AI correctly predicted the Universitatea Cluj win.
The match finished 2–1, validating the model's directional assessment.
Pasaran yang dijejaki vs hasil sepenuh masa
Setiap baris membandingkan model pra-perlawanan lean dengan keputusan sepenuh masa.
- Pasaran Ramalan Hasilnya Hasil
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 matlamat) ✖ tak betul
- Kedua-dua Pasukan Menjaringkan Gol BTTS Ya Ya ✔ Betul
- 1X2 Universitatea Cluj Universitatea Cluj ✔ Betul
- Cerapan skor tepat 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 0-0, 2-1 2-1 ✔ Betul
Model lwn Pasaran Penutup
| Hasil | Model | Menutup Pasaran | Perbezaan | isyarat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Universitatea Cluj | 38.5% | 48.5% | -10.1 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 30.8% | 27.1% | +3.7 pp | Aligned |
| UTA Arad | 30.7% | 24.4% | +6.4 pp | Model Higher |
The closing market estimates Universitatea Cluj's win probability at 48.5%, compared with the model's estimate of 38.5%, a difference of 10.1 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
Selepas sepenuh masa, lean arah model sepadan dengan keputusan (Universitatea Cluj win 2–1).
Market Assessment
The market is materially more optimistic about Universitatea Cluj than the current fair estimate.
- Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
- Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
- Exact score 2–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins
What failed
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (3 goals)
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Universitatea Cluj higher (48.5% vs model 38.5%, 10.1 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Universitatea Cluj win 2–1).
Garis Masa Ramalan
Cara ramalan ini beralih daripada ramalan kepada semakan sepenuh masa.
-
Aug 17, 2026 · 19:08 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Universitatea Cluj 38.5% · Draw 30.8% · UTA Arad 30.8%
- xG · Universitatea Cluj 1.29 — UTA Arad 1.13
-
Aug 17, 2026 · 15:00 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Universitatea Cluj 1.96 · Draw 3.51 · UTA Arad 3.90
- Implied 1X2 · Universitatea Cluj 48.5% · Draw 27.1% · UTA Arad 24.4%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 17, 2026 · 15:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Universitatea Cluj 1.96 · Draw 3.51 · UTA Arad 3.90
- Implied 1X2 · Universitatea Cluj 48.5% · Draw 27.1% · UTA Arad 24.4%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 17, 2026 · 15:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Universitatea Cluj win · 2–1
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Gambar Sejarah
Dibekukan pada sepak mula — keluaran model seperti sebelum perlawanan bermula.
Metrik pra-padanan (konteks sejarah)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (10 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Market has already priced much of the edge
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Semakan Soalan Lazim
- Sejauh manakah ramalan itu tepat?
- Halaman ini menilai pasaran berarah (1X2, Lebih/Bawah 2.5, BTTS) berbanding keputusan sepenuh masa. Gred ramalan menggambarkan bilangan pasaran yang dijejaki itu sepadan dengan realiti.
- Apakah ukuran Ketepatan xG?
- Ketepatan xG membandingkan profil matlamat jangkaan pra-perlawanan model dengan garis skor sebenar — bukan sama ada setiap pasaran mencecah. Semakan arah yang kukuh boleh wujud bersama dengan skor ketepatan xG yang sederhana.
- Mengapakah skor tepat tidak diramalkan?
- Hasil skor betul ialah ekor berkemungkinan rendah walaupun model membaca profil padanan dengan baik. Kami menyerlahkan tong skor tertinggi untuk konteks; kehilangan baris tepat tidak membatalkan semakan arah.
- Adakah ini meningkatkan rekod AI?
- Setiap perlawanan selesai dilog masuk dalam saluran paip pengesahan kami. Kadar hit teragregat dan kajian CLV diterbitkan secara berasingan — halaman ini ialah jejak audit setiap perlawanan.
Ramalan adalah untuk tujuan maklumat sahaja. Sentiasa berjudi dengan penuh tanggungjawab dan dalam had anda. Prestasi masa lalu tidak menjamin hasil masa depan.
Terokai Kandungan Ramalan Lain
Dapatkan Ramalan Premium untuk Universitatea Cluj & UTA Arad!
Buka analisis mendalam, tip pertaruhan eksklusif, dan ramalan perlawanan dengan perkhidmatan langganan premium kami.
Langgan Sekarang
Liga I Romania — Kedudukan
| # | PASUKAN | P | M | S | K | Mata |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dinamo Bucuresti | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 20 |
| 2 | Rapid | 9 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 18 |
| 3 | Universitatea Craiova | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 17 |
| 4 | Petrolul Ploieşti | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 15 |
| 5 | Farul Constanța | 9 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 14 |
| 6 | Sepsi OSK Sfântu Gheorghe | 9 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 13 |
| 7 | FC Botoșani | 9 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 11 |
| 8 | FCSB | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| 9 | Arges Pitesti | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 11 |
| 10 | Corvinul Hunedoara | 9 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 10 |
| 11 | Oţelul | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 10 |
| 12 | CFR 1907 Cluj | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 10 |
| 13 | UTA Arad | 9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 14 | Universitatea Cluj | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 9 |
| 15 | FC Voluntari | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| 16 | Csikszereda | 9 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 |
| # | PASUKAN | P | J | B | +/- | Mata |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dinamo Bucuresti | 9 | 19 | 7 | +12 | 20 |
| 2 | Universitatea Craiova | 9 | 19 | 9 | +10 | 17 |
| 3 | Farul Constanța | 9 | 14 | 10 | +4 | 14 |
| 4 | FC Botoșani | 9 | 13 | 9 | +4 | 11 |
| 5 | UTA Arad | 9 | 13 | 15 | -2 | 9 |
| 6 | CFR 1907 Cluj | 8 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 10 |
| 7 | Rapid | 9 | 11 | 5 | +6 | 18 |
| 8 | FCSB | 8 | 11 | 10 | +1 | 11 |
| 9 | Oţelul | 8 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 10 |
| 10 | Petrolul Ploieşti | 8 | 9 | 10 | -1 | 15 |
| 11 | Universitatea Cluj | 7 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 9 |
| 12 | FC Voluntari | 9 | 9 | 20 | -11 | 8 |
| 13 | Corvinul Hunedoara | 9 | 8 | 7 | +1 | 10 |
| 14 | Sepsi OSK Sfântu Gheorghe | 9 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 13 |
| 15 | Csikszereda | 9 | 6 | 21 | -15 | 1 |
| 16 | Arges Pitesti | 9 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 11 |
| # | PASUKAN | P | xG | xGC | +/- | Mata |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rapid | 9 | 4.0 | 1.6 | +2.4 | 18 |
| 2 | Farul Constanța | 9 | 1.7 | 1.0 | +0.7 | 14 |
| 3 | Dinamo Bucuresti | 9 | 3.6 | 3.0 | +0.6 | 20 |
| 4 | FCSB | 8 | 1.9 | 1.4 | +0.5 | 11 |
| 5 | FC Voluntari | 9 | 2.9 | 2.6 | +0.3 | 8 |
| 6 | Csikszereda | 9 | 1.3 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 1 |
| 7 | FC Botoșani | 9 | 2.6 | 2.9 | -0.3 | 11 |
| 8 | Arges Pitesti | 9 | 1.4 | 1.9 | -0.5 | 11 |
| 9 | Universitatea Cluj | 7 | 1.0 | 1.7 | -0.7 | 9 |
| 10 | Petrolul Ploieşti | 8 | 1.4 | 2.2 | -0.8 | 15 |
| 11 | Sepsi OSK Sfântu Gheorghe | 9 | 1.4 | 3.6 | -2.2 | 13 |
| 12 | Universitatea Craiova | 9 | — | — | — | 17 |
| 13 | Corvinul Hunedoara | 9 | — | — | — | 10 |
| 14 | Oţelul | 8 | — | — | — | 10 |
| 15 | CFR 1907 Cluj | 8 | — | — | — | 10 |
| 16 | UTA Arad | 9 | — | — | — | 9 |