Pasaran yang dijejaki vs hasil sepenuh masa
Setiap baris membandingkan model pra-perlawanan lean dengan keputusan sepenuh masa.
- Pasaran Ramalan Hasilnya Hasil
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 matlamat) ✔ Betul
- Kedua-dua Pasukan Menjaringkan Gol BTTS Tidak Tidak ✔ Betul
- 1X2 Instituto Córdoba Instituto Córdoba ✔ Betul
- Cerapan skor tepat 0-1, 0-2, 1-1, 0-0, 1-2 0-1 ✔ Betul
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Taklimat AI untuk perlawanan ini belum tersedia. Selepas naik taraf pelayan, jalankan semula “Batch generate odds” untuk menjana ringkasan.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "20ed639315bdfc7ade4bae4250ddbef8af7aa917ad4959629a259c381356482c",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.55,
"away_win_prob": 0.5545,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.577,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.423,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2853,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 1.8,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.51,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 6.24,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 0.73,
"home_win_prob": 0.1602,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.399,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"under_25_prob": 0.601
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Combo Double chance : draw or Instituto C\u00f3rdoba and -3.5 goals",
"main_pick_display": "Winner : Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"percent_away": "45%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "10%",
"winner_name": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba"
},
"away_xg": 1.55,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"confidence": 55.5,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "high",
"display_text": "Winner : Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"edge": 0.1218,
"edge_gap": 0.2705,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.4334,
"model_prob": 0.5552,
"pick_type": "winner",
"probabilities": {
"away": 55.5,
"draw": 28.5,
"home": 16.0
},
"reason": "",
"selection": "away",
"selection_name": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba"
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 2.23
}
],
"risk_color": "#f44336",
"risk_key": "high_risk",
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 2.23,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba Win",
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market_fair_odds": 2.31,
"market_odds": 2.23,
"model_odds": 1.8,
"overround": 3.5,
"prob_edge": 10.7,
"value_pct": 23.9,
"value_rating": "strong_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 6,
"away_failed_to_score": 6,
"away_played": 20,
"away_score_rate": 78.8,
"home_clean_sheet": 7,
"home_failed_to_score": 11,
"home_played": 19,
"home_score_rate": 51.8,
"no_prob": 57.7,
"pick": "No",
"pick_prob": 57.7,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"yes_prob": 42.3
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.55,
"home_expected": 0.73,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 15.9
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-2",
"prob": 12.3
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 11.6
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-0",
"prob": 10.2
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 9.0
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago or Draw",
"prob": 44.5
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago or Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"prob": 71.5
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"prob": 84.0
}
],
"pick_key": "X2",
"pick_label": "Draw or Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"pick_prob": 84.0
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 55.5,
"draw_pct": 28.5,
"home_pct": 16.0,
"lean_key": "away",
"lean_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": "-3.5",
"avg_total": 2.28,
"away_avg_scored": 1.1,
"confidence": "medium",
"home_avg_scored": 0.6,
"over_prob": 39.9,
"pick": "Under 2.5",
"pick_prob": 60.1,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"total_expected": 2.28,
"under_prob": 60.1
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 23.9,
"implied_prob": 44.8,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba Win",
"model_prob": 55.6,
"odds": 2.23
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 43.34,
"draw": 32.0,
"home": 24.66
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-08-16 23:14:02",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-08-16 22:44:02",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 24.66,
"gap_pp": -8.64,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 16.01
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 32.0,
"gap_pp": -3.53,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 28.47
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 43.34,
"gap_pp": 12.18,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 55.52
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 34.43,
"gap_pp": 5.47,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 39.9
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 65.57,
"gap_pp": -5.47,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 60.1
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 3.92,
"early": 3.92,
"implied_closing_pct": 24.66,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 24.66,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.02,
"early": 3.02,
"implied_closing_pct": 32.0,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 32.0,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 2.23,
"early": 2.23,
"implied_closing_pct": 43.34,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 43.34,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 2.8,
"early": 2.8,
"implied_closing_pct": 34.43,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 34.43,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 1.47,
"early": 1.47,
"implied_closing_pct": 65.57,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 65.57,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 12.2,
"kind": "1x2_a"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -1.6,
"ev": -0.0937,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "0-1",
"market_odds": 5.7,
"market_prob": 0.1754,
"market_prob_pct": 17.5,
"model_prob": 0.159,
"model_prob_pct": 15.9,
"n_bookmakers": 10,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 15.9
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 15.9
},
{
"label": "0-2",
"prob": 12.3
},
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 11.6
},
{
"label": "0-0",
"prob": 10.2
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 9.0
}
]
},
"home_xg": 0.73,
"homepage_pick": {
"best_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"best_odds": 2.23,
"confidence": "moderate",
"display_label": "Away Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"edge": 10.7,
"ev": 23.9,
"probability": 55.5
},
"market_cards": [
{
"authority_action": "lean",
"authority_note": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"consensus_odds": 2.23,
"decision": "value_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": 0.0664,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 6.6,
"text": "+6.6%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.4334,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": 0.0664,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 6.6,
"text": "+6.6%"
},
"model_prob": 0.5552,
"raw_edge_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 12.2,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.2381,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+23.8%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"sort_key": 10209.76,
"tier": "best"
},
{
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"ev_available": false,
"ev_over": null,
"ev_over_display": null,
"ev_under": null,
"ev_under_display": null,
"featured": false,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": null,
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"over_prob": 39.9,
"sort_key": 4050.0,
"tier": "lean",
"under_prob": 60.1,
"value_side": "under"
},
{
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"ev_available": false,
"ev_no": null,
"ev_no_display": null,
"ev_yes": null,
"ev_yes_display": null,
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": null,
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"no_prob": 57.7,
"sort_key": 4050.0,
"tier": "lean",
"value_side": "no",
"yes_prob": 42.3
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 827.7,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "0-1",
"top_prob": 15.9
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "10/13",
"alert_breadth_note": "10/13 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2191 +14.7%",
"alert_team": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 12.2,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": 12.11,
"hero_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"market_prob_pct": 43.3,
"market_team": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"model_prob_pct": 55.5,
"model_team": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "!",
"status_key": "caution",
"status_label": "Use caution",
"status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
"steam_score": 43,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "market_disagree",
"read_min": 5,
"title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
"url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 12.2,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 12.2,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba)."
},
"authority": {
"action": "lean",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 12.2,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 12.2,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba)."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0664,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.238,
"confidence_band": "Moderate",
"decision_strength": 6.8,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.3,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 54,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Instituto C\u00f3rdoba at 55.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 43.3%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Instituto C\u00f3rdoba as the value side (55.5%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 12.2,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u2192",
"label": "Lean only \u2014 not a default Primary",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": null,
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Instituto C\u00f3rdoba \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.23 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +24% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1493065 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.23 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +6.6% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +6.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +6.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 6.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +6.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 6.8/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "68 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "54 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+6.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 7,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba).",
"Decision strength: 6.8/10",
"Execution confidence below 65",
"Outlier price +24% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 68,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "lean",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0664,
"consensus_ev_display": "+6.6%",
"consensus_odds": 2.23,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4334,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.5552,
"raw_edge_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 12.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4484304932735426,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.2381,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+23.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 14.8,
"reasons": [
"Clear xG separation gap=0.82"
],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "clear",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 5,
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"xg_gap": 0.82
}
}
},
"bet_status": "lean",
"books_breadth_display": "10/13",
"breadth_ratio": 0.7692307692307693,
"evidence": {
"score": 86,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "Statistical edge detected",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift supports model side (direction only \u2014 not pricing convergence)",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation warning",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 4,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Warning",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "gap",
"label": "Large market gap (12 pp)",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift aligns with model",
"tone": "ok"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 18.9,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 7.7,
"steam_coherence": 10.0,
"validation": 14.0
},
"score": 68,
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 12.11,
"market_agreement": "weak",
"max_gap_pp": 12.11,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.55,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 15.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 0.73,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.55,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 0.73 \u00b7 Away xG 1.55 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +15%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": true,
"mv_status": "warning",
"odds_delta_pct": 14.7,
"steam_conflicts": false,
"steam_move_display": "\u2191 +14.7%",
"steam_team": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 54,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 39,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 55,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 39,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "lean",
"label": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 12.2,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 12.2,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba)."
},
"authority": {
"action": "lean",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 12.2,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 12.2,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba)."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0664,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.238,
"confidence_band": "Moderate",
"decision_strength": 6.8,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.3,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 54,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Instituto C\u00f3rdoba at 55.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 43.3%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Instituto C\u00f3rdoba as the value side (55.5%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 12.2,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u2192",
"label": "Lean only \u2014 not a default Primary",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": null,
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Instituto C\u00f3rdoba \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.23 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +24% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1493065 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.23 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +6.6% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +6.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +6.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 6.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +6.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 6.8/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "68 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "54 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+6.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 7,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba).",
"Decision strength: 6.8/10",
"Execution confidence below 65",
"Outlier price +24% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 68,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "lean",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0664,
"consensus_ev_display": "+6.6%",
"consensus_odds": 2.23,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4334,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.5552,
"raw_edge_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 12.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4484304932735426,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.2381,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+23.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 14.8,
"reasons": [
"Clear xG separation gap=0.82"
],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "clear",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 5,
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"xg_gap": 0.82
}
}
},
"headline": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u2192",
"label": "Lean only \u2014 not a default Primary",
"subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"tier": "lean"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago 0.73 xG vs Instituto C\u00f3rdoba 1.55 \u2192 Instituto C\u00f3rdoba 55.5%",
"Market: Instituto C\u00f3rdoba ~43.3% implied",
"Market Drift: Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago odds \u2191 +14.7%"
],
"one_liner": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba projects stronger on expected goals (+0.82 xG edge).",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -8.64,
"fair_prob": 16.02,
"label": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
"market_prob": 24.66,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": -3.47,
"fair_prob": 28.53,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 32.0,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 12.11,
"fair_prob": 55.45,
"label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"market_prob": 43.34,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 39.9,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 60.1,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 42.3,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 57.7,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
"edge_pp": 12.11,
"fair_prob_pct": 55.45,
"hero_side": "away",
"hero_team_name": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"market_prob_pct": 43.34,
"status": "strong_disagreement",
"steam_team_name": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The statistical model estimates Instituto C\u00f3rdoba\u0027s win probability at 55.5%, compared with the closing market\u0027s implied probability of 43.3%, a difference of 12.1 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model\u0027s assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "strong",
"edge_status": "strong_disagreement",
"max_gap_pp": 12.11,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "strong",
"divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
"divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
"divergence_tier": "strong",
"edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Slight favourite",
"favourite_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "high",
"headline": "Slight edge match",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Supports model direction",
"positive": true
},
"market_prob_pct": 43.3,
"model_prob_gap_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": 12.2,
"model_prob_pct": 55.5,
"outcome_separation_tier": "high",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
"gap_pp": 12.2,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Moderate reliability",
"reliability_icon": "\u2713",
"reliability_score": 68,
"reliability_tier": "moderate",
"summary": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba \u2014 market direction supports the model lean.",
"tier": "slight_edge",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Warning",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 54,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 39,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 55,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 39,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "lean",
"label": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago 0.73 xG vs Instituto C\u00f3rdoba 1.55 \u2192 Instituto C\u00f3rdoba 55.5%",
"Market: Instituto C\u00f3rdoba ~43.3% implied",
"Market Drift: Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago odds \u2191 +14.7%"
],
"one_liner": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba projects stronger on expected goals (+0.82 xG edge).",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "One outcome clearly leads the model 1X2 grid.",
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "High",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": 12.11,
"hero_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"hero_side": "away",
"market_activity": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago odds lengthened \u2191 +14.7%.",
"market_agreement": "weak",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"The model may see a slower-scoring or closer matchup than the market.",
"Monitor line movement before kickoff \u2014 not a betting recommendation."
],
"follow_up": "However, Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 14.7%, suggesting weakening support.",
"gap_tier": "strong",
"lead": "The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Instituto C\u00f3rdoba.",
"note": "Drift away from Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago \u2014 odds lengthened by 14.7% (weakening support).",
"paragraphs": [
"The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Instituto C\u00f3rdoba.",
"However, Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 14.7%, suggesting weakening support.",
"Drift away from Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago \u2014 odds lengthened by 14.7% (weakening support)."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The fair estimate favors Instituto C\u00f3rdoba more strongly than current market pricing.",
"At the same time, Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago has drifted \u2014 odds lengthened by 14.7%, suggesting weakening support.",
"Broad sportsbook alignment (10/13) supports the current market view on Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 12.11,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
"status": "warning"
},
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"Favourite exceeds second outcome by 26.9 pp (at 55.5%)."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 26.9,
"max_prob_pct": 55.5,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "High",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "strong",
"largest_gap_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"largest_gap_pp": 12.1,
"lead": "The model rates Instituto C\u00f3rdoba considerably stronger than the closing betting market.",
"level": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 12.1,
"title": "Strong Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -8.64,
"edge_pp": -8.64,
"fair_prob_pct": 16.02,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
"market_prob_pct": 24.66,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": -3.47,
"edge_pp": -3.47,
"fair_prob_pct": 28.53,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 32.0,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 12.11,
"edge_pp": 12.11,
"fair_prob_pct": 55.45,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"market_prob_pct": 43.34,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "model_edge",
"signal_label": "Model Edge"
}
],
"status": "strong_disagreement",
"status_label": "Strong Disagreement",
"steam_note": "Drift away from Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago \u2014 odds lengthened by 14.7% (weakening support).",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": false,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Instituto C\u00f3rdoba (43.3%).",
"Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago odds have drifted longer across books (\u2191 +14.7%, 10/13) \u2014 market pricing moves against this side.",
"Instituto C\u00f3rdoba \u2014 market direction supports the model lean."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 44.84,
"closing_odds": 2.23,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 44.84,
"entry_odds": 2.23,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"model_validation_status": "warning",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 10,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +14.7%",
"odds_delta_pct": 14.7
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 1,
"bookmaker_name": "10Bet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +12.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 12.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 21,
"bookmaker_name": "888Sport",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +12.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 12.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 7,
"bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +12.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 12.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +11.6%",
"odds_delta_pct": 11.6
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 9,
"bookmaker_name": "Dafabet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +10.3%",
"odds_delta_pct": 10.3
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +10.2%",
"odds_delta_pct": 10.2
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +10.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 10.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +9.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 9.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 36,
"bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +8.8%",
"odds_delta_pct": 8.8
}
],
"books_total": 13,
"breadth_display": "10/13",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 3.9,
"is_drift": true,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2191 +14.7%",
"move_pct_abs": 14.7,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 135h 14m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"Multi-book drift on Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago (14.7%, 10/13) \u2014 aligned lengthening, market pricing moves against this side.",
"Noticeable drift \u2014 odds lengthened with multi-book confirmation (not steam)."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": 14.7,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"3.92",
"3.66",
"3.40"
],
"display": "3.96 \u2192 3.30 \u2192 3.90",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 135h 14m",
"pick_team": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.96"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "3.30"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.90"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
3.4,
3.92,
3.9
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 28.0,0.0 56.0,0.7",
"sparkline_trend": "up",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way rise",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.40"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "3.40"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "3.92"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.90"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 3.4,
"page_alert_line": "Broad drift across 10/13 sportsbooks on Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
"phase_label": "Market drift",
"phase_tip": "Broad lengthening \u2014 market pricing moves against the tracked side.",
"pick_team": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "",
"sharp_leader": "Bet365",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "fade",
"signal_icon": "\u2198",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 3.9,
"is_drift": true,
"label": "Market Signal",
"move_display": "\u2191 +14.7%",
"open_odds": 3.4,
"summary": "Broad market drift supports the same direction as the model lean.",
"team": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
"tone": "with"
},
"signal_key": "market_drift",
"signal_label": "Drift",
"steam_score": 43,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "10/13",
"current_odds": 3.9,
"move_display": "\u2191 +14.7%",
"open_odds": 3.4,
"pick_team": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
"steam_score": 43,
"steam_team_name": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
"steam_tier": "B"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 12.1,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"away_team_id": 478,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/478.webp",
"away_team_name": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"away_team_slug": "instituto-cordoba",
"country_code": "AR",
"country_display_name": "Argentina",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/ar.svg",
"country_id": 6,
"country_name": "Argentina",
"fixture_id": 1493065,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Argentina",
"home_team_display_name": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
"home_team_id": 1065,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/1065.webp",
"home_team_name": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago",
"home_team_slug": "central-cordoba-de-santiago",
"league_country": "Argentina",
"league_country_display": "Argentina",
"league_display_name": "Liga Profesional Argentina",
"league_id": 128,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/128.webp",
"league_name": "Liga Profesional Argentina",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-08-16 23:15:00",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Santiago del Estero",
"venue_name": "Estadio Unico Madre de Ciudades"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 8.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.3678,
"best_odd": 2.23,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0448,
"ev": 0.0664,
"implied_prob": 0.4334,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.4334,
"draw": 0.32,
"home": 0.2466
},
"model_prob": 0.5552,
"p_final": 0.4782
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2841,
"best_odd": 3.02,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.01,
"ev": -0.0638,
"implied_prob": 0.32,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.4334,
"draw": 0.32,
"home": 0.2466
},
"model_prob": 0.2847,
"p_final": 0.31
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.2611,
"best_odd": 3.92,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0226,
"ev": -0.1219,
"implied_prob": 0.2466,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.4334,
"draw": 0.32,
"home": 0.2466
},
"model_prob": 0.1601,
"p_final": 0.224
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 2.23,
"edge": 0.1067,
"ev": 0.238,
"implied_prob": 0.4484,
"model_prob": 0.5552
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.02,
"edge": -0.0464,
"ev": -0.1402,
"implied_prob": 0.3311,
"model_prob": 0.2847
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 3.92,
"edge": -0.095,
"ev": -0.3722,
"implied_prob": 0.2551,
"model_prob": 0.1601
}
},
"btts": {
"btts_ev_mode": "unavailable",
"ev_available": false,
"market_first": {
"available": false
},
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"reliability": "low"
},
"ou25": {
"ev_available": false,
"market_first": {
"available": false
},
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"ou_ev_mode": "unavailable",
"reliability": "low"
}
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.28,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0664,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.238,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.0664,
"confidence": 6.0,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"score": 6.8,
"score_v1_legacy": 6.0,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 6.3,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"score": 6.8,
"score_pre_penalty": 6.3
},
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": true,
"1x2_open_contest": false,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "lean",
"final_decision": {
"action": "lean",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 12.2,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 12.2,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba)."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0664,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.238,
"confidence_band": "Moderate",
"decision_strength": 6.8,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.3,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 54,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Instituto C\u00f3rdoba at 55.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 43.3%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Instituto C\u00f3rdoba as the value side (55.5%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 12.2,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u2192",
"label": "Lean only \u2014 not a default Primary",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": null,
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Instituto C\u00f3rdoba \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.23 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +24% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1493065 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.23 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +6.6% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +6.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +6.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 6.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +6.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 6.8/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "68 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "54 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+6.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 7,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Instituto C\u00f3rdoba).",
"Decision strength: 6.8/10",
"Execution confidence below 65",
"Outlier price +24% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 68,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "lean",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0664,
"consensus_ev_display": "+6.6%",
"consensus_odds": 2.23,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4334,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.5552,
"raw_edge_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 12.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4484304932735426,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.2381,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+23.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 14.8,
"reasons": [
"Clear xG separation gap=0.82"
],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "clear",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 5,
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"xg_gap": 0.82
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u672a\u5206\u578b",
"scoring_type": "neutral",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.423,
"draw_prob": 0.2847,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.5552,
"over_prob": 0.399,
"total_xg": 2.28,
"under_prob": 0.601,
"xg_diff": 0.82
},
"type": "neutral",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 2.23,
"decision": "value_bet",
"edge": 0.0448,
"ev": 0.0664,
"implied_prob": 0.4334,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.5552,
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"edge": null,
"ev": null,
"implied_prob": null,
"model_prob": 0.577,
"side": "no",
"value_side": "no"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"edge": null,
"ev": null,
"implied_prob": null,
"model_prob": 0.601,
"side": "under",
"value_side": "under"
}
},
"match_id": 1493065,
"match_regime": {
"action": "optional",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": false,
"code": "thin_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.0664,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 0.25,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.5552,
"draw": 0.2847,
"home": 0.1601
},
"reason_codes": [
"model_summary"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"home": "Central C\u00f3rdoba de Santiago"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.036865,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0664,
"implied_prob": 0.4334,
"market": "1x2",
"model_prob": 0.5552,
"not_dominant": false,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Instituto C\u00f3rdoba",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 1,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0664,
"consensus_ev_display": "+6.6%",
"consensus_odds": 2.23,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4334,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.5552,
"raw_edge_display": "+12.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 12.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4484304932735426,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.2381,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+23.8%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1493065,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-08-16T23:14:07.077932+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Terokai Kandungan Ramalan Lain
Dapatkan Ramalan Premium untuk Central Córdoba de Santiago & Instituto Córdoba!
Buka analisis mendalam, tip pertaruhan eksklusif, dan ramalan perlawanan dengan perkhidmatan langganan premium kami.
Langgan Sekarang
Liga Profesional Argentina — Kedudukan
| # | PASUKAN | P | M | S | K | Mata |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Estudiantes La Plata | 16 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 31 |
| 2 | Boca Juniors | 16 | 8 | 6 | 2 | 30 |
| 3 | Vélez Sarsfield | 16 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 28 |
| 4 | Talleres Córdoba | 16 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 26 |
| 5 | Independiente | 16 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 24 |
| 6 | Lanús | 16 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 24 |
| 7 | San Lorenzo | 16 | 5 | 7 | 4 | 22 |
| 8 | Unión Santa Fe | 16 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 21 |
| 9 | Instituto Córdoba | 16 | 6 | 3 | 7 | 21 |
| 10 | Defensa y Justicia | 16 | 4 | 7 | 5 | 19 |
| 11 | Gimnasia Mendoza | 16 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 19 |
| 12 | Platense | 16 | 3 | 7 | 6 | 16 |
| 13 | Central Córdoba de Santiago | 16 | 4 | 4 | 8 | 16 |
| 14 | Newell's Old Boys | 16 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 15 |
| 15 | Deportivo Riestra | 16 | 1 | 8 | 7 | 11 |
| # | PASUKAN | P | J | B | +/- | Mata |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Independiente | 16 | 24 | 20 | +4 | 24 |
| 2 | Unión Santa Fe | 16 | 24 | 20 | +4 | 21 |
| 3 | Boca Juniors | 16 | 22 | 9 | +13 | 30 |
| 4 | Estudiantes La Plata | 16 | 19 | 7 | +12 | 31 |
| 5 | Vélez Sarsfield | 16 | 18 | 12 | +6 | 28 |
| 6 | Lanús | 16 | 18 | 15 | +3 | 24 |
| 7 | Defensa y Justicia | 16 | 18 | 21 | -3 | 19 |
| 8 | Talleres Córdoba | 16 | 17 | 13 | +4 | 26 |
| 9 | Instituto Córdoba | 16 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 21 |
| 10 | Newell's Old Boys | 16 | 15 | 27 | -12 | 15 |
| 11 | San Lorenzo | 16 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 22 |
| 12 | Gimnasia Mendoza | 16 | 14 | 22 | -8 | 19 |
| 13 | Central Córdoba de Santiago | 16 | 11 | 21 | -10 | 16 |
| 14 | Platense | 16 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 16 |
| 15 | Deportivo Riestra | 16 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 11 |
| # | PASUKAN | P | xG | xGC | +/- | Mata |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Instituto Córdoba | 16 | 14.2 | 5.0 | +9.2 | 21 |
| 2 | Defensa y Justicia | 16 | 11.9 | 8.5 | +3.4 | 19 |
| 3 | Lanús | 16 | 12.8 | 9.6 | +3.2 | 24 |
| 4 | Boca Juniors | 16 | 9.2 | 6.0 | +3.2 | 30 |
| 5 | Unión Santa Fe | 16 | 9.1 | 6.2 | +2.9 | 21 |
| 6 | Deportivo Riestra | 16 | 9.7 | 7.2 | +2.5 | 11 |
| 7 | Estudiantes La Plata | 16 | 12.1 | 9.8 | +2.3 | 31 |
| 8 | Gimnasia Mendoza | 16 | 8.7 | 8.6 | +0.1 | 19 |
| 9 | Independiente | 16 | 8.1 | 9.1 | -1.0 | 24 |
| 10 | Talleres Córdoba | 16 | 10.4 | 13.0 | -2.6 | 26 |
| 11 | Newell's Old Boys | 16 | 5.1 | 8.3 | -3.2 | 15 |
| 12 | Central Córdoba de Santiago | 16 | 9.4 | 13.1 | -3.7 | 16 |
| 13 | Platense | 16 | 6.3 | 10.2 | -3.9 | 16 |
| 14 | San Lorenzo | 16 | 4.8 | 8.7 | -3.9 | 22 |
| 15 | Vélez Sarsfield | 16 | 6.1 | 10.1 | -4.0 | 28 |