AI correctly predicted the Guangzhou E-Power win.
The match finished 1–4, validating the model's directional assessment.
Pasar terlacak vs hasil penuh waktu
Setiap baris membandingkan model pra-pertandingan dengan hasil penuh waktu.
- Pasar Ramalan Hasil Hasil
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (5 sasaran) ✖ Salah
- Kedua Tim Mencetak Skor BTTS Ya Ya ✔ Benar
- 1X2 Guangzhou E-Power Guangzhou E-Power ✔ Benar
- Wawasan skor akurat 1-1, 0-1, 1-2, 1-0, 0-2 1-4 ✖ Salah
Model vs Pasar Penutupan
| Hasil | Model | Menutup Pasar | Perbedaan | Sinyal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shenzhen Juniors | 29.2% | 37.1% | -7.8 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 29.4% | 27.3% | +2.1 pp | Aligned |
| Guangzhou E-Power | 41.4% | 35.6% | +5.8 pp | Model Higher |
The closing market estimates Shenzhen Juniors's win probability at 37.1%, compared with the model's estimate of 29.2%, a difference of 7.8 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
Setelah waktu penuh, kemiringan terarah model cocok dengan hasilnya (Guangzhou E-Power win 1–4).
Market Assessment
The market and model broadly agree on Shenzhen Juniors. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 5 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
What failed
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (5 goals)
- Exact score: outside the model's top score bins
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Guangzhou E-Power higher (49.2% vs model 41.4%, 7.8 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Guangzhou E-Power win 1–4).
Garis Waktu Prediksi
Bagaimana prediksi ini berpindah dari perkiraan ke tinjauan penuh waktu.
-
Oct 01, 2026 · 01:34 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Shenzhen Juniors 29.3% · Draw 29.4% · Guangzhou E-Power 41.4%
- xG · Shenzhen Juniors 1.17 — Guangzhou E-Power 1.43
-
Oct 07, 2026 · 10:51 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE10
- 1X2 odds · Shenzhen Juniors 2.50 · Draw 3.40 · Guangzhou E-Power 2.60
- Implied 1X2 · Shenzhen Juniors 37.1% · Draw 27.3% · Guangzhou E-Power 35.6%
- Bookmaker · draftkings
-
Oct 07, 2026 · 10:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Shenzhen Juniors 2.50 · Draw 3.40 · Guangzhou E-Power 2.60
- Implied 1X2 · Shenzhen Juniors 37.1% · Draw 27.3% · Guangzhou E-Power 35.6%
- Bookmaker · draftkings
-
Oct 07, 2026 · 11:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Guangzhou E-Power win · 1–4
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Cuplikan Sejarah
Dibekukan saat kickoff — keluaran model seperti sebelum pertandingan dimulai.
Metrik pra-pertandingan (konteks historis)
- Validation: Pass
- No strong statistical edge
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Tinjau FAQ
- Seberapa akurat prediksinya?
- Halaman ini menilai pasar terarah (1X2, Atas/Bawah 2.5, BTTS) dibandingkan dengan hasil penuh waktu. Nilai prediksi mencerminkan seberapa banyak pasar yang dilacak tersebut sesuai dengan kenyataan.
- Apa yang diukur oleh Akurasi xG?
- Akurasi xG membandingkan profil gol yang diharapkan sebelum pertandingan dengan skor sebenarnya — bukan apakah setiap pasar berhasil. Tinjauan terarah yang kuat dapat dilakukan bersamaan dengan skor akurasi xG yang moderat.
- Mengapa skor pastinya tidak diprediksi?
- Hasil skor yang benar memiliki probabilitas yang rendah meskipun model membaca profil pertandingan dengan baik. Kami menyoroti kumpulan skor tertinggi untuk konteks; melewatkan garis yang tepat tidak membatalkan tinjauan terarah.
- Apakah ini meningkatkan rekor AI?
- Setiap kecocokan yang telah selesai dicatat dalam jalur validasi kami. Tingkat hit gabungan dan studi CLV dipublikasikan secara terpisah — halaman ini adalah jejak audit per pertandingan.
Prediksi hanya untuk tujuan informasi. Selalu bertaruh secara bertanggung jawab dan sesuai batas kemampuan Anda. Kinerja masa lalu tidak menjamin hasil di masa depan.
Jelajahi Konten Prediksi Lainnya
Dapatkan Prediksi Premium untuk Shenzhen Juniors & Guangzhou E-Power!
Buka analisis mendalam, tips taruhan eksklusif, dan prakiraan pertandingan dengan layanan langganan premium kami.
Berlangganan Sekarang
Liga Satu China — Klasemen
| # | TIM | Main | M | S | K | Poin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou E-Power | 24 | 16 | 6 | 2 | 54 |
| 2 | Guangxi Hengchen | 24 | 13 | 6 | 5 | 45 |
| 3 | Shenzhen Juniors | 24 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 44 |
| 4 | Nantong Zhiyun | 24 | 11 | 9 | 4 | 42 |
| 5 | Shaanxi Union | 24 | 10 | 6 | 8 | 36 |
| 6 | Yanbian Longding | 24 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 35 |
| 7 | Wuxi Wugou | 24 | 9 | 5 | 10 | 32 |
| 8 | Hebei Kungfu | 24 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 31 |
| 9 | Changchun Yatai | 24 | 10 | 3 | 11 | 29 |
| 10 | Ningbo Professional | 24 | 9 | 5 | 10 | 29 |
| 11 | Dalian Huayi | 24 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 29 |
| 12 | Suzhou Dongwu | 24 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 26 |
| 13 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 24 | 4 | 11 | 9 | 23 |
| 14 | Nanjing City | 24 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 21 |
| 15 | Meizhou Kejia | 24 | 7 | 3 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | Dongguan United | 24 | 2 | 7 | 15 | 13 |
| # | TIM | Main | Gol | Kebob | +/- | Poin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou E-Power | 24 | 48 | 20 | +28 | 54 |
| 2 | Guangxi Hengchen | 24 | 40 | 26 | +14 | 45 |
| 3 | Shenzhen Juniors | 24 | 39 | 25 | +14 | 44 |
| 4 | Shaanxi Union | 24 | 38 | 26 | +12 | 36 |
| 5 | Changchun Yatai | 24 | 37 | 40 | -3 | 29 |
| 6 | Wuxi Wugou | 24 | 36 | 29 | +7 | 32 |
| 7 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 24 | 35 | 46 | -11 | 23 |
| 8 | Nantong Zhiyun | 24 | 33 | 20 | +13 | 42 |
| 9 | Yanbian Longding | 24 | 33 | 27 | +6 | 35 |
| 10 | Dalian Huayi | 24 | 30 | 36 | -6 | 29 |
| 11 | Suzhou Dongwu | 24 | 28 | 33 | -5 | 26 |
| 12 | Ningbo Professional | 24 | 27 | 30 | -3 | 29 |
| 13 | Meizhou Kejia | 24 | 25 | 50 | -25 | 15 |
| 14 | Dongguan United | 24 | 24 | 49 | -25 | 13 |
| 15 | Hebei Kungfu | 24 | 22 | 25 | -3 | 31 |
| 16 | Nanjing City | 24 | 20 | 33 | -13 | 21 |