 33.3%, a difference of 18.9 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "strong",
"edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 18.85,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "strong",
"divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
"divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
"divergence_tier": "strong",
"edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE10.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Supports model direction",
"positive": true
},
"market_prob_pct": 25.6,
"model_prob_gap_display": "+11.5 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": 11.5,
"model_prob_pct": 37.1,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "+11.5 percentage points",
"gap_pp": 11.5,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
"reliability_icon": "!",
"reliability_score": 64,
"reliability_tier": "limited",
"summary": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds \u2014 market direction supports the model lean.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Warning",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 51,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 42,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 37,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 42,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds 1.34 xG vs Braintree 1.26 \u2192 AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds 37.1%",
"Market: Braintree ~25.6% implied",
"Market Steam: AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds \u2193 -10.5%"
],
"one_liner": "Model leans AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds, but market pricing diverges by 19 pp.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -18.85,
"hero_label": "Braintree",
"hero_side": "away",
"market_activity": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds odds shortened \u2193 -10.5%.",
"market_agreement": "weak",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.",
"Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing."
],
"follow_up": "However, recent buying interest has been on AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds, with odds shortening by 10.5%.",
"gap_tier": "strong",
"lead": "The market is materially more optimistic about Braintree than the current fair estimate.",
"note": "Buying interest on AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds \u2014 odds shortened by 10.5%.",
"paragraphs": [
"The market is materially more optimistic about Braintree than the current fair estimate.",
"However, recent buying interest has been on AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds, with odds shortening by 10.5%.",
"Buying interest on AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds \u2014 odds shortened by 10.5%."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The market favors Braintree more strongly than the current fair estimate.",
"At the same time, AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds has attracted buying interest, with odds shortening by 10.5%.",
"Broad sportsbook alignment (6/8) supports the current market view on AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 18.85,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
"status": "warning"
},
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Top two 1X2 outcomes within 3.8 percentage points."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 3.8,
"max_prob_pct": 37.1,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "strong",
"largest_gap_label": "Braintree",
"largest_gap_pp": -18.9,
"lead": "The closing market prices Braintree higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 18.9,
"title": "Strong Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": 11.5,
"edge_pp": 11.5,
"fair_prob_pct": 37.06,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds",
"market_prob_pct": 25.56,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "model_edge",
"signal_label": "Model Edge"
},
{
"difference_pp": 7.35,
"edge_pp": 7.35,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.63,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 22.28,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "model_higher",
"signal_label": "Model Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": -18.85,
"edge_pp": -18.85,
"fair_prob_pct": 33.31,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Braintree",
"market_prob_pct": 52.16,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
}
],
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "Buying interest on AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds \u2014 odds shortened by 10.5%.",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Braintree (25.6%).",
"However, AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds has attracted one of the strongest multi-book steam moves of the day (\u2193 -10.5%, 6/8).",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds, Market \u2192 Braintree, Recent sharp money \u2192 AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds.",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 58.82,
"closing_odds": 1.7,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 58.82,
"entry_odds": 1.7,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"model_validation_status": "warning",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "PRE10",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 6,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 36,
"bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -12.5%",
"odds_delta_pct": -12.5
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -10.5%",
"odds_delta_pct": -10.5
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -10.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": -10.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -9.8%",
"odds_delta_pct": -9.8
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -9.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": -9.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -8.6%",
"odds_delta_pct": -8.6
}
],
"books_total": 8,
"breadth_display": "6/8",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 3.4,
"is_drift": false,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2193 -10.5%",
"move_pct_abs": 10.5,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 54h 9m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"Multi-book steam on AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds (10.5%, 6/8) \u2014 aligned shortening, not a single-book blip.",
"Sharper sportsbooks initiated a solid move with growing cross-book confirmation."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": -10.5,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"3.80",
"3.60",
"3.40"
],
"display": "4.80 \u2192 3.40 \u2192 3.40",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 54h 9m",
"pick_team": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "4.80"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "3.40"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.40"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
3.8,
3.47,
3.4
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,0.0 28.0,14.8 56.0,18.0",
"sparkline_trend": "down",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way drop",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.80"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "3.40"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "3.80"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.40"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 3.8,
"page_alert_line": "Sharp money alert: AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds \u2193 -10.5% market move detected",
"phase_label": "Sharp repricing",
"phase_tip": "Aggressive adjustment \u2014 often sharp-led or high consensus.",
"pick_team": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "Sharp money alert: AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds \u2193 -10.5% market move detected",
"sharp_leader": "Bet365",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "confirm",
"signal_icon": "\ud83d\udcc8",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 3.4,
"is_drift": false,
"label": "Sharp signal",
"move_display": "\u2193 -10.5%",
"open_odds": 3.8,
"summary": "Sharp money supports the same direction as the model lean.",
"team": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds",
"tone": "with"
},
"signal_key": "market_steam",
"signal_label": "Steam",
"steam_score": 64,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "A",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "6/8",
"current_odds": 3.4,
"move_display": "\u2193 -10.5%",
"open_odds": 3.8,
"pick_team": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds",
"steam_score": 64,
"steam_team_name": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds",
"steam_tier": "A"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 18.9,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "braintree",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Braintree",
"away_team_id": 1831,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/1831.webp",
"away_team_name": "Braintree",
"away_team_public_id": "1uEHmNmKkqQUxR",
"away_team_slug": "braintree",
"country_code": "GB-ENG",
"country_display_name": "England",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/gb-eng.svg",
"country_id": 49,
"country_name": "England",
"fixture_id": 1641624,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "England",
"home_team_display_name": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds",
"home_team_id": 7691,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/7691.webp",
"home_team_name": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds",
"home_team_public_id": "2kfmRJQzBik0Fo",
"home_team_slug": "afc-rushden-diamonds",
"ht.home_team_slug": "afc-rushden-diamonds",
"league_country": "England",
"league_country_display": "England",
"league_display_name": "Piala FA",
"league_id": 45,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/45.webp",
"league_name": "Piala FA",
"league_public_id": "3qBU7du2W45n9v",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-10-03 14:00:00",
"public_id": "34GgPMULs5Gyt1",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": null,
"venue_name": null
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.4307,
"best_odd": 1.7,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.081,
"ev": -0.251,
"implied_prob": 0.5216,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.5216,
"draw": 0.2228,
"home": 0.2556
},
"model_prob": 0.3335,
"p_final": 0.4406
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2671,
"best_odd": 3.98,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0195,
"ev": -0.0354,
"implied_prob": 0.2228,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.5216,
"draw": 0.2228,
"home": 0.2556
},
"model_prob": 0.296,
"p_final": 0.2424
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.2483,
"best_odd": 3.47,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0285,
"ev": -0.0142,
"implied_prob": 0.2556,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.5216,
"draw": 0.2228,
"home": 0.2556
},
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"p_final": 0.2841
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 1.7,
"edge": -0.2548,
"ev": -0.4331,
"implied_prob": 0.5882,
"model_prob": 0.3335
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.98,
"edge": 0.0447,
"ev": 0.178,
"implied_prob": 0.2513,
"model_prob": 0.296
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 3.47,
"edge": 0.0823,
"ev": 0.2857,
"implied_prob": 0.2882,
"model_prob": 0.3705
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.1666,
"alpha_yes": 0.2291,
"best_no_odd": 2.3,
"best_yes_odd": 1.57,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": 0.0492,
"edge_yes": -0.0492,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.0465,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.069,
"ev_yes": -0.1443,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.1049,
"implied_no": 0.4058,
"implied_yes": 0.5942,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1666,
"best_odd": 2.25,
"edge": 0.0082,
"ev": -0.069,
"implied_prob": 0.4055,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4138
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2291,
"best_odd": 1.535,
"edge": -0.0113,
"ev": -0.1049,
"implied_prob": 0.5945,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5831
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"p_final_no": 0.4138,
"p_final_yes": 0.5831,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.2033,
"alpha_under": 0.1479,
"best_over_odd": 1.57,
"best_under_odd": 2.38,
"consensus_over_odd": 1.52,
"consensus_under_odd": 2.29,
"edge_over": -0.1187,
"edge_under": 0.1187,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.2433,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.1232,
"ev_under": 0.2328,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.0461,
"implied_over": 0.6007,
"implied_over_mf": 0.601,
"implied_under": 0.3993,
"implied_under_mf": 0.399,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2033,
"best_odd": 1.52,
"edge": -0.0242,
"ev": -0.1232,
"implied_prob": 0.601,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5768
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1479,
"best_odd": 2.29,
"edge": 0.0176,
"ev": -0.0461,
"implied_prob": 0.399,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4166
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.5768,
"p_final_under": 0.4166,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.2328,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.2857,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.2328,
"confidence": 6.5,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 4.7,
"score_v1_legacy": 6.5,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 6.7,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 4.7,
"score_pre_penalty": 6.7
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 18.9,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 18.9,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds), but pricing still diverges by 18.9 pp."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.2328,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.2857,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 4.7,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.7,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 51,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds at 37.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 25.6%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds as the value side (37.0%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 11.5,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.48 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +29% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1641624 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.48 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +23.3% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +23.3% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +23.3% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 4.7/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +23.3% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 4.7/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "64 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "51 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+23.3% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market favour the same side (AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds), but pricing still diverges by 18.9 pp.",
"Decision strength: 4.7/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +29% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 64,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Model and market favour the same side (AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds), but pricing still diverges by 18.9 pp.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.0142,
"consensus_ev_display": "-1.4%",
"consensus_odds": 3.47,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2556,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"raw_edge_display": "+11.5 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 11.5,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.2881844380403458,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.2856,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+28.6%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -0.7,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.08 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.08
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"draw_prob": 0.296,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.3705,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.08
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 3.47,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": 0.0285,
"ev": -0.0142,
"implied_prob": 0.2556,
"max_ev_side": "home",
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"side": "home",
"side_label": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1666,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.25,
"edge": 0.0082,
"market_prob": 0.4055,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1666,
"best_odd": 2.25,
"edge": 0.0082,
"ev": -0.069,
"implied_prob": 0.4055,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4138
},
"p_final": 0.4138,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.069,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2291,
"best_odd": 1.535,
"edge": -0.0113,
"ev": -0.1049,
"implied_prob": 0.5945,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5831
}
},
"edge": 0.0492,
"ev": 0.0465,
"implied_prob": 0.4058,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"side": "no",
"value_side": "no"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1479,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.29,
"edge": 0.0176,
"market_prob": 0.399,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2033,
"best_odd": 1.52,
"edge": -0.0242,
"ev": -0.1232,
"implied_prob": 0.601,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5768
},
"p_final": 0.4166,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0461,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1479,
"best_odd": 2.29,
"edge": 0.0176,
"ev": -0.0461,
"implied_prob": 0.399,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4166
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"edge": 0.1187,
"ev": 0.2328,
"implied_prob": 0.3993,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"side": "under",
"value_side": "under"
}
},
"match_id": 1641624,
"match_regime": {
"action": "bet",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": true,
"code": "clear_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.2328,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 1.0,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3335,
"draw": 0.296,
"home": 0.3705
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Braintree",
"home": "AFC Rushden \u0026 Diamonds"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.084413,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.2328,
"implied_prob": 0.3993,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"not_dominant": false,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "under",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 2,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.0142,
"consensus_ev_display": "-1.4%",
"consensus_odds": 3.47,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2556,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"raw_edge_display": "+11.5 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 11.5,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.2881844380403458,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.2856,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+28.6%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1641624,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-10-03T14:05:59.447629+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Terokai Kandungan Ramalan Lain
Dapatkan Ramalan Premium untuk AFC Rushden & Diamonds & Braintree!
Buka analisis mendalam, tip pertaruhan eksklusif, dan ramalan perlawanan dengan perkhidmatan langganan premium kami.
Langgan Sekarang
