The model missed the final outcome (Colorado Springs win 2–1).
The model had projected Charleston Battery at 42.4%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Mga sinusubaybayang market kumpara sa full-time na resulta
Inihahambing ng bawat hilera ang modelong pre-match na lean sa full-time na resulta.
- palengke Hula Resulta kinalabasan
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 mga layunin) ✖ mali
- Parehong Koponan ang Mag-iskor BTTS Oo Oo ✔ Tama
- 1X2 Charleston Battery Colorado Springs ✖ mali
- Mga insight sa correct score 1-1, 0-1, 1-2, 1-0, 0-2 2-1 ✖ mali
Modelo kumpara sa Pagsasara ng Market
| kinalabasan | Modelo | Pagsasara ng Market | Pagkakaiba | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colorado Springs | 28.4% | 45.4% | -17.0 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 29.3% | 25.1% | +4.2 pp | Aligned |
| Charleston Battery | 42.4% | 29.6% | +12.8 pp | Model Edge |
The closing market estimates Colorado Springs's win probability at 45.4%, compared with the model's estimate of 28.4%, a difference of 17.0 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
Pagkatapos ng buong oras, ang resulta ay Colorado Springs win 2–1.
Market Assessment
The market is materially more optimistic about Colorado Springs than the current fair estimate.
- Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
- Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 3 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
What failed
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (3 goals)
- 1X2: model leaned Charleston Battery; match finished Colorado Springs
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Charleston Battery by 17.0 percentage points (59.4% vs model 42.4%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Timeline ng Hula
Paano lumipat ang hulang ito mula sa hula patungo sa full-time na pagsusuri.
-
Jul 26, 2026 · 19:14 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Colorado Springs 28.4% · Draw 29.2% · Charleston Battery 42.4%
- xG · Colorado Springs 1.15 — Charleston Battery 1.45
-
Jul 26, 2026 · 00:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Colorado Springs 2.10 · Draw 3.80 · Charleston Battery 3.22
- Implied 1X2 · Colorado Springs 45.4% · Draw 25.1% · Charleston Battery 29.6%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 26, 2026 · 00:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Colorado Springs 2.10 · Draw 3.80 · Charleston Battery 3.22
- Implied 1X2 · Colorado Springs 45.4% · Draw 25.1% · Charleston Battery 29.6%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 26, 2026 · 01:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Colorado Springs win · 2–1
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Makasaysayang Snapshot
Frozen sa kickoff — ang output ng modelo tulad ng nakatayo bago magsimula ang laban.
Mga sukatan bago ang tugma (konteksto sa kasaysayan)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (17 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Pricing remains divergent
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Suriin ang FAQ
- Gaano katumpak ang hula?
- Ang pahinang ito ay nagbibigay ng marka sa mga market ng direksyon (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) laban sa full-time na resulta. Ipinapakita ng marka ng hula kung gaano karami sa mga sinusubaybayang market na iyon ang tumugma sa katotohanan.
- Ano ang sinusukat ng xG Accuracy?
- Inihahambing ng xG Accuracy ang profile ng pre-match na inaasahang layunin ng modelo sa aktwal na scoreline — hindi kung tumama ang bawat market. Ang isang malakas na pagsusuri sa direksyon ay maaaring magkasamang may katamtamang marka ng katumpakan ng xG.
- Bakit hindi hinulaan ang eksaktong marka?
- Ang mga resulta ng tamang marka ay mga buntot na mababa ang posibilidad kahit na binasa nang mabuti ng modelo ang profile ng pagtutugma. Itina-highlight namin ang mga top score bin para sa konteksto; ang pagkawala ng eksaktong linya ay hindi nagpapawalang-bisa sa isang direksiyon na pagsusuri.
- Pinapabuti ba nito ang tala ng AI?
- Ang bawat natapos na laban ay naka-log in sa aming validation pipeline. Ang pinagsama-samang mga rate ng hit at pag-aaral sa CLV ay hiwalay na na-publish — ang page na ito ay ang bawat-match audit trail.
Ang mga hula ay para sa mga layuning pang-impormasyon lamang. Palaging magsugal nang responsable at sa loob ng iyong mga limitasyon. Hindi ginagarantiyahan ng nakaraang pagganap ang mga resulta sa hinaharap.
Tuklasin ang Higit Pang Nilalaman ng Prediksyon
Kumuha ng Premium na Prediksyon para sa Colorado Springs & Charleston Battery!
I-unlock ang malalim na pagsusuri, eksklusibong mga tip sa pagtaya, at mga forecast ng laro gamit ang aming premium na subscription service.
Mag-subscribe Ngayon
USL Championship — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 26 | 15 | 7 | 4 | 52 |
| 1 | Orange County SC | 16 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 28 |
| 2 | Charleston Battery | 26 | 14 | 4 | 8 | 46 |
| 2 | San Antonio | 16 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 25 |
| 3 | Detroit City | 25 | 11 | 8 | 6 | 41 |
| 3 | New Mexico United | 14 | 7 | 3 | 4 | 24 |
| 4 | Hartford Athletic | 26 | 9 | 12 | 5 | 39 |
| 4 | Colorado Springs | 15 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 22 |
| 5 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 27 | 11 | 5 | 11 | 38 |
| 5 | FC Tulsa | 14 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 22 |
| 6 | Louisville City | 26 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 37 |
| 6 | Lexington | 15 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 21 |
| 7 | Indy Eleven | 25 | 9 | 6 | 10 | 33 |
| 7 | Oakland Roots | 16 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 21 |
| 8 | Rhode Island | 24 | 9 | 5 | 10 | 32 |
| 8 | Sacramento Republic | 14 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 20 |
| 9 | Miami FC | 26 | 7 | 9 | 10 | 30 |
| 9 | Phoenix Rising | 16 | 5 | 5 | 6 | 20 |
| 10 | Birmingham Legion | 25 | 4 | 11 | 10 | 23 |
| 10 | El Paso Locomotive | 15 | 5 | 4 | 6 | 19 |
| 11 | Loudoun United | 25 | 4 | 11 | 10 | 23 |
| 11 | Las Vegas Lights | 15 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 18 |
| 12 | Brooklyn | 25 | 4 | 6 | 15 | 18 |
| 12 | Monterey Bay | 16 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 15 |
| 13 | Sporting JAX | 26 | 3 | 5 | 18 | 14 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Charleston Battery | 26 | 52 | 31 | +21 | 46 |
| 2 | Tampa Bay Rowdies | 26 | 45 | 23 | +22 | 52 |
| 3 | Louisville City | 26 | 43 | 42 | +1 | 37 |
| 4 | Birmingham Legion | 25 | 36 | 42 | -6 | 23 |
| 5 | Rhode Island | 24 | 35 | 28 | +7 | 32 |
| 6 | Indy Eleven | 25 | 32 | 31 | +1 | 33 |
| 7 | Miami FC | 26 | 32 | 43 | -11 | 30 |
| 8 | Loudoun United | 25 | 31 | 43 | -12 | 23 |
| 9 | Sporting JAX | 26 | 31 | 69 | -38 | 14 |
| 10 | Detroit City | 25 | 29 | 19 | +10 | 41 |
| 11 | Hartford Athletic | 26 | 29 | 26 | +3 | 39 |
| 12 | Pittsburgh Riverhounds | 27 | 28 | 27 | +1 | 38 |
| 13 | Colorado Springs | 15 | 26 | 22 | +4 | 22 |
| 14 | Orange County SC | 16 | 25 | 18 | +7 | 28 |
| 15 | El Paso Locomotive | 15 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 19 |
| 16 | Brooklyn | 25 | 25 | 49 | -24 | 18 |
| 17 | Lexington | 15 | 24 | 20 | +4 | 21 |
| 18 | Oakland Roots | 16 | 24 | 24 | 0 | 21 |
| 19 | Phoenix Rising | 16 | 23 | 24 | -1 | 20 |
| 20 | Las Vegas Lights | 15 | 23 | 26 | -3 | 18 |
| 21 | San Antonio | 16 | 21 | 19 | +2 | 25 |
| 22 | New Mexico United | 14 | 19 | 15 | +4 | 24 |
| 23 | FC Tulsa | 14 | 18 | 16 | +2 | 22 |
| 24 | Sacramento Republic | 14 | 16 | 14 | +2 | 20 |
| 25 | Monterey Bay | 16 | 16 | 25 | -9 | 15 |