The model missed the final outcome (Juve Stabia win 1–2).
The model had projected UC Sampdoria at 41.2%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Pasar terlacak vs hasil penuh waktu
Setiap baris membandingkan model pra-pertandingan dengan hasil penuh waktu.
- Pasar Ramalan Hasil Hasil
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 sasaran) ✖ Salah
- Kedua Tim Mencetak Skor BTTS Tidak Ya ✖ Salah
- 1X2 UC Sampdoria Juve Stabia ✖ Salah
- Wawasan skor akurat 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 0-0, 2-1 1-2 ✖ Salah
Model vs Pasar Penutupan
| Hasil | Model | Menutup Pasar | Perbedaan | Sinyal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UC Sampdoria | 41.2% | 51.6% | -10.5 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 31.8% | 28.5% | +3.3 pp | Aligned |
| Juve Stabia | 27.1% | 19.9% | +7.2 pp | Model Higher |
The closing market estimates UC Sampdoria's win probability at 51.6%, compared with the model's estimate of 41.2%, a difference of 10.5 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
Setelah full time, hasilnya adalah Juve Stabia win 1–2.
Market Assessment
The market is materially more optimistic about UC Sampdoria than the current fair estimate.
- Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
- Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.
Post Match Insights
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS No; match finished BTTS Yes
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (3 goals)
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on UC Sampdoria by 10.5 percentage points (51.7% vs model 41.2%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Garis Waktu Prediksi
Bagaimana prediksi ini berpindah dari perkiraan ke tinjauan penuh waktu.
-
Aug 29, 2026 · 19:55 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · UC Sampdoria 41.1% · Draw 31.8% · Juve Stabia 27.1%
- xG · UC Sampdoria 1.16 — Juve Stabia 1.02
-
Aug 29, 2026 · 16:34 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · UC Sampdoria 1.87 · Draw 3.39 · Juve Stabia 4.86
- Implied 1X2 · UC Sampdoria 51.6% · Draw 28.5% · Juve Stabia 19.9%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 29, 2026 · 17:02 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · UC Sampdoria 1.87 · Draw 3.39 · Juve Stabia 4.86
- Implied 1X2 · UC Sampdoria 51.6% · Draw 28.5% · Juve Stabia 19.9%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 29, 2026 · 17:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Juve Stabia win · 1–2
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Cuplikan Sejarah
Dibekukan saat kickoff — keluaran model seperti sebelum pertandingan dimulai.
Metrik pra-pertandingan (konteks historis)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (10 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Market has already priced much of the edge
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Tinjau FAQ
- Seberapa akurat prediksinya?
- Halaman ini menilai pasar terarah (1X2, Atas/Bawah 2.5, BTTS) dibandingkan dengan hasil penuh waktu. Nilai prediksi mencerminkan seberapa banyak pasar yang dilacak tersebut sesuai dengan kenyataan.
- Apa yang diukur oleh Akurasi xG?
- Akurasi xG membandingkan profil gol yang diharapkan sebelum pertandingan dengan skor sebenarnya — bukan apakah setiap pasar berhasil. Tinjauan terarah yang kuat dapat dilakukan bersamaan dengan skor akurasi xG yang moderat.
- Mengapa skor pastinya tidak diprediksi?
- Hasil skor yang benar memiliki probabilitas yang rendah meskipun model membaca profil pertandingan dengan baik. Kami menyoroti kumpulan skor tertinggi untuk konteks; melewatkan garis yang tepat tidak membatalkan tinjauan terarah.
- Apakah ini meningkatkan rekor AI?
- Setiap kecocokan yang telah selesai dicatat dalam jalur validasi kami. Tingkat hit gabungan dan studi CLV dipublikasikan secara terpisah — halaman ini adalah jejak audit per pertandingan.
Prediksi hanya untuk tujuan informasi. Selalu bertaruh secara bertanggung jawab dan sesuai batas kemampuan Anda. Kinerja masa lalu tidak menjamin hasil di masa depan.
Jelajahi Konten Prediksi Lainnya
Dapatkan Prediksi Premium untuk UC Sampdoria & Juve Stabia!
Buka analisis mendalam, tips taruhan eksklusif, dan prakiraan pertandingan dengan layanan langganan premium kami.
Berlangganan Sekarang
Serie B — Klasemen
| # | TIM | Main | M | S | K | Poin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mantova | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| 2 | Palermo | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| 3 | Sudtirol | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| 4 | Avellino | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 5 | Padova | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 6 | Modena | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 7 | Ascoli | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 8 | Cesena | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 6 |
| 9 | Pisa | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| 10 | Empoli | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| 11 | Arezzo | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| 12 | Vicenza Virtus | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
| 13 | Benevento | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 14 | Virtus Entella | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 15 | Cremonese | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 16 | Hellas Verona | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| 17 | Catanzaro | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| 18 | Juve Stabia | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| 19 | Carrarese | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| 20 | UC Sampdoria | 4 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
| # | TIM | Main | Gol | Kebob | +/- | Poin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mantova | 4 | 8 | 3 | +5 | 10 |
| 2 | Palermo | 4 | 8 | 4 | +4 | 10 |
| 3 | Hellas Verona | 4 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 4 |
| 4 | Virtus Entella | 4 | 7 | 6 | +1 | 4 |
| 5 | Avellino | 4 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 7 |
| 6 | Modena | 4 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 7 |
| 7 | Cesena | 4 | 6 | 5 | +1 | 6 |
| 8 | Pisa | 4 | 6 | 6 | 0 | 6 |
| 9 | Vicenza Virtus | 4 | 6 | 8 | -2 | 5 |
| 10 | Sudtirol | 4 | 5 | 2 | +3 | 8 |
| 11 | Benevento | 4 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| 12 | Cremonese | 4 | 5 | 7 | -2 | 4 |
| 13 | Arezzo | 4 | 5 | 9 | -4 | 6 |
| 14 | Ascoli | 4 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 7 |
| 15 | Padova | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
| 16 | Catanzaro | 4 | 4 | 7 | -3 | 3 |
| 17 | Empoli | 4 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 6 |
| 18 | Juve Stabia | 4 | 3 | 6 | -3 | 2 |
| 19 | UC Sampdoria | 4 | 3 | 8 | -5 | 1 |
| 20 | Carrarese | 4 | 2 | 5 | -3 | 1 |
| # | TIM | Main | xG | xGC | +/- | Poin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hellas Verona | 4 | 4.8 | 2.2 | +2.6 | 4 |
| 2 | Modena | 4 | 3.2 | 1.3 | +1.9 | 7 |
| 3 | Benevento | 4 | 2.8 | 1.1 | +1.7 | 4 |
| 4 | Pisa | 4 | 3.7 | 2.2 | +1.5 | 6 |
| 5 | Palermo | 4 | 3.2 | 2.2 | +1.0 | 10 |
| 6 | Cesena | 4 | 3.0 | 2.1 | +0.9 | 6 |
| 7 | Mantova | 4 | 2.9 | 2.6 | +0.3 | 10 |
| 8 | UC Sampdoria | 4 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 1 |
| 9 | Carrarese | 4 | 2.7 | 2.8 | -0.1 | 1 |
| 10 | Vicenza Virtus | 4 | 2.9 | 3.1 | -0.2 | 5 |
| 11 | Arezzo | 4 | 2.5 | 2.7 | -0.2 | 6 |
| 12 | Empoli | 4 | 1.4 | 1.6 | -0.2 | 6 |
| 13 | Virtus Entella | 4 | 1.2 | 1.4 | -0.2 | 4 |
| 14 | Juve Stabia | 4 | 2.1 | 2.4 | -0.3 | 2 |
| 15 | Cremonese | 4 | 0.7 | 1.6 | -0.9 | 4 |
| 16 | Catanzaro | 4 | 2.8 | 3.8 | -1.0 | 3 |
| 17 | Padova | 4 | 2.0 | 3.3 | -1.3 | 7 |
| 18 | Sudtirol | 4 | 1.5 | 2.8 | -1.3 | 8 |
| 19 | Avellino | 4 | 2.5 | 4.4 | -1.9 | 7 |
| 20 | Ascoli | 4 | 2.9 | 4.9 | -2.0 | 7 |