AI correctly predicted the Beijing Guoan win.
The match finished 0–3, validating the model's directional assessment.
Mga sinusubaybayang market kumpara sa full-time na resulta
Inihahambing ng bawat hilera ang modelong pre-match na lean sa full-time na resulta.
- palengke Hula Resulta kinalabasan
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 mga layunin) ✔ Tama
- Parehong Koponan ang Mag-iskor BTTS Oo Hindi ✖ mali
- 1X2 Beijing Guoan Beijing Guoan ✔ Tama
- Mga insight sa correct score 1-1, 1-2, 2-1, 2-2, 0-1 0-3 ✖ mali
Modelo kumpara sa Pagsasara ng Market
| kinalabasan | Modelo | Pagsasara ng Market | Pagkakaiba | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shanghai Shenhua | 34.5% | 39.8% | -5.3 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 25.2% | 24.1% | +1.1 pp | Aligned |
| Beijing Guoan | 40.3% | 36.1% | +4.2 pp | Aligned |
The closing market estimates Shanghai Shenhua's win probability at 39.8%, compared with the model's estimate of 34.5%, a difference of 5.3 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
Pagkatapos ng buong oras, tumugma ang direksyon ng modelo sa resulta (Beijing Guoan win 0–3).
Market Assessment
The market and model broadly agree on Shanghai Shenhua. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 3.38) — 3 goals materialised
- Over 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
- Exact score: outside the model's top score bins
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Beijing Guoan higher (45.6% vs model 40.3%, 5.3 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Beijing Guoan win 0–3).
Timeline ng Hula
Paano lumipat ang hulang ito mula sa hula patungo sa full-time na pagsusuri.
-
Aug 18, 2026 · 19:07 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Shanghai Shenhua 34.5% · Draw 25.2% · Beijing Guoan 40.3%
- xG · Shanghai Shenhua 1.62 — Beijing Guoan 1.76
-
Jul 11, 2026 · 11:04 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Shanghai Shenhua 2.41 · Draw 4.00 · Beijing Guoan 2.67
- Implied 1X2 · Shanghai Shenhua 39.9% · Draw 24.1% · Beijing Guoan 36.0%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 11, 2026 · 11:34 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Shanghai Shenhua 2.42 · Draw 3.99 · Beijing Guoan 2.67
- Implied 1X2 · Shanghai Shenhua 39.8% · Draw 24.1% · Beijing Guoan 36.1%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 18, 2026 · 11:35 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Beijing Guoan win · 0–3
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Makasaysayang Snapshot
Frozen sa kickoff — ang output ng modelo tulad ng nakatayo bago magsimula ang laban.
Mga sukatan bago ang tugma (konteksto sa kasaysayan)
- Validation: Pass
- No strong statistical edge
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Suriin ang FAQ
- Gaano katumpak ang hula?
- Ang pahinang ito ay nagbibigay ng marka sa mga market ng direksyon (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) laban sa full-time na resulta. Ipinapakita ng marka ng hula kung gaano karami sa mga sinusubaybayang market na iyon ang tumugma sa katotohanan.
- Ano ang sinusukat ng xG Accuracy?
- Inihahambing ng xG Accuracy ang profile ng pre-match na inaasahang layunin ng modelo sa aktwal na scoreline — hindi kung tumama ang bawat market. Ang isang malakas na pagsusuri sa direksyon ay maaaring magkasamang may katamtamang marka ng katumpakan ng xG.
- Bakit hindi hinulaan ang eksaktong marka?
- Ang mga resulta ng tamang marka ay mga buntot na mababa ang posibilidad kahit na binasa nang mabuti ng modelo ang profile ng pagtutugma. Itina-highlight namin ang mga top score bin para sa konteksto; ang pagkawala ng eksaktong linya ay hindi nagpapawalang-bisa sa isang direksiyon na pagsusuri.
- Pinapabuti ba nito ang tala ng AI?
- Ang bawat natapos na laban ay naka-log in sa aming validation pipeline. Ang pinagsama-samang mga rate ng hit at pag-aaral sa CLV ay hiwalay na na-publish — ang page na ito ay ang bawat-match audit trail.
Ang mga hula ay para sa mga layuning pang-impormasyon lamang. Palaging magsugal nang responsable at sa loob ng iyong mga limitasyon. Hindi ginagarantiyahan ng nakaraang pagganap ang mga resulta sa hinaharap.
Tuklasin ang Higit Pang Nilalaman ng Prediksyon
Kumuha ng Premium na Prediksyon para sa Shanghai Shenhua & Beijing Guoan!
I-unlock ang malalim na pagsusuri, eksklusibong mga tip sa pagtaya, at mga forecast ng laro gamit ang aming premium na subscription service.
Mag-subscribe Ngayon
Super League China — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chengdu Rongcheng | 26 | 15 | 7 | 4 | 52 |
| 2 | Dalian Zhixing | 26 | 12 | 4 | 10 | 40 |
| 3 | Beijing Guoan | 26 | 11 | 10 | 5 | 38 |
| 4 | Yunnan Yukun | 26 | 11 | 5 | 10 | 38 |
| 5 | Qingdao Youth Island | 26 | 8 | 14 | 4 | 38 |
| 6 | Shandong Luneng | 26 | 13 | 4 | 9 | 37 |
| 7 | Shanghai SIPG | 26 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 33 |
| 8 | Shanghai Shenhua | 26 | 12 | 5 | 9 | 31 |
| 9 | Chongqing Tongliang Long | 26 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 31 |
| 10 | Hangzhou Greentown | 26 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 31 |
| 11 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 26 | 8 | 4 | 14 | 28 |
| 12 | Henan Jianye | 26 | 8 | 9 | 9 | 27 |
| 13 | Shenyang Urban | 26 | 7 | 4 | 15 | 25 |
| 14 | Tianjin Teda | 26 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 25 |
| 15 | Wuhan Three Towns | 26 | 5 | 11 | 10 | 21 |
| 16 | Qingdao Jonoon | 26 | 6 | 3 | 17 | 14 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yunnan Yukun | 26 | 54 | 51 | +3 | 38 |
| 2 | Shanghai Shenhua | 26 | 52 | 46 | +6 | 31 |
| 3 | Chengdu Rongcheng | 26 | 51 | 30 | +21 | 52 |
| 4 | Beijing Guoan | 26 | 49 | 33 | +16 | 38 |
| 5 | Shandong Luneng | 26 | 46 | 43 | +3 | 37 |
| 6 | Hangzhou Greentown | 26 | 45 | 43 | +2 | 31 |
| 7 | Shanghai SIPG | 26 | 40 | 33 | +7 | 33 |
| 8 | Wuhan Three Towns | 26 | 39 | 46 | -7 | 21 |
| 9 | Dalian Zhixing | 26 | 38 | 42 | -4 | 40 |
| 10 | Tianjin Teda | 26 | 36 | 32 | +4 | 25 |
| 11 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 26 | 34 | 45 | -11 | 28 |
| 12 | Shenyang Urban | 26 | 34 | 47 | -13 | 25 |
| 13 | Qingdao Jonoon | 26 | 34 | 53 | -19 | 14 |
| 14 | Henan Jianye | 26 | 33 | 35 | -2 | 27 |
| 15 | Qingdao Youth Island | 26 | 31 | 32 | -1 | 38 |
| 16 | Chongqing Tongliang Long | 26 | 27 | 32 | -5 | 31 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beijing Guoan | 26 | 4.4 | 0.1 | +4.3 | 38 |
| 2 | Shenyang Urban | 26 | 2.8 | 0.8 | +2.0 | 25 |
| 3 | Tianjin Teda | 26 | 1.5 | 0.6 | +0.9 | 25 |
| 4 | Chengdu Rongcheng | 26 | 2.1 | 1.5 | +0.6 | 52 |
| 5 | Qingdao Youth Island | 26 | 1.8 | 1.2 | +0.6 | 38 |
| 6 | Yunnan Yukun | 26 | 2.6 | 2.3 | +0.3 | 38 |
| 7 | Dalian Zhixing | 26 | 2.3 | 2.0 | +0.3 | 40 |
| 8 | Hangzhou Greentown | 26 | 1.7 | 1.5 | +0.2 | 31 |
| 9 | Shanghai Shenhua | 26 | 1.5 | 1.7 | -0.2 | 31 |
| 10 | Wuhan Three Towns | 26 | 2.0 | 2.3 | -0.3 | 21 |
| 11 | Qingdao Jonoon | 26 | 1.5 | 2.1 | -0.6 | 14 |
| 12 | Shanghai SIPG | 26 | 1.2 | 1.8 | -0.6 | 33 |
| 13 | Sichuan Jiuniu | 26 | 0.6 | 1.5 | -0.9 | 28 |
| 14 | Chongqing Tongliang Long | 26 | 0.8 | 2.8 | -2.0 | 31 |
| 15 | Shandong Luneng | 26 | 2.4 | 7.0 | -4.6 | 37 |
| 16 | Henan Jianye | 26 | — | — | — | 27 |