AI correctly predicted the Lancaster City win.
The match finished 1–2, validating the model's directional assessment.
Pasaran yang dijejaki vs hasil sepenuh masa
Setiap baris membandingkan model pra-perlawanan lean dengan keputusan sepenuh masa.
- Pasaran Ramalan Hasilnya Hasil
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 matlamat) ✖ tak betul
- Kedua-dua Pasukan Menjaringkan Gol BTTS Ya Ya ✔ Betul
- 1X2 Lancaster City Lancaster City ✔ Betul
- Cerapan skor tepat 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 1-2 ✔ Betul
Model lwn Pasaran Penutup
| Hasil | Model | Menutup Pasaran | Perbezaan | isyarat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Guiseley AFC | 32.4% | 48.2% | -15.8 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 29.6% | 24.6% | +5.0 pp | Aligned |
| Lancaster City | 38.0% | 27.2% | +10.8 pp | Model Edge |
The closing market estimates Guiseley AFC's win probability at 48.2%, compared with the model's estimate of 32.4%, a difference of 15.8 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE10.
Selepas sepenuh masa, lean arah model sepadan dengan keputusan (Lancaster City win 1–2).
Market Assessment
The market is materially more optimistic about Guiseley AFC than the current fair estimate.
- Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
- Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 3 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
- Exact score 1–2 fell within the model's highlighted bins
What failed
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (3 goals)
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Lancaster City higher (53.8% vs model 38.0%, 15.8 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Lancaster City win 1–2).
Garis Masa Ramalan
Cara ramalan ini beralih daripada ramalan kepada semakan sepenuh masa.
-
Aug 28, 2026 · 18:43 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Guiseley AFC 32.4% · Draw 29.6% · Lancaster City 38.0%
- xG · Guiseley AFC 1.24 — Lancaster City 1.36
-
Aug 28, 2026 · 18:23 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Guiseley AFC 1.89 · Draw 3.61 · Lancaster City 3.32
- Implied 1X2 · Guiseley AFC 47.8% · Draw 25.0% · Lancaster City 27.2%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 28, 2026 · 18:43 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE10
- 1X2 odds · Guiseley AFC 1.90 · Draw 3.72 · Lancaster City 3.36
- Implied 1X2 · Guiseley AFC 48.2% · Draw 24.6% · Lancaster City 27.2%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 28, 2026 · 18:45 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Lancaster City win · 1–2
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Gambar Sejarah
Dibekukan pada sepak mula — keluaran model seperti sebelum perlawanan bermula.
Metrik pra-padanan (konteks sejarah)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (16 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Pricing remains divergent
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Semakan Soalan Lazim
- Sejauh manakah ramalan itu tepat?
- Halaman ini menilai pasaran berarah (1X2, Lebih/Bawah 2.5, BTTS) berbanding keputusan sepenuh masa. Gred ramalan menggambarkan bilangan pasaran yang dijejaki itu sepadan dengan realiti.
- Apakah ukuran Ketepatan xG?
- Ketepatan xG membandingkan profil matlamat jangkaan pra-perlawanan model dengan garis skor sebenar — bukan sama ada setiap pasaran mencecah. Semakan arah yang kukuh boleh wujud bersama dengan skor ketepatan xG yang sederhana.
- Mengapakah skor tepat tidak diramalkan?
- Hasil skor betul ialah ekor berkemungkinan rendah walaupun model membaca profil padanan dengan baik. Kami menyerlahkan tong skor tertinggi untuk konteks; kehilangan baris tepat tidak membatalkan semakan arah.
- Adakah ini meningkatkan rekod AI?
- Setiap perlawanan selesai dilog masuk dalam saluran paip pengesahan kami. Kadar hit teragregat dan kajian CLV diterbitkan secara berasingan — halaman ini ialah jejak audit setiap perlawanan.
Ramalan adalah untuk tujuan maklumat sahaja. Sentiasa berjudi dengan penuh tanggungjawab dan dalam had anda. Prestasi masa lalu tidak menjamin hasil masa depan.
Terokai Kandungan Ramalan Lain
Dapatkan Ramalan Premium untuk Guiseley AFC & Lancaster City!
Buka analisis mendalam, tip pertaruhan eksklusif, dan ramalan perlawanan dengan perkhidmatan langganan premium kami.
Langgan Sekarang
Perdana Bukan Liga - Utara — Kedudukan
| # | PASUKAN | P | M | S | K | Mata |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cleethorpes Town | 10 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 23 |
| 2 | Avro | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 22 |
| 3 | Redcar Athletic | 10 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 22 |
| 4 | Guiseley AFC | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 19 |
| 5 | Warrington Town | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 17 |
| 6 | Bury | 9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 16 |
| 7 | Curzon Ashton | 9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 16 |
| 8 | Workington | 9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 16 |
| 9 | Gainsborough Trinity | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 13 |
| 10 | Rylands | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 13 |
| 11 | Alfreton Town | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 12 |
| 12 | Whitby Town | 9 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 12 |
| 13 | Ashton United | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 11 |
| 14 | Hyde United | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| 15 | AFC Emley | 9 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 10 |
| 16 | Lancaster City | 9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 10 |
| 17 | Leek Town | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
| 18 | Bamber Bridge | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
| 19 | Stockton Town | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 |
| 20 | Ilkeston Town | 9 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| 21 | Quorn | 9 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| 22 | United of Manchester | 9 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 |
| # | PASUKAN | P | J | B | +/- | Mata |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Avro | 9 | 28 | 16 | +12 | 22 |
| 2 | Cleethorpes Town | 10 | 25 | 6 | +19 | 23 |
| 3 | Guiseley AFC | 9 | 22 | 10 | +12 | 19 |
| 4 | Redcar Athletic | 10 | 19 | 7 | +12 | 22 |
| 5 | Bury | 9 | 19 | 8 | +11 | 16 |
| 6 | Leek Town | 10 | 19 | 20 | -1 | 9 |
| 7 | Curzon Ashton | 9 | 18 | 10 | +8 | 16 |
| 8 | Warrington Town | 9 | 18 | 14 | +4 | 17 |
| 9 | Workington | 9 | 17 | 15 | +2 | 16 |
| 10 | Alfreton Town | 9 | 15 | 10 | +5 | 12 |
| 11 | Gainsborough Trinity | 9 | 14 | 12 | +2 | 13 |
| 12 | Whitby Town | 9 | 14 | 24 | -10 | 12 |
| 13 | Bamber Bridge | 10 | 14 | 27 | -13 | 9 |
| 14 | Stockton Town | 10 | 13 | 20 | -7 | 8 |
| 15 | Rylands | 9 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 13 |
| 16 | United of Manchester | 9 | 12 | 19 | -7 | 5 |
| 17 | Quorn | 9 | 12 | 23 | -11 | 6 |
| 18 | Hyde United | 10 | 11 | 19 | -8 | 11 |
| 19 | Ashton United | 9 | 10 | 9 | +1 | 11 |
| 20 | Lancaster City | 9 | 9 | 17 | -8 | 10 |
| 21 | AFC Emley | 9 | 8 | 15 | -7 | 10 |
| 22 | Ilkeston Town | 9 | 6 | 21 | -15 | 7 |