Statistik / Bola Sepak / Argentina. Primera C / General Lamadrid vs Leones de Rosario

General Lamadrid vs Leones de Rosario Statistics & Analysis

Sep 20, 2026 - 18:00
1 1.36
1 1.24
xG Accuracy: 85%
Laman pertaruhan premium stake: pengguna baharu boleh guna kod promo FHn2uDc1. Daftar sekarang

Pasaran yang dijejaki vs hasil sepenuh masa

Setiap baris membandingkan model pra-perlawanan lean dengan keputusan sepenuh masa.

  • Pasaran Ramalan Hasilnya Hasil
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 matlamat) ✖ tak betul
  • Kedua-dua Pasukan Menjaringkan Gol BTTS Ya Ya ✔ Betul
  • 1X2 General Lamadrid Lukis ✖ tak betul
  • Cerapan skor tepat 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 1-1 ✔ Betul

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 14, 2026 · 03:42 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-8709584

Closing Odds Pending
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Draw · General Lamadrid 1–1 Leones de Rosario
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Taklimat AI untuk perlawanan ini belum tersedia. Selepas naik taraf pelayan, jalankan semula “Batch generate odds” untuk menjana ringkasan.

View technical JSON
{
  "bundle_version": 1,
  "content_hash": "1d153be98b3d4ee6b2bc98ed9c1c713a286e4593e3164828134b76f27f0affd2",
  "decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
  "facts": {
    "ai_fp": {
      "away_predicted_xg": 1.24,
      "away_win_prob": 0.3239,
      "away_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "bayes_applied": 0,
      "btts_no_prob": 0.456,
      "btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
      "dc_rho": -0.13,
      "draw_prob": 0.2959,
      "draw_prob_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_away": 3.09,
      "fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_draw": 3.38,
      "fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_home": 2.63,
      "fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
      "home_predicted_xg": 1.36,
      "home_win_prob": 0.3801,
      "home_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "over_25_prob": 0.482,
      "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
      "under_25_prob": 0.518
    },
    "api_prediction": {
      "advice": "Combo Double chance : draw or Leones de Rosario and -3.5 goals",
      "main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
      "percent_away": "45%",
      "percent_draw": "45%",
      "percent_home": "10%",
      "winner_name": "Leones de Rosario"
    },
    "away_xg": 1.24,
    "betting_insight": {
      "bet_label": "General Lamadrid",
      "confidence": null,
      "main_pick_meta": {
        "confidence": "low",
        "display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
        "edge": 0.061,
        "edge_gap": 0.0566,
        "market": "1X2",
        "market_prob": 0.3193,
        "model_prob": 0.3803,
        "pick_type": "no_strong",
        "probabilities": {
          "away": 32.4,
          "draw": 29.6,
          "home": 38.0
        },
        "reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
        "selection": null,
        "selection_name": null
      },
      "market_comparison": [
        {
          "affi_link": "",
          "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
          "odd": 2.79
        }
      ],
      "risk_color": null,
      "risk_key": null,
      "stacked_market": null,
      "value_bet": {
        "best_odds": 2.79,
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "display_market": "General Lamadrid Win",
        "is_value": true,
        "label": "Home",
        "market_fair_odds": 3.13,
        "market_odds": 2.79,
        "model_odds": 2.63,
        "overround": 12.2,
        "prob_edge": 2.2,
        "value_pct": 6.1,
        "value_rating": "small_value"
      }
    },
    "betting_markets": {
      "btts": {
        "away_clean_sheet": 14,
        "away_failed_to_score": 10,
        "away_played": 28,
        "away_score_rate": 71.1,
        "home_clean_sheet": 15,
        "home_failed_to_score": 12,
        "home_played": 28,
        "home_score_rate": 74.3,
        "no_prob": 45.6,
        "pick": "Yes",
        "pick_prob": 54.4,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": true,
        "yes_prob": 54.4
      },
      "correct_score": {
        "away_expected": 1.24,
        "home_expected": 1.36,
        "scores": [
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-1",
            "prob": 12.5
          },
          {
            "away": 0,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-0",
            "prob": 10.1
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 0,
            "label": "0-1",
            "prob": 9.2
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 2,
            "label": "2-1",
            "prob": 8.5
          },
          {
            "away": 2,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-2",
            "prob": 7.8
          }
        ],
        "source": "xG"
      },
      "double_chance": {
        "options": [
          {
            "key": "1X",
            "label": "General Lamadrid or Draw",
            "prob": 67.6
          },
          {
            "key": "12",
            "label": "General Lamadrid or Leones de Rosario",
            "prob": 70.4
          },
          {
            "key": "X2",
            "label": "Draw or Leones de Rosario",
            "prob": 62.0
          }
        ],
        "pick_key": "12",
        "pick_label": "General Lamadrid or Leones de Rosario",
        "pick_prob": 70.4
      },
      "match_winner": {
        "away_pct": 32.4,
        "draw_pct": 29.6,
        "home_pct": 38.0,
        "lean_key": "home",
        "lean_label": "General Lamadrid"
      },
      "over_under": {
        "api_hint": "-3.5",
        "avg_total": 2.6,
        "away_avg_scored": 0.9,
        "confidence": "low",
        "home_avg_scored": 0.8,
        "over_prob": 48.2,
        "pick": "Over 2.5",
        "pick_prob": 51.8,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": true,
        "total_expected": 2.6,
        "under_prob": 51.8
      },
      "prob_source": "poisson",
      "value_bet_enhanced": {
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "edge": 6.1,
        "implied_prob": 35.8,
        "is_value": true,
        "label": "Home",
        "market": "General Lamadrid Win",
        "model_prob": 38.0,
        "odds": 2.79
      }
    },
    "closing_line_bundle": {
      "away_team": "Leones de Rosario",
      "closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
        "away": 33.0,
        "draw": 35.07,
        "home": 31.93
      },
      "closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "closing_capture": "PRE1",
      "closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-20 17:59:57",
      "early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "early_capture": "PRE30",
      "early_fetched_at": "2026-09-20 17:31:06",
      "has_data": true,
      "home_team": "General Lamadrid",
      "largest_move_kind": null,
      "max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
      "model_vs_closing": [
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 31.93,
          "gap_pp": 6.1,
          "kind": "1x2_h",
          "model_pct": 38.03
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 35.07,
          "gap_pp": -5.48,
          "kind": "1x2_d",
          "model_pct": 29.59
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 33.0,
          "gap_pp": -0.62,
          "kind": "1x2_a",
          "model_pct": 32.37
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 30.54,
          "gap_pp": 17.66,
          "kind": "ou_o",
          "model_pct": 48.2
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 69.46,
          "gap_pp": -17.66,
          "kind": "ou_u",
          "model_pct": 51.8
        }
      ],
      "movement": [
        {
          "closing": 2.79,
          "early": 2.79,
          "implied_closing_pct": 31.93,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 31.93,
          "kind": "1x2_h"
        },
        {
          "closing": 2.54,
          "early": 2.54,
          "implied_closing_pct": 35.07,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 35.07,
          "kind": "1x2_d"
        },
        {
          "closing": 2.7,
          "early": 2.7,
          "implied_closing_pct": 33.0,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 33.0,
          "kind": "1x2_a"
        },
        {
          "closing": 2.98,
          "early": 2.98,
          "implied_closing_pct": 30.54,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 30.54,
          "kind": "ou_o"
        },
        {
          "closing": 1.31,
          "early": 1.31,
          "implied_closing_pct": 69.46,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 69.46,
          "kind": "ou_u"
        }
      ],
      "movement_negligible": true,
      "same_bookmaker": true,
      "top_value_gap": {
        "gap_pp": 17.7,
        "kind": "ou_o"
      }
    },
    "correct_score_insight": {
      "best_value": null,
      "lean_card": {
        "diff_pp": -4.2,
        "ev": -0.25,
        "has_edge": false,
        "label": "1-1",
        "market_odds": 6.0,
        "market_prob": 0.1667,
        "market_prob_pct": 16.7,
        "model_prob": 0.125,
        "model_prob_pct": 12.5,
        "n_bookmakers": 5,
        "status_key": "no_value"
      },
      "most_likely": {
        "label": "1-1",
        "prob": 12.5
      },
      "top5": [
        {
          "label": "1-1",
          "prob": 12.5
        },
        {
          "label": "1-0",
          "prob": 10.1
        },
        {
          "label": "0-1",
          "prob": 9.2
        },
        {
          "label": "2-1",
          "prob": 8.5
        },
        {
          "label": "1-2",
          "prob": 7.8
        }
      ]
    },
    "home_xg": 1.36,
    "homepage_pick": null,
    "market_cards": [
      {
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "decision_layer": {
          "alpha": 0.142,
          "available": true,
          "consensus_odds": 2.235,
          "edge": 0.02,
          "edge_pp": 2.0,
          "market_prob": 0.4032,
          "mode": "market_first_btts",
          "model_prob": 0.544,
          "n_bookmakers": 5,
          "no": {
            "alpha": 0.1952,
            "best_odd": 1.51,
            "edge": -0.0275,
            "ev": -0.1403,
            "implied_prob": 0.5968,
            "model_prob": 0.456,
            "p_final": 0.5693
          },
          "p_final": 0.4232,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "raw_edge_pp": 14.1,
          "raw_signal_ev": 0.2158,
          "risk_adj_ev": -0.0542,
          "value_side": "yes",
          "yes": {
            "alpha": 0.142,
            "best_odd": 2.235,
            "edge": 0.02,
            "ev": -0.0542,
            "implied_prob": 0.4032,
            "model_prob": 0.544,
            "p_final": 0.4232
          }
        },
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_no": -0.2613,
        "ev_no_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -26.1,
          "text": "-26.1%"
        },
        "ev_yes": 0.36,
        "ev_yes_display": {
          "capped": true,
          "raw_pct": 36.0,
          "text": "+25%+"
        },
        "featured": true,
        "id": "btts",
        "max_ev": 0.36,
        "n_bookmakers": 5,
        "no_prob": 45.6,
        "sort_key": 10474.0,
        "tier": "best",
        "value_side": "yes",
        "yes_prob": 54.4
      },
      {
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "decision_layer": {
          "alpha": 0.1337,
          "available": true,
          "consensus_odds": 2.93,
          "edge": 0.0229,
          "edge_pp": 2.3,
          "market_prob": 0.3106,
          "mode": "market_first_ou",
          "model_prob": 0.482,
          "n_bookmakers": 4,
          "over": {
            "alpha": 0.1337,
            "best_odd": 2.93,
            "edge": 0.0229,
            "ev": -0.0228,
            "implied_prob": 0.3106,
            "model_prob": 0.482,
            "p_final": 0.3335
          },
          "p_final": 0.3335,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "raw_edge_pp": 17.1,
          "raw_signal_ev": 0.4123,
          "risk_adj_ev": -0.0228,
          "under": {
            "alpha": 0.1839,
            "best_odd": 1.32,
            "edge": -0.0315,
            "ev": -0.1316,
            "implied_prob": 0.6894,
            "model_prob": 0.518,
            "p_final": 0.6579
          },
          "value_side": "over"
        },
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_over": 0.446,
        "ev_over_display": {
          "capped": true,
          "raw_pct": 44.6,
          "text": "+25%+"
        },
        "ev_under": -0.2955,
        "ev_under_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -29.5,
          "text": "-29.5%"
        },
        "featured": false,
        "id": "ou_2_5",
        "max_ev": 0.446,
        "n_bookmakers": 4,
        "over_prob": 48.2,
        "sort_key": 10401.4,
        "tier": "best",
        "under_prob": 51.8,
        "value_side": "over"
      },
      {
        "authority_action": "no_bet",
        "authority_note": "The market has repriced General Lamadrid, but the model still strongly favours General Lamadrid.",
        "consensus_odds": 2.79,
        "decision": "no_bet",
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "ev": -0.0395,
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -4.0,
          "text": "-4.0%"
        },
        "featured": false,
        "id": "1x2",
        "implied_prob": 0.3193,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "max_ev": -0.0395,
        "max_ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": -4.0,
          "text": "-4.0%"
        },
        "model_prob": 0.3803,
        "raw_edge_display": "+6.1 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 6.1,
        "raw_signal_ev": 0.061,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+6.1%",
        "show_primary_label": false,
        "side_label": "General Lamadrid",
        "sort_key": 1790.125,
        "tier": "bad_ev"
      },
      {
        "featured": false,
        "id": "correct_score",
        "sort_key": 817.5,
        "tier": "risk",
        "top_label": "1-1",
        "top_prob": 12.5
      }
    ],
    "market_intelligence": {
      "betting_signal": {
        "alert_breadth": "",
        "alert_breadth_note": "",
        "alert_move": "",
        "alert_team": "",
        "alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
        "divergence_pp": 6.1,
        "has_alert": false,
        "hero_edge_pp": 6.08,
        "hero_label": "General Lamadrid",
        "market_prob_pct": 31.9,
        "market_team": "Draw",
        "model_prob_pct": 38.0,
        "model_team": "General Lamadrid",
        "show": true,
        "status_icon": "\u2713",
        "status_key": "aligned",
        "status_label": "Reliable prediction",
        "status_line": "Direction aligned; check pricing gap separately",
        "steam_score": null,
        "steam_subtitle": "",
        "steam_tier": "",
        "title": "Betting Signal"
      },
      "decision_chain": {
        "academy_links": [
          {
            "key": "steam",
            "read_min": 4,
            "title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
            "url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "clv_pending",
            "read_min": 3,
            "title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
            "url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
          }
        ],
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": false,
          "direction_key": "conflict",
          "gap_pp": 6.1,
          "key": "conflict",
          "label": "Disagree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 6.1,
          "summary": "The market has repriced General Lamadrid, but the model still strongly favours General Lamadrid."
        },
        "authority": {
          "action": "no_bet",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": false,
            "direction_key": "conflict",
            "gap_pp": 6.1,
            "key": "conflict",
            "label": "Disagree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 6.1,
            "summary": "The market has repriced General Lamadrid, but the model still strongly favours General Lamadrid."
          },
          "alignment_key": "conflict",
          "best_consensus_ev": 0.446,
          "best_outlier_ev": 0.446,
          "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
          "decision_strength": 3.8,
          "decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
          "decision_strength_v2": 4.8,
          "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
          "execution_confidence": 36,
          "extreme_disagreement": false,
          "final_verdict_audit": {
            "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
            "action_label": "Action",
            "decision": "No Primary Bet",
            "is_primary": false,
            "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates General Lamadrid at 38.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 31.9%.",
            "why": [
              {
                "text": "Decision Model identifies General Lamadrid as the value side (38.0%)",
                "tone": "ok"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                "tone": "bad"
              },
              {
                "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
                "tone": "bad"
              }
            ],
            "why_label": "Decision Summary"
          },
          "gap_pp": 6.1,
          "gates_failed": [
            "Execution confidence below 65"
          ],
          "has_top_pick": true,
          "headline": "No Primary Bet",
          "hero_mode": "default",
          "icon": "\u25cb",
          "label": "No Primary Bet",
          "market_signal": "The market has repriced General Lamadrid, but the model still strongly favours General Lamadrid.",
          "model_conflict_detail": null,
          "model_lean": "General Lamadrid",
          "no_primary_reasons": {
            "all_triggered": [
              "market_conflict",
              "market_quality",
              "calibration_risk"
            ],
            "calibration_mode": "soft",
            "codes": [
              "market_conflict",
              "market_quality"
            ],
            "label": "Reason",
            "other_factors": [
              {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              }
            ],
            "other_label": "Other factors",
            "primary": {
              "code": "market_conflict",
              "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
              "name": "Market Conflict",
              "short": "Market Conflict",
              "subtype": "probability_gap",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "secondary": {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "version": "v1"
          },
          "outlier_detected": false,
          "outlier_excluded_panel": "",
          "primary_allowed": false,
          "primary_block_explain": {
            "entries": [
              {
                "key": "positive_ev",
                "label": "Consensus EV +44.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                "ok": true
              },
              {
                "key": "gate",
                "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
                "ok": false
              }
            ],
            "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
            "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
            "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
            "title": "Why not Primary?"
          },
          "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +44.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
          "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +44.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.8/10 (display only)",
          "primary_gates": {
            "items": [
              {
                "key": "extreme_gap",
                "label": "Extreme gap",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "no"
              },
              {
                "key": "xg_calibration",
                "label": "xG calibration",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "warning"
              },
              {
                "key": "reliability",
                "label": "Rel",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "81 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "execution",
                "label": "Exec",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "36 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "alignment",
                "label": "Align",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "conflict"
              },
              {
                "key": "consensus_ev",
                "label": "ConsEV",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "+44.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
              },
              {
                "key": "top_pick",
                "label": "Pick",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              },
              {
                "key": "validation",
                "label": "Validation",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              }
            ],
            "passed": 6,
            "total": 8
          },
          "primary_type": null,
          "reasons": [
            "The market has repriced General Lamadrid, but the model still strongly favours General Lamadrid.",
            "Decision strength: 3.8/10",
            "Execution confidence below 65"
          ],
          "reliability_score": 81,
          "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
          "strength_v2_breakdown": [
            "Base decision score (v1)",
            "Reliability supports action",
            "Market steam conflicts with model",
            "Consensus-line +EV",
            "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
          ],
          "subline": "The market has repriced General Lamadrid, but the model still strongly favours General Lamadrid.",
          "thresholds": {
            "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
            "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
            "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
            "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
            "min_execution": 65,
            "min_reliability": 65,
            "min_strength": 7.0,
            "source": "db",
            "user_id": 2
          },
          "thresholds_source": "db",
          "thresholds_user_id": 2,
          "tier": "observe",
          "validation_ok": true,
          "value_context": {
            "consensus_ev": -0.0395,
            "consensus_ev_display": "-4.0%",
            "consensus_odds": 2.79,
            "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
            "disagreement_level": "moderate",
            "implied_prob": 0.3193,
            "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
            "model_prob": 0.3803,
            "raw_edge_display": "+6.1 percentage points",
            "raw_edge_pp": 6.1,
            "raw_implied_prob": 0.35842293906810035,
            "raw_signal_ev": 0.061,
            "raw_signal_ev_display": "+6.1%"
          },
          "version": "v2.5",
          "xg_calibration": {
            "block_value_alert": false,
            "calibration_status": "warning",
            "deviation_pct": 0.7,
            "reasons": [
              "Thin xG separation gap=0.12"
            ],
            "recommended_action": "monitor",
            "strength_delta": -1.0,
            "uplift_away": null,
            "uplift_home": null,
            "xg_separation": {
              "band": "low",
              "block_value_alert": false,
              "separation_score": -10,
              "strength_delta": -1.0,
              "xg_gap": 0.12
            }
          }
        },
        "bet_status": "no_bet",
        "books_breadth_display": "6/8",
        "breadth_ratio": 0.75,
        "evidence": {
          "score": 75,
          "signals": [
            {
              "icon": "\u25cb",
              "key": "statistical_edge",
              "label": "No strong statistical edge",
              "status": "neutral"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "market_agreement",
              "label": "Recent market move conflicts with the model favourite",
              "status": "caution"
            },
            {
              "icon": "\u25cb",
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Sharp steam detected",
              "status": "neutral"
            },
            {
              "icon": "\u2713",
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation passed",
              "status": "pass"
            }
          ],
          "stars": 4,
          "tier": "high",
          "tier_label": "High"
        },
        "forecast_reliability": {
          "breakdown": [
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation: Pass",
              "tone": "ok"
            }
          ],
          "parts": {
            "alignment": 22.0,
            "data_quality": 12.0,
            "market_coverage": 7.5,
            "steam_coherence": 5.0,
            "validation": 30.0
          },
          "score": 81,
          "stars": 4,
          "tier": "high",
          "tier_label": "High"
        },
        "lean_gap_pp": 6.08,
        "market_agreement": "moderate",
        "max_gap_pp": 6.08,
        "model_calibration": {
          "away_xg": 1.24,
          "calibration_status": "ok",
          "deviation_pct": 1.0,
          "elevated": false,
          "home_xg": 1.36,
          "impact_note": "",
          "league_avg_xg": 1.35,
          "peak_xg": 1.36,
          "status_label": "Within typical league range",
          "summary": "Home xG 1.36 \u00b7 Away xG 1.24 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +1%",
          "title": "Model Calibration Check"
        },
        "move_is_drift": false,
        "mv_status": "pass",
        "odds_delta_pct": 0.0,
        "steam_conflicts": null,
        "steam_move_display": "+0.0%",
        "steam_team": "General Lamadrid",
        "suppress_execution": false,
        "value_split": {
          "execution_confidence": {
            "label": "Monitoring Confidence",
            "score": 36,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "market_compatibility": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 24,
            "tier": "not_reliable",
            "tier_label": "Not reliable"
          },
          "model_edge_strength": {
            "label": "Model Signal Strength",
            "score": 38,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "model_value": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 24,
            "tier": "not_reliable",
            "tier_label": "Not reliable"
          },
          "recommendation": {
            "action": "no_bet",
            "label": "No Primary Bet"
          }
        },
        "verdict": {
          "agree_note": "The market has repriced General Lamadrid, but the model still strongly favours General Lamadrid.",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": false,
            "direction_key": "conflict",
            "gap_pp": 6.1,
            "key": "conflict",
            "label": "Disagree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 6.1,
            "summary": "The market has repriced General Lamadrid, but the model still strongly favours General Lamadrid."
          },
          "authority": {
            "action": "no_bet",
            "alignment": {
              "direction_aligned": false,
              "direction_key": "conflict",
              "gap_pp": 6.1,
              "key": "conflict",
              "label": "Disagree",
              "model_strong": false,
              "pricing_aligned": true,
              "pricing_key": "moderate",
              "probability_gap_pp": 6.1,
              "summary": "The market has repriced General Lamadrid, but the model still strongly favours General Lamadrid."
            },
            "alignment_key": "conflict",
            "best_consensus_ev": 0.446,
            "best_outlier_ev": 0.446,
            "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
            "decision_strength": 3.8,
            "decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
            "decision_strength_v2": 4.8,
            "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
            "execution_confidence": 36,
            "extreme_disagreement": false,
            "final_verdict_audit": {
              "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
              "action_label": "Action",
              "decision": "No Primary Bet",
              "is_primary": false,
              "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates General Lamadrid at 38.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 31.9%.",
              "why": [
                {
                  "text": "Decision Model identifies General Lamadrid as the value side (38.0%)",
                  "tone": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                  "tone": "bad"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
                  "tone": "bad"
                }
              ],
              "why_label": "Decision Summary"
            },
            "gap_pp": 6.1,
            "gates_failed": [
              "Execution confidence below 65"
            ],
            "has_top_pick": true,
            "headline": "No Primary Bet",
            "hero_mode": "default",
            "icon": "\u25cb",
            "label": "No Primary Bet",
            "market_signal": "The market has repriced General Lamadrid, but the model still strongly favours General Lamadrid.",
            "model_conflict_detail": null,
            "model_lean": "General Lamadrid",
            "no_primary_reasons": {
              "all_triggered": [
                "market_conflict",
                "market_quality",
                "calibration_risk"
              ],
              "calibration_mode": "soft",
              "codes": [
                "market_conflict",
                "market_quality"
              ],
              "label": "Reason",
              "other_factors": [
                {
                  "code": "market_quality",
                  "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                  "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                  "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                  "tone": "warn"
                }
              ],
              "other_label": "Other factors",
              "primary": {
                "code": "market_conflict",
                "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
                "name": "Market Conflict",
                "short": "Market Conflict",
                "subtype": "probability_gap",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "secondary": {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "version": "v1"
            },
            "outlier_detected": false,
            "outlier_excluded_panel": "",
            "primary_allowed": false,
            "primary_block_explain": {
              "entries": [
                {
                  "key": "positive_ev",
                  "label": "Consensus EV +44.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                  "ok": true
                },
                {
                  "key": "gate",
                  "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
                  "ok": false
                }
              ],
              "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
              "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
              "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
              "title": "Why not Primary?"
            },
            "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +44.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
            "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +44.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.8/10 (display only)",
            "primary_gates": {
              "items": [
                {
                  "key": "extreme_gap",
                  "label": "Extreme gap",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "no"
                },
                {
                  "key": "xg_calibration",
                  "label": "xG calibration",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "warning"
                },
                {
                  "key": "reliability",
                  "label": "Rel",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "81 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "execution",
                  "label": "Exec",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "36 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "alignment",
                  "label": "Align",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "conflict"
                },
                {
                  "key": "consensus_ev",
                  "label": "ConsEV",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "+44.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "top_pick",
                  "label": "Pick",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                },
                {
                  "key": "validation",
                  "label": "Validation",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                }
              ],
              "passed": 6,
              "total": 8
            },
            "primary_type": null,
            "reasons": [
              "The market has repriced General Lamadrid, but the model still strongly favours General Lamadrid.",
              "Decision strength: 3.8/10",
              "Execution confidence below 65"
            ],
            "reliability_score": 81,
            "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
            "strength_v2_breakdown": [
              "Base decision score (v1)",
              "Reliability supports action",
              "Market steam conflicts with model",
              "Consensus-line +EV",
              "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
            ],
            "subline": "The market has repriced General Lamadrid, but the model still strongly favours General Lamadrid.",
            "thresholds": {
              "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
              "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
              "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
              "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
              "min_execution": 65,
              "min_reliability": 65,
              "min_strength": 7.0,
              "source": "db",
              "user_id": 2
            },
            "thresholds_source": "db",
            "thresholds_user_id": 2,
            "tier": "observe",
            "validation_ok": true,
            "value_context": {
              "consensus_ev": -0.0395,
              "consensus_ev_display": "-4.0%",
              "consensus_odds": 2.79,
              "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
              "disagreement_level": "moderate",
              "implied_prob": 0.3193,
              "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
              "model_prob": 0.3803,
              "raw_edge_display": "+6.1 percentage points",
              "raw_edge_pp": 6.1,
              "raw_implied_prob": 0.35842293906810035,
              "raw_signal_ev": 0.061,
              "raw_signal_ev_display": "+6.1%"
            },
            "version": "v2.5",
            "xg_calibration": {
              "block_value_alert": false,
              "calibration_status": "warning",
              "deviation_pct": 0.7,
              "reasons": [
                "Thin xG separation gap=0.12"
              ],
              "recommended_action": "monitor",
              "strength_delta": -1.0,
              "uplift_away": null,
              "uplift_home": null,
              "xg_separation": {
                "band": "low",
                "block_value_alert": false,
                "separation_score": -10,
                "strength_delta": -1.0,
                "xg_gap": 0.12
              }
            }
          },
          "headline": "No Primary Bet",
          "icon": "\u25cb",
          "label": "No Primary Bet",
          "subline": "The market has repriced General Lamadrid, but the model still strongly favours General Lamadrid.",
          "tier": "observe"
        },
        "why": {
          "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
          "bullets": [
            "Model: General Lamadrid 1.36 xG vs Leones de Rosario 1.24 \u2192 General Lamadrid 38.0%",
            "Market: Draw ~31.9% implied",
            "Market Steam: General Lamadrid +0.0%"
          ],
          "one_liner": "Model and market both lean General Lamadrid with no major conflict.",
          "title": "Why?"
        }
      },
      "edge_rows": [
        {
          "edge_pp": 6.08,
          "fair_prob": 38.01,
          "label": "General Lamadrid",
          "market_prob": 31.93,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "home"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -5.48,
          "fair_prob": 29.59,
          "label": "Draw",
          "market_prob": 35.07,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "draw"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -0.61,
          "fair_prob": 32.39,
          "label": "Leones de Rosario",
          "market_prob": 33.0,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "away"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 17.06,
          "fair_prob": 48.2,
          "label": "Over 2.5",
          "market_prob": 31.14,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "over"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -17.06,
          "fair_prob": 51.8,
          "label": "Under 2.5",
          "market_prob": 68.86,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "under"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 14.23,
          "fair_prob": 54.4,
          "label": "BTTS Yes",
          "market_prob": 40.17,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "yes"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -14.23,
          "fair_prob": 45.6,
          "label": "BTTS No",
          "market_prob": 59.83,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "no"
        }
      ],
      "edge_snapshot": {
        "edge_label": "mild_disagreement",
        "edge_pp": 6.08,
        "fair_prob_pct": 38.01,
        "hero_side": "home",
        "hero_team_name": "General Lamadrid",
        "market_prob_pct": 31.93,
        "status": "mild_value",
        "steam_team_name": "General Lamadrid"
      },
      "fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
      "fair_vs_market": {
        "closing_capture": "PRE1",
        "closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "comparison_available": true,
        "comparison_disabled": false,
        "comparison_summary": "The statistical model estimates General Lamadrid\u0027s win probability at 38.0%, compared with the closing market\u0027s implied probability of 31.9%, a difference of 6.1 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model\u0027s assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
        "degraded_note": "",
        "divergence_guard": {
          "divergence_level": "moderate",
          "edge_status": "mild_value",
          "max_gap_pp": 6.08,
          "suppress_hero": false,
          "suppress_value_language": false
        },
        "divergence_label": "Moderate model-market divergence",
        "divergence_level": "moderate",
        "divergence_level_label": "Moderate divergence",
        "divergence_note": "Fair estimate and market pricing differ modestly. Monitor before kickoff.",
        "divergence_tier": "moderate",
        "edge_label": "Mild disagreement",
        "edge_label_key": "mild_disagreement",
        "fair_confidence": "medium",
        "fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
        "fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "forecast_assessment": {
          "favourite_class": "Balanced match",
          "favourite_label": "General Lamadrid",
          "forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
          "headline": "Balanced match",
          "market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
          "market_direction": {
            "label": "Conflicts with model",
            "positive": false
          },
          "market_prob_pct": 31.9,
          "model_prob_gap_display": "+6.1 percentage points",
          "model_prob_gap_pp": 6.1,
          "model_prob_pct": 38.0,
          "outcome_separation_tier": "medium",
          "paragraphs": [],
          "pricing_convergence": {
            "gap_display": "+6.1 percentage points",
            "gap_pp": 6.1,
            "label": "Moderate",
            "label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
          },
          "reliability_headline": "High reliability",
          "reliability_icon": "\u2713",
          "reliability_score": 81,
          "reliability_tier": "high",
          "summary": "The market has repriced General Lamadrid, but the model still strongly favours General Lamadrid. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
          "tier": "balanced",
          "title": "Prediction Assessment",
          "validation_label": "Pass",
          "value_split": {
            "execution_confidence": {
              "label": "Monitoring Confidence",
              "score": 36,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "market_compatibility": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 24,
              "tier": "not_reliable",
              "tier_label": "Not reliable"
            },
            "model_edge_strength": {
              "label": "Model Signal Strength",
              "score": 38,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "model_value": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 24,
              "tier": "not_reliable",
              "tier_label": "Not reliable"
            },
            "recommendation": {
              "action": "no_bet",
              "label": "No Primary Bet"
            }
          },
          "why": {
            "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
            "bullets": [
              "Model: General Lamadrid 1.36 xG vs Leones de Rosario 1.24 \u2192 General Lamadrid 38.0%",
              "Market: Draw ~31.9% implied",
              "Market Steam: General Lamadrid +0.0%"
            ],
            "one_liner": "Model and market both lean General Lamadrid with no major conflict.",
            "title": "Why?"
          }
        },
        "forecast_certainty": {
          "note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
          "tier": "low",
          "tier_label": "Low"
        },
        "forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
        "has_market_probs": true,
        "hero_edge_pp": 6.08,
        "hero_label": "General Lamadrid",
        "hero_side": "home",
        "market_activity": "No meaningful directional movement yet.",
        "market_agreement": "moderate",
        "market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
        "market_interpretation": {
          "bullets": [
            "Monitor line movement before kickoff \u2014 not a betting recommendation."
          ],
          "follow_up": "",
          "gap_tier": "mild",
          "lead": "The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on General Lamadrid.",
          "note": "The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on General Lamadrid.",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on General Lamadrid."
          ],
          "quiet_market": true,
          "title": "Market Assessment"
        },
        "market_narrative": {
          "paragraphs": [
            "The fair estimate still sits above current market pricing on General Lamadrid.",
            "Pricing has been stable with broad sportsbook participation, suggesting settled consensus."
          ],
          "title": "Current Market Narrative"
        },
        "market_source": "closing_1x2",
        "max_gap_pp": 6.08,
        "model_validation": {
          "score_label_key": "mi_mv_pass",
          "status": "pass"
        },
        "model_validation_label": "Pass",
        "outcome_separation": {
          "breakdown": [
            "No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
            "Favourite exceeds second outcome by 5.6 pp (at 38.0%)."
          ],
          "lead_gap_pp": 5.6,
          "max_prob_pct": 38.0,
          "note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
          "tier": "medium",
          "tier_label": "Medium"
        },
        "outcome_separation_label": "Medium",
        "overall_assessment": {
          "badge_class": "moderate",
          "largest_gap_label": "General Lamadrid",
          "largest_gap_pp": 6.1,
          "lead": "The model rates General Lamadrid considerably stronger than the closing betting market.",
          "level": "moderate",
          "max_gap_pp": 6.1,
          "title": "Moderate Disagreement"
        },
        "rows": [
          {
            "difference_pp": 6.08,
            "edge_pp": 6.08,
            "fair_prob_pct": 38.01,
            "is_hero": true,
            "label": "General Lamadrid",
            "market_prob_pct": 31.93,
            "side": "home",
            "signal_key": "model_higher",
            "signal_label": "Model Higher"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": -5.48,
            "edge_pp": -5.48,
            "fair_prob_pct": 29.59,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Draw",
            "market_prob_pct": 35.07,
            "side": "draw",
            "signal_key": "market_higher",
            "signal_label": "Market Higher"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": -0.61,
            "edge_pp": -0.61,
            "fair_prob_pct": 32.39,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Leones de Rosario",
            "market_prob_pct": 33.0,
            "side": "away",
            "signal_key": "aligned",
            "signal_label": "Aligned"
          }
        ],
        "status": "mild_value",
        "status_label": "Mild Value",
        "steam_note": "The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on General Lamadrid.",
        "unavailable_note": ""
      },
      "interpretation": {
        "has_conflict": true,
        "paragraphs": [
          "The betting market strongly prefers Draw (31.9%).",
          "This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 General Lamadrid, Market \u2192 Draw, Recent sharp money \u2192 recent line movement.",
          "Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
        ],
        "show": true,
        "title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
      },
      "lifecycle": {
        "closing_implied_pct": 35.84,
        "closing_odds": 2.79,
        "closing_reason": "",
        "closing_status": "recorded",
        "closing_status_label": "Recorded",
        "clv_pending": true,
        "clv_pp": 0.0,
        "clv_reason": "",
        "clv_status": "pending",
        "context": "match",
        "current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
        "current_stage_detail": "",
        "current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
        "entry_implied_pct": 35.84,
        "entry_odds": 2.79,
        "match_phase": "upcoming",
        "match_phase_detail": "",
        "match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
        "match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
        "model_validation_label": "Pass",
        "model_validation_status": "pass",
        "stages": [
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "forecast_generated",
            "label": "Prediction Generated",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "market_detected",
            "label": "Market Compared",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "model_validated",
            "label": "Validation Passed",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "PRE1",
            "id": "closing_recorded",
            "label": "Closing Recorded",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "clv_evaluated",
            "label": "CLV Evaluated",
            "status": "pending"
          }
        ]
      },
      "market_move_intelligence": {
        "show": false
      },
      "market_overview": {
        "breadth_display": "6/8",
        "current_odds": 2.62,
        "move_display": "+0.0%",
        "open_odds": 2.62,
        "pick_team": "General Lamadrid",
        "steam_score": 22,
        "steam_team_name": "General Lamadrid",
        "steam_tier": "C"
      },
      "premium_teaser": {
        "current_divergence_pp": 6.1,
        "divergence_label": "Current divergence",
        "title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
        "unlock_items": [
          "Historical similar matches",
          "Closing odds analysis",
          "CLV tracking",
          "Sharp money signals",
          "Market efficiency rating",
          "Historical model vs market results"
        ],
        "unlock_label": "Unlock"
      },
      "show": true
    },
    "match": {
      "at2.away_team_slug": "leones-de-rosario",
      "away_expected_goals": null,
      "away_goal_display": null,
      "away_team_display_name": "Leones de Rosario",
      "away_team_id": 27282,
      "away_team_logo": null,
      "away_team_name": "Leones de Rosario",
      "away_team_public_id": "1bkIRubrksnlez",
      "away_team_slug": "leones-de-rosario",
      "country_code": "AR",
      "country_display_name": "Argentina",
      "country_flag": "/static/images/country/ar.svg",
      "country_id": 6,
      "country_name": "Argentina",
      "fixture_id": 1500190,
      "goals_away": null,
      "goals_home": null,
      "home_expected_goals": null,
      "home_goal_display": null,
      "home_team_country": "Argentina",
      "home_team_display_name": "General Lamadrid",
      "home_team_id": 1955,
      "home_team_logo": "/static/teams/1955.webp",
      "home_team_name": "General Lamadrid",
      "home_team_public_id": "3Fp10LOZhSCmew",
      "home_team_slug": "general-lamadrid",
      "ht.home_team_slug": "general-lamadrid",
      "league_country": "Argentina",
      "league_country_display": "Argentina",
      "league_display_name": "Primera C",
      "league_id": 132,
      "league_logo": "/static/leagues/132.webp",
      "league_name": "Primera C",
      "league_public_id": "5iJhpsMWwrB2VM",
      "league_season": 2026,
      "match_date": "2026-09-20 18:00:00",
      "public_id": "61Zodrubq4awVk",
      "score_fulltime_away": null,
      "score_fulltime_home": null,
      "score_penalty_away": null,
      "score_penalty_home": null,
      "status_long": "Not Started",
      "status_short": "NS",
      "venue_city": null,
      "venue_name": null
    },
    "match_decision": {
      "confidence": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
          "pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
          "pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
          "Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
          "At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
        ],
        "score": 6.0
      },
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
          "away": {
            "alpha": 0.4458,
            "best_odd": 2.7,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.0028,
            "ev": -0.1166,
            "implied_prob": 0.33,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.33,
              "draw": 0.3507,
              "home": 0.3193
            },
            "model_prob": 0.3237,
            "p_final": 0.3272
          },
          "draw": {
            "alpha": 0.413,
            "best_odd": 2.54,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.0226,
            "ev": -0.1666,
            "implied_prob": 0.3507,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.33,
              "draw": 0.3507,
              "home": 0.3193
            },
            "model_prob": 0.2959,
            "p_final": 0.3281
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "alpha": 0.4088,
            "best_odd": 2.79,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.0249,
            "ev": -0.0395,
            "implied_prob": 0.3193,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.33,
              "draw": 0.3507,
              "home": 0.3193
            },
            "model_prob": 0.3803,
            "p_final": 0.3443
          }
        },
        "1x2_outlier": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
          "away": {
            "best_odd": 2.7,
            "edge": -0.0467,
            "ev": -0.126,
            "implied_prob": 0.3704,
            "model_prob": 0.3237
          },
          "draw": {
            "best_odd": 2.54,
            "edge": -0.0978,
            "ev": -0.2483,
            "implied_prob": 0.3937,
            "model_prob": 0.2959
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "best_odd": 2.79,
            "edge": 0.0219,
            "ev": 0.0611,
            "implied_prob": 0.3584,
            "model_prob": 0.3803
          }
        },
        "btts": {
          "alpha_no": 0.1952,
          "alpha_yes": 0.142,
          "best_no_odd": 1.62,
          "best_yes_odd": 2.5,
          "btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
          "edge_no": -0.1423,
          "edge_yes": 0.1423,
          "ev_available": true,
          "ev_no": -0.2613,
          "ev_no_risk_adj": -0.1403,
          "ev_yes": 0.36,
          "ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0542,
          "implied_no": 0.5983,
          "implied_yes": 0.4017,
          "market_first": {
            "available": true,
            "mode": "market_first_btts",
            "n_bookmakers": 5,
            "no": {
              "alpha": 0.1952,
              "best_odd": 1.51,
              "edge": -0.0275,
              "ev": -0.1403,
              "implied_prob": 0.5968,
              "model_prob": 0.456,
              "p_final": 0.5693
            },
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "yes": {
              "alpha": 0.142,
              "best_odd": 2.235,
              "edge": 0.02,
              "ev": -0.0542,
              "implied_prob": 0.4032,
              "model_prob": 0.544,
              "p_final": 0.4232
            }
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 5,
          "p_final_no": 0.5693,
          "p_final_yes": 0.4232,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "reliability": "medium"
        },
        "ou25": {
          "alpha_over": 0.1337,
          "alpha_under": 0.1839,
          "best_over_odd": 3.0,
          "best_under_odd": 1.36,
          "consensus_over_odd": 2.93,
          "consensus_under_odd": 1.32,
          "edge_over": 0.1706,
          "edge_under": -0.1706,
          "ev_available": true,
          "ev_over": 0.446,
          "ev_over_risk_adj": -0.0228,
          "ev_under": -0.2955,
          "ev_under_risk_adj": -0.1316,
          "implied_over": 0.3114,
          "implied_over_mf": 0.3106,
          "implied_under": 0.6886,
          "implied_under_mf": 0.6894,
          "market_first": {
            "available": true,
            "mode": "market_first_ou",
            "n_bookmakers": 4,
            "over": {
              "alpha": 0.1337,
              "best_odd": 2.93,
              "edge": 0.0229,
              "ev": -0.0228,
              "implied_prob": 0.3106,
              "model_prob": 0.482,
              "p_final": 0.3335
            },
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "under": {
              "alpha": 0.1839,
              "best_odd": 1.32,
              "edge": -0.0315,
              "ev": -0.1316,
              "implied_prob": 0.6894,
              "model_prob": 0.518,
              "p_final": 0.6579
            }
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 4,
          "ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
          "p_final_over": 0.3335,
          "p_final_under": 0.6579,
          "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
          "reliability": "medium"
        }
      },
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "avoid",
        "code": "no_edge",
        "execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
        "insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
        "stake_mult": 0.0,
        "use_split_strip": true
      },
      "match_tier": "no_bet",
      "min_ev": 0.02,
      "total_xg": 2.6,
      "variance_flag": false
    },
    "unified_decision": {
      "actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
      "algorithm": {
        "enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
        "game_typing_module": true,
        "version": "2.5.0"
      },
      "balanced_alternative": null,
      "best_consensus_ev": 0.446,
      "best_outlier_ev": 0.446,
      "best_tracked_ev": 0.446,
      "confidence": 6.5,
      "decision_confidence_v1": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
          "pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
          "pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
          "pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Primary line identified (+1.0)",
          "Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
          "Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
          "Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
        ],
        "breakdown_v2": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "score": 3.8,
        "score_v1_legacy": 6.5,
        "score_v2_pre_penalty": 4.8,
        "strength_v2": true
      },
      "decision_strength_v2": {
        "breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "score": 3.8,
        "score_pre_penalty": 4.8
      },
      "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
      "execution": {
        "1x2_dominant": false,
        "1x2_open_contest": true,
        "grade": "A",
        "stake_factor": 1.0
      },
      "favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
        "active": false,
        "gap": null,
        "side": null
      },
      "final_action": "no_bet",
      "final_decision": {
        "action": "no_bet",
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": false,
          "direction_key": "conflict",
          "gap_pp": 6.1,
          "key": "conflict",
          "label": "Disagree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 6.1,
          "summary": "The market has repriced General Lamadrid, but the model still strongly favours General Lamadrid."
        },
        "alignment_key": "conflict",
        "best_consensus_ev": 0.446,
        "best_outlier_ev": 0.446,
        "confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
        "decision_strength": 3.8,
        "decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
        "decision_strength_v2": 4.8,
        "decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
        "execution_confidence": 36,
        "extreme_disagreement": false,
        "final_verdict_audit": {
          "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
          "action_label": "Action",
          "decision": "No Primary Bet",
          "is_primary": false,
          "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates General Lamadrid at 38.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 31.9%.",
          "why": [
            {
              "text": "Decision Model identifies General Lamadrid as the value side (38.0%)",
              "tone": "ok"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
              "tone": "bad"
            },
            {
              "text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
              "tone": "bad"
            }
          ],
          "why_label": "Decision Summary"
        },
        "gap_pp": 6.1,
        "gates_failed": [
          "Execution confidence below 65"
        ],
        "has_top_pick": true,
        "headline": "No Primary Bet",
        "hero_mode": "default",
        "icon": "\u25cb",
        "label": "No Primary Bet",
        "market_signal": "The market has repriced General Lamadrid, but the model still strongly favours General Lamadrid.",
        "model_conflict_detail": null,
        "model_lean": "General Lamadrid",
        "no_primary_reasons": {
          "all_triggered": [
            "market_conflict",
            "market_quality",
            "calibration_risk"
          ],
          "calibration_mode": "soft",
          "codes": [
            "market_conflict",
            "market_quality"
          ],
          "label": "Reason",
          "other_factors": [
            {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            }
          ],
          "other_label": "Other factors",
          "primary": {
            "code": "market_conflict",
            "detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
            "name": "Market Conflict",
            "short": "Market Conflict",
            "subtype": "probability_gap",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "secondary": {
            "code": "market_quality",
            "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
            "name": "Market Quality Risk",
            "short": "Market Quality Risk",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "version": "v1"
        },
        "outlier_detected": false,
        "outlier_excluded_panel": "",
        "primary_allowed": false,
        "primary_block_explain": {
          "entries": [
            {
              "key": "positive_ev",
              "label": "Consensus EV +44.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
              "ok": true
            },
            {
              "key": "gate",
              "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
              "ok": false
            }
          ],
          "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
          "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
          "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
          "title": "Why not Primary?"
        },
        "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +44.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
        "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +44.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.8/10 (display only)",
        "primary_gates": {
          "items": [
            {
              "key": "extreme_gap",
              "label": "Extreme gap",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "no"
            },
            {
              "key": "xg_calibration",
              "label": "xG calibration",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "warning"
            },
            {
              "key": "reliability",
              "label": "Rel",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "81 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "execution",
              "label": "Exec",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "36 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "alignment",
              "label": "Align",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "conflict"
            },
            {
              "key": "consensus_ev",
              "label": "ConsEV",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "+44.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
            },
            {
              "key": "top_pick",
              "label": "Pick",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            },
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            }
          ],
          "passed": 6,
          "total": 8
        },
        "primary_type": null,
        "reasons": [
          "The market has repriced General Lamadrid, but the model still strongly favours General Lamadrid.",
          "Decision strength: 3.8/10",
          "Execution confidence below 65"
        ],
        "reliability_score": 81,
        "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
        "strength_v2_breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market steam conflicts with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
        ],
        "subline": "The market has repriced General Lamadrid, but the model still strongly favours General Lamadrid.",
        "thresholds": {
          "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
          "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
          "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
          "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
          "min_execution": 65,
          "min_reliability": 65,
          "min_strength": 7.0,
          "source": "db",
          "user_id": 2
        },
        "thresholds_source": "db",
        "thresholds_user_id": 2,
        "tier": "observe",
        "validation_ok": true,
        "value_context": {
          "consensus_ev": -0.0395,
          "consensus_ev_display": "-4.0%",
          "consensus_odds": 2.79,
          "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
          "disagreement_level": "moderate",
          "implied_prob": 0.3193,
          "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
          "model_prob": 0.3803,
          "raw_edge_display": "+6.1 percentage points",
          "raw_edge_pp": 6.1,
          "raw_implied_prob": 0.35842293906810035,
          "raw_signal_ev": 0.061,
          "raw_signal_ev_display": "+6.1%"
        },
        "version": "v2.5",
        "xg_calibration": {
          "block_value_alert": false,
          "calibration_status": "warning",
          "deviation_pct": 0.7,
          "reasons": [
            "Thin xG separation gap=0.12"
          ],
          "recommended_action": "monitor",
          "strength_delta": -1.0,
          "uplift_away": null,
          "uplift_home": null,
          "xg_separation": {
            "band": "low",
            "block_value_alert": false,
            "separation_score": -10,
            "strength_delta": -1.0,
            "xg_gap": 0.12
          }
        }
      },
      "game_type": {
        "label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
        "scoring_type": "balanced",
        "signals": {
          "btts_yes_prob": 0.544,
          "draw_prob": 0.2959,
          "max_1x2_prob": 0.3803,
          "over_prob": 0.482,
          "total_xg": 2.6,
          "under_prob": 0.518,
          "xg_diff": 0.12
        },
        "type": "balanced",
        "typing_weights_enabled": true
      },
      "hero_display_pick": null,
      "hero_mode": "default",
      "longshot_picks": [],
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "consensus_odds": 2.79,
          "decision": "no_bet",
          "edge": 0.0249,
          "ev": -0.0395,
          "implied_prob": 0.3193,
          "max_ev_side": "home",
          "model_prob": 0.3803,
          "side": "home",
          "side_label": "General Lamadrid"
        },
        "btts": {
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "decision_layer": {
            "alpha": 0.142,
            "available": true,
            "consensus_odds": 2.235,
            "edge": 0.02,
            "market_prob": 0.4032,
            "mode": "market_first_btts",
            "model_prob": 0.544,
            "n_bookmakers": 5,
            "no": {
              "alpha": 0.1952,
              "best_odd": 1.51,
              "edge": -0.0275,
              "ev": -0.1403,
              "implied_prob": 0.5968,
              "model_prob": 0.456,
              "p_final": 0.5693
            },
            "p_final": 0.4232,
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "risk_adj_ev": -0.0542,
            "value_side": "yes",
            "yes": {
              "alpha": 0.142,
              "best_odd": 2.235,
              "edge": 0.02,
              "ev": -0.0542,
              "implied_prob": 0.4032,
              "model_prob": 0.544,
              "p_final": 0.4232
            }
          },
          "edge": 0.1423,
          "ev": 0.36,
          "implied_prob": 0.4017,
          "model_prob": 0.544,
          "side": "yes",
          "value_side": "yes"
        },
        "ou_2_5": {
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "decision_layer": {
            "alpha": 0.1337,
            "available": true,
            "consensus_odds": 2.93,
            "edge": 0.0229,
            "market_prob": 0.3106,
            "mode": "market_first_ou",
            "model_prob": 0.482,
            "n_bookmakers": 4,
            "over": {
              "alpha": 0.1337,
              "best_odd": 2.93,
              "edge": 0.0229,
              "ev": -0.0228,
              "implied_prob": 0.3106,
              "model_prob": 0.482,
              "p_final": 0.3335
            },
            "p_final": 0.3335,
            "prediction_confidence": "very_low",
            "risk_adj_ev": -0.0228,
            "under": {
              "alpha": 0.1839,
              "best_odd": 1.32,
              "edge": -0.0315,
              "ev": -0.1316,
              "implied_prob": 0.6894,
              "model_prob": 0.518,
              "p_final": 0.6579
            },
            "value_side": "over"
          },
          "edge": 0.1706,
          "ev": 0.446,
          "implied_prob": 0.3114,
          "model_prob": 0.482,
          "side": "over",
          "value_side": "over"
        }
      },
      "match_id": 1500190,
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "bet",
        "actionable": true,
        "clear_edge": true,
        "code": "clear_edge",
        "execution_line_key": null,
        "insight_line_key": null,
        "max_valid_ev": 0.446,
        "min_ev": 0.02,
        "stake_mult": 1.0,
        "use_split_strip": false
      },
      "match_tier": "value_game",
      "no_clear_primary": false,
      "probabilities": {
        "away": 0.3237,
        "draw": 0.2959,
        "home": 0.3803
      },
      "reason_codes": [
        "no_ev_1x2"
      ],
      "secondary_pick": {
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "ev": 0.446,
        "implied_prob": 0.3114,
        "market": "ou_2_5",
        "model_prob": 0.482,
        "not_dominant": true,
        "risk_band": "medium",
        "risk_tier": "secondary",
        "side": "over",
        "slot": "secondary"
      },
      "secondary_picks": [
        {
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "ev": 0.446,
          "implied_prob": 0.3114,
          "market": "ou_2_5",
          "model_prob": 0.482,
          "not_dominant": true,
          "risk_band": "medium",
          "risk_tier": "secondary",
          "side": "over",
          "slot": "secondary"
        }
      ],
      "show_betting_primary_label": false,
      "suppressed_primary": null,
      "teams": {
        "away": "Leones de Rosario",
        "home": "General Lamadrid"
      },
      "top_pick": {
        "composite_score": 0.19584,
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "ev": 0.36,
        "implied_prob": 0.4017,
        "market": "btts",
        "model_prob": 0.544,
        "not_dominant": false,
        "primary_strength": "clear",
        "risk_band": "strong",
        "risk_tier": "primary",
        "side": "yes",
        "slot": "primary",
        "speculative_primary": false
      },
      "valid_markets_count": 2,
      "value_context_1x2": {
        "consensus_ev": -0.0395,
        "consensus_ev_display": "-4.0%",
        "consensus_odds": 2.79,
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "implied_prob": 0.3193,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "model_prob": 0.3803,
        "raw_edge_display": "+6.1 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 6.1,
        "raw_implied_prob": 0.35842293906810035,
        "raw_signal_ev": 0.061,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+6.1%"
      }
    }
  },
  "fixture_id": 1500190,
  "generated_at_utc": "2026-09-20T17:59:59.886657+00:00",
  "lang_id": "en"
}

Dapatkan Ramalan Premium untuk General Lamadrid & Leones de Rosario!

Buka analisis mendalam, tip pertaruhan eksklusif, dan ramalan perlawanan dengan perkhidmatan langganan premium kami.

Langgan Sekarang
Kembali ke Statistik
Primera C Primera C — Kedudukan
# PASUKAN P M S K Mata
1 Berazategui 31 12 12 7 48
2 Sacachispas 31 13 8 10 47
3 Lugano 31 11 13 7 46
4 Juventud Unida 31 12 9 10 45
5 Estrella Del Sur 31 11 12 8 45
6 Centro Español 30 11 11 8 44
7 Mercedes 31 11 11 9 44
8 Victoriano Arenas 31 10 14 7 44
9 Puerto Nuevo 31 9 11 11 38
10 Defensores de Cambaceres 31 9 9 13 36
11 JJ Urquiza 31 6 14 11 32
12 Deportivo Paraguayo 31 7 11 13 32
13 Leandro N. Alem 30 8 7 15 31
14 Argentino Rosario 31 4 15 12 27
# PASUKAN P J B +/- Mata
1 Juventud Unida 31 38 31 +7 45
2 Berazategui 31 37 24 +13 48
3 Centro Español 30 37 27 +10 44
4 Lugano 31 35 28 +7 46
5 Sacachispas 31 32 26 +6 47
6 Estrella Del Sur 31 31 29 +2 45
7 Mercedes 31 30 24 +6 44
8 Argentino Rosario 31 30 41 -11 27
9 Leandro N. Alem 30 29 51 -22 31
10 Puerto Nuevo 31 28 35 -7 38
11 Defensores de Cambaceres 31 25 31 -6 36
12 Victoriano Arenas 31 24 19 +5 44
13 Deportivo Paraguayo 31 23 39 -16 32
14 JJ Urquiza 31 19 26 -7 32