The model missed the final outcome (Getafe win 1–0).
The model had projected Malaga at 40.1%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Pasaran yang dijejaki vs hasil sepenuh masa
Setiap baris membandingkan model pra-perlawanan lean dengan keputusan sepenuh masa.
- Pasaran Ramalan Hasilnya Hasil
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 matlamat) ✖ tak betul
- Kedua-dua Pasukan Menjaringkan Gol BTTS Ya Tidak ✖ tak betul
- 1X2 Malaga Getafe ✖ tak betul
- Cerapan skor tepat 0-1, 1-1, 0-0, 1-0, 0-2 1-0 ✔ Betul
Model lwn Pasaran Penutup
| Hasil | Model | Menutup Pasaran | Perbezaan | isyarat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Getafe | 27.5% | 48.3% | -20.8 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 32.4% | 30.6% | +1.7 pp | Aligned |
| Malaga | 40.1% | 21.0% | +19.1 pp | Model Edge |
The closing market estimates Getafe's win probability at 48.3%, compared with the model's estimate of 27.5%, a difference of 20.8 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
Selepas sepenuh masa, hasilnya ialah Getafe win 1–0.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Low-scoring profile materialised (ΣxG 2.19, 1 goals)
- Exact score 1–0 fell within the model's highlighted bins
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Over 2.5; match finished Under 2.5 (1 goals)
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Malaga by 20.8 percentage points (60.9% vs model 40.1%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Garis Masa Ramalan
Cara ramalan ini beralih daripada ramalan kepada semakan sepenuh masa.
-
Sep 20, 2026 · 12:01 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Getafe 27.5% · Draw 32.3% · Malaga 40.1%
- xG · Getafe 0.97 — Malaga 1.22
-
Sep 20, 2026 · 11:32 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Getafe 2.01 · Draw 3.17 · Malaga 4.62
- Implied 1X2 · Getafe 48.3% · Draw 30.6% · Malaga 21.0%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 20, 2026 · 12:01 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Getafe 2.01 · Draw 3.17 · Malaga 4.62
- Implied 1X2 · Getafe 48.3% · Draw 30.6% · Malaga 21.0%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 20, 2026 · 12:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Getafe win · 1–0
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Gambar Sejarah
Dibekukan pada sepak mula — keluaran model seperti sebelum perlawanan bermula.
Label sejarah: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".
Metrik pra-padanan (konteks sejarah)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (21 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Pricing remains divergent
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Semakan Soalan Lazim
- Sejauh manakah ramalan itu tepat?
- Halaman ini menilai pasaran berarah (1X2, Lebih/Bawah 2.5, BTTS) berbanding keputusan sepenuh masa. Gred ramalan menggambarkan bilangan pasaran yang dijejaki itu sepadan dengan realiti.
- Apakah ukuran Ketepatan xG?
- Ketepatan xG membandingkan profil matlamat jangkaan pra-perlawanan model dengan garis skor sebenar — bukan sama ada setiap pasaran mencecah. Semakan arah yang kukuh boleh wujud bersama dengan skor ketepatan xG yang sederhana.
- Mengapakah skor tepat tidak diramalkan?
- Hasil skor betul ialah ekor berkemungkinan rendah walaupun model membaca profil padanan dengan baik. Kami menyerlahkan tong skor tertinggi untuk konteks; kehilangan baris tepat tidak membatalkan semakan arah.
- Adakah ini meningkatkan rekod AI?
- Setiap perlawanan selesai dilog masuk dalam saluran paip pengesahan kami. Kadar hit teragregat dan kajian CLV diterbitkan secara berasingan — halaman ini ialah jejak audit setiap perlawanan.
Ramalan adalah untuk tujuan maklumat sahaja. Sentiasa berjudi dengan penuh tanggungjawab dan dalam had anda. Prestasi masa lalu tidak menjamin hasil masa depan.
Taklimat AI untuk perlawanan ini belum tersedia. Selepas naik taraf pelayan, jalankan semula “Batch generate odds” untuk menjana ringkasan.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "35eff8d57ce1fbd4e79a248b51ee3357f23dd4ca1d71da2f98ab250659bf6095",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.22,
"away_win_prob": 0.4011,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.545,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.455,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.3235,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.49,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.09,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 3.63,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 0.97,
"home_win_prob": 0.2754,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.375,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"under_25_prob": 0.625
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Combo Double chance : Getafe or draw and -3.5 goals",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "10%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "45%",
"winner_name": "Getafe"
},
"away_xg": 1.22,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Malaga",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": 0.1911,
"edge_gap": 0.0779,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.2103,
"model_prob": 0.4013,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 40.1,
"draw": 32.3,
"home": 27.5
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 4.62
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 4.62,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Malaga Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Away",
"market_fair_odds": 4.76,
"market_odds": 4.62,
"model_odds": 2.49,
"overround": 2.9,
"prob_edge": 18.5,
"value_pct": 85.5,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 1,
"away_failed_to_score": 3,
"away_played": 5,
"away_score_rate": 70.5,
"home_clean_sheet": 1,
"home_failed_to_score": 2,
"home_played": 4,
"home_score_rate": 62.1,
"no_prob": 54.5,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 54.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 45.5
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.22,
"home_expected": 0.97,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 13.7
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 13.2
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-0",
"prob": 11.2
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 10.9
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-2",
"prob": 8.3
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Getafe or Draw",
"prob": 59.9
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Getafe or Malaga",
"prob": 67.6
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Malaga",
"prob": 72.5
}
],
"pick_key": "X2",
"pick_label": "Draw or Malaga",
"pick_prob": 72.5
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 40.1,
"draw_pct": 32.4,
"home_pct": 27.5,
"lean_key": "away",
"lean_label": "Malaga"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": "-3.5",
"avg_total": 2.19,
"away_avg_scored": 0.4,
"confidence": "medium",
"home_avg_scored": 0.5,
"over_prob": 37.5,
"pick": "Over 2.5",
"pick_prob": 62.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.19,
"under_prob": 62.5
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 85.5,
"implied_prob": 21.6,
"is_value": false,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Malaga Win",
"model_prob": 40.2,
"odds": 4.62
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Malaga",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 21.03,
"draw": 30.64,
"home": 48.33
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-20 12:01:09",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-20 11:32:27",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Getafe",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 48.33,
"gap_pp": -20.8,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 27.53
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 30.64,
"gap_pp": 1.7,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 32.34
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 21.03,
"gap_pp": 19.11,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 40.13
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 37.47,
"gap_pp": 0.03,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 37.5
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 62.53,
"gap_pp": -0.03,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 62.5
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 2.01,
"early": 2.01,
"implied_closing_pct": 48.33,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 48.33,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.17,
"early": 3.17,
"implied_closing_pct": 30.64,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 30.64,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 4.62,
"early": 4.62,
"implied_closing_pct": 21.03,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 21.03,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 2.57,
"early": 2.57,
"implied_closing_pct": 37.47,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 37.47,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 1.54,
"early": 1.54,
"implied_closing_pct": 62.53,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 62.53,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 19.1,
"kind": "1x2_a"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": {
"best_bookmaker": "Betano",
"best_odds": 22.0,
"edge": 3.8,
"ev": 83.2,
"label": "0-2",
"probability": 8.3
},
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": 1.9,
"ev": 0.1645,
"has_edge": true,
"label": "0-1",
"market_odds": 8.5,
"market_prob": 0.1176,
"market_prob_pct": 11.8,
"model_prob": 0.137,
"model_prob_pct": 13.7,
"n_bookmakers": 9,
"status_key": "positive_edge"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 13.7
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 13.7
},
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 13.2
},
{
"label": "0-0",
"prob": 11.2
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 10.9
},
{
"label": "0-2",
"prob": 8.3
}
]
},
"home_xg": 0.97,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"authority_action": "wait",
"authority_note": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
"consensus_odds": 4.62,
"decision": "value_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"ev": 0.0974,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 9.7,
"text": "+9.7%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.2103,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": 0.0974,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 9.7,
"text": "+9.7%"
},
"model_prob": 0.4013,
"raw_edge_display": "+19.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 19.1,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.854,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+85.4%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Malaga",
"sort_key": 10237.66,
"tier": "best"
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2741,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.585,
"edge": 0.0039,
"edge_pp": 0.4,
"market_prob": 0.3609,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.375,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2741,
"best_odd": 2.585,
"edge": 0.0039,
"ev": -0.057,
"implied_prob": 0.3609,
"model_prob": 0.375,
"p_final": 0.3648
},
"p_final": 0.3648,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"raw_edge_pp": 1.4,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0306,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.057,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.3769,
"best_odd": 1.46,
"edge": -0.0053,
"ev": -0.0747,
"implied_prob": 0.6391,
"model_prob": 0.625,
"p_final": 0.6338
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.0312,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 3.1,
"text": "+3.1%"
},
"ev_under": -0.05,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -5.0,
"text": "-5.0%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.0312,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over_prob": 37.5,
"sort_key": 10028.08,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 62.5,
"value_side": "over"
},
{
"decision": "small_edge",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.3363,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.15,
"edge": 0.0088,
"edge_pp": 0.9,
"market_prob": 0.429,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.37,
"best_odd": 1.615,
"edge": -0.0096,
"ev": -0.0933,
"implied_prob": 0.571,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5614
},
"p_final": 0.4377,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"raw_edge_pp": 2.6,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0218,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0589,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.3363,
"best_odd": 2.15,
"edge": 0.0088,
"ev": -0.0589,
"implied_prob": 0.429,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4377
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.0898,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -9.0,
"text": "-9.0%"
},
"ev_yes": 0.0237,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 2.4,
"text": "+2.4%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.0237,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no_prob": 54.5,
"sort_key": 5218.96,
"tier": "lean",
"value_side": "yes",
"yes_prob": 45.5
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 821.1,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "0-1",
"top_prob": 13.7
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "9/9",
"alert_breadth_note": "9/9 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2191 +10.8%",
"alert_team": "Malaga",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 20.8,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -20.79,
"hero_label": "Getafe",
"market_prob_pct": 21.0,
"market_team": "Getafe",
"model_prob_pct": 40.1,
"model_team": "Malaga",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "!",
"status_key": "caution",
"status_label": "Use caution",
"status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
"steam_score": 42,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "market_disagree",
"read_min": 5,
"title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
"url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 20.8,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 20.8,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Malaga, but the model still strongly favours Malaga."
},
"authority": {
"action": "wait",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 20.8,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 20.8,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Malaga, but the model still strongly favours Malaga."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0974,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.8541,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 16,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Malaga at 40.1%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 21.0%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Malaga as the value side (40.1%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 19.1,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u23f8",
"label": "Wait for validation",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Malaga, but the model still strongly favours Malaga.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Malaga",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Malaga \u00b7 decimal odds ~4.62 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +85% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1570398 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22484.62 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +9.7% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +9.7% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +9.7% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +9.7% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "56 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "16 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+9.7% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": false,
"value": "false"
}
],
"passed": 4,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Malaga, but the model still strongly favours Malaga.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +85% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 56,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV"
],
"subline": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "wait",
"validation_ok": false,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0974,
"consensus_ev_display": "+9.7%",
"consensus_odds": 4.62,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.2103,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4013,
"raw_edge_display": "+19.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 19.1,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.21645021645021645,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.854,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+85.4%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -9.6,
"reasons": [],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "ok",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 0,
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"xg_gap": 0.25
}
}
},
"bet_status": "wait",
"books_breadth_display": "9/9",
"breadth_ratio": 1.0,
"evidence": {
"score": 57,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Recent market move conflicts with the model favourite",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation warning",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Warning",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "gap",
"label": "Large market gap (21 pp)",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 14.6,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 10.0,
"steam_coherence": 0.0,
"validation": 14.0
},
"score": 56,
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 20.79,
"market_agreement": "weak",
"max_gap_pp": 20.79,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.22,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -10.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 0.97,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.22,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 0.97 \u00b7 Away xG 1.22 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -10%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": true,
"mv_status": "warning",
"odds_delta_pct": 10.8,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2191 +10.8%",
"steam_team": "Malaga",
"suppress_execution": true,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 16,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 1,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 40,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 1,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "wait",
"label": "Wait - No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved away from Malaga, but the model still strongly favours Malaga.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 20.8,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 20.8,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Malaga, but the model still strongly favours Malaga."
},
"authority": {
"action": "wait",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 20.8,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 20.8,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Malaga, but the model still strongly favours Malaga."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0974,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.8541,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 16,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Malaga at 40.1%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 21.0%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Malaga as the value side (40.1%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 19.1,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u23f8",
"label": "Wait for validation",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Malaga, but the model still strongly favours Malaga.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Malaga",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Malaga \u00b7 decimal odds ~4.62 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +85% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1570398 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22484.62 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +9.7% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +9.7% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +9.7% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +9.7% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "56 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "16 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+9.7% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": false,
"value": "false"
}
],
"passed": 4,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Malaga, but the model still strongly favours Malaga.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +85% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 56,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV"
],
"subline": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "wait",
"validation_ok": false,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0974,
"consensus_ev_display": "+9.7%",
"consensus_odds": 4.62,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.2103,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4013,
"raw_edge_display": "+19.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 19.1,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.21645021645021645,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.854,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+85.4%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -9.6,
"reasons": [],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "ok",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 0,
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"xg_gap": 0.25
}
}
},
"headline": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u23f8",
"label": "Wait for validation",
"subline": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
"tier": "wait"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Getafe 0.97 xG vs Malaga 1.22 \u2192 Malaga 40.1%",
"Market: Getafe ~21.0% implied",
"Market Drift: Malaga odds \u2191 +10.8%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Malaga, but the market has moved away from Malaga.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -20.79,
"fair_prob": 27.54,
"label": "Getafe",
"market_prob": 48.33,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 1.71,
"fair_prob": 32.35,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 30.64,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 19.08,
"fair_prob": 40.11,
"label": "Malaga",
"market_prob": 21.03,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": 1.2,
"fair_prob": 37.5,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 36.3,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": -1.2,
"fair_prob": 62.5,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 63.7,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": 2.72,
"fair_prob": 45.5,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 42.78,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": -2.72,
"fair_prob": 54.5,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 57.22,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "extreme_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -20.79,
"fair_prob_pct": 27.54,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "Getafe",
"market_prob_pct": 48.33,
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "Malaga"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Getafe\u0027s win probability at 48.3%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 27.5%, a difference of 20.8 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "extreme",
"edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 20.79,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": true
},
"divergence_label": "Extreme model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "extreme",
"divergence_level_label": "Extreme divergence",
"divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs substantially from current market pricing. Large divergences can occur when rating inputs are incomplete, team-strength estimates are uncertain, or the market incorporates information not present in the model. Interpret with caution.",
"divergence_tier": "extreme",
"edge_label": "Extreme disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "extreme_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Malaga",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 21.0,
"model_prob_gap_display": "+19.1 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": 19.1,
"model_prob_pct": 40.1,
"outcome_separation_tier": "medium",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "+19.1 percentage points",
"gap_pp": 19.1,
"label": "Low convergence",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_low"
},
"reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
"reliability_icon": "!",
"reliability_score": 56,
"reliability_tier": "limited",
"summary": "The market has moved away from Malaga, but the model still strongly favours Malaga. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Warning",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 16,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 1,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 40,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 1,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "wait",
"label": "Wait - No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Getafe 0.97 xG vs Malaga 1.22 \u2192 Malaga 40.1%",
"Market: Getafe ~21.0% implied",
"Market Drift: Malaga odds \u2191 +10.8%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Malaga, but the market has moved away from Malaga.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -20.79,
"hero_label": "Getafe",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "Malaga odds lengthened \u2191 +10.8%.",
"market_agreement": "weak",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_interpretation": {},
"market_narrative": {},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 20.79,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
"status": "warning"
},
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Favourite exceeds second outcome by 7.8 pp (at 40.1%)."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 7.8,
"max_prob_pct": 40.1,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "medium",
"tier_label": "Medium"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Medium",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "extreme",
"largest_gap_label": "Getafe",
"largest_gap_pp": -20.8,
"lead": "The closing market prices Getafe higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "extreme",
"max_gap_pp": 20.8,
"title": "Strong Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -20.79,
"edge_pp": -20.79,
"fair_prob_pct": 27.54,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Getafe",
"market_prob_pct": 48.33,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 1.71,
"edge_pp": 1.71,
"fair_prob_pct": 32.35,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 30.64,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 19.08,
"edge_pp": 19.08,
"fair_prob_pct": 40.11,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Malaga",
"market_prob_pct": 21.03,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "model_edge",
"signal_label": "Model Edge"
}
],
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Getafe (21.0%).",
"Malaga odds have drifted longer across books (\u2191 +10.8%, 9/9) \u2014 market pricing moves against this side.",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Malaga, Market \u2192 Getafe, while Malaga odds drifted longer (market fade).",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 49.75,
"closing_odds": 2.01,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 49.75,
"entry_odds": 2.01,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"model_validation_status": "warning",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 9,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +17.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": 17.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 4,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +14.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": 14.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +10.8%",
"odds_delta_pct": 10.8
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 36,
"bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +10.8%",
"odds_delta_pct": 10.8
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +9.5%",
"odds_delta_pct": 9.5
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +8.7%",
"odds_delta_pct": 8.7
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +6.6%",
"odds_delta_pct": 6.6
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 5,
"bookmaker_name": "SBO",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +5.7%",
"odds_delta_pct": 5.7
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 7,
"bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +5.3%",
"odds_delta_pct": 5.3
}
],
"books_total": 9,
"breadth_display": "9/9",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 4.1,
"is_drift": true,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2191 +10.8%",
"move_pct_abs": 10.8,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 149h 2m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"Multi-book drift on Malaga (10.8%, 9/9) \u2014 aligned lengthening, market pricing moves against this side.",
"Noticeable drift \u2014 odds lengthened with multi-book confirmation (not steam)."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": 10.8,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"4.62",
"4.16",
"3.70"
],
"display": "4.44 \u2192 3.48 \u2192 4.10",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 149h 2m",
"pick_team": "Malaga",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "4.44"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "3.48"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "4.10"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
3.7,
4.62,
4.1
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 28.0,0.0 56.0,10.2",
"sparkline_trend": "up",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way rise",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.70"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "3.70"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "4.62"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "4.10"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 3.7,
"page_alert_line": "Broad drift across 9/9 sportsbooks on Malaga",
"phase_label": "Market drift",
"phase_tip": "Broad lengthening \u2014 market pricing moves against the tracked side.",
"pick_team": "Malaga",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "",
"sharp_leader": "Betfair",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "fade",
"signal_icon": "\u2198",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 4.1,
"is_drift": true,
"label": "Market Signal",
"move_display": "\u2191 +10.8%",
"open_odds": 3.7,
"summary": "Market moved away from Malaga while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "Malaga",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "market_drift",
"signal_label": "Drift",
"steam_score": 42,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "9/9",
"current_odds": 4.1,
"move_display": "\u2191 +10.8%",
"open_odds": 3.7,
"pick_team": "Malaga",
"steam_score": 42,
"steam_team_name": "Malaga",
"steam_tier": "B"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 20.8,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "malaga",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Malaga",
"away_team_id": 535,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/535.webp",
"away_team_name": "Malaga",
"away_team_public_id": "5M2r3y26sZK0x4",
"away_team_slug": "malaga",
"country_code": "ES",
"country_display_name": "Spain",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/es.svg",
"country_id": 145,
"country_name": "Spain",
"fixture_id": 1570398,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Spain",
"home_team_display_name": "Getafe",
"home_team_id": 546,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/546.webp",
"home_team_name": "Getafe",
"home_team_public_id": "0zGRTb63UpwLKh",
"home_team_slug": "getafe",
"ht.home_team_slug": "getafe",
"league_country": "Spain",
"league_country_display": "Spain",
"league_display_name": "La Liga",
"league_id": 140,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/140.webp",
"league_name": "La Liga",
"league_public_id": "49oABHuePA7Q7M",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-20 12:00:00",
"public_id": "2vpNX2NK7q4ziQ",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Getafe",
"venue_name": "Coliseum Alfonso P\u00e9rez"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev",
"pred_conf_md_draw_above_30"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)",
"Draw probability above 30% (\u22120.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.1427,
"best_odd": 4.62,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0273,
"ev": 0.0974,
"implied_prob": 0.2103,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2103,
"draw": 0.3064,
"home": 0.4833
},
"model_prob": 0.4013,
"p_final": 0.2375
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2924,
"best_odd": 3.17,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.005,
"ev": -0.0129,
"implied_prob": 0.3064,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2103,
"draw": 0.3064,
"home": 0.4833
},
"model_prob": 0.3234,
"p_final": 0.3114
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.3096,
"best_odd": 2.01,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0644,
"ev": -0.158,
"implied_prob": 0.4833,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2103,
"draw": 0.3064,
"home": 0.4833
},
"model_prob": 0.2753,
"p_final": 0.4189
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 4.62,
"edge": 0.1849,
"ev": 0.8541,
"implied_prob": 0.2165,
"model_prob": 0.4013
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.17,
"edge": 0.0079,
"ev": 0.0252,
"implied_prob": 0.3155,
"model_prob": 0.3234
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 2.01,
"edge": -0.2222,
"ev": -0.4467,
"implied_prob": 0.4975,
"model_prob": 0.2753
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.37,
"alpha_yes": 0.3363,
"best_no_odd": 1.67,
"best_yes_odd": 2.25,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": -0.0272,
"edge_yes": 0.0272,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.0898,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.0933,
"ev_yes": 0.0237,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0589,
"implied_no": 0.5722,
"implied_yes": 0.4278,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.37,
"best_odd": 1.615,
"edge": -0.0096,
"ev": -0.0933,
"implied_prob": 0.571,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5614
},
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.3363,
"best_odd": 2.15,
"edge": 0.0088,
"ev": -0.0589,
"implied_prob": 0.429,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4377
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"p_final_no": 0.5614,
"p_final_yes": 0.4377,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.2741,
"alpha_under": 0.3769,
"best_over_odd": 2.75,
"best_under_odd": 1.52,
"consensus_over_odd": 2.585,
"consensus_under_odd": 1.46,
"edge_over": 0.012,
"edge_under": -0.012,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.0312,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.057,
"ev_under": -0.05,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.0747,
"implied_over": 0.363,
"implied_over_mf": 0.3609,
"implied_under": 0.637,
"implied_under_mf": 0.6391,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2741,
"best_odd": 2.585,
"edge": 0.0039,
"ev": -0.057,
"implied_prob": 0.3609,
"model_prob": 0.375,
"p_final": 0.3648
},
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.3769,
"best_odd": 1.46,
"edge": -0.0053,
"ev": -0.0747,
"implied_prob": 0.6391,
"model_prob": 0.625,
"p_final": 0.6338
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.3648,
"p_final_under": 0.6338,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.19,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0974,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.8541,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.0974,
"confidence": 5.0,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_draw_above_30",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Draw probability above 30% (\u22120.5)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV"
],
"guard_capped": true,
"score": 3.0,
"score_before_guard": 5.0,
"score_v1_legacy": 3.0,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.0,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_pre_penalty": 3.0
},
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "B",
"stake_factor": 0.5
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "wait",
"final_decision": {
"action": "wait",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 20.8,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 20.8,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Malaga, but the model still strongly favours Malaga."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0974,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.8541,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 16,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Malaga at 40.1%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 21.0%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Malaga as the value side (40.1%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 19.1,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u23f8",
"label": "Wait for validation",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Malaga, but the model still strongly favours Malaga.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Malaga",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Malaga \u00b7 decimal odds ~4.62 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +85% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1570398 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22484.62 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +9.7% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +9.7% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +9.7% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +9.7% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "56 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "16 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+9.7% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": false,
"value": "false"
}
],
"passed": 4,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Malaga, but the model still strongly favours Malaga.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +85% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 56,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV"
],
"subline": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "wait",
"validation_ok": false,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0974,
"consensus_ev_display": "+9.7%",
"consensus_odds": 4.62,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.2103,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4013,
"raw_edge_display": "+19.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 19.1,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.21645021645021645,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.854,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+85.4%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -9.6,
"reasons": [],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "ok",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 0,
"strength_delta": 0.0,
"xg_gap": 0.25
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u672a\u5206\u578b",
"scoring_type": "neutral",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.455,
"draw_prob": 0.3234,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.4013,
"over_prob": 0.375,
"total_xg": 2.19,
"under_prob": 0.625,
"xg_diff": 0.25
},
"type": "neutral",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"guard_active": true,
"guard_level": "extreme",
"guard_message": "Model validation failed \u2014 value signals on 1X2 are not actionable until inputs are verified.",
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 4.62,
"decision": "guard_blocked",
"decision_before_guard": "value_bet",
"edge": 0.0273,
"ev": 0.0974,
"guard_blocked": true,
"implied_prob": 0.2103,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.4013,
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Malaga"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "guard_blocked",
"decision_before_guard": "small_edge",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.3363,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.15,
"edge": 0.0088,
"market_prob": 0.429,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.37,
"best_odd": 1.615,
"edge": -0.0096,
"ev": -0.0933,
"implied_prob": 0.571,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5614
},
"p_final": 0.4377,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0589,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.3363,
"best_odd": 2.15,
"edge": 0.0088,
"ev": -0.0589,
"implied_prob": 0.429,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.4377
}
},
"edge": 0.0272,
"ev": 0.0237,
"guard_blocked": true,
"implied_prob": 0.4278,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"side": "yes",
"value_side": "yes"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "guard_blocked",
"decision_before_guard": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2741,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.585,
"edge": 0.0039,
"market_prob": 0.3609,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.375,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2741,
"best_odd": 2.585,
"edge": 0.0039,
"ev": -0.057,
"implied_prob": 0.3609,
"model_prob": 0.375,
"p_final": 0.3648
},
"p_final": 0.3648,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.057,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.3769,
"best_odd": 1.46,
"edge": -0.0053,
"ev": -0.0747,
"implied_prob": 0.6391,
"model_prob": 0.625,
"p_final": 0.6338
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"edge": 0.012,
"ev": 0.0312,
"guard_blocked": true,
"implied_prob": 0.363,
"model_prob": 0.375,
"side": "over",
"value_side": "over"
}
},
"match_id": 1570398,
"match_regime": {
"action": "optional",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": false,
"code": "thin_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.0974,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 0.25,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.4013,
"draw": 0.3234,
"home": 0.2753
},
"reason_codes": [
"model_summary"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Malaga",
"home": "Getafe"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.039087,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0974,
"implied_prob": 0.2103,
"market": "1x2",
"model_prob": 0.4013,
"not_dominant": true,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Malaga",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 3,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0974,
"consensus_ev_display": "+9.7%",
"consensus_odds": 4.62,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.2103,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4013,
"raw_edge_display": "+19.1 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 19.1,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.21645021645021645,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.854,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+85.4%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1570398,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-20T12:01:11.481712+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Terokai Kandungan Ramalan Lain
Dapatkan Ramalan Premium untuk Getafe & Malaga!
Buka analisis mendalam, tip pertaruhan eksklusif, dan ramalan perlawanan dengan perkhidmatan langganan premium kami.
Langgan Sekarang
La Liga — Kedudukan
| # | PASUKAN | P | M | S | K | Mata |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barcelona | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 21 |
| 2 | Atletico Madrid | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 16 |
| 3 | Real Betis | 7 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 16 |
| 4 | Real Madrid | 7 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 15 |
| 5 | Sevilla | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 13 |
| 6 | Alaves | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 11 |
| 7 | Deportivo La Coruña | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 10 |
| 8 | Real Sociedad | 7 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 10 |
| 9 | Villarreal | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 10 | Athletic Club | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| 11 | Getafe | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 12 | Rayo Vallecano | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 13 | Osasuna | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 14 | Celta Vigo | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 |
| 15 | Espanyol | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| 16 | Racing Santander | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| 17 | Levante | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 18 | Elche | 7 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 5 |
| 19 | Valencia | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| 20 | Malaga | 7 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| # | PASUKAN | P | J | B | +/- | Mata |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barcelona | 7 | 31 | 7 | +24 | 21 |
| 2 | Real Madrid | 7 | 18 | 8 | +10 | 15 |
| 3 | Atletico Madrid | 7 | 16 | 7 | +9 | 16 |
| 4 | Villarreal | 7 | 13 | 12 | +1 | 8 |
| 5 | Alaves | 7 | 11 | 6 | +5 | 11 |
| 6 | Rayo Vallecano | 7 | 11 | 16 | -5 | 8 |
| 7 | Elche | 7 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 5 |
| 8 | Racing Santander | 7 | 11 | 21 | -10 | 7 |
| 9 | Deportivo La Coruña | 7 | 10 | 8 | +2 | 10 |
| 10 | Sevilla | 7 | 10 | 9 | +1 | 13 |
| 11 | Espanyol | 7 | 10 | 10 | 0 | 7 |
| 12 | Real Betis | 7 | 9 | 7 | +2 | 16 |
| 13 | Real Sociedad | 7 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 10 |
| 14 | Celta Vigo | 7 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 7 |
| 15 | Levante | 6 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 5 |
| 16 | Athletic Club | 6 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 8 |
| 17 | Osasuna | 7 | 6 | 13 | -7 | 8 |
| 18 | Getafe | 7 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 8 |
| 19 | Valencia | 7 | 4 | 13 | -9 | 4 |
| 20 | Malaga | 7 | 3 | 12 | -9 | 3 |
| # | PASUKAN | P | xG | xGC | +/- | Mata |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Barcelona | 7 | 14.9 | 2.7 | +12.2 | 21 |
| 2 | Real Madrid | 7 | 5.7 | 1.8 | +3.9 | 15 |
| 3 | Osasuna | 7 | 6.7 | 3.3 | +3.4 | 8 |
| 4 | Alaves | 7 | 5.8 | 3.6 | +2.2 | 11 |
| 5 | Racing Santander | 7 | 4.5 | 3.1 | +1.4 | 7 |
| 6 | Villarreal | 7 | 7.6 | 7.0 | +0.6 | 8 |
| 7 | Espanyol | 7 | 2.8 | 2.2 | +0.6 | 7 |
| 8 | Real Betis | 7 | 7.2 | 7.4 | -0.2 | 16 |
| 9 | Levante | 6 | 5.4 | 5.7 | -0.3 | 5 |
| 10 | Sevilla | 7 | 3.7 | 4.2 | -0.5 | 13 |
| 11 | Malaga | 7 | 4.3 | 5.1 | -0.8 | 3 |
| 12 | Athletic Club | 6 | 4.1 | 4.9 | -0.8 | 8 |
| 13 | Real Sociedad | 7 | 3.6 | 5.0 | -1.4 | 10 |
| 14 | Deportivo La Coruña | 7 | 2.9 | 4.7 | -1.8 | 10 |
| 15 | Atletico Madrid | 7 | 2.5 | 4.7 | -2.2 | 16 |
| 16 | Elche | 7 | 3.2 | 6.0 | -2.8 | 5 |
| 17 | Getafe | 7 | 2.8 | 5.6 | -2.8 | 8 |
| 18 | Valencia | 7 | 3.7 | 6.9 | -3.2 | 4 |
| 19 | Rayo Vallecano | 7 | 3.5 | 7.0 | -3.5 | 8 |
| 20 | Celta Vigo | 7 | 2.4 | 6.5 | -4.1 | 7 |