Statistik / Bola Sepak / Argentina. Liga Profesional Argentina / Central Córdoba de Santiago vs Instituto Córdoba

Central Córdoba de Santiago vs Instituto Córdoba Statistics & Analysis

Aug 16, 2026 - 23:15
0 0.73
1 1.55
xG Accuracy: 70%
Laman pertaruhan premium stake: pengguna baharu boleh guna kod promo FHn2uDc1. Daftar sekarang

Pasaran yang dijejaki vs hasil sepenuh masa

Setiap baris membandingkan model pra-perlawanan lean dengan keputusan sepenuh masa.

  • Pasaran Ramalan Hasilnya Hasil
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 matlamat) ✔ Betul
  • Kedua-dua Pasukan Menjaringkan Gol BTTS Tidak Tidak ✔ Betul
  • 1X2 Instituto Córdoba Instituto Córdoba ✔ Betul
  • Cerapan skor tepat 0-1, 0-2, 1-1, 0-0, 1-2 0-1 ✔ Betul

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 11, 2026 · 07:00 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-3646372

Closing Odds 2.23
AI Fair Odds —
CLV +0.0%
Final Result Instituto Córdoba win · Central Córdoba de Santiago 0–1 Instituto Córdoba
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade A

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Intelijen pasaran

Bacaan selepas pilihan utama: bagaimana suapan penutup berprioriti bergerak berbanding model.

Ringkasan pasaran

Pasaran kekal stabil menjelang sepakan. Tiada anjakan implied ketara antara PRE30 dan PRE1 pada snapshot berprioriti.

Walaupun pergerakan lewat kecil, model masih menilai Instituto Córdoba (1X2),Lebih 2.5 gol jauh melebihi implied snapshot penutupan — bacaan statik "model vs harga", bukan kejaran steam.

Model masih melebihi implied penutupan pada Instituto Córdoba (1X2) kira-kira 12.2 mata peratus — isyarat salah harga paling jelas pada halaman ini.

Model vs implied penutup

Pasaran Model % Implied penutup % Jurang (pp)
Central Córdoba de Santiago (1X2) 16.0 24.7 -8.6
Lukis (1X2) 28.5 32.0 -3.5
Instituto Córdoba (1X2) 55.5 43.3 +12.2
Lebih 2.5 gol 39.9 34.4 +5.5
Bawah 2.5 gol 60.1 65.6 -5.5
Apa maksudnya

Secara ringkas: model kira-kira 55.5% pada Instituto Córdoba (1X2), manakala snapshot penutup menunjukkan kira-kira 43.3%. Bezanya — kira-kira 12.2 mata peratus — ialah jurang model-vs-pasaran terbesar yang ditonjolkan di halaman ini.

Ringkas: "implied penutup" ialah kebarangkalian terbit daripada odds akhir yang ditangkap (selepas de-vig ringkas). "Jurang (pp)" = peratus model tolak implied tersebut, dalam mata peratus (pp).

Pergerakan garisan menjelang sepakan mula

Satu buku prioriti setiap snapshot (bukan semua). Laluan tangkapan: PRE30 → PRE1 · Buku: Pinnacle

Dalam kurungan pada lajur: Penutup = snapshot pertama tersedia ikut PRE1→PRE5→PRE10→PRE30; Awal = pertama dalam PRE30→PRE10→PRE5 yang berbeza daripada Penutup.

Odds terperinci dilipat di bawah — pergerakan implied (de-vig) boleh diabaikan.

Lihat jadual penuh baris demi baris
Pasaran Awal (PRE30) Penutup (PRE1) Δ tersirat (pp)
Central Córdoba de Santiago (1X2) 3.92 3.92 0.0
Lukis (1X2) 3.02 3.02 0.0
Instituto Córdoba (1X2) 2.23 2.23 0.0
Lebih 2.5 gol 2.8 2.8 0.0
Bawah 2.5 gol 1.47 1.47 0.0

Taklimat AI untuk perlawanan ini belum tersedia. Selepas naik taraf pelayan, jalankan semula “Batch generate odds” untuk menjana ringkasan.

View technical JSON
{
  "bundle_version": 1,
  "content_hash": "20ed639315bdfc7ade4bae4250ddbef8af7aa917ad4959629a259c381356482c",
  "decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
  "facts": {
    "ai_fp": {
      "away_predicted_xg": 1.55,
      "away_win_prob": 0.5545,
      "away_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "bayes_applied": 0,
      "btts_no_prob": 0.577,
      "btts_yes_prob": 0.423,
      "dc_rho": -0.13,
      "draw_prob": 0.2853,
      "draw_prob_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_away": 1.8,
      "fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_draw": 3.51,
      "fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
      "fair_odds_home": 6.24,
      "fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
      "home_predicted_xg": 0.73,
      "home_win_prob": 0.1602,
      "home_win_prob_posterior": null,
      "over_25_prob": 0.399,
      "prediction_confidence": "high",
      "under_25_prob": 0.601
    },
    "api_prediction": {
      "advice": "Combo Double chance : draw or Instituto C\u00f3rdoba and -3.5 goals",
      "main_pick_display": "Winner : Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
      "percent_away": "45%",
      "percent_draw": "45%",
      "percent_home": "10%",
      "winner_name": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba"
    },
    "away_xg": 1.55,
    "betting_insight": {
      "bet_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
      "confidence": 55.5,
      "main_pick_meta": {
        "confidence": "high",
        "display_text": "Winner : Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
        "edge": 0.1218,
        "edge_gap": 0.2705,
        "market": "1X2",
        "market_prob": 0.4334,
        "model_prob": 0.5552,
        "pick_type": "winner",
        "probabilities": {
          "away": 55.5,
          "draw": 28.5,
          "home": 16.0
        },
        "reason": "",
        "selection": "away",
        "selection_name": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba"
      },
      "market_comparison": [
        {
          "affi_link": "",
          "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
          "odd": 2.23
        }
      ],
      "risk_color": "#f44336",
      "risk_key": "high_risk",
      "stacked_market": null,
      "value_bet": {
        "best_odds": 2.23,
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "display_market": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba Win",
        "is_value": true,
        "label": "Away",
        "market_fair_odds": 2.31,
        "market_odds": 2.23,
        "model_odds": 1.8,
        "overround": 3.5,
        "prob_edge": 10.7,
        "value_pct": 23.9,
        "value_rating": "strong_value"
      }
    },
    "betting_markets": {
      "btts": {
        "away_clean_sheet": 6,
        "away_failed_to_score": 6,
        "away_played": 20,
        "away_score_rate": 78.8,
        "home_clean_sheet": 7,
        "home_failed_to_score": 11,
        "home_played": 19,
        "home_score_rate": 51.8,
        "no_prob": 57.7,
        "pick": "No",
        "pick_prob": 57.7,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": false,
        "yes_prob": 42.3
      },
      "correct_score": {
        "away_expected": 1.55,
        "home_expected": 0.73,
        "scores": [
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 0,
            "label": "0-1",
            "prob": 15.9
          },
          {
            "away": 2,
            "home": 0,
            "label": "0-2",
            "prob": 12.3
          },
          {
            "away": 1,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-1",
            "prob": 11.6
          },
          {
            "away": 0,
            "home": 0,
            "label": "0-0",
            "prob": 10.2
          },
          {
            "away": 2,
            "home": 1,
            "label": "1-2",
            "prob": 9.0
          }
        ],
        "source": "xG"
      },
      "double_chance": {
        "options": [
          {
            "key": "1X",
            "label": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago or Draw",
            "prob": 44.5
          },
          {
            "key": "12",
            "label": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago or Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
            "prob": 71.5
          },
          {
            "key": "X2",
            "label": "Draw or Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
            "prob": 84.0
          }
        ],
        "pick_key": "X2",
        "pick_label": "Draw or Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
        "pick_prob": 84.0
      },
      "match_winner": {
        "away_pct": 55.5,
        "draw_pct": 28.5,
        "home_pct": 16.0,
        "lean_key": "away",
        "lean_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba"
      },
      "over_under": {
        "api_hint": "-3.5",
        "avg_total": 2.28,
        "away_avg_scored": 1.1,
        "confidence": "medium",
        "home_avg_scored": 0.6,
        "over_prob": 39.9,
        "pick": "Under 2.5",
        "pick_prob": 60.1,
        "source": "xG_dc",
        "strong_pick": false,
        "total_expected": 2.28,
        "under_prob": 60.1
      },
      "prob_source": "poisson",
      "value_bet_enhanced": {
        "bookmaker_id": 0,
        "bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
        "edge": 23.9,
        "implied_prob": 44.8,
        "is_value": true,
        "label": "Away",
        "market": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba Win",
        "model_prob": 55.6,
        "odds": 2.23
      }
    },
    "closing_line_bundle": {
      "away_team": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
      "closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
        "away": 43.34,
        "draw": 32.0,
        "home": 24.66
      },
      "closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "closing_capture": "PRE1",
      "closing_fetched_at": "2026-08-16 23:14:02",
      "early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "early_capture": "PRE30",
      "early_fetched_at": "2026-08-16 22:44:02",
      "has_data": true,
      "home_team": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
      "largest_move_kind": null,
      "max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
      "model_vs_closing": [
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 24.66,
          "gap_pp": -8.64,
          "kind": "1x2_h",
          "model_pct": 16.01
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 32.0,
          "gap_pp": -3.53,
          "kind": "1x2_d",
          "model_pct": 28.47
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 43.34,
          "gap_pp": 12.18,
          "kind": "1x2_a",
          "model_pct": 55.52
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 34.43,
          "gap_pp": 5.47,
          "kind": "ou_o",
          "model_pct": 39.9
        },
        {
          "closing_implied_pct": 65.57,
          "gap_pp": -5.47,
          "kind": "ou_u",
          "model_pct": 60.1
        }
      ],
      "movement": [
        {
          "closing": 3.92,
          "early": 3.92,
          "implied_closing_pct": 24.66,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 24.66,
          "kind": "1x2_h"
        },
        {
          "closing": 3.02,
          "early": 3.02,
          "implied_closing_pct": 32.0,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 32.0,
          "kind": "1x2_d"
        },
        {
          "closing": 2.23,
          "early": 2.23,
          "implied_closing_pct": 43.34,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 43.34,
          "kind": "1x2_a"
        },
        {
          "closing": 2.8,
          "early": 2.8,
          "implied_closing_pct": 34.43,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 34.43,
          "kind": "ou_o"
        },
        {
          "closing": 1.47,
          "early": 1.47,
          "implied_closing_pct": 65.57,
          "implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
          "implied_early_pct": 65.57,
          "kind": "ou_u"
        }
      ],
      "movement_negligible": true,
      "same_bookmaker": true,
      "top_value_gap": {
        "gap_pp": 12.2,
        "kind": "1x2_a"
      }
    },
    "correct_score_insight": {
      "best_value": null,
      "lean_card": {
        "diff_pp": -1.6,
        "ev": -0.0937,
        "has_edge": false,
        "label": "0-1",
        "market_odds": 5.7,
        "market_prob": 0.1754,
        "market_prob_pct": 17.5,
        "model_prob": 0.159,
        "model_prob_pct": 15.9,
        "n_bookmakers": 10,
        "status_key": "no_value"
      },
      "most_likely": {
        "label": "0-1",
        "prob": 15.9
      },
      "top5": [
        {
          "label": "0-1",
          "prob": 15.9
        },
        {
          "label": "0-2",
          "prob": 12.3
        },
        {
          "label": "1-1",
          "prob": 11.6
        },
        {
          "label": "0-0",
          "prob": 10.2
        },
        {
          "label": "1-2",
          "prob": 9.0
        }
      ]
    },
    "home_xg": 0.73,
    "homepage_pick": {
      "best_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
      "best_odds": 2.23,
      "confidence": "moderate",
      "display_label": "Away Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
      "edge": 10.7,
      "ev": 23.9,
      "probability": 55.5
    },
    "market_cards": [
      {
        "authority_action": "lean",
        "authority_note": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
        "consensus_odds": 2.23,
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "ev": 0.0664,
        "ev_available": true,
        "ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 6.6,
          "text": "+6.6%"
        },
        "featured": true,
        "id": "1x2",
        "implied_prob": 0.4334,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "max_ev": 0.0664,
        "max_ev_display": {
          "capped": false,
          "raw_pct": 6.6,
          "text": "+6.6%"
        },
        "model_prob": 0.5552,
        "raw_edge_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 12.2,
        "raw_signal_ev": 0.2381,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+23.8%",
        "show_primary_label": false,
        "side_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
        "sort_key": 10209.76,
        "tier": "best"
      },
      {
        "decision": "lean",
        "decision_layer": {
          "available": false
        },
        "ev_available": false,
        "ev_over": null,
        "ev_over_display": null,
        "ev_under": null,
        "ev_under_display": null,
        "featured": false,
        "id": "ou_2_5",
        "max_ev": null,
        "n_bookmakers": 0,
        "over_prob": 39.9,
        "sort_key": 4050.0,
        "tier": "lean",
        "under_prob": 60.1,
        "value_side": "under"
      },
      {
        "decision": "lean",
        "decision_layer": {
          "available": false
        },
        "ev_available": false,
        "ev_no": null,
        "ev_no_display": null,
        "ev_yes": null,
        "ev_yes_display": null,
        "featured": false,
        "id": "btts",
        "max_ev": null,
        "n_bookmakers": 0,
        "no_prob": 57.7,
        "sort_key": 4050.0,
        "tier": "lean",
        "value_side": "no",
        "yes_prob": 42.3
      },
      {
        "featured": false,
        "id": "correct_score",
        "sort_key": 827.7,
        "tier": "risk",
        "top_label": "0-1",
        "top_prob": 15.9
      }
    ],
    "market_intelligence": {
      "betting_signal": {
        "alert_breadth": "10/13",
        "alert_breadth_note": "10/13 sportsbooks confirmed",
        "alert_move": "\u2191 +14.7%",
        "alert_team": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
        "alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
        "divergence_pp": 12.2,
        "has_alert": true,
        "hero_edge_pp": 12.11,
        "hero_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
        "market_prob_pct": 43.3,
        "market_team": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
        "model_prob_pct": 55.5,
        "model_team": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
        "show": true,
        "status_icon": "!",
        "status_key": "caution",
        "status_label": "Use caution",
        "status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
        "steam_score": 43,
        "steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
        "steam_tier": "B",
        "title": "Betting Signal"
      },
      "decision_chain": {
        "academy_links": [
          {
            "key": "market_disagree",
            "read_min": 5,
            "title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
            "url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "steam",
            "read_min": 4,
            "title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
            "url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
          },
          {
            "key": "clv_pending",
            "read_min": 3,
            "title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
            "url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
          }
        ],
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": true,
          "direction_key": "agree",
          "gap_pp": 12.2,
          "key": "agree",
          "label": "Agree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 12.2,
          "summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba)."
        },
        "authority": {
          "action": "lean",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": true,
            "direction_key": "agree",
            "gap_pp": 12.2,
            "key": "agree",
            "label": "Agree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 12.2,
            "summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba)."
          },
          "alignment_key": "agree",
          "best_consensus_ev": 0.0664,
          "best_outlier_ev": 0.238,
          "confidence_band": "Moderate",
          "decision_strength": 6.8,
          "decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
          "decision_strength_v2": 6.3,
          "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
          "execution_confidence": 54,
          "extreme_disagreement": false,
          "final_verdict_audit": {
            "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
            "action_label": "Action",
            "decision": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
            "is_primary": false,
            "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Instituto C\u00f3rdoba at 55.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 43.3%.",
            "why": [
              {
                "text": "Decision Model identifies Instituto C\u00f3rdoba as the value side (55.5%)",
                "tone": "ok"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
                "tone": "ok"
              },
              {
                "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                "tone": "bad"
              }
            ],
            "why_label": "Decision Summary"
          },
          "gap_pp": 12.2,
          "gates_failed": [
            "Execution confidence below 65"
          ],
          "has_top_pick": true,
          "headline": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
          "hero_mode": "default",
          "icon": "\u2192",
          "label": "Lean only \u2014 not a default Primary",
          "market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
          "model_conflict_detail": null,
          "model_lean": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
          "no_primary_reasons": {
            "all_triggered": [
              "market_quality"
            ],
            "calibration_mode": null,
            "codes": [
              "market_quality"
            ],
            "label": "Reason",
            "other_factors": [],
            "other_label": "Other factors",
            "primary": {
              "code": "market_quality",
              "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
              "name": "Market Quality Risk",
              "short": "Market Quality Risk",
              "tone": "warn"
            },
            "secondary": null,
            "version": "v1"
          },
          "outlier_detected": true,
          "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Instituto C\u00f3rdoba \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.23 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +24% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1493065 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.23 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +6.6% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
          "primary_allowed": false,
          "primary_block_explain": {
            "entries": [
              {
                "key": "positive_ev",
                "label": "Consensus EV +6.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                "ok": true
              },
              {
                "key": "gate",
                "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
                "ok": false
              }
            ],
            "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
            "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
            "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
            "title": "Why not Primary?"
          },
          "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +6.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 6.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
          "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +6.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 6.8/10 (display only)",
          "primary_gates": {
            "items": [
              {
                "key": "extreme_gap",
                "label": "Extreme gap",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "no"
              },
              {
                "key": "xg_calibration",
                "label": "xG calibration",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "ok"
              },
              {
                "key": "reliability",
                "label": "Rel",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "68 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "execution",
                "label": "Exec",
                "ok": false,
                "value": "54 (\u226565)"
              },
              {
                "key": "alignment",
                "label": "Align",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "agree"
              },
              {
                "key": "consensus_ev",
                "label": "ConsEV",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "+6.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
              },
              {
                "key": "top_pick",
                "label": "Pick",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              },
              {
                "key": "validation",
                "label": "Validation",
                "ok": true,
                "value": "true"
              }
            ],
            "passed": 7,
            "total": 8
          },
          "primary_type": null,
          "reasons": [
            "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba).",
            "Decision strength: 6.8/10",
            "Execution confidence below 65",
            "Outlier price +24% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
          ],
          "reliability_score": 68,
          "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
          "strength_v2_breakdown": [
            "Base decision score (v1)",
            "Reliability supports action",
            "Market aligns with model",
            "Consensus-line +EV",
            "Clear xG separation"
          ],
          "subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
          "thresholds": {
            "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
            "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
            "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
            "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
            "min_execution": 65,
            "min_reliability": 65,
            "min_strength": 7.0,
            "source": "db",
            "user_id": 2
          },
          "thresholds_source": "db",
          "thresholds_user_id": 2,
          "tier": "lean",
          "validation_ok": true,
          "value_context": {
            "consensus_ev": 0.0664,
            "consensus_ev_display": "+6.6%",
            "consensus_odds": 2.23,
            "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
            "disagreement_level": "moderate",
            "implied_prob": 0.4334,
            "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
            "model_prob": 0.5552,
            "raw_edge_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
            "raw_edge_pp": 12.2,
            "raw_implied_prob": 0.4484304932735426,
            "raw_signal_ev": 0.2381,
            "raw_signal_ev_display": "+23.8%"
          },
          "version": "v2.5",
          "xg_calibration": {
            "block_value_alert": false,
            "calibration_status": "ok",
            "deviation_pct": 14.8,
            "reasons": [
              "Clear xG separation gap=0.82"
            ],
            "recommended_action": "ok",
            "strength_delta": 0.5,
            "uplift_away": null,
            "uplift_home": null,
            "xg_separation": {
              "band": "clear",
              "block_value_alert": false,
              "separation_score": 5,
              "strength_delta": 0.5,
              "xg_gap": 0.82
            }
          }
        },
        "bet_status": "lean",
        "books_breadth_display": "10/13",
        "breadth_ratio": 0.7692307692307693,
        "evidence": {
          "score": 86,
          "signals": [
            {
              "icon": "\u2713",
              "key": "statistical_edge",
              "label": "Statistical edge detected",
              "status": "pass"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "market_agreement",
              "label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
              "status": "caution"
            },
            {
              "icon": "\u2713",
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Market drift supports model side (direction only \u2014 not pricing convergence)",
              "status": "pass"
            },
            {
              "icon": "!",
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation warning",
              "status": "caution"
            }
          ],
          "stars": 4,
          "tier": "high",
          "tier_label": "High"
        },
        "forecast_reliability": {
          "breakdown": [
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation: Warning",
              "tone": "caution"
            },
            {
              "key": "gap",
              "label": "Large market gap (12 pp)",
              "tone": "caution"
            },
            {
              "key": "steam",
              "label": "Market drift aligns with model",
              "tone": "ok"
            }
          ],
          "parts": {
            "alignment": 18.9,
            "data_quality": 12.0,
            "market_coverage": 7.7,
            "steam_coherence": 10.0,
            "validation": 14.0
          },
          "score": 68,
          "stars": 3,
          "tier": "moderate",
          "tier_label": "Moderate"
        },
        "lean_gap_pp": 12.11,
        "market_agreement": "weak",
        "max_gap_pp": 12.11,
        "model_calibration": {
          "away_xg": 1.55,
          "calibration_status": "ok",
          "deviation_pct": 15.0,
          "elevated": false,
          "home_xg": 0.73,
          "impact_note": "",
          "league_avg_xg": 1.35,
          "peak_xg": 1.55,
          "status_label": "Within typical league range",
          "summary": "Home xG 0.73 \u00b7 Away xG 1.55 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +15%",
          "title": "Model Calibration Check"
        },
        "move_is_drift": true,
        "mv_status": "warning",
        "odds_delta_pct": 14.7,
        "steam_conflicts": false,
        "steam_move_display": "\u2191 +14.7%",
        "steam_team": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
        "suppress_execution": false,
        "value_split": {
          "execution_confidence": {
            "label": "Betting Confidence",
            "score": 54,
            "tier": "moderate",
            "tier_label": "Moderate"
          },
          "market_compatibility": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 39,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "model_edge_strength": {
            "label": "Model Signal Strength",
            "score": 55,
            "tier": "moderate",
            "tier_label": "Moderate"
          },
          "model_value": {
            "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
            "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
            "score": 39,
            "tier": "low",
            "tier_label": "Low"
          },
          "recommendation": {
            "action": "lean",
            "label": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet"
          }
        },
        "verdict": {
          "agree_note": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
          "alignment": {
            "direction_aligned": true,
            "direction_key": "agree",
            "gap_pp": 12.2,
            "key": "agree",
            "label": "Agree",
            "model_strong": false,
            "pricing_aligned": true,
            "pricing_key": "moderate",
            "probability_gap_pp": 12.2,
            "summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba)."
          },
          "authority": {
            "action": "lean",
            "alignment": {
              "direction_aligned": true,
              "direction_key": "agree",
              "gap_pp": 12.2,
              "key": "agree",
              "label": "Agree",
              "model_strong": false,
              "pricing_aligned": true,
              "pricing_key": "moderate",
              "probability_gap_pp": 12.2,
              "summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba)."
            },
            "alignment_key": "agree",
            "best_consensus_ev": 0.0664,
            "best_outlier_ev": 0.238,
            "confidence_band": "Moderate",
            "decision_strength": 6.8,
            "decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
            "decision_strength_v2": 6.3,
            "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
            "execution_confidence": 54,
            "extreme_disagreement": false,
            "final_verdict_audit": {
              "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
              "action_label": "Action",
              "decision": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
              "is_primary": false,
              "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Instituto C\u00f3rdoba at 55.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 43.3%.",
              "why": [
                {
                  "text": "Decision Model identifies Instituto C\u00f3rdoba as the value side (55.5%)",
                  "tone": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
                  "tone": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
                  "tone": "bad"
                }
              ],
              "why_label": "Decision Summary"
            },
            "gap_pp": 12.2,
            "gates_failed": [
              "Execution confidence below 65"
            ],
            "has_top_pick": true,
            "headline": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
            "hero_mode": "default",
            "icon": "\u2192",
            "label": "Lean only \u2014 not a default Primary",
            "market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
            "model_conflict_detail": null,
            "model_lean": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
            "no_primary_reasons": {
              "all_triggered": [
                "market_quality"
              ],
              "calibration_mode": null,
              "codes": [
                "market_quality"
              ],
              "label": "Reason",
              "other_factors": [],
              "other_label": "Other factors",
              "primary": {
                "code": "market_quality",
                "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
                "name": "Market Quality Risk",
                "short": "Market Quality Risk",
                "tone": "warn"
              },
              "secondary": null,
              "version": "v1"
            },
            "outlier_detected": true,
            "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Instituto C\u00f3rdoba \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.23 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +24% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1493065 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.23 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +6.6% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
            "primary_allowed": false,
            "primary_block_explain": {
              "entries": [
                {
                  "key": "positive_ev",
                  "label": "Consensus EV +6.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
                  "ok": true
                },
                {
                  "key": "gate",
                  "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
                  "ok": false
                }
              ],
              "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
              "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
              "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
              "title": "Why not Primary?"
            },
            "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +6.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 6.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
            "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +6.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 6.8/10 (display only)",
            "primary_gates": {
              "items": [
                {
                  "key": "extreme_gap",
                  "label": "Extreme gap",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "no"
                },
                {
                  "key": "xg_calibration",
                  "label": "xG calibration",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "ok"
                },
                {
                  "key": "reliability",
                  "label": "Rel",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "68 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "execution",
                  "label": "Exec",
                  "ok": false,
                  "value": "54 (\u226565)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "alignment",
                  "label": "Align",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "agree"
                },
                {
                  "key": "consensus_ev",
                  "label": "ConsEV",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "+6.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
                },
                {
                  "key": "top_pick",
                  "label": "Pick",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                },
                {
                  "key": "validation",
                  "label": "Validation",
                  "ok": true,
                  "value": "true"
                }
              ],
              "passed": 7,
              "total": 8
            },
            "primary_type": null,
            "reasons": [
              "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba).",
              "Decision strength: 6.8/10",
              "Execution confidence below 65",
              "Outlier price +24% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
            ],
            "reliability_score": 68,
            "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
            "strength_v2_breakdown": [
              "Base decision score (v1)",
              "Reliability supports action",
              "Market aligns with model",
              "Consensus-line +EV",
              "Clear xG separation"
            ],
            "subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
            "thresholds": {
              "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
              "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
              "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
              "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
              "min_execution": 65,
              "min_reliability": 65,
              "min_strength": 7.0,
              "source": "db",
              "user_id": 2
            },
            "thresholds_source": "db",
            "thresholds_user_id": 2,
            "tier": "lean",
            "validation_ok": true,
            "value_context": {
              "consensus_ev": 0.0664,
              "consensus_ev_display": "+6.6%",
              "consensus_odds": 2.23,
              "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
              "disagreement_level": "moderate",
              "implied_prob": 0.4334,
              "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
              "model_prob": 0.5552,
              "raw_edge_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
              "raw_edge_pp": 12.2,
              "raw_implied_prob": 0.4484304932735426,
              "raw_signal_ev": 0.2381,
              "raw_signal_ev_display": "+23.8%"
            },
            "version": "v2.5",
            "xg_calibration": {
              "block_value_alert": false,
              "calibration_status": "ok",
              "deviation_pct": 14.8,
              "reasons": [
                "Clear xG separation gap=0.82"
              ],
              "recommended_action": "ok",
              "strength_delta": 0.5,
              "uplift_away": null,
              "uplift_home": null,
              "xg_separation": {
                "band": "clear",
                "block_value_alert": false,
                "separation_score": 5,
                "strength_delta": 0.5,
                "xg_gap": 0.82
              }
            }
          },
          "headline": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
          "icon": "\u2192",
          "label": "Lean only \u2014 not a default Primary",
          "subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
          "tier": "lean"
        },
        "why": {
          "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
          "bullets": [
            "Model: Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago 0.73 xG vs Instituto C\u00f3rdoba 1.55 \u2192 Instituto C\u00f3rdoba 55.5%",
            "Market: Instituto C\u00f3rdoba ~43.3% implied",
            "Market Drift: Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago odds \u2191 +14.7%"
          ],
          "one_liner": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba projects stronger on expected goals (+0.82 xG edge).",
          "title": "Why?"
        }
      },
      "edge_rows": [
        {
          "edge_pp": -8.64,
          "fair_prob": 16.02,
          "label": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
          "market_prob": 24.66,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "home"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": -3.47,
          "fair_prob": 28.53,
          "label": "Draw",
          "market_prob": 32.0,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "draw"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": 12.11,
          "fair_prob": 55.45,
          "label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
          "market_prob": 43.34,
          "market_type": "1x2",
          "outcome": "away"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 39.9,
          "label": "Over 2.5",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "over"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 60.1,
          "label": "Under 2.5",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "ou25",
          "outcome": "under"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 42.3,
          "label": "BTTS Yes",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "yes"
        },
        {
          "edge_pp": null,
          "fair_prob": 57.7,
          "label": "BTTS No",
          "market_prob": null,
          "market_type": "btts",
          "outcome": "no"
        }
      ],
      "edge_snapshot": {
        "edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
        "edge_pp": 12.11,
        "fair_prob_pct": 55.45,
        "hero_side": "away",
        "hero_team_name": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
        "market_prob_pct": 43.34,
        "status": "strong_disagreement",
        "steam_team_name": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago"
      },
      "fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
      "fair_vs_market": {
        "closing_capture": "PRE1",
        "closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "comparison_available": true,
        "comparison_disabled": false,
        "comparison_summary": "The statistical model estimates Instituto C\u00f3rdoba\u0027s win probability at 55.5%, compared with the closing market\u0027s implied probability of 43.3%, a difference of 12.1 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model\u0027s assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
        "degraded_note": "",
        "divergence_guard": {
          "divergence_level": "strong",
          "edge_status": "strong_disagreement",
          "max_gap_pp": 12.11,
          "suppress_hero": false,
          "suppress_value_language": false
        },
        "divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
        "divergence_level": "strong",
        "divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
        "divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
        "divergence_tier": "strong",
        "edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
        "edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
        "fair_confidence": "medium",
        "fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
        "fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
        "forecast_assessment": {
          "favourite_class": "Slight favourite",
          "favourite_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
          "forecast_certainty_tier": "high",
          "headline": "Slight edge match",
          "market_agreement_label": "Weak",
          "market_direction": {
            "label": "Supports model direction",
            "positive": true
          },
          "market_prob_pct": 43.3,
          "model_prob_gap_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
          "model_prob_gap_pp": 12.2,
          "model_prob_pct": 55.5,
          "outcome_separation_tier": "high",
          "paragraphs": [],
          "pricing_convergence": {
            "gap_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
            "gap_pp": 12.2,
            "label": "Moderate",
            "label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
          },
          "reliability_headline": "Moderate reliability",
          "reliability_icon": "\u2713",
          "reliability_score": 68,
          "reliability_tier": "moderate",
          "summary": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba \u2014 market direction supports the model lean.",
          "tier": "slight_edge",
          "title": "Prediction Assessment",
          "validation_label": "Warning",
          "value_split": {
            "execution_confidence": {
              "label": "Betting Confidence",
              "score": 54,
              "tier": "moderate",
              "tier_label": "Moderate"
            },
            "market_compatibility": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 39,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "model_edge_strength": {
              "label": "Model Signal Strength",
              "score": 55,
              "tier": "moderate",
              "tier_label": "Moderate"
            },
            "model_value": {
              "label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
              "note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
              "score": 39,
              "tier": "low",
              "tier_label": "Low"
            },
            "recommendation": {
              "action": "lean",
              "label": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet"
            }
          },
          "why": {
            "action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
            "bullets": [
              "Model: Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago 0.73 xG vs Instituto C\u00f3rdoba 1.55 \u2192 Instituto C\u00f3rdoba 55.5%",
              "Market: Instituto C\u00f3rdoba ~43.3% implied",
              "Market Drift: Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago odds \u2191 +14.7%"
            ],
            "one_liner": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba projects stronger on expected goals (+0.82 xG edge).",
            "title": "Why?"
          }
        },
        "forecast_certainty": {
          "note": "One outcome clearly leads the model 1X2 grid.",
          "tier": "high",
          "tier_label": "High"
        },
        "forecast_certainty_label": "High",
        "has_market_probs": true,
        "hero_edge_pp": 12.11,
        "hero_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
        "hero_side": "away",
        "market_activity": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago odds lengthened \u2191 +14.7%.",
        "market_agreement": "weak",
        "market_agreement_label": "Weak",
        "market_interpretation": {
          "bullets": [
            "The model may see a slower-scoring or closer matchup than the market.",
            "Monitor line movement before kickoff \u2014 not a betting recommendation."
          ],
          "follow_up": "However, Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 14.7%, suggesting weakening support.",
          "gap_tier": "strong",
          "lead": "The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Instituto C\u00f3rdoba.",
          "note": "Drift away from Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago \u2014 odds lengthened by 14.7% (weakening support).",
          "paragraphs": [
            "The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Instituto C\u00f3rdoba.",
            "However, Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 14.7%, suggesting weakening support.",
            "Drift away from Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago \u2014 odds lengthened by 14.7% (weakening support)."
          ],
          "quiet_market": false,
          "title": "Market Assessment"
        },
        "market_narrative": {
          "paragraphs": [
            "The fair estimate favors Instituto C\u00f3rdoba more strongly than current market pricing.",
            "At the same time, Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago has drifted \u2014 odds lengthened by 14.7%, suggesting weakening support.",
            "Broad sportsbook alignment (10/13) supports the current market view on Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago."
          ],
          "title": "Current Market Narrative"
        },
        "market_source": "closing_1x2",
        "max_gap_pp": 12.11,
        "model_validation": {
          "score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
          "status": "warning"
        },
        "model_validation_label": "Warning",
        "outcome_separation": {
          "breakdown": [
            "Favourite exceeds second outcome by 26.9 pp (at 55.5%)."
          ],
          "lead_gap_pp": 26.9,
          "max_prob_pct": 55.5,
          "note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
          "tier": "high",
          "tier_label": "High"
        },
        "outcome_separation_label": "High",
        "overall_assessment": {
          "badge_class": "strong",
          "largest_gap_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
          "largest_gap_pp": 12.1,
          "lead": "The model rates Instituto C\u00f3rdoba considerably stronger than the closing betting market.",
          "level": "strong",
          "max_gap_pp": 12.1,
          "title": "Strong Disagreement"
        },
        "rows": [
          {
            "difference_pp": -8.64,
            "edge_pp": -8.64,
            "fair_prob_pct": 16.02,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
            "market_prob_pct": 24.66,
            "side": "home",
            "signal_key": "market_higher",
            "signal_label": "Market Higher"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": -3.47,
            "edge_pp": -3.47,
            "fair_prob_pct": 28.53,
            "is_hero": false,
            "label": "Draw",
            "market_prob_pct": 32.0,
            "side": "draw",
            "signal_key": "aligned",
            "signal_label": "Aligned"
          },
          {
            "difference_pp": 12.11,
            "edge_pp": 12.11,
            "fair_prob_pct": 55.45,
            "is_hero": true,
            "label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
            "market_prob_pct": 43.34,
            "side": "away",
            "signal_key": "model_edge",
            "signal_label": "Model Edge"
          }
        ],
        "status": "strong_disagreement",
        "status_label": "Strong Disagreement",
        "steam_note": "Drift away from Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago \u2014 odds lengthened by 14.7% (weakening support).",
        "unavailable_note": ""
      },
      "interpretation": {
        "has_conflict": false,
        "paragraphs": [
          "The betting market strongly prefers Instituto C\u00f3rdoba (43.3%).",
          "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago odds have drifted longer across books (\u2191 +14.7%, 10/13) \u2014 market pricing moves against this side.",
          "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba \u2014 market direction supports the model lean."
        ],
        "show": true,
        "title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
      },
      "lifecycle": {
        "closing_implied_pct": 44.84,
        "closing_odds": 2.23,
        "closing_reason": "",
        "closing_status": "recorded",
        "closing_status_label": "Recorded",
        "clv_pending": true,
        "clv_pp": 0.0,
        "clv_reason": "",
        "clv_status": "pending",
        "context": "match",
        "current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
        "current_stage_detail": "",
        "current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
        "entry_implied_pct": 44.84,
        "entry_odds": 2.23,
        "match_phase": "upcoming",
        "match_phase_detail": "",
        "match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
        "match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
        "model_validation_label": "Warning",
        "model_validation_status": "warning",
        "stages": [
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "forecast_generated",
            "label": "Prediction Generated",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "market_detected",
            "label": "Market Compared",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "model_validated",
            "label": "Validation Passed",
            "status": "active"
          },
          {
            "detail": "PRE1",
            "id": "closing_recorded",
            "label": "Closing Recorded",
            "status": "done"
          },
          {
            "detail": "",
            "id": "clv_evaluated",
            "label": "CLV Evaluated",
            "status": "pending"
          }
        ]
      },
      "market_move_intelligence": {
        "books_reacting": 10,
        "books_reacting_detail": [
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 8,
            "bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +14.7%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 14.7
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 1,
            "bookmaker_name": "10Bet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +12.1%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 12.1
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 21,
            "bookmaker_name": "888Sport",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +12.1%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 12.1
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 7,
            "bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +12.1%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 12.1
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 32,
            "bookmaker_name": "Betano",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +11.6%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 11.6
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 9,
            "bookmaker_name": "Dafabet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +10.3%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 10.3
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 11,
            "bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +10.2%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 10.2
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 2,
            "bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +10.1%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 10.1
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 3,
            "bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
            "is_sharp": true,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +9.1%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 9.1
          },
          {
            "bookmaker_id": 36,
            "bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
            "is_sharp": false,
            "move_delta_display": "\u2191 +8.8%",
            "odds_delta_pct": 8.8
          }
        ],
        "books_total": 13,
        "breadth_display": "10/13",
        "clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
        "clv_status": "evaluated",
        "current_odds": 3.9,
        "is_drift": true,
        "move_context": "Largest move today",
        "move_display": "\u2191 +14.7%",
        "move_pct_abs": 14.7,
        "move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
        "move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 135h 14m",
        "narrative_paragraphs": [
          "Multi-book drift on Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago (14.7%, 10/13) \u2014 aligned lengthening, market pricing moves against this side.",
          "Noticeable drift \u2014 odds lengthened with multi-book confirmation (not steam)."
        ],
        "narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
        "odds_delta_pct": 14.7,
        "odds_path": {
          "chart_y_labels": [
            "3.92",
            "3.66",
            "3.40"
          ],
          "display": "3.96 \u2192 3.30 \u2192 3.90",
          "move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
          "move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 135h 14m",
          "pick_team": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
          "points": [
            {
              "label_key": "open",
              "value": "3.96"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "extreme",
              "value": "3.30"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "current",
              "value": "3.90"
            }
          ],
          "sparkline_points": [
            3.4,
            3.92,
            3.9
          ],
          "sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 28.0,0.0 56.0,0.7",
          "sparkline_trend": "up",
          "sparkline_trend_label": "One-way rise",
          "summary_boxes": [
            {
              "label_key": "open",
              "value": "3.40"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "low",
              "value": "3.40"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "high",
              "value": "3.92"
            },
            {
              "label_key": "current",
              "value": "3.90"
            }
          ]
        },
        "open_odds": 3.4,
        "page_alert_line": "Broad drift across 10/13 sportsbooks on Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
        "phase_label": "Market drift",
        "phase_tip": "Broad lengthening \u2014 market pricing moves against the tracked side.",
        "pick_team": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
        "ref_book": "Bet365",
        "seo_title_alert": "",
        "sharp_leader": "Bet365",
        "show": true,
        "signal_badge_class": "fade",
        "signal_icon": "\u2198",
        "signal_impact": {
          "current_odds": 3.9,
          "is_drift": true,
          "label": "Market Signal",
          "move_display": "\u2191 +14.7%",
          "open_odds": 3.4,
          "summary": "Broad market drift supports the same direction as the model lean.",
          "team": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
          "tone": "with"
        },
        "signal_key": "market_drift",
        "signal_label": "Drift",
        "steam_score": 43,
        "steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
        "steam_tier": "B",
        "title": "Market Move Intelligence"
      },
      "market_overview": {
        "breadth_display": "10/13",
        "current_odds": 3.9,
        "move_display": "\u2191 +14.7%",
        "open_odds": 3.4,
        "pick_team": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
        "steam_score": 43,
        "steam_team_name": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
        "steam_tier": "B"
      },
      "premium_teaser": {
        "current_divergence_pp": 12.1,
        "divergence_label": "Current divergence",
        "title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
        "unlock_items": [
          "Historical similar matches",
          "Closing odds analysis",
          "CLV tracking",
          "Sharp money signals",
          "Market efficiency rating",
          "Historical model vs market results"
        ],
        "unlock_label": "Unlock"
      },
      "show": true
    },
    "match": {
      "away_expected_goals": null,
      "away_goal_display": null,
      "away_team_display_name": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
      "away_team_id": 478,
      "away_team_logo": "/static/teams/478.webp",
      "away_team_name": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
      "away_team_slug": "instituto-cordoba",
      "country_code": "AR",
      "country_display_name": "Argentina",
      "country_flag": "/static/images/country/ar.svg",
      "country_id": 6,
      "country_name": "Argentina",
      "fixture_id": 1493065,
      "goals_away": null,
      "goals_home": null,
      "home_expected_goals": null,
      "home_goal_display": null,
      "home_team_country": "Argentina",
      "home_team_display_name": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
      "home_team_id": 1065,
      "home_team_logo": "/static/teams/1065.webp",
      "home_team_name": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
      "home_team_slug": "central-cordoba-de-santiago",
      "league_country": "Argentina",
      "league_country_display": "Argentina",
      "league_display_name": "Liga Profesional Argentina",
      "league_id": 128,
      "league_logo": "/static/leagues/128.webp",
      "league_name": "Liga Profesional Argentina",
      "league_season": 2026,
      "match_date": "2026-08-16 23:15:00",
      "score_fulltime_away": null,
      "score_fulltime_home": null,
      "score_penalty_away": null,
      "score_penalty_home": null,
      "status_long": "Not Started",
      "status_short": "NS",
      "venue_city": "Santiago del Estero",
      "venue_name": "Estadio Unico Madre de Ciudades"
    },
    "match_decision": {
      "confidence": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
        ],
        "score": 8.0
      },
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
          "away": {
            "alpha": 0.3678,
            "best_odd": 2.23,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": 0.0448,
            "ev": 0.0664,
            "implied_prob": 0.4334,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.4334,
              "draw": 0.32,
              "home": 0.2466
            },
            "model_prob": 0.5552,
            "p_final": 0.4782
          },
          "draw": {
            "alpha": 0.2841,
            "best_odd": 3.02,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.01,
            "ev": -0.0638,
            "implied_prob": 0.32,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.4334,
              "draw": 0.32,
              "home": 0.2466
            },
            "model_prob": 0.2847,
            "p_final": 0.31
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "alpha": 0.2611,
            "best_odd": 3.92,
            "calibration": {
              "active": false,
              "hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
            },
            "edge": -0.0226,
            "ev": -0.1219,
            "implied_prob": 0.2466,
            "joint_probs": {
              "away": 0.4334,
              "draw": 0.32,
              "home": 0.2466
            },
            "model_prob": 0.1601,
            "p_final": 0.224
          }
        },
        "1x2_outlier": {
          "1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
          "away": {
            "best_odd": 2.23,
            "edge": 0.1067,
            "ev": 0.238,
            "implied_prob": 0.4484,
            "model_prob": 0.5552
          },
          "draw": {
            "best_odd": 3.02,
            "edge": -0.0464,
            "ev": -0.1402,
            "implied_prob": 0.3311,
            "model_prob": 0.2847
          },
          "ev_available": true,
          "home": {
            "best_odd": 3.92,
            "edge": -0.095,
            "ev": -0.3722,
            "implied_prob": 0.2551,
            "model_prob": 0.1601
          }
        },
        "btts": {
          "btts_ev_mode": "unavailable",
          "ev_available": false,
          "market_first": {
            "available": false
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 0,
          "reliability": "low"
        },
        "ou25": {
          "ev_available": false,
          "market_first": {
            "available": false
          },
          "n_bookmakers": 0,
          "ou_ev_mode": "unavailable",
          "reliability": "low"
        }
      },
      "match_tier": "value_game",
      "min_ev": 0.02,
      "total_xg": 2.28,
      "variance_flag": false
    },
    "unified_decision": {
      "actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
      "algorithm": {
        "enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
        "game_typing_module": true,
        "version": "2.5.0"
      },
      "balanced_alternative": null,
      "best_consensus_ev": 0.0664,
      "best_outlier_ev": 0.238,
      "best_tracked_ev": 0.0664,
      "confidence": 6.0,
      "decision_confidence_v1": {
        "breakdown": [
          "pred_conf_v1_primary_line"
        ],
        "breakdown_resolved": [
          "Primary line identified (+1.0)"
        ],
        "breakdown_v2": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market aligns with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Clear xG separation"
        ],
        "score": 6.8,
        "score_v1_legacy": 6.0,
        "score_v2_pre_penalty": 6.3,
        "strength_v2": true
      },
      "decision_strength_v2": {
        "breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market aligns with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Clear xG separation"
        ],
        "score": 6.8,
        "score_pre_penalty": 6.3
      },
      "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
      "execution": {
        "1x2_dominant": true,
        "1x2_open_contest": false,
        "grade": "A",
        "stake_factor": 1.0
      },
      "favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
        "active": false,
        "gap": null,
        "side": null
      },
      "final_action": "lean",
      "final_decision": {
        "action": "lean",
        "alignment": {
          "direction_aligned": true,
          "direction_key": "agree",
          "gap_pp": 12.2,
          "key": "agree",
          "label": "Agree",
          "model_strong": false,
          "pricing_aligned": true,
          "pricing_key": "moderate",
          "probability_gap_pp": 12.2,
          "summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba)."
        },
        "alignment_key": "agree",
        "best_consensus_ev": 0.0664,
        "best_outlier_ev": 0.238,
        "confidence_band": "Moderate",
        "decision_strength": 6.8,
        "decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
        "decision_strength_v2": 6.3,
        "decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
        "execution_confidence": 54,
        "extreme_disagreement": false,
        "final_verdict_audit": {
          "action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
          "action_label": "Action",
          "decision": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
          "is_primary": false,
          "snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Instituto C\u00f3rdoba at 55.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 43.3%.",
          "why": [
            {
              "text": "Decision Model identifies Instituto C\u00f3rdoba as the value side (55.5%)",
              "tone": "ok"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
              "tone": "ok"
            },
            {
              "text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
              "tone": "bad"
            }
          ],
          "why_label": "Decision Summary"
        },
        "gap_pp": 12.2,
        "gates_failed": [
          "Execution confidence below 65"
        ],
        "has_top_pick": true,
        "headline": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
        "hero_mode": "default",
        "icon": "\u2192",
        "label": "Lean only \u2014 not a default Primary",
        "market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
        "model_conflict_detail": null,
        "model_lean": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
        "no_primary_reasons": {
          "all_triggered": [
            "market_quality"
          ],
          "calibration_mode": null,
          "codes": [
            "market_quality"
          ],
          "label": "Reason",
          "other_factors": [],
          "other_label": "Other factors",
          "primary": {
            "code": "market_quality",
            "detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
            "name": "Market Quality Risk",
            "short": "Market Quality Risk",
            "tone": "warn"
          },
          "secondary": null,
          "version": "v1"
        },
        "outlier_detected": true,
        "outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Instituto C\u00f3rdoba \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.23 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +24% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1493065 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.23 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +6.6% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
        "primary_allowed": false,
        "primary_block_explain": {
          "entries": [
            {
              "key": "positive_ev",
              "label": "Consensus EV +6.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
              "ok": true
            },
            {
              "key": "gate",
              "label": "Execution confidence below 65",
              "ok": false
            }
          ],
          "lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
          "primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
          "subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
          "title": "Why not Primary?"
        },
        "primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +6.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 6.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
        "primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +6.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 6.8/10 (display only)",
        "primary_gates": {
          "items": [
            {
              "key": "extreme_gap",
              "label": "Extreme gap",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "no"
            },
            {
              "key": "xg_calibration",
              "label": "xG calibration",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "ok"
            },
            {
              "key": "reliability",
              "label": "Rel",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "68 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "execution",
              "label": "Exec",
              "ok": false,
              "value": "54 (\u226565)"
            },
            {
              "key": "alignment",
              "label": "Align",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "agree"
            },
            {
              "key": "consensus_ev",
              "label": "ConsEV",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "+6.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
            },
            {
              "key": "top_pick",
              "label": "Pick",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            },
            {
              "key": "validation",
              "label": "Validation",
              "ok": true,
              "value": "true"
            }
          ],
          "passed": 7,
          "total": 8
        },
        "primary_type": null,
        "reasons": [
          "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba).",
          "Decision strength: 6.8/10",
          "Execution confidence below 65",
          "Outlier price +24% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
        ],
        "reliability_score": 68,
        "speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
        "strength_v2_breakdown": [
          "Base decision score (v1)",
          "Reliability supports action",
          "Market aligns with model",
          "Consensus-line +EV",
          "Clear xG separation"
        ],
        "subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
        "thresholds": {
          "extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
          "lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
          "lean_min_strength": 5.0,
          "min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
          "min_execution": 65,
          "min_reliability": 65,
          "min_strength": 7.0,
          "source": "db",
          "user_id": 2
        },
        "thresholds_source": "db",
        "thresholds_user_id": 2,
        "tier": "lean",
        "validation_ok": true,
        "value_context": {
          "consensus_ev": 0.0664,
          "consensus_ev_display": "+6.6%",
          "consensus_odds": 2.23,
          "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
          "disagreement_level": "moderate",
          "implied_prob": 0.4334,
          "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
          "model_prob": 0.5552,
          "raw_edge_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
          "raw_edge_pp": 12.2,
          "raw_implied_prob": 0.4484304932735426,
          "raw_signal_ev": 0.2381,
          "raw_signal_ev_display": "+23.8%"
        },
        "version": "v2.5",
        "xg_calibration": {
          "block_value_alert": false,
          "calibration_status": "ok",
          "deviation_pct": 14.8,
          "reasons": [
            "Clear xG separation gap=0.82"
          ],
          "recommended_action": "ok",
          "strength_delta": 0.5,
          "uplift_away": null,
          "uplift_home": null,
          "xg_separation": {
            "band": "clear",
            "block_value_alert": false,
            "separation_score": 5,
            "strength_delta": 0.5,
            "xg_gap": 0.82
          }
        }
      },
      "game_type": {
        "label_zh": "\u672a\u5206\u578b",
        "scoring_type": "neutral",
        "signals": {
          "btts_yes_prob": 0.423,
          "draw_prob": 0.2847,
          "max_1x2_prob": 0.5552,
          "over_prob": 0.399,
          "total_xg": 2.28,
          "under_prob": 0.601,
          "xg_diff": 0.82
        },
        "type": "neutral",
        "typing_weights_enabled": true
      },
      "hero_display_pick": null,
      "hero_mode": "default",
      "longshot_picks": [],
      "markets": {
        "1x2": {
          "consensus_odds": 2.23,
          "decision": "value_bet",
          "edge": 0.0448,
          "ev": 0.0664,
          "implied_prob": 0.4334,
          "max_ev_side": "away",
          "model_prob": 0.5552,
          "side": "away",
          "side_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba"
        },
        "btts": {
          "decision": "lean",
          "decision_layer": {
            "available": false
          },
          "edge": null,
          "ev": null,
          "implied_prob": null,
          "model_prob": 0.577,
          "side": "no",
          "value_side": "no"
        },
        "ou_2_5": {
          "decision": "lean",
          "decision_layer": {
            "available": false
          },
          "edge": null,
          "ev": null,
          "implied_prob": null,
          "model_prob": 0.601,
          "side": "under",
          "value_side": "under"
        }
      },
      "match_id": 1493065,
      "match_regime": {
        "action": "optional",
        "actionable": true,
        "clear_edge": false,
        "code": "thin_edge",
        "execution_line_key": null,
        "insight_line_key": null,
        "max_valid_ev": 0.0664,
        "min_ev": 0.02,
        "stake_mult": 0.25,
        "use_split_strip": false
      },
      "match_tier": "value_game",
      "no_clear_primary": false,
      "probabilities": {
        "away": 0.5552,
        "draw": 0.2847,
        "home": 0.1601
      },
      "reason_codes": [
        "model_summary"
      ],
      "secondary_pick": null,
      "secondary_picks": [],
      "show_betting_primary_label": false,
      "suppressed_primary": null,
      "teams": {
        "away": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
        "home": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago"
      },
      "top_pick": {
        "composite_score": 0.036865,
        "decision": "value_bet",
        "ev": 0.0664,
        "implied_prob": 0.4334,
        "market": "1x2",
        "model_prob": 0.5552,
        "not_dominant": false,
        "primary_strength": "clear",
        "risk_band": "strong",
        "risk_tier": "primary",
        "side": "away",
        "side_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
        "slot": "primary",
        "speculative_primary": false
      },
      "valid_markets_count": 1,
      "value_context_1x2": {
        "consensus_ev": 0.0664,
        "consensus_ev_display": "+6.6%",
        "consensus_odds": 2.23,
        "disagreement_label": "Moderate",
        "disagreement_level": "moderate",
        "implied_prob": 0.4334,
        "is_extreme_disagreement": false,
        "model_prob": 0.5552,
        "raw_edge_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
        "raw_edge_pp": 12.2,
        "raw_implied_prob": 0.4484304932735426,
        "raw_signal_ev": 0.2381,
        "raw_signal_ev_display": "+23.8%"
      }
    }
  },
  "fixture_id": 1493065,
  "generated_at_utc": "2026-08-16T23:14:07.077932+00:00",
  "lang_id": "en"
}

Dapatkan Ramalan Premium untuk Central Córdoba de Santiago & Instituto Córdoba!

Buka analisis mendalam, tip pertaruhan eksklusif, dan ramalan perlawanan dengan perkhidmatan langganan premium kami.

Langgan Sekarang
Kembali ke Statistik
Liga Profesional Argentina Liga Profesional Argentina — Kedudukan
# PASUKAN P M S K Mata
1 Estudiantes La Plata 16 9 4 3 31
2 Boca Juniors 16 8 6 2 30
3 Vélez Sarsfield 16 7 7 2 28
4 Talleres Córdoba 16 7 5 4 26
5 Independiente 16 6 6 4 24
6 Lanús 16 6 6 4 24
7 San Lorenzo 16 5 7 4 22
8 Unión Santa Fe 16 5 6 5 21
9 Instituto Córdoba 16 6 3 7 21
10 Defensa y Justicia 16 4 7 5 19
11 Gimnasia Mendoza 16 5 4 7 19
12 Platense 16 3 7 6 16
13 Central Córdoba de Santiago 16 4 4 8 16
14 Newell's Old Boys 16 3 6 7 15
15 Deportivo Riestra 16 1 8 7 11
# PASUKAN P J B +/- Mata
1 Independiente 16 24 20 +4 24
2 Unión Santa Fe 16 24 20 +4 21
3 Boca Juniors 16 22 9 +13 30
4 Estudiantes La Plata 16 19 7 +12 31
5 Vélez Sarsfield 16 18 12 +6 28
6 Lanús 16 18 15 +3 24
7 Defensa y Justicia 16 18 21 -3 19
8 Talleres Córdoba 16 17 13 +4 26
9 Instituto Córdoba 16 17 17 0 21
10 Newell's Old Boys 16 15 27 -12 15
11 San Lorenzo 16 14 14 0 22
12 Gimnasia Mendoza 16 14 22 -8 19
13 Central Córdoba de Santiago 16 11 21 -10 16
14 Platense 16 10 15 -5 16
15 Deportivo Riestra 16 5 12 -7 11
# PASUKAN P xG xGC +/- Mata
1 Instituto Córdoba 16 14.2 5.0 +9.2 21
2 Defensa y Justicia 16 11.9 8.5 +3.4 19
3 Lanús 16 12.8 9.6 +3.2 24
4 Boca Juniors 16 9.2 6.0 +3.2 30
5 Unión Santa Fe 16 9.1 6.2 +2.9 21
6 Deportivo Riestra 16 9.7 7.2 +2.5 11
7 Estudiantes La Plata 16 12.1 9.8 +2.3 31
8 Gimnasia Mendoza 16 8.7 8.6 +0.1 19
9 Independiente 16 8.1 9.1 -1.0 24
10 Talleres Córdoba 16 10.4 13.0 -2.6 26
11 Newell's Old Boys 16 5.1 8.3 -3.2 15
12 Central Córdoba de Santiago 16 9.4 13.1 -3.7 16
13 Platense 16 6.3 10.2 -3.9 16
14 San Lorenzo 16 4.8 8.7 -3.9 22
15 Vélez Sarsfield 16 6.1 10.1 -4.0 28