Statistik / Bola Sepak / Perancis. Ligue 2 / Reims vs Montpellier

Reims vs Montpellier Statistics & Analysis

Sep 18, 2026 - 18:00
1 1.31
1 1.29
xG Accuracy: 85%
Laman pertaruhan premium stake: pengguna baharu boleh guna kod promo FHn2uDc1. Daftar sekarang

Pasaran yang dijejaki vs hasil sepenuh masa

Setiap baris membandingkan model pra-perlawanan lean dengan keputusan sepenuh masa.

  • Pasaran Ramalan Hasilnya Hasil
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 matlamat) ✔ Betul
  • Kedua-dua Pasukan Menjaringkan Gol BTTS Tidak Ya ✖ tak betul
  • 1X2 Reims Lukis ✖ tak betul
  • Cerapan skor tepat 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 1-1 ✔ Betul

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 12, 2026 · 02:24 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-8223946

Closing Odds 2.11
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Draw · Reims 1–1 Montpellier
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Intelijen pasaran

Bacaan selepas pilihan utama: bagaimana suapan penutup berprioriti bergerak berbanding model.

Ringkasan pasaran

Pasaran kekal stabil menjelang sepakan. Tiada anjakan implied ketara antara PRE30 dan PRE1 pada snapshot berprioriti.

Walaupun pergerakan lewat kecil, model masih menilai Lukis (1X2),Montpellier (1X2),Bawah 2.5 gol jauh melebihi implied snapshot penutupan — bacaan statik "model vs harga", bukan kejaran steam.

Model masih melebihi implied penutupan pada Montpellier (1X2) kira-kira 8.4 mata peratus — isyarat salah harga paling jelas pada halaman ini.

Model vs implied penutup

Pasaran Model % Implied penutup % Jurang (pp)
Reims (1X2) 35.6 45.6 -10.0
Lukis (1X2) 29.7 28.1 +1.6
Montpellier (1X2) 34.7 26.3 +8.4
Lebih 2.5 gol 48.2 50.9 -2.7
Bawah 2.5 gol 51.8 49.1 +2.7
Apa maksudnya

Secara ringkas: model kira-kira 34.7% pada Montpellier (1X2), manakala snapshot penutup menunjukkan kira-kira 26.3%. Bezanya — kira-kira 8.4 mata peratus — ialah jurang model-vs-pasaran terbesar yang ditonjolkan di halaman ini.

Ringkas: "implied penutup" ialah kebarangkalian terbit daripada odds akhir yang ditangkap (selepas de-vig ringkas). "Jurang (pp)" = peratus model tolak implied tersebut, dalam mata peratus (pp).

Pergerakan garisan menjelang sepakan mula

Satu buku prioriti setiap snapshot (bukan semua). Laluan tangkapan: PRE30 → PRE1 · Buku: Pinnacle

Dalam kurungan pada lajur: Penutup = snapshot pertama tersedia ikut PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Awal = pertama dalam PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 yang berbeza daripada Penutup.

Odds terperinci dilipat di bawah — pergerakan implied (de-vig) boleh diabaikan.

Lihat jadual penuh baris demi baris
Pasaran Awal (PRE30) Penutup (PRE1) Δ tersirat (pp)
Reims (1X2) 2.11 2.11 0.0
Lukis (1X2) 3.43 3.43 0.0
Montpellier (1X2) 3.66 3.66 0.0
Lebih 2.5 gol 1.9 1.9 0.0
Bawah 2.5 gol 1.97 1.97 0.0

Taklimat AI untuk perlawanan ini belum tersedia. Selepas naik taraf pelayan, jalankan semula “Batch generate odds” untuk menjana ringkasan.

View technical JSON
{
  "bundle_version": 1,
  "content_hash": "1006f6e668b8ccd35a6287a3ce1913c4fe291949b8b0ea7741881cc3e8a2028b",
  "decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
  "facts": {
    "ai_fp": {
      "away_predicted_xg": 1.29,
      "away_win_prob": 0.347,
      "away_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "bayes_applied": 0,
      "btts_no_prob": 0.455,
      "btts_yes_prob": 0.546,
      "dc_rho": -0.13,
      "draw_prob": 0.2965,
      "draw_prob_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_away": 2.88,
      "fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_draw": 3.37,
      "fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_home": 2.81,
      "fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
      "home_predicted_xg": 1.31,
      "home_win_prob": 0.3564,
      "home_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "over_25_prob": 0.482,
      "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
      "under_25_prob": 0.518
    },
    "api_prediction": {
      "advice": "Double chance : Reims or draw",
      "main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
      "percent_away": "10%",
      "percent_draw": "45%",
      "percent_home": "45%",
      "winner_name": "Reims"
    },
    "away_xg": 1.29,
    "betting_insight": {
      "bet_label": "Reims",
      "confidence": null,
      "main_pick_meta": {
        "confidence": "low",
        "display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
        "edge": -0.1003,
        "edge_gap": 0.0087,
        "market": "1X2",
        "market_prob": 0.4563,
        "model_prob": 0.3559,
        "pick_type": "no_strong",
        "probabilities": {
          "away": 34.7,
          "draw": 29.7,
          "home": 35.6
        },
        "reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
        "selection": null,
        "selection_name": null
      },
      "market_comparison": [
        {
          "affi_link": "",
          "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
          "odd": 2.11
        }
      ],
      "risk_color": null,
      "risk_key": null,
      "stacked_market": null,
      "value_bet": {
        "best_odds": 2.11,
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "display_market": "Reims Win",
        "is_value": false,
        "label": "Home",
        "market_fair_odds": 2.19,
        "market_odds": 2.11,
        "model_odds": 2.81,
        "overround": 3.9,
        "prob_edge": -11.8,
        "value_pct": -24.9,
        "value_rating": "no_value"
      }
    },
    "betting_markets": {
      "btts": {
        "away_clean_sheet": 4,
        "away_failed_to_score": 1,
        "away_played": 6,
        "away_score_rate": 72.5,
        "home_clean_sheet": 1,
        "home_failed_to_score": 1,
        "home_played": 6,
        "home_score_rate": 73.0,
        "no_prob": 45.5,
        "pick": "No",
        "pick_prob": 54.5,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": true,
        "yes_prob": 54.5
      },
      "correct_score": {
        "away_expected": 1.29,
        "home_expected": 1.31,
        "scores": [
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-1",
            "prob": 12.6
          },
          {
            "away": 0,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-0",
            "prob": 9.7
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 0,
            "label": "0-1",
            "prob": 9.6
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 2,
            "label": "2-1",
            "prob": 8.2
          },
          {
            "away": 2,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-2",
            "prob": 8.1
          }
        ],
        "source": "xG"
      },
      "double_chance": {
        "options": [
          {
            "key": "1X",
            "label": "Reims or Draw",
            "prob": 65.2
          },
          {
            "key": "12",
            "label": "Reims or Montpellier",
            "prob": 70.3
          },
          {
            "key": "X2",
            "label": "Draw or Montpellier",
            "prob": 64.3
          }
        ],
        "pick_key": "12",
        "pick_label": "Reims or Montpellier",
        "pick_prob": 70.3
      },
      "match_winner": {
        "away_pct": 34.7,
        "draw_pct": 29.6,
        "home_pct": 35.6,
        "lean_key": "home",
        "lean_label": "Reims"
      },
      "over_under": {
        "api_hint": null,
        "avg_total": 2.6,
        "away_avg_scored": 0.8,
        "confidence": "low",
        "home_avg_scored": 2.3,
        "over_prob": 48.2,
        "pick": "Under 2.5",
        "pick_prob": 51.8,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": true,
        "total_expected": 2.6,
        "under_prob": 51.8
      },
      "prob_source": "poisson",
      "value_bet_enhanced": {
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "edge": 27.0,
        "implied_prob": 27.3,
        "is_value": true,
        "label": "Away",
        "market": "Montpellier Win",
        "model_prob": 34.7,
        "odds": 3.66
      }
    },
    "closing_line_bundle": {
      "away_team": "Montpellier",
      "closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
        "away": 26.3,
        "draw": 28.07,
        "home": 45.63
      },
      "closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "closing_capture": "PRE1",
      "closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-18 18:00:47",
      "early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "early_capture": "PRE30",
      "early_fetched_at": "2026-09-18 17:32:19",
      "has_data": true,
      "home_team": "Reims",
      "largest_move_kind": null,
      "max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
      "model_vs_closing": [
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 45.63,
          "gap_pp": -10.03,
          "kind": "1x2_h",
          "model_pct": 35.59
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 28.07,
          "gap_pp": 1.61,
          "kind": "1x2_d",
          "model_pct": 29.68
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 26.3,
          "gap_pp": 8.42,
          "kind": "1x2_a",
          "model_pct": 34.73
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 50.9,
          "gap_pp": -2.7,
          "kind": "ou_o",
          "model_pct": 48.2
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 49.1,
          "gap_pp": 2.7,
          "kind": "ou_u",
          "model_pct": 51.8
        }
      ],
      "movement": [
        {
          "closing": 2.11,
          "early": 2.11,
          "implied_closing_pct": 45.63,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 45.63,
          "kind": "1x2_h"
        },
        {
          "closing": 3.43,
          "early": 3.43,
          "implied_closing_pct": 28.07,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 28.07,
          "kind": "1x2_d"
        },
        {
          "closing": 3.66,
          "early": 3.66,
          "implied_closing_pct": 26.3,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 26.3,
          "kind": "1x2_a"
        },
        {
          "closing": 1.9,
          "early": 1.9,
          "implied_closing_pct": 50.9,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 50.9,
          "kind": "ou_o"
        },
        {
          "closing": 1.97,
          "early": 1.97,
          "implied_closing_pct": 49.1,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 49.1,
          "kind": "ou_u"
        }
      ],
      "movement_negligible": true,
      "same_bookmaker": true,
      "top_value_gap": {
        "gap_pp": 8.4,
        "kind": "1x2_a"
      }
    },
    "correct_score_insight": {
      "best_value": null,
      "lean_card": {
        "diff_pp": -2.8,
        "ev": -0.181,
        "has_edge": false,
        "label": "1-1",
        "market_odds": 6.5,
        "market_prob": 0.1538,
        "market_prob_pct": 15.4,
        "model_prob": 0.126,
        "model_prob_pct": 12.6,
        "n_bookmakers": 8,
        "status_key": "no_value"
      },
      "most_likely": {
        "label": "1-1",
        "prob": 12.6
      },
      "top5": [
        {
          "label": "1-1",
          "prob": 12.6
        },
        {
          "label": "1-0",
          "prob": 9.7
        },
        {
          "label": "0-1",
          "prob": 9.6
        },
        {
          "label": "2-1",
          "prob": 8.2
        },
        {
          "label": "1-2",
          "prob": 8.1
        }
      ]
    },
    "home_xg": 1.31,
    "homepage_pick": null,
    "market_cards": [
      {
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "decision_layer": {
          "alpha": 0.2194,
          "available": true,
          "consensus_odds": 2.1,
          "edge": 0.0036,
          "edge_pp": 0.4,
          "market_prob": 0.4385,
          "mode": "market_first_btts",
          "model_prob": 0.455,
          "n_bookmakers": 7,
          "no": {
            "alpha": 0.2194,
            "best_odd": 2.1,
            "edge": 0.0036,
            "ev": -0.0715,
            "implied_prob": 0.4385,
            "model_prob": 0.455,
            "p_final": 0.4421
          },
          "p_final": 0.4421,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "raw_edge_pp": 1.7,
          "raw_signal_ev": -0.0445,
          "risk_adj_ev": -0.0715,
          "value_side": "no",
          "yes": {
            "alpha": 0.2414,
            "best_odd": 1.64,
            "edge": -0.004,
            "ev": -0.0857,
            "implied_prob": 0.5615,
            "model_prob": 0.545,
            "p_final": 0.5575
          }
        },
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_no": 0.0465,
        "ev_no_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 4.7,
          "text": "+4.7%"
        },
        "ev_yes": -0.0735,
        "ev_yes_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -7.3,
          "text": "-7.3%"
        },
        "featured": true,
        "id": "btts",
        "max_ev": 0.0465,
        "n_bookmakers": 7,
        "no_prob": 45.5,
        "sort_key": 10041.85,
        "tier": "best",
        "value_side": "no",
        "yes_prob": 54.5
      },
      {
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "decision_layer": {
          "alpha": 0.2266,
          "available": true,
          "consensus_odds": 1.92,
          "edge": 0.0062,
          "edge_pp": 0.6,
          "market_prob": 0.4907,
          "mode": "market_first_ou",
          "model_prob": 0.518,
          "n_bookmakers": 8,
          "over": {
            "alpha": 0.2266,
            "best_odd": 1.85,
            "edge": -0.0062,
            "ev": -0.0693,
            "implied_prob": 0.5093,
            "model_prob": 0.482,
            "p_final": 0.5031
          },
          "p_final": 0.4969,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "raw_edge_pp": 2.7,
          "raw_signal_ev": -0.0054,
          "risk_adj_ev": -0.046,
          "under": {
            "alpha": 0.2266,
            "best_odd": 1.92,
            "edge": 0.0062,
            "ev": -0.046,
            "implied_prob": 0.4907,
            "model_prob": 0.518,
            "p_final": 0.4969
          },
          "value_side": "under"
        },
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_over": -0.0601,
        "ev_over_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -6.0,
          "text": "-6.0%"
        },
        "ev_under": 0.0464,
        "ev_under_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 4.6,
          "text": "+4.6%"
        },
        "featured": false,
        "id": "ou_2_5",
        "max_ev": 0.0464,
        "n_bookmakers": 8,
        "over_prob": 48.2,
        "sort_key": 10041.76,
        "tier": "best",
        "under_prob": 51.8,
        "value_side": "under"
      },
      {
        "authority_action": "no_bet",
        "authority_note": "The market has moved toward Montpellier, but the model still strongly favours Reims.",
        "consensus_odds": 2.11,
        "decision": "no_bet",
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "ev": -0.1182,
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -11.8,
          "text": "-11.8%"
        },
        "featured": false,
        "id": "1x2",
        "implied_prob": 0.4563,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "max_ev": 0.0435,
        "max_ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 4.3,
          "text": "+4.3%"
        },
        "model_prob": 0.3559,
        "raw_edge_display": "-10.0 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": -10.0,
        "raw_signal_ev": -0.2491,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "-24.9%",
        "show_primary_label": false,
        "side_label": "Reims",
        "sort_key": 5234.8,
        "tier": "lean"
      },
      {
        "featured": false,
        "id": "correct_score",
        "sort_key": 817.8,
        "tier": "risk",
        "top_label": "1-1",
        "top_prob": 12.6
      }
    ],
    "market_intelligence": {
      "betting_signal": {
        "alert_breadth": "9/9",
        "alert_breadth_note": "9/9 sportsbooks confirmed",
        "alert_move": "\u2193 -26.7%",
        "alert_team": "Montpellier",
        "alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
        "divergence_pp": 10.0,
        "has_alert": true,
        "hero_edge_pp": -9.99,
        "hero_label": "Reims",
        "market_prob_pct": 45.6,
        "market_team": "Reims",
        "model_prob_pct": 35.6,
        "model_team": "Reims",
        "show": true,
        "status_icon": "\u2713",
        "status_key": "disagrees",
        "status_label": "Reliable prediction",
        "status_line": "Market disagrees with model",
        "steam_score": 99,
        "steam_subtitle": "Strong multi-book steam",
        "steam_tier": "A+",
        "title": "Betting Signal"
      },
      "decision_chain": {
        "academy_links": [
          {
            "key": "steam",
            "read_min": 4,
            "title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
            "url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "clv_pending",
            "read_min": 3,
            "title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
            "url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
          }
        ],
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": true,
          "direction_key": "agree",
          "gap_pp": 10.0,
          "key": "conflict",
          "label": "Disagree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 10.0,
          "summary": "The market has moved toward Montpellier, but the model still strongly favours Reims."
        },
        "authority": {
          "action": "no_bet",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": true,
            "direction_key": "agree",
            "gap_pp": 10.0,
            "key": "conflict",
            "label": "Disagree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 10.0,
            "summary": "The market has moved toward Montpellier, but the model still strongly favours Reims."
          },
          "alignment_key": "conflict",
          "best_consensus_ev": 0.0465,
          "best_outlier_ev": 0.271,
          "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
          "decision_strength": 3.0,
          "decision_strength_v1": 4.5,
          "decision_strength_v2": 3.3,
          "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
          "execution_confidence": 34,
          "extreme_disagreement": false,
          "final_verdict_audit": {
            "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
            "action_label": "Action",
            "decision": "No Primary Bet",
            "is_primary": false,
            "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Reims at 35.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 45.6%.",
            "why": [
              {
                "text": "Decision Model identifies Reims as the value side (35.6%)",
                "tone": "ok"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Edge does not clear Primary threshold",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
                "tone": "bad"
              }
            ],
            "why_label": "Decision Summary"
          },
          "gap_pp": 10.0,
          "gates_failed": [
            "Execution confidence below 65"
          ],
          "has_top_pick": false,
          "headline": "No Primary Bet",
          "hero_mode": "default",
          "icon": "\u25cb",
          "label": "No Primary Bet",
          "market_signal": "The market has moved toward Montpellier, but the model still strongly favours Reims.",
          "model_conflict_detail": null,
          "model_lean": "Reims",
          "no_primary_reasons": {
            "all_triggered": [
              "market_conflict",
              "market_quality",
              "edge_low",
              "calibration_risk"
            ],
            "calibration_mode": "soft",
            "codes": [
              "market_conflict",
              "market_quality"
            ],
            "label": "Reason",
            "other_factors": [
              {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              }
            ],
            "other_label": "Other factors",
            "primary": {
              "code": "market_conflict",
              "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
              "name": "Market Conflict",
              "short": "Market Conflict",
              "subtype": "drift_against_model",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "secondary": {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "version": "v1"
          },
          "outlier_detected": true,
          "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Reims \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.57 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +27% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1552484 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.57 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +4.7% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
          "primary_allowed": false,
          "primary_block_explain": {
            "entries": [
              {
                "key": "weak_ev",
                "label": "Consensus EV +4.7% \u003c Primary gate +5.0% (Lean gate +2.0% is separate \u2014 not Primary)",
                "ok": false
              },
              {
                "key": "gate",
                "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
                "ok": false
              }
            ],
            "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
            "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
            "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
            "title": "Why not Primary?"
          },
          "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +4.7% \u274c (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
          "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +4.7% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
          "primary_gates": {
            "items": [
              {
                "key": "extreme_gap",
                "label": "Extreme gap",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "no"
              },
              {
                "key": "xg_calibration",
                "label": "xG calibration",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "warning"
              },
              {
                "key": "reliability",
                "label": "Rel",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "77 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "execution",
                "label": "Exec",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "34 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "alignment",
                "label": "Align",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "conflict"
              },
              {
                "key": "consensus_ev",
                "label": "ConsEV",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "+4.7% (\u2265+5.0%)"
              },
              {
                "key": "top_pick",
                "label": "Pick",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "false"
              },
              {
                "key": "validation",
                "label": "Validation",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              }
            ],
            "passed": 4,
            "total": 8
          },
          "primary_type": null,
          "reasons": [
            "The market has moved toward Montpellier, but the model still strongly favours Reims.",
            "Decision strength: 3.0/10",
            "Execution confidence below 65",
            "Outlier price +27% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
          ],
          "reliability_score": 77,
          "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
          "strength_v2_breakdown": [
            "Base decision score (v1)",
            "Reliability supports action",
            "Market steam conflicts with model",
            "Thin consensus value",
            "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
          ],
          "subline": "The market has moved toward Montpellier, but the model still strongly favours Reims.",
          "thresholds": {
            "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
            "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
            "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
            "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
            "min_execution": 65,
            "min_reliability": 65,
            "min_strength": 7.0,
            "source": "db",
            "user_id": 2
          },
          "thresholds_source": "db",
          "thresholds_user_id": 2,
          "tier": "observe",
          "validation_ok": true,
          "value_context": {
            "consensus_ev": -0.1182,
            "consensus_ev_display": "-11.8%",
            "consensus_odds": 2.11,
            "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
            "disagreement_level": "moderate",
            "implied_prob": 0.4563,
            "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
            "model_prob": 0.3559,
            "raw_edge_display": "-10.0 percentage points",
            "raw_edge_pp": -10.0,
            "raw_implied_prob": 0.47393364928909953,
            "raw_signal_ev": -0.2491,
            "raw_signal_ev_display": "-24.9%"
          },
          "version": "v2.5",
          "xg_calibration": {
            "block_value_alert": true,
            "calibration_status": "warning",
            "deviation_pct": -3.0,
            "reasons": [
              "Low xG separation gap=0.02 (noise / no edge)"
            ],
            "recommended_action": "monitor",
            "strength_delta": -2.0,
            "uplift_away": null,
            "uplift_home": null,
            "xg_separation": {
              "band": "flat",
              "block_value_alert": true,
              "separation_score": -20,
              "strength_delta": -2.0,
              "xg_gap": 0.02
            }
          }
        },
        "bet_status": "no_bet",
        "books_breadth_display": "9/9",
        "breadth_ratio": 1.0,
        "evidence": {
          "score": 68,
          "signals": [
            {
              "icon": "\u25cb",
              "key": "statistical_edge",
              "label": "No strong statistical edge",
              "status": "neutral"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "market_agreement",
              "label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
              "status": "caution"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Sharp steam conflicts with model",
              "status": "caution"
            },
            {
              "icon": "\u2713",
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation passed",
              "status": "pass"
            }
          ],
          "stars": 3,
          "tier": "moderate",
          "tier_label": "Moderate"
        },
        "forecast_reliability": {
          "breakdown": [
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation: Pass",
              "tone": "ok"
            },
            {
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Steam conflicts with model",
              "tone": "caution"
            }
          ],
          "parts": {
            "alignment": 20.0,
            "data_quality": 12.0,
            "market_coverage": 10.0,
            "steam_coherence": 0.0,
            "validation": 30.0
          },
          "score": 77,
          "stars": 4,
          "tier": "high",
          "tier_label": "High"
        },
        "lean_gap_pp": 9.99,
        "market_agreement": "moderate",
        "max_gap_pp": 9.99,
        "model_calibration": {
          "away_xg": 1.29,
          "calibration_status": "ok",
          "deviation_pct": -3.0,
          "elevated": false,
          "home_xg": 1.31,
          "impact_note": "",
          "league_avg_xg": 1.35,
          "peak_xg": 1.31,
          "status_label": "Within typical league range",
          "summary": "Home xG 1.31 \u00b7 Away xG 1.29 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -3%",
          "title": "Model Calibration Check"
        },
        "move_is_drift": false,
        "mv_status": "pass",
        "odds_delta_pct": -26.7,
        "steam_conflicts": true,
        "steam_move_display": "\u2193 -26.7%",
        "steam_team": "Montpellier",
        "suppress_execution": false,
        "value_split": {
          "execution_confidence": {
            "label": "Monitoring Confidence",
            "score": 34,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "market_compatibility": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 17,
            "tier": "not_reliable",
            "tier_label": "Not reliable"
          },
          "model_edge_strength": {
            "label": "Model Signal Strength",
            "score": 35,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "model_value": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 17,
            "tier": "not_reliable",
            "tier_label": "Not reliable"
          },
          "recommendation": {
            "action": "no_bet",
            "label": "No Primary Bet"
          }
        },
        "verdict": {
          "agree_note": "The market has moved toward Montpellier, but the model still strongly favours Reims.",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": true,
            "direction_key": "agree",
            "gap_pp": 10.0,
            "key": "conflict",
            "label": "Disagree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 10.0,
            "summary": "The market has moved toward Montpellier, but the model still strongly favours Reims."
          },
          "authority": {
            "action": "no_bet",
            "alignment": {
              "direction_aligned": true,
              "direction_key": "agree",
              "gap_pp": 10.0,
              "key": "conflict",
              "label": "Disagree",
              "model_strong": false,
              "pricing_aligned": true,
              "pricing_key": "moderate",
              "probability_gap_pp": 10.0,
              "summary": "The market has moved toward Montpellier, but the model still strongly favours Reims."
            },
            "alignment_key": "conflict",
            "best_consensus_ev": 0.0465,
            "best_outlier_ev": 0.271,
            "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
            "decision_strength": 3.0,
            "decision_strength_v1": 4.5,
            "decision_strength_v2": 3.3,
            "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
            "execution_confidence": 34,
            "extreme_disagreement": false,
            "final_verdict_audit": {
              "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
              "action_label": "Action",
              "decision": "No Primary Bet",
              "is_primary": false,
              "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Reims at 35.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 45.6%.",
              "why": [
                {
                  "text": "Decision Model identifies Reims as the value side (35.6%)",
                  "tone": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Edge does not clear Primary threshold",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
                  "tone": "bad"
                }
              ],
              "why_label": "Decision Summary"
            },
            "gap_pp": 10.0,
            "gates_failed": [
              "Execution confidence below 65"
            ],
            "has_top_pick": false,
            "headline": "No Primary Bet",
            "hero_mode": "default",
            "icon": "\u25cb",
            "label": "No Primary Bet",
            "market_signal": "The market has moved toward Montpellier, but the model still strongly favours Reims.",
            "model_conflict_detail": null,
            "model_lean": "Reims",
            "no_primary_reasons": {
              "all_triggered": [
                "market_conflict",
                "market_quality",
                "edge_low",
                "calibration_risk"
              ],
              "calibration_mode": "soft",
              "codes": [
                "market_conflict",
                "market_quality"
              ],
              "label": "Reason",
              "other_factors": [
                {
                  "code": "market_quality",
                  "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                  "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                  "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                  "tone": "warn"
                }
              ],
              "other_label": "Other factors",
              "primary": {
                "code": "market_conflict",
                "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
                "name": "Market Conflict",
                "short": "Market Conflict",
                "subtype": "drift_against_model",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "secondary": {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "version": "v1"
            },
            "outlier_detected": true,
            "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Reims \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.57 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +27% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1552484 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.57 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +4.7% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
            "primary_allowed": false,
            "primary_block_explain": {
              "entries": [
                {
                  "key": "weak_ev",
                  "label": "Consensus EV +4.7% \u003c Primary gate +5.0% (Lean gate +2.0% is separate \u2014 not Primary)",
                  "ok": false
                },
                {
                  "key": "gate",
                  "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
                  "ok": false
                }
              ],
              "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
              "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
              "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
              "title": "Why not Primary?"
            },
            "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +4.7% \u274c (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
            "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +4.7% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
            "primary_gates": {
              "items": [
                {
                  "key": "extreme_gap",
                  "label": "Extreme gap",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "no"
                },
                {
                  "key": "xg_calibration",
                  "label": "xG calibration",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "warning"
                },
                {
                  "key": "reliability",
                  "label": "Rel",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "77 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "execution",
                  "label": "Exec",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "34 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "alignment",
                  "label": "Align",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "conflict"
                },
                {
                  "key": "consensus_ev",
                  "label": "ConsEV",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "+4.7% (\u2265+5.0%)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "top_pick",
                  "label": "Pick",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "false"
                },
                {
                  "key": "validation",
                  "label": "Validation",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                }
              ],
              "passed": 4,
              "total": 8
            },
            "primary_type": null,
            "reasons": [
              "The market has moved toward Montpellier, but the model still strongly favours Reims.",
              "Decision strength: 3.0/10",
              "Execution confidence below 65",
              "Outlier price +27% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
            ],
            "reliability_score": 77,
            "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
            "strength_v2_breakdown": [
              "Base decision score (v1)",
              "Reliability supports action",
              "Market steam conflicts with model",
              "Thin consensus value",
              "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
            ],
            "subline": "The market has moved toward Montpellier, but the model still strongly favours Reims.",
            "thresholds": {
              "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
              "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
              "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
              "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
              "min_execution": 65,
              "min_reliability": 65,
              "min_strength": 7.0,
              "source": "db",
              "user_id": 2
            },
            "thresholds_source": "db",
            "thresholds_user_id": 2,
            "tier": "observe",
            "validation_ok": true,
            "value_context": {
              "consensus_ev": -0.1182,
              "consensus_ev_display": "-11.8%",
              "consensus_odds": 2.11,
              "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
              "disagreement_level": "moderate",
              "implied_prob": 0.4563,
              "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
              "model_prob": 0.3559,
              "raw_edge_display": "-10.0 percentage points",
              "raw_edge_pp": -10.0,
              "raw_implied_prob": 0.47393364928909953,
              "raw_signal_ev": -0.2491,
              "raw_signal_ev_display": "-24.9%"
            },
            "version": "v2.5",
            "xg_calibration": {
              "block_value_alert": true,
              "calibration_status": "warning",
              "deviation_pct": -3.0,
              "reasons": [
                "Low xG separation gap=0.02 (noise / no edge)"
              ],
              "recommended_action": "monitor",
              "strength_delta": -2.0,
              "uplift_away": null,
              "uplift_home": null,
              "xg_separation": {
                "band": "flat",
                "block_value_alert": true,
                "separation_score": -20,
                "strength_delta": -2.0,
                "xg_gap": 0.02
              }
            }
          },
          "headline": "No Primary Bet",
          "icon": "\u25cb",
          "label": "No Primary Bet",
          "subline": "The market has moved toward Montpellier, but the model still strongly favours Reims.",
          "tier": "observe"
        },
        "why": {
          "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
          "bullets": [
            "Model: Reims 1.31 xG vs Montpellier 1.29 \u2192 Reims 35.6%",
            "Market: Reims ~45.6% implied",
            "Market Steam: Montpellier \u2193 -26.7%"
          ],
          "one_liner": "Model favours Reims, but sharp money moved toward Montpellier.",
          "title": "Why?"
        }
      },
      "edge_rows": [
        {
          "edge_pp": -9.99,
          "fair_prob": 35.64,
          "label": "Reims",
          "market_prob": 45.63,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "home"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 1.58,
          "fair_prob": 29.65,
          "label": "Draw",
          "market_prob": 28.07,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "draw"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 8.4,
          "fair_prob": 34.7,
          "label": "Montpellier",
          "market_prob": 26.3,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "away"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -2.72,
          "fair_prob": 48.2,
          "label": "Over 2.5",
          "market_prob": 50.92,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "over"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 2.72,
          "fair_prob": 51.8,
          "label": "Under 2.5",
          "market_prob": 49.08,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "under"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -1.94,
          "fair_prob": 54.5,
          "label": "BTTS Yes",
          "market_prob": 56.44,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "yes"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 1.94,
          "fair_prob": 45.5,
          "label": "BTTS No",
          "market_prob": 43.56,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "no"
        }
      ],
      "edge_snapshot": {
        "edge_label": "mild_disagreement",
        "edge_pp": -9.99,
        "fair_prob_pct": 35.64,
        "hero_side": "home",
        "hero_team_name": "Reims",
        "market_prob_pct": 45.63,
        "status": "market_ahead",
        "steam_team_name": "Montpellier"
      },
      "fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
      "fair_vs_market": {
        "closing_capture": "PRE1",
        "closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "comparison_available": true,
        "comparison_disabled": false,
        "comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Reims\u0027s win probability at 45.6%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 35.6%, a difference of 10.0 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
        "degraded_note": "",
        "divergence_guard": {
          "divergence_level": "moderate",
          "edge_status": "market_ahead",
          "max_gap_pp": 9.99,
          "suppress_hero": false,
          "suppress_value_language": false
        },
        "divergence_label": "Moderate model-market divergence",
        "divergence_level": "moderate",
        "divergence_level_label": "Moderate divergence",
        "divergence_note": "Fair estimate and market pricing differ modestly. Monitor before kickoff.",
        "divergence_tier": "moderate",
        "edge_label": "Mild disagreement",
        "edge_label_key": "mild_disagreement",
        "fair_confidence": "medium",
        "fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
        "fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "forecast_assessment": {
          "favourite_class": "Balanced match",
          "favourite_label": "Reims",
          "forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
          "headline": "Balanced match",
          "market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
          "market_direction": {
            "label": "Conflicts with model",
            "positive": false
          },
          "market_prob_pct": 45.6,
          "model_prob_gap_display": "-10.0 percentage points",
          "model_prob_gap_pp": -10.0,
          "model_prob_pct": 35.6,
          "outcome_separation_tier": "low",
          "paragraphs": [],
          "pricing_convergence": {
            "gap_display": "-10.0 percentage points",
            "gap_pp": -10.0,
            "label": "Moderate",
            "label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
          },
          "reliability_headline": "Moderate reliability",
          "reliability_icon": "\u2713",
          "reliability_score": 77,
          "reliability_tier": "moderate",
          "summary": "The market has moved toward Montpellier, but the model still strongly favours Reims. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
          "tier": "balanced",
          "title": "Prediction Assessment",
          "validation_label": "Pass",
          "value_split": {
            "execution_confidence": {
              "label": "Monitoring Confidence",
              "score": 34,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "market_compatibility": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 17,
              "tier": "not_reliable",
              "tier_label": "Not reliable"
            },
            "model_edge_strength": {
              "label": "Model Signal Strength",
              "score": 35,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "model_value": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 17,
              "tier": "not_reliable",
              "tier_label": "Not reliable"
            },
            "recommendation": {
              "action": "no_bet",
              "label": "No Primary Bet"
            }
          },
          "why": {
            "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
            "bullets": [
              "Model: Reims 1.31 xG vs Montpellier 1.29 \u2192 Reims 35.6%",
              "Market: Reims ~45.6% implied",
              "Market Steam: Montpellier \u2193 -26.7%"
            ],
            "one_liner": "Model favours Reims, but sharp money moved toward Montpellier.",
            "title": "Why?"
          }
        },
        "forecast_certainty": {
          "note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
          "tier": "low",
          "tier_label": "Low"
        },
        "forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
        "has_market_probs": true,
        "hero_edge_pp": -9.99,
        "hero_label": "Reims",
        "hero_side": "home",
        "market_activity": "Montpellier odds shortened \u2193 -26.7%.",
        "market_agreement": "moderate",
        "market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
        "market_interpretation": {
          "bullets": [
            "Monitor line movement before kickoff \u2014 not a betting recommendation."
          ],
          "follow_up": "However, recent buying interest has been on Montpellier, with odds shortening by 26.7%.",
          "gap_tier": "mild",
          "lead": "The market and model broadly agree on Reims. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.",
          "note": "Buying interest on Montpellier \u2014 odds shortened by 26.7%.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The market and model broadly agree on Reims. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.",
            "However, recent buying interest has been on Montpellier, with odds shortening by 26.7%.",
            "Buying interest on Montpellier \u2014 odds shortened by 26.7%."
          ],
          "quiet_market": false,
          "title": "Market Assessment"
        },
        "market_narrative": {
          "paragraphs": [
            "The market still prices Reims above the current fair estimate.",
            "At the same time, Montpellier has attracted buying interest, with odds shortening by 26.7%.",
            "Broad sportsbook alignment (9/9) supports the current market view on Montpellier."
          ],
          "title": "Current Market Narrative"
        },
        "market_source": "closing_1x2",
        "max_gap_pp": 9.99,
        "model_validation": {
          "score_label_key": "mi_mv_pass",
          "status": "pass"
        },
        "model_validation_label": "Pass",
        "outcome_separation": {
          "breakdown": [
            "No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
            "Top two 1X2 outcomes within 0.9 percentage points."
          ],
          "lead_gap_pp": 0.9,
          "max_prob_pct": 35.6,
          "note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
          "tier": "low",
          "tier_label": "Low"
        },
        "outcome_separation_label": "Low",
        "overall_assessment": {
          "badge_class": "moderate",
          "largest_gap_label": "Reims",
          "largest_gap_pp": -10.0,
          "lead": "The closing market prices Reims higher than the statistical model.",
          "level": "moderate",
          "max_gap_pp": 10.0,
          "title": "Moderate Disagreement"
        },
        "rows": [
          {
            "difference_pp": -9.99,
            "edge_pp": -9.99,
            "fair_prob_pct": 35.64,
            "is_hero": true,
            "label": "Reims",
            "market_prob_pct": 45.63,
            "side": "home",
            "signal_key": "market_higher",
            "signal_label": "Market Higher"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": 1.58,
            "edge_pp": 1.58,
            "fair_prob_pct": 29.65,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Draw",
            "market_prob_pct": 28.07,
            "side": "draw",
            "signal_key": "aligned",
            "signal_label": "Aligned"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": 8.4,
            "edge_pp": 8.4,
            "fair_prob_pct": 34.7,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Montpellier",
            "market_prob_pct": 26.3,
            "side": "away",
            "signal_key": "model_higher",
            "signal_label": "Model Higher"
          }
        ],
        "status": "market_ahead",
        "status_label": "Market Ahead",
        "steam_note": "Buying interest on Montpellier \u2014 odds shortened by 26.7%.",
        "unavailable_note": ""
      },
      "interpretation": {
        "has_conflict": true,
        "paragraphs": [
          "The betting market strongly prefers Reims (45.6%).",
          "However, Montpellier has attracted one of the strongest multi-book steam moves of the day (\u2193 -26.7%, 9/9).",
          "This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Reims, Market \u2192 Reims, Recent sharp money \u2192 Montpellier.",
          "Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
        ],
        "show": true,
        "title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
      },
      "lifecycle": {
        "closing_implied_pct": 47.39,
        "closing_odds": 2.11,
        "closing_reason": "",
        "closing_status": "recorded",
        "closing_status_label": "Recorded",
        "clv_pending": true,
        "clv_pp": 0.0,
        "clv_reason": "",
        "clv_status": "pending",
        "context": "match",
        "current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
        "current_stage_detail": "",
        "current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
        "entry_implied_pct": 47.39,
        "entry_odds": 2.11,
        "match_phase": "upcoming",
        "match_phase_detail": "",
        "match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
        "match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
        "model_validation_label": "Pass",
        "model_validation_status": "pass",
        "stages": [
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "forecast_generated",
            "label": "Prediction Generated",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "market_detected",
            "label": "Market Compared",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "model_validated",
            "label": "Validation Passed",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "PRE1",
            "id": "closing_recorded",
            "label": "Closing Recorded",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "clv_evaluated",
            "label": "CLV Evaluated",
            "status": "pending"
          }
        ]
      },
      "market_move_intelligence": {
        "books_reacting": 9,
        "books_reacting_detail": [
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 8,
            "bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2193 -26.7%",
            "odds_delta_pct": -26.7
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 3,
            "bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2193 -19.2%",
            "odds_delta_pct": -19.2
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 7,
            "bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2193 -17.5%",
            "odds_delta_pct": -17.5
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 36,
            "bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2193 -17.1%",
            "odds_delta_pct": -17.1
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 5,
            "bookmaker_name": "SBO",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2193 -16.3%",
            "odds_delta_pct": -16.3
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 2,
            "bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2193 -15.7%",
            "odds_delta_pct": -15.7
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 11,
            "bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2193 -13.6%",
            "odds_delta_pct": -13.6
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 32,
            "bookmaker_name": "Betano",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2193 -13.1%",
            "odds_delta_pct": -13.1
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 4,
            "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2193 -12.0%",
            "odds_delta_pct": -12.0
          }
        ],
        "books_total": 9,
        "breadth_display": "9/9",
        "clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
        "clv_status": "evaluated",
        "current_odds": 3.3,
        "is_drift": false,
        "move_context": "Largest move today",
        "move_display": "\u2193 -26.7%",
        "move_pct_abs": 26.7,
        "move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
        "move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 92h 37m",
        "narrative_paragraphs": [
          "9/9 books synchronized on Montpellier (26.7% steam, score 99) \u2014 high-conviction multi-book repricing beats isolated ticks.",
          "Sharp sportsbooks led a meaningful repricing with broad market follow-through."
        ],
        "narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
        "odds_delta_pct": -26.7,
        "odds_path": {
          "chart_y_labels": [
            "4.50",
            "3.90",
            "3.30"
          ],
          "display": "4.50 \u2192 3.19 \u2192 3.30",
          "move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
          "move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 92h 37m",
          "pick_team": "Montpellier",
          "points": [
            {
              "label_key": "open",
              "value": "4.50"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "extreme",
              "value": "3.19"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "current",
              "value": "3.30"
            }
          ],
          "sparkline_points": [
            4.5,
            3.66,
            3.3
          ],
          "sparkline_polyline": "0.0,0.0 28.0,12.6 56.0,18.0",
          "sparkline_trend": "down",
          "sparkline_trend_label": "One-way drop",
          "summary_boxes": [
            {
              "label_key": "open",
              "value": "4.50"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "low",
              "value": "3.30"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "high",
              "value": "4.50"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "current",
              "value": "3.30"
            }
          ]
        },
        "open_odds": 4.5,
        "page_alert_line": "Sharp money alert: Montpellier \u2193 -26.7% market move detected",
        "phase_label": "Sharp repricing",
        "phase_tip": "Aggressive adjustment \u2014 often sharp-led or high consensus.",
        "pick_team": "Montpellier",
        "ref_book": "Bet365",
        "seo_title_alert": "Sharp money alert: Montpellier \u2193 -26.7% market move detected",
        "sharp_leader": "Bet365",
        "show": true,
        "signal_badge_class": "steam",
        "signal_icon": "\ud83d\udd25",
        "signal_impact": {
          "current_odds": 3.3,
          "is_drift": false,
          "label": "Sharp signal",
          "move_display": "\u2193 -26.7%",
          "open_odds": 4.5,
          "summary": "Market moved toward Montpellier while the model still favours another side.",
          "team": "Montpellier",
          "tone": "against"
        },
        "signal_key": "strong_steam",
        "signal_label": "Strong steam",
        "steam_score": 99,
        "steam_subtitle": "Strong multi-book steam",
        "steam_tier": "A+",
        "title": "Market Move Intelligence"
      },
      "market_overview": {
        "breadth_display": "9/9",
        "current_odds": 3.3,
        "move_display": "\u2193 -26.7%",
        "open_odds": 4.5,
        "pick_team": "Montpellier",
        "steam_score": 99,
        "steam_team_name": "Montpellier",
        "steam_tier": "A+"
      },
      "premium_teaser": {
        "current_divergence_pp": 10.0,
        "divergence_label": "Current divergence",
        "title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
        "unlock_items": [
          "Historical similar matches",
          "Closing odds analysis",
          "CLV tracking",
          "Sharp money signals",
          "Market efficiency rating",
          "Historical model vs market results"
        ],
        "unlock_label": "Unlock"
      },
      "show": true
    },
    "match": {
      "at2.away_team_slug": "montpellier",
      "away_expected_goals": null,
      "away_goal_display": null,
      "away_team_display_name": "Montpellier",
      "away_team_id": 82,
      "away_team_logo": "/static/teams/82.webp",
      "away_team_name": "Montpellier",
      "away_team_public_id": "31J3Wk0UuS1Yoi",
      "away_team_slug": "montpellier",
      "country_code": "FR",
      "country_display_name": "France",
      "country_flag": "/static/images/country/fr.svg",
      "country_id": 56,
      "country_name": "France",
      "fixture_id": 1552484,
      "goals_away": null,
      "goals_home": null,
      "home_expected_goals": null,
      "home_goal_display": null,
      "home_team_country": "France",
      "home_team_display_name": "Reims",
      "home_team_id": 93,
      "home_team_logo": "/static/teams/93.webp",
      "home_team_name": "Reims",
      "home_team_public_id": "4GqETs33z6oRQT",
      "home_team_slug": "reims",
      "ht.home_team_slug": "reims",
      "league_country": "France",
      "league_country_display": "France",
      "league_display_name": "Ligue 2",
      "league_id": 62,
      "league_logo": "/static/leagues/62.webp",
      "league_name": "Ligue 2",
      "league_public_id": "0evsbGwHhHZb70",
      "league_season": 2026,
      "match_date": "2026-09-18 18:00:00",
      "public_id": "0EV5TYK4OGVCCj",
      "score_fulltime_away": null,
      "score_fulltime_home": null,
      "score_penalty_away": null,
      "score_penalty_home": null,
      "status_long": "Not Started",
      "status_short": "NS",
      "venue_city": "Reims",
      "venue_name": "Stade Auguste-Delaune"
    },
    "match_decision": {
      "confidence": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
          "pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
          "pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
          "Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
          "At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
        ],
        "score": 6.0
      },
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
          "away": {
            "alpha": 0.2621,
            "best_odd": 3.66,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.0221,
            "ev": 0.0435,
            "implied_prob": 0.263,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.263,
              "draw": 0.2807,
              "home": 0.4563
            },
            "model_prob": 0.3473,
            "p_final": 0.2851
          },
          "draw": {
            "alpha": 0.2928,
            "best_odd": 3.43,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.0047,
            "ev": -0.0211,
            "implied_prob": 0.2807,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.263,
              "draw": 0.2807,
              "home": 0.4563
            },
            "model_prob": 0.2968,
            "p_final": 0.2854
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "alpha": 0.3823,
            "best_odd": 2.11,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.0384,
            "ev": -0.1182,
            "implied_prob": 0.4563,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.263,
              "draw": 0.2807,
              "home": 0.4563
            },
            "model_prob": 0.3559,
            "p_final": 0.4179
          }
        },
        "1x2_outlier": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
          "away": {
            "best_odd": 3.66,
            "edge": 0.0741,
            "ev": 0.271,
            "implied_prob": 0.2732,
            "model_prob": 0.3473
          },
          "draw": {
            "best_odd": 3.43,
            "edge": 0.0052,
            "ev": 0.018,
            "implied_prob": 0.2915,
            "model_prob": 0.2968
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "best_odd": 2.11,
            "edge": -0.118,
            "ev": -0.249,
            "implied_prob": 0.4739,
            "model_prob": 0.3559
          }
        },
        "btts": {
          "alpha_no": 0.2194,
          "alpha_yes": 0.2414,
          "best_no_odd": 2.3,
          "best_yes_odd": 1.7,
          "btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
          "edge_no": 0.0194,
          "edge_yes": -0.0194,
          "ev_available": true,
          "ev_no": 0.0465,
          "ev_no_risk_adj": -0.0715,
          "ev_yes": -0.0735,
          "ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0857,
          "implied_no": 0.4356,
          "implied_yes": 0.5644,
          "market_first": {
            "available": true,
            "mode": "market_first_btts",
            "n_bookmakers": 7,
            "no": {
              "alpha": 0.2194,
              "best_odd": 2.1,
              "edge": 0.0036,
              "ev": -0.0715,
              "implied_prob": 0.4385,
              "model_prob": 0.455,
              "p_final": 0.4421
            },
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "yes": {
              "alpha": 0.2414,
              "best_odd": 1.64,
              "edge": -0.004,
              "ev": -0.0857,
              "implied_prob": 0.5615,
              "model_prob": 0.545,
              "p_final": 0.5575
            }
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 7,
          "p_final_no": 0.4421,
          "p_final_yes": 0.5575,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "reliability": "medium"
        },
        "ou25": {
          "alpha_over": 0.2266,
          "alpha_under": 0.2266,
          "best_over_odd": 1.95,
          "best_under_odd": 2.02,
          "consensus_over_odd": 1.85,
          "consensus_under_odd": 1.92,
          "edge_over": -0.0272,
          "edge_under": 0.0272,
          "ev_available": true,
          "ev_over": -0.0601,
          "ev_over_risk_adj": -0.0693,
          "ev_under": 0.0464,
          "ev_under_risk_adj": -0.046,
          "implied_over": 0.5092,
          "implied_over_mf": 0.5093,
          "implied_under": 0.4908,
          "implied_under_mf": 0.4907,
          "market_first": {
            "available": true,
            "mode": "market_first_ou",
            "n_bookmakers": 8,
            "over": {
              "alpha": 0.2266,
              "best_odd": 1.85,
              "edge": -0.0062,
              "ev": -0.0693,
              "implied_prob": 0.5093,
              "model_prob": 0.482,
              "p_final": 0.5031
            },
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "under": {
              "alpha": 0.2266,
              "best_odd": 1.92,
              "edge": 0.0062,
              "ev": -0.046,
              "implied_prob": 0.4907,
              "model_prob": 0.518,
              "p_final": 0.4969
            }
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 8,
          "ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
          "p_final_over": 0.5031,
          "p_final_under": 0.4969,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "reliability": "medium"
        }
      },
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "avoid",
        "code": "no_edge",
        "execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
        "insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
        "stake_mult": 0.0,
        "use_split_strip": true
      },
      "match_tier": "no_bet",
      "min_ev": 0.02,
      "total_xg": 2.6,
      "variance_flag": false
    },
    "unified_decision": {
      "actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
      "algorithm": {
        "enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
        "game_typing_module": true,
        "version": "2.5.0"
      },
      "balanced_alternative": null,
      "best_consensus_ev": 0.0465,
      "best_outlier_ev": 0.271,
      "best_tracked_ev": 0.0465,
      "confidence": 4.5,
      "decision_confidence_v1": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
          "pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
          "Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
        ],
        "breakdown_v2": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Thin consensus value",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "score": 3.0,
        "score_v1_legacy": 4.5,
        "score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.3,
        "strength_v2": true
      },
      "decision_strength_v2": {
        "breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Thin consensus value",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "score": 3.0,
        "score_pre_penalty": 3.3
      },
      "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
      "execution": {
        "1x2_dominant": false,
        "1x2_open_contest": true,
        "grade": "C",
        "stake_factor": 0.0
      },
      "favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
        "active": false,
        "gap": null,
        "side": null
      },
      "final_action": "no_bet",
      "final_decision": {
        "action": "no_bet",
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": true,
          "direction_key": "agree",
          "gap_pp": 10.0,
          "key": "conflict",
          "label": "Disagree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 10.0,
          "summary": "The market has moved toward Montpellier, but the model still strongly favours Reims."
        },
        "alignment_key": "conflict",
        "best_consensus_ev": 0.0465,
        "best_outlier_ev": 0.271,
        "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
        "decision_strength": 3.0,
        "decision_strength_v1": 4.5,
        "decision_strength_v2": 3.3,
        "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
        "execution_confidence": 34,
        "extreme_disagreement": false,
        "final_verdict_audit": {
          "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
          "action_label": "Action",
          "decision": "No Primary Bet",
          "is_primary": false,
          "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Reims at 35.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 45.6%.",
          "why": [
            {
              "text": "Decision Model identifies Reims as the value side (35.6%)",
              "tone": "ok"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Edge does not clear Primary threshold",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
              "tone": "bad"
            }
          ],
          "why_label": "Decision Summary"
        },
        "gap_pp": 10.0,
        "gates_failed": [
          "Execution confidence below 65"
        ],
        "has_top_pick": false,
        "headline": "No Primary Bet",
        "hero_mode": "default",
        "icon": "\u25cb",
        "label": "No Primary Bet",
        "market_signal": "The market has moved toward Montpellier, but the model still strongly favours Reims.",
        "model_conflict_detail": null,
        "model_lean": "Reims",
        "no_primary_reasons": {
          "all_triggered": [
            "market_conflict",
            "market_quality",
            "edge_low",
            "calibration_risk"
          ],
          "calibration_mode": "soft",
          "codes": [
            "market_conflict",
            "market_quality"
          ],
          "label": "Reason",
          "other_factors": [
            {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            }
          ],
          "other_label": "Other factors",
          "primary": {
            "code": "market_conflict",
            "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
            "name": "Market Conflict",
            "short": "Market Conflict",
            "subtype": "drift_against_model",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "secondary": {
            "code": "market_quality",
            "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
            "name": "Market Quality Risk",
            "short": "Market Quality Risk",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "version": "v1"
        },
        "outlier_detected": true,
        "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Reims \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.57 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +27% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1552484 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.57 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +4.7% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
        "primary_allowed": false,
        "primary_block_explain": {
          "entries": [
            {
              "key": "weak_ev",
              "label": "Consensus EV +4.7% \u003c Primary gate +5.0% (Lean gate +2.0% is separate \u2014 not Primary)",
              "ok": false
            },
            {
              "key": "gate",
              "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
              "ok": false
            }
          ],
          "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
          "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
          "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
          "title": "Why not Primary?"
        },
        "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +4.7% \u274c (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
        "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +4.7% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
        "primary_gates": {
          "items": [
            {
              "key": "extreme_gap",
              "label": "Extreme gap",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "no"
            },
            {
              "key": "xg_calibration",
              "label": "xG calibration",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "warning"
            },
            {
              "key": "reliability",
              "label": "Rel",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "77 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "execution",
              "label": "Exec",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "34 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "alignment",
              "label": "Align",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "conflict"
            },
            {
              "key": "consensus_ev",
              "label": "ConsEV",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "+4.7% (\u2265+5.0%)"
            },
            {
              "key": "top_pick",
              "label": "Pick",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "false"
            },
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            }
          ],
          "passed": 4,
          "total": 8
        },
        "primary_type": null,
        "reasons": [
          "The market has moved toward Montpellier, but the model still strongly favours Reims.",
          "Decision strength: 3.0/10",
          "Execution confidence below 65",
          "Outlier price +27% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
        ],
        "reliability_score": 77,
        "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
        "strength_v2_breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Thin consensus value",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "subline": "The market has moved toward Montpellier, but the model still strongly favours Reims.",
        "thresholds": {
          "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
          "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
          "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
          "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
          "min_execution": 65,
          "min_reliability": 65,
          "min_strength": 7.0,
          "source": "db",
          "user_id": 2
        },
        "thresholds_source": "db",
        "thresholds_user_id": 2,
        "tier": "observe",
        "validation_ok": true,
        "value_context": {
          "consensus_ev": -0.1182,
          "consensus_ev_display": "-11.8%",
          "consensus_odds": 2.11,
          "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
          "disagreement_level": "moderate",
          "implied_prob": 0.4563,
          "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
          "model_prob": 0.3559,
          "raw_edge_display": "-10.0 percentage points",
          "raw_edge_pp": -10.0,
          "raw_implied_prob": 0.47393364928909953,
          "raw_signal_ev": -0.2491,
          "raw_signal_ev_display": "-24.9%"
        },
        "version": "v2.5",
        "xg_calibration": {
          "block_value_alert": true,
          "calibration_status": "warning",
          "deviation_pct": -3.0,
          "reasons": [
            "Low xG separation gap=0.02 (noise / no edge)"
          ],
          "recommended_action": "monitor",
          "strength_delta": -2.0,
          "uplift_away": null,
          "uplift_home": null,
          "xg_separation": {
            "band": "flat",
            "block_value_alert": true,
            "separation_score": -20,
            "strength_delta": -2.0,
            "xg_gap": 0.02
          }
        }
      },
      "game_type": {
        "label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
        "scoring_type": "balanced",
        "signals": {
          "btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
          "draw_prob": 0.2968,
          "max_1x2_prob": 0.3559,
          "over_prob": 0.482,
          "total_xg": 2.6,
          "under_prob": 0.518,
          "xg_diff": 0.02
        },
        "type": "balanced",
        "typing_weights_enabled": true
      },
      "hero_display_pick": {
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "ev": 0.0465,
        "hero_display_only": true,
        "implied_prob": 0.4356,
        "market": "btts",
        "model_prob": 0.455,
        "not_dominant": true,
        "risk_band": "medium",
        "risk_tier": "hero_display",
        "side": "no",
        "slot": "hero_display"
      },
      "hero_mode": "default",
      "longshot_picks": [
        {
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "ev": 0.0435,
          "implied_prob": 0.263,
          "market": "1x2",
          "model_prob": 0.3473,
          "not_dominant": true,
          "risk_band": "speculative",
          "risk_tier": "longshot",
          "side": "away",
          "side_label": "Montpellier",
          "slot": "longshot"
        }
      ],
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "consensus_odds": 2.11,
          "decision": "no_bet",
          "edge": -0.0384,
          "ev": -0.1182,
          "implied_prob": 0.4563,
          "max_ev_side": "away",
          "model_prob": 0.3559,
          "side": "home",
          "side_label": "Reims"
        },
        "btts": {
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "decision_layer": {
            "alpha": 0.2194,
            "available": true,
            "consensus_odds": 2.1,
            "edge": 0.0036,
            "market_prob": 0.4385,
            "mode": "market_first_btts",
            "model_prob": 0.455,
            "n_bookmakers": 7,
            "no": {
              "alpha": 0.2194,
              "best_odd": 2.1,
              "edge": 0.0036,
              "ev": -0.0715,
              "implied_prob": 0.4385,
              "model_prob": 0.455,
              "p_final": 0.4421
            },
            "p_final": 0.4421,
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "risk_adj_ev": -0.0715,
            "value_side": "no",
            "yes": {
              "alpha": 0.2414,
              "best_odd": 1.64,
              "edge": -0.004,
              "ev": -0.0857,
              "implied_prob": 0.5615,
              "model_prob": 0.545,
              "p_final": 0.5575
            }
          },
          "edge": 0.0194,
          "ev": 0.0465,
          "implied_prob": 0.4356,
          "model_prob": 0.455,
          "side": "no",
          "value_side": "no"
        },
        "ou_2_5": {
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "decision_layer": {
            "alpha": 0.2266,
            "available": true,
            "consensus_odds": 1.92,
            "edge": 0.0062,
            "market_prob": 0.4907,
            "mode": "market_first_ou",
            "model_prob": 0.518,
            "n_bookmakers": 8,
            "over": {
              "alpha": 0.2266,
              "best_odd": 1.85,
              "edge": -0.0062,
              "ev": -0.0693,
              "implied_prob": 0.5093,
              "model_prob": 0.482,
              "p_final": 0.5031
            },
            "p_final": 0.4969,
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "risk_adj_ev": -0.046,
            "under": {
              "alpha": 0.2266,
              "best_odd": 1.92,
              "edge": 0.0062,
              "ev": -0.046,
              "implied_prob": 0.4907,
              "model_prob": 0.518,
              "p_final": 0.4969
            },
            "value_side": "under"
          },
          "edge": 0.0272,
          "ev": 0.0464,
          "implied_prob": 0.4908,
          "model_prob": 0.518,
          "side": "under",
          "value_side": "under"
        }
      },
      "match_id": 1552484,
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "optional",
        "actionable": false,
        "clear_edge": false,
        "code": "thin_edge",
        "execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
        "insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
        "max_valid_ev": 0.0465,
        "min_ev": 0.02,
        "stake_mult": 0.25,
        "use_split_strip": true
      },
      "match_tier": "value_game",
      "no_clear_primary": false,
      "probabilities": {
        "away": 0.3473,
        "draw": 0.2968,
        "home": 0.3559
      },
      "reason_codes": [
        "no_ev_1x2",
        "longshot_high_variance"
      ],
      "secondary_pick": null,
      "secondary_picks": [],
      "show_betting_primary_label": false,
      "suppressed_primary": null,
      "teams": {
        "away": "Montpellier",
        "home": "Reims"
      },
      "top_pick": null,
      "valid_markets_count": 3,
      "value_context_1x2": {
        "consensus_ev": -0.1182,
        "consensus_ev_display": "-11.8%",
        "consensus_odds": 2.11,
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "implied_prob": 0.4563,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "model_prob": 0.3559,
        "raw_edge_display": "-10.0 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": -10.0,
        "raw_implied_prob": 0.47393364928909953,
        "raw_signal_ev": -0.2491,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "-24.9%"
      }
    }
  },
  "fixture_id": 1552484,
  "generated_at_utc": "2026-09-18T18:00:50.059855+00:00",
  "lang_id": "en"
}

Dapatkan Ramalan Premium untuk Reims & Montpellier!

Buka analisis mendalam, tip pertaruhan eksklusif, dan ramalan perlawanan dengan perkhidmatan langganan premium kami.

Langgan Sekarang
Kembali ke Statistik
Ligue 2 Ligue 2 — Kedudukan
# PASUKAN P M S K Mata
1 Saint Etienne 7 5 1 1 16
2 RED Star FC 93 7 4 2 1 14
3 Reims 7 3 4 0 13
4 Montpellier 7 3 3 1 12
5 Metz 7 2 4 1 10
6 AS Nancy 7 3 1 3 10
7 Annecy 7 3 1 3 10
8 Sochaux 7 2 4 1 10
9 Dijon 7 2 3 2 9
10 PAU FC 7 2 2 3 8
11 Guingamp 7 2 2 3 8
12 Dunkerque 7 2 2 3 8
13 Grenoble 7 2 2 3 8
14 Rodez 7 2 1 4 7
15 Nantes 7 2 1 4 7
16 Clermont Foot 7 0 6 1 6
17 Boulogne 7 0 5 2 5
18 Laval 7 1 2 4 5
# PASUKAN P J B +/- Mata
1 Saint Etienne 7 19 8 +11 16
2 Reims 7 15 9 +6 13
3 Rodez 7 14 16 -2 7
4 Metz 7 10 7 +3 10
5 Dijon 7 10 10 0 9
6 Guingamp 7 10 12 -2 8
7 Dunkerque 7 10 12 -2 8
8 RED Star FC 93 7 9 7 +2 14
9 Annecy 7 9 9 0 10
10 Nantes 7 9 13 -4 7
11 AS Nancy 7 8 7 +1 10
12 Grenoble 7 8 11 -3 8
13 Laval 7 8 14 -6 5
14 Montpellier 7 6 5 +1 12
15 PAU FC 7 6 6 0 8
16 Sochaux 7 4 5 -1 10
17 Clermont Foot 7 4 6 -2 6
18 Boulogne 7 3 5 -2 5