AI correctly predicted the Machida Zelvia win.
The match finished 2–1, validating the model's directional assessment.
Pasaran yang dijejaki vs hasil sepenuh masa
Gred ramalan
A
Setiap baris membandingkan model pra-perlawanan lean dengan keputusan sepenuh masa.
- Pasaran Ramalan Hasilnya Hasil
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 matlamat) ✔ Betul
- Kedua-dua Pasukan Menjaringkan Gol BTTS Ya Ya ✔ Betul
- 1X2 Machida Zelvia Machida Zelvia ✔ Betul
- Cerapan skor tepat 1-1, 2-1, 1-2, 1-0, 0-1 2-1 ✔ Betul
Model lwn Pasaran Penutup
| Hasil | Model | Menutup Pasaran | Perbezaan | isyarat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Machida Zelvia | 36.7% | 48.3% | -11.6 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 27.6% | 26.6% | +0.9 pp | Aligned |
| Kawasaki Frontale | 35.8% | 25.1% | +10.7 pp | Model Edge |
The closing market estimates Machida Zelvia's win probability at 48.3%, compared with the model's estimate of 36.7%, a difference of 11.6 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
Selepas sepenuh masa, lean arah model sepadan dengan keputusan (Machida Zelvia win 2–1).
Market Assessment
The market is materially more optimistic about Machida Zelvia than the current fair estimate.
- Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
- Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.94) — 3 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
- Over 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Machida Zelvia higher (48.3% vs model 36.7%, 11.6 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Machida Zelvia win 2–1).
Laman pertaruhan premium stake: pengguna baharu boleh guna kod promo FHn2uDc1. Daftar sekarang
Garis Masa Ramalan
Cara ramalan ini beralih daripada ramalan kepada semakan sepenuh masa.
-
Sep 02, 2026 · 09:59 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Machida Zelvia 36.6% · Draw 27.5% · Kawasaki Frontale 35.8%
- xG · Machida Zelvia 1.48 — Kawasaki Frontale 1.46
-
Sep 02, 2026 · 09:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Machida Zelvia 1.90 · Draw 3.80 · Kawasaki Frontale 4.05
- Implied 1X2 · Machida Zelvia 50.8% · Draw 25.4% · Kawasaki Frontale 23.8%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 02, 2026 · 09:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Machida Zelvia 2.00 · Draw 3.63 · Kawasaki Frontale 3.85
- Implied 1X2 · Machida Zelvia 48.3% · Draw 26.6% · Kawasaki Frontale 25.1%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 02, 2026 · 10:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Machida Zelvia win · 2–1
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Gambar Sejarah
Dibekukan pada sepak mula — keluaran model seperti sebelum perlawanan bermula.
Keputusan sejarah:
Monitor
Keputusan Sejarah
Monitor
Hasil
Validated
Metrik pra-padanan (konteks sejarah)
Kebolehpercayaan Ramalan
57/100
· Moderate
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (12 pp)
Bukti
★★★★★
- No strong statistical edge
- Market has already priced much of the edge
- Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap)
41/100
Betting Confidence
45/100
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
2.0
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
Pending
Final Result
Machida Zelvia win · Machida Zelvia 2–1 Kawasaki Frontale
Prediction
✔ Correct
Decision Grade
A
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Semakan Soalan Lazim
- Sejauh manakah ramalan itu tepat?
- Halaman ini menilai pasaran berarah (1X2, Lebih/Bawah 2.5, BTTS) berbanding keputusan sepenuh masa. Gred ramalan menggambarkan bilangan pasaran yang dijejaki itu sepadan dengan realiti.
- Apakah ukuran Ketepatan xG?
- Ketepatan xG membandingkan profil matlamat jangkaan pra-perlawanan model dengan garis skor sebenar — bukan sama ada setiap pasaran mencecah. Semakan arah yang kukuh boleh wujud bersama dengan skor ketepatan xG yang sederhana.
- Mengapakah skor tepat tidak diramalkan?
- Hasil skor betul ialah ekor berkemungkinan rendah walaupun model membaca profil padanan dengan baik. Kami menyerlahkan tong skor tertinggi untuk konteks; kehilangan baris tepat tidak membatalkan semakan arah.
- Adakah ini meningkatkan rekod AI?
- Setiap perlawanan selesai dilog masuk dalam saluran paip pengesahan kami. Kadar hit teragregat dan kajian CLV diterbitkan secara berasingan — halaman ini ialah jejak audit setiap perlawanan.
Ramalan adalah untuk tujuan maklumat sahaja. Sentiasa berjudi dengan penuh tanggungjawab dan dalam had anda. Prestasi masa lalu tidak menjamin hasil masa depan.
Taklimat AI untuk perlawanan ini belum tersedia. Selepas naik taraf pelayan, jalankan semula “Batch generate odds” untuk menjana ringkasan.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "19d7ca04ae03e3d696cf1275c41aa5f44e8b26b706c723838eebd8f687a0f50b",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.46,
"away_win_prob": 0.3578,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.392,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.608,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2755,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.79,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.63,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.73,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.48,
"home_win_prob": 0.3667,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.563,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"under_25_prob": 0.437
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Winner : Machida Zelvia",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "10%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "45%",
"winner_name": "Machida Zelvia"
},
"away_xg": 1.46,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Machida Zelvia",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": -0.1168,
"edge_gap": 0.0079,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.483,
"model_prob": 0.3662,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 35.8,
"draw": 27.5,
"home": 36.6
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 2.0
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 2.0,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Machida Zelvia Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Home",
"market_fair_odds": 2.07,
"market_odds": 2.0,
"model_odds": 2.73,
"overround": 3.5,
"prob_edge": -13.4,
"value_pct": -26.7,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 0,
"away_failed_to_score": 0,
"away_played": 3,
"away_score_rate": 76.8,
"home_clean_sheet": 1,
"home_failed_to_score": 0,
"home_played": 3,
"home_score_rate": 77.2,
"no_prob": 39.2,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 60.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"yes_prob": 60.8
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.46,
"home_expected": 1.48,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 11.4
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.5
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.3
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 7.8
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 7.7
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Machida Zelvia or Draw",
"prob": 64.3
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Machida Zelvia or Kawasaki Frontale",
"prob": 72.5
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Kawasaki Frontale",
"prob": 63.4
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Machida Zelvia or Kawasaki Frontale",
"pick_prob": 72.5
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 35.8,
"draw_pct": 27.6,
"home_pct": 36.7,
"lean_key": "home",
"lean_label": "Machida Zelvia"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 2.94,
"away_avg_scored": 1.3,
"confidence": "medium",
"home_avg_scored": 4.0,
"over_prob": 56.3,
"pick": "Over 2.5",
"pick_prob": 56.3,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"total_expected": 2.94,
"under_prob": 43.7
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 37.8,
"implied_prob": 26.0,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Kawasaki Frontale Win",
"model_prob": 35.8,
"odds": 3.85
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Kawasaki Frontale",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 25.09,
"draw": 26.61,
"home": 48.3
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-02 09:59:29",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-02 09:29:42",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Machida Zelvia",
"largest_move_kind": "1x2_h",
"max_abs_move_pp": 2.48,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 48.3,
"gap_pp": -11.68,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 36.62
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 26.61,
"gap_pp": 0.93,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 27.54
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 25.09,
"gap_pp": 10.74,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 35.83
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 52.84,
"gap_pp": 3.46,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 56.3
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 47.16,
"gap_pp": -3.46,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 43.7
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 2.0,
"early": 1.9,
"implied_closing_pct": 48.3,
"implied_delta_pp": -2.48,
"implied_early_pct": 50.78,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.63,
"early": 3.8,
"implied_closing_pct": 26.61,
"implied_delta_pp": 1.22,
"implied_early_pct": 25.39,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 3.85,
"early": 4.05,
"implied_closing_pct": 25.09,
"implied_delta_pp": 1.27,
"implied_early_pct": 23.82,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.83,
"early": 1.79,
"implied_closing_pct": 52.84,
"implied_delta_pp": -1.27,
"implied_early_pct": 54.1,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 2.05,
"early": 2.11,
"implied_closing_pct": 47.16,
"implied_delta_pp": 1.27,
"implied_early_pct": 45.9,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": false,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 10.7,
"kind": "1x2_a"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -2.9,
"ev": -0.202,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 7.0,
"market_prob": 0.1429,
"market_prob_pct": 14.3,
"model_prob": 0.114,
"model_prob_pct": 11.4,
"n_bookmakers": 10,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 11.4
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 11.4
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.5
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.3
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 7.8
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 7.7
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.48,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"authority_action": "monitor",
"authority_note": "Validation pending \u2014 monitor the line before acting.",
"consensus_odds": 2.0,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": -0.1207,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -12.1,
"text": "-12.1%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.483,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": 0.0701,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 7.0,
"text": "+7.0%"
},
"model_prob": 0.3662,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.7,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2676,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-26.8%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Machida Zelvia",
"sort_key": 5406.08,
"tier": "lean"
},
{
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"ev_available": false,
"ev_over": null,
"ev_over_display": null,
"ev_under": null,
"ev_under_display": null,
"featured": false,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": null,
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"over_prob": 56.3,
"sort_key": 4050.0,
"tier": "lean",
"under_prob": 43.7,
"value_side": "over"
},
{
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"ev_available": false,
"ev_no": null,
"ev_no_display": null,
"ev_yes": null,
"ev_yes_display": null,
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": null,
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"no_prob": 39.2,
"sort_key": 4050.0,
"tier": "lean",
"value_side": "yes",
"yes_prob": 60.8
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 814.2,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 11.4
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "6/13",
"alert_breadth_note": "6/13 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2191 +6.1%",
"alert_team": "Draw",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 11.6,
"has_alert": false,
"hero_edge_pp": -11.63,
"hero_label": "Machida Zelvia",
"market_prob_pct": 48.3,
"market_team": "Machida Zelvia",
"model_prob_pct": 36.7,
"model_team": "Machida Zelvia",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "!",
"status_key": "caution",
"status_label": "Use caution",
"status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
"steam_score": 35,
"steam_subtitle": "Limited conviction",
"steam_tier": "C",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "market_disagree",
"read_min": 5,
"title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
"url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 11.7,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.7,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Machida Zelvia)."
},
"authority": {
"action": "monitor",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 11.7,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.7,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Machida Zelvia)."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0701,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3796,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.9,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 5.9,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 52,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Monitor - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Machida Zelvia at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 48.3%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Machida Zelvia as the value side (36.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 11.7,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Monitor - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\ud83d\udc41",
"label": "Monitor \u2014 validate before acting",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Machida Zelvia",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Kawasaki Frontale \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.85 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +38% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1556044 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.85 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +7.0% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +7.0% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +7.0% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.9/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +7.0% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.9/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "65 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "52 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+7.0% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 7,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Machida Zelvia).",
"Decision strength: 3.9/10",
"Execution confidence below 65",
"Outlier price +38% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 65,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Validation pending \u2014 monitor the line before acting.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "monitor",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1207,
"consensus_ev_display": "-12.1%",
"consensus_odds": 2.0,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.483,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3662,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2676,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-26.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 9.6,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.02 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.02
}
}
},
"bet_status": "monitor",
"books_breadth_display": "6/13",
"breadth_ratio": 0.46153846153846156,
"evidence": {
"score": 68,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift supports model side (direction only \u2014 not pricing convergence)",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation warning",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Warning",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "gap",
"label": "Large market gap (12 pp)",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift aligns with model",
"tone": "ok"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 19.2,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 4.6,
"steam_coherence": 10.0,
"validation": 14.0
},
"score": 65,
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 11.63,
"market_agreement": "weak",
"max_gap_pp": 11.63,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.46,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 10.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.48,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.48,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.48 \u00b7 Away xG 1.46 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +10%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": true,
"mv_status": "warning",
"odds_delta_pct": 6.1,
"steam_conflicts": false,
"steam_move_display": "\u2191 +6.1%",
"steam_team": "Draw",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 52,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 41,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 41,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "monitor",
"label": "Monitor - No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "Validation pending \u2014 monitor the line before acting.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 11.7,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.7,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Machida Zelvia)."
},
"authority": {
"action": "monitor",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 11.7,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.7,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Machida Zelvia)."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0701,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3796,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.9,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 5.9,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 52,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Monitor - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Machida Zelvia at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 48.3%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Machida Zelvia as the value side (36.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 11.7,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Monitor - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\ud83d\udc41",
"label": "Monitor \u2014 validate before acting",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Machida Zelvia",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Kawasaki Frontale \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.85 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +38% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1556044 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.85 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +7.0% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +7.0% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +7.0% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.9/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +7.0% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.9/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "65 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "52 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+7.0% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 7,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Machida Zelvia).",
"Decision strength: 3.9/10",
"Execution confidence below 65",
"Outlier price +38% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 65,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Validation pending \u2014 monitor the line before acting.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "monitor",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1207,
"consensus_ev_display": "-12.1%",
"consensus_odds": 2.0,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.483,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3662,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2676,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-26.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 9.6,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.02 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.02
}
}
},
"headline": "Monitor - No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\ud83d\udc41",
"label": "Monitor \u2014 validate before acting",
"subline": "Validation pending \u2014 monitor the line before acting.",
"tier": "monitor"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Machida Zelvia 1.48 xG vs Kawasaki Frontale 1.46 \u2192 Machida Zelvia 36.7%",
"Market: Machida Zelvia ~48.3% implied",
"Market Drift: Draw odds \u2191 +6.1%"
],
"one_liner": "Model and market both lean Machida Zelvia with no major conflict.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -11.63,
"fair_prob": 36.67,
"label": "Machida Zelvia",
"market_prob": 48.3,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 0.94,
"fair_prob": 27.55,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 26.61,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 10.69,
"fair_prob": 35.78,
"label": "Kawasaki Frontale",
"market_prob": 25.09,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 56.3,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 43.7,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 60.8,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 39.2,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -11.63,
"fair_prob_pct": 36.67,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "Machida Zelvia",
"market_prob_pct": 48.3,
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "Draw"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Machida Zelvia\u0027s win probability at 48.3%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 36.7%, a difference of 11.6 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "strong",
"edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 11.63,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "strong",
"divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
"divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
"divergence_tier": "strong",
"edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Machida Zelvia",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Supports model direction",
"positive": true
},
"market_prob_pct": 48.3,
"model_prob_gap_display": "-11.6 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": -11.6,
"model_prob_pct": 36.7,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "-11.6 percentage points",
"gap_pp": -11.6,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Moderate reliability",
"reliability_icon": "\u2713",
"reliability_score": 65,
"reliability_tier": "moderate",
"summary": "Machida Zelvia \u2014 market direction supports the model lean.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Warning",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 52,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 41,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 41,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "monitor",
"label": "Monitor - No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Machida Zelvia 1.48 xG vs Kawasaki Frontale 1.46 \u2192 Machida Zelvia 36.7%",
"Market: Machida Zelvia ~48.3% implied",
"Market Drift: Draw odds \u2191 +6.1%"
],
"one_liner": "Model and market both lean Machida Zelvia with no major conflict.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -11.63,
"hero_label": "Machida Zelvia",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "Draw odds lengthened \u2191 +6.1%.",
"market_agreement": "weak",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.",
"Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing."
],
"follow_up": "However, Draw has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 6.1%, suggesting weakening support. Confirmation remains limited (6/13 books), suggesting early interest rather than a broad market move.",
"gap_tier": "strong",
"lead": "The market is materially more optimistic about Machida Zelvia than the current fair estimate.",
"note": "Drift away from Draw \u2014 odds lengthened by 6.1% (weakening support).",
"paragraphs": [
"The market is materially more optimistic about Machida Zelvia than the current fair estimate.",
"However, Draw has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 6.1%, suggesting weakening support. Confirmation remains limited (6/13 books), suggesting early interest rather than a broad market move.",
"Drift away from Draw \u2014 odds lengthened by 6.1% (weakening support)."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The market favors Machida Zelvia more strongly than the current fair estimate.",
"At the same time, Draw has drifted \u2014 odds lengthened by 6.1%, suggesting weakening support.",
"Market confirmation remains limited (6/13), suggesting an early move rather than a broad consensus."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 11.63,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
"status": "warning"
},
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Top two 1X2 outcomes within 0.9 percentage points."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 0.9,
"max_prob_pct": 36.7,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "strong",
"largest_gap_label": "Machida Zelvia",
"largest_gap_pp": -11.6,
"lead": "The closing market prices Machida Zelvia higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 11.6,
"title": "Strong Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -11.63,
"edge_pp": -11.63,
"fair_prob_pct": 36.67,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Machida Zelvia",
"market_prob_pct": 48.3,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 0.94,
"edge_pp": 0.94,
"fair_prob_pct": 27.55,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 26.61,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 10.69,
"edge_pp": 10.69,
"fair_prob_pct": 35.78,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Kawasaki Frontale",
"market_prob_pct": 25.09,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "model_edge",
"signal_label": "Model Edge"
}
],
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "Drift away from Draw \u2014 odds lengthened by 6.1% (weakening support).",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": false,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Machida Zelvia (48.3%).",
"Draw odds have drifted longer across books (\u2191 +6.1%, 6/13) \u2014 market pricing moves against this side.",
"Machida Zelvia \u2014 market direction supports the model lean."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 50.0,
"closing_odds": 2.0,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 50.0,
"entry_odds": 2.0,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"model_validation_status": "warning",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 6,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 36,
"bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +7.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 7.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +6.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 6.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 7,
"bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +6.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 6.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 4,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +5.8%",
"odds_delta_pct": 5.8
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 34,
"bookmaker_name": "Superbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +4.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": 4.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.8%",
"odds_delta_pct": 2.8
}
],
"books_total": 13,
"breadth_display": "6/13",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 3.5,
"is_drift": true,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2191 +6.1%",
"move_pct_abs": 6.1,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 53h 31m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"Volatile two-way pricing on Draw (swing 3.80 \u2192 3.18 \u2192 3.50) \u2014 net 6.1% but intraday chop is elevated.",
"Price swings look choppy \u2014 volatility reduced overall confidence in the directional signal."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": 6.1,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"3.80",
"3.55",
"3.30"
],
"display": "3.80 \u2192 3.18 \u2192 3.50",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 53h 31m",
"pick_team": "Draw",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.80"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "3.18"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.50"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
3.3,
3.63,
3.8,
3.5
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 18.7,6.1 37.3,0.0 56.0,10.8",
"sparkline_trend": "volatile",
"sparkline_trend_label": "V-shape swing",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.30"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "3.30"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "3.80"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.50"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 3.3,
"page_alert_line": "",
"phase_label": "Volatile",
"phase_tip": "High disagreement or chop \u2014 low reliability for directional bets.",
"pick_team": "Draw",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "",
"sharp_leader": "Bet365",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "warn",
"signal_icon": "\u26a0\ufe0f",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 3.5,
"is_drift": true,
"label": "Market Signal",
"move_display": "\u2191 +6.1%",
"open_odds": 3.3,
"summary": "Broad market drift supports the same direction as the model lean.",
"team": "Draw",
"tone": "with"
},
"signal_key": "volatile_market",
"signal_label": "Volatile market",
"steam_score": 35,
"steam_subtitle": "Limited conviction",
"steam_tier": "C",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "6/13",
"current_odds": 3.5,
"move_display": "\u2191 +6.1%",
"open_odds": 3.3,
"pick_team": "Draw",
"steam_score": 35,
"steam_team_name": "Draw",
"steam_tier": "C"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 11.6,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Kawasaki Frontale",
"away_team_id": 294,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/294.webp",
"away_team_name": "Kawasaki Frontale",
"away_team_public_id": "12nYhiSKcN4EbD",
"away_team_slug": "kawasaki-frontale",
"country_code": "JP",
"country_display_name": "Japan",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/jp.svg",
"country_id": 82,
"country_name": "Japan",
"fixture_id": 1556044,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Japan",
"home_team_display_name": "Machida Zelvia",
"home_team_id": 303,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/303.webp",
"home_team_name": "Machida Zelvia",
"home_team_public_id": "10vmq02oHYiUee",
"home_team_slug": "machida-zelvia",
"league_country": "Japan",
"league_country_display": "Japan",
"league_display_name": "J1 League",
"league_id": 98,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/98.webp",
"league_name": "J1 League",
"league_public_id": "2xJTTSjiNCIcFD",
"league_season": 2027,
"match_date": "2026-09-02 10:00:00",
"public_id": "1OWfpgrBYTTT6Z",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Machida",
"venue_name": "Machida GION Stadium"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.2516,
"best_odd": 3.85,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.027,
"ev": 0.0701,
"implied_prob": 0.2509,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2509,
"draw": 0.2661,
"home": 0.483
},
"model_prob": 0.3583,
"p_final": 0.2779
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2958,
"best_odd": 3.63,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0028,
"ev": -0.024,
"implied_prob": 0.2661,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2509,
"draw": 0.2661,
"home": 0.483
},
"model_prob": 0.2754,
"p_final": 0.2689
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.3712,
"best_odd": 2.0,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0433,
"ev": -0.1207,
"implied_prob": 0.483,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2509,
"draw": 0.2661,
"home": 0.483
},
"model_prob": 0.3662,
"p_final": 0.4396
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 3.85,
"edge": 0.0986,
"ev": 0.3796,
"implied_prob": 0.2597,
"model_prob": 0.3583
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.63,
"edge": -0.0001,
"ev": -0.0002,
"implied_prob": 0.2755,
"model_prob": 0.2754
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 2.0,
"edge": -0.1338,
"ev": -0.2675,
"implied_prob": 0.5,
"model_prob": 0.3662
}
},
"btts": {
"btts_ev_mode": "unavailable",
"ev_available": false,
"market_first": {
"available": false
},
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"reliability": "low"
},
"ou25": {
"ev_available": false,
"market_first": {
"available": false
},
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"ou_ev_mode": "unavailable",
"reliability": "low"
}
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.94,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0701,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3796,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.0701,
"confidence": 5.0,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.9,
"score_v1_legacy": 5.0,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 5.9,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.9,
"score_pre_penalty": 5.9
},
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "B",
"stake_factor": 0.5
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "monitor",
"final_decision": {
"action": "monitor",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 11.7,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.7,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Machida Zelvia)."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0701,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3796,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.9,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 5.9,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 52,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Monitor - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Machida Zelvia at 36.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 48.3%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Machida Zelvia as the value side (36.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 11.7,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Monitor - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\ud83d\udc41",
"label": "Monitor \u2014 validate before acting",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Machida Zelvia",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Kawasaki Frontale \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.85 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +38% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1556044 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.85 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +7.0% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +7.0% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +7.0% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.9/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +7.0% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.9/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "65 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "52 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+7.0% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 7,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Machida Zelvia).",
"Decision strength: 3.9/10",
"Execution confidence below 65",
"Outlier price +38% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 65,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Validation pending \u2014 monitor the line before acting.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "monitor",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1207,
"consensus_ev_display": "-12.1%",
"consensus_odds": 2.0,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.483,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3662,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2676,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-26.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 9.6,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.02 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.02
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5927\u5f00\u5927\u5408\uff08\u8fdb\u7403\u578b\uff09",
"scoring_type": "high_scoring",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.608,
"draw_prob": 0.2754,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.3662,
"over_prob": 0.563,
"total_xg": 2.94,
"under_prob": 0.437,
"xg_diff": 0.02
},
"type": "high_scoring",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 2.0,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": -0.0433,
"ev": -0.1207,
"implied_prob": 0.483,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.3662,
"side": "home",
"side_label": "Machida Zelvia"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"edge": null,
"ev": null,
"implied_prob": null,
"model_prob": 0.608,
"side": "yes",
"value_side": "yes"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"edge": null,
"ev": null,
"implied_prob": null,
"model_prob": 0.563,
"side": "over",
"value_side": "over"
}
},
"match_id": 1556044,
"match_regime": {
"action": "optional",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": false,
"code": "thin_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.0701,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 0.25,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3583,
"draw": 0.2754,
"home": 0.3662
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2",
"high_total_goals"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Kawasaki Frontale",
"home": "Machida Zelvia"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.020093,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0701,
"implied_prob": 0.2509,
"market": "1x2",
"model_prob": 0.3583,
"not_dominant": true,
"primary_strength": "weak",
"risk_band": "speculative",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Kawasaki Frontale",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": true
},
"valid_markets_count": 1,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1207,
"consensus_ev_display": "-12.1%",
"consensus_odds": 2.0,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.483,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3662,
"raw_edge_display": "-11.7 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -11.7,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2676,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-26.8%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1556044,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-02T09:59:31.165613+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Terokai Kandungan Ramalan Lain
Dapatkan Ramalan Premium untuk Machida Zelvia & Kawasaki Frontale!
Buka analisis mendalam, tip pertaruhan eksklusif, dan ramalan perlawanan dengan perkhidmatan langganan premium kami.
Langgan Sekarang
J1 League — Kedudukan
| # | PASUKAN | P | M | S | K | Mata |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vissel Kobe | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 19 |
| 2 | Kashiwa Reysol | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 18 |
| 3 | Sanfrecce Hiroshima | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 17 |
| 4 | Machida Zelvia | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 17 |
| 5 | FC Tokyo | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 17 |
| 6 | Yokohama F. Marinos | 8 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 14 |
| 7 | Kawasaki Frontale | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 13 |
| 8 | Kashima Antlers | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 13 |
| 9 | Fagiano Okayama | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 13 |
| 10 | Urawa Red Diamonds | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 12 |
| 11 | Cerezo Osaka | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| 12 | Shimizu S-Pulse | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 10 |
| 13 | Mito Hollyhock | 8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 14 | Kyoto Sanga | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| 15 | V-Varen Nagasaki | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| 16 | Gamba Osaka | 8 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 6 |
| 17 | Nagoya Grampus | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| 18 | Avispa Fukuoka | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 |
| 19 | Tokyo Verdy | 8 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| 20 | JEF United Chiba | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 |
| # | PASUKAN | P | J | B | +/- | Mata |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Machida Zelvia | 8 | 21 | 10 | +11 | 17 |
| 2 | Sanfrecce Hiroshima | 8 | 20 | 6 | +14 | 17 |
| 3 | Kashiwa Reysol | 8 | 17 | 12 | +5 | 18 |
| 4 | Kashima Antlers | 8 | 17 | 16 | +1 | 13 |
| 5 | Kawasaki Frontale | 8 | 16 | 12 | +4 | 13 |
| 6 | Urawa Red Diamonds | 8 | 16 | 18 | -2 | 12 |
| 7 | FC Tokyo | 8 | 14 | 8 | +6 | 17 |
| 8 | Yokohama F. Marinos | 8 | 13 | 9 | +4 | 14 |
| 9 | Vissel Kobe | 8 | 12 | 5 | +7 | 19 |
| 10 | Fagiano Okayama | 8 | 11 | 10 | +1 | 13 |
| 11 | Mito Hollyhock | 8 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 9 |
| 12 | Kyoto Sanga | 8 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 8 |
| 13 | V-Varen Nagasaki | 8 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 8 |
| 14 | Avispa Fukuoka | 8 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 4 |
| 15 | Gamba Osaka | 8 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 6 |
| 16 | Cerezo Osaka | 8 | 7 | 12 | -5 | 11 |
| 17 | Nagoya Grampus | 8 | 7 | 14 | -7 | 6 |
| 18 | JEF United Chiba | 8 | 7 | 18 | -11 | 4 |
| 19 | Shimizu S-Pulse | 8 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 10 |
| 20 | Tokyo Verdy | 8 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 4 |
| # | PASUKAN | P | xG | xGC | +/- | Mata |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | V-Varen Nagasaki | 8 | 3.7 | 1.7 | +2.0 | 8 |
| 2 | Sanfrecce Hiroshima | 8 | 2.2 | 0.6 | +1.6 | 17 |
| 3 | Yokohama F. Marinos | 8 | 3.0 | 1.5 | +1.5 | 14 |
| 4 | Vissel Kobe | 8 | 2.3 | 0.9 | +1.4 | 19 |
| 5 | FC Tokyo | 8 | 3.0 | 1.7 | +1.3 | 17 |
| 6 | Cerezo Osaka | 8 | 1.8 | 1.1 | +0.7 | 11 |
| 7 | Urawa Red Diamonds | 8 | 1.9 | 1.4 | +0.5 | 12 |
| 8 | Fagiano Okayama | 8 | 1.3 | 0.8 | +0.5 | 13 |
| 9 | Mito Hollyhock | 8 | 1.6 | 1.3 | +0.3 | 9 |
| 10 | Kashima Antlers | 8 | 1.3 | 1.6 | -0.3 | 13 |
| 11 | Avispa Fukuoka | 8 | 1.4 | 1.9 | -0.5 | 4 |
| 12 | JEF United Chiba | 8 | 0.8 | 1.3 | -0.5 | 4 |
| 13 | Kashiwa Reysol | 8 | 1.1 | 1.8 | -0.7 | 18 |
| 14 | Shimizu S-Pulse | 8 | 1.7 | 3.0 | -1.3 | 10 |
| 15 | Tokyo Verdy | 8 | 0.9 | 2.3 | -1.4 | 4 |
| 16 | Kyoto Sanga | 8 | 1.5 | 3.0 | -1.5 | 8 |
| 17 | Nagoya Grampus | 8 | 0.6 | 2.2 | -1.6 | 6 |
| 18 | Gamba Osaka | 8 | 1.7 | 3.7 | -2.0 | 6 |
| 19 | Machida Zelvia | 8 | — | — | — | 17 |
| 20 | Kawasaki Frontale | 8 | — | — | — | 13 |
