The model missed the final outcome (Draw 2–2).
The model had projected Jong PSV at 47.7%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Pasaran yang dijejaki vs hasil sepenuh masa
Gred ramalan
C
Setiap baris membandingkan model pra-perlawanan lean dengan keputusan sepenuh masa.
- Pasaran Ramalan Hasilnya Hasil
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 matlamat) ✔ Betul
- Kedua-dua Pasukan Menjaringkan Gol BTTS Ya Ya ✔ Betul
- 1X2 Jong PSV Lukis ✖ tak betul
- Cerapan skor tepat 1-1, 1-2, 0-1, 0-2, 2-1 2-2 ✖ tak betul
Model lwn Pasaran Penutup
| Hasil | Model | Menutup Pasaran | Perbezaan | isyarat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Waalwijk | 25.8% | 55.8% | -30.0 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 26.5% | 21.4% | +5.2 pp | Model Higher |
| Jong PSV | 47.7% | 22.9% | +24.8 pp | Model Edge |
The closing market estimates Waalwijk's win probability at 55.8%, compared with the model's estimate of 25.8%, a difference of 30.0 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
Selepas sepenuh masa, hasilnya ialah Draw 2–2.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.96) — 4 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
- Over 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
What failed
- 1X2: model leaned Jong PSV; match finished Draw
- Exact score: outside the model's top score bins
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Jong PSV by 30.0 percentage points (77.7% vs model 47.7%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Laman pertaruhan premium stake: pengguna baharu boleh guna kod promo FHn2uDc1. Daftar sekarang
Garis Masa Ramalan
Cara ramalan ini beralih daripada ramalan kepada semakan sepenuh masa.
-
Aug 28, 2026 · 18:00 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Waalwijk 25.8% · Draw 26.6% · Jong PSV 47.7%
- xG · Waalwijk 1.23 — Jong PSV 1.73
-
Aug 28, 2026 · 17:32 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Waalwijk 1.70 · Draw 4.44 · Jong PSV 4.14
- Implied 1X2 · Waalwijk 55.8% · Draw 21.4% · Jong PSV 22.9%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 28, 2026 · 17:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Waalwijk 1.70 · Draw 4.44 · Jong PSV 4.14
- Implied 1X2 · Waalwijk 55.8% · Draw 21.4% · Jong PSV 22.9%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 28, 2026 · 18:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Draw · 2–2
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Gambar Sejarah
Dibekukan pada sepak mula — keluaran model seperti sebelum perlawanan bermula.
Keputusan sejarah:
Cautious / Wait
Label sejarah: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".
Keputusan Sejarah
Wait
Hasil
Missed
Metrik pra-padanan (konteks sejarah)
Kebolehpercayaan Ramalan
48/100
· Moderate
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (30 pp)
Bukti
★★★★★
- No strong statistical edge
- Market strongly disagrees on price
- Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap)
0/100
Monitoring Confidence
13/100
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
1.7
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
Pending
Final Result
Draw · Waalwijk 2–2 Jong PSV
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
C
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Semakan Soalan Lazim
- Sejauh manakah ramalan itu tepat?
- Halaman ini menilai pasaran berarah (1X2, Lebih/Bawah 2.5, BTTS) berbanding keputusan sepenuh masa. Gred ramalan menggambarkan bilangan pasaran yang dijejaki itu sepadan dengan realiti.
- Apakah ukuran Ketepatan xG?
- Ketepatan xG membandingkan profil matlamat jangkaan pra-perlawanan model dengan garis skor sebenar — bukan sama ada setiap pasaran mencecah. Semakan arah yang kukuh boleh wujud bersama dengan skor ketepatan xG yang sederhana.
- Mengapakah skor tepat tidak diramalkan?
- Hasil skor betul ialah ekor berkemungkinan rendah walaupun model membaca profil padanan dengan baik. Kami menyerlahkan tong skor tertinggi untuk konteks; kehilangan baris tepat tidak membatalkan semakan arah.
- Adakah ini meningkatkan rekod AI?
- Setiap perlawanan selesai dilog masuk dalam saluran paip pengesahan kami. Kadar hit teragregat dan kajian CLV diterbitkan secara berasingan — halaman ini ialah jejak audit setiap perlawanan.
Ramalan adalah untuk tujuan maklumat sahaja. Sentiasa berjudi dengan penuh tanggungjawab dan dalam had anda. Prestasi masa lalu tidak menjamin hasil masa depan.
Taklimat AI untuk perlawanan ini belum tersedia. Selepas naik taraf pelayan, jalankan semula “Batch generate odds” untuk menjana ringkasan.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "4951bed3082f79a78fe7bf2f7edf57c8752e84ce6281ecc478fb7905aa77c2a5",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.73,
"away_win_prob": 0.4769,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.403,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.597,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2653,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.1,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.77,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 3.88,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.23,
"home_win_prob": 0.2578,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.568,
"prediction_confidence": "low",
"under_25_prob": 0.432
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Combo Double chance : Waalwijk or draw and +1.5 goals",
"main_pick_display": "Winner : Jong PSV",
"percent_away": "30%",
"percent_draw": "35%",
"percent_home": "35%",
"winner_name": "Waalwijk"
},
"away_xg": 1.73,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Jong PSV",
"confidence": 47.7,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "Winner : Jong PSV",
"edge": 0.2476,
"edge_gap": 0.2111,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.229,
"model_prob": 0.4766,
"pick_type": "winner",
"probabilities": {
"away": 47.7,
"draw": 26.5,
"home": 25.8
},
"reason": "",
"selection": "away",
"selection_name": "Jong PSV"
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 4.14
}
],
"risk_color": "#f44336",
"risk_key": "high_risk",
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 4.14,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Jong PSV Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Away",
"market_fair_odds": 4.37,
"market_odds": 4.14,
"model_odds": 2.1,
"overround": 5.5,
"prob_edge": 23.5,
"value_pct": 97.1,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 0,
"away_failed_to_score": 0,
"away_played": 2,
"away_score_rate": 82.3,
"home_clean_sheet": 0,
"home_failed_to_score": 0,
"home_played": 3,
"home_score_rate": 70.8,
"no_prob": 40.3,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 59.7,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"yes_prob": 59.7
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.73,
"home_expected": 1.23,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 11.0
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 9.5
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.0
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-2",
"prob": 7.8
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 6.8
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Waalwijk or Draw",
"prob": 52.3
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Waalwijk or Jong PSV",
"prob": 73.5
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Jong PSV",
"prob": 74.2
}
],
"pick_key": "X2",
"pick_label": "Draw or Jong PSV",
"pick_prob": 74.2
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 47.7,
"draw_pct": 26.5,
"home_pct": 25.8,
"lean_key": "away",
"lean_label": "Jong PSV"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": "+1.5",
"avg_total": 2.96,
"away_avg_scored": 2.0,
"confidence": "medium",
"home_avg_scored": 1.3,
"over_prob": 56.8,
"pick": "Over 2.5",
"pick_prob": 56.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"total_expected": 2.96,
"under_prob": 43.2
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 97.5,
"implied_prob": 24.2,
"is_value": false,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Jong PSV Win",
"model_prob": 47.7,
"odds": 4.14
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Jong PSV",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 22.9,
"draw": 21.35,
"home": 55.76
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-08-28 17:59:58",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-08-28 17:32:13",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Waalwijk",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 55.76,
"gap_pp": -29.96,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 25.79
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 21.35,
"gap_pp": 5.2,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 26.55
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 22.9,
"gap_pp": 24.76,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 47.66
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 67.36,
"gap_pp": -10.56,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 56.8
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 32.64,
"gap_pp": 10.56,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 43.2
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 1.7,
"early": 1.7,
"implied_closing_pct": 55.76,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 55.76,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 4.44,
"early": 4.44,
"implied_closing_pct": 21.35,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 21.35,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 4.14,
"early": 4.14,
"implied_closing_pct": 22.9,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 22.9,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.41,
"early": 1.41,
"implied_closing_pct": 67.36,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 67.36,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 2.91,
"early": 2.91,
"implied_closing_pct": 32.64,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 32.64,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 24.8,
"kind": "1x2_a"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": 0.2,
"ev": 0.0175,
"has_edge": true,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 9.25,
"market_prob": 0.1081,
"market_prob_pct": 10.8,
"model_prob": 0.11,
"model_prob_pct": 11.0,
"n_bookmakers": 10,
"status_key": "positive_edge"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 11.0
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 11.0
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 9.5
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.0
},
{
"label": "0-2",
"prob": 7.8
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 6.8
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.23,
"homepage_pick": {
"best_bookmaker": "Bet365",
"best_odds": 4.33,
"confidence": "lean",
"display_label": "Away Jong PSV",
"edge": 24.6,
"ev": 0.0,
"probability": 47.7
},
"market_cards": [
{
"authority_action": "wait",
"authority_note": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
"consensus_odds": 4.14,
"decision": "value_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"ev": 0.0767,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 7.7,
"text": "+7.7%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.229,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": 0.0767,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 7.7,
"text": "+7.7%"
},
"model_prob": 0.4766,
"raw_edge_display": "+24.8 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 24.8,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.9731,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+97.3%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Jong PSV",
"sort_key": 10219.03,
"tier": "best"
},
{
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"ev_available": false,
"ev_over": null,
"ev_over_display": null,
"ev_under": null,
"ev_under_display": null,
"featured": false,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": null,
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"over_prob": 56.8,
"sort_key": 4050.0,
"tier": "lean",
"under_prob": 43.2,
"value_side": "over"
},
{
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"ev_available": false,
"ev_no": null,
"ev_no_display": null,
"ev_yes": null,
"ev_yes_display": null,
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": null,
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"no_prob": 40.3,
"sort_key": 4050.0,
"tier": "lean",
"value_side": "yes",
"yes_prob": 59.7
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 813.0,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 11.0
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "8/13",
"alert_breadth_note": "8/13 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2191 +4.9%",
"alert_team": "Waalwijk",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 30.0,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -29.98,
"hero_label": "Waalwijk",
"market_prob_pct": 22.9,
"market_team": "Waalwijk",
"model_prob_pct": 47.7,
"model_team": "Jong PSV",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "!",
"status_key": "caution",
"status_label": "Use caution",
"status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
"steam_score": 40,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "market_disagree",
"read_min": 5,
"title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
"url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 30.0,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 30.0,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (Jong PSV), but pricing still diverges by 30.0 pp."
},
"authority": {
"action": "wait",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 30.0,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 30.0,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (Jong PSV), but pricing still diverges by 30.0 pp."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0767,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.9731,
"confidence_band": "Moderate",
"decision_strength": 5.2,
"decision_strength_v1": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.7,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 37,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Jong PSV at 47.7%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 22.9%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Jong PSV as the value side (47.7%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 24.8,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u23f8",
"label": "Wait for validation",
"market_signal": "Direction aligns with model lean; pricing still diverges",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Jong PSV",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": null,
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Jong PSV \u00b7 decimal odds ~4.14 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +97% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1551773 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22484.14 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +7.7% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +7.7% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +7.7% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 5.2/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +7.7% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 5.2/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "57 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "37 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+7.7% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": false,
"value": "false"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market favour the same side (Jong PSV), but pricing still diverges by 30.0 pp.",
"Decision strength: 5.2/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +97% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 57,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"subline": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "wait",
"validation_ok": false,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0767,
"consensus_ev_display": "+7.7%",
"consensus_odds": 4.14,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.229,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4766,
"raw_edge_display": "+24.8 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 24.8,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.24154589371980678,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.9731,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+97.3%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 28.1,
"reasons": [
"Clear xG separation gap=0.5"
],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "clear",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 5,
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"xg_gap": 0.5
}
}
},
"bet_status": "wait",
"books_breadth_display": "8/13",
"breadth_ratio": 0.6153846153846154,
"evidence": {
"score": 68,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift supports model side (direction only \u2014 not pricing convergence)",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation warning",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Warning",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "gap",
"label": "Large market gap (30 pp)",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift aligns with model",
"tone": "ok"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 10.0,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 6.2,
"steam_coherence": 10.0,
"validation": 14.0
},
"score": 57,
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 29.98,
"market_agreement": "weak",
"max_gap_pp": 29.98,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.73,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 28.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.23,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.73,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.23 \u00b7 Away xG 1.73 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +28%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": true,
"mv_status": "warning",
"odds_delta_pct": 4.9,
"steam_conflicts": false,
"steam_move_display": "\u2191 +4.9%",
"steam_team": "Waalwijk",
"suppress_execution": true,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 37,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 0,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 47,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 0,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "wait",
"label": "Wait - No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "Model and market favour the same side (Jong PSV), but pricing still diverges by 30.0 pp.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 30.0,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 30.0,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (Jong PSV), but pricing still diverges by 30.0 pp."
},
"authority": {
"action": "wait",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 30.0,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 30.0,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (Jong PSV), but pricing still diverges by 30.0 pp."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0767,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.9731,
"confidence_band": "Moderate",
"decision_strength": 5.2,
"decision_strength_v1": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.7,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 37,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Jong PSV at 47.7%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 22.9%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Jong PSV as the value side (47.7%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 24.8,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u23f8",
"label": "Wait for validation",
"market_signal": "Direction aligns with model lean; pricing still diverges",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Jong PSV",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": null,
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Jong PSV \u00b7 decimal odds ~4.14 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +97% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1551773 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22484.14 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +7.7% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +7.7% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +7.7% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 5.2/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +7.7% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 5.2/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "57 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "37 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+7.7% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": false,
"value": "false"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market favour the same side (Jong PSV), but pricing still diverges by 30.0 pp.",
"Decision strength: 5.2/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +97% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 57,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"subline": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "wait",
"validation_ok": false,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0767,
"consensus_ev_display": "+7.7%",
"consensus_odds": 4.14,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.229,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4766,
"raw_edge_display": "+24.8 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 24.8,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.24154589371980678,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.9731,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+97.3%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 28.1,
"reasons": [
"Clear xG separation gap=0.5"
],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "clear",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 5,
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"xg_gap": 0.5
}
}
},
"headline": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u23f8",
"label": "Wait for validation",
"subline": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
"tier": "wait"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Waalwijk 1.23 xG vs Jong PSV 1.73 \u2192 Jong PSV 47.7%",
"Market: Waalwijk ~22.9% implied",
"Market Drift: Waalwijk odds \u2191 +4.9%"
],
"one_liner": "Model leans Jong PSV, but market pricing diverges by 30 pp.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -29.98,
"fair_prob": 25.78,
"label": "Waalwijk",
"market_prob": 55.76,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 5.18,
"fair_prob": 26.53,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 21.35,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 24.79,
"fair_prob": 47.69,
"label": "Jong PSV",
"market_prob": 22.9,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 56.8,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 43.2,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 59.7,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 40.3,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "extreme_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -29.98,
"fair_prob_pct": 25.78,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "Waalwijk",
"market_prob_pct": 55.76,
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "Waalwijk"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Waalwijk\u0027s win probability at 55.8%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 25.8%, a difference of 30.0 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "extreme",
"edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 29.98,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": true
},
"divergence_label": "Extreme model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "extreme",
"divergence_level_label": "Extreme divergence",
"divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs substantially from current market pricing. Large divergences can occur when rating inputs are incomplete, team-strength estimates are uncertain, or the market incorporates information not present in the model. Interpret with caution.",
"divergence_tier": "extreme",
"edge_label": "Extreme disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "extreme_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Slight favourite",
"favourite_label": "Jong PSV",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "medium",
"headline": "Slight edge match",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Supports model direction",
"positive": true
},
"market_prob_pct": 22.9,
"model_prob_gap_display": "+24.8 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": 24.8,
"model_prob_pct": 47.7,
"outcome_separation_tier": "medium",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "+24.8 percentage points",
"gap_pp": 24.8,
"label": "Low convergence",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_low"
},
"reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
"reliability_icon": "!",
"reliability_score": 57,
"reliability_tier": "limited",
"summary": "Jong PSV \u2014 market direction supports the model, but pricing still diverges (+24.8 pp).",
"tier": "slight_edge",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Warning",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 37,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 0,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 47,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 0,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "wait",
"label": "Wait - No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Waalwijk 1.23 xG vs Jong PSV 1.73 \u2192 Jong PSV 47.7%",
"Market: Waalwijk ~22.9% implied",
"Market Drift: Waalwijk odds \u2191 +4.9%"
],
"one_liner": "Model leans Jong PSV, but market pricing diverges by 30 pp.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "A lead outcome exists, but the match is not one-sided in the model.",
"tier": "medium",
"tier_label": "Medium"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Medium",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -29.98,
"hero_label": "Waalwijk",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "Waalwijk odds lengthened \u2191 +4.9%.",
"market_agreement": "weak",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_interpretation": {},
"market_narrative": {},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 29.98,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
"status": "warning"
},
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Favourite exceeds second outcome by 21.2 pp (at 47.7%)."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 21.2,
"max_prob_pct": 47.7,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "medium",
"tier_label": "Medium"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Medium",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "extreme",
"largest_gap_label": "Waalwijk",
"largest_gap_pp": -30.0,
"lead": "The closing market prices Waalwijk higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "extreme",
"max_gap_pp": 30.0,
"title": "Strong Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -29.98,
"edge_pp": -29.98,
"fair_prob_pct": 25.78,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Waalwijk",
"market_prob_pct": 55.76,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 5.18,
"edge_pp": 5.18,
"fair_prob_pct": 26.53,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 21.35,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "model_higher",
"signal_label": "Model Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 24.79,
"edge_pp": 24.79,
"fair_prob_pct": 47.69,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Jong PSV",
"market_prob_pct": 22.9,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "model_edge",
"signal_label": "Model Edge"
}
],
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Waalwijk (22.9%).",
"Waalwijk odds have drifted longer across books (\u2191 +4.9%, 8/13) \u2014 market pricing moves against this side.",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Jong PSV, Market \u2192 Waalwijk, while Waalwijk odds drifted longer (market fade).",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 58.82,
"closing_odds": 1.7,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 58.82,
"entry_odds": 1.7,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"model_validation_status": "warning",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 8,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 1,
"bookmaker_name": "10Bet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +6.8%",
"odds_delta_pct": 6.8
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +4.9%",
"odds_delta_pct": 4.9
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 7,
"bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +4.9%",
"odds_delta_pct": 4.9
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +4.3%",
"odds_delta_pct": 4.3
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +4.3%",
"odds_delta_pct": 4.3
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +4.2%",
"odds_delta_pct": 4.2
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +3.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 3.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 9,
"bookmaker_name": "Dafabet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": 2.4
}
],
"books_total": 13,
"breadth_display": "8/13",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 1.7,
"is_drift": true,
"move_context": "Highest consensus move",
"move_display": "\u2191 +4.9%",
"move_pct_abs": 4.9,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 83h 7m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"Bet365 led repricing on Waalwijk (4.9%) \u2014 sharp book moved before wider follow-through.",
"A meaningful move led by sharper sportsbooks, with moderate market confirmation."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": 4.9,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"1.70",
"1.66",
"1.62"
],
"display": "1.73 \u2192 1.61 \u2192 1.70",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 83h 7m",
"pick_team": "Waalwijk",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "1.73"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "1.61"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "1.70"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
1.62,
1.7
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 56.0,0.0",
"sparkline_trend": "up",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way rise",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "1.62"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "1.62"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "1.70"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "1.70"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 1.62,
"page_alert_line": "Broad drift across 8/13 sportsbooks on Waalwijk",
"phase_label": "Sharp repricing",
"phase_tip": "Aggressive adjustment \u2014 often sharp-led or high consensus.",
"pick_team": "Waalwijk",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "",
"sharp_leader": "Bet365",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "confirm",
"signal_icon": "\u26a1",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 1.7,
"is_drift": true,
"label": "Market Signal",
"move_display": "\u2191 +4.9%",
"open_odds": 1.62,
"summary": "Broad market drift supports the same direction as the model lean.",
"team": "Waalwijk",
"tone": "with"
},
"signal_key": "sharp_led",
"signal_label": "Sharp-led move",
"steam_score": 40,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "8/13",
"current_odds": 1.7,
"move_display": "\u2191 +4.9%",
"open_odds": 1.62,
"pick_team": "Waalwijk",
"steam_score": 40,
"steam_team_name": "Waalwijk",
"steam_tier": "B"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 30.0,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Jong PSV",
"away_team_id": 411,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/411.webp",
"away_team_name": "Jong PSV",
"away_team_name_canonical": "Jong PSV",
"away_team_public_id": "08XBadEwEl50Ee",
"away_team_slug": "jong-psv",
"country_code": "NL",
"country_display_name": "Netherlands",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/nl.svg",
"country_id": 115,
"country_name": "Netherlands",
"fixture_id": 1551773,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Netherlands",
"home_team_display_name": "Waalwijk",
"home_team_id": 417,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/417.webp",
"home_team_name": "Waalwijk",
"home_team_public_id": "1fFXqWV34fQcjG",
"home_team_slug": "waalwijk",
"league_country": "Netherlands",
"league_country_display": "Netherlands",
"league_display_name": "Eerste Divisie",
"league_id": 89,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/89.webp",
"league_name": "Eerste Divisie",
"league_public_id": "3fIkfoWJytykc5",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-08-28 18:00:00",
"public_id": "17hRLpLAgCe8G6",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Waalwijk",
"venue_name": "Mandemakers Stadion"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.5
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.1257,
"best_odd": 4.14,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0311,
"ev": 0.0767,
"implied_prob": 0.229,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.229,
"draw": 0.2135,
"home": 0.5576
},
"model_prob": 0.4766,
"p_final": 0.2601
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.1844,
"best_odd": 4.44,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0096,
"ev": -0.0096,
"implied_prob": 0.2135,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.229,
"draw": 0.2135,
"home": 0.5576
},
"model_prob": 0.2655,
"p_final": 0.2231
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.3303,
"best_odd": 1.7,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.099,
"ev": -0.2204,
"implied_prob": 0.5576,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.229,
"draw": 0.2135,
"home": 0.5576
},
"model_prob": 0.2579,
"p_final": 0.4586
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 4.14,
"edge": 0.235,
"ev": 0.9731,
"implied_prob": 0.2415,
"model_prob": 0.4766
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 4.44,
"edge": 0.0402,
"ev": 0.1787,
"implied_prob": 0.2252,
"model_prob": 0.2655
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 1.7,
"edge": -0.3303,
"ev": -0.5615,
"implied_prob": 0.5882,
"model_prob": 0.2579
}
},
"btts": {
"btts_ev_mode": "unavailable",
"ev_available": false,
"market_first": {
"available": false
},
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"reliability": "low"
},
"ou25": {
"ev_available": false,
"market_first": {
"available": false
},
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"ou_ev_mode": "unavailable",
"reliability": "low"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.96,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0767,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.9731,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.0767,
"confidence": 5.0,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"guard_capped": true,
"score": 5.2,
"score_before_guard": 5.0,
"score_v1_legacy": 3.0,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 4.7,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"score": 5.2,
"score_pre_penalty": 4.7
},
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "B",
"stake_factor": 0.5
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "wait",
"final_decision": {
"action": "wait",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 30.0,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Direction agree \u00b7 Pricing diverges",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 30.0,
"summary": "Model and market favour the same side (Jong PSV), but pricing still diverges by 30.0 pp."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0767,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.9731,
"confidence_band": "Moderate",
"decision_strength": 5.2,
"decision_strength_v1": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.7,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 37,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Jong PSV at 47.7%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 22.9%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Jong PSV as the value side (47.7%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 24.8,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u23f8",
"label": "Wait for validation",
"market_signal": "Direction aligns with model lean; pricing still diverges",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Jong PSV",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": null,
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side Jong PSV \u00b7 decimal odds ~4.14 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +97% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1551773 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22484.14 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +7.7% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +7.7% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +7.7% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 5.2/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +7.7% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 5.2/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "57 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "37 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+7.7% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": false,
"value": "false"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market favour the same side (Jong PSV), but pricing still diverges by 30.0 pp.",
"Decision strength: 5.2/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +97% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 57,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"subline": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "wait",
"validation_ok": false,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0767,
"consensus_ev_display": "+7.7%",
"consensus_odds": 4.14,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.229,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4766,
"raw_edge_display": "+24.8 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 24.8,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.24154589371980678,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.9731,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+97.3%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 28.1,
"reasons": [
"Clear xG separation gap=0.5"
],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "clear",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 5,
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"xg_gap": 0.5
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5927\u5f00\u5927\u5408\uff08\u8fdb\u7403\u578b\uff09",
"scoring_type": "high_scoring",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.597,
"draw_prob": 0.2655,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.4766,
"over_prob": 0.568,
"total_xg": 2.96,
"under_prob": 0.432,
"xg_diff": 0.5
},
"type": "high_scoring",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"guard_active": true,
"guard_level": "extreme",
"guard_message": "Model validation failed \u2014 value signals on 1X2 are not actionable until inputs are verified.",
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 4.14,
"decision": "guard_blocked",
"decision_before_guard": "value_bet",
"edge": 0.0311,
"ev": 0.0767,
"guard_blocked": true,
"implied_prob": 0.229,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.4766,
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Jong PSV"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"edge": null,
"ev": null,
"implied_prob": null,
"model_prob": 0.597,
"side": "yes",
"value_side": "yes"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"edge": null,
"ev": null,
"implied_prob": null,
"model_prob": 0.568,
"side": "over",
"value_side": "over"
}
},
"match_id": 1551773,
"match_regime": {
"action": "optional",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": false,
"code": "thin_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.0767,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 0.25,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.4766,
"draw": 0.2655,
"home": 0.2579
},
"reason_codes": [
"high_total_goals"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Jong PSV",
"home": "Waalwijk"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.029244,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0767,
"implied_prob": 0.229,
"market": "1x2",
"model_prob": 0.4766,
"not_dominant": true,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Jong PSV",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 1,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0767,
"consensus_ev_display": "+7.7%",
"consensus_odds": 4.14,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.229,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4766,
"raw_edge_display": "+24.8 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 24.8,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.24154589371980678,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.9731,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+97.3%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1551773,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-08-28T18:00:00.369730+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Terokai Kandungan Ramalan Lain
Dapatkan Ramalan Premium untuk Waalwijk & Jong PSV!
Buka analisis mendalam, tip pertaruhan eksklusif, dan ramalan perlawanan dengan perkhidmatan langganan premium kami.
Langgan Sekarang
Eerste Divisie — Kedudukan
| # | PASUKAN | P | M | S | K | Mata |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heracles | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 21 |
| 2 | Almere City FC | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 16 |
| 3 | MVV Maastricht | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 16 |
| 4 | VVV Venlo | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 15 |
| 5 | Roda | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 15 |
| 6 | Emmen | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 15 |
| 7 | Waalwijk | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 13 |
| 8 | Vitesse | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 13 |
| 9 | NAC Breda | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 13 |
| 10 | Jong AZ | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 13 |
| 11 | FC Volendam | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 12 |
| 12 | Jong PSV | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 12 |
| 13 | FC Eindhoven | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 10 |
| 14 | Helmond Sport | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| 15 | Jong Ajax | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| 16 | Den Bosch | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| 17 | Dordrecht | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| 18 | Jong Utrecht | 9 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| 19 | FC OSS | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| 20 | De Graafschap | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| # | PASUKAN | P | J | B | +/- | Mata |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heracles | 8 | 26 | 10 | +16 | 21 |
| 2 | Jong AZ | 9 | 22 | 17 | +5 | 13 |
| 3 | VVV Venlo | 8 | 21 | 14 | +7 | 15 |
| 4 | FC Volendam | 8 | 20 | 16 | +4 | 12 |
| 5 | Almere City FC | 8 | 18 | 7 | +11 | 16 |
| 6 | Waalwijk | 8 | 18 | 11 | +7 | 13 |
| 7 | Emmen | 8 | 18 | 17 | +1 | 15 |
| 8 | NAC Breda | 8 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 13 |
| 9 | Jong Utrecht | 9 | 15 | 21 | -6 | 7 |
| 10 | Jong PSV | 9 | 14 | 16 | -2 | 12 |
| 11 | Vitesse | 8 | 13 | 11 | +2 | 13 |
| 12 | Helmond Sport | 8 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 8 |
| 13 | FC Eindhoven | 8 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 10 |
| 14 | Jong Ajax | 9 | 13 | 22 | -9 | 8 |
| 15 | MVV Maastricht | 8 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 16 |
| 16 | Den Bosch | 7 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 7 |
| 17 | Dordrecht | 8 | 12 | 23 | -11 | 7 |
| 18 | Roda | 8 | 9 | 5 | +4 | 15 |
| 19 | FC OSS | 8 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 6 |
| 20 | De Graafschap | 7 | 8 | 20 | -12 | 4 |
| # | PASUKAN | P | xG | xGC | +/- | Mata |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FC Volendam | 8 | 9.6 | 5.1 | +4.5 | 12 |
| 2 | Heracles | 8 | 10.1 | 6.0 | +4.1 | 21 |
| 3 | Emmen | 8 | 9.2 | 6.2 | +3.0 | 15 |
| 4 | NAC Breda | 8 | 9.8 | 6.9 | +2.9 | 13 |
| 5 | MVV Maastricht | 8 | 6.7 | 3.8 | +2.9 | 16 |
| 6 | Jong PSV | 9 | 8.5 | 5.7 | +2.8 | 12 |
| 7 | Den Bosch | 7 | 9.6 | 7.0 | +2.6 | 7 |
| 8 | Vitesse | 8 | 8.0 | 6.8 | +1.2 | 13 |
| 9 | Jong AZ | 9 | 6.9 | 5.7 | +1.2 | 13 |
| 10 | Almere City FC | 8 | 7.2 | 6.1 | +1.1 | 16 |
| 11 | Roda | 8 | 8.1 | 7.2 | +0.9 | 15 |
| 12 | Waalwijk | 8 | 4.8 | 4.6 | +0.2 | 13 |
| 13 | FC OSS | 8 | 5.3 | 7.3 | -2.0 | 6 |
| 14 | De Graafschap | 7 | 5.4 | 7.6 | -2.2 | 4 |
| 15 | Jong Ajax | 9 | 8.4 | 10.8 | -2.4 | 8 |
| 16 | VVV Venlo | 8 | 5.7 | 8.9 | -3.2 | 15 |
| 17 | Helmond Sport | 8 | 2.6 | 6.2 | -3.6 | 8 |
| 18 | Jong Utrecht | 9 | 5.4 | 9.6 | -4.2 | 7 |
| 19 | FC Eindhoven | 8 | 3.9 | 8.2 | -4.3 | 10 |
| 20 | Dordrecht | 8 | 5.0 | 10.7 | -5.7 | 7 |
