Laman pertaruhan premium stake: pengguna baharu boleh guna kod promo FHn2uDc1. Daftar sekarang
Pasaran yang dijejaki vs hasil sepenuh masa
Setiap baris membandingkan model pra-perlawanan lean dengan keputusan sepenuh masa.
- Pasaran Ramalan Hasilnya Hasil
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 matlamat) ✔ Betul
- Kedua-dua Pasukan Menjaringkan Gol BTTS Ya Ya ✔ Betul
- 1X2 Unionistas de Salamanca Unionistas de Salamanca ✔ Betul
- Cerapan skor tepat 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 3-1 ✖ tak betul
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
2.75
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
+0.0%
Final Result
Unionistas de Salamanca win · Unionistas de Salamanca 3–1 UD Ourense
Prediction
✔ Correct
Decision Grade
A
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Taklimat AI untuk perlawanan ini belum tersedia. Selepas naik taraf pelayan, jalankan semula “Batch generate odds” untuk menjana ringkasan.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "ea751ad3901e640b989633d6aaaaf8031b0bace2436116325106476dfc913e41",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.25,
"away_win_prob": 0.3285,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.455,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2961,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 3.04,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.38,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.66,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.35,
"home_win_prob": 0.3754,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Winner : Unionistas de Salamanca",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "10%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "45%",
"winner_name": "Unionistas de Salamanca"
},
"away_xg": 1.25,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": -0.0005,
"edge_gap": 0.047,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.3761,
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 32.9,
"draw": 29.6,
"home": 37.6
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"odd": 2.38
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 2.38,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"display_market": "Unionistas de Salamanca Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Home",
"market_fair_odds": 2.66,
"market_odds": 2.38,
"model_odds": 2.66,
"overround": 11.7,
"prob_edge": -4.4,
"value_pct": -10.5,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 0,
"away_failed_to_score": 3,
"away_played": 3,
"away_score_rate": 71.3,
"home_clean_sheet": 0,
"home_failed_to_score": 0,
"home_played": 3,
"home_score_rate": 74.1,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 54.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.25,
"home_expected": 1.35,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 10.0
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.3
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.5
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 7.8
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Unionistas de Salamanca or Draw",
"prob": 67.1
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Unionistas de Salamanca or UD Ourense",
"prob": 70.4
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or UD Ourense",
"prob": 62.5
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Unionistas de Salamanca or UD Ourense",
"pick_prob": 70.4
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 32.9,
"draw_pct": 29.6,
"home_pct": 37.5,
"lean_key": "home",
"lean_label": "Unionistas de Salamanca"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 0.0,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 1.3,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Over 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"edge": -10.5,
"implied_prob": 42.0,
"is_value": false,
"label": "Home",
"market": "Unionistas de Salamanca Win",
"model_prob": 37.6,
"odds": 2.38
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "UD Ourense",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 32.55,
"draw": 29.84,
"home": 37.61
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Bet365",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-19 11:00:54",
"early_bookmaker": "Bet365",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-19 10:31:11",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 37.61,
"gap_pp": -0.05,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 37.57
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 29.84,
"gap_pp": -0.27,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 29.56
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 32.55,
"gap_pp": 0.32,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 32.87
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 41.86,
"gap_pp": 6.34,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 48.2
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 58.14,
"gap_pp": -6.34,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 51.8
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 48.52,
"gap_pp": 5.98,
"kind": "btts_y",
"model_pct": 54.5
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 51.48,
"gap_pp": -5.98,
"kind": "btts_n",
"model_pct": 45.5
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 2.38,
"early": 2.38,
"implied_closing_pct": 37.61,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 37.61,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.0,
"early": 3.0,
"implied_closing_pct": 29.84,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 29.84,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 2.75,
"early": 2.75,
"implied_closing_pct": 32.55,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 32.55,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 2.25,
"early": 2.25,
"implied_closing_pct": 41.86,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 41.86,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 1.62,
"early": 1.62,
"implied_closing_pct": 58.14,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 58.14,
"kind": "ou_u"
},
{
"closing": 1.91,
"early": 1.91,
"implied_closing_pct": 48.52,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 48.52,
"kind": "btts_y"
},
{
"closing": 1.8,
"early": 1.8,
"implied_closing_pct": 51.48,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 51.48,
"kind": "btts_n"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 6.3,
"kind": "ou_o"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -4.2,
"ev": -0.25,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 6.0,
"market_prob": 0.1667,
"market_prob_pct": 16.7,
"model_prob": 0.125,
"model_prob_pct": 12.5,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 10.0
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.3
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.5
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 7.8
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.35,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.205,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.17,
"edge": 0.0121,
"edge_pp": 1.2,
"market_prob": 0.4229,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.205,
"best_odd": 2.17,
"edge": 0.0121,
"ev": -0.0561,
"implied_prob": 0.4229,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.435
},
"p_final": 0.435,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 5.9,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0459,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0561,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2255,
"best_odd": 1.59,
"edge": -0.0133,
"ev": -0.1036,
"implied_prob": 0.5771,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.5638
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.0845,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 8.5,
"text": "+8.5%"
},
"ev_under": -0.1608,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -16.1,
"text": "-16.1%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.0845,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 10226.05,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "over"
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2066,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.87,
"edge": 0.0113,
"edge_pp": 1.1,
"market_prob": 0.4905,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.545,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2066,
"best_odd": 1.8,
"edge": -0.0113,
"ev": -0.1031,
"implied_prob": 0.5095,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4983
},
"p_final": 0.5017,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 5.5,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0192,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0618,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2066,
"best_odd": 1.87,
"edge": 0.0113,
"ev": -0.0618,
"implied_prob": 0.4905,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5017
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.1673,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -16.7,
"text": "-16.7%"
},
"ev_yes": 0.041,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 4.1,
"text": "+4.1%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.041,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"sort_key": 10036.9,
"tier": "best",
"value_side": "yes",
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"consensus_odds": 2.38,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"ev": -0.1053,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -10.5,
"text": "-10.5%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.3761,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": -0.1009,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -10.1,
"text": "-10.1%"
},
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"raw_edge_display": "+-0.0 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -0.0,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1058,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-10.6%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"sort_key": 1774.775,
"tier": "bad_ev"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.5,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.5
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "5/5",
"alert_breadth_note": "5/5 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2193 -19.1%",
"alert_team": "UD Ourense",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 0.3,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": 0.3,
"hero_label": "UD Ourense",
"market_prob_pct": 37.6,
"market_team": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"model_prob_pct": 37.5,
"model_team": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "\u2713",
"status_key": "aligned",
"status_label": "Reliable prediction",
"status_line": "Direction aligned; check pricing gap separately",
"steam_score": 96,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong multi-book steam",
"steam_tier": "A+",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 0.3,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 0.3,
"summary": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 0.3,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 0.3,
"summary": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0845,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.0845,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.2,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.2,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 36,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Unionistas de Salamanca at 37.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 37.6%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Unionistas de Salamanca as the value side (37.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 0.0,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +8.5% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +8.5% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.2/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +8.5% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.2/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "82 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "36 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+8.5% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"Decision strength: 3.2/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 82,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1053,
"consensus_ev_display": "-10.5%",
"consensus_odds": 2.38,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3761,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"raw_edge_display": "+-0.0 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -0.0,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.42016806722689076,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1058,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-10.6%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 0.0,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.1"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.1
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "5/5",
"breadth_ratio": 1.0,
"evidence": {
"score": 68,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees with model lean",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Sharp steam conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation passed",
"status": "pass"
}
],
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Pass",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Steam conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 24.9,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 10.0,
"steam_coherence": 0.0,
"validation": 30.0
},
"score": 82,
"stars": 4,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 0.3,
"market_agreement": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 0.3,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.25,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 0.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.35,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.35,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.35 \u00b7 Away xG 1.25 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +0%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": false,
"mv_status": "pass",
"odds_delta_pct": -19.1,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2193 -19.1%",
"steam_team": "UD Ourense",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 37,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 0.3,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 0.3,
"summary": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 0.3,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 0.3,
"summary": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0845,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.0845,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.2,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.2,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 36,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Unionistas de Salamanca at 37.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 37.6%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Unionistas de Salamanca as the value side (37.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 0.0,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +8.5% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +8.5% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.2/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +8.5% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.2/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "82 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "36 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+8.5% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"Decision strength: 3.2/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 82,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1053,
"consensus_ev_display": "-10.5%",
"consensus_odds": 2.38,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3761,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"raw_edge_display": "+-0.0 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -0.0,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.42016806722689076,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1058,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-10.6%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 0.0,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.1"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.1
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Unionistas de Salamanca 1.35 xG vs UD Ourense 1.25 \u2192 Unionistas de Salamanca 37.5%",
"Market: Unionistas de Salamanca ~37.6% implied",
"Market Steam: UD Ourense \u2193 -19.1%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Unionistas de Salamanca, but sharp money moved toward UD Ourense.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -0.07,
"fair_prob": 37.54,
"label": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"market_prob": 37.61,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": -0.23,
"fair_prob": 29.61,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 29.84,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 0.3,
"fair_prob": 32.85,
"label": "UD Ourense",
"market_prob": 32.55,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": 5.9,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 42.3,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": -5.9,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 57.7,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": 5.73,
"fair_prob": 54.5,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 48.77,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": -5.73,
"fair_prob": 45.5,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 51.23,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "aligned",
"edge_pp": 0.3,
"fair_prob_pct": 32.85,
"hero_side": "away",
"hero_team_name": "UD Ourense",
"market_prob_pct": 32.55,
"status": "market_efficient",
"steam_team_name": "UD Ourense"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The model and closing market are broadly aligned, with probability differences below 5 percentage points.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "aligned",
"edge_status": "market_efficient",
"max_gap_pp": 0.3,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "",
"divergence_level": "aligned",
"divergence_level_label": "Aligned",
"divergence_note": "",
"divergence_tier": "aligned",
"edge_label": "Aligned",
"edge_label_key": "aligned",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Strong",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 37.6,
"model_prob_gap_display": "-0.1 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": -0.1,
"model_prob_pct": 37.5,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "-0.1 percentage points",
"gap_pp": -0.1,
"label": "High",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_high"
},
"reliability_headline": "High reliability",
"reliability_icon": "\u2713",
"reliability_score": 82,
"reliability_tier": "high",
"summary": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Pass",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 37,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Unionistas de Salamanca 1.35 xG vs UD Ourense 1.25 \u2192 Unionistas de Salamanca 37.5%",
"Market: Unionistas de Salamanca ~37.6% implied",
"Market Steam: UD Ourense \u2193 -19.1%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Unionistas de Salamanca, but sharp money moved toward UD Ourense.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": 0.3,
"hero_label": "UD Ourense",
"hero_side": "away",
"market_activity": "UD Ourense odds shortened \u2193 -19.1%.",
"market_agreement": "strong",
"market_agreement_label": "Strong",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Current pricing remains close to the model baseline."
],
"follow_up": "",
"gap_tier": "aligned",
"lead": "The market and model are broadly aligned. Any small pricing gap likely reflects rounding or bookmaker margin, not a structural disagreement.",
"note": "Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on UD Ourense.",
"paragraphs": [
"The market and model are broadly aligned. Any small pricing gap likely reflects rounding or bookmaker margin, not a structural disagreement.",
"Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on UD Ourense."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"Market pricing and the fair estimate remain broadly aligned.",
"Recent line movement on UD Ourense (\u2193 -19.1%) aligns with the pricing gap.",
"Broad sportsbook alignment (5/5) supports the current market view on UD Ourense."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 0.3,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_pass",
"status": "pass"
},
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Favourite exceeds second outcome by 4.7 pp (at 37.5%)."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 4.7,
"max_prob_pct": 37.5,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "aligned",
"largest_gap_label": "UD Ourense",
"largest_gap_pp": 0.3,
"lead": "The model and closing market are broadly aligned.",
"level": "aligned",
"max_gap_pp": 0.3,
"title": "Broadly Aligned"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -0.07,
"edge_pp": -0.07,
"fair_prob_pct": 37.54,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"market_prob_pct": 37.61,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": -0.23,
"edge_pp": -0.23,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.61,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 29.84,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 0.3,
"edge_pp": 0.3,
"fair_prob_pct": 32.85,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "UD Ourense",
"market_prob_pct": 32.55,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
}
],
"status": "market_efficient",
"status_label": "Market Efficient",
"steam_note": "Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on UD Ourense.",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Unionistas de Salamanca (37.6%).",
"However, UD Ourense has attracted one of the strongest multi-book steam moves of the day (\u2193 -19.1%, 5/5).",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Unionistas de Salamanca, Market \u2192 Unionistas de Salamanca, Recent sharp money \u2192 UD Ourense.",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 36.36,
"closing_odds": 2.75,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 36.36,
"entry_odds": 2.75,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"model_validation_status": "pass",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 5,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -22.9%",
"odds_delta_pct": -22.9
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -22.2%",
"odds_delta_pct": -22.2
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -19.7%",
"odds_delta_pct": -19.7
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -19.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": -19.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -17.8%",
"odds_delta_pct": -17.8
}
],
"books_total": 5,
"breadth_display": "5/5",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 2.75,
"is_drift": false,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2193 -19.1%",
"move_pct_abs": 19.1,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 22h 14m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"5/5 books synchronized on UD Ourense (19.1% steam, score 96) \u2014 high-conviction multi-book repricing beats isolated ticks.",
"Sharp sportsbooks led a meaningful repricing with broad market follow-through."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": -19.1,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"3.40",
"3.08",
"2.75"
],
"display": "3.70 \u2192 2.70 \u2192 2.75",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 22h 14m",
"pick_team": "UD Ourense",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.70"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "2.70"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.75"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
3.4,
2.75
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,0.0 56.0,18.0",
"sparkline_trend": "down",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way drop",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.40"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "2.75"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "3.40"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.75"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 3.4,
"page_alert_line": "Sharp money alert: UD Ourense \u2193 -19.1% market move detected",
"phase_label": "Sharp repricing",
"phase_tip": "Aggressive adjustment \u2014 often sharp-led or high consensus.",
"pick_team": "UD Ourense",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "Sharp money alert: UD Ourense \u2193 -19.1% market move detected",
"sharp_leader": "Betfair",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "steam",
"signal_icon": "\ud83d\udd25",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 2.75,
"is_drift": false,
"label": "Sharp signal",
"move_display": "\u2193 -19.1%",
"open_odds": 3.4,
"summary": "Market moved toward UD Ourense while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "UD Ourense",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "strong_steam",
"signal_label": "Strong steam",
"steam_score": 96,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong multi-book steam",
"steam_tier": "A+",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "5/5",
"current_odds": 2.75,
"move_display": "\u2193 -19.1%",
"open_odds": 3.4,
"pick_team": "UD Ourense",
"steam_score": 96,
"steam_team_name": "UD Ourense",
"steam_tier": "A+"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 0.3,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "ud-ourense",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "UD Ourense",
"away_team_id": 9617,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/9617.webp",
"away_team_name": "UD Ourense",
"away_team_public_id": "5L0qJyUWkOW3VV",
"away_team_slug": "ud-ourense",
"country_code": "ES",
"country_display_name": "Spain",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/es.svg",
"country_id": 145,
"country_name": "Spain",
"fixture_id": 1570754,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Spain",
"home_team_display_name": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"home_team_id": 5281,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/5281.webp",
"home_team_name": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"home_team_public_id": "0SOkVBtLWOMzhL",
"home_team_slug": "unionistas-de-salamanca",
"ht.home_team_slug": "unionistas-de-salamanca",
"league_country": "Spain",
"league_country_display": "Spain",
"league_display_name": "Primera Divisi\u00f3n RFEF - Kumpulan 1",
"league_id": 435,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/435.webp",
"league_name": "Primera Divisi\u00f3n RFEF - Kumpulan 1",
"league_public_id": "2rWGCckC2HCYNB",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-19 11:00:00",
"public_id": "4GarSDNZPFHicF",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": null,
"venue_name": "Reina Sofia"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.4478,
"best_odd": 2.75,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0014,
"ev": -0.1009,
"implied_prob": 0.3255,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3255,
"draw": 0.2984,
"home": 0.3761
},
"model_prob": 0.3287,
"p_final": 0.3269
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2988,
"best_odd": 3.0,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0008,
"ev": -0.1073,
"implied_prob": 0.2984,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3255,
"draw": 0.2984,
"home": 0.3761
},
"model_prob": 0.2956,
"p_final": 0.2976
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.4497,
"best_odd": 2.38,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0002,
"ev": -0.1053,
"implied_prob": 0.3761,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3255,
"draw": 0.2984,
"home": 0.3761
},
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"p_final": 0.3759
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 2.75,
"edge": -0.0349,
"ev": -0.0961,
"implied_prob": 0.3636,
"model_prob": 0.3287
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.0,
"edge": -0.0377,
"ev": -0.1131,
"implied_prob": 0.3333,
"model_prob": 0.2956
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 2.38,
"edge": -0.0445,
"ev": -0.1059,
"implied_prob": 0.4202,
"model_prob": 0.3757
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.2066,
"alpha_yes": 0.2066,
"best_no_odd": 1.83,
"best_yes_odd": 1.91,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": -0.0573,
"edge_yes": 0.0573,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.1673,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.1031,
"ev_yes": 0.041,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0618,
"implied_no": 0.5123,
"implied_yes": 0.4877,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2066,
"best_odd": 1.8,
"edge": -0.0113,
"ev": -0.1031,
"implied_prob": 0.5095,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4983
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2066,
"best_odd": 1.87,
"edge": 0.0113,
"ev": -0.0618,
"implied_prob": 0.4905,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5017
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"p_final_no": 0.4983,
"p_final_yes": 0.5017,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.205,
"alpha_under": 0.2255,
"best_over_odd": 2.25,
"best_under_odd": 1.62,
"consensus_over_odd": 2.17,
"consensus_under_odd": 1.59,
"edge_over": 0.059,
"edge_under": -0.059,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.0845,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.0561,
"ev_under": -0.1608,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.1036,
"implied_over": 0.423,
"implied_over_mf": 0.4229,
"implied_under": 0.577,
"implied_under_mf": 0.5771,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.205,
"best_odd": 2.17,
"edge": 0.0121,
"ev": -0.0561,
"implied_prob": 0.4229,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.435
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2255,
"best_odd": 1.59,
"edge": -0.0133,
"ev": -0.1036,
"implied_prob": 0.5771,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.5638
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.435,
"p_final_under": 0.5638,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0845,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.0845,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.0845,
"confidence": 5.5,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.2,
"score_v1_legacy": 5.5,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 4.2,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.2,
"score_pre_penalty": 4.2
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 0.3,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 0.3,
"summary": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0845,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.0845,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.2,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.2,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 36,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Unionistas de Salamanca at 37.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 37.6%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Unionistas de Salamanca as the value side (37.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 0.0,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Unionistas de Salamanca",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +8.5% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +8.5% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.2/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +8.5% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.2/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "82 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "36 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+8.5% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"Decision strength: 3.2/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 82,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward UD Ourense, but the model still strongly favours Unionistas de Salamanca.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1053,
"consensus_ev_display": "-10.5%",
"consensus_odds": 2.38,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3761,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"raw_edge_display": "+-0.0 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -0.0,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.42016806722689076,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1058,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-10.6%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 0.0,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.1"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.1
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"draw_prob": 0.2956,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.3757,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.1
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 2.38,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": -0.0002,
"ev": -0.1053,
"implied_prob": 0.3761,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"side": "home",
"side_label": "Unionistas de Salamanca"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2066,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.87,
"edge": 0.0113,
"market_prob": 0.4905,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.545,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2066,
"best_odd": 1.8,
"edge": -0.0113,
"ev": -0.1031,
"implied_prob": 0.5095,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4983
},
"p_final": 0.5017,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0618,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2066,
"best_odd": 1.87,
"edge": 0.0113,
"ev": -0.0618,
"implied_prob": 0.4905,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5017
}
},
"edge": 0.0573,
"ev": 0.041,
"implied_prob": 0.4877,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"side": "yes",
"value_side": "yes"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.205,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.17,
"edge": 0.0121,
"market_prob": 0.4229,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.205,
"best_odd": 2.17,
"edge": 0.0121,
"ev": -0.0561,
"implied_prob": 0.4229,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.435
},
"p_final": 0.435,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0561,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2255,
"best_odd": 1.59,
"edge": -0.0133,
"ev": -0.1036,
"implied_prob": 0.5771,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.5638
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"edge": 0.059,
"ev": 0.0845,
"implied_prob": 0.423,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"side": "over",
"value_side": "over"
}
},
"match_id": 1570754,
"match_regime": {
"action": "bet",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": true,
"code": "clear_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.0845,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 1.0,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3287,
"draw": 0.2956,
"home": 0.3757
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "UD Ourense",
"home": "Unionistas de Salamanca"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.02851,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0845,
"implied_prob": 0.423,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"not_dominant": true,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "over",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 2,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1053,
"consensus_ev_display": "-10.5%",
"consensus_odds": 2.38,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.3761,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3757,
"raw_edge_display": "+-0.0 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -0.0,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.42016806722689076,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1058,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-10.6%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1570754,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-19T11:00:56.516143+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Terokai Kandungan Ramalan Lain
Dapatkan Ramalan Premium untuk Unionistas de Salamanca & UD Ourense!
Buka analisis mendalam, tip pertaruhan eksklusif, dan ramalan perlawanan dengan perkhidmatan langganan premium kami.
Langgan Sekarang
Primera División RFEF - Kumpulan 1 — Kedudukan
| # | PASUKAN | P | M | S | K | Mata |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lugo | 5 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 13 |
| 2 | Athletic Club II | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 11 |
| 3 | UD Logroñés | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| 4 | Cacereño | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| 5 | Deportivo La Coruña II | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| 6 | Cultural Leonesa | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| 7 | Real Unión | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 8 | Mirandes | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 9 | Pontevedra | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 10 | Ponferradina | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 11 | Zamora | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 12 | Racing Ferrol | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 |
| 13 | CD Coria | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| 14 | Real Avilés | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 15 | Barakaldo | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 16 | Mérida AD | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 17 | Extremadura 1924 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 3 |
| 18 | Unionistas de Salamanca | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 19 | Arenas Getxo | 5 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| 20 | UD Ourense | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 |
| # | PASUKAN | P | J | B | +/- | Mata |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Real Unión | 5 | 12 | 10 | +2 | 7 |
| 2 | Athletic Club II | 5 | 11 | 5 | +6 | 11 |
| 3 | UD Logroñés | 4 | 8 | 3 | +5 | 10 |
| 4 | Mirandes | 4 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 7 |
| 5 | CD Coria | 5 | 8 | 9 | -1 | 5 |
| 6 | Lugo | 5 | 7 | 2 | +5 | 13 |
| 7 | Deportivo La Coruña II | 5 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 8 |
| 8 | Pontevedra | 4 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 7 |
| 9 | Unionistas de Salamanca | 4 | 7 | 11 | -4 | 3 |
| 10 | Cacereño | 4 | 6 | 1 | +5 | 10 |
| 11 | Zamora | 5 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 7 |
| 12 | Racing Ferrol | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 7 |
| 13 | Real Avilés | 4 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| 14 | Cultural Leonesa | 5 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 8 |
| 15 | Mérida AD | 4 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 3 |
| 16 | Ponferradina | 4 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 7 |
| 17 | Arenas Getxo | 5 | 3 | 13 | -10 | 1 |
| 18 | Barakaldo | 4 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 4 |
| 19 | Extremadura 1924 | 5 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 3 |
| 20 | UD Ourense | 4 | 1 | 9 | -8 | 0 |
