Statistik / Bola Sepak / Portugal. Taça de Portugal / Sanjoanense vs Pacos de Brandao

Sanjoanense vs Pacos de Brandao Statistics & Analysis

Aug 30, 2026 - 16:00
3 1.27
0 1.33
xG Accuracy: 43%
Laman pertaruhan premium stake: pengguna baharu boleh guna kod promo FHn2uDc1. Daftar sekarang

Pasaran yang dijejaki vs hasil sepenuh masa

Setiap baris membandingkan model pra-perlawanan lean dengan keputusan sepenuh masa.

  • Pasaran Ramalan Hasilnya Hasil
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 matlamat) ✖ tak betul
  • Kedua-dua Pasukan Menjaringkan Gol BTTS Ya Tidak ✖ tak betul
  • 1X2 Pacos de Brandao Sanjoanense ✖ tak betul
  • Cerapan skor tepat 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 3-0 ✖ tak betul

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 24, 2026 · 02:20 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-5300812

Closing Odds 1.47
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Sanjoanense win · Sanjoanense 3–0 Pacos de Brandao
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Intelijen pasaran

Bacaan selepas pilihan utama: bagaimana suapan penutup berprioriti bergerak berbanding model.

Ringkasan pasaran

Pasaran kekal stabil menjelang sepakan. Tiada anjakan implied ketara antara PRE30 dan PRE5 pada snapshot berprioriti.

Walaupun pergerakan lewat kecil, model masih menilai Lukis (1X2),Pacos de Brandao (1X2),Lebih 2.5 gol jauh melebihi implied snapshot penutupan — bacaan statik "model vs harga", bukan kejaran steam.

Model masih melebihi implied penutupan pada Pacos de Brandao (1X2) kira-kira 21.8 mata peratus — isyarat salah harga paling jelas pada halaman ini.

Model vs implied penutup

Pasaran Model % Implied penutup % Jurang (pp)
Sanjoanense (1X2) 33.8 61.1 -27.4
Lukis (1X2) 29.6 24.1 +5.5
Pacos de Brandao (1X2) 36.6 14.8 +21.8
Lebih 2.5 gol 48.2 46.6 +1.6
Bawah 2.5 gol 51.8 53.4 -1.6
Apa maksudnya

Secara ringkas: model kira-kira 36.6% pada Pacos de Brandao (1X2), manakala snapshot penutup menunjukkan kira-kira 14.8%. Bezanya — kira-kira 21.8 mata peratus — ialah jurang model-vs-pasaran terbesar yang ditonjolkan di halaman ini.

Ringkas: "implied penutup" ialah kebarangkalian terbit daripada odds akhir yang ditangkap (selepas de-vig ringkas). "Jurang (pp)" = peratus model tolak implied tersebut, dalam mata peratus (pp).

Pergerakan garisan menjelang sepakan mula

Satu buku prioriti setiap snapshot (bukan semua). Laluan tangkapan: PRE30 → PRE5 · Buku: Pinnacle

Dalam kurungan pada lajur: Penutup = snapshot pertama tersedia ikut PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Awal = pertama dalam PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 yang berbeza daripada Penutup.

Odds terperinci dilipat di bawah — pergerakan implied (de-vig) boleh diabaikan.

Lihat jadual penuh baris demi baris
Pasaran Awal (PRE30) Penutup (PRE5) Δ tersirat (pp)
Sanjoanense (1X2) 1.47 1.47 0.0
Lukis (1X2) 3.73 3.73 0.0
Pacos de Brandao (1X2) 6.09 6.09 0.0
Lebih 2.5 gol 1.99 1.99 0.0
Bawah 2.5 gol 1.74 1.74 0.0

Taklimat AI untuk perlawanan ini belum tersedia. Selepas naik taraf pelayan, jalankan semula “Batch generate odds” untuk menjana ringkasan.

View technical JSON
{
  "bundle_version": 1,
  "content_hash": "163a0cee824946956a59739d1e175fd1e9f31f3c9e0f9ffd6f20b8245ec2b564",
  "decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
  "facts": {
    "ai_fp": {
      "away_predicted_xg": 1.33,
      "away_win_prob": 0.3659,
      "away_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "bayes_applied": 0,
      "btts_no_prob": 0.455,
      "btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
      "dc_rho": -0.13,
      "draw_prob": 0.2964,
      "draw_prob_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_away": 2.73,
      "fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_draw": 3.37,
      "fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_home": 2.96,
      "fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
      "home_predicted_xg": 1.27,
      "home_win_prob": 0.3377,
      "home_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "over_25_prob": 0.482,
      "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
      "under_25_prob": 0.518
    },
    "api_prediction": {
      "advice": "No predictions available",
      "main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
      "percent_away": "33%",
      "percent_draw": "33%",
      "percent_home": "33%",
      "winner_name": null
    },
    "away_xg": 1.33,
    "betting_insight": {
      "bet_label": "Pacos de Brandao",
      "confidence": null,
      "main_pick_meta": {
        "confidence": "low",
        "display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
        "edge": 0.2184,
        "edge_gap": 0.0284,
        "market": "1X2",
        "market_prob": 0.1476,
        "model_prob": 0.366,
        "pick_type": "no_strong",
        "probabilities": {
          "away": 36.6,
          "draw": 29.6,
          "home": 33.8
        },
        "reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
        "selection": null,
        "selection_name": null
      },
      "market_comparison": [
        {
          "affi_link": "",
          "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
          "odd": 6.09
        }
      ],
      "risk_color": null,
      "risk_key": null,
      "stacked_market": null,
      "value_bet": {
        "best_odds": 6.09,
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "display_market": "Pacos de Brandao Win",
        "is_value": false,
        "label": "Away",
        "market_fair_odds": 6.78,
        "market_odds": 6.09,
        "model_odds": 2.73,
        "overround": 11.3,
        "prob_edge": 20.2,
        "value_pct": 123.1,
        "value_rating": "no_value"
      }
    },
    "betting_markets": {
      "btts": {
        "away_clean_sheet": 0,
        "away_failed_to_score": 0,
        "away_played": 0,
        "away_score_rate": 73.6,
        "home_clean_sheet": 0,
        "home_failed_to_score": 0,
        "home_played": 0,
        "home_score_rate": 71.9,
        "no_prob": 45.5,
        "pick": "Yes",
        "pick_prob": 54.5,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": false,
        "yes_prob": 54.5
      },
      "correct_score": {
        "away_expected": 1.33,
        "home_expected": 1.27,
        "scores": [
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-1",
            "prob": 12.5
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 0,
            "label": "0-1",
            "prob": 9.9
          },
          {
            "away": 0,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-0",
            "prob": 9.4
          },
          {
            "away": 2,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-2",
            "prob": 8.3
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 2,
            "label": "2-1",
            "prob": 8.0
          }
        ],
        "source": "xG"
      },
      "double_chance": {
        "options": [
          {
            "key": "1X",
            "label": "Sanjoanense or Draw",
            "prob": 63.4
          },
          {
            "key": "12",
            "label": "Sanjoanense or Pacos de Brandao",
            "prob": 70.4
          },
          {
            "key": "X2",
            "label": "Draw or Pacos de Brandao",
            "prob": 66.2
          }
        ],
        "pick_key": "12",
        "pick_label": "Sanjoanense or Pacos de Brandao",
        "pick_prob": 70.4
      },
      "match_winner": {
        "away_pct": 36.6,
        "draw_pct": 29.6,
        "home_pct": 33.8,
        "lean_key": "away",
        "lean_label": "Pacos de Brandao"
      },
      "over_under": {
        "api_hint": null,
        "avg_total": 2.6,
        "away_avg_scored": 0.0,
        "confidence": "low",
        "home_avg_scored": 0.0,
        "over_prob": 48.2,
        "pick": "Under 2.5",
        "pick_prob": 51.8,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": false,
        "total_expected": 2.6,
        "under_prob": 51.8
      },
      "prob_source": "poisson",
      "value_bet_enhanced": {
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "edge": 123.1,
        "implied_prob": 16.4,
        "is_value": false,
        "label": "Away",
        "market": "Pacos de Brandao Win",
        "model_prob": 36.6,
        "odds": 6.09
      }
    },
    "closing_line_bundle": {
      "away_team": "Pacos de Brandao",
      "closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
        "away": 14.76,
        "draw": 24.1,
        "home": 61.14
      },
      "closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "closing_capture": "PRE5",
      "closing_fetched_at": "2026-08-30 15:59:41",
      "early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "early_capture": "PRE30",
      "early_fetched_at": "2026-08-30 15:36:22",
      "has_data": true,
      "home_team": "Sanjoanense",
      "largest_move_kind": null,
      "max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
      "model_vs_closing": [
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 61.14,
          "gap_pp": -27.39,
          "kind": "1x2_h",
          "model_pct": 33.75
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 24.1,
          "gap_pp": 5.55,
          "kind": "1x2_d",
          "model_pct": 29.65
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 14.76,
          "gap_pp": 21.84,
          "kind": "1x2_a",
          "model_pct": 36.6
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 46.65,
          "gap_pp": 1.55,
          "kind": "ou_o",
          "model_pct": 48.2
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 53.35,
          "gap_pp": -1.55,
          "kind": "ou_u",
          "model_pct": 51.8
        }
      ],
      "movement": [
        {
          "closing": 1.47,
          "early": 1.47,
          "implied_closing_pct": 61.14,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 61.14,
          "kind": "1x2_h"
        },
        {
          "closing": 3.73,
          "early": 3.73,
          "implied_closing_pct": 24.1,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 24.1,
          "kind": "1x2_d"
        },
        {
          "closing": 6.09,
          "early": 6.09,
          "implied_closing_pct": 14.76,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 14.76,
          "kind": "1x2_a"
        },
        {
          "closing": 1.99,
          "early": 1.99,
          "implied_closing_pct": 46.65,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 46.65,
          "kind": "ou_o"
        },
        {
          "closing": 1.74,
          "early": 1.74,
          "implied_closing_pct": 53.35,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 53.35,
          "kind": "ou_u"
        }
      ],
      "movement_negligible": true,
      "same_bookmaker": true,
      "top_value_gap": {
        "gap_pp": 21.8,
        "kind": "1x2_a"
      }
    },
    "correct_score_insight": {
      "best_value": null,
      "lean_card": {
        "diff_pp": -0.8,
        "ev": -0.0625,
        "has_edge": false,
        "label": "1-1",
        "market_odds": 7.5,
        "market_prob": 0.1333,
        "market_prob_pct": 13.3,
        "model_prob": 0.125,
        "model_prob_pct": 12.5,
        "n_bookmakers": 2,
        "status_key": "no_value"
      },
      "most_likely": {
        "label": "1-1",
        "prob": 12.5
      },
      "top5": [
        {
          "label": "1-1",
          "prob": 12.5
        },
        {
          "label": "0-1",
          "prob": 9.9
        },
        {
          "label": "1-0",
          "prob": 9.4
        },
        {
          "label": "1-2",
          "prob": 8.3
        },
        {
          "label": "2-1",
          "prob": 8.0
        }
      ]
    },
    "home_xg": 1.27,
    "homepage_pick": null,
    "market_cards": [
      {
        "authority_action": "wait",
        "authority_note": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
        "consensus_odds": 6.09,
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "disagreement_label": "Strong",
        "disagreement_level": "strong",
        "ev": 0.0777,
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 7.8,
          "text": "+7.8%"
        },
        "featured": true,
        "id": "1x2",
        "implied_prob": 0.1476,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "max_ev": 0.0777,
        "max_ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 7.8,
          "text": "+7.8%"
        },
        "model_prob": 0.366,
        "raw_edge_display": "+21.8 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 21.8,
        "raw_signal_ev": 1.2289,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+122.9%",
        "show_primary_label": false,
        "side_label": "Pacos de Brandao",
        "sort_key": 10219.93,
        "tier": "best"
      },
      {
        "decision": "lean",
        "decision_layer": {
          "available": false
        },
        "ev_available": false,
        "ev_no": null,
        "ev_no_display": null,
        "ev_yes": null,
        "ev_yes_display": null,
        "featured": false,
        "id": "btts",
        "max_ev": null,
        "n_bookmakers": 0,
        "no_prob": 45.5,
        "sort_key": 4050.0,
        "tier": "lean",
        "value_side": "yes",
        "yes_prob": 54.5
      },
      {
        "decision": "no_bet",
        "decision_layer": {
          "available": false
        },
        "ev_available": false,
        "ev_over": null,
        "ev_over_display": null,
        "ev_under": null,
        "ev_under_display": null,
        "featured": false,
        "id": "ou_2_5",
        "max_ev": null,
        "n_bookmakers": 0,
        "over_prob": 48.2,
        "sort_key": 2050.0,
        "tier": "pass",
        "under_prob": 51.8,
        "value_side": "under"
      },
      {
        "featured": false,
        "id": "correct_score",
        "sort_key": 817.5,
        "tier": "risk",
        "top_label": "1-1",
        "top_prob": 12.5
      }
    ],
    "market_intelligence": {
      "betting_signal": {
        "alert_breadth": "",
        "alert_breadth_note": "",
        "alert_move": "",
        "alert_team": "",
        "alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
        "divergence_pp": 27.4,
        "has_alert": false,
        "hero_edge_pp": -27.37,
        "hero_label": "Sanjoanense",
        "market_prob_pct": 14.8,
        "market_team": "Sanjoanense",
        "model_prob_pct": 36.6,
        "model_team": "Pacos de Brandao",
        "show": true,
        "status_icon": "!",
        "status_key": "caution",
        "status_label": "Use caution",
        "status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
        "steam_score": null,
        "steam_subtitle": "",
        "steam_tier": "",
        "title": "Betting Signal"
      },
      "decision_chain": {
        "academy_links": [
          {
            "key": "market_disagree",
            "read_min": 5,
            "title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
            "url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "steam",
            "read_min": 4,
            "title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
            "url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "clv_pending",
            "read_min": 3,
            "title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
            "url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
          }
        ],
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": false,
          "direction_key": "conflict",
          "gap_pp": 27.4,
          "key": "conflict",
          "label": "Disagree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": false,
          "pricing_key": "low",
          "probability_gap_pp": 27.4,
          "summary": "The market has repriced Sanjoanense, but the model still strongly favours Pacos de Brandao."
        },
        "authority": {
          "action": "wait",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": false,
            "direction_key": "conflict",
            "gap_pp": 27.4,
            "key": "conflict",
            "label": "Disagree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": false,
            "pricing_key": "low",
            "probability_gap_pp": 27.4,
            "summary": "The market has repriced Sanjoanense, but the model still strongly favours Pacos de Brandao."
          },
          "alignment_key": "conflict",
          "best_consensus_ev": 0.0777,
          "best_outlier_ev": 0.012287999999999999,
          "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
          "decision_strength": 3.0,
          "decision_strength_v1": 3.0,
          "decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
          "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
          "execution_confidence": 16,
          "extreme_disagreement": false,
          "final_verdict_audit": {
            "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
            "action_label": "Action",
            "decision": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
            "is_primary": false,
            "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Pacos de Brandao at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 14.8%.",
            "why": [
              {
                "text": "Decision Model identifies Pacos de Brandao as the value side (36.6%)",
                "tone": "ok"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
                "tone": "bad"
              }
            ],
            "why_label": "Decision Summary"
          },
          "gap_pp": 21.8,
          "gates_failed": [
            "Reliability below 65"
          ],
          "has_top_pick": true,
          "headline": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
          "hero_mode": "default",
          "icon": "\u23f8",
          "label": "Wait for validation",
          "market_signal": "The market has repriced Sanjoanense, but the model still strongly favours Pacos de Brandao.",
          "model_conflict_detail": null,
          "model_lean": "Pacos de Brandao",
          "no_primary_reasons": {
            "all_triggered": [
              "market_conflict",
              "market_quality",
              "calibration_risk"
            ],
            "calibration_mode": "soft",
            "codes": [
              "market_conflict",
              "market_quality"
            ],
            "label": "Reason",
            "other_factors": [
              {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              }
            ],
            "other_label": "Other factors",
            "primary": {
              "code": "market_conflict",
              "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
              "name": "Market Conflict",
              "short": "Market Conflict",
              "subtype": "probability_gap",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "secondary": {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "version": "v1"
          },
          "outlier_detected": false,
          "outlier_excluded_panel": "",
          "primary_allowed": false,
          "primary_block_explain": {
            "entries": [
              {
                "key": "positive_ev",
                "label": "Consensus EV +7.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                "ok": true
              },
              {
                "key": "gate",
                "label": "Reliability below 65",
                "ok": false
              }
            ],
            "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
            "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
            "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
            "title": "Why not Primary?"
          },
          "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +7.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
          "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +7.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
          "primary_gates": {
            "items": [
              {
                "key": "extreme_gap",
                "label": "Extreme gap",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "no"
              },
              {
                "key": "xg_calibration",
                "label": "xG calibration",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "warning"
              },
              {
                "key": "reliability",
                "label": "Rel",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "57 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "execution",
                "label": "Exec",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "16 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "alignment",
                "label": "Align",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "conflict"
              },
              {
                "key": "consensus_ev",
                "label": "ConsEV",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "+7.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
              },
              {
                "key": "top_pick",
                "label": "Pick",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              },
              {
                "key": "validation",
                "label": "Validation",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "false"
              }
            ],
            "passed": 4,
            "total": 8
          },
          "primary_type": null,
          "reasons": [
            "The market has repriced Sanjoanense, but the model still strongly favours Pacos de Brandao.",
            "Decision strength: 3.0/10",
            "Reliability below 65"
          ],
          "reliability_score": 57,
          "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
          "strength_v2_breakdown": [
            "Base decision score (v1)",
            "Market steam conflicts with model",
            "Consensus-line +EV",
            "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
          ],
          "subline": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
          "thresholds": {
            "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
            "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
            "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
            "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
            "min_execution": 65,
            "min_reliability": 65,
            "min_strength": 7.0,
            "source": "db",
            "user_id": 2
          },
          "thresholds_source": "db",
          "thresholds_user_id": 2,
          "tier": "wait",
          "validation_ok": false,
          "value_context": {
            "consensus_ev": 0.0777,
            "consensus_ev_display": "+7.8%",
            "consensus_odds": 6.09,
            "disagreement_label": "Strong",
            "disagreement_level": "strong",
            "implied_prob": 0.1476,
            "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
            "model_prob": 0.366,
            "raw_edge_display": "+21.8 percentage points",
            "raw_edge_pp": 21.8,
            "raw_implied_prob": 0.16420361247947454,
            "raw_signal_ev": 1.2289,
            "raw_signal_ev_display": "+122.9%"
          },
          "version": "v2.5",
          "xg_calibration": {
            "block_value_alert": true,
            "calibration_status": "warning",
            "deviation_pct": -1.5,
            "reasons": [
              "Low xG separation gap=0.06 (noise / no edge)"
            ],
            "recommended_action": "monitor",
            "strength_delta": -2.0,
            "uplift_away": null,
            "uplift_home": null,
            "xg_separation": {
              "band": "flat",
              "block_value_alert": true,
              "separation_score": -20,
              "strength_delta": -2.0,
              "xg_gap": 0.06
            }
          }
        },
        "bet_status": "wait",
        "books_breadth_display": "4/4",
        "breadth_ratio": 1.0,
        "evidence": {
          "score": 40,
          "signals": [
            {
              "icon": "\u25cb",
              "key": "statistical_edge",
              "label": "No strong statistical edge",
              "status": "neutral"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "market_agreement",
              "label": "Recent market move conflicts with the model favourite",
              "status": "caution"
            },
            {
              "icon": "\u25cb",
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Sharp steam detected",
              "status": "neutral"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation warning",
              "status": "caution"
            }
          ],
          "stars": 2,
          "tier": "low",
          "tier_label": "Low"
        },
        "forecast_reliability": {
          "breakdown": [
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation: Warning",
              "tone": "caution"
            },
            {
              "key": "gap",
              "label": "Large market gap (27 pp)",
              "tone": "caution"
            }
          ],
          "parts": {
            "alignment": 11.3,
            "data_quality": 12.0,
            "market_coverage": 10.0,
            "steam_coherence": 5.0,
            "validation": 14.0
          },
          "score": 57,
          "stars": 2,
          "tier": "moderate",
          "tier_label": "Moderate"
        },
        "lean_gap_pp": 27.37,
        "market_agreement": "weak",
        "max_gap_pp": 27.37,
        "model_calibration": {
          "away_xg": 1.33,
          "calibration_status": "ok",
          "deviation_pct": -1.0,
          "elevated": false,
          "home_xg": 1.27,
          "impact_note": "",
          "league_avg_xg": 1.35,
          "peak_xg": 1.33,
          "status_label": "Within typical league range",
          "summary": "Home xG 1.27 \u00b7 Away xG 1.33 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -1%",
          "title": "Model Calibration Check"
        },
        "move_is_drift": false,
        "mv_status": "warning",
        "odds_delta_pct": 0.0,
        "steam_conflicts": null,
        "steam_move_display": "+0.0%",
        "steam_team": "Sanjoanense",
        "suppress_execution": true,
        "value_split": {
          "execution_confidence": {
            "label": "Monitoring Confidence",
            "score": 16,
            "tier": "not_reliable",
            "tier_label": "Not reliable"
          },
          "market_compatibility": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 0,
            "tier": "not_reliable",
            "tier_label": "Not reliable"
          },
          "model_edge_strength": {
            "label": "Model Signal Strength",
            "score": 42,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "model_value": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 0,
            "tier": "not_reliable",
            "tier_label": "Not reliable"
          },
          "recommendation": {
            "action": "wait",
            "label": "Wait - No Primary Bet"
          }
        },
        "verdict": {
          "agree_note": "The market has repriced Sanjoanense, but the model still strongly favours Pacos de Brandao.",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": false,
            "direction_key": "conflict",
            "gap_pp": 27.4,
            "key": "conflict",
            "label": "Disagree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": false,
            "pricing_key": "low",
            "probability_gap_pp": 27.4,
            "summary": "The market has repriced Sanjoanense, but the model still strongly favours Pacos de Brandao."
          },
          "authority": {
            "action": "wait",
            "alignment": {
              "direction_aligned": false,
              "direction_key": "conflict",
              "gap_pp": 27.4,
              "key": "conflict",
              "label": "Disagree",
              "model_strong": false,
              "pricing_aligned": false,
              "pricing_key": "low",
              "probability_gap_pp": 27.4,
              "summary": "The market has repriced Sanjoanense, but the model still strongly favours Pacos de Brandao."
            },
            "alignment_key": "conflict",
            "best_consensus_ev": 0.0777,
            "best_outlier_ev": 0.012287999999999999,
            "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
            "decision_strength": 3.0,
            "decision_strength_v1": 3.0,
            "decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
            "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
            "execution_confidence": 16,
            "extreme_disagreement": false,
            "final_verdict_audit": {
              "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
              "action_label": "Action",
              "decision": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
              "is_primary": false,
              "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Pacos de Brandao at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 14.8%.",
              "why": [
                {
                  "text": "Decision Model identifies Pacos de Brandao as the value side (36.6%)",
                  "tone": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
                  "tone": "bad"
                }
              ],
              "why_label": "Decision Summary"
            },
            "gap_pp": 21.8,
            "gates_failed": [
              "Reliability below 65"
            ],
            "has_top_pick": true,
            "headline": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
            "hero_mode": "default",
            "icon": "\u23f8",
            "label": "Wait for validation",
            "market_signal": "The market has repriced Sanjoanense, but the model still strongly favours Pacos de Brandao.",
            "model_conflict_detail": null,
            "model_lean": "Pacos de Brandao",
            "no_primary_reasons": {
              "all_triggered": [
                "market_conflict",
                "market_quality",
                "calibration_risk"
              ],
              "calibration_mode": "soft",
              "codes": [
                "market_conflict",
                "market_quality"
              ],
              "label": "Reason",
              "other_factors": [
                {
                  "code": "market_quality",
                  "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                  "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                  "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                  "tone": "warn"
                }
              ],
              "other_label": "Other factors",
              "primary": {
                "code": "market_conflict",
                "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
                "name": "Market Conflict",
                "short": "Market Conflict",
                "subtype": "probability_gap",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "secondary": {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "version": "v1"
            },
            "outlier_detected": false,
            "outlier_excluded_panel": "",
            "primary_allowed": false,
            "primary_block_explain": {
              "entries": [
                {
                  "key": "positive_ev",
                  "label": "Consensus EV +7.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                  "ok": true
                },
                {
                  "key": "gate",
                  "label": "Reliability below 65",
                  "ok": false
                }
              ],
              "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
              "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
              "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
              "title": "Why not Primary?"
            },
            "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +7.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
            "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +7.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
            "primary_gates": {
              "items": [
                {
                  "key": "extreme_gap",
                  "label": "Extreme gap",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "no"
                },
                {
                  "key": "xg_calibration",
                  "label": "xG calibration",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "warning"
                },
                {
                  "key": "reliability",
                  "label": "Rel",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "57 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "execution",
                  "label": "Exec",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "16 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "alignment",
                  "label": "Align",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "conflict"
                },
                {
                  "key": "consensus_ev",
                  "label": "ConsEV",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "+7.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "top_pick",
                  "label": "Pick",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                },
                {
                  "key": "validation",
                  "label": "Validation",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "false"
                }
              ],
              "passed": 4,
              "total": 8
            },
            "primary_type": null,
            "reasons": [
              "The market has repriced Sanjoanense, but the model still strongly favours Pacos de Brandao.",
              "Decision strength: 3.0/10",
              "Reliability below 65"
            ],
            "reliability_score": 57,
            "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
            "strength_v2_breakdown": [
              "Base decision score (v1)",
              "Market steam conflicts with model",
              "Consensus-line +EV",
              "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
            ],
            "subline": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
            "thresholds": {
              "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
              "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
              "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
              "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
              "min_execution": 65,
              "min_reliability": 65,
              "min_strength": 7.0,
              "source": "db",
              "user_id": 2
            },
            "thresholds_source": "db",
            "thresholds_user_id": 2,
            "tier": "wait",
            "validation_ok": false,
            "value_context": {
              "consensus_ev": 0.0777,
              "consensus_ev_display": "+7.8%",
              "consensus_odds": 6.09,
              "disagreement_label": "Strong",
              "disagreement_level": "strong",
              "implied_prob": 0.1476,
              "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
              "model_prob": 0.366,
              "raw_edge_display": "+21.8 percentage points",
              "raw_edge_pp": 21.8,
              "raw_implied_prob": 0.16420361247947454,
              "raw_signal_ev": 1.2289,
              "raw_signal_ev_display": "+122.9%"
            },
            "version": "v2.5",
            "xg_calibration": {
              "block_value_alert": true,
              "calibration_status": "warning",
              "deviation_pct": -1.5,
              "reasons": [
                "Low xG separation gap=0.06 (noise / no edge)"
              ],
              "recommended_action": "monitor",
              "strength_delta": -2.0,
              "uplift_away": null,
              "uplift_home": null,
              "xg_separation": {
                "band": "flat",
                "block_value_alert": true,
                "separation_score": -20,
                "strength_delta": -2.0,
                "xg_gap": 0.06
              }
            }
          },
          "headline": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
          "icon": "\u23f8",
          "label": "Wait for validation",
          "subline": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
          "tier": "wait"
        },
        "why": {
          "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
          "bullets": [
            "Model: Sanjoanense 1.27 xG vs Pacos de Brandao 1.33 \u2192 Pacos de Brandao 36.6%",
            "Market: Sanjoanense ~14.8% implied",
            "Market Steam: Sanjoanense +0.0%"
          ],
          "one_liner": "Model leans Pacos de Brandao, but market pricing diverges by 27 pp.",
          "title": "Why?"
        }
      },
      "edge_rows": [
        {
          "edge_pp": -27.37,
          "fair_prob": 33.77,
          "label": "Sanjoanense",
          "market_prob": 61.14,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "home"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 5.54,
          "fair_prob": 29.64,
          "label": "Draw",
          "market_prob": 24.1,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "draw"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 21.83,
          "fair_prob": 36.59,
          "label": "Pacos de Brandao",
          "market_prob": 14.76,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "away"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 48.2,
          "label": "Over 2.5",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "over"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 51.8,
          "label": "Under 2.5",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "under"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 54.5,
          "label": "BTTS Yes",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "yes"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 45.5,
          "label": "BTTS No",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "no"
        }
      ],
      "edge_snapshot": {
        "edge_label": "extreme_disagreement",
        "edge_pp": -27.37,
        "fair_prob_pct": 33.77,
        "hero_side": "home",
        "hero_team_name": "Sanjoanense",
        "market_prob_pct": 61.14,
        "status": "strong_market_ahead",
        "steam_team_name": "Sanjoanense"
      },
      "fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
      "fair_vs_market": {
        "closing_capture": "PRE5",
        "closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE5.",
        "comparison_available": true,
        "comparison_disabled": false,
        "comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Sanjoanense\u0027s win probability at 61.1%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 33.8%, a difference of 27.4 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
        "degraded_note": "",
        "divergence_guard": {
          "divergence_level": "extreme",
          "edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
          "max_gap_pp": 27.37,
          "suppress_hero": false,
          "suppress_value_language": true
        },
        "divergence_label": "Extreme model-market divergence",
        "divergence_level": "extreme",
        "divergence_level_label": "Extreme divergence",
        "divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs substantially from current market pricing. Large divergences can occur when rating inputs are incomplete, team-strength estimates are uncertain, or the market incorporates information not present in the model. Interpret with caution.",
        "divergence_tier": "extreme",
        "edge_label": "Extreme disagreement",
        "edge_label_key": "extreme_disagreement",
        "fair_confidence": "medium",
        "fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
        "fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE5.",
        "forecast_assessment": {
          "favourite_class": "Balanced match",
          "favourite_label": "Pacos de Brandao",
          "forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
          "headline": "Balanced match",
          "market_agreement_label": "Weak",
          "market_direction": {
            "label": "Conflicts with model",
            "positive": false
          },
          "market_prob_pct": 14.8,
          "model_prob_gap_display": "+21.8 percentage points",
          "model_prob_gap_pp": 21.8,
          "model_prob_pct": 36.6,
          "outcome_separation_tier": "low",
          "paragraphs": [],
          "pricing_convergence": {
            "gap_display": "+21.8 percentage points",
            "gap_pp": 21.8,
            "label": "Low convergence",
            "label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_low"
          },
          "reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
          "reliability_icon": "!",
          "reliability_score": 57,
          "reliability_tier": "limited",
          "summary": "The market has repriced Sanjoanense, but the model still strongly favours Pacos de Brandao. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
          "tier": "balanced",
          "title": "Prediction Assessment",
          "validation_label": "Warning",
          "value_split": {
            "execution_confidence": {
              "label": "Monitoring Confidence",
              "score": 16,
              "tier": "not_reliable",
              "tier_label": "Not reliable"
            },
            "market_compatibility": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 0,
              "tier": "not_reliable",
              "tier_label": "Not reliable"
            },
            "model_edge_strength": {
              "label": "Model Signal Strength",
              "score": 42,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "model_value": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 0,
              "tier": "not_reliable",
              "tier_label": "Not reliable"
            },
            "recommendation": {
              "action": "wait",
              "label": "Wait - No Primary Bet"
            }
          },
          "why": {
            "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
            "bullets": [
              "Model: Sanjoanense 1.27 xG vs Pacos de Brandao 1.33 \u2192 Pacos de Brandao 36.6%",
              "Market: Sanjoanense ~14.8% implied",
              "Market Steam: Sanjoanense +0.0%"
            ],
            "one_liner": "Model leans Pacos de Brandao, but market pricing diverges by 27 pp.",
            "title": "Why?"
          }
        },
        "forecast_certainty": {
          "note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
          "tier": "low",
          "tier_label": "Low"
        },
        "forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
        "has_market_probs": true,
        "hero_edge_pp": -27.37,
        "hero_label": "Sanjoanense",
        "hero_side": "home",
        "market_activity": "No meaningful directional movement yet.",
        "market_agreement": "weak",
        "market_agreement_label": "Weak",
        "market_interpretation": {},
        "market_narrative": {},
        "market_source": "closing_1x2",
        "max_gap_pp": 27.37,
        "model_validation": {
          "score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
          "status": "warning"
        },
        "model_validation_label": "Warning",
        "outcome_separation": {
          "breakdown": [
            "No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
            "Top two 1X2 outcomes within 2.8 percentage points."
          ],
          "lead_gap_pp": 2.8,
          "max_prob_pct": 36.6,
          "note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
          "tier": "low",
          "tier_label": "Low"
        },
        "outcome_separation_label": "Low",
        "overall_assessment": {
          "badge_class": "extreme",
          "largest_gap_label": "Sanjoanense",
          "largest_gap_pp": -27.4,
          "lead": "The closing market prices Sanjoanense higher than the statistical model.",
          "level": "extreme",
          "max_gap_pp": 27.4,
          "title": "Strong Disagreement"
        },
        "rows": [
          {
            "difference_pp": -27.37,
            "edge_pp": -27.37,
            "fair_prob_pct": 33.77,
            "is_hero": true,
            "label": "Sanjoanense",
            "market_prob_pct": 61.14,
            "side": "home",
            "signal_key": "market_higher",
            "signal_label": "Market Higher"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": 5.54,
            "edge_pp": 5.54,
            "fair_prob_pct": 29.64,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Draw",
            "market_prob_pct": 24.1,
            "side": "draw",
            "signal_key": "model_higher",
            "signal_label": "Model Higher"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": 21.83,
            "edge_pp": 21.83,
            "fair_prob_pct": 36.59,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Pacos de Brandao",
            "market_prob_pct": 14.76,
            "side": "away",
            "signal_key": "model_edge",
            "signal_label": "Model Edge"
          }
        ],
        "status": "strong_market_ahead",
        "status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
        "steam_note": "",
        "unavailable_note": ""
      },
      "interpretation": {
        "has_conflict": true,
        "paragraphs": [
          "The betting market strongly prefers Sanjoanense (14.8%).",
          "This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Pacos de Brandao, Market \u2192 Sanjoanense, Recent sharp money \u2192 recent line movement.",
          "Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
        ],
        "show": true,
        "title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
      },
      "lifecycle": {
        "closing_implied_pct": 68.03,
        "closing_odds": 1.47,
        "closing_reason": "",
        "closing_status": "recorded",
        "closing_status_label": "Recorded",
        "clv_pending": true,
        "clv_pp": 0.0,
        "clv_reason": "",
        "clv_status": "pending",
        "context": "match",
        "current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
        "current_stage_detail": "",
        "current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
        "entry_implied_pct": 68.03,
        "entry_odds": 1.47,
        "match_phase": "upcoming",
        "match_phase_detail": "",
        "match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
        "match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
        "model_validation_label": "Warning",
        "model_validation_status": "warning",
        "stages": [
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "forecast_generated",
            "label": "Prediction Generated",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "market_detected",
            "label": "Market Compared",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "model_validated",
            "label": "Validation Passed",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "PRE5",
            "id": "closing_recorded",
            "label": "Closing Recorded",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "clv_evaluated",
            "label": "CLV Evaluated",
            "status": "pending"
          }
        ]
      },
      "market_move_intelligence": {
        "show": false
      },
      "market_overview": {
        "breadth_display": "4/4",
        "current_odds": 1.45,
        "move_display": "+0.0%",
        "open_odds": 1.45,
        "pick_team": "Sanjoanense",
        "steam_score": 40,
        "steam_team_name": "Sanjoanense",
        "steam_tier": "B"
      },
      "premium_teaser": {
        "current_divergence_pp": 27.4,
        "divergence_label": "Current divergence",
        "title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
        "unlock_items": [
          "Historical similar matches",
          "Closing odds analysis",
          "CLV tracking",
          "Sharp money signals",
          "Market efficiency rating",
          "Historical model vs market results"
        ],
        "unlock_label": "Unlock"
      },
      "show": true
    },
    "match": {
      "away_expected_goals": null,
      "away_goal_display": null,
      "away_team_display_name": "Pacos de Brandao",
      "away_team_id": 28136,
      "away_team_logo": null,
      "away_team_name": "Pacos de Brandao",
      "away_team_public_id": "3XqfhLNxk4oiyo",
      "away_team_slug": null,
      "country_code": "PT",
      "country_display_name": "Portugal",
      "country_flag": "/static/images/country/pt.svg",
      "country_id": 129,
      "country_name": "Portugal",
      "fixture_id": 1619896,
      "goals_away": null,
      "goals_home": null,
      "home_expected_goals": null,
      "home_goal_display": null,
      "home_team_country": "Portugal",
      "home_team_display_name": "Sanjoanense",
      "home_team_id": 4792,
      "home_team_logo": "/static/teams/4792.webp",
      "home_team_name": "Sanjoanense",
      "home_team_public_id": "2ewdSoc9m3zJUZ",
      "home_team_slug": "sanjoanense",
      "league_country": "Portugal",
      "league_country_display": "Portugal",
      "league_display_name": "Ta\u00e7a de Portugal",
      "league_id": 96,
      "league_logo": "/static/leagues/96.webp",
      "league_name": "Ta\u00e7a de Portugal",
      "league_public_id": "4oKCJGgrw8ZxtX",
      "league_season": 2026,
      "match_date": "2026-08-30 16:00:00",
      "public_id": "3K8c2suLgAWwq3",
      "score_fulltime_away": null,
      "score_fulltime_home": null,
      "score_penalty_away": null,
      "score_penalty_home": null,
      "status_long": "Not Started",
      "status_short": "NS",
      "venue_city": null,
      "venue_name": null
    },
    "match_decision": {
      "confidence": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
          "pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
          "pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
          "Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
          "At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
        ],
        "score": 6.0
      },
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
          "away": {
            "alpha": 0.1345,
            "best_odd": 6.09,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.0294,
            "ev": 0.0777,
            "implied_prob": 0.1476,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.1476,
              "draw": 0.241,
              "home": 0.6114
            },
            "model_prob": 0.366,
            "p_final": 0.177
          },
          "draw": {
            "alpha": 0.275,
            "best_odd": 3.73,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.0153,
            "ev": -0.0442,
            "implied_prob": 0.241,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.1476,
              "draw": 0.241,
              "home": 0.6114
            },
            "model_prob": 0.2965,
            "p_final": 0.2562
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "alpha": 0.3535,
            "best_odd": 1.47,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.0968,
            "ev": -0.2435,
            "implied_prob": 0.6114,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.1476,
              "draw": 0.241,
              "home": 0.6114
            },
            "model_prob": 0.3375,
            "p_final": 0.5146
          }
        },
        "1x2_outlier": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
          "away": {
            "best_odd": 6.09,
            "edge": 0.2018,
            "ev": 1.2288,
            "implied_prob": 0.1642,
            "model_prob": 0.366
          },
          "draw": {
            "best_odd": 3.73,
            "edge": 0.0284,
            "ev": 0.1059,
            "implied_prob": 0.2681,
            "model_prob": 0.2965
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "best_odd": 1.47,
            "edge": -0.3427,
            "ev": -0.5038,
            "implied_prob": 0.6803,
            "model_prob": 0.3375
          }
        },
        "btts": {
          "btts_ev_mode": "unavailable",
          "ev_available": false,
          "market_first": {
            "available": false
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 0,
          "reliability": "low"
        },
        "ou25": {
          "ev_available": false,
          "market_first": {
            "available": false
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 0,
          "ou_ev_mode": "unavailable",
          "reliability": "low"
        }
      },
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "avoid",
        "code": "no_edge",
        "execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
        "insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
        "stake_mult": 0.0,
        "use_split_strip": true
      },
      "match_tier": "no_bet",
      "min_ev": 0.02,
      "total_xg": 2.6,
      "variance_flag": false
    },
    "unified_decision": {
      "actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
      "algorithm": {
        "enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
        "game_typing_module": true,
        "version": "2.5.0"
      },
      "balanced_alternative": null,
      "best_consensus_ev": 0.0777,
      "best_outlier_ev": 1.2288,
      "best_tracked_ev": 0.0777,
      "confidence": 5.0,
      "decision_confidence_v1": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
          "pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Primary line identified (+1.0)",
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)"
        ],
        "breakdown_v2": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "guard_capped": true,
        "score": 3.0,
        "score_before_guard": 5.0,
        "score_v1_legacy": 3.0,
        "score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.0,
        "strength_v2": true
      },
      "decision_strength_v2": {
        "breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "score": 3.0,
        "score_pre_penalty": 3.0
      },
      "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
      "execution": {
        "1x2_dominant": false,
        "1x2_open_contest": true,
        "grade": "B",
        "stake_factor": 0.5
      },
      "favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
        "active": false,
        "gap": null,
        "side": null
      },
      "final_action": "wait",
      "final_decision": {
        "action": "wait",
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": false,
          "direction_key": "conflict",
          "gap_pp": 27.4,
          "key": "conflict",
          "label": "Disagree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": false,
          "pricing_key": "low",
          "probability_gap_pp": 27.4,
          "summary": "The market has repriced Sanjoanense, but the model still strongly favours Pacos de Brandao."
        },
        "alignment_key": "conflict",
        "best_consensus_ev": 0.0777,
        "best_outlier_ev": 0.012287999999999999,
        "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
        "decision_strength": 3.0,
        "decision_strength_v1": 3.0,
        "decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
        "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
        "execution_confidence": 16,
        "extreme_disagreement": false,
        "final_verdict_audit": {
          "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
          "action_label": "Action",
          "decision": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
          "is_primary": false,
          "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Pacos de Brandao at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 14.8%.",
          "why": [
            {
              "text": "Decision Model identifies Pacos de Brandao as the value side (36.6%)",
              "tone": "ok"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
              "tone": "bad"
            }
          ],
          "why_label": "Decision Summary"
        },
        "gap_pp": 21.8,
        "gates_failed": [
          "Reliability below 65"
        ],
        "has_top_pick": true,
        "headline": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
        "hero_mode": "default",
        "icon": "\u23f8",
        "label": "Wait for validation",
        "market_signal": "The market has repriced Sanjoanense, but the model still strongly favours Pacos de Brandao.",
        "model_conflict_detail": null,
        "model_lean": "Pacos de Brandao",
        "no_primary_reasons": {
          "all_triggered": [
            "market_conflict",
            "market_quality",
            "calibration_risk"
          ],
          "calibration_mode": "soft",
          "codes": [
            "market_conflict",
            "market_quality"
          ],
          "label": "Reason",
          "other_factors": [
            {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            }
          ],
          "other_label": "Other factors",
          "primary": {
            "code": "market_conflict",
            "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
            "name": "Market Conflict",
            "short": "Market Conflict",
            "subtype": "probability_gap",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "secondary": {
            "code": "market_quality",
            "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
            "name": "Market Quality Risk",
            "short": "Market Quality Risk",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "version": "v1"
        },
        "outlier_detected": false,
        "outlier_excluded_panel": "",
        "primary_allowed": false,
        "primary_block_explain": {
          "entries": [
            {
              "key": "positive_ev",
              "label": "Consensus EV +7.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
              "ok": true
            },
            {
              "key": "gate",
              "label": "Reliability below 65",
              "ok": false
            }
          ],
          "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
          "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
          "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
          "title": "Why not Primary?"
        },
        "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +7.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
        "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +7.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
        "primary_gates": {
          "items": [
            {
              "key": "extreme_gap",
              "label": "Extreme gap",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "no"
            },
            {
              "key": "xg_calibration",
              "label": "xG calibration",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "warning"
            },
            {
              "key": "reliability",
              "label": "Rel",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "57 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "execution",
              "label": "Exec",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "16 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "alignment",
              "label": "Align",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "conflict"
            },
            {
              "key": "consensus_ev",
              "label": "ConsEV",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "+7.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
            },
            {
              "key": "top_pick",
              "label": "Pick",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            },
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "false"
            }
          ],
          "passed": 4,
          "total": 8
        },
        "primary_type": null,
        "reasons": [
          "The market has repriced Sanjoanense, but the model still strongly favours Pacos de Brandao.",
          "Decision strength: 3.0/10",
          "Reliability below 65"
        ],
        "reliability_score": 57,
        "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
        "strength_v2_breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "subline": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
        "thresholds": {
          "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
          "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
          "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
          "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
          "min_execution": 65,
          "min_reliability": 65,
          "min_strength": 7.0,
          "source": "db",
          "user_id": 2
        },
        "thresholds_source": "db",
        "thresholds_user_id": 2,
        "tier": "wait",
        "validation_ok": false,
        "value_context": {
          "consensus_ev": 0.0777,
          "consensus_ev_display": "+7.8%",
          "consensus_odds": 6.09,
          "disagreement_label": "Strong",
          "disagreement_level": "strong",
          "implied_prob": 0.1476,
          "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
          "model_prob": 0.366,
          "raw_edge_display": "+21.8 percentage points",
          "raw_edge_pp": 21.8,
          "raw_implied_prob": 0.16420361247947454,
          "raw_signal_ev": 1.2289,
          "raw_signal_ev_display": "+122.9%"
        },
        "version": "v2.5",
        "xg_calibration": {
          "block_value_alert": true,
          "calibration_status": "warning",
          "deviation_pct": -1.5,
          "reasons": [
            "Low xG separation gap=0.06 (noise / no edge)"
          ],
          "recommended_action": "monitor",
          "strength_delta": -2.0,
          "uplift_away": null,
          "uplift_home": null,
          "xg_separation": {
            "band": "flat",
            "block_value_alert": true,
            "separation_score": -20,
            "strength_delta": -2.0,
            "xg_gap": 0.06
          }
        }
      },
      "game_type": {
        "label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
        "scoring_type": "balanced",
        "signals": {
          "btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
          "draw_prob": 0.2965,
          "max_1x2_prob": 0.366,
          "over_prob": 0.482,
          "total_xg": 2.6,
          "under_prob": 0.518,
          "xg_diff": 0.06
        },
        "type": "balanced",
        "typing_weights_enabled": true
      },
      "guard_active": true,
      "guard_level": "extreme",
      "guard_message": "Model validation failed \u2014 value signals on 1X2 are not actionable until inputs are verified.",
      "hero_display_pick": null,
      "hero_mode": "default",
      "longshot_picks": [],
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "consensus_odds": 6.09,
          "decision": "guard_blocked",
          "decision_before_guard": "value_bet",
          "edge": 0.0294,
          "ev": 0.0777,
          "guard_blocked": true,
          "implied_prob": 0.1476,
          "max_ev_side": "away",
          "model_prob": 0.366,
          "side": "away",
          "side_label": "Pacos de Brandao"
        },
        "btts": {
          "decision": "lean",
          "decision_layer": {
            "available": false
          },
          "edge": null,
          "ev": null,
          "implied_prob": null,
          "model_prob": 0.545,
          "side": "yes",
          "value_side": "yes"
        },
        "ou_2_5": {
          "decision": "no_bet",
          "decision_layer": {
            "available": false
          },
          "edge": null,
          "ev": null,
          "implied_prob": null,
          "model_prob": 0.518,
          "side": "under",
          "value_side": "under"
        }
      },
      "match_id": 1619896,
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "optional",
        "actionable": true,
        "clear_edge": false,
        "code": "thin_edge",
        "execution_line_key": null,
        "insight_line_key": null,
        "max_valid_ev": 0.0777,
        "min_ev": 0.02,
        "stake_mult": 0.25,
        "use_split_strip": false
      },
      "match_tier": "value_game",
      "no_clear_primary": false,
      "probabilities": {
        "away": 0.366,
        "draw": 0.2965,
        "home": 0.3375
      },
      "reason_codes": [
        "model_summary"
      ],
      "secondary_pick": null,
      "secondary_picks": [],
      "show_betting_primary_label": false,
      "suppressed_primary": null,
      "teams": {
        "away": "Pacos de Brandao",
        "home": "Sanjoanense"
      },
      "top_pick": {
        "composite_score": 0.031282,
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "ev": 0.0777,
        "implied_prob": 0.1476,
        "market": "1x2",
        "model_prob": 0.366,
        "not_dominant": true,
        "primary_strength": "weak",
        "risk_band": "speculative",
        "risk_tier": "primary",
        "side": "away",
        "side_label": "Pacos de Brandao",
        "slot": "primary",
        "speculative_primary": true
      },
      "valid_markets_count": 1,
      "value_context_1x2": {
        "consensus_ev": 0.0777,
        "consensus_ev_display": "+7.8%",
        "consensus_odds": 6.09,
        "disagreement_label": "Strong",
        "disagreement_level": "strong",
        "implied_prob": 0.1476,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "model_prob": 0.366,
        "raw_edge_display": "+21.8 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 21.8,
        "raw_implied_prob": 0.16420361247947454,
        "raw_signal_ev": 1.2289,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+122.9%"
      }
    }
  },
  "fixture_id": 1619896,
  "generated_at_utc": "2026-08-30T15:59:43.726467+00:00",
  "lang_id": "en"
}

Dapatkan Ramalan Premium untuk Sanjoanense & Pacos de Brandao!

Buka analisis mendalam, tip pertaruhan eksklusif, dan ramalan perlawanan dengan perkhidmatan langganan premium kami.

Langgan Sekarang
Kembali ke Statistik