The model missed the final outcome (USM Oujda win 2–1).
The model had projected Mouloudia Oujda at 36.6%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Pasaran yang dijejaki vs hasil sepenuh masa
Gred ramalan
C
Setiap baris membandingkan model pra-perlawanan lean dengan keputusan sepenuh masa.
- Pasaran Ramalan Hasilnya Hasil
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 matlamat) ✔ Betul
- Kedua-dua Pasukan Menjaringkan Gol BTTS Ya Ya ✔ Betul
- 1X2 Mouloudia Oujda USM Oujda ✖ tak betul
- Cerapan skor tepat 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 2-1 ✔ Betul
Model lwn Pasaran Penutup
| Hasil | Model | Menutup Pasaran | Perbezaan | isyarat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| USM Oujda | 33.8% | 37.6% | -3.9 pp | Aligned |
| Draw | 29.6% | 34.5% | -4.8 pp | Aligned |
| Mouloudia Oujda | 36.6% | 27.9% | +8.7 pp | Model Higher |
The statistical model estimates Mouloudia Oujda's win probability at 36.6%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 27.9%, a difference of 8.7 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
Selepas sepenuh masa, hasilnya ialah USM Oujda win 2–1.
Market Assessment
The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on Mouloudia Oujda.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 3 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
- Over 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
What failed
- 1X2: model leaned Mouloudia Oujda; match finished USM Oujda
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Mouloudia Oujda by 8.7 percentage points (27.9% vs model 36.6%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Laman pertaruhan premium stake: pengguna baharu boleh guna kod promo FHn2uDc1. Daftar sekarang
Garis Masa Ramalan
Cara ramalan ini beralih daripada ramalan kepada semakan sepenuh masa.
-
Sep 27, 2026 · 15:01 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · USM Oujda 33.8% · Draw 29.6% · Mouloudia Oujda 36.6%
- xG · USM Oujda 1.27 — Mouloudia Oujda 1.33
-
Sep 27, 2026 · 14:32 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · USM Oujda 2.45 · Draw 2.57 · Mouloudia Oujda 3.05
- Implied 1X2 · USM Oujda 36.3% · Draw 34.6% · Mouloudia Oujda 29.1%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 27, 2026 · 15:01 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · USM Oujda 2.39 · Draw 2.61 · Mouloudia Oujda 3.22
- Implied 1X2 · USM Oujda 37.6% · Draw 34.5% · Mouloudia Oujda 27.9%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 27, 2026 · 15:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result USM Oujda win · 2–1
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Gambar Sejarah
Dibekukan pada sepak mula — keluaran model seperti sebelum perlawanan bermula.
Keputusan sejarah:
Monitor
Keputusan Sejarah
Monitor
Hasil
Missed
Metrik pra-padanan (konteks sejarah)
Kebolehpercayaan Ramalan
75/100
· High
- Validation: Pass
Bukti
★★★★★
- Statistical edge detected
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
Pricing proximity (inverse gap)
19/100
Monitoring Confidence
33/100
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
3.22
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
Pending
Final Result
USM Oujda win · USM Oujda 2–1 Mouloudia Oujda
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
C
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Semakan Soalan Lazim
- Sejauh manakah ramalan itu tepat?
- Halaman ini menilai pasaran berarah (1X2, Lebih/Bawah 2.5, BTTS) berbanding keputusan sepenuh masa. Gred ramalan menggambarkan bilangan pasaran yang dijejaki itu sepadan dengan realiti.
- Apakah ukuran Ketepatan xG?
- Ketepatan xG membandingkan profil matlamat jangkaan pra-perlawanan model dengan garis skor sebenar — bukan sama ada setiap pasaran mencecah. Semakan arah yang kukuh boleh wujud bersama dengan skor ketepatan xG yang sederhana.
- Mengapakah skor tepat tidak diramalkan?
- Hasil skor betul ialah ekor berkemungkinan rendah walaupun model membaca profil padanan dengan baik. Kami menyerlahkan tong skor tertinggi untuk konteks; kehilangan baris tepat tidak membatalkan semakan arah.
- Adakah ini meningkatkan rekod AI?
- Setiap perlawanan selesai dilog masuk dalam saluran paip pengesahan kami. Kadar hit teragregat dan kajian CLV diterbitkan secara berasingan — halaman ini ialah jejak audit setiap perlawanan.
Ramalan adalah untuk tujuan maklumat sahaja. Sentiasa berjudi dengan penuh tanggungjawab dan dalam had anda. Prestasi masa lalu tidak menjamin hasil masa depan.
Taklimat AI untuk perlawanan ini belum tersedia. Selepas naik taraf pelayan, jalankan semula “Batch generate odds” untuk menjana ringkasan.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "c5bd751c3258050a37fa9e38ba7effe8cb11a5305c38af6316160643cd7852af",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.33,
"away_win_prob": 0.3659,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.455,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2964,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.73,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.37,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.96,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.27,
"home_win_prob": 0.3377,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Double chance : draw or Mouloudia Oujda",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "50%",
"percent_draw": "50%",
"percent_home": "0%",
"winner_name": "Mouloudia Oujda"
},
"away_xg": 1.33,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Mouloudia Oujda",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": 0.0867,
"edge_gap": 0.0284,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.2793,
"model_prob": 0.366,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 36.6,
"draw": 29.6,
"home": 33.8
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 3.22
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 3.22,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Mouloudia Oujda Win",
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market_fair_odds": 3.58,
"market_odds": 3.22,
"model_odds": 2.73,
"overround": 11.2,
"prob_edge": 5.6,
"value_pct": 17.9,
"value_rating": "value_bet"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 0,
"away_failed_to_score": 0,
"away_played": 0,
"away_score_rate": 73.6,
"home_clean_sheet": 0,
"home_failed_to_score": 0,
"home_played": 0,
"home_score_rate": 71.9,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 54.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.33,
"home_expected": 1.27,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.9
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.4
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.3
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.0
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "USM Oujda or Draw",
"prob": 63.4
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "USM Oujda or Mouloudia Oujda",
"prob": 70.4
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Mouloudia Oujda",
"prob": 66.2
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "USM Oujda or Mouloudia Oujda",
"pick_prob": 70.4
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 36.6,
"draw_pct": 29.6,
"home_pct": 33.8,
"lean_key": "away",
"lean_label": "Mouloudia Oujda"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 0.0,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 0.0,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Over 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 17.9,
"implied_prob": 31.1,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Mouloudia Oujda Win",
"model_prob": 36.6,
"odds": 3.22
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Mouloudia Oujda",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 27.93,
"draw": 34.45,
"home": 37.62
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-27 15:01:46",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-27 14:32:21",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "USM Oujda",
"largest_move_kind": "1x2_h",
"max_abs_move_pp": 1.35,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 37.62,
"gap_pp": -3.87,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 33.75
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 34.45,
"gap_pp": -4.8,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 29.65
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 27.93,
"gap_pp": 8.67,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 36.6
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 31.46,
"gap_pp": 16.74,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 48.2
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 68.54,
"gap_pp": -16.74,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 51.8
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 2.39,
"early": 2.45,
"implied_closing_pct": 37.62,
"implied_delta_pp": 1.35,
"implied_early_pct": 36.28,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 2.61,
"early": 2.57,
"implied_closing_pct": 34.45,
"implied_delta_pp": -0.13,
"implied_early_pct": 34.58,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 3.22,
"early": 3.05,
"implied_closing_pct": 27.93,
"implied_delta_pp": -1.22,
"implied_early_pct": 29.14,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 2.92,
"early": 2.89,
"implied_closing_pct": 31.46,
"implied_delta_pp": -0.06,
"implied_early_pct": 31.52,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 1.34,
"early": 1.33,
"implied_closing_pct": 68.54,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.06,
"implied_early_pct": 68.48,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": false,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 16.7,
"kind": "ou_o"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -2.9,
"ev": -0.1875,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 6.5,
"market_prob": 0.1538,
"market_prob_pct": 15.4,
"model_prob": 0.125,
"model_prob_pct": 12.5,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.9
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.4
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.3
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.0
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.27,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1362,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.83,
"edge": 0.0221,
"edge_pp": 2.2,
"market_prob": 0.3197,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.1362,
"best_odd": 2.83,
"edge": 0.0221,
"ev": -0.0327,
"implied_prob": 0.3197,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.3418
},
"p_final": 0.3418,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 16.2,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.3641,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0327,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1873,
"best_odd": 1.33,
"edge": -0.0304,
"ev": -0.1356,
"implied_prob": 0.6803,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.6499
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.393,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": true,
"raw_pct": 39.3,
"text": "+25%+"
},
"ev_under": -0.2748,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -27.5,
"text": "-27.5%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.393,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 10503.7,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "over"
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1431,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.245,
"edge": 0.0195,
"edge_pp": 2.0,
"market_prob": 0.4084,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.545,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1968,
"best_odd": 1.55,
"edge": -0.0269,
"ev": -0.1247,
"implied_prob": 0.5916,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.5647
},
"p_final": 0.428,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 13.7,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.2235,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0392,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.1431,
"best_odd": 2.245,
"edge": 0.0195,
"ev": -0.0392,
"implied_prob": 0.4084,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.428
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.2947,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -29.5,
"text": "-29.5%"
},
"ev_yes": 0.2263,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 22.6,
"text": "+22.6%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.2263,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"sort_key": 10203.67,
"tier": "best",
"value_side": "yes",
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has repriced USM Oujda, but the model still strongly favours Mouloudia Oujda.",
"consensus_odds": 3.22,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": -0.0279,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -2.8,
"text": "-2.8%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.2793,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": -0.0279,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -2.8,
"text": "-2.8%"
},
"model_prob": 0.366,
"raw_edge_display": "+8.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 8.7,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1785,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+17.8%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Mouloudia Oujda",
"sort_key": 1793.025,
"tier": "bad_ev"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.5,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.5
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "",
"alert_breadth_note": "",
"alert_move": "",
"alert_team": "",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 8.7,
"has_alert": false,
"hero_edge_pp": 8.66,
"hero_label": "Mouloudia Oujda",
"market_prob_pct": 27.9,
"market_team": "USM Oujda",
"model_prob_pct": 36.6,
"model_team": "Mouloudia Oujda",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "\u2713",
"status_key": "aligned",
"status_label": "Reliable prediction",
"status_line": "Direction aligned; check pricing gap separately",
"steam_score": null,
"steam_subtitle": "",
"steam_tier": "",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 8.7,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 8.7,
"summary": "The market has repriced USM Oujda, but the model still strongly favours Mouloudia Oujda."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 8.7,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 8.7,
"summary": "The market has repriced USM Oujda, but the model still strongly favours Mouloudia Oujda."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.393,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.393,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.7,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 35,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Mouloudia Oujda at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 27.9%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Mouloudia Oujda as the value side (36.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 8.7,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has repriced USM Oujda, but the model still strongly favours Mouloudia Oujda.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Mouloudia Oujda",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "probability_gap",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +39.3% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +39.3% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +39.3% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "78 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "35 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+39.3% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has repriced USM Oujda, but the model still strongly favours Mouloudia Oujda.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 78,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has repriced USM Oujda, but the model still strongly favours Mouloudia Oujda.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.0279,
"consensus_ev_display": "-2.8%",
"consensus_odds": 3.22,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2793,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.366,
"raw_edge_display": "+8.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 8.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.3105590062111801,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1785,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+17.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -1.5,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.06 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.06
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "3/8",
"breadth_ratio": 0.375,
"evidence": {
"score": 88,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "Statistical edge detected",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Recent market move conflicts with the model favourite",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Sharp steam detected",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation passed",
"status": "pass"
}
],
"stars": 4,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Pass",
"tone": "ok"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 20.7,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 3.8,
"steam_coherence": 7.0,
"validation": 30.0
},
"score": 78,
"stars": 4,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 8.66,
"market_agreement": "moderate",
"max_gap_pp": 8.66,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.33,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -1.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.27,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.33,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.27 \u00b7 Away xG 1.33 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -1%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": false,
"mv_status": "pass",
"odds_delta_pct": 0.0,
"steam_conflicts": null,
"steam_move_display": "+0.0%",
"steam_team": "USM Oujda",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 19,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 19,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has repriced USM Oujda, but the model still strongly favours Mouloudia Oujda.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 8.7,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 8.7,
"summary": "The market has repriced USM Oujda, but the model still strongly favours Mouloudia Oujda."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 8.7,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 8.7,
"summary": "The market has repriced USM Oujda, but the model still strongly favours Mouloudia Oujda."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.393,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.393,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.7,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 35,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Mouloudia Oujda at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 27.9%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Mouloudia Oujda as the value side (36.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 8.7,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has repriced USM Oujda, but the model still strongly favours Mouloudia Oujda.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Mouloudia Oujda",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "probability_gap",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +39.3% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +39.3% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +39.3% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "78 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "35 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+39.3% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has repriced USM Oujda, but the model still strongly favours Mouloudia Oujda.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 78,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has repriced USM Oujda, but the model still strongly favours Mouloudia Oujda.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.0279,
"consensus_ev_display": "-2.8%",
"consensus_odds": 3.22,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2793,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.366,
"raw_edge_display": "+8.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 8.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.3105590062111801,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1785,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+17.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -1.5,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.06 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.06
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has repriced USM Oujda, but the model still strongly favours Mouloudia Oujda.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: USM Oujda 1.27 xG vs Mouloudia Oujda 1.33 \u2192 Mouloudia Oujda 36.6%",
"Market: USM Oujda ~27.9% implied",
"Market Steam: USM Oujda +0.0%"
],
"one_liner": "Model and market both lean Mouloudia Oujda with no major conflict.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -3.85,
"fair_prob": 33.77,
"label": "USM Oujda",
"market_prob": 37.62,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": -4.81,
"fair_prob": 29.64,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 34.45,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 8.66,
"fair_prob": 36.59,
"label": "Mouloudia Oujda",
"market_prob": 27.93,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": 15.91,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 32.29,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": -15.91,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 67.71,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": 13.73,
"fair_prob": 54.5,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 40.77,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": -13.73,
"fair_prob": 45.5,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 59.23,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "mild_disagreement",
"edge_pp": 8.66,
"fair_prob_pct": 36.59,
"hero_side": "away",
"hero_team_name": "Mouloudia Oujda",
"market_prob_pct": 27.93,
"status": "mild_value",
"steam_team_name": "USM Oujda"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The statistical model estimates Mouloudia Oujda\u0027s win probability at 36.6%, compared with the closing market\u0027s implied probability of 27.9%, a difference of 8.7 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model\u0027s assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "moderate",
"edge_status": "mild_value",
"max_gap_pp": 8.66,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Moderate model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "moderate",
"divergence_level_label": "Moderate divergence",
"divergence_note": "Fair estimate and market pricing differ modestly. Monitor before kickoff.",
"divergence_tier": "moderate",
"edge_label": "Mild disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "mild_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Mouloudia Oujda",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 27.9,
"model_prob_gap_display": "+8.7 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": 8.7,
"model_prob_pct": 36.6,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "+8.7 percentage points",
"gap_pp": 8.7,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Moderate reliability",
"reliability_icon": "\u2713",
"reliability_score": 78,
"reliability_tier": "moderate",
"summary": "The market has repriced USM Oujda, but the model still strongly favours Mouloudia Oujda. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Pass",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 19,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 19,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: USM Oujda 1.27 xG vs Mouloudia Oujda 1.33 \u2192 Mouloudia Oujda 36.6%",
"Market: USM Oujda ~27.9% implied",
"Market Steam: USM Oujda +0.0%"
],
"one_liner": "Model and market both lean Mouloudia Oujda with no major conflict.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": 8.66,
"hero_label": "Mouloudia Oujda",
"hero_side": "away",
"market_activity": "No meaningful directional movement yet.",
"market_agreement": "moderate",
"market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Monitor line movement before kickoff \u2014 not a betting recommendation."
],
"follow_up": "",
"gap_tier": "mild",
"lead": "The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on Mouloudia Oujda.",
"note": "The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on Mouloudia Oujda.",
"paragraphs": [
"The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on Mouloudia Oujda."
],
"quiet_market": true,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The fair estimate still sits above current market pricing on Mouloudia Oujda.",
"No meaningful directional movement has emerged, and pricing remains stable across tracked sportsbooks."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 8.66,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_pass",
"status": "pass"
},
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Top two 1X2 outcomes within 2.8 percentage points."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 2.8,
"max_prob_pct": 36.6,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "moderate",
"largest_gap_label": "Mouloudia Oujda",
"largest_gap_pp": 8.7,
"lead": "The model rates Mouloudia Oujda considerably stronger than the closing betting market.",
"level": "moderate",
"max_gap_pp": 8.7,
"title": "Moderate Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -3.85,
"edge_pp": -3.85,
"fair_prob_pct": 33.77,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "USM Oujda",
"market_prob_pct": 37.62,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": -4.81,
"edge_pp": -4.81,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.64,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 34.45,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 8.66,
"edge_pp": 8.66,
"fair_prob_pct": 36.59,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Mouloudia Oujda",
"market_prob_pct": 27.93,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "model_higher",
"signal_label": "Model Higher"
}
],
"status": "mild_value",
"status_label": "Mild Value",
"steam_note": "The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on Mouloudia Oujda.",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers USM Oujda (27.9%).",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Mouloudia Oujda, Market \u2192 USM Oujda, Recent sharp money \u2192 recent line movement.",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 31.06,
"closing_odds": 3.22,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 31.06,
"entry_odds": 3.22,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"model_validation_status": "pass",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"show": false
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "3/8",
"current_odds": 2.1,
"move_display": "+0.0%",
"open_odds": 2.1,
"pick_team": "USM Oujda",
"steam_score": 8,
"steam_team_name": "USM Oujda",
"steam_tier": "C"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 8.7,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "mouloudia-oujda",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Mouloudia Oujda",
"away_team_id": 1075,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/1075.webp",
"away_team_name": "Mouloudia Oujda",
"away_team_public_id": "1EpfwsaRJNMDYL",
"away_team_slug": "mouloudia-oujda",
"country_code": "MA",
"country_display_name": "Morocco",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/ma.svg",
"country_id": 111,
"country_name": "Morocco",
"fixture_id": 1641161,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Morocco",
"home_team_display_name": "USM Oujda",
"home_team_id": 17716,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/17716.webp",
"home_team_name": "USM Oujda",
"home_team_public_id": "5msXxnqaZmyrFN",
"home_team_slug": "usm-oujda",
"ht.home_team_slug": "usm-oujda",
"league_country": "Morocco",
"league_country_display": "Morocco",
"league_display_name": "Botola 2",
"league_id": 201,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/201.webp",
"league_name": "Botola 2",
"league_public_id": "1413D8lfqq3YGD",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-27 15:00:00",
"public_id": "0swuUf0meOJcPG",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": null,
"venue_name": null
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.261,
"best_odd": 3.22,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0226,
"ev": -0.0279,
"implied_prob": 0.2793,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2793,
"draw": 0.3445,
"home": 0.3762
},
"model_prob": 0.366,
"p_final": 0.3019
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.4176,
"best_odd": 2.61,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0201,
"ev": -0.1532,
"implied_prob": 0.3445,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2793,
"draw": 0.3445,
"home": 0.3762
},
"model_prob": 0.2965,
"p_final": 0.3245
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.4239,
"best_odd": 2.39,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0164,
"ev": -0.14,
"implied_prob": 0.3762,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2793,
"draw": 0.3445,
"home": 0.3762
},
"model_prob": 0.3375,
"p_final": 0.3598
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 3.22,
"edge": 0.0554,
"ev": 0.1785,
"implied_prob": 0.3106,
"model_prob": 0.366
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 2.61,
"edge": -0.0867,
"ev": -0.2262,
"implied_prob": 0.3831,
"model_prob": 0.2965
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 2.39,
"edge": -0.0809,
"ev": -0.1933,
"implied_prob": 0.4184,
"model_prob": 0.3375
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.1968,
"alpha_yes": 0.1431,
"best_no_odd": 1.55,
"best_yes_odd": 2.25,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": -0.1373,
"edge_yes": 0.1373,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.2947,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.1247,
"ev_yes": 0.2263,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0392,
"implied_no": 0.5923,
"implied_yes": 0.4077,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1968,
"best_odd": 1.55,
"edge": -0.0269,
"ev": -0.1247,
"implied_prob": 0.5916,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.5647
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.1431,
"best_odd": 2.245,
"edge": 0.0195,
"ev": -0.0392,
"implied_prob": 0.4084,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.428
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"p_final_no": 0.5647,
"p_final_yes": 0.428,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.1362,
"alpha_under": 0.1873,
"best_over_odd": 2.89,
"best_under_odd": 1.4,
"consensus_over_odd": 2.83,
"consensus_under_odd": 1.33,
"edge_over": 0.1591,
"edge_under": -0.1591,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.393,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.0327,
"ev_under": -0.2748,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.1356,
"implied_over": 0.3229,
"implied_over_mf": 0.3197,
"implied_under": 0.6771,
"implied_under_mf": 0.6803,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.1362,
"best_odd": 2.83,
"edge": 0.0221,
"ev": -0.0327,
"implied_prob": 0.3197,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.3418
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1873,
"best_odd": 1.33,
"edge": -0.0304,
"ev": -0.1356,
"implied_prob": 0.6803,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.6499
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.3418,
"p_final_under": 0.6499,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.393,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.393,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.393,
"confidence": 6.5,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_v1_legacy": 6.5,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 4.7,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_pre_penalty": 4.7
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 8.7,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 8.7,
"summary": "The market has repriced USM Oujda, but the model still strongly favours Mouloudia Oujda."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.393,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.393,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.7,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 35,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Mouloudia Oujda at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 27.9%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Mouloudia Oujda as the value side (36.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 8.7,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has repriced USM Oujda, but the model still strongly favours Mouloudia Oujda.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Mouloudia Oujda",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "probability_gap",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +39.3% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +39.3% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +39.3% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "78 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "35 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+39.3% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has repriced USM Oujda, but the model still strongly favours Mouloudia Oujda.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 78,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has repriced USM Oujda, but the model still strongly favours Mouloudia Oujda.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.0279,
"consensus_ev_display": "-2.8%",
"consensus_odds": 3.22,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2793,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.366,
"raw_edge_display": "+8.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 8.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.3105590062111801,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1785,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+17.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -1.5,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.06 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.06
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"draw_prob": 0.2965,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.366,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.06
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 3.22,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": 0.0226,
"ev": -0.0279,
"implied_prob": 0.2793,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.366,
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Mouloudia Oujda"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1431,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.245,
"edge": 0.0195,
"market_prob": 0.4084,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.545,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1968,
"best_odd": 1.55,
"edge": -0.0269,
"ev": -0.1247,
"implied_prob": 0.5916,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.5647
},
"p_final": 0.428,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0392,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.1431,
"best_odd": 2.245,
"edge": 0.0195,
"ev": -0.0392,
"implied_prob": 0.4084,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.428
}
},
"edge": 0.1373,
"ev": 0.2263,
"implied_prob": 0.4077,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"side": "yes",
"value_side": "yes"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1362,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.83,
"edge": 0.0221,
"market_prob": 0.3197,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.1362,
"best_odd": 2.83,
"edge": 0.0221,
"ev": -0.0327,
"implied_prob": 0.3197,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.3418
},
"p_final": 0.3418,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0327,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1873,
"best_odd": 1.33,
"edge": -0.0304,
"ev": -0.1356,
"implied_prob": 0.6803,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.6499
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"edge": 0.1591,
"ev": 0.393,
"implied_prob": 0.3229,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"side": "over",
"value_side": "over"
}
},
"match_id": 1641161,
"match_regime": {
"action": "bet",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": true,
"code": "clear_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.393,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 1.0,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.366,
"draw": 0.2965,
"home": 0.3375
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2"
],
"secondary_pick": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.2263,
"implied_prob": 0.4077,
"market": "btts",
"model_prob": 0.545,
"not_dominant": false,
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "yes",
"slot": "secondary"
},
"secondary_picks": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.2263,
"implied_prob": 0.4077,
"market": "btts",
"model_prob": 0.545,
"not_dominant": false,
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "yes",
"slot": "secondary"
}
],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Mouloudia Oujda",
"home": "USM Oujda"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.132598,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.393,
"implied_prob": 0.3229,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"not_dominant": true,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "over",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 2,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.0279,
"consensus_ev_display": "-2.8%",
"consensus_odds": 3.22,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.2793,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.366,
"raw_edge_display": "+8.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 8.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.3105590062111801,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1785,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+17.8%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1641161,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-27T15:01:48.978717+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Terokai Kandungan Ramalan Lain
Dapatkan Ramalan Premium untuk USM Oujda & Mouloudia Oujda!
Buka analisis mendalam, tip pertaruhan eksklusif, dan ramalan perlawanan dengan perkhidmatan langganan premium kami.
Langgan Sekarang
Maghribi. Botola 2 Ramalan
