AI correctly predicted the Trans Narva win.
The match finished 1–2, validating the model's directional assessment.
Pasar terlacak vs hasil penuh waktu
Setiap baris membandingkan model pra-pertandingan dengan hasil penuh waktu.
- Pasar Ramalan Hasil Hasil
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 sasaran) ✖ Salah
- Kedua Tim Mencetak Skor BTTS Ya Ya ✔ Benar
- 1X2 Trans Narva Trans Narva ✔ Benar
- Wawasan skor akurat 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 1-2 ✔ Benar
Model vs Pasar Penutupan
| Hasil | Model | Menutup Pasar | Perbedaan | Sinyal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nõmme United | 30.6% | 45.5% | -14.9 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 29.5% | 24.4% | +5.0 pp | Model Higher |
| Trans Narva | 39.9% | 30.1% | +9.9 pp | Model Higher |
The closing market estimates Nõmme United's win probability at 45.5%, compared with the model's estimate of 30.6%, a difference of 14.9 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
Setelah waktu penuh, kemiringan terarah model cocok dengan hasilnya (Trans Narva win 1–2).
Market Assessment
The market is materially more optimistic about Nõmme United than the current fair estimate.
- Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
- Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 3 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
- Exact score 1–2 fell within the model's highlighted bins
What failed
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (3 goals)
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Trans Narva higher (54.8% vs model 39.9%, 14.9 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Trans Narva win 1–2).
Garis Waktu Prediksi
Bagaimana prediksi ini berpindah dari perkiraan ke tinjauan penuh waktu.
-
Jul 31, 2026 · 16:00 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Nõmme United 30.6% · Draw 29.5% · Trans Narva 40.0%
- xG · Nõmme United 1.20 — Trans Narva 1.40
-
Jul 31, 2026 · 15:32 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Nõmme United 2.04 · Draw 3.80 · Trans Narva 3.09
- Implied 1X2 · Nõmme United 45.5% · Draw 24.4% · Trans Narva 30.1%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 31, 2026 · 16:00 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Nõmme United 2.04 · Draw 3.80 · Trans Narva 3.09
- Implied 1X2 · Nõmme United 45.5% · Draw 24.4% · Trans Narva 30.1%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 31, 2026 · 16:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Trans Narva win · 1–2
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Cuplikan Sejarah
Dibekukan saat kickoff — keluaran model seperti sebelum pertandingan dimulai.
Metrik pra-pertandingan (konteks historis)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (15 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Market has already priced much of the edge
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Tinjau FAQ
- Seberapa akurat prediksinya?
- Halaman ini menilai pasar terarah (1X2, Atas/Bawah 2.5, BTTS) dibandingkan dengan hasil penuh waktu. Nilai prediksi mencerminkan seberapa banyak pasar yang dilacak tersebut sesuai dengan kenyataan.
- Apa yang diukur oleh Akurasi xG?
- Akurasi xG membandingkan profil gol yang diharapkan sebelum pertandingan dengan skor sebenarnya — bukan apakah setiap pasar berhasil. Tinjauan terarah yang kuat dapat dilakukan bersamaan dengan skor akurasi xG yang moderat.
- Mengapa skor pastinya tidak diprediksi?
- Hasil skor yang benar memiliki probabilitas yang rendah meskipun model membaca profil pertandingan dengan baik. Kami menyoroti kumpulan skor tertinggi untuk konteks; melewatkan garis yang tepat tidak membatalkan tinjauan terarah.
- Apakah ini meningkatkan rekor AI?
- Setiap kecocokan yang telah selesai dicatat dalam jalur validasi kami. Tingkat hit gabungan dan studi CLV dipublikasikan secara terpisah — halaman ini adalah jejak audit per pertandingan.
Prediksi hanya untuk tujuan informasi. Selalu bertaruh secara bertanggung jawab dan sesuai batas kemampuan Anda. Kinerja masa lalu tidak menjamin hasil di masa depan.
Jelajahi Konten Prediksi Lainnya
Dapatkan Prediksi Premium untuk Nõmme United & Trans Narva!
Buka analisis mendalam, tips taruhan eksklusif, dan prakiraan pertandingan dengan layanan langganan premium kami.
Berlangganan Sekarang
Meistriliiga — Klasemen
| # | TIM | Main | M | S | K | Poin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FC Levadia Tallinn | 29 | 22 | 6 | 1 | 72 |
| 2 | Flora Tallinn | 29 | 18 | 1 | 10 | 55 |
| 3 | Paide | 29 | 15 | 6 | 8 | 51 |
| 4 | Kalju Nomme | 29 | 15 | 5 | 9 | 50 |
| 5 | Tammeka | 29 | 14 | 2 | 13 | 44 |
| 6 | Laagri | 29 | 11 | 2 | 16 | 35 |
| 7 | Vaprus | 29 | 10 | 4 | 15 | 34 |
| 8 | Kuressaare | 29 | 8 | 5 | 16 | 29 |
| 9 | Nõmme United | 29 | 9 | 1 | 19 | 28 |
| 10 | Trans Narva | 29 | 5 | 4 | 20 | 19 |
| # | TIM | Main | Gol | Kebob | +/- | Poin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FC Levadia Tallinn | 29 | 81 | 21 | +60 | 72 |
| 2 | Flora Tallinn | 29 | 59 | 39 | +20 | 55 |
| 3 | Kalju Nomme | 29 | 52 | 27 | +25 | 50 |
| 4 | Paide | 29 | 48 | 36 | +12 | 51 |
| 5 | Nõmme United | 29 | 47 | 68 | -21 | 28 |
| 6 | Laagri | 29 | 40 | 47 | -7 | 35 |
| 7 | Vaprus | 29 | 39 | 57 | -18 | 34 |
| 8 | Tammeka | 29 | 37 | 47 | -10 | 44 |
| 9 | Kuressaare | 29 | 31 | 49 | -18 | 29 |
| 10 | Trans Narva | 29 | 22 | 65 | -43 | 19 |
