AI correctly predicted the Gyeongnam FC win.
The match finished 5–0, validating the model's directional assessment.
Pasaran yang dijejaki vs hasil sepenuh masa
Setiap baris membandingkan model pra-perlawanan lean dengan keputusan sepenuh masa.
- Pasaran Ramalan Hasilnya Hasil
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (5 matlamat) ✖ tak betul
- Kedua-dua Pasukan Menjaringkan Gol BTTS Ya Tidak ✖ tak betul
- 1X2 Gyeongnam FC Gyeongnam FC ✔ Betul
- Cerapan skor tepat 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 5-0 ✖ tak betul
Model lwn Pasaran Penutup
| Hasil | Model | Menutup Pasaran | Perbezaan | isyarat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gyeongnam FC | 43.5% | 53.8% | -10.3 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 28.6% | 25.2% | +3.4 pp | Aligned |
| Ansan Greeners | 27.9% | 21.0% | +6.9 pp | Model Higher |
The closing market estimates Gyeongnam FC's win probability at 53.8%, compared with the model's estimate of 43.5%, a difference of 10.3 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
Selepas sepenuh masa, lean arah model sepadan dengan keputusan (Gyeongnam FC win 5–0).
Market Assessment
The market is materially more optimistic about Gyeongnam FC than the current fair estimate.
- Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
- Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 5 goals materialised
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (5 goals)
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Gyeongnam FC higher (53.8% vs model 43.5%, 10.3 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Gyeongnam FC win 5–0).
Garis Masa Ramalan
Cara ramalan ini beralih daripada ramalan kepada semakan sepenuh masa.
-
Jul 19, 2026 · 19:22 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Gyeongnam FC 43.5% · Draw 28.6% · Ansan Greeners 27.9%
- xG · Gyeongnam FC 1.39 — Ansan Greeners 1.21
-
Jul 19, 2026 · 09:59 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Gyeongnam FC 1.77 · Draw 3.77 · Ansan Greeners 4.54
- Implied 1X2 · Gyeongnam FC 53.8% · Draw 25.2% · Ansan Greeners 21.0%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 19, 2026 · 10:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Gyeongnam FC 1.77 · Draw 3.77 · Ansan Greeners 4.54
- Implied 1X2 · Gyeongnam FC 53.8% · Draw 25.2% · Ansan Greeners 21.0%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 19, 2026 · 10:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Gyeongnam FC win · 5–0
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Gambar Sejarah
Dibekukan pada sepak mula — keluaran model seperti sebelum perlawanan bermula.
Metrik pra-padanan (konteks sejarah)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (10 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Market has already priced much of the edge
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Semakan Soalan Lazim
- Sejauh manakah ramalan itu tepat?
- Halaman ini menilai pasaran berarah (1X2, Lebih/Bawah 2.5, BTTS) berbanding keputusan sepenuh masa. Gred ramalan menggambarkan bilangan pasaran yang dijejaki itu sepadan dengan realiti.
- Apakah ukuran Ketepatan xG?
- Ketepatan xG membandingkan profil matlamat jangkaan pra-perlawanan model dengan garis skor sebenar — bukan sama ada setiap pasaran mencecah. Semakan arah yang kukuh boleh wujud bersama dengan skor ketepatan xG yang sederhana.
- Mengapakah skor tepat tidak diramalkan?
- Hasil skor betul ialah ekor berkemungkinan rendah walaupun model membaca profil padanan dengan baik. Kami menyerlahkan tong skor tertinggi untuk konteks; kehilangan baris tepat tidak membatalkan semakan arah.
- Adakah ini meningkatkan rekod AI?
- Setiap perlawanan selesai dilog masuk dalam saluran paip pengesahan kami. Kadar hit teragregat dan kajian CLV diterbitkan secara berasingan — halaman ini ialah jejak audit setiap perlawanan.
Ramalan adalah untuk tujuan maklumat sahaja. Sentiasa berjudi dengan penuh tanggungjawab dan dalam had anda. Prestasi masa lalu tidak menjamin hasil masa depan.
Terokai Kandungan Ramalan Lain
Dapatkan Ramalan Premium untuk Gyeongnam FC & Ansan Greeners!
Buka analisis mendalam, tip pertaruhan eksklusif, dan ramalan perlawanan dengan perkhidmatan langganan premium kami.
Langgan Sekarang
K Liga 2 Korea Selatan — Kedudukan
| # | PASUKAN | P | M | S | K | Mata |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Suwon Bluewings | 25 | 16 | 5 | 4 | 53 |
| 2 | Suwon City FC | 25 | 13 | 9 | 3 | 48 |
| 3 | Seoul E-Land FC | 26 | 14 | 6 | 6 | 48 |
| 4 | Daegu FC | 26 | 13 | 7 | 6 | 46 |
| 5 | Hwaseong | 26 | 12 | 8 | 6 | 44 |
| 6 | Busan I Park | 26 | 12 | 5 | 9 | 41 |
| 7 | Gimpo Citizen | 25 | 8 | 11 | 6 | 35 |
| 8 | Asan Mugunghwa | 25 | 9 | 7 | 9 | 34 |
| 9 | Gyeongnam FC | 25 | 8 | 10 | 7 | 34 |
| 10 | Seongnam FC | 25 | 7 | 10 | 8 | 31 |
| 11 | Cheongju | 26 | 5 | 14 | 7 | 29 |
| 12 | Paju Citizen | 25 | 8 | 5 | 12 | 29 |
| 13 | Yongin City | 25 | 5 | 12 | 8 | 27 |
| 14 | Cheonan City | 26 | 4 | 11 | 11 | 23 |
| 15 | Ansan Greeners | 26 | 6 | 4 | 16 | 22 |
| 16 | Jeonnam Dragons | 25 | 4 | 9 | 12 | 21 |
| 17 | Gimhae City | 25 | 2 | 7 | 16 | 13 |
| # | PASUKAN | P | J | B | +/- | Mata |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Suwon City FC | 25 | 50 | 29 | +21 | 48 |
| 2 | Daegu FC | 26 | 48 | 35 | +13 | 46 |
| 3 | Seoul E-Land FC | 26 | 45 | 30 | +15 | 48 |
| 4 | Hwaseong | 26 | 41 | 27 | +14 | 44 |
| 5 | Busan I Park | 26 | 41 | 34 | +7 | 41 |
| 6 | Suwon Bluewings | 25 | 39 | 20 | +19 | 53 |
| 7 | Asan Mugunghwa | 25 | 34 | 31 | +3 | 34 |
| 8 | Gimpo Citizen | 25 | 31 | 30 | +1 | 35 |
| 9 | Gyeongnam FC | 25 | 31 | 30 | +1 | 34 |
| 10 | Yongin City | 25 | 31 | 35 | -4 | 27 |
| 11 | Cheongju | 26 | 31 | 41 | -10 | 29 |
| 12 | Cheonan City | 26 | 30 | 37 | -7 | 23 |
| 13 | Seongnam FC | 25 | 28 | 30 | -2 | 31 |
| 14 | Jeonnam Dragons | 25 | 28 | 43 | -15 | 21 |
| 15 | Ansan Greeners | 26 | 27 | 49 | -22 | 22 |
| 16 | Paju Citizen | 25 | 24 | 28 | -4 | 29 |
| 17 | Gimhae City | 25 | 19 | 49 | -30 | 13 |