Statistik / Bola Sepak / Chile. Primera División Chile / Unión La Calera vs Everton de Viña del Mar

Unión La Calera vs Everton de Viña del Mar Statistics & Analysis

Jul 27, 2026 - 23:00
1 1.94
1 1.06
xG Accuracy: 76%
Laman pertaruhan premium stake: pengguna baharu boleh guna kod promo FHn2uDc1. Daftar sekarang

Pasaran yang dijejaki vs hasil sepenuh masa

Setiap baris membandingkan model pra-perlawanan lean dengan keputusan sepenuh masa.

  • Pasaran Ramalan Hasilnya Hasil
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 matlamat) ✖ tak betul
  • Kedua-dua Pasukan Menjaringkan Gol BTTS Ya Ya ✔ Betul
  • 1X2 Unión La Calera Lukis ✖ tak betul
  • Cerapan skor tepat 1-1, 2-1, 1-0, 2-0, 3-1 1-1 ✔ Betul

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 30, 2026 · 15:31 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-2520267

Closing Odds 2.49
AI Fair Odds 1.77
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Draw · Unión La Calera 1–1 Everton de Viña del Mar
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Probability Calibration

  • Expected: 56.5%
  • Historical Bucket: 55–60% — Building sample

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Intelijen pasaran

Bacaan selepas pilihan utama: bagaimana suapan penutup berprioriti bergerak berbanding model.

Ringkasan pasaran

Pasaran kekal stabil menjelang sepakan. Tiada anjakan implied ketara antara PRE30 dan PRE1 pada snapshot berprioriti.

Walaupun pergerakan lewat kecil, model masih menilai Unión La Calera (1X2),Lebih 2.5 gol jauh melebihi implied snapshot penutupan — bacaan statik "model vs harga", bukan kejaran steam.

Model masih melebihi implied penutupan pada Unión La Calera (1X2) kira-kira 17.8 mata peratus — isyarat salah harga paling jelas pada halaman ini.

Model vs implied penutup

Pasaran Model % Implied penutup % Jurang (pp)
Unión La Calera (1X2) 56.5 38.7 +17.8
Lukis (1X2) 24.5 30.2 -5.7
Everton de Viña del Mar (1X2) 19.0 31.1 -12.1
Lebih 2.5 gol 57.7 44.4 +13.3
Bawah 2.5 gol 42.3 55.6 -13.3
Apa maksudnya

Secara ringkas: model kira-kira 56.5% pada Unión La Calera (1X2), manakala snapshot penutup menunjukkan kira-kira 38.7%. Bezanya — kira-kira 17.8 mata peratus — ialah jurang model-vs-pasaran terbesar yang ditonjolkan di halaman ini.

Ringkas: "implied penutup" ialah kebarangkalian terbit daripada odds akhir yang ditangkap (selepas de-vig ringkas). "Jurang (pp)" = peratus model tolak implied tersebut, dalam mata peratus (pp).

Pergerakan garisan menjelang sepakan mula

Satu buku prioriti setiap snapshot (bukan semua). Laluan tangkapan: PRE30 → PRE1 · Buku: Pinnacle

Dalam kurungan pada lajur: Penutup = snapshot pertama tersedia ikut PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Awal = pertama dalam PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 yang berbeza daripada Penutup.

Odds terperinci dilipat di bawah — pergerakan implied (de-vig) boleh diabaikan.

Lihat jadual penuh baris demi baris
Pasaran Awal (PRE30) Penutup (PRE1) Δ tersirat (pp)
Unión La Calera (1X2) 2.49 2.49 0.0
Lukis (1X2) 3.19 3.19 0.0
Everton de Viña del Mar (1X2) 3.1 3.1 0.0
Lebih 2.5 gol 2.17 2.17 0.0
Bawah 2.5 gol 1.73 1.73 0.0

Taklimat AI untuk perlawanan ini belum tersedia. Selepas naik taraf pelayan, jalankan semula “Batch generate odds” untuk menjana ringkasan.

View technical JSON
{
  "bundle_version": 1,
  "content_hash": "37dc23f3e169eb110d3563a33dfde695ea934098dc8690626493fef930f06dfe",
  "decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
  "facts": {
    "ai_fp": {
      "away_predicted_xg": 1.06,
      "away_win_prob": 0.1896,
      "away_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "bayes_applied": 0,
      "btts_no_prob": 0.427,
      "btts_yes_prob": 0.573,
      "dc_rho": -0.13,
      "draw_prob": 0.2451,
      "draw_prob_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_away": 5.27,
      "fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_draw": 4.08,
      "fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_home": 1.77,
      "fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
      "home_predicted_xg": 1.94,
      "home_win_prob": 0.5652,
      "home_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "over_25_prob": 0.577,
      "prediction_confidence": "low",
      "under_25_prob": 0.423
    },
    "api_prediction": {
      "advice": "Double chance : draw or Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar",
      "main_pick_display": "Winner : Uni\u00f3n La Calera",
      "percent_away": "45%",
      "percent_draw": "45%",
      "percent_home": "10%",
      "winner_name": "Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar"
    },
    "away_xg": 1.06,
    "betting_insight": {
      "bet_label": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera",
      "confidence": 56.5,
      "main_pick_meta": {
        "confidence": "high",
        "display_text": "Winner : Uni\u00f3n La Calera",
        "edge": 0.178,
        "edge_gap": 0.3199,
        "market": "1X2",
        "market_prob": 0.387,
        "model_prob": 0.5651,
        "pick_type": "winner",
        "probabilities": {
          "away": 19.0,
          "draw": 24.5,
          "home": 56.5
        },
        "reason": "",
        "selection": "home",
        "selection_name": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera"
      },
      "market_comparison": [
        {
          "affi_link": "",
          "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
          "odd": 2.49
        }
      ],
      "risk_color": "#f44336",
      "risk_key": "high_risk",
      "stacked_market": null,
      "value_bet": {
        "best_odds": 2.49,
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "display_market": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera Win",
        "is_value": true,
        "label": "Home",
        "market_fair_odds": 2.58,
        "market_odds": 2.49,
        "model_odds": 1.77,
        "overround": 3.8,
        "prob_edge": 16.3,
        "value_pct": 40.7,
        "value_rating": "strong_value"
      }
    },
    "betting_markets": {
      "btts": {
        "away_clean_sheet": 5,
        "away_failed_to_score": 7,
        "away_played": 15,
        "away_score_rate": 65.4,
        "home_clean_sheet": 4,
        "home_failed_to_score": 5,
        "home_played": 15,
        "home_score_rate": 85.6,
        "no_prob": 42.7,
        "pick": "Yes",
        "pick_prob": 57.3,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": false,
        "yes_prob": 57.3
      },
      "correct_score": {
        "away_expected": 1.06,
        "home_expected": 1.94,
        "scores": [
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-1",
            "prob": 10.2
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 2,
            "label": "2-1",
            "prob": 9.9
          },
          {
            "away": 0,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-0",
            "prob": 9.7
          },
          {
            "away": 0,
            "home": 2,
            "label": "2-0",
            "prob": 9.4
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 3,
            "label": "3-1",
            "prob": 6.4
          }
        ],
        "source": "xG"
      },
      "double_chance": {
        "options": [
          {
            "key": "1X",
            "label": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera or Draw",
            "prob": 81.0
          },
          {
            "key": "12",
            "label": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera or Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar",
            "prob": 75.5
          },
          {
            "key": "X2",
            "label": "Draw or Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar",
            "prob": 43.5
          }
        ],
        "pick_key": "1X",
        "pick_label": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera or Draw",
        "pick_prob": 81.0
      },
      "match_winner": {
        "away_pct": 19.0,
        "draw_pct": 24.5,
        "home_pct": 56.5,
        "lean_key": "home",
        "lean_label": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera"
      },
      "over_under": {
        "api_hint": null,
        "avg_total": 3.0,
        "away_avg_scored": 1.1,
        "confidence": "medium",
        "home_avg_scored": 1.2,
        "over_prob": 57.7,
        "pick": "Over 2.5",
        "pick_prob": 57.7,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": false,
        "total_expected": 3.0,
        "under_prob": 42.3
      },
      "prob_source": "poisson",
      "value_bet_enhanced": {
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "edge": 40.7,
        "implied_prob": 40.2,
        "is_value": true,
        "label": "Home",
        "market": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera Win",
        "model_prob": 56.5,
        "odds": 2.49
      }
    },
    "closing_line_bundle": {
      "away_team": "Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar",
      "closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
        "away": 31.09,
        "draw": 30.21,
        "home": 38.7
      },
      "closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "closing_capture": "PRE1",
      "closing_fetched_at": "2026-07-27 22:59:02",
      "early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "early_capture": "PRE30",
      "early_fetched_at": "2026-07-27 22:29:32",
      "has_data": true,
      "home_team": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera",
      "largest_move_kind": null,
      "max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
      "model_vs_closing": [
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 38.7,
          "gap_pp": 17.8,
          "kind": "1x2_h",
          "model_pct": 56.51
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 30.21,
          "gap_pp": -5.7,
          "kind": "1x2_d",
          "model_pct": 24.51
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 31.09,
          "gap_pp": -12.11,
          "kind": "1x2_a",
          "model_pct": 18.98
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 44.36,
          "gap_pp": 13.34,
          "kind": "ou_o",
          "model_pct": 57.7
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 55.64,
          "gap_pp": -13.34,
          "kind": "ou_u",
          "model_pct": 42.3
        }
      ],
      "movement": [
        {
          "closing": 2.49,
          "early": 2.49,
          "implied_closing_pct": 38.7,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 38.7,
          "kind": "1x2_h"
        },
        {
          "closing": 3.19,
          "early": 3.19,
          "implied_closing_pct": 30.21,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 30.21,
          "kind": "1x2_d"
        },
        {
          "closing": 3.1,
          "early": 3.1,
          "implied_closing_pct": 31.09,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 31.09,
          "kind": "1x2_a"
        },
        {
          "closing": 2.17,
          "early": 2.17,
          "implied_closing_pct": 44.36,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 44.36,
          "kind": "ou_o"
        },
        {
          "closing": 1.73,
          "early": 1.73,
          "implied_closing_pct": 55.64,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 55.64,
          "kind": "ou_u"
        }
      ],
      "movement_negligible": true,
      "same_bookmaker": true,
      "top_value_gap": {
        "gap_pp": 17.8,
        "kind": "1x2_h"
      }
    },
    "correct_score_insight": {
      "best_value": null,
      "most_likely": {
        "label": "1-1",
        "prob": 10.2
      }
    },
    "home_xg": 1.94,
    "homepage_pick": {
      "best_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "best_odds": 2.47,
      "confidence": "moderate",
      "display_label": "Home Uni\u00f3n La Calera",
      "edge": 16.0,
      "ev": 39.5,
      "probability": 56.5
    },
    "market_cards": [
      {
        "authority_action": "value_alert",
        "authority_note": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
        "consensus_odds": 2.49,
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "disagreement_label": "Strong",
        "disagreement_level": "strong",
        "ev": 0.1099,
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 11.0,
          "text": "+11.0%"
        },
        "featured": true,
        "id": "1x2",
        "implied_prob": 0.387,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "max_ev": 0.1099,
        "max_ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 11.0,
          "text": "+11.0%"
        },
        "model_prob": 0.5651,
        "raw_edge_display": "+17.8 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 17.8,
        "raw_signal_ev": 0.4071,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+40.7%",
        "show_primary_label": false,
        "side_label": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera",
        "sort_key": 10248.91,
        "tier": "best"
      },
      {
        "decision": "lean",
        "ev_available": false,
        "ev_over": null,
        "ev_over_display": null,
        "ev_under": null,
        "ev_under_display": null,
        "featured": false,
        "id": "ou_2_5",
        "max_ev": null,
        "over_prob": 57.7,
        "sort_key": 4050.0,
        "tier": "lean",
        "under_prob": 42.3,
        "value_side": "over"
      },
      {
        "decision": "lean",
        "ev_available": false,
        "ev_no": null,
        "ev_no_display": null,
        "ev_yes": null,
        "ev_yes_display": null,
        "featured": false,
        "id": "btts",
        "max_ev": null,
        "no_prob": 42.7,
        "sort_key": 4050.0,
        "tier": "lean",
        "value_side": "yes",
        "yes_prob": 57.3
      },
      {
        "featured": false,
        "id": "correct_score",
        "sort_key": 810.6,
        "tier": "risk",
        "top_label": "1-1",
        "top_prob": 10.2
      }
    ],
    "market_intelligence": {
      "betting_signal": {
        "alert_breadth": "11/13",
        "alert_breadth_note": "11/13 sportsbooks confirmed",
        "alert_move": "\u2191 +15.2%",
        "alert_team": "Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar",
        "alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
        "divergence_pp": 17.8,
        "has_alert": true,
        "hero_edge_pp": 17.82,
        "hero_label": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera",
        "market_prob_pct": 38.7,
        "market_team": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera",
        "model_prob_pct": 56.5,
        "model_team": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera",
        "show": true,
        "status_icon": "!",
        "status_key": "caution",
        "status_label": "Use caution",
        "status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
        "steam_score": 53,
        "steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
        "steam_tier": "B",
        "title": "Betting Signal"
      },
      "decision_chain": {
        "academy_links": [
          {
            "key": "market_disagree",
            "read_min": 5,
            "title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
            "url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "steam",
            "read_min": 4,
            "title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
            "url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "clv_pending",
            "read_min": 3,
            "title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
            "url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
          }
        ],
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": true,
          "direction_key": "agree",
          "gap_pp": 17.8,
          "key": "agree",
          "label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": false,
          "pricing_key": "low",
          "probability_gap_pp": 17.8,
          "summary": "Model and market favour the same side (Uni\u00f3n La Calera), but pricing still diverges by 17.8 pp."
        },
        "authority": {
          "action": "value_alert",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": true,
            "direction_key": "agree",
            "gap_pp": 17.8,
            "key": "agree",
            "label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": false,
            "pricing_key": "low",
            "probability_gap_pp": 17.8,
            "summary": "Model and market favour the same side (Uni\u00f3n La Calera), but pricing still diverges by 17.8 pp."
          },
          "alignment_key": "agree",
          "best_consensus_ev": 0.1099,
          "best_outlier_ev": 0.407,
          "confidence_band": "Moderate",
          "decision_strength": 6.9,
          "decision_strength_v1": 7.0,
          "decision_strength_v2": 6.9,
          "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
          "execution_confidence": 52,
          "extreme_disagreement": false,
          "final_verdict_audit": {
            "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
            "action_label": "Action",
            "decision": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet",
            "is_primary": false,
            "snapshot": "The AI model sees Uni\u00f3n La Calera at 56.5% vs market 38.7%.",
            "why": [
              {
                "text": "AI identifies Uni\u00f3n La Calera as the stronger side (56.5%)",
                "tone": "ok"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
                "tone": "ok"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                "tone": "bad"
              }
            ],
            "why_label": "Decision Summary"
          },
          "gap_pp": 17.8,
          "gates_failed": [
            "Execution confidence below 65"
          ],
          "has_top_pick": true,
          "headline": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet",
          "hero_mode": "default",
          "icon": "\u25c6",
          "label": "Value Alert \u2014 not Primary",
          "market_signal": "Direction aligns with model lean; pricing still diverges",
          "model_conflict_detail": null,
          "model_lean": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera",
          "no_primary_reasons": {
            "all_triggered": [
              "market_quality"
            ],
            "calibration_mode": null,
            "codes": [
              "market_quality"
            ],
            "label": "Reason",
            "other_factors": [],
            "other_label": "Other factors",
            "primary": {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "secondary": null,
            "version": "v1"
          },
          "outlier_detected": true,
          "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Uni\u00f3n La Calera \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.49 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +41% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1505474 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.49 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +11.0% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
          "primary_allowed": false,
          "primary_block_explain": {
            "entries": [
              {
                "key": "positive_ev",
                "label": "Consensus EV +11.0% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                "ok": true
              },
              {
                "key": "gate",
                "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
                "ok": false
              }
            ],
            "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
            "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
            "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
            "title": "Why not Primary?"
          },
          "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +11.0% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 6.9/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
          "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +11.0% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 6.9/10 (display only)",
          "primary_gates": {
            "items": [
              {
                "key": "extreme_gap",
                "label": "Extreme gap",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "no"
              },
              {
                "key": "xg_calibration",
                "label": "xG calibration",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "ok"
              },
              {
                "key": "reliability",
                "label": "Rel",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "66 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "execution",
                "label": "Exec",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "52 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "alignment",
                "label": "Align",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "agree"
              },
              {
                "key": "consensus_ev",
                "label": "ConsEV",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "+11.0% (\u2265+5.0%)"
              },
              {
                "key": "top_pick",
                "label": "Pick",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              },
              {
                "key": "validation",
                "label": "Validation",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              }
            ],
            "passed": 7,
            "total": 8
          },
          "primary_type": null,
          "reasons": [
            "Model and market favour the same side (Uni\u00f3n La Calera), but pricing still diverges by 17.8 pp.",
            "Decision strength: 6.9/10",
            "Execution confidence below 65",
            "Outlier price +41% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
          ],
          "reliability_score": 66,
          "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
          "strength_v2_breakdown": [
            "Base decision score (v1)",
            "Reliability supports action",
            "Market aligns with model",
            "Consensus-line +EV"
          ],
          "subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
          "thresholds": {
            "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
            "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
            "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
            "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
            "min_execution": 65,
            "min_reliability": 65,
            "min_strength": 7.0,
            "source": "db",
            "user_id": 2
          },
          "thresholds_source": "db",
          "thresholds_user_id": 2,
          "tier": "lean",
          "validation_ok": true,
          "value_context": {
            "consensus_ev": 0.1099,
            "consensus_ev_display": "+11.0%",
            "consensus_odds": 2.49,
            "disagreement_label": "Strong",
            "disagreement_level": "strong",
            "implied_prob": 0.387,
            "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
            "model_prob": 0.5651,
            "raw_edge_display": "+17.8 percentage points",
            "raw_edge_pp": 17.8,
            "raw_implied_prob": 0.4016064257028112,
            "raw_signal_ev": 0.4071,
            "raw_signal_ev_display": "+40.7%"
          },
          "version": "v2.5",
          "xg_calibration": {
            "block_value_alert": false,
            "calibration_status": "ok",
            "deviation_pct": 43.7,
            "reasons": [],
            "recommended_action": "ok",
            "strength_delta": 0.0,
            "uplift_away": null,
            "uplift_home": null
          }
        },
        "bet_status": "value_alert",
        "books_breadth_display": "11/13",
        "breadth_ratio": 0.8461538461538461,
        "evidence": {
          "score": 86,
          "signals": [
            {
              "icon": "\u2713",
              "key": "statistical_edge",
              "label": "Statistical edge detected",
              "status": "pass"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "market_agreement",
              "label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
              "status": "caution"
            },
            {
              "icon": "\u2713",
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Market drift supports model side (direction only \u2014 not pricing convergence)",
              "status": "pass"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation warning",
              "status": "caution"
            }
          ],
          "stars": 4,
          "tier": "high",
          "tier_label": "High"
        },
        "forecast_reliability": {
          "breakdown": [
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation: Warning",
              "tone": "caution"
            },
            {
              "key": "gap",
              "label": "Large market gap (18 pp)",
              "tone": "caution"
            },
            {
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Market drift aligns with model",
              "tone": "ok"
            }
          ],
          "parts": {
            "alignment": 16.1,
            "data_quality": 12.0,
            "market_coverage": 8.5,
            "steam_coherence": 10.0,
            "validation": 14.0
          },
          "score": 66,
          "stars": 3,
          "tier": "moderate",
          "tier_label": "Moderate"
        },
        "lean_gap_pp": 17.82,
        "market_agreement": "weak",
        "max_gap_pp": 17.82,
        "model_calibration": {
          "away_xg": 1.06,
          "calibration_status": "ok",
          "deviation_pct": 44.0,
          "elevated": false,
          "home_xg": 1.94,
          "impact_note": "",
          "league_avg_xg": 1.35,
          "peak_xg": 1.94,
          "status_label": "Within typical league range",
          "summary": "Home xG 1.94 \u00b7 Away xG 1.06 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +44%",
          "title": "Model Calibration Check"
        },
        "move_is_drift": true,
        "mv_status": "warning",
        "odds_delta_pct": 15.2,
        "steam_conflicts": false,
        "steam_move_display": "\u2191 +15.2%",
        "steam_team": "Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar",
        "suppress_execution": false,
        "value_split": {
          "execution_confidence": {
            "label": "Betting Confidence",
            "score": 52,
            "tier": "moderate",
            "tier_label": "Moderate"
          },
          "market_compatibility": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 11,
            "tier": "not_reliable",
            "tier_label": "Not reliable"
          },
          "model_edge_strength": {
            "label": "Model Signal Strength",
            "score": 56,
            "tier": "moderate",
            "tier_label": "Moderate"
          },
          "model_value": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 11,
            "tier": "not_reliable",
            "tier_label": "Not reliable"
          },
          "recommendation": {
            "action": "value_alert",
            "label": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet"
          }
        },
        "verdict": {
          "agree_note": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": true,
            "direction_key": "agree",
            "gap_pp": 17.8,
            "key": "agree",
            "label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": false,
            "pricing_key": "low",
            "probability_gap_pp": 17.8,
            "summary": "Model and market favour the same side (Uni\u00f3n La Calera), but pricing still diverges by 17.8 pp."
          },
          "authority": {
            "action": "value_alert",
            "alignment": {
              "direction_aligned": true,
              "direction_key": "agree",
              "gap_pp": 17.8,
              "key": "agree",
              "label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
              "model_strong": false,
              "pricing_aligned": false,
              "pricing_key": "low",
              "probability_gap_pp": 17.8,
              "summary": "Model and market favour the same side (Uni\u00f3n La Calera), but pricing still diverges by 17.8 pp."
            },
            "alignment_key": "agree",
            "best_consensus_ev": 0.1099,
            "best_outlier_ev": 0.407,
            "confidence_band": "Moderate",
            "decision_strength": 6.9,
            "decision_strength_v1": 7.0,
            "decision_strength_v2": 6.9,
            "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
            "execution_confidence": 52,
            "extreme_disagreement": false,
            "final_verdict_audit": {
              "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
              "action_label": "Action",
              "decision": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet",
              "is_primary": false,
              "snapshot": "The AI model sees Uni\u00f3n La Calera at 56.5% vs market 38.7%.",
              "why": [
                {
                  "text": "AI identifies Uni\u00f3n La Calera as the stronger side (56.5%)",
                  "tone": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
                  "tone": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                  "tone": "bad"
                }
              ],
              "why_label": "Decision Summary"
            },
            "gap_pp": 17.8,
            "gates_failed": [
              "Execution confidence below 65"
            ],
            "has_top_pick": true,
            "headline": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet",
            "hero_mode": "default",
            "icon": "\u25c6",
            "label": "Value Alert \u2014 not Primary",
            "market_signal": "Direction aligns with model lean; pricing still diverges",
            "model_conflict_detail": null,
            "model_lean": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera",
            "no_primary_reasons": {
              "all_triggered": [
                "market_quality"
              ],
              "calibration_mode": null,
              "codes": [
                "market_quality"
              ],
              "label": "Reason",
              "other_factors": [],
              "other_label": "Other factors",
              "primary": {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "secondary": null,
              "version": "v1"
            },
            "outlier_detected": true,
            "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Uni\u00f3n La Calera \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.49 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +41% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1505474 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.49 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +11.0% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
            "primary_allowed": false,
            "primary_block_explain": {
              "entries": [
                {
                  "key": "positive_ev",
                  "label": "Consensus EV +11.0% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                  "ok": true
                },
                {
                  "key": "gate",
                  "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
                  "ok": false
                }
              ],
              "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
              "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
              "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
              "title": "Why not Primary?"
            },
            "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +11.0% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 6.9/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
            "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +11.0% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 6.9/10 (display only)",
            "primary_gates": {
              "items": [
                {
                  "key": "extreme_gap",
                  "label": "Extreme gap",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "no"
                },
                {
                  "key": "xg_calibration",
                  "label": "xG calibration",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "key": "reliability",
                  "label": "Rel",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "66 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "execution",
                  "label": "Exec",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "52 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "alignment",
                  "label": "Align",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "agree"
                },
                {
                  "key": "consensus_ev",
                  "label": "ConsEV",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "+11.0% (\u2265+5.0%)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "top_pick",
                  "label": "Pick",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                },
                {
                  "key": "validation",
                  "label": "Validation",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                }
              ],
              "passed": 7,
              "total": 8
            },
            "primary_type": null,
            "reasons": [
              "Model and market favour the same side (Uni\u00f3n La Calera), but pricing still diverges by 17.8 pp.",
              "Decision strength: 6.9/10",
              "Execution confidence below 65",
              "Outlier price +41% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
            ],
            "reliability_score": 66,
            "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
            "strength_v2_breakdown": [
              "Base decision score (v1)",
              "Reliability supports action",
              "Market aligns with model",
              "Consensus-line +EV"
            ],
            "subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
            "thresholds": {
              "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
              "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
              "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
              "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
              "min_execution": 65,
              "min_reliability": 65,
              "min_strength": 7.0,
              "source": "db",
              "user_id": 2
            },
            "thresholds_source": "db",
            "thresholds_user_id": 2,
            "tier": "lean",
            "validation_ok": true,
            "value_context": {
              "consensus_ev": 0.1099,
              "consensus_ev_display": "+11.0%",
              "consensus_odds": 2.49,
              "disagreement_label": "Strong",
              "disagreement_level": "strong",
              "implied_prob": 0.387,
              "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
              "model_prob": 0.5651,
              "raw_edge_display": "+17.8 percentage points",
              "raw_edge_pp": 17.8,
              "raw_implied_prob": 0.4016064257028112,
              "raw_signal_ev": 0.4071,
              "raw_signal_ev_display": "+40.7%"
            },
            "version": "v2.5",
            "xg_calibration": {
              "block_value_alert": false,
              "calibration_status": "ok",
              "deviation_pct": 43.7,
              "reasons": [],
              "recommended_action": "ok",
              "strength_delta": 0.0,
              "uplift_away": null,
              "uplift_home": null
            }
          },
          "headline": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet",
          "icon": "\u25c6",
          "label": "Value Alert \u2014 not Primary",
          "subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
          "tier": "lean"
        },
        "why": {
          "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
          "bullets": [
            "Model: Uni\u00f3n La Calera 1.94 xG vs Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar 1.06 \u2192 Uni\u00f3n La Calera 56.5%",
            "Market: Uni\u00f3n La Calera ~38.7% implied",
            "Market Drift: Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar odds \u2191 +15.2%"
          ],
          "one_liner": "Model leans Uni\u00f3n La Calera, but market pricing diverges by 18 pp.",
          "title": "Why?"
        }
      },
      "edge_rows": [
        {
          "edge_pp": 17.82,
          "fair_prob": 56.52,
          "label": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera",
          "market_prob": 38.7,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "home"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -5.7,
          "fair_prob": 24.51,
          "label": "Draw",
          "market_prob": 30.21,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "draw"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -12.13,
          "fair_prob": 18.96,
          "label": "Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar",
          "market_prob": 31.09,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "away"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 57.7,
          "label": "Over 2.5",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "over"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 42.3,
          "label": "Under 2.5",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "under"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 57.3,
          "label": "BTTS Yes",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "yes"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 42.7,
          "label": "BTTS No",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "no"
        }
      ],
      "edge_snapshot": {
        "edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
        "edge_pp": 17.82,
        "fair_prob_pct": 56.52,
        "hero_side": "home",
        "hero_team_name": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera",
        "market_prob_pct": 38.7,
        "status": "strong_disagreement",
        "steam_team_name": "Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar"
      },
      "fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
      "fair_vs_market": {
        "closing_capture": "PRE1",
        "closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "comparison_available": true,
        "comparison_disabled": false,
        "comparison_summary": "The statistical model estimates Uni\u00f3n La Calera\u0027s win probability at 56.5%, compared with the closing market\u0027s implied probability of 38.7%, a difference of 17.8 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model\u0027s assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
        "degraded_note": "",
        "divergence_guard": {
          "divergence_level": "strong",
          "edge_status": "strong_disagreement",
          "max_gap_pp": 17.82,
          "suppress_hero": false,
          "suppress_value_language": false
        },
        "divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
        "divergence_level": "strong",
        "divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
        "divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
        "divergence_tier": "strong",
        "edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
        "edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
        "fair_confidence": "medium",
        "fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
        "fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "forecast_assessment": {
          "favourite_class": "Slight favourite",
          "favourite_label": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera",
          "forecast_certainty_tier": "high",
          "headline": "Slight edge match",
          "market_agreement_label": "Weak",
          "market_direction": {
            "label": "Supports model direction",
            "positive": true
          },
          "market_prob_pct": 38.7,
          "model_prob_gap_display": "+17.8 percentage points",
          "model_prob_gap_pp": 17.8,
          "model_prob_pct": 56.5,
          "outcome_separation_tier": "high",
          "paragraphs": [],
          "pricing_convergence": {
            "gap_display": "+17.8 percentage points",
            "gap_pp": 17.8,
            "label": "Low convergence",
            "label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_low"
          },
          "reliability_headline": "Moderate reliability",
          "reliability_icon": "\u2713",
          "reliability_score": 66,
          "reliability_tier": "moderate",
          "summary": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera \u2014 market direction supports the model, but pricing still diverges (+17.8 pp).",
          "tier": "slight_edge",
          "title": "Prediction Assessment",
          "validation_label": "Warning",
          "value_split": {
            "execution_confidence": {
              "label": "Betting Confidence",
              "score": 52,
              "tier": "moderate",
              "tier_label": "Moderate"
            },
            "market_compatibility": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 11,
              "tier": "not_reliable",
              "tier_label": "Not reliable"
            },
            "model_edge_strength": {
              "label": "Model Signal Strength",
              "score": 56,
              "tier": "moderate",
              "tier_label": "Moderate"
            },
            "model_value": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 11,
              "tier": "not_reliable",
              "tier_label": "Not reliable"
            },
            "recommendation": {
              "action": "value_alert",
              "label": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet"
            }
          },
          "why": {
            "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
            "bullets": [
              "Model: Uni\u00f3n La Calera 1.94 xG vs Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar 1.06 \u2192 Uni\u00f3n La Calera 56.5%",
              "Market: Uni\u00f3n La Calera ~38.7% implied",
              "Market Drift: Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar odds \u2191 +15.2%"
            ],
            "one_liner": "Model leans Uni\u00f3n La Calera, but market pricing diverges by 18 pp.",
            "title": "Why?"
          }
        },
        "forecast_certainty": {
          "note": "One outcome clearly leads the model 1X2 grid.",
          "tier": "high",
          "tier_label": "High"
        },
        "forecast_certainty_label": "High",
        "has_market_probs": true,
        "hero_edge_pp": 17.82,
        "hero_label": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera",
        "hero_side": "home",
        "market_activity": "Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar odds lengthened \u2191 +15.2%.",
        "market_agreement": "weak",
        "market_agreement_label": "Weak",
        "market_interpretation": {
          "bullets": [
            "The model may see a slower-scoring or closer matchup than the market.",
            "Monitor line movement before kickoff \u2014 not a betting recommendation."
          ],
          "follow_up": "However, Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 15.2%, suggesting weakening support.",
          "gap_tier": "strong",
          "lead": "The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Uni\u00f3n La Calera.",
          "note": "Drift away from Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar \u2014 odds lengthened by 15.2% (weakening support).",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Uni\u00f3n La Calera.",
            "However, Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 15.2%, suggesting weakening support.",
            "Drift away from Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar \u2014 odds lengthened by 15.2% (weakening support)."
          ],
          "quiet_market": false,
          "title": "Market Assessment"
        },
        "market_narrative": {
          "paragraphs": [
            "The fair estimate favors Uni\u00f3n La Calera more strongly than current market pricing.",
            "At the same time, Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar has drifted \u2014 odds lengthened by 15.2%, suggesting weakening support.",
            "Broad sportsbook alignment (11/13) supports the current market view on Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar."
          ],
          "title": "Current Market Narrative"
        },
        "market_source": "closing_1x2",
        "max_gap_pp": 17.82,
        "model_validation": {
          "score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
          "status": "warning"
        },
        "model_validation_label": "Warning",
        "outcome_separation": {
          "breakdown": [
            "Favourite exceeds second outcome by 32.0 pp (at 56.5%)."
          ],
          "lead_gap_pp": 32.0,
          "max_prob_pct": 56.5,
          "note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
          "tier": "high",
          "tier_label": "High"
        },
        "outcome_separation_label": "High",
        "overall_assessment": {
          "badge_class": "strong",
          "largest_gap_label": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera",
          "largest_gap_pp": 17.8,
          "lead": "The model rates Uni\u00f3n La Calera considerably stronger than the closing betting market.",
          "level": "strong",
          "max_gap_pp": 17.8,
          "title": "Strong Disagreement"
        },
        "rows": [
          {
            "difference_pp": 17.82,
            "edge_pp": 17.82,
            "fair_prob_pct": 56.52,
            "is_hero": true,
            "label": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera",
            "market_prob_pct": 38.7,
            "side": "home",
            "signal_key": "model_edge",
            "signal_label": "Model Edge"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": -5.7,
            "edge_pp": -5.7,
            "fair_prob_pct": 24.51,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Draw",
            "market_prob_pct": 30.21,
            "side": "draw",
            "signal_key": "market_higher",
            "signal_label": "Market Higher"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": -12.13,
            "edge_pp": -12.13,
            "fair_prob_pct": 18.96,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar",
            "market_prob_pct": 31.09,
            "side": "away",
            "signal_key": "market_higher",
            "signal_label": "Market Higher"
          }
        ],
        "status": "strong_disagreement",
        "status_label": "Strong Disagreement",
        "steam_note": "Drift away from Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar \u2014 odds lengthened by 15.2% (weakening support).",
        "unavailable_note": ""
      },
      "interpretation": {
        "has_conflict": false,
        "paragraphs": [
          "The betting market strongly prefers Uni\u00f3n La Calera (38.7%).",
          "However, Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar has seen one of the strongest multi-book drifts of the day (\u2191 +15.2%, 11/13) \u2014 odds lengthened, not shortened.",
          "Uni\u00f3n La Calera \u2014 market direction supports the model, but pricing still diverges (+17.8 pp)."
        ],
        "show": true,
        "title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
      },
      "lifecycle": {
        "closing_implied_pct": 40.16,
        "closing_odds": 2.49,
        "closing_reason": "",
        "closing_status": "recorded",
        "closing_status_label": "Recorded",
        "clv_pending": true,
        "clv_pp": 0.0,
        "clv_reason": "",
        "clv_status": "pending",
        "context": "match",
        "current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
        "current_stage_detail": "",
        "current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
        "entry_implied_pct": 40.16,
        "entry_odds": 2.49,
        "match_phase": "upcoming",
        "match_phase_detail": "",
        "match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
        "match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
        "model_validation_label": "Warning",
        "model_validation_status": "warning",
        "stages": [
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "forecast_generated",
            "label": "Prediction Generated",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "market_detected",
            "label": "Market Compared",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "model_validated",
            "label": "Validation Passed",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "PRE1",
            "id": "closing_recorded",
            "label": "Closing Recorded",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "clv_evaluated",
            "label": "CLV Evaluated",
            "status": "pending"
          }
        ]
      },
      "market_move_intelligence": {
        "books_reacting": 11,
        "books_reacting_detail": [
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 8,
            "bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +15.2%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 15.2
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 32,
            "bookmaker_name": "Betano",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +10.7%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 10.7
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 7,
            "bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +10.7%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 10.7
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 3,
            "bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +10.3%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 10.3
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 36,
            "bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +9.1%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 9.1
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 9,
            "bookmaker_name": "Dafabet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +7.1%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 7.1
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 16,
            "bookmaker_name": "Unibet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +6.5%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 6.5
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 2,
            "bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +3.1%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 3.1
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 11,
            "bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.7%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 2.7
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 1,
            "bookmaker_name": "10Bet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.6%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 2.6
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 4,
            "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.6%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 2.6
          }
        ],
        "books_total": 13,
        "breadth_display": "11/13",
        "clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
        "clv_status": "evaluated",
        "current_odds": 2.88,
        "is_drift": true,
        "move_context": "Largest move today",
        "move_display": "\u2191 +15.2%",
        "move_pct_abs": 15.2,
        "move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
        "move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 231h 26m",
        "narrative_paragraphs": [
          "11/13 books lengthened Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar together (15.2% drift, score 53) \u2014 broad market fade, not a single-book blip.",
          "Noticeable drift \u2014 odds lengthened with multi-book confirmation (not steam)."
        ],
        "narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
        "odds_delta_pct": 15.2,
        "odds_path": {
          "chart_y_labels": [
            "3.10",
            "2.80",
            "2.50"
          ],
          "display": "3.11 \u2192 2.50 \u2192 2.88",
          "move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
          "move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 231h 26m",
          "pick_team": "Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar",
          "points": [
            {
              "label_key": "open",
              "value": "3.11"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "extreme",
              "value": "2.50"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "current",
              "value": "2.88"
            }
          ],
          "sparkline_points": [
            2.5,
            3.1,
            2.88
          ],
          "sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 28.0,0.0 56.0,6.6",
          "sparkline_trend": "up",
          "sparkline_trend_label": "One-way rise",
          "summary_boxes": [
            {
              "label_key": "open",
              "value": "2.50"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "low",
              "value": "2.50"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "high",
              "value": "3.10"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "current",
              "value": "2.88"
            }
          ]
        },
        "open_odds": 2.5,
        "page_alert_line": "Broad drift across 11/13 sportsbooks on Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar",
        "phase_label": "Market drift",
        "phase_tip": "Broad lengthening \u2014 market pricing moves against the tracked side.",
        "pick_team": "Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar",
        "ref_book": "Bet365",
        "seo_title_alert": "",
        "sharp_leader": "Bet365",
        "show": true,
        "signal_badge_class": "fade",
        "signal_icon": "\ud83d\udcc9",
        "signal_impact": {
          "current_odds": 2.88,
          "is_drift": true,
          "label": "Market Signal",
          "move_display": "\u2191 +15.2%",
          "open_odds": 2.5,
          "summary": "Broad market drift supports the same direction as the model lean.",
          "team": "Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar",
          "tone": "with"
        },
        "signal_key": "strong_drift",
        "signal_label": "Strong drift",
        "steam_score": 53,
        "steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
        "steam_tier": "B",
        "title": "Market Move Intelligence"
      },
      "market_overview": {
        "breadth_display": "11/13",
        "current_odds": 2.88,
        "move_display": "\u2191 +15.2%",
        "open_odds": 2.5,
        "pick_team": "Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar",
        "steam_score": 53,
        "steam_team_name": "Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar",
        "steam_tier": "B"
      },
      "premium_teaser": {
        "current_divergence_pp": 17.8,
        "divergence_label": "Current divergence",
        "title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
        "unlock_items": [
          "Historical similar matches",
          "Closing odds analysis",
          "CLV tracking",
          "Sharp money signals",
          "Market efficiency rating",
          "Historical model vs market results"
        ],
        "unlock_label": "Unlock"
      },
      "show": true
    },
    "match": {
      "away_expected_goals": null,
      "away_goal_display": null,
      "away_team_display_name": "Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar",
      "away_team_id": 2325,
      "away_team_logo": "/static/teams/2325.webp",
      "away_team_name": "Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar",
      "away_team_slug": "everton-de-vina",
      "country_code": "CL",
      "country_display_name": "Chile",
      "country_flag": "/static/images/country/cl.svg",
      "country_id": 31,
      "country_name": "Chile",
      "fixture_id": 1505474,
      "goals_away": null,
      "goals_home": null,
      "home_expected_goals": null,
      "home_goal_display": null,
      "home_team_country": "Chile",
      "home_team_display_name": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera",
      "home_team_id": 2326,
      "home_team_logo": "/static/teams/2326.webp",
      "home_team_name": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera",
      "home_team_slug": "union-la-calera",
      "league_country": "Chile",
      "league_country_display": "Chile",
      "league_display_name": "Primera Divisi\u00f3n Chile",
      "league_id": 265,
      "league_logo": "/static/leagues/265.webp",
      "league_name": "Primera Divisi\u00f3n Chile",
      "league_season": 2026,
      "match_date": "2026-07-27 23:00:00",
      "score_fulltime_away": null,
      "score_fulltime_home": null,
      "score_penalty_away": null,
      "score_penalty_home": null,
      "status_long": "Not Started",
      "status_short": "NS",
      "venue_city": "La Calera",
      "venue_name": null
    },
    "match_decision": {
      "confidence": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
        ],
        "score": 8.0
      },
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
          "away": {
            "alpha": 0.2455,
            "best_odd": 3.1,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.0297,
            "ev": -0.1285,
            "implied_prob": 0.3109,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.3109,
              "draw": 0.3021,
              "home": 0.387
            },
            "model_prob": 0.1898,
            "p_final": 0.2811
          },
          "draw": {
            "alpha": 0.2744,
            "best_odd": 3.19,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.0156,
            "ev": -0.0862,
            "implied_prob": 0.3021,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.3109,
              "draw": 0.3021,
              "home": 0.387
            },
            "model_prob": 0.2451,
            "p_final": 0.2865
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "alpha": 0.3298,
            "best_odd": 2.49,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.0587,
            "ev": 0.1099,
            "implied_prob": 0.387,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.3109,
              "draw": 0.3021,
              "home": 0.387
            },
            "model_prob": 0.5651,
            "p_final": 0.4458
          }
        },
        "1x2_outlier": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
          "away": {
            "best_odd": 3.1,
            "edge": -0.1328,
            "ev": -0.4117,
            "implied_prob": 0.3226,
            "model_prob": 0.1898
          },
          "draw": {
            "best_odd": 3.19,
            "edge": -0.0683,
            "ev": -0.218,
            "implied_prob": 0.3135,
            "model_prob": 0.2451
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "best_odd": 2.49,
            "edge": 0.1635,
            "ev": 0.407,
            "implied_prob": 0.4016,
            "model_prob": 0.5651
          }
        },
        "btts": {
          "ev_available": false,
          "n_bookmakers": 0,
          "reliability": "low"
        },
        "ou25": {
          "ev_available": false,
          "n_bookmakers": 0,
          "reliability": "low"
        }
      },
      "match_tier": "value_game",
      "min_ev": 0.02,
      "total_xg": 3.0,
      "variance_flag": false
    },
    "unified_decision": {
      "actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
      "algorithm": {
        "enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
        "game_typing_module": true,
        "version": "2.5.0"
      },
      "balanced_alternative": null,
      "best_consensus_ev": 0.1099,
      "best_outlier_ev": 0.407,
      "best_tracked_ev": 0.1099,
      "confidence": 7.0,
      "decision_confidence_v1": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
          "pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Primary line identified (+1.0)",
          "Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)"
        ],
        "breakdown_v2": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market aligns with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV"
        ],
        "score": 6.9,
        "score_v1_legacy": 7.0,
        "score_v2_pre_penalty": 6.9,
        "strength_v2": true
      },
      "decision_strength_v2": {
        "breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market aligns with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV"
        ],
        "score": 6.9,
        "score_pre_penalty": 6.9
      },
      "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
      "execution": {
        "1x2_dominant": true,
        "1x2_open_contest": false,
        "grade": "A",
        "stake_factor": 1.0
      },
      "favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
        "active": false,
        "gap": null,
        "side": null
      },
      "final_action": "value_alert",
      "final_decision": {
        "action": "value_alert",
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": true,
          "direction_key": "agree",
          "gap_pp": 17.8,
          "key": "agree",
          "label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": false,
          "pricing_key": "low",
          "probability_gap_pp": 17.8,
          "summary": "Model and market favour the same side (Uni\u00f3n La Calera), but pricing still diverges by 17.8 pp."
        },
        "alignment_key": "agree",
        "best_consensus_ev": 0.1099,
        "best_outlier_ev": 0.407,
        "confidence_band": "Moderate",
        "decision_strength": 6.9,
        "decision_strength_v1": 7.0,
        "decision_strength_v2": 6.9,
        "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
        "execution_confidence": 52,
        "extreme_disagreement": false,
        "final_verdict_audit": {
          "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
          "action_label": "Action",
          "decision": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet",
          "is_primary": false,
          "snapshot": "The AI model sees Uni\u00f3n La Calera at 56.5% vs market 38.7%.",
          "why": [
            {
              "text": "AI identifies Uni\u00f3n La Calera as the stronger side (56.5%)",
              "tone": "ok"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
              "tone": "ok"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
              "tone": "bad"
            }
          ],
          "why_label": "Decision Summary"
        },
        "gap_pp": 17.8,
        "gates_failed": [
          "Execution confidence below 65"
        ],
        "has_top_pick": true,
        "headline": "AI Value Alert - No Primary Bet",
        "hero_mode": "default",
        "icon": "\u25c6",
        "label": "Value Alert \u2014 not Primary",
        "market_signal": "Direction aligns with model lean; pricing still diverges",
        "model_conflict_detail": null,
        "model_lean": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera",
        "no_primary_reasons": {
          "all_triggered": [
            "market_quality"
          ],
          "calibration_mode": null,
          "codes": [
            "market_quality"
          ],
          "label": "Reason",
          "other_factors": [],
          "other_label": "Other factors",
          "primary": {
            "code": "market_quality",
            "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
            "name": "Market Quality Risk",
            "short": "Market Quality Risk",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "secondary": null,
          "version": "v1"
        },
        "outlier_detected": true,
        "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Uni\u00f3n La Calera \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.49 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +41% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1505474 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.49 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +11.0% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
        "primary_allowed": false,
        "primary_block_explain": {
          "entries": [
            {
              "key": "positive_ev",
              "label": "Consensus EV +11.0% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
              "ok": true
            },
            {
              "key": "gate",
              "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
              "ok": false
            }
          ],
          "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
          "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
          "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
          "title": "Why not Primary?"
        },
        "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +11.0% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 6.9/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
        "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +11.0% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 6.9/10 (display only)",
        "primary_gates": {
          "items": [
            {
              "key": "extreme_gap",
              "label": "Extreme gap",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "no"
            },
            {
              "key": "xg_calibration",
              "label": "xG calibration",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "ok"
            },
            {
              "key": "reliability",
              "label": "Rel",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "66 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "execution",
              "label": "Exec",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "52 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "alignment",
              "label": "Align",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "agree"
            },
            {
              "key": "consensus_ev",
              "label": "ConsEV",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "+11.0% (\u2265+5.0%)"
            },
            {
              "key": "top_pick",
              "label": "Pick",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            },
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            }
          ],
          "passed": 7,
          "total": 8
        },
        "primary_type": null,
        "reasons": [
          "Model and market favour the same side (Uni\u00f3n La Calera), but pricing still diverges by 17.8 pp.",
          "Decision strength: 6.9/10",
          "Execution confidence below 65",
          "Outlier price +41% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
        ],
        "reliability_score": 66,
        "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
        "strength_v2_breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market aligns with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV"
        ],
        "subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
        "thresholds": {
          "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
          "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
          "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
          "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
          "min_execution": 65,
          "min_reliability": 65,
          "min_strength": 7.0,
          "source": "db",
          "user_id": 2
        },
        "thresholds_source": "db",
        "thresholds_user_id": 2,
        "tier": "lean",
        "validation_ok": true,
        "value_context": {
          "consensus_ev": 0.1099,
          "consensus_ev_display": "+11.0%",
          "consensus_odds": 2.49,
          "disagreement_label": "Strong",
          "disagreement_level": "strong",
          "implied_prob": 0.387,
          "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
          "model_prob": 0.5651,
          "raw_edge_display": "+17.8 percentage points",
          "raw_edge_pp": 17.8,
          "raw_implied_prob": 0.4016064257028112,
          "raw_signal_ev": 0.4071,
          "raw_signal_ev_display": "+40.7%"
        },
        "version": "v2.5",
        "xg_calibration": {
          "block_value_alert": false,
          "calibration_status": "ok",
          "deviation_pct": 43.7,
          "reasons": [],
          "recommended_action": "ok",
          "strength_delta": 0.0,
          "uplift_away": null,
          "uplift_home": null
        }
      },
      "game_type": {
        "label_zh": "\u5f3a\u4fe1\u53f7\uff08\u4f4e\u65b9\u5dee\uff09",
        "scoring_type": "strong_signal",
        "signals": {
          "btts_yes_prob": 0.573,
          "draw_prob": 0.2451,
          "max_1x2_prob": 0.5651,
          "over_prob": 0.577,
          "total_xg": 3.0,
          "under_prob": 0.423,
          "xg_diff": 0.88
        },
        "type": "strong_signal",
        "typing_weights_enabled": true
      },
      "hero_display_pick": null,
      "hero_mode": "default",
      "longshot_picks": [],
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "consensus_odds": 2.49,
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "edge": 0.0587,
          "ev": 0.1099,
          "implied_prob": 0.387,
          "max_ev_side": "home",
          "model_prob": 0.5651,
          "side": "home",
          "side_label": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera"
        },
        "btts": {
          "decision": "lean",
          "edge": null,
          "ev": null,
          "implied_prob": null,
          "model_prob": 0.573,
          "side": "yes",
          "value_side": "yes"
        },
        "ou_2_5": {
          "decision": "lean",
          "edge": null,
          "ev": null,
          "implied_prob": null,
          "model_prob": 0.577,
          "side": "over",
          "value_side": "over"
        }
      },
      "match_id": 1505474,
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "bet",
        "actionable": true,
        "clear_edge": true,
        "code": "clear_edge",
        "execution_line_key": null,
        "insight_line_key": null,
        "max_valid_ev": 0.1099,
        "min_ev": 0.02,
        "stake_mult": 1.0,
        "use_split_strip": false
      },
      "match_tier": "value_game",
      "no_clear_primary": false,
      "probabilities": {
        "away": 0.1898,
        "draw": 0.2451,
        "home": 0.5651
      },
      "reason_codes": [
        "high_total_goals"
      ],
      "secondary_pick": null,
      "secondary_picks": [],
      "show_betting_primary_label": false,
      "suppressed_primary": null,
      "teams": {
        "away": "Everton de Vi\u00f1a del Mar",
        "home": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera"
      },
      "top_pick": {
        "composite_score": 0.074525,
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "ev": 0.1099,
        "implied_prob": 0.387,
        "market": "1x2",
        "model_prob": 0.5651,
        "not_dominant": false,
        "primary_strength": "clear",
        "risk_band": "strong",
        "risk_tier": "primary",
        "side": "home",
        "side_label": "Uni\u00f3n La Calera",
        "slot": "primary",
        "speculative_primary": false
      },
      "valid_markets_count": 1,
      "value_context_1x2": {
        "consensus_ev": 0.1099,
        "consensus_ev_display": "+11.0%",
        "consensus_odds": 2.49,
        "disagreement_label": "Strong",
        "disagreement_level": "strong",
        "implied_prob": 0.387,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "model_prob": 0.5651,
        "raw_edge_display": "+17.8 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 17.8,
        "raw_implied_prob": 0.4016064257028112,
        "raw_signal_ev": 0.4071,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+40.7%"
      }
    }
  },
  "fixture_id": 1505474,
  "generated_at_utc": "2026-07-27T22:59:07.266791+00:00",
  "lang_id": "en"
}

Dapatkan Ramalan Premium untuk Unión La Calera & Everton de Viña del Mar!

Buka analisis mendalam, tip pertaruhan eksklusif, dan ramalan perlawanan dengan perkhidmatan langganan premium kami.

Langgan Sekarang
Kembali ke Statistik
Primera División Chile Primera División Chile — Kedudukan
# PASUKAN P M S K Mata
1 Colo Colo 23 17 3 3 54
2 Universidad Católica 23 13 3 7 42
3 Universidad de Chile 23 12 6 5 42
4 Everton de Viña del Mar 23 10 6 7 36
5 Palestino 23 11 3 9 36
6 Deportes Limache 23 10 3 10 33
7 Ñublense 23 8 8 7 32
8 Concepción 23 9 4 10 31
9 Deportes La Serena 23 7 9 7 30
10 Coquimbo Unido 22 8 5 9 29
11 Audax Italiano 23 7 7 9 28
12 O'Higgins 23 8 3 12 27
13 Huachipato 21 7 4 10 25
14 Cobresal 23 7 3 13 24
15 Universidad de Concepción 22 6 4 12 22
16 Unión La Calera 23 4 5 14 17
# PASUKAN P J B +/- Mata
1 Universidad Católica 23 50 33 +17 42
2 Colo Colo 23 48 22 +26 54
3 Deportes Limache 23 43 35 +8 33
4 Everton de Viña del Mar 23 37 25 +12 36
5 Palestino 23 36 33 +3 36
6 Universidad de Chile 23 35 19 +16 42
7 Deportes La Serena 23 34 38 -4 30
8 Cobresal 23 34 44 -10 24
9 Coquimbo Unido 22 31 31 0 29
10 Huachipato 21 29 39 -10 25
11 Ñublense 23 28 31 -3 32
12 O'Higgins 23 28 36 -8 27
13 Audax Italiano 23 26 31 -5 28
14 Concepción 23 25 26 -1 31
15 Unión La Calera 23 19 40 -21 17
16 Universidad de Concepción 22 17 37 -20 22
# PASUKAN P xG xGC +/- Mata
1 Universidad Católica 23 1.5 1.2 +0.3 42
2 Ñublense 23 1.2 1.5 -0.3 32
3 Colo Colo 23 — — — 54
4 Universidad de Chile 23 — — — 42
5 Everton de Viña del Mar 23 — — — 36
6 Palestino 23 — — — 36
7 Deportes Limache 23 — — — 33
8 Concepción 23 — — — 31
9 Deportes La Serena 23 — — — 30
10 Coquimbo Unido 22 — — — 29
11 Audax Italiano 23 — — — 28
12 O'Higgins 23 — — — 27
13 Huachipato 21 — — — 25
14 Cobresal 23 — — — 24
15 Universidad de Concepción 22 — — — 22
16 Unión La Calera 23 — — — 17
Primera División Chile Chile. Primera División Chile Ramalan