Statistik / Bola Sepak / Denmark. Divisyen 1 Denmark / Aalborg BK vs Vendsyssel FF

Aalborg BK vs Vendsyssel FF Statistics & Analysis

Sep 20, 2026 - 12:00
2 1.37
2 1.23
xG Accuracy: 68%
Laman pertaruhan premium stake: pengguna baharu boleh guna kod promo FHn2uDc1. Daftar sekarang

Pasaran yang dijejaki vs hasil sepenuh masa

Setiap baris membandingkan model pra-perlawanan lean dengan keputusan sepenuh masa.

  • Pasaran Ramalan Hasilnya Hasil
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 matlamat) ✖ tak betul
  • Kedua-dua Pasukan Menjaringkan Gol BTTS Tidak Ya ✖ tak betul
  • 1X2 Aalborg BK Lukis ✖ tak betul
  • Cerapan skor tepat 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 2-2 ✖ tak betul

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 14, 2026 · 01:17 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-8665357

Closing Odds 1.88
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Draw · Aalborg BK 2–2 Vendsyssel FF
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Intelijen pasaran

Bacaan selepas pilihan utama: bagaimana suapan penutup berprioriti bergerak berbanding model.

Ringkasan pasaran

Pasaran kekal stabil menjelang sepakan. Tiada anjakan implied ketara antara PRE30 dan PRE1 pada snapshot berprioriti.

Walaupun pergerakan lewat kecil, model masih menilai Lukis (1X2),Vendsyssel FF (1X2),Bawah 2.5 gol jauh melebihi implied snapshot penutupan — bacaan statik "model vs harga", bukan kejaran steam.

Model masih melebihi implied penutupan pada Vendsyssel FF (1X2) kira-kira 8.5 mata peratus — isyarat salah harga paling jelas pada halaman ini.

Model vs implied penutup

Pasaran Model % Implied penutup % Jurang (pp)
Aalborg BK (1X2) 38.5 50.7 -12.3
Lukis (1X2) 29.6 25.8 +3.8
Vendsyssel FF (1X2) 31.9 23.5 +8.5
Lebih 2.5 gol 48.2 52.2 -4.0
Bawah 2.5 gol 51.8 47.8 +4.0
Apa maksudnya

Secara ringkas: model kira-kira 31.9% pada Vendsyssel FF (1X2), manakala snapshot penutup menunjukkan kira-kira 23.5%. Bezanya — kira-kira 8.5 mata peratus — ialah jurang model-vs-pasaran terbesar yang ditonjolkan di halaman ini.

Ringkas: "implied penutup" ialah kebarangkalian terbit daripada odds akhir yang ditangkap (selepas de-vig ringkas). "Jurang (pp)" = peratus model tolak implied tersebut, dalam mata peratus (pp).

Pergerakan garisan menjelang sepakan mula

Satu buku prioriti setiap snapshot (bukan semua). Laluan tangkapan: PRE30 → PRE1 · Buku: Pinnacle

Dalam kurungan pada lajur: Penutup = snapshot pertama tersedia ikut PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Awal = pertama dalam PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 yang berbeza daripada Penutup.

Odds terperinci dilipat di bawah — pergerakan implied (de-vig) boleh diabaikan.

Lihat jadual penuh baris demi baris
Pasaran Awal (PRE30) Penutup (PRE1) Δ tersirat (pp)
Aalborg BK (1X2) 1.88 1.88 0.0
Lukis (1X2) 3.7 3.7 0.0
Vendsyssel FF (1X2) 4.06 4.06 0.0
Lebih 2.5 gol 1.84 1.84 0.0
Bawah 2.5 gol 2.01 2.01 0.0

Taklimat AI untuk perlawanan ini belum tersedia. Selepas naik taraf pelayan, jalankan semula “Batch generate odds” untuk menjana ringkasan.

View technical JSON
{
  "bundle_version": 1,
  "content_hash": "1e34c59327e45ee1028180c9465066cdc43a33fd65f199be246838909fb7bb5f",
  "decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
  "facts": {
    "ai_fp": {
      "away_predicted_xg": 1.23,
      "away_win_prob": 0.3194,
      "away_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "bayes_applied": 0,
      "btts_no_prob": 0.456,
      "btts_yes_prob": 0.544,
      "dc_rho": -0.13,
      "draw_prob": 0.2957,
      "draw_prob_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_away": 3.13,
      "fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_draw": 3.38,
      "fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_home": 2.6,
      "fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
      "home_predicted_xg": 1.37,
      "home_win_prob": 0.3849,
      "home_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "over_25_prob": 0.482,
      "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
      "under_25_prob": 0.518
    },
    "api_prediction": {
      "advice": "Double chance : Aalborg BK or draw",
      "main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
      "percent_away": "10%",
      "percent_draw": "45%",
      "percent_home": "45%",
      "winner_name": "Aalborg BK"
    },
    "away_xg": 1.23,
    "betting_insight": {
      "bet_label": "Aalborg BK",
      "confidence": null,
      "main_pick_meta": {
        "confidence": "low",
        "display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
        "edge": -0.1227,
        "edge_gap": 0.0651,
        "market": "1X2",
        "market_prob": 0.5073,
        "model_prob": 0.3846,
        "pick_type": "no_strong",
        "probabilities": {
          "away": 32.0,
          "draw": 29.6,
          "home": 38.5
        },
        "reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
        "selection": null,
        "selection_name": null
      },
      "market_comparison": [
        {
          "affi_link": "",
          "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
          "odd": 1.88
        }
      ],
      "risk_color": null,
      "risk_key": null,
      "stacked_market": null,
      "value_bet": {
        "best_odds": 1.88,
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "display_market": "Aalborg BK Win",
        "is_value": false,
        "label": "Home",
        "market_fair_odds": 1.97,
        "market_odds": 1.88,
        "model_odds": 2.6,
        "overround": 4.8,
        "prob_edge": -14.7,
        "value_pct": -27.7,
        "value_rating": "no_value"
      }
    },
    "betting_markets": {
      "btts": {
        "away_clean_sheet": 3,
        "away_failed_to_score": 2,
        "away_played": 8,
        "away_score_rate": 70.8,
        "home_clean_sheet": 3,
        "home_failed_to_score": 2,
        "home_played": 8,
        "home_score_rate": 74.6,
        "no_prob": 45.6,
        "pick": "Yes",
        "pick_prob": 54.4,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": false,
        "yes_prob": 54.4
      },
      "correct_score": {
        "away_expected": 1.23,
        "home_expected": 1.37,
        "scores": [
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-1",
            "prob": 12.5
          },
          {
            "away": 0,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-0",
            "prob": 10.2
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 0,
            "label": "0-1",
            "prob": 9.1
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 2,
            "label": "2-1",
            "prob": 8.6
          },
          {
            "away": 2,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-2",
            "prob": 7.7
          }
        ],
        "source": "xG"
      },
      "double_chance": {
        "options": [
          {
            "key": "1X",
            "label": "Aalborg BK or Draw",
            "prob": 68.1
          },
          {
            "key": "12",
            "label": "Aalborg BK or Vendsyssel FF",
            "prob": 70.4
          },
          {
            "key": "X2",
            "label": "Draw or Vendsyssel FF",
            "prob": 61.5
          }
        ],
        "pick_key": "12",
        "pick_label": "Aalborg BK or Vendsyssel FF",
        "pick_prob": 70.4
      },
      "match_winner": {
        "away_pct": 31.9,
        "draw_pct": 29.6,
        "home_pct": 38.5,
        "lean_key": "home",
        "lean_label": "Aalborg BK"
      },
      "over_under": {
        "api_hint": null,
        "avg_total": 2.6,
        "away_avg_scored": 1.0,
        "confidence": "low",
        "home_avg_scored": 1.1,
        "over_prob": 48.2,
        "pick": "Under 2.5",
        "pick_prob": 51.8,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": true,
        "total_expected": 2.6,
        "under_prob": 51.8
      },
      "prob_source": "poisson",
      "value_bet_enhanced": {
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "edge": 29.5,
        "implied_prob": 24.6,
        "is_value": true,
        "label": "Away",
        "market": "Vendsyssel FF Win",
        "model_prob": 31.9,
        "odds": 4.06
      }
    },
    "closing_line_bundle": {
      "away_team": "Vendsyssel FF",
      "closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
        "away": 23.49,
        "draw": 25.78,
        "home": 50.73
      },
      "closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "closing_capture": "PRE1",
      "closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-20 12:00:02",
      "early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "early_capture": "PRE30",
      "early_fetched_at": "2026-09-20 11:31:41",
      "has_data": true,
      "home_team": "Aalborg BK",
      "largest_move_kind": null,
      "max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
      "model_vs_closing": [
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 50.73,
          "gap_pp": -12.27,
          "kind": "1x2_h",
          "model_pct": 38.46
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 25.78,
          "gap_pp": 3.81,
          "kind": "1x2_d",
          "model_pct": 29.59
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 23.49,
          "gap_pp": 8.46,
          "kind": "1x2_a",
          "model_pct": 31.95
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 52.21,
          "gap_pp": -4.01,
          "kind": "ou_o",
          "model_pct": 48.2
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 47.79,
          "gap_pp": 4.01,
          "kind": "ou_u",
          "model_pct": 51.8
        }
      ],
      "movement": [
        {
          "closing": 1.88,
          "early": 1.88,
          "implied_closing_pct": 50.73,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 50.73,
          "kind": "1x2_h"
        },
        {
          "closing": 3.7,
          "early": 3.7,
          "implied_closing_pct": 25.78,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 25.78,
          "kind": "1x2_d"
        },
        {
          "closing": 4.06,
          "early": 4.06,
          "implied_closing_pct": 23.49,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 23.49,
          "kind": "1x2_a"
        },
        {
          "closing": 1.84,
          "early": 1.84,
          "implied_closing_pct": 52.21,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 52.21,
          "kind": "ou_o"
        },
        {
          "closing": 2.01,
          "early": 2.01,
          "implied_closing_pct": 47.79,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 47.79,
          "kind": "ou_u"
        }
      ],
      "movement_negligible": true,
      "same_bookmaker": true,
      "top_value_gap": {
        "gap_pp": 8.5,
        "kind": "1x2_a"
      }
    },
    "correct_score_insight": {
      "best_value": null,
      "lean_card": {
        "diff_pp": -1.8,
        "ev": -0.125,
        "has_edge": false,
        "label": "1-1",
        "market_odds": 7.0,
        "market_prob": 0.1429,
        "market_prob_pct": 14.3,
        "model_prob": 0.125,
        "model_prob_pct": 12.5,
        "n_bookmakers": 8,
        "status_key": "no_value"
      },
      "most_likely": {
        "label": "1-1",
        "prob": 12.5
      },
      "top5": [
        {
          "label": "1-1",
          "prob": 12.5
        },
        {
          "label": "1-0",
          "prob": 10.2
        },
        {
          "label": "0-1",
          "prob": 9.1
        },
        {
          "label": "2-1",
          "prob": 8.6
        },
        {
          "label": "1-2",
          "prob": 7.7
        }
      ]
    },
    "home_xg": 1.37,
    "homepage_pick": null,
    "market_cards": [
      {
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "decision_layer": {
          "alpha": 0.2228,
          "available": true,
          "consensus_odds": 1.95,
          "edge": 0.0085,
          "edge_pp": 0.9,
          "market_prob": 0.48,
          "mode": "market_first_ou",
          "model_prob": 0.518,
          "n_bookmakers": 8,
          "over": {
            "alpha": 0.2228,
            "best_odd": 1.8,
            "edge": -0.0085,
            "ev": -0.0792,
            "implied_prob": 0.52,
            "model_prob": 0.482,
            "p_final": 0.5115
          },
          "p_final": 0.4885,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "raw_edge_pp": 3.8,
          "raw_signal_ev": 0.0101,
          "risk_adj_ev": -0.0475,
          "under": {
            "alpha": 0.2228,
            "best_odd": 1.95,
            "edge": 0.0085,
            "ev": -0.0475,
            "implied_prob": 0.48,
            "model_prob": 0.518,
            "p_final": 0.4885
          },
          "value_side": "under"
        },
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_over": -0.0938,
        "ev_over_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -9.4,
          "text": "-9.4%"
        },
        "ev_under": 0.0878,
        "ev_under_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 8.8,
          "text": "+8.8%"
        },
        "featured": true,
        "id": "ou_2_5",
        "max_ev": 0.0878,
        "n_bookmakers": 8,
        "over_prob": 48.2,
        "sort_key": 10229.02,
        "tier": "best",
        "under_prob": 51.8,
        "value_side": "under"
      },
      {
        "authority_action": "no_bet",
        "authority_note": "The market has moved away from Aalborg BK, but the model still strongly favours Aalborg BK.",
        "consensus_odds": 1.88,
        "decision": "no_bet",
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "ev": -0.1592,
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -15.9,
          "text": "-15.9%"
        },
        "featured": false,
        "id": "1x2",
        "implied_prob": 0.5073,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "max_ev": 0.0137,
        "max_ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 1.4,
          "text": "+1.4%"
        },
        "model_prob": 0.3846,
        "raw_edge_display": "-12.3 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": -12.3,
        "raw_signal_ev": -0.277,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "-27.7%",
        "show_primary_label": false,
        "side_label": "Aalborg BK",
        "sort_key": 5210.96,
        "tier": "lean"
      },
      {
        "decision": "small_edge",
        "decision_layer": {
          "alpha": 0.2205,
          "available": true,
          "consensus_odds": 2.09,
          "edge": 0.0029,
          "edge_pp": 0.3,
          "market_prob": 0.4427,
          "mode": "market_first_btts",
          "model_prob": 0.456,
          "n_bookmakers": 7,
          "no": {
            "alpha": 0.2205,
            "best_odd": 2.09,
            "edge": 0.0029,
            "ev": -0.0687,
            "implied_prob": 0.4427,
            "model_prob": 0.456,
            "p_final": 0.4456
          },
          "p_final": 0.4456,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "raw_edge_pp": 1.3,
          "raw_signal_ev": -0.047,
          "risk_adj_ev": -0.0687,
          "value_side": "no",
          "yes": {
            "alpha": 0.2426,
            "best_odd": 1.66,
            "edge": -0.0032,
            "ev": -0.0802,
            "implied_prob": 0.5573,
            "model_prob": 0.544,
            "p_final": 0.5541
          }
        },
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_no": 0.0032,
        "ev_no_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 0.3,
          "text": "+0.3%"
        },
        "ev_yes": -0.0915,
        "ev_yes_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -9.2,
          "text": "-9.2%"
        },
        "featured": false,
        "id": "btts",
        "max_ev": 0.0032,
        "n_bookmakers": 7,
        "no_prob": 45.6,
        "sort_key": 5202.56,
        "tier": "lean",
        "value_side": "no",
        "yes_prob": 54.4
      },
      {
        "featured": false,
        "id": "correct_score",
        "sort_key": 817.5,
        "tier": "risk",
        "top_label": "1-1",
        "top_prob": 12.5
      }
    ],
    "market_intelligence": {
      "betting_signal": {
        "alert_breadth": "7/9",
        "alert_breadth_note": "7/9 sportsbooks confirmed",
        "alert_move": "\u2191 +5.4%",
        "alert_team": "Aalborg BK",
        "alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
        "divergence_pp": 12.2,
        "has_alert": true,
        "hero_edge_pp": -12.24,
        "hero_label": "Aalborg BK",
        "market_prob_pct": 50.7,
        "market_team": "Aalborg BK",
        "model_prob_pct": 38.5,
        "model_team": "Aalborg BK",
        "show": true,
        "status_icon": "!",
        "status_key": "caution",
        "status_label": "Use caution",
        "status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
        "steam_score": 46,
        "steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
        "steam_tier": "B",
        "title": "Betting Signal"
      },
      "decision_chain": {
        "academy_links": [
          {
            "key": "market_disagree",
            "read_min": 5,
            "title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
            "url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "steam",
            "read_min": 4,
            "title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
            "url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "clv_pending",
            "read_min": 3,
            "title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
            "url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
          }
        ],
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": true,
          "direction_key": "agree",
          "gap_pp": 12.3,
          "key": "conflict",
          "label": "Disagree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 12.3,
          "summary": "The market has moved away from Aalborg BK, but the model still strongly favours Aalborg BK."
        },
        "authority": {
          "action": "no_bet",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": true,
            "direction_key": "agree",
            "gap_pp": 12.3,
            "key": "conflict",
            "label": "Disagree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 12.3,
            "summary": "The market has moved away from Aalborg BK, but the model still strongly favours Aalborg BK."
          },
          "alignment_key": "conflict",
          "best_consensus_ev": 0.0878,
          "best_outlier_ev": 0.2972,
          "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
          "decision_strength": 3.0,
          "decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
          "decision_strength_v2": 3.1,
          "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
          "execution_confidence": 20,
          "extreme_disagreement": false,
          "final_verdict_audit": {
            "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
            "action_label": "Action",
            "decision": "No Primary Bet",
            "is_primary": false,
            "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Aalborg BK at 38.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 50.7%.",
            "why": [
              {
                "text": "Decision Model identifies Aalborg BK as the value side (38.5%)",
                "tone": "ok"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
                "tone": "bad"
              }
            ],
            "why_label": "Decision Summary"
          },
          "gap_pp": 12.3,
          "gates_failed": [
            "Reliability below 65"
          ],
          "has_top_pick": true,
          "headline": "No Primary Bet",
          "hero_mode": "default",
          "icon": "\u25cb",
          "label": "No Primary Bet",
          "market_signal": "The market has moved away from Aalborg BK, but the model still strongly favours Aalborg BK.",
          "model_conflict_detail": null,
          "model_lean": "Aalborg BK",
          "no_primary_reasons": {
            "all_triggered": [
              "market_conflict",
              "market_quality",
              "calibration_risk"
            ],
            "calibration_mode": "soft",
            "codes": [
              "market_conflict",
              "market_quality"
            ],
            "label": "Reason",
            "other_factors": [
              {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              }
            ],
            "other_label": "Other factors",
            "primary": {
              "code": "market_conflict",
              "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
              "name": "Market Conflict",
              "short": "Market Conflict",
              "subtype": "drift_against_model",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "secondary": {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "version": "v1"
          },
          "outlier_detected": true,
          "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Aalborg BK \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.50 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +30% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1551341 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.50 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +8.8% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
          "primary_allowed": false,
          "primary_block_explain": {
            "entries": [
              {
                "key": "positive_ev",
                "label": "Consensus EV +8.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                "ok": true
              },
              {
                "key": "gate",
                "label": "Reliability below 65",
                "ok": false
              }
            ],
            "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
            "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
            "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
            "title": "Why not Primary?"
          },
          "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +8.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
          "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +8.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
          "primary_gates": {
            "items": [
              {
                "key": "extreme_gap",
                "label": "Extreme gap",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "no"
              },
              {
                "key": "xg_calibration",
                "label": "xG calibration",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "warning"
              },
              {
                "key": "reliability",
                "label": "Rel",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "58 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "execution",
                "label": "Exec",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "20 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "alignment",
                "label": "Align",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "conflict"
              },
              {
                "key": "consensus_ev",
                "label": "ConsEV",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "+8.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
              },
              {
                "key": "top_pick",
                "label": "Pick",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              },
              {
                "key": "validation",
                "label": "Validation",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              }
            ],
            "passed": 5,
            "total": 8
          },
          "primary_type": null,
          "reasons": [
            "The market has moved away from Aalborg BK, but the model still strongly favours Aalborg BK.",
            "Decision strength: 3.0/10",
            "Reliability below 65",
            "Outlier price +30% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
          ],
          "reliability_score": 58,
          "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
          "strength_v2_breakdown": [
            "Base decision score (v1)",
            "Market steam conflicts with model",
            "Consensus-line +EV",
            "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
          ],
          "subline": "The market has moved away from Aalborg BK, but the model still strongly favours Aalborg BK.",
          "thresholds": {
            "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
            "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
            "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
            "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
            "min_execution": 65,
            "min_reliability": 65,
            "min_strength": 7.0,
            "source": "db",
            "user_id": 2
          },
          "thresholds_source": "db",
          "thresholds_user_id": 2,
          "tier": "observe",
          "validation_ok": true,
          "value_context": {
            "consensus_ev": -0.1592,
            "consensus_ev_display": "-15.9%",
            "consensus_odds": 1.88,
            "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
            "disagreement_level": "moderate",
            "implied_prob": 0.5073,
            "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
            "model_prob": 0.3846,
            "raw_edge_display": "-12.3 percentage points",
            "raw_edge_pp": -12.3,
            "raw_implied_prob": 0.5319148936170213,
            "raw_signal_ev": -0.277,
            "raw_signal_ev_display": "-27.7%"
          },
          "version": "v2.5",
          "xg_calibration": {
            "block_value_alert": false,
            "calibration_status": "warning",
            "deviation_pct": 1.5,
            "reasons": [
              "Thin xG separation gap=0.14"
            ],
            "recommended_action": "monitor",
            "strength_delta": -1.0,
            "uplift_away": null,
            "uplift_home": null,
            "xg_separation": {
              "band": "low",
              "block_value_alert": false,
              "separation_score": -10,
              "strength_delta": -1.0,
              "xg_gap": 0.14
            }
          }
        },
        "bet_status": "no_bet",
        "books_breadth_display": "7/9",
        "breadth_ratio": 0.7777777777777778,
        "evidence": {
          "score": 57,
          "signals": [
            {
              "icon": "\u25cb",
              "key": "statistical_edge",
              "label": "No strong statistical edge",
              "status": "neutral"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "market_agreement",
              "label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
              "status": "caution"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
              "status": "caution"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation warning",
              "status": "caution"
            }
          ],
          "stars": 2,
          "tier": "moderate",
          "tier_label": "Moderate"
        },
        "forecast_reliability": {
          "breakdown": [
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation: Warning",
              "tone": "caution"
            },
            {
              "key": "gap",
              "label": "Large market gap (12 pp)",
              "tone": "caution"
            },
            {
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
              "tone": "caution"
            }
          ],
          "parts": {
            "alignment": 18.9,
            "data_quality": 12.0,
            "market_coverage": 7.8,
            "steam_coherence": 0.0,
            "validation": 14.0
          },
          "score": 58,
          "stars": 2,
          "tier": "moderate",
          "tier_label": "Moderate"
        },
        "lean_gap_pp": 12.24,
        "market_agreement": "weak",
        "max_gap_pp": 12.24,
        "model_calibration": {
          "away_xg": 1.23,
          "calibration_status": "ok",
          "deviation_pct": 1.0,
          "elevated": false,
          "home_xg": 1.37,
          "impact_note": "",
          "league_avg_xg": 1.35,
          "peak_xg": 1.37,
          "status_label": "Within typical league range",
          "summary": "Home xG 1.37 \u00b7 Away xG 1.23 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +1%",
          "title": "Model Calibration Check"
        },
        "move_is_drift": true,
        "mv_status": "warning",
        "odds_delta_pct": 5.4,
        "steam_conflicts": true,
        "steam_move_display": "\u2191 +5.4%",
        "steam_team": "Aalborg BK",
        "suppress_execution": false,
        "value_split": {
          "execution_confidence": {
            "label": "Monitoring Confidence",
            "score": 20,
            "tier": "not_reliable",
            "tier_label": "Not reliable"
          },
          "market_compatibility": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 13,
            "tier": "not_reliable",
            "tier_label": "Not reliable"
          },
          "model_edge_strength": {
            "label": "Model Signal Strength",
            "score": 38,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "model_value": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 13,
            "tier": "not_reliable",
            "tier_label": "Not reliable"
          },
          "recommendation": {
            "action": "no_bet",
            "label": "No Primary Bet"
          }
        },
        "verdict": {
          "agree_note": "The market has moved away from Aalborg BK, but the model still strongly favours Aalborg BK.",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": true,
            "direction_key": "agree",
            "gap_pp": 12.3,
            "key": "conflict",
            "label": "Disagree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 12.3,
            "summary": "The market has moved away from Aalborg BK, but the model still strongly favours Aalborg BK."
          },
          "authority": {
            "action": "no_bet",
            "alignment": {
              "direction_aligned": true,
              "direction_key": "agree",
              "gap_pp": 12.3,
              "key": "conflict",
              "label": "Disagree",
              "model_strong": false,
              "pricing_aligned": true,
              "pricing_key": "moderate",
              "probability_gap_pp": 12.3,
              "summary": "The market has moved away from Aalborg BK, but the model still strongly favours Aalborg BK."
            },
            "alignment_key": "conflict",
            "best_consensus_ev": 0.0878,
            "best_outlier_ev": 0.2972,
            "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
            "decision_strength": 3.0,
            "decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
            "decision_strength_v2": 3.1,
            "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
            "execution_confidence": 20,
            "extreme_disagreement": false,
            "final_verdict_audit": {
              "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
              "action_label": "Action",
              "decision": "No Primary Bet",
              "is_primary": false,
              "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Aalborg BK at 38.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 50.7%.",
              "why": [
                {
                  "text": "Decision Model identifies Aalborg BK as the value side (38.5%)",
                  "tone": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
                  "tone": "bad"
                }
              ],
              "why_label": "Decision Summary"
            },
            "gap_pp": 12.3,
            "gates_failed": [
              "Reliability below 65"
            ],
            "has_top_pick": true,
            "headline": "No Primary Bet",
            "hero_mode": "default",
            "icon": "\u25cb",
            "label": "No Primary Bet",
            "market_signal": "The market has moved away from Aalborg BK, but the model still strongly favours Aalborg BK.",
            "model_conflict_detail": null,
            "model_lean": "Aalborg BK",
            "no_primary_reasons": {
              "all_triggered": [
                "market_conflict",
                "market_quality",
                "calibration_risk"
              ],
              "calibration_mode": "soft",
              "codes": [
                "market_conflict",
                "market_quality"
              ],
              "label": "Reason",
              "other_factors": [
                {
                  "code": "market_quality",
                  "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                  "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                  "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                  "tone": "warn"
                }
              ],
              "other_label": "Other factors",
              "primary": {
                "code": "market_conflict",
                "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
                "name": "Market Conflict",
                "short": "Market Conflict",
                "subtype": "drift_against_model",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "secondary": {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "version": "v1"
            },
            "outlier_detected": true,
            "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Aalborg BK \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.50 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +30% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1551341 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.50 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +8.8% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
            "primary_allowed": false,
            "primary_block_explain": {
              "entries": [
                {
                  "key": "positive_ev",
                  "label": "Consensus EV +8.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                  "ok": true
                },
                {
                  "key": "gate",
                  "label": "Reliability below 65",
                  "ok": false
                }
              ],
              "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
              "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
              "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
              "title": "Why not Primary?"
            },
            "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +8.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
            "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +8.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
            "primary_gates": {
              "items": [
                {
                  "key": "extreme_gap",
                  "label": "Extreme gap",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "no"
                },
                {
                  "key": "xg_calibration",
                  "label": "xG calibration",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "warning"
                },
                {
                  "key": "reliability",
                  "label": "Rel",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "58 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "execution",
                  "label": "Exec",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "20 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "alignment",
                  "label": "Align",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "conflict"
                },
                {
                  "key": "consensus_ev",
                  "label": "ConsEV",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "+8.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "top_pick",
                  "label": "Pick",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                },
                {
                  "key": "validation",
                  "label": "Validation",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                }
              ],
              "passed": 5,
              "total": 8
            },
            "primary_type": null,
            "reasons": [
              "The market has moved away from Aalborg BK, but the model still strongly favours Aalborg BK.",
              "Decision strength: 3.0/10",
              "Reliability below 65",
              "Outlier price +30% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
            ],
            "reliability_score": 58,
            "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
            "strength_v2_breakdown": [
              "Base decision score (v1)",
              "Market steam conflicts with model",
              "Consensus-line +EV",
              "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
            ],
            "subline": "The market has moved away from Aalborg BK, but the model still strongly favours Aalborg BK.",
            "thresholds": {
              "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
              "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
              "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
              "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
              "min_execution": 65,
              "min_reliability": 65,
              "min_strength": 7.0,
              "source": "db",
              "user_id": 2
            },
            "thresholds_source": "db",
            "thresholds_user_id": 2,
            "tier": "observe",
            "validation_ok": true,
            "value_context": {
              "consensus_ev": -0.1592,
              "consensus_ev_display": "-15.9%",
              "consensus_odds": 1.88,
              "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
              "disagreement_level": "moderate",
              "implied_prob": 0.5073,
              "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
              "model_prob": 0.3846,
              "raw_edge_display": "-12.3 percentage points",
              "raw_edge_pp": -12.3,
              "raw_implied_prob": 0.5319148936170213,
              "raw_signal_ev": -0.277,
              "raw_signal_ev_display": "-27.7%"
            },
            "version": "v2.5",
            "xg_calibration": {
              "block_value_alert": false,
              "calibration_status": "warning",
              "deviation_pct": 1.5,
              "reasons": [
                "Thin xG separation gap=0.14"
              ],
              "recommended_action": "monitor",
              "strength_delta": -1.0,
              "uplift_away": null,
              "uplift_home": null,
              "xg_separation": {
                "band": "low",
                "block_value_alert": false,
                "separation_score": -10,
                "strength_delta": -1.0,
                "xg_gap": 0.14
              }
            }
          },
          "headline": "No Primary Bet",
          "icon": "\u25cb",
          "label": "No Primary Bet",
          "subline": "The market has moved away from Aalborg BK, but the model still strongly favours Aalborg BK.",
          "tier": "observe"
        },
        "why": {
          "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
          "bullets": [
            "Model: Aalborg BK 1.37 xG vs Vendsyssel FF 1.23 \u2192 Aalborg BK 38.5%",
            "Market: Aalborg BK ~50.7% implied",
            "Market Drift: Aalborg BK odds \u2191 +5.4%"
          ],
          "one_liner": "Model favours Aalborg BK, but the market has moved away from Aalborg BK.",
          "title": "Why?"
        }
      },
      "edge_rows": [
        {
          "edge_pp": -12.24,
          "fair_prob": 38.49,
          "label": "Aalborg BK",
          "market_prob": 50.73,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "home"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 3.79,
          "fair_prob": 29.57,
          "label": "Draw",
          "market_prob": 25.78,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "draw"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 8.45,
          "fair_prob": 31.94,
          "label": "Vendsyssel FF",
          "market_prob": 23.49,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "away"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -4.16,
          "fair_prob": 48.2,
          "label": "Over 2.5",
          "market_prob": 52.36,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "over"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 4.16,
          "fair_prob": 51.8,
          "label": "Under 2.5",
          "market_prob": 47.64,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "under"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -1.54,
          "fair_prob": 54.4,
          "label": "BTTS Yes",
          "market_prob": 55.94,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "yes"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 1.54,
          "fair_prob": 45.6,
          "label": "BTTS No",
          "market_prob": 44.06,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "no"
        }
      ],
      "edge_snapshot": {
        "edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
        "edge_pp": -12.24,
        "fair_prob_pct": 38.49,
        "hero_side": "home",
        "hero_team_name": "Aalborg BK",
        "market_prob_pct": 50.73,
        "status": "strong_market_ahead",
        "steam_team_name": "Aalborg BK"
      },
      "fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
      "fair_vs_market": {
        "closing_capture": "PRE1",
        "closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "comparison_available": true,
        "comparison_disabled": false,
        "comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Aalborg BK\u0027s win probability at 50.7%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 38.5%, a difference of 12.2 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
        "degraded_note": "",
        "divergence_guard": {
          "divergence_level": "strong",
          "edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
          "max_gap_pp": 12.24,
          "suppress_hero": false,
          "suppress_value_language": false
        },
        "divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
        "divergence_level": "strong",
        "divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
        "divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
        "divergence_tier": "strong",
        "edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
        "edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
        "fair_confidence": "medium",
        "fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
        "fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "forecast_assessment": {
          "favourite_class": "Balanced match",
          "favourite_label": "Aalborg BK",
          "forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
          "headline": "Balanced match",
          "market_agreement_label": "Weak",
          "market_direction": {
            "label": "Conflicts with model",
            "positive": false
          },
          "market_prob_pct": 50.7,
          "model_prob_gap_display": "-12.2 percentage points",
          "model_prob_gap_pp": -12.2,
          "model_prob_pct": 38.5,
          "outcome_separation_tier": "medium",
          "paragraphs": [],
          "pricing_convergence": {
            "gap_display": "-12.2 percentage points",
            "gap_pp": -12.2,
            "label": "Moderate",
            "label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
          },
          "reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
          "reliability_icon": "!",
          "reliability_score": 58,
          "reliability_tier": "limited",
          "summary": "The market has moved away from Aalborg BK, but the model still strongly favours Aalborg BK. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
          "tier": "balanced",
          "title": "Prediction Assessment",
          "validation_label": "Warning",
          "value_split": {
            "execution_confidence": {
              "label": "Monitoring Confidence",
              "score": 20,
              "tier": "not_reliable",
              "tier_label": "Not reliable"
            },
            "market_compatibility": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 13,
              "tier": "not_reliable",
              "tier_label": "Not reliable"
            },
            "model_edge_strength": {
              "label": "Model Signal Strength",
              "score": 38,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "model_value": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 13,
              "tier": "not_reliable",
              "tier_label": "Not reliable"
            },
            "recommendation": {
              "action": "no_bet",
              "label": "No Primary Bet"
            }
          },
          "why": {
            "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
            "bullets": [
              "Model: Aalborg BK 1.37 xG vs Vendsyssel FF 1.23 \u2192 Aalborg BK 38.5%",
              "Market: Aalborg BK ~50.7% implied",
              "Market Drift: Aalborg BK odds \u2191 +5.4%"
            ],
            "one_liner": "Model favours Aalborg BK, but the market has moved away from Aalborg BK.",
            "title": "Why?"
          }
        },
        "forecast_certainty": {
          "note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
          "tier": "low",
          "tier_label": "Low"
        },
        "forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
        "has_market_probs": true,
        "hero_edge_pp": -12.24,
        "hero_label": "Aalborg BK",
        "hero_side": "home",
        "market_activity": "Aalborg BK odds lengthened \u2191 +5.4%.",
        "market_agreement": "weak",
        "market_agreement_label": "Weak",
        "market_interpretation": {
          "bullets": [
            "Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.",
            "Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing."
          ],
          "follow_up": "",
          "gap_tier": "strong",
          "lead": "The market is materially more optimistic about Aalborg BK than the current fair estimate.",
          "note": "Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on Aalborg BK.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The market is materially more optimistic about Aalborg BK than the current fair estimate.",
            "Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on Aalborg BK."
          ],
          "quiet_market": false,
          "title": "Market Assessment"
        },
        "market_narrative": {
          "paragraphs": [
            "The market favors Aalborg BK more strongly than the current fair estimate.",
            "Recent line movement on Aalborg BK (\u2191 +5.4%) aligns with the pricing gap.",
            "Broad sportsbook alignment (7/9) supports the current market view on Aalborg BK."
          ],
          "title": "Current Market Narrative"
        },
        "market_source": "closing_1x2",
        "max_gap_pp": 12.24,
        "model_validation": {
          "score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
          "status": "warning"
        },
        "model_validation_label": "Warning",
        "outcome_separation": {
          "breakdown": [
            "No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
            "Favourite exceeds second outcome by 6.6 pp (at 38.5%)."
          ],
          "lead_gap_pp": 6.6,
          "max_prob_pct": 38.5,
          "note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
          "tier": "medium",
          "tier_label": "Medium"
        },
        "outcome_separation_label": "Medium",
        "overall_assessment": {
          "badge_class": "strong",
          "largest_gap_label": "Aalborg BK",
          "largest_gap_pp": -12.2,
          "lead": "The closing market prices Aalborg BK higher than the statistical model.",
          "level": "strong",
          "max_gap_pp": 12.2,
          "title": "Strong Disagreement"
        },
        "rows": [
          {
            "difference_pp": -12.24,
            "edge_pp": -12.24,
            "fair_prob_pct": 38.49,
            "is_hero": true,
            "label": "Aalborg BK",
            "market_prob_pct": 50.73,
            "side": "home",
            "signal_key": "market_higher",
            "signal_label": "Market Higher"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": 3.79,
            "edge_pp": 3.79,
            "fair_prob_pct": 29.57,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Draw",
            "market_prob_pct": 25.78,
            "side": "draw",
            "signal_key": "aligned",
            "signal_label": "Aligned"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": 8.45,
            "edge_pp": 8.45,
            "fair_prob_pct": 31.94,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Vendsyssel FF",
            "market_prob_pct": 23.49,
            "side": "away",
            "signal_key": "model_higher",
            "signal_label": "Model Higher"
          }
        ],
        "status": "strong_market_ahead",
        "status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
        "steam_note": "Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on Aalborg BK.",
        "unavailable_note": ""
      },
      "interpretation": {
        "has_conflict": true,
        "paragraphs": [
          "The betting market strongly prefers Aalborg BK (50.7%).",
          "Aalborg BK odds have drifted longer across books (\u2191 +5.4%, 7/9) \u2014 market pricing moves against this side.",
          "This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Aalborg BK, Market \u2192 Aalborg BK, while Aalborg BK odds drifted longer (market fade).",
          "Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
        ],
        "show": true,
        "title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
      },
      "lifecycle": {
        "closing_implied_pct": 53.19,
        "closing_odds": 1.88,
        "closing_reason": "",
        "closing_status": "recorded",
        "closing_status_label": "Recorded",
        "clv_pending": true,
        "clv_pp": 0.0,
        "clv_reason": "",
        "clv_status": "pending",
        "context": "match",
        "current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
        "current_stage_detail": "",
        "current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
        "entry_implied_pct": 53.19,
        "entry_odds": 1.88,
        "match_phase": "upcoming",
        "match_phase_detail": "",
        "match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
        "match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
        "model_validation_label": "Warning",
        "model_validation_status": "warning",
        "stages": [
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "forecast_generated",
            "label": "Prediction Generated",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "market_detected",
            "label": "Market Compared",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "model_validated",
            "label": "Validation Passed",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "PRE1",
            "id": "closing_recorded",
            "label": "Closing Recorded",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "clv_evaluated",
            "label": "CLV Evaluated",
            "status": "pending"
          }
        ]
      },
      "market_move_intelligence": {
        "books_reacting": 7,
        "books_reacting_detail": [
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 8,
            "bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +5.4%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 5.4
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 5,
            "bookmaker_name": "SBO",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +5.3%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 5.3
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 3,
            "bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +3.2%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 3.2
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 36,
            "bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.6%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 2.6
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 4,
            "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.6%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 2.6
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 7,
            "bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.1%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 2.1
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 32,
            "bookmaker_name": "Betano",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.0%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 2.0
          }
        ],
        "books_total": 9,
        "breadth_display": "7/9",
        "clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
        "clv_status": "evaluated",
        "current_odds": 1.95,
        "is_drift": true,
        "move_context": "Largest move today",
        "move_display": "\u2191 +5.4%",
        "move_pct_abs": 5.4,
        "move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
        "move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 122h 6m",
        "narrative_paragraphs": [
          "Bet365 led repricing on Aalborg BK (5.4%) \u2014 sharp book moved before wider follow-through.",
          "A meaningful move led by sharper sportsbooks, with moderate market confirmation."
        ],
        "narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
        "odds_delta_pct": 5.4,
        "odds_path": {
          "chart_y_labels": [
            "1.95",
            "1.90",
            "1.85"
          ],
          "display": "2.02 \u2192 1.85 \u2192 1.95",
          "move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
          "move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 122h 6m",
          "pick_team": "Aalborg BK",
          "points": [
            {
              "label_key": "open",
              "value": "2.02"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "extreme",
              "value": "1.85"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "current",
              "value": "1.95"
            }
          ],
          "sparkline_points": [
            1.85,
            1.88,
            1.95
          ],
          "sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 28.0,12.6 56.0,0.0",
          "sparkline_trend": "up",
          "sparkline_trend_label": "One-way rise",
          "summary_boxes": [
            {
              "label_key": "open",
              "value": "1.85"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "low",
              "value": "1.85"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "high",
              "value": "1.95"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "current",
              "value": "1.95"
            }
          ]
        },
        "open_odds": 1.85,
        "page_alert_line": "Broad drift across 7/9 sportsbooks on Aalborg BK",
        "phase_label": "Sharp repricing",
        "phase_tip": "Aggressive adjustment \u2014 often sharp-led or high consensus.",
        "pick_team": "Aalborg BK",
        "ref_book": "Bet365",
        "seo_title_alert": "",
        "sharp_leader": "Bet365",
        "show": true,
        "signal_badge_class": "confirm",
        "signal_icon": "\u26a1",
        "signal_impact": {
          "current_odds": 1.95,
          "is_drift": true,
          "label": "Market Signal",
          "move_display": "\u2191 +5.4%",
          "open_odds": 1.85,
          "summary": "Market moved away from Aalborg BK while the model still favours another side.",
          "team": "Aalborg BK",
          "tone": "against"
        },
        "signal_key": "sharp_led",
        "signal_label": "Sharp-led move",
        "steam_score": 46,
        "steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
        "steam_tier": "B",
        "title": "Market Move Intelligence"
      },
      "market_overview": {
        "breadth_display": "7/9",
        "current_odds": 1.95,
        "move_display": "\u2191 +5.4%",
        "open_odds": 1.85,
        "pick_team": "Aalborg BK",
        "steam_score": 46,
        "steam_team_name": "Aalborg BK",
        "steam_tier": "B"
      },
      "premium_teaser": {
        "current_divergence_pp": 12.2,
        "divergence_label": "Current divergence",
        "title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
        "unlock_items": [
          "Historical similar matches",
          "Closing odds analysis",
          "CLV tracking",
          "Sharp money signals",
          "Market efficiency rating",
          "Historical model vs market results"
        ],
        "unlock_label": "Unlock"
      },
      "show": true
    },
    "match": {
      "at2.away_team_slug": "vendsyssel-ff",
      "away_expected_goals": null,
      "away_goal_display": null,
      "away_team_display_name": "Vendsyssel FF",
      "away_team_id": 399,
      "away_team_logo": "/static/teams/399.webp",
      "away_team_name": "Vendsyssel FF",
      "away_team_public_id": "4b1fmNCkTIB3HG",
      "away_team_slug": "vendsyssel-ff",
      "country_code": "DK",
      "country_display_name": "Denmark",
      "country_flag": "/static/images/country/dk.svg",
      "country_id": 44,
      "country_name": "Denmark",
      "fixture_id": 1551341,
      "goals_away": null,
      "goals_home": null,
      "home_expected_goals": null,
      "home_goal_display": null,
      "home_team_country": "Denmark",
      "home_team_display_name": "Aalborg BK",
      "home_team_id": 402,
      "home_team_logo": "/static/teams/402.webp",
      "home_team_name": "Aalborg BK",
      "home_team_public_id": "5BOFsDkIx29SxD",
      "home_team_slug": "aalborg",
      "ht.home_team_slug": "aalborg",
      "league_country": "Denmark",
      "league_country_display": "Denmark",
      "league_display_name": "Divisyen 1 Denmark",
      "league_id": 120,
      "league_logo": "/static/leagues/120.webp",
      "league_name": "Divisyen 1 Denmark",
      "league_public_id": "3kN7zuBL0Kbxkp",
      "league_season": 2026,
      "match_date": "2026-09-20 12:00:00",
      "public_id": "4h07uttmEFIi8R",
      "score_fulltime_away": null,
      "score_fulltime_home": null,
      "score_penalty_away": null,
      "score_penalty_home": null,
      "status_long": "Not Started",
      "status_short": "NS",
      "venue_city": "Aalborg BK",
      "venue_name": "Aalborg BK Portland Park"
    },
    "match_decision": {
      "confidence": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
          "pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
          "pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
          "Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
          "At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
        ],
        "score": 6.0
      },
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
          "away": {
            "alpha": 0.1746,
            "best_odd": 4.06,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.0148,
            "ev": 0.0137,
            "implied_prob": 0.2349,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.2349,
              "draw": 0.2578,
              "home": 0.5073
            },
            "model_prob": 0.3195,
            "p_final": 0.2497
          },
          "draw": {
            "alpha": 0.2829,
            "best_odd": 3.7,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.0108,
            "ev": -0.0064,
            "implied_prob": 0.2578,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.2349,
              "draw": 0.2578,
              "home": 0.5073
            },
            "model_prob": 0.2959,
            "p_final": 0.2685
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "alpha": 0.4896,
            "best_odd": 1.88,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.0601,
            "ev": -0.1592,
            "implied_prob": 0.5073,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.2349,
              "draw": 0.2578,
              "home": 0.5073
            },
            "model_prob": 0.3846,
            "p_final": 0.4473
          }
        },
        "1x2_outlier": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
          "away": {
            "best_odd": 4.06,
            "edge": 0.0732,
            "ev": 0.2972,
            "implied_prob": 0.2463,
            "model_prob": 0.3195
          },
          "draw": {
            "best_odd": 3.7,
            "edge": 0.0256,
            "ev": 0.0947,
            "implied_prob": 0.2703,
            "model_prob": 0.2959
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "best_odd": 1.88,
            "edge": -0.1473,
            "ev": -0.2769,
            "implied_prob": 0.5319,
            "model_prob": 0.3846
          }
        },
        "btts": {
          "alpha_no": 0.2205,
          "alpha_yes": 0.2426,
          "best_no_odd": 2.2,
          "best_yes_odd": 1.67,
          "btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
          "edge_no": 0.0154,
          "edge_yes": -0.0154,
          "ev_available": true,
          "ev_no": 0.0032,
          "ev_no_risk_adj": -0.0687,
          "ev_yes": -0.0915,
          "ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0802,
          "implied_no": 0.4406,
          "implied_yes": 0.5594,
          "market_first": {
            "available": true,
            "mode": "market_first_btts",
            "n_bookmakers": 7,
            "no": {
              "alpha": 0.2205,
              "best_odd": 2.09,
              "edge": 0.0029,
              "ev": -0.0687,
              "implied_prob": 0.4427,
              "model_prob": 0.456,
              "p_final": 0.4456
            },
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "yes": {
              "alpha": 0.2426,
              "best_odd": 1.66,
              "edge": -0.0032,
              "ev": -0.0802,
              "implied_prob": 0.5573,
              "model_prob": 0.544,
              "p_final": 0.5541
            }
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 7,
          "p_final_no": 0.4456,
          "p_final_yes": 0.5541,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "reliability": "medium"
        },
        "ou25": {
          "alpha_over": 0.2228,
          "alpha_under": 0.2228,
          "best_over_odd": 1.88,
          "best_under_odd": 2.1,
          "consensus_over_odd": 1.8,
          "consensus_under_odd": 1.95,
          "edge_over": -0.0416,
          "edge_under": 0.0416,
          "ev_available": true,
          "ev_over": -0.0938,
          "ev_over_risk_adj": -0.0792,
          "ev_under": 0.0878,
          "ev_under_risk_adj": -0.0475,
          "implied_over": 0.5236,
          "implied_over_mf": 0.52,
          "implied_under": 0.4764,
          "implied_under_mf": 0.48,
          "market_first": {
            "available": true,
            "mode": "market_first_ou",
            "n_bookmakers": 8,
            "over": {
              "alpha": 0.2228,
              "best_odd": 1.8,
              "edge": -0.0085,
              "ev": -0.0792,
              "implied_prob": 0.52,
              "model_prob": 0.482,
              "p_final": 0.5115
            },
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "under": {
              "alpha": 0.2228,
              "best_odd": 1.95,
              "edge": 0.0085,
              "ev": -0.0475,
              "implied_prob": 0.48,
              "model_prob": 0.518,
              "p_final": 0.4885
            }
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 8,
          "ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
          "p_final_over": 0.5115,
          "p_final_under": 0.4885,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "reliability": "medium"
        }
      },
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "avoid",
        "code": "no_edge",
        "execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
        "insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
        "stake_mult": 0.0,
        "use_split_strip": true
      },
      "match_tier": "no_bet",
      "min_ev": 0.02,
      "total_xg": 2.6,
      "variance_flag": false
    },
    "unified_decision": {
      "actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
      "algorithm": {
        "enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
        "game_typing_module": true,
        "version": "2.5.0"
      },
      "balanced_alternative": null,
      "best_consensus_ev": 0.0878,
      "best_outlier_ev": 0.2972,
      "best_tracked_ev": 0.0878,
      "confidence": 5.0,
      "decision_confidence_v1": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
          "pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Primary line identified (+1.0)",
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)"
        ],
        "breakdown_v2": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "score": 3.0,
        "score_v1_legacy": 5.0,
        "score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.1,
        "strength_v2": true
      },
      "decision_strength_v2": {
        "breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "score": 3.0,
        "score_pre_penalty": 3.1
      },
      "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
      "execution": {
        "1x2_dominant": false,
        "1x2_open_contest": true,
        "grade": "A",
        "stake_factor": 1.0
      },
      "favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
        "active": false,
        "gap": null,
        "side": null
      },
      "final_action": "no_bet",
      "final_decision": {
        "action": "no_bet",
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": true,
          "direction_key": "agree",
          "gap_pp": 12.3,
          "key": "conflict",
          "label": "Disagree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 12.3,
          "summary": "The market has moved away from Aalborg BK, but the model still strongly favours Aalborg BK."
        },
        "alignment_key": "conflict",
        "best_consensus_ev": 0.0878,
        "best_outlier_ev": 0.2972,
        "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
        "decision_strength": 3.0,
        "decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
        "decision_strength_v2": 3.1,
        "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
        "execution_confidence": 20,
        "extreme_disagreement": false,
        "final_verdict_audit": {
          "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
          "action_label": "Action",
          "decision": "No Primary Bet",
          "is_primary": false,
          "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Aalborg BK at 38.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 50.7%.",
          "why": [
            {
              "text": "Decision Model identifies Aalborg BK as the value side (38.5%)",
              "tone": "ok"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
              "tone": "bad"
            }
          ],
          "why_label": "Decision Summary"
        },
        "gap_pp": 12.3,
        "gates_failed": [
          "Reliability below 65"
        ],
        "has_top_pick": true,
        "headline": "No Primary Bet",
        "hero_mode": "default",
        "icon": "\u25cb",
        "label": "No Primary Bet",
        "market_signal": "The market has moved away from Aalborg BK, but the model still strongly favours Aalborg BK.",
        "model_conflict_detail": null,
        "model_lean": "Aalborg BK",
        "no_primary_reasons": {
          "all_triggered": [
            "market_conflict",
            "market_quality",
            "calibration_risk"
          ],
          "calibration_mode": "soft",
          "codes": [
            "market_conflict",
            "market_quality"
          ],
          "label": "Reason",
          "other_factors": [
            {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            }
          ],
          "other_label": "Other factors",
          "primary": {
            "code": "market_conflict",
            "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
            "name": "Market Conflict",
            "short": "Market Conflict",
            "subtype": "drift_against_model",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "secondary": {
            "code": "market_quality",
            "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
            "name": "Market Quality Risk",
            "short": "Market Quality Risk",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "version": "v1"
        },
        "outlier_detected": true,
        "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Aalborg BK \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.50 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +30% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1551341 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.50 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +8.8% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
        "primary_allowed": false,
        "primary_block_explain": {
          "entries": [
            {
              "key": "positive_ev",
              "label": "Consensus EV +8.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
              "ok": true
            },
            {
              "key": "gate",
              "label": "Reliability below 65",
              "ok": false
            }
          ],
          "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
          "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
          "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
          "title": "Why not Primary?"
        },
        "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +8.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
        "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +8.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
        "primary_gates": {
          "items": [
            {
              "key": "extreme_gap",
              "label": "Extreme gap",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "no"
            },
            {
              "key": "xg_calibration",
              "label": "xG calibration",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "warning"
            },
            {
              "key": "reliability",
              "label": "Rel",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "58 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "execution",
              "label": "Exec",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "20 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "alignment",
              "label": "Align",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "conflict"
            },
            {
              "key": "consensus_ev",
              "label": "ConsEV",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "+8.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
            },
            {
              "key": "top_pick",
              "label": "Pick",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            },
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            }
          ],
          "passed": 5,
          "total": 8
        },
        "primary_type": null,
        "reasons": [
          "The market has moved away from Aalborg BK, but the model still strongly favours Aalborg BK.",
          "Decision strength: 3.0/10",
          "Reliability below 65",
          "Outlier price +30% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
        ],
        "reliability_score": 58,
        "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
        "strength_v2_breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "subline": "The market has moved away from Aalborg BK, but the model still strongly favours Aalborg BK.",
        "thresholds": {
          "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
          "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
          "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
          "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
          "min_execution": 65,
          "min_reliability": 65,
          "min_strength": 7.0,
          "source": "db",
          "user_id": 2
        },
        "thresholds_source": "db",
        "thresholds_user_id": 2,
        "tier": "observe",
        "validation_ok": true,
        "value_context": {
          "consensus_ev": -0.1592,
          "consensus_ev_display": "-15.9%",
          "consensus_odds": 1.88,
          "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
          "disagreement_level": "moderate",
          "implied_prob": 0.5073,
          "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
          "model_prob": 0.3846,
          "raw_edge_display": "-12.3 percentage points",
          "raw_edge_pp": -12.3,
          "raw_implied_prob": 0.5319148936170213,
          "raw_signal_ev": -0.277,
          "raw_signal_ev_display": "-27.7%"
        },
        "version": "v2.5",
        "xg_calibration": {
          "block_value_alert": false,
          "calibration_status": "warning",
          "deviation_pct": 1.5,
          "reasons": [
            "Thin xG separation gap=0.14"
          ],
          "recommended_action": "monitor",
          "strength_delta": -1.0,
          "uplift_away": null,
          "uplift_home": null,
          "xg_separation": {
            "band": "low",
            "block_value_alert": false,
            "separation_score": -10,
            "strength_delta": -1.0,
            "xg_gap": 0.14
          }
        }
      },
      "game_type": {
        "label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
        "scoring_type": "balanced",
        "signals": {
          "btts_yes_prob": 0.544,
          "draw_prob": 0.2959,
          "max_1x2_prob": 0.3846,
          "over_prob": 0.482,
          "total_xg": 2.6,
          "under_prob": 0.518,
          "xg_diff": 0.14
        },
        "type": "balanced",
        "typing_weights_enabled": true
      },
      "hero_display_pick": null,
      "hero_mode": "default",
      "longshot_picks": [],
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "consensus_odds": 1.88,
          "decision": "no_bet",
          "edge": -0.0601,
          "ev": -0.1592,
          "implied_prob": 0.5073,
          "max_ev_side": "away",
          "model_prob": 0.3846,
          "side": "home",
          "side_label": "Aalborg BK"
        },
        "btts": {
          "decision": "small_edge",
          "decision_layer": {
            "alpha": 0.2205,
            "available": true,
            "consensus_odds": 2.09,
            "edge": 0.0029,
            "market_prob": 0.4427,
            "mode": "market_first_btts",
            "model_prob": 0.456,
            "n_bookmakers": 7,
            "no": {
              "alpha": 0.2205,
              "best_odd": 2.09,
              "edge": 0.0029,
              "ev": -0.0687,
              "implied_prob": 0.4427,
              "model_prob": 0.456,
              "p_final": 0.4456
            },
            "p_final": 0.4456,
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "risk_adj_ev": -0.0687,
            "value_side": "no",
            "yes": {
              "alpha": 0.2426,
              "best_odd": 1.66,
              "edge": -0.0032,
              "ev": -0.0802,
              "implied_prob": 0.5573,
              "model_prob": 0.544,
              "p_final": 0.5541
            }
          },
          "edge": 0.0154,
          "ev": 0.0032,
          "implied_prob": 0.4406,
          "model_prob": 0.456,
          "side": "no",
          "value_side": "no"
        },
        "ou_2_5": {
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "decision_layer": {
            "alpha": 0.2228,
            "available": true,
            "consensus_odds": 1.95,
            "edge": 0.0085,
            "market_prob": 0.48,
            "mode": "market_first_ou",
            "model_prob": 0.518,
            "n_bookmakers": 8,
            "over": {
              "alpha": 0.2228,
              "best_odd": 1.8,
              "edge": -0.0085,
              "ev": -0.0792,
              "implied_prob": 0.52,
              "model_prob": 0.482,
              "p_final": 0.5115
            },
            "p_final": 0.4885,
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "risk_adj_ev": -0.0475,
            "under": {
              "alpha": 0.2228,
              "best_odd": 1.95,
              "edge": 0.0085,
              "ev": -0.0475,
              "implied_prob": 0.48,
              "model_prob": 0.518,
              "p_final": 0.4885
            },
            "value_side": "under"
          },
          "edge": 0.0416,
          "ev": 0.0878,
          "implied_prob": 0.4764,
          "model_prob": 0.518,
          "side": "under",
          "value_side": "under"
        }
      },
      "match_id": 1551341,
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "bet",
        "actionable": true,
        "clear_edge": true,
        "code": "clear_edge",
        "execution_line_key": null,
        "insight_line_key": null,
        "max_valid_ev": 0.0878,
        "min_ev": 0.02,
        "stake_mult": 1.0,
        "use_split_strip": false
      },
      "match_tier": "value_game",
      "no_clear_primary": false,
      "probabilities": {
        "away": 0.3195,
        "draw": 0.2959,
        "home": 0.3846
      },
      "reason_codes": [
        "no_ev_1x2"
      ],
      "secondary_pick": null,
      "secondary_picks": [],
      "show_betting_primary_label": false,
      "suppressed_primary": null,
      "teams": {
        "away": "Vendsyssel FF",
        "home": "Aalborg BK"
      },
      "top_pick": {
        "composite_score": 0.031836,
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "ev": 0.0878,
        "implied_prob": 0.4764,
        "market": "ou_2_5",
        "model_prob": 0.518,
        "not_dominant": false,
        "primary_strength": "clear",
        "risk_band": "strong",
        "risk_tier": "primary",
        "side": "under",
        "slot": "primary",
        "speculative_primary": false
      },
      "valid_markets_count": 1,
      "value_context_1x2": {
        "consensus_ev": -0.1592,
        "consensus_ev_display": "-15.9%",
        "consensus_odds": 1.88,
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "implied_prob": 0.5073,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "model_prob": 0.3846,
        "raw_edge_display": "-12.3 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": -12.3,
        "raw_implied_prob": 0.5319148936170213,
        "raw_signal_ev": -0.277,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "-27.7%"
      }
    }
  },
  "fixture_id": 1551341,
  "generated_at_utc": "2026-09-20T12:00:10.592329+00:00",
  "lang_id": "en"
}

Dapatkan Ramalan Premium untuk Aalborg BK & Vendsyssel FF!

Buka analisis mendalam, tip pertaruhan eksklusif, dan ramalan perlawanan dengan perkhidmatan langganan premium kami.

Langgan Sekarang
Kembali ke Statistik
Divisyen 1 Denmark Divisyen 1 Denmark — Kedudukan
# PASUKAN P M S K Mata
1 Hvidovre 9 6 3 0 21
2 Vejle 9 5 4 0 19
3 FC Fredericia 9 3 5 1 14
4 Aarhus Fremad 9 3 4 2 13
5 Aalborg BK 9 3 4 2 13
6 Hobro IK 9 4 1 4 13
7 Vendsyssel FF 9 2 4 3 10
8 AB Copenhagen 9 2 3 4 9
9 Hillerød 9 2 3 4 9
10 Kolding IF 9 1 5 3 8
11 HB Køge 9 1 4 4 7
12 Esbjerg 9 1 2 6 5
# PASUKAN P J B +/- Mata
1 Vejle 9 22 13 +9 19
2 Hvidovre 9 18 9 +9 21
3 Hillerød 9 13 14 -1 9
4 FC Fredericia 9 12 6 +6 14
5 Hobro IK 9 12 16 -4 13
6 AB Copenhagen 9 11 10 +1 9
7 Aalborg BK 9 11 11 0 13
8 HB Køge 9 11 17 -6 7
9 Aarhus Fremad 9 10 9 +1 13
10 Kolding IF 9 10 12 -2 8
11 Vendsyssel FF 9 10 14 -4 10
12 Esbjerg 9 10 19 -9 5