Statistik / Bola Sepak / China. Liga Satu China / Meizhou Kejia vs Nanjing City

Meizhou Kejia vs Nanjing City Statistics & Analysis

Sep 13, 2026 - 11:30
2 1.37
1 1.23
xG Accuracy: 79%
Laman pertaruhan premium stake: pengguna baharu boleh guna kod promo FHn2uDc1. Daftar sekarang

Pasaran yang dijejaki vs hasil sepenuh masa

Setiap baris membandingkan model pra-perlawanan lean dengan keputusan sepenuh masa.

  • Pasaran Ramalan Hasilnya Hasil
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 matlamat) ✖ tak betul
  • Kedua-dua Pasukan Menjaringkan Gol BTTS Tidak Ya ✖ tak betul
  • 1X2 Meizhou Kejia Meizhou Kejia ✔ Betul
  • Cerapan skor tepat 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 2-1 ✔ Betul

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 07, 2026 · 01:09 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-7427058

Closing Odds 2.49
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Meizhou Kejia win · Meizhou Kejia 2–1 Nanjing City
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Intelijen pasaran

Bacaan selepas pilihan utama: bagaimana suapan penutup berprioriti bergerak berbanding model.

Ringkasan pasaran

Pasaran kekal stabil menjelang sepakan. Tiada anjakan implied ketara antara PRE30 dan PRE1 pada snapshot berprioriti.

Walaupun pergerakan lewat kecil, model masih menilai Meizhou Kejia (1X2),Lukis (1X2),Bawah 2.5 gol jauh melebihi implied snapshot penutupan — bacaan statik "model vs harga", bukan kejaran steam.

Model masih melebihi implied penutupan pada Meizhou Kejia (1X2) kira-kira 3.2 mata peratus — isyarat salah harga paling jelas pada halaman ini.

Model vs implied penutup

Pasaran Model % Implied penutup % Jurang (pp)
Meizhou Kejia (1X2) 38.5 35.2 +3.2
Lukis (1X2) 29.6 27.5 +2.1
Nanjing City (1X2) 31.9 37.2 -5.3
Lebih 2.5 gol 48.2 50.7 -2.5
Bawah 2.5 gol 51.8 49.3 +2.5
Apa maksudnya

Secara ringkas: model kira-kira 38.5% pada Meizhou Kejia (1X2), manakala snapshot penutup menunjukkan kira-kira 35.2%. Bezanya — kira-kira 3.2 mata peratus — ialah jurang model-vs-pasaran terbesar yang ditonjolkan di halaman ini.

Ringkas: "implied penutup" ialah kebarangkalian terbit daripada odds akhir yang ditangkap (selepas de-vig ringkas). "Jurang (pp)" = peratus model tolak implied tersebut, dalam mata peratus (pp).

Pergerakan garisan menjelang sepakan mula

Satu buku prioriti setiap snapshot (bukan semua). Laluan tangkapan: PRE30 → PRE1 · Buku: Pinnacle

Dalam kurungan pada lajur: Penutup = snapshot pertama tersedia ikut PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Awal = pertama dalam PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 yang berbeza daripada Penutup.

Odds terperinci dilipat di bawah — pergerakan implied (de-vig) boleh diabaikan.

Lihat jadual penuh baris demi baris
Pasaran Awal (PRE30) Penutup (PRE1) Δ tersirat (pp)
Meizhou Kejia (1X2) 2.63 2.63 -0.0
Lukis (1X2) 3.38 3.37 +0.1
Nanjing City (1X2) 2.49 2.49 -0.0
Lebih 2.5 gol 1.86 1.88 -0.4
Bawah 2.5 gol 1.94 1.93 +0.4

Taklimat AI untuk perlawanan ini belum tersedia. Selepas naik taraf pelayan, jalankan semula “Batch generate odds” untuk menjana ringkasan.

View technical JSON
{
  "bundle_version": 1,
  "content_hash": "e05795b74df99acd086ae4d9c471105651c0641b6482afc4cc6a29bdc50374d8",
  "decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
  "facts": {
    "ai_fp": {
      "away_predicted_xg": 1.23,
      "away_win_prob": 0.3194,
      "away_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "bayes_applied": 0,
      "btts_no_prob": 0.456,
      "btts_yes_prob": 0.544,
      "dc_rho": -0.13,
      "draw_prob": 0.2957,
      "draw_prob_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_away": 3.13,
      "fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_draw": 3.38,
      "fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_home": 2.6,
      "fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
      "home_predicted_xg": 1.37,
      "home_win_prob": 0.3849,
      "home_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "over_25_prob": 0.482,
      "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
      "under_25_prob": 0.518
    },
    "api_prediction": {
      "advice": "Double chance : Meizhou Kejia or draw",
      "main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
      "percent_away": "10%",
      "percent_draw": "45%",
      "percent_home": "45%",
      "winner_name": "Meizhou Kejia"
    },
    "away_xg": 1.23,
    "betting_insight": {
      "bet_label": "Meizhou Kejia",
      "confidence": null,
      "main_pick_meta": {
        "confidence": "low",
        "display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
        "edge": 0.0321,
        "edge_gap": 0.0651,
        "market": "1X2",
        "market_prob": 0.3525,
        "model_prob": 0.3846,
        "pick_type": "no_strong",
        "probabilities": {
          "away": 32.0,
          "draw": 29.6,
          "home": 38.5
        },
        "reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
        "selection": null,
        "selection_name": null
      },
      "market_comparison": [
        {
          "affi_link": "",
          "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
          "odd": 2.63
        }
      ],
      "risk_color": null,
      "risk_key": null,
      "stacked_market": null,
      "value_bet": {
        "best_odds": 2.63,
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "display_market": "Meizhou Kejia Win",
        "is_value": false,
        "label": "Home",
        "market_fair_odds": 2.84,
        "market_odds": 2.63,
        "model_odds": 2.6,
        "overround": 7.9,
        "prob_edge": 0.4,
        "value_pct": 1.2,
        "value_rating": "no_value"
      }
    },
    "betting_markets": {
      "btts": {
        "away_clean_sheet": 4,
        "away_failed_to_score": 7,
        "away_played": 22,
        "away_score_rate": 70.8,
        "home_clean_sheet": 3,
        "home_failed_to_score": 7,
        "home_played": 22,
        "home_score_rate": 74.6,
        "no_prob": 45.6,
        "pick": "Yes",
        "pick_prob": 54.4,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": false,
        "yes_prob": 54.4
      },
      "correct_score": {
        "away_expected": 1.23,
        "home_expected": 1.37,
        "scores": [
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-1",
            "prob": 12.5
          },
          {
            "away": 0,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-0",
            "prob": 10.2
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 0,
            "label": "0-1",
            "prob": 9.1
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 2,
            "label": "2-1",
            "prob": 8.6
          },
          {
            "away": 2,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-2",
            "prob": 7.7
          }
        ],
        "source": "xG"
      },
      "double_chance": {
        "options": [
          {
            "key": "1X",
            "label": "Meizhou Kejia or Draw",
            "prob": 68.1
          },
          {
            "key": "12",
            "label": "Meizhou Kejia or Nanjing City",
            "prob": 70.4
          },
          {
            "key": "X2",
            "label": "Draw or Nanjing City",
            "prob": 61.5
          }
        ],
        "pick_key": "12",
        "pick_label": "Meizhou Kejia or Nanjing City",
        "pick_prob": 70.4
      },
      "match_winner": {
        "away_pct": 31.9,
        "draw_pct": 29.6,
        "home_pct": 38.5,
        "lean_key": "home",
        "lean_label": "Meizhou Kejia"
      },
      "over_under": {
        "api_hint": null,
        "avg_total": 2.6,
        "away_avg_scored": 0.9,
        "confidence": "low",
        "home_avg_scored": 1.0,
        "over_prob": 48.2,
        "pick": "Under 2.5",
        "pick_prob": 51.8,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": true,
        "total_expected": 2.6,
        "under_prob": 51.8
      },
      "prob_source": "poisson",
      "value_bet_enhanced": {
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "edge": 1.3,
        "implied_prob": 38.0,
        "is_value": false,
        "label": "Home",
        "market": "Meizhou Kejia Win",
        "model_prob": 38.5,
        "odds": 2.63
      }
    },
    "closing_line_bundle": {
      "away_team": "Nanjing City",
      "closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
        "away": 37.24,
        "draw": 27.51,
        "home": 35.25
      },
      "closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "closing_capture": "PRE1",
      "closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-13 11:29:18",
      "early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "early_capture": "PRE30",
      "early_fetched_at": "2026-09-13 11:03:01",
      "has_data": true,
      "home_team": "Meizhou Kejia",
      "largest_move_kind": "ou_o",
      "max_abs_move_pp": 0.4,
      "model_vs_closing": [
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 35.25,
          "gap_pp": 3.21,
          "kind": "1x2_h",
          "model_pct": 38.46
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 27.51,
          "gap_pp": 2.07,
          "kind": "1x2_d",
          "model_pct": 29.59
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 37.24,
          "gap_pp": -5.28,
          "kind": "1x2_a",
          "model_pct": 31.95
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 50.66,
          "gap_pp": -2.46,
          "kind": "ou_o",
          "model_pct": 48.2
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 49.34,
          "gap_pp": 2.46,
          "kind": "ou_u",
          "model_pct": 51.8
        }
      ],
      "movement": [
        {
          "closing": 2.63,
          "early": 2.63,
          "implied_closing_pct": 35.25,
          "implied_delta_pp": -0.03,
          "implied_early_pct": 35.28,
          "kind": "1x2_h"
        },
        {
          "closing": 3.37,
          "early": 3.38,
          "implied_closing_pct": 27.51,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.06,
          "implied_early_pct": 27.45,
          "kind": "1x2_d"
        },
        {
          "closing": 2.49,
          "early": 2.49,
          "implied_closing_pct": 37.24,
          "implied_delta_pp": -0.03,
          "implied_early_pct": 37.27,
          "kind": "1x2_a"
        },
        {
          "closing": 1.88,
          "early": 1.86,
          "implied_closing_pct": 50.66,
          "implied_delta_pp": -0.4,
          "implied_early_pct": 51.05,
          "kind": "ou_o"
        },
        {
          "closing": 1.93,
          "early": 1.94,
          "implied_closing_pct": 49.34,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.4,
          "implied_early_pct": 48.95,
          "kind": "ou_u"
        }
      ],
      "movement_negligible": true,
      "same_bookmaker": true,
      "top_value_gap": {
        "gap_pp": 3.2,
        "kind": "1x2_h"
      }
    },
    "correct_score_insight": {
      "best_value": null,
      "lean_card": {
        "diff_pp": -2.9,
        "ev": -0.1875,
        "has_edge": false,
        "label": "1-1",
        "market_odds": 6.5,
        "market_prob": 0.1538,
        "market_prob_pct": 15.4,
        "model_prob": 0.125,
        "model_prob_pct": 12.5,
        "n_bookmakers": 7,
        "status_key": "no_value"
      },
      "most_likely": {
        "label": "1-1",
        "prob": 12.5
      },
      "top5": [
        {
          "label": "1-1",
          "prob": 12.5
        },
        {
          "label": "1-0",
          "prob": 10.2
        },
        {
          "label": "0-1",
          "prob": 9.1
        },
        {
          "label": "2-1",
          "prob": 8.6
        },
        {
          "label": "1-2",
          "prob": 7.7
        }
      ]
    },
    "home_xg": 1.37,
    "homepage_pick": null,
    "market_cards": [
      {
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "decision_layer": {
          "alpha": 0.2241,
          "available": true,
          "consensus_odds": 1.91,
          "edge": 0.0077,
          "edge_pp": 0.8,
          "market_prob": 0.4838,
          "mode": "market_first_ou",
          "model_prob": 0.518,
          "n_bookmakers": 8,
          "over": {
            "alpha": 0.2465,
            "best_odd": 1.79,
            "edge": -0.0084,
            "ev": -0.0911,
            "implied_prob": 0.5162,
            "model_prob": 0.482,
            "p_final": 0.5078
          },
          "p_final": 0.4915,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "raw_edge_pp": 3.4,
          "raw_signal_ev": -0.0106,
          "risk_adj_ev": -0.0613,
          "under": {
            "alpha": 0.2241,
            "best_odd": 1.91,
            "edge": 0.0077,
            "ev": -0.0613,
            "implied_prob": 0.4838,
            "model_prob": 0.518,
            "p_final": 0.4915
          },
          "value_side": "under"
        },
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_over": -0.1035,
        "ev_over_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -10.3,
          "text": "-10.3%"
        },
        "ev_under": 0.036,
        "ev_under_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 3.6,
          "text": "+3.6%"
        },
        "featured": true,
        "id": "ou_2_5",
        "max_ev": 0.036,
        "n_bookmakers": 8,
        "over_prob": 48.2,
        "sort_key": 10032.4,
        "tier": "best",
        "under_prob": 51.8,
        "value_side": "under"
      },
      {
        "decision": "small_edge",
        "decision_layer": {
          "alpha": 0.2181,
          "available": true,
          "consensus_odds": 2.1,
          "edge": 0.0045,
          "edge_pp": 0.5,
          "market_prob": 0.4355,
          "mode": "market_first_btts",
          "model_prob": 0.456,
          "n_bookmakers": 7,
          "no": {
            "alpha": 0.2181,
            "best_odd": 2.1,
            "edge": 0.0045,
            "ev": -0.0761,
            "implied_prob": 0.4355,
            "model_prob": 0.456,
            "p_final": 0.44
          },
          "p_final": 0.44,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "raw_edge_pp": 2.1,
          "raw_signal_ev": -0.0424,
          "risk_adj_ev": -0.0761,
          "value_side": "no",
          "yes": {
            "alpha": 0.2399,
            "best_odd": 1.62,
            "edge": -0.0049,
            "ev": -0.0935,
            "implied_prob": 0.5645,
            "model_prob": 0.544,
            "p_final": 0.5596
          }
        },
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_no": 0.0032,
        "ev_no_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 0.3,
          "text": "+0.3%"
        },
        "ev_yes": -0.0915,
        "ev_yes_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -9.2,
          "text": "-9.2%"
        },
        "featured": false,
        "id": "btts",
        "max_ev": 0.0032,
        "n_bookmakers": 7,
        "no_prob": 45.6,
        "sort_key": 5202.56,
        "tier": "lean",
        "value_side": "no",
        "yes_prob": 54.4
      },
      {
        "authority_action": "no_bet",
        "authority_note": "The market has repriced Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Meizhou Kejia.",
        "consensus_odds": 2.63,
        "decision": "no_bet",
        "disagreement_label": "Normal",
        "disagreement_level": "normal",
        "ev": -0.0367,
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -3.7,
          "text": "-3.7%"
        },
        "featured": false,
        "id": "1x2",
        "implied_prob": 0.3525,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "max_ev": -0.0367,
        "max_ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -3.7,
          "text": "-3.7%"
        },
        "model_prob": 0.3846,
        "raw_edge_display": "+3.2 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 3.2,
        "raw_signal_ev": 0.0115,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+1.1%",
        "show_primary_label": false,
        "side_label": "Meizhou Kejia",
        "sort_key": 1790.825,
        "tier": "bad_ev"
      },
      {
        "featured": false,
        "id": "correct_score",
        "sort_key": 817.5,
        "tier": "risk",
        "top_label": "1-1",
        "top_prob": 12.5
      }
    ],
    "market_intelligence": {
      "betting_signal": {
        "alert_breadth": "",
        "alert_breadth_note": "",
        "alert_move": "",
        "alert_team": "",
        "alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
        "divergence_pp": 5.3,
        "has_alert": false,
        "hero_edge_pp": -5.3,
        "hero_label": "Nanjing City",
        "market_prob_pct": 35.2,
        "market_team": "Nanjing City",
        "model_prob_pct": 38.5,
        "model_team": "Meizhou Kejia",
        "show": true,
        "status_icon": "\u2713",
        "status_key": "aligned",
        "status_label": "Reliable prediction",
        "status_line": "Direction aligned; check pricing gap separately",
        "steam_score": null,
        "steam_subtitle": "",
        "steam_tier": "",
        "title": "Betting Signal"
      },
      "decision_chain": {
        "academy_links": [
          {
            "key": "steam",
            "read_min": 4,
            "title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
            "url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "clv_pending",
            "read_min": 3,
            "title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
            "url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
          }
        ],
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": false,
          "direction_key": "conflict",
          "gap_pp": 5.3,
          "key": "conflict",
          "label": "Disagree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 5.3,
          "summary": "The market has repriced Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Meizhou Kejia."
        },
        "authority": {
          "action": "no_bet",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": false,
            "direction_key": "conflict",
            "gap_pp": 5.3,
            "key": "conflict",
            "label": "Disagree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 5.3,
            "summary": "The market has repriced Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Meizhou Kejia."
          },
          "alignment_key": "conflict",
          "best_consensus_ev": 0.036,
          "best_outlier_ev": 0.036,
          "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
          "decision_strength": 3.0,
          "decision_strength_v1": 4.0,
          "decision_strength_v2": 3.2,
          "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
          "execution_confidence": 37,
          "extreme_disagreement": false,
          "final_verdict_audit": {
            "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
            "action_label": "Action",
            "decision": "No Primary Bet",
            "is_primary": false,
            "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Meizhou Kejia at 38.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 35.2%.",
            "why": [
              {
                "text": "Decision Model identifies Meizhou Kejia as the value side (38.5%)",
                "tone": "ok"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Edge does not clear Primary threshold",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
                "tone": "bad"
              }
            ],
            "why_label": "Decision Summary"
          },
          "gap_pp": 3.2,
          "gates_failed": [
            "Execution confidence below 65"
          ],
          "has_top_pick": false,
          "headline": "No Primary Bet",
          "hero_mode": "default",
          "icon": "\u25cb",
          "label": "No Primary Bet",
          "market_signal": "The market has repriced Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Meizhou Kejia.",
          "model_conflict_detail": null,
          "model_lean": "Meizhou Kejia",
          "no_primary_reasons": {
            "all_triggered": [
              "market_conflict",
              "market_quality",
              "edge_low",
              "calibration_risk"
            ],
            "calibration_mode": "soft",
            "codes": [
              "market_conflict",
              "market_quality"
            ],
            "label": "Reason",
            "other_factors": [
              {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              }
            ],
            "other_label": "Other factors",
            "primary": {
              "code": "market_conflict",
              "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
              "name": "Market Conflict",
              "short": "Market Conflict",
              "subtype": "probability_gap",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "secondary": {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "version": "v1"
          },
          "outlier_detected": false,
          "outlier_excluded_panel": "",
          "primary_allowed": false,
          "primary_block_explain": {
            "entries": [
              {
                "key": "weak_ev",
                "label": "Consensus EV +3.6% \u003c Primary gate +5.0% (Lean gate +2.0% is separate \u2014 not Primary)",
                "ok": false
              },
              {
                "key": "gate",
                "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
                "ok": false
              }
            ],
            "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
            "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
            "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
            "title": "Why not Primary?"
          },
          "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +3.6% \u274c (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
          "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +3.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
          "primary_gates": {
            "items": [
              {
                "key": "extreme_gap",
                "label": "Extreme gap",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "no"
              },
              {
                "key": "xg_calibration",
                "label": "xG calibration",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "warning"
              },
              {
                "key": "reliability",
                "label": "Rel",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "84 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "execution",
                "label": "Exec",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "37 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "alignment",
                "label": "Align",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "conflict"
              },
              {
                "key": "consensus_ev",
                "label": "ConsEV",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "+3.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
              },
              {
                "key": "top_pick",
                "label": "Pick",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "false"
              },
              {
                "key": "validation",
                "label": "Validation",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              }
            ],
            "passed": 4,
            "total": 8
          },
          "primary_type": null,
          "reasons": [
            "The market has repriced Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Meizhou Kejia.",
            "Decision strength: 3.0/10",
            "Execution confidence below 65"
          ],
          "reliability_score": 84,
          "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
          "strength_v2_breakdown": [
            "Base decision score (v1)",
            "Reliability supports action",
            "Market steam conflicts with model",
            "Thin consensus value",
            "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
          ],
          "subline": "The market has repriced Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Meizhou Kejia.",
          "thresholds": {
            "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
            "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
            "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
            "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
            "min_execution": 65,
            "min_reliability": 65,
            "min_strength": 7.0,
            "source": "db",
            "user_id": 2
          },
          "thresholds_source": "db",
          "thresholds_user_id": 2,
          "tier": "observe",
          "validation_ok": true,
          "value_context": {
            "consensus_ev": -0.0367,
            "consensus_ev_display": "-3.7%",
            "consensus_odds": 2.63,
            "disagreement_label": "Normal",
            "disagreement_level": "normal",
            "implied_prob": 0.3525,
            "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
            "model_prob": 0.3846,
            "raw_edge_display": "+3.2 percentage points",
            "raw_edge_pp": 3.2,
            "raw_implied_prob": 0.3802281368821293,
            "raw_signal_ev": 0.0115,
            "raw_signal_ev_display": "+1.1%"
          },
          "version": "v2.5",
          "xg_calibration": {
            "block_value_alert": false,
            "calibration_status": "warning",
            "deviation_pct": 1.5,
            "reasons": [
              "Thin xG separation gap=0.14"
            ],
            "recommended_action": "monitor",
            "strength_delta": -1.0,
            "uplift_away": null,
            "uplift_home": null,
            "xg_separation": {
              "band": "low",
              "block_value_alert": false,
              "separation_score": -10,
              "strength_delta": -1.0,
              "xg_gap": 0.14
            }
          }
        },
        "bet_status": "no_bet",
        "books_breadth_display": "9/9",
        "breadth_ratio": 1.0,
        "evidence": {
          "score": 75,
          "signals": [
            {
              "icon": "\u25cb",
              "key": "statistical_edge",
              "label": "No strong statistical edge",
              "status": "neutral"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "market_agreement",
              "label": "Recent market move conflicts with the model favourite",
              "status": "caution"
            },
            {
              "icon": "\u25cb",
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Sharp steam detected",
              "status": "neutral"
            },
            {
              "icon": "\u2713",
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation passed",
              "status": "pass"
            }
          ],
          "stars": 4,
          "tier": "high",
          "tier_label": "High"
        },
        "forecast_reliability": {
          "breakdown": [
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation: Pass",
              "tone": "ok"
            }
          ],
          "parts": {
            "alignment": 22.4,
            "data_quality": 12.0,
            "market_coverage": 10.0,
            "steam_coherence": 5.0,
            "validation": 30.0
          },
          "score": 84,
          "stars": 4,
          "tier": "high",
          "tier_label": "High"
        },
        "lean_gap_pp": 5.3,
        "market_agreement": "strong",
        "max_gap_pp": 5.3,
        "model_calibration": {
          "away_xg": 1.23,
          "calibration_status": "ok",
          "deviation_pct": 1.0,
          "elevated": false,
          "home_xg": 1.37,
          "impact_note": "",
          "league_avg_xg": 1.35,
          "peak_xg": 1.37,
          "status_label": "Within typical league range",
          "summary": "Home xG 1.37 \u00b7 Away xG 1.23 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +1%",
          "title": "Model Calibration Check"
        },
        "move_is_drift": false,
        "mv_status": "pass",
        "odds_delta_pct": 0.0,
        "steam_conflicts": null,
        "steam_move_display": "+0.0%",
        "steam_team": "Meizhou Kejia",
        "suppress_execution": false,
        "value_split": {
          "execution_confidence": {
            "label": "Monitoring Confidence",
            "score": 37,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "market_compatibility": {
            "label": "Market Compatibility",
            "note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
            "score": 29,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "model_edge_strength": {
            "label": "Model Signal Strength",
            "score": 38,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "model_value": {
            "label": "Market Compatibility",
            "note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
            "score": 29,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "recommendation": {
            "action": "no_bet",
            "label": "No Primary Bet"
          }
        },
        "verdict": {
          "agree_note": "The market has repriced Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Meizhou Kejia.",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": false,
            "direction_key": "conflict",
            "gap_pp": 5.3,
            "key": "conflict",
            "label": "Disagree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 5.3,
            "summary": "The market has repriced Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Meizhou Kejia."
          },
          "authority": {
            "action": "no_bet",
            "alignment": {
              "direction_aligned": false,
              "direction_key": "conflict",
              "gap_pp": 5.3,
              "key": "conflict",
              "label": "Disagree",
              "model_strong": false,
              "pricing_aligned": true,
              "pricing_key": "moderate",
              "probability_gap_pp": 5.3,
              "summary": "The market has repriced Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Meizhou Kejia."
            },
            "alignment_key": "conflict",
            "best_consensus_ev": 0.036,
            "best_outlier_ev": 0.036,
            "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
            "decision_strength": 3.0,
            "decision_strength_v1": 4.0,
            "decision_strength_v2": 3.2,
            "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
            "execution_confidence": 37,
            "extreme_disagreement": false,
            "final_verdict_audit": {
              "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
              "action_label": "Action",
              "decision": "No Primary Bet",
              "is_primary": false,
              "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Meizhou Kejia at 38.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 35.2%.",
              "why": [
                {
                  "text": "Decision Model identifies Meizhou Kejia as the value side (38.5%)",
                  "tone": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Edge does not clear Primary threshold",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
                  "tone": "bad"
                }
              ],
              "why_label": "Decision Summary"
            },
            "gap_pp": 3.2,
            "gates_failed": [
              "Execution confidence below 65"
            ],
            "has_top_pick": false,
            "headline": "No Primary Bet",
            "hero_mode": "default",
            "icon": "\u25cb",
            "label": "No Primary Bet",
            "market_signal": "The market has repriced Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Meizhou Kejia.",
            "model_conflict_detail": null,
            "model_lean": "Meizhou Kejia",
            "no_primary_reasons": {
              "all_triggered": [
                "market_conflict",
                "market_quality",
                "edge_low",
                "calibration_risk"
              ],
              "calibration_mode": "soft",
              "codes": [
                "market_conflict",
                "market_quality"
              ],
              "label": "Reason",
              "other_factors": [
                {
                  "code": "market_quality",
                  "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                  "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                  "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                  "tone": "warn"
                }
              ],
              "other_label": "Other factors",
              "primary": {
                "code": "market_conflict",
                "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
                "name": "Market Conflict",
                "short": "Market Conflict",
                "subtype": "probability_gap",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "secondary": {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "version": "v1"
            },
            "outlier_detected": false,
            "outlier_excluded_panel": "",
            "primary_allowed": false,
            "primary_block_explain": {
              "entries": [
                {
                  "key": "weak_ev",
                  "label": "Consensus EV +3.6% \u003c Primary gate +5.0% (Lean gate +2.0% is separate \u2014 not Primary)",
                  "ok": false
                },
                {
                  "key": "gate",
                  "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
                  "ok": false
                }
              ],
              "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
              "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
              "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
              "title": "Why not Primary?"
            },
            "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +3.6% \u274c (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
            "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +3.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
            "primary_gates": {
              "items": [
                {
                  "key": "extreme_gap",
                  "label": "Extreme gap",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "no"
                },
                {
                  "key": "xg_calibration",
                  "label": "xG calibration",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "warning"
                },
                {
                  "key": "reliability",
                  "label": "Rel",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "84 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "execution",
                  "label": "Exec",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "37 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "alignment",
                  "label": "Align",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "conflict"
                },
                {
                  "key": "consensus_ev",
                  "label": "ConsEV",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "+3.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "top_pick",
                  "label": "Pick",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "false"
                },
                {
                  "key": "validation",
                  "label": "Validation",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                }
              ],
              "passed": 4,
              "total": 8
            },
            "primary_type": null,
            "reasons": [
              "The market has repriced Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Meizhou Kejia.",
              "Decision strength: 3.0/10",
              "Execution confidence below 65"
            ],
            "reliability_score": 84,
            "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
            "strength_v2_breakdown": [
              "Base decision score (v1)",
              "Reliability supports action",
              "Market steam conflicts with model",
              "Thin consensus value",
              "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
            ],
            "subline": "The market has repriced Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Meizhou Kejia.",
            "thresholds": {
              "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
              "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
              "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
              "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
              "min_execution": 65,
              "min_reliability": 65,
              "min_strength": 7.0,
              "source": "db",
              "user_id": 2
            },
            "thresholds_source": "db",
            "thresholds_user_id": 2,
            "tier": "observe",
            "validation_ok": true,
            "value_context": {
              "consensus_ev": -0.0367,
              "consensus_ev_display": "-3.7%",
              "consensus_odds": 2.63,
              "disagreement_label": "Normal",
              "disagreement_level": "normal",
              "implied_prob": 0.3525,
              "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
              "model_prob": 0.3846,
              "raw_edge_display": "+3.2 percentage points",
              "raw_edge_pp": 3.2,
              "raw_implied_prob": 0.3802281368821293,
              "raw_signal_ev": 0.0115,
              "raw_signal_ev_display": "+1.1%"
            },
            "version": "v2.5",
            "xg_calibration": {
              "block_value_alert": false,
              "calibration_status": "warning",
              "deviation_pct": 1.5,
              "reasons": [
                "Thin xG separation gap=0.14"
              ],
              "recommended_action": "monitor",
              "strength_delta": -1.0,
              "uplift_away": null,
              "uplift_home": null,
              "xg_separation": {
                "band": "low",
                "block_value_alert": false,
                "separation_score": -10,
                "strength_delta": -1.0,
                "xg_gap": 0.14
              }
            }
          },
          "headline": "No Primary Bet",
          "icon": "\u25cb",
          "label": "No Primary Bet",
          "subline": "The market has repriced Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Meizhou Kejia.",
          "tier": "observe"
        },
        "why": {
          "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
          "bullets": [
            "Model: Meizhou Kejia 1.37 xG vs Nanjing City 1.23 \u2192 Meizhou Kejia 38.5%",
            "Market: Nanjing City ~35.2% implied",
            "Market Steam: Meizhou Kejia +0.0%"
          ],
          "one_liner": "Model and market both lean Meizhou Kejia with no major conflict.",
          "title": "Why?"
        }
      },
      "edge_rows": [
        {
          "edge_pp": 3.24,
          "fair_prob": 38.49,
          "label": "Meizhou Kejia",
          "market_prob": 35.25,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "home"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 2.06,
          "fair_prob": 29.57,
          "label": "Draw",
          "market_prob": 27.51,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "draw"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -5.3,
          "fair_prob": 31.94,
          "label": "Nanjing City",
          "market_prob": 37.24,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "away"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -3.51,
          "fair_prob": 48.2,
          "label": "Over 2.5",
          "market_prob": 51.71,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "over"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 3.51,
          "fair_prob": 51.8,
          "label": "Under 2.5",
          "market_prob": 48.29,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "under"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -2.12,
          "fair_prob": 54.4,
          "label": "BTTS Yes",
          "market_prob": 56.52,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "yes"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 2.12,
          "fair_prob": 45.6,
          "label": "BTTS No",
          "market_prob": 43.48,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "no"
        }
      ],
      "edge_snapshot": {
        "edge_label": "mild_disagreement",
        "edge_pp": -5.3,
        "fair_prob_pct": 31.94,
        "hero_side": "away",
        "hero_team_name": "Nanjing City",
        "market_prob_pct": 37.24,
        "status": "market_ahead",
        "steam_team_name": "Meizhou Kejia"
      },
      "fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
      "fair_vs_market": {
        "closing_capture": "PRE1",
        "closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "comparison_available": true,
        "comparison_disabled": false,
        "comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Nanjing City\u0027s win probability at 37.2%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 31.9%, a difference of 5.3 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
        "degraded_note": "",
        "divergence_guard": {
          "divergence_level": "moderate",
          "edge_status": "market_ahead",
          "max_gap_pp": 5.3,
          "suppress_hero": false,
          "suppress_value_language": false
        },
        "divergence_label": "Moderate model-market divergence",
        "divergence_level": "moderate",
        "divergence_level_label": "Moderate divergence",
        "divergence_note": "Fair estimate and market pricing differ modestly. Monitor before kickoff.",
        "divergence_tier": "moderate",
        "edge_label": "Mild disagreement",
        "edge_label_key": "mild_disagreement",
        "fair_confidence": "medium",
        "fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
        "fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "forecast_assessment": {
          "favourite_class": "Balanced match",
          "favourite_label": "Meizhou Kejia",
          "forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
          "headline": "Balanced match",
          "market_agreement_label": "Strong",
          "market_direction": {
            "label": "Conflicts with model",
            "positive": false
          },
          "market_prob_pct": 35.2,
          "model_prob_gap_display": "+3.3 percentage points",
          "model_prob_gap_pp": 3.3,
          "model_prob_pct": 38.5,
          "outcome_separation_tier": "medium",
          "paragraphs": [],
          "pricing_convergence": {
            "gap_display": "+3.3 percentage points",
            "gap_pp": 3.3,
            "label": "High",
            "label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_high"
          },
          "reliability_headline": "High reliability",
          "reliability_icon": "\u2713",
          "reliability_score": 84,
          "reliability_tier": "high",
          "summary": "The market has repriced Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Meizhou Kejia. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
          "tier": "balanced",
          "title": "Prediction Assessment",
          "validation_label": "Pass",
          "value_split": {
            "execution_confidence": {
              "label": "Monitoring Confidence",
              "score": 37,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "market_compatibility": {
              "label": "Market Compatibility",
              "note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
              "score": 29,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "model_edge_strength": {
              "label": "Model Signal Strength",
              "score": 38,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "model_value": {
              "label": "Market Compatibility",
              "note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
              "score": 29,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "recommendation": {
              "action": "no_bet",
              "label": "No Primary Bet"
            }
          },
          "why": {
            "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
            "bullets": [
              "Model: Meizhou Kejia 1.37 xG vs Nanjing City 1.23 \u2192 Meizhou Kejia 38.5%",
              "Market: Nanjing City ~35.2% implied",
              "Market Steam: Meizhou Kejia +0.0%"
            ],
            "one_liner": "Model and market both lean Meizhou Kejia with no major conflict.",
            "title": "Why?"
          }
        },
        "forecast_certainty": {
          "note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
          "tier": "low",
          "tier_label": "Low"
        },
        "forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
        "has_market_probs": true,
        "hero_edge_pp": -5.3,
        "hero_label": "Nanjing City",
        "hero_side": "away",
        "market_activity": "No meaningful directional movement yet.",
        "market_agreement": "strong",
        "market_agreement_label": "Strong",
        "market_interpretation": {
          "bullets": [
            "Monitor line movement before kickoff \u2014 not a betting recommendation."
          ],
          "follow_up": "However, Meizhou Kejia has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 0.0%, suggesting weakening support.",
          "gap_tier": "mild",
          "lead": "The market and model broadly agree on Nanjing City. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.",
          "note": "Market activity is currently concentrated on Meizhou Kejia.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The market and model broadly agree on Nanjing City. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.",
            "However, Meizhou Kejia has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 0.0%, suggesting weakening support.",
            "Market activity is currently concentrated on Meizhou Kejia."
          ],
          "quiet_market": false,
          "title": "Market Assessment"
        },
        "market_narrative": {
          "paragraphs": [
            "The market still prices Nanjing City above the current fair estimate.",
            "At the same time, Meizhou Kejia has drifted \u2014 odds lengthened by 0.0%, suggesting weakening support.",
            "Broad sportsbook alignment (9/9) supports the current market view on Meizhou Kejia."
          ],
          "title": "Current Market Narrative"
        },
        "market_source": "closing_1x2",
        "max_gap_pp": 5.3,
        "model_validation": {
          "score_label_key": "mi_mv_pass",
          "status": "pass"
        },
        "model_validation_label": "Pass",
        "outcome_separation": {
          "breakdown": [
            "No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
            "Favourite exceeds second outcome by 6.6 pp (at 38.5%)."
          ],
          "lead_gap_pp": 6.6,
          "max_prob_pct": 38.5,
          "note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
          "tier": "medium",
          "tier_label": "Medium"
        },
        "outcome_separation_label": "Medium",
        "overall_assessment": {
          "badge_class": "moderate",
          "largest_gap_label": "Nanjing City",
          "largest_gap_pp": -5.3,
          "lead": "The closing market prices Nanjing City higher than the statistical model.",
          "level": "moderate",
          "max_gap_pp": 5.3,
          "title": "Moderate Disagreement"
        },
        "rows": [
          {
            "difference_pp": 3.24,
            "edge_pp": 3.24,
            "fair_prob_pct": 38.49,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Meizhou Kejia",
            "market_prob_pct": 35.25,
            "side": "home",
            "signal_key": "aligned",
            "signal_label": "Aligned"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": 2.06,
            "edge_pp": 2.06,
            "fair_prob_pct": 29.57,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Draw",
            "market_prob_pct": 27.51,
            "side": "draw",
            "signal_key": "aligned",
            "signal_label": "Aligned"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": -5.3,
            "edge_pp": -5.3,
            "fair_prob_pct": 31.94,
            "is_hero": true,
            "label": "Nanjing City",
            "market_prob_pct": 37.24,
            "side": "away",
            "signal_key": "market_higher",
            "signal_label": "Market Higher"
          }
        ],
        "status": "market_ahead",
        "status_label": "Market Ahead",
        "steam_note": "Market activity is currently concentrated on Meizhou Kejia.",
        "unavailable_note": ""
      },
      "interpretation": {
        "has_conflict": true,
        "paragraphs": [
          "The betting market strongly prefers Nanjing City (35.2%).",
          "This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Meizhou Kejia, Market \u2192 Nanjing City, Recent sharp money \u2192 recent line movement.",
          "Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
        ],
        "show": true,
        "title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
      },
      "lifecycle": {
        "closing_implied_pct": 40.16,
        "closing_odds": 2.49,
        "closing_reason": "",
        "closing_status": "recorded",
        "closing_status_label": "Recorded",
        "clv_pending": true,
        "clv_pp": 0.0,
        "clv_reason": "",
        "clv_status": "pending",
        "context": "match",
        "current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
        "current_stage_detail": "",
        "current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
        "entry_implied_pct": 40.16,
        "entry_odds": 2.49,
        "match_phase": "upcoming",
        "match_phase_detail": "",
        "match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
        "match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
        "model_validation_label": "Pass",
        "model_validation_status": "pass",
        "stages": [
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "forecast_generated",
            "label": "Prediction Generated",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "market_detected",
            "label": "Market Compared",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "model_validated",
            "label": "Validation Passed",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "PRE1",
            "id": "closing_recorded",
            "label": "Closing Recorded",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "clv_evaluated",
            "label": "CLV Evaluated",
            "status": "pending"
          }
        ]
      },
      "market_move_intelligence": {
        "show": false
      },
      "market_overview": {
        "breadth_display": "9/9",
        "current_odds": 2.55,
        "move_display": "+0.0%",
        "open_odds": 2.55,
        "pick_team": "Meizhou Kejia",
        "steam_score": 30,
        "steam_team_name": "Meizhou Kejia",
        "steam_tier": "C"
      },
      "premium_teaser": {
        "current_divergence_pp": 5.3,
        "divergence_label": "Current divergence",
        "title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
        "unlock_items": [
          "Historical similar matches",
          "Closing odds analysis",
          "CLV tracking",
          "Sharp money signals",
          "Market efficiency rating",
          "Historical model vs market results"
        ],
        "unlock_label": "Unlock"
      },
      "show": true
    },
    "match": {
      "at2.away_team_slug": "nanjing-city",
      "away_expected_goals": null,
      "away_goal_display": null,
      "away_team_display_name": "Nanjing City",
      "away_team_id": 16619,
      "away_team_logo": "/static/teams/16619.webp",
      "away_team_name": "Nanjing City",
      "away_team_public_id": "3spsoaBZFRQgCi",
      "away_team_slug": "nanjing-city",
      "country_code": "CN",
      "country_display_name": "China",
      "country_flag": "/static/images/country/cn.svg",
      "country_id": 32,
      "country_name": "China",
      "fixture_id": 1528712,
      "goals_away": null,
      "goals_home": null,
      "home_expected_goals": null,
      "home_goal_display": null,
      "home_team_country": "China",
      "home_team_display_name": "Meizhou Kejia",
      "home_team_id": 1439,
      "home_team_logo": "/static/teams/1439.webp",
      "home_team_name": "Meizhou Kejia",
      "home_team_public_id": "2bh9VglAnrqlhU",
      "home_team_slug": "meizhou-kejia",
      "ht.home_team_slug": "meizhou-kejia",
      "league_country": "China",
      "league_country_display": "China",
      "league_display_name": "Liga Satu China",
      "league_id": 170,
      "league_logo": "/static/leagues/170.webp",
      "league_name": "Liga Satu China",
      "league_public_id": "0Z8NZOcuHfzq60",
      "league_season": 2026,
      "match_date": "2026-09-13 11:30:00",
      "public_id": "5M11mY7uyFVkAN",
      "score_fulltime_away": null,
      "score_fulltime_home": null,
      "score_penalty_away": null,
      "score_penalty_home": null,
      "status_long": "Not Started",
      "status_short": "NS",
      "venue_city": "Meizhou",
      "venue_name": "Wuhua County Olympic Sports Centre"
    },
    "match_decision": {
      "confidence": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
          "pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
          "pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
          "Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
          "At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
        ],
        "score": 6.0
      },
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
          "away": {
            "alpha": 0.4143,
            "best_odd": 2.49,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.0219,
            "ev": -0.1274,
            "implied_prob": 0.3724,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.3724,
              "draw": 0.2751,
              "home": 0.3525
            },
            "model_prob": 0.3195,
            "p_final": 0.3505
          },
          "draw": {
            "alpha": 0.2907,
            "best_odd": 3.37,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.006,
            "ev": -0.0525,
            "implied_prob": 0.2751,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.3724,
              "draw": 0.2751,
              "home": 0.3525
            },
            "model_prob": 0.2959,
            "p_final": 0.2812
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "alpha": 0.4283,
            "best_odd": 2.63,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.0137,
            "ev": -0.0367,
            "implied_prob": 0.3525,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.3724,
              "draw": 0.2751,
              "home": 0.3525
            },
            "model_prob": 0.3846,
            "p_final": 0.3663
          }
        },
        "1x2_outlier": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
          "away": {
            "best_odd": 2.49,
            "edge": -0.0821,
            "ev": -0.2044,
            "implied_prob": 0.4016,
            "model_prob": 0.3195
          },
          "draw": {
            "best_odd": 3.37,
            "edge": -0.0009,
            "ev": -0.0029,
            "implied_prob": 0.2967,
            "model_prob": 0.2959
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "best_odd": 2.63,
            "edge": 0.0044,
            "ev": 0.0116,
            "implied_prob": 0.3802,
            "model_prob": 0.3846
          }
        },
        "btts": {
          "alpha_no": 0.2181,
          "alpha_yes": 0.2399,
          "best_no_odd": 2.2,
          "best_yes_odd": 1.67,
          "btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
          "edge_no": 0.0212,
          "edge_yes": -0.0212,
          "ev_available": true,
          "ev_no": 0.0032,
          "ev_no_risk_adj": -0.0761,
          "ev_yes": -0.0915,
          "ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0935,
          "implied_no": 0.4348,
          "implied_yes": 0.5652,
          "market_first": {
            "available": true,
            "mode": "market_first_btts",
            "n_bookmakers": 7,
            "no": {
              "alpha": 0.2181,
              "best_odd": 2.1,
              "edge": 0.0045,
              "ev": -0.0761,
              "implied_prob": 0.4355,
              "model_prob": 0.456,
              "p_final": 0.44
            },
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "yes": {
              "alpha": 0.2399,
              "best_odd": 1.62,
              "edge": -0.0049,
              "ev": -0.0935,
              "implied_prob": 0.5645,
              "model_prob": 0.544,
              "p_final": 0.5596
            }
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 7,
          "p_final_no": 0.44,
          "p_final_yes": 0.5596,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "reliability": "medium"
        },
        "ou25": {
          "alpha_over": 0.2465,
          "alpha_under": 0.2241,
          "best_over_odd": 1.86,
          "best_under_odd": 2.0,
          "consensus_over_odd": 1.79,
          "consensus_under_odd": 1.91,
          "edge_over": -0.0351,
          "edge_under": 0.0351,
          "ev_available": true,
          "ev_over": -0.1035,
          "ev_over_risk_adj": -0.0911,
          "ev_under": 0.036,
          "ev_under_risk_adj": -0.0613,
          "implied_over": 0.5171,
          "implied_over_mf": 0.5162,
          "implied_under": 0.4829,
          "implied_under_mf": 0.4838,
          "market_first": {
            "available": true,
            "mode": "market_first_ou",
            "n_bookmakers": 8,
            "over": {
              "alpha": 0.2465,
              "best_odd": 1.79,
              "edge": -0.0084,
              "ev": -0.0911,
              "implied_prob": 0.5162,
              "model_prob": 0.482,
              "p_final": 0.5078
            },
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "under": {
              "alpha": 0.2241,
              "best_odd": 1.91,
              "edge": 0.0077,
              "ev": -0.0613,
              "implied_prob": 0.4838,
              "model_prob": 0.518,
              "p_final": 0.4915
            }
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 8,
          "ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
          "p_final_over": 0.5078,
          "p_final_under": 0.4915,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "reliability": "medium"
        }
      },
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "avoid",
        "code": "no_edge",
        "execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
        "insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
        "stake_mult": 0.0,
        "use_split_strip": true
      },
      "match_tier": "no_bet",
      "min_ev": 0.02,
      "total_xg": 2.6,
      "variance_flag": false
    },
    "unified_decision": {
      "actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
      "algorithm": {
        "enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
        "game_typing_module": true,
        "version": "2.5.0"
      },
      "balanced_alternative": null,
      "best_consensus_ev": 0.036,
      "best_outlier_ev": 0.036,
      "best_tracked_ev": 0.036,
      "confidence": 4.0,
      "decision_confidence_v1": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)"
        ],
        "breakdown_v2": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Thin consensus value",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "score": 3.0,
        "score_v1_legacy": 4.0,
        "score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.2,
        "strength_v2": true
      },
      "decision_strength_v2": {
        "breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Thin consensus value",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "score": 3.0,
        "score_pre_penalty": 3.2
      },
      "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
      "execution": {
        "1x2_dominant": false,
        "1x2_open_contest": true,
        "grade": "C",
        "stake_factor": 0.0
      },
      "favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
        "active": false,
        "gap": null,
        "side": null
      },
      "final_action": "no_bet",
      "final_decision": {
        "action": "no_bet",
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": false,
          "direction_key": "conflict",
          "gap_pp": 5.3,
          "key": "conflict",
          "label": "Disagree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 5.3,
          "summary": "The market has repriced Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Meizhou Kejia."
        },
        "alignment_key": "conflict",
        "best_consensus_ev": 0.036,
        "best_outlier_ev": 0.036,
        "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
        "decision_strength": 3.0,
        "decision_strength_v1": 4.0,
        "decision_strength_v2": 3.2,
        "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
        "execution_confidence": 37,
        "extreme_disagreement": false,
        "final_verdict_audit": {
          "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
          "action_label": "Action",
          "decision": "No Primary Bet",
          "is_primary": false,
          "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Meizhou Kejia at 38.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 35.2%.",
          "why": [
            {
              "text": "Decision Model identifies Meizhou Kejia as the value side (38.5%)",
              "tone": "ok"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Edge does not clear Primary threshold",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
              "tone": "bad"
            }
          ],
          "why_label": "Decision Summary"
        },
        "gap_pp": 3.2,
        "gates_failed": [
          "Execution confidence below 65"
        ],
        "has_top_pick": false,
        "headline": "No Primary Bet",
        "hero_mode": "default",
        "icon": "\u25cb",
        "label": "No Primary Bet",
        "market_signal": "The market has repriced Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Meizhou Kejia.",
        "model_conflict_detail": null,
        "model_lean": "Meizhou Kejia",
        "no_primary_reasons": {
          "all_triggered": [
            "market_conflict",
            "market_quality",
            "edge_low",
            "calibration_risk"
          ],
          "calibration_mode": "soft",
          "codes": [
            "market_conflict",
            "market_quality"
          ],
          "label": "Reason",
          "other_factors": [
            {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            }
          ],
          "other_label": "Other factors",
          "primary": {
            "code": "market_conflict",
            "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
            "name": "Market Conflict",
            "short": "Market Conflict",
            "subtype": "probability_gap",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "secondary": {
            "code": "market_quality",
            "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
            "name": "Market Quality Risk",
            "short": "Market Quality Risk",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "version": "v1"
        },
        "outlier_detected": false,
        "outlier_excluded_panel": "",
        "primary_allowed": false,
        "primary_block_explain": {
          "entries": [
            {
              "key": "weak_ev",
              "label": "Consensus EV +3.6% \u003c Primary gate +5.0% (Lean gate +2.0% is separate \u2014 not Primary)",
              "ok": false
            },
            {
              "key": "gate",
              "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
              "ok": false
            }
          ],
          "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
          "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
          "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
          "title": "Why not Primary?"
        },
        "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +3.6% \u274c (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
        "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +3.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
        "primary_gates": {
          "items": [
            {
              "key": "extreme_gap",
              "label": "Extreme gap",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "no"
            },
            {
              "key": "xg_calibration",
              "label": "xG calibration",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "warning"
            },
            {
              "key": "reliability",
              "label": "Rel",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "84 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "execution",
              "label": "Exec",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "37 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "alignment",
              "label": "Align",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "conflict"
            },
            {
              "key": "consensus_ev",
              "label": "ConsEV",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "+3.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
            },
            {
              "key": "top_pick",
              "label": "Pick",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "false"
            },
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            }
          ],
          "passed": 4,
          "total": 8
        },
        "primary_type": null,
        "reasons": [
          "The market has repriced Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Meizhou Kejia.",
          "Decision strength: 3.0/10",
          "Execution confidence below 65"
        ],
        "reliability_score": 84,
        "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
        "strength_v2_breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Thin consensus value",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "subline": "The market has repriced Meizhou Kejia, but the model still strongly favours Meizhou Kejia.",
        "thresholds": {
          "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
          "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
          "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
          "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
          "min_execution": 65,
          "min_reliability": 65,
          "min_strength": 7.0,
          "source": "db",
          "user_id": 2
        },
        "thresholds_source": "db",
        "thresholds_user_id": 2,
        "tier": "observe",
        "validation_ok": true,
        "value_context": {
          "consensus_ev": -0.0367,
          "consensus_ev_display": "-3.7%",
          "consensus_odds": 2.63,
          "disagreement_label": "Normal",
          "disagreement_level": "normal",
          "implied_prob": 0.3525,
          "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
          "model_prob": 0.3846,
          "raw_edge_display": "+3.2 percentage points",
          "raw_edge_pp": 3.2,
          "raw_implied_prob": 0.3802281368821293,
          "raw_signal_ev": 0.0115,
          "raw_signal_ev_display": "+1.1%"
        },
        "version": "v2.5",
        "xg_calibration": {
          "block_value_alert": false,
          "calibration_status": "warning",
          "deviation_pct": 1.5,
          "reasons": [
            "Thin xG separation gap=0.14"
          ],
          "recommended_action": "monitor",
          "strength_delta": -1.0,
          "uplift_away": null,
          "uplift_home": null,
          "xg_separation": {
            "band": "low",
            "block_value_alert": false,
            "separation_score": -10,
            "strength_delta": -1.0,
            "xg_gap": 0.14
          }
        }
      },
      "game_type": {
        "label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
        "scoring_type": "balanced",
        "signals": {
          "btts_yes_prob": 0.544,
          "draw_prob": 0.2959,
          "max_1x2_prob": 0.3846,
          "over_prob": 0.482,
          "total_xg": 2.6,
          "under_prob": 0.518,
          "xg_diff": 0.14
        },
        "type": "balanced",
        "typing_weights_enabled": true
      },
      "hero_display_pick": {
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "ev": 0.036,
        "hero_display_only": true,
        "implied_prob": 0.4829,
        "market": "ou_2_5",
        "model_prob": 0.518,
        "not_dominant": false,
        "risk_band": "strong",
        "risk_tier": "hero_display",
        "side": "under",
        "slot": "hero_display"
      },
      "hero_mode": "default",
      "longshot_picks": [],
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "consensus_odds": 2.63,
          "decision": "no_bet",
          "edge": 0.0137,
          "ev": -0.0367,
          "implied_prob": 0.3525,
          "max_ev_side": "home",
          "model_prob": 0.3846,
          "side": "home",
          "side_label": "Meizhou Kejia"
        },
        "btts": {
          "decision": "small_edge",
          "decision_layer": {
            "alpha": 0.2181,
            "available": true,
            "consensus_odds": 2.1,
            "edge": 0.0045,
            "market_prob": 0.4355,
            "mode": "market_first_btts",
            "model_prob": 0.456,
            "n_bookmakers": 7,
            "no": {
              "alpha": 0.2181,
              "best_odd": 2.1,
              "edge": 0.0045,
              "ev": -0.0761,
              "implied_prob": 0.4355,
              "model_prob": 0.456,
              "p_final": 0.44
            },
            "p_final": 0.44,
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "risk_adj_ev": -0.0761,
            "value_side": "no",
            "yes": {
              "alpha": 0.2399,
              "best_odd": 1.62,
              "edge": -0.0049,
              "ev": -0.0935,
              "implied_prob": 0.5645,
              "model_prob": 0.544,
              "p_final": 0.5596
            }
          },
          "edge": 0.0212,
          "ev": 0.0032,
          "implied_prob": 0.4348,
          "model_prob": 0.456,
          "side": "no",
          "value_side": "no"
        },
        "ou_2_5": {
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "decision_layer": {
            "alpha": 0.2241,
            "available": true,
            "consensus_odds": 1.91,
            "edge": 0.0077,
            "market_prob": 0.4838,
            "mode": "market_first_ou",
            "model_prob": 0.518,
            "n_bookmakers": 8,
            "over": {
              "alpha": 0.2465,
              "best_odd": 1.79,
              "edge": -0.0084,
              "ev": -0.0911,
              "implied_prob": 0.5162,
              "model_prob": 0.482,
              "p_final": 0.5078
            },
            "p_final": 0.4915,
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "risk_adj_ev": -0.0613,
            "under": {
              "alpha": 0.2241,
              "best_odd": 1.91,
              "edge": 0.0077,
              "ev": -0.0613,
              "implied_prob": 0.4838,
              "model_prob": 0.518,
              "p_final": 0.4915
            },
            "value_side": "under"
          },
          "edge": 0.0351,
          "ev": 0.036,
          "implied_prob": 0.4829,
          "model_prob": 0.518,
          "side": "under",
          "value_side": "under"
        }
      },
      "match_id": 1528712,
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "optional",
        "actionable": false,
        "clear_edge": false,
        "code": "thin_edge",
        "execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
        "insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
        "max_valid_ev": 0.036,
        "min_ev": 0.02,
        "stake_mult": 0.25,
        "use_split_strip": true
      },
      "match_tier": "value_game",
      "no_clear_primary": false,
      "probabilities": {
        "away": 0.3195,
        "draw": 0.2959,
        "home": 0.3846
      },
      "reason_codes": [
        "no_ev_1x2"
      ],
      "secondary_pick": null,
      "secondary_picks": [],
      "show_betting_primary_label": false,
      "suppressed_primary": null,
      "teams": {
        "away": "Nanjing City",
        "home": "Meizhou Kejia"
      },
      "top_pick": null,
      "valid_markets_count": 1,
      "value_context_1x2": {
        "consensus_ev": -0.0367,
        "consensus_ev_display": "-3.7%",
        "consensus_odds": 2.63,
        "disagreement_label": "Normal",
        "disagreement_level": "normal",
        "implied_prob": 0.3525,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "model_prob": 0.3846,
        "raw_edge_display": "+3.2 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 3.2,
        "raw_implied_prob": 0.3802281368821293,
        "raw_signal_ev": 0.0115,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+1.1%"
      }
    }
  },
  "fixture_id": 1528712,
  "generated_at_utc": "2026-09-13T11:29:20.505606+00:00",
  "lang_id": "en"
}

Dapatkan Ramalan Premium untuk Meizhou Kejia & Nanjing City!

Buka analisis mendalam, tip pertaruhan eksklusif, dan ramalan perlawanan dengan perkhidmatan langganan premium kami.

Langgan Sekarang
Kembali ke Statistik
Liga Satu China Liga Satu China — Kedudukan
# PASUKAN P M S K Mata
1 Guangzhou E-Power 24 16 6 2 54
2 Guangxi Pingguo Haliao 24 13 6 5 45
3 Shenzhen Juniors 24 12 8 4 44
4 Nantong Zhiyun 23 10 9 4 39
5 Yanbian Longding 24 9 8 7 35
6 Shaanxi Union 23 9 6 8 33
7 Hebei Kungfu 24 8 7 9 31
8 Wuxi Wugou 23 8 5 10 29
9 Changchun Yatai 23 10 3 10 29
10 Ningbo Professional 23 9 5 9 29
11 Dalian Huayi 23 7 8 8 29
12 Suzhou Dongwu 24 7 8 9 26
13 Heilongjiang Lava Spring 24 4 11 9 23
14 Nanjing City 24 5 6 13 21
15 Meizhou Kejia 24 7 3 14 15
16 Dongguan United 24 2 7 15 13
# PASUKAN P J B +/- Mata
1 Guangzhou E-Power 24 48 20 +28 54
2 Guangxi Pingguo Haliao 24 40 26 +14 45
3 Shenzhen Juniors 24 39 25 +14 44
4 Changchun Yatai 23 37 38 -1 29
5 Shaanxi Union 23 35 26 +9 33
6 Wuxi Wugou 23 35 29 +6 29
7 Heilongjiang Lava Spring 24 35 46 -11 23
8 Yanbian Longding 24 33 27 +6 35
9 Nantong Zhiyun 23 31 20 +11 39
10 Dalian Huayi 23 30 33 -3 29
11 Suzhou Dongwu 24 28 33 -5 26
12 Ningbo Professional 23 27 29 -2 29
13 Meizhou Kejia 24 25 50 -25 15
14 Dongguan United 24 24 49 -25 13
15 Hebei Kungfu 24 22 25 -3 31
16 Nanjing City 24 20 33 -13 21