The model missed the final outcome (FC Copenhagen win 2–0).
The model had projected FC Nordsjælland at 43.4%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Thị trường được theo dõi so với kết quả toàn thời gian
Cấp dự đoán
F
Mỗi hàng so sánh mô hình trước trận đấu với kết quả toàn thời gian.
- Chợ Dự đoán Kết quả kết quả
- Tài / Xỉu 2.5 Tài 2.5 Xỉu 2.5 (2 mục tiêu) ✖ Không đúng
- Cả Hai Đội Đều Ghi Bàn BTTS Có Không ✖ Không đúng
- 1X2 FC Nordsjælland FC Copenhagen ✖ Không đúng
- Thông tin tỷ số chính xác 1-1, 1-2, 0-1, 2-1, 0-2 2-0 ✖ Không đúng
Mô hình so với thị trường đóng cửa
| kết quả | Người mẫu | Thị trường đóng cửa | Sự khác biệt | Tín hiệu |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FC Copenhagen | 31.7% | 43.2% | -11.5 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 24.9% | 24.8% | +0.2 pp | Aligned |
| FC Nordsjælland | 43.4% | 32.0% | +11.3 pp | Model Edge |
The closing market estimates FC Copenhagen's win probability at 43.2%, compared with the model's estimate of 31.7%, a difference of 11.5 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
Hết thời gian, kết quả là FC Copenhagen win 2–0.
Market Assessment
The market is materially more optimistic about FC Copenhagen than the current fair estimate.
- Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
- Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.
Post Match Insights
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Over 2.5; match finished Under 2.5 (2 goals)
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on FC Nordsjælland by 11.5 percentage points (54.9% vs model 43.4%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Nhà cái cao cấp stake: người mới có thể dùng mã khuyến mãi FHn2uDc1. Đăng ký ngay
Dòng thời gian dự đoán
Dự đoán này chuyển từ dự báo sang đánh giá toàn thời gian như thế nào.
-
Sep 03, 2026 · 19:13 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · FC Copenhagen 31.8% · Draw 24.9% · FC Nordsjælland 43.3%
- xG · FC Copenhagen 1.40 — FC Nordsjælland 1.93
-
Sep 03, 2026 · 17:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · FC Copenhagen 2.24 · Draw 3.91 · FC Nordsjælland 3.02
- Implied 1X2 · FC Copenhagen 43.2% · Draw 24.8% · FC Nordsjælland 32.0%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 03, 2026 · 17:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · FC Copenhagen 2.24 · Draw 3.91 · FC Nordsjælland 3.02
- Implied 1X2 · FC Copenhagen 43.2% · Draw 24.8% · FC Nordsjælland 32.0%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 03, 2026 · 18:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result FC Copenhagen win · 2–0
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Ảnh chụp lịch sử
Bị treo khi bắt đầu — kết quả đầu ra của mô hình như trước khi trận đấu bắt đầu.
Phán quyết lịch sử:
Monitor
Quyết định lịch sử
Monitor
kết quả
Missed
Số liệu trước trận đấu (bối cảnh lịch sử)
Độ tin cậy dự đoán
57/100
· Moderate
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (11 pp)
Chứng cớ
★★★★★
- No strong statistical edge
- Market has already priced much of the edge
- Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap)
14/100
Monitoring Confidence
20/100
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
2.24
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
Pending
Final Result
FC Copenhagen win · FC Copenhagen 2–0 FC Nordsjælland
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
F
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Xem lại câu hỏi thường gặp
- Dự đoán đó chính xác đến mức nào?
- Trang này xếp loại các thị trường định hướng (1X2, Trên/Dưới 2,5, BTTS) so với kết quả toàn thời gian. Mức dự đoán phản ánh có bao nhiêu thị trường được theo dõi phù hợp với thực tế.
- Độ chính xác xG đo lường điều gì?
- Độ chính xác của xG so sánh hồ sơ bàn thắng dự kiến trước trận đấu của mô hình với tỷ số thực tế — chứ không phải liệu mọi thị trường có thành công hay không. Đánh giá mang tính định hướng mạnh mẽ có thể cùng tồn tại với điểm chính xác xG vừa phải.
- Tại sao tỷ số chính xác không được dự đoán?
- Các kết quả có tỷ số chính xác là các kết quả có xác suất thấp ngay cả khi mô hình đọc tốt hồ sơ trận đấu. Chúng tôi nêu bật các thùng điểm cao nhất cho ngữ cảnh; thiếu dòng chính xác không làm mất hiệu lực của đánh giá định hướng.
- Điều này có cải thiện bản ghi AI không?
- Mỗi trận đấu kết thúc sẽ được ghi vào hệ thống xác thực của chúng tôi. Tỷ lệ trúng tổng hợp và nghiên cứu CLV được xuất bản riêng - trang này là đường dẫn kiểm tra mỗi trận đấu.
Dự đoán chỉ nhằm mục đích thông tin. Luôn đánh bạc có trách nhiệm và trong giới hạn của bạn. Hiệu suất trong quá khứ không đảm bảo kết quả trong tương lai.
Chưa có briefing AI cho trận này. Sau khi nâng cấp máy chủ, chạy lại «Tạo tỷ lệ hàng loạt» để tạo bản tóm tắt.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "d30b3fe0aa010e4295d59ee78c3d0ac8940fd3da4cb7fc090531d3613436d799",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"afp_away_win_prob": 0.4338,
"afp_draw_prob": 0.2491,
"afp_home_win_prob": 0.3171,
"away_predicted_xg": 1.93,
"away_win_prob": 0.4338,
"away_win_prob_posterior": 0.4338,
"bayes_applied": 1,
"btts_no_prob": 0.343,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.657,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2491,
"draw_prob_posterior": 0.2491,
"fair_odds_away": 2.31,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": 2.31,
"fair_odds_draw": 4.01,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": 4.01,
"fair_odds_home": 3.15,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": 3.15,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.4,
"home_win_prob": 0.3171,
"home_win_prob_posterior": 0.3171,
"over_25_prob": 0.647,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"under_25_prob": 0.353
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Double chance : FC Copenhagen or draw",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "10%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "45%",
"winner_name": "FC Copenhagen"
},
"away_xg": 1.93,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "FC Nordsj\u00e6lland",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": 0.1126,
"edge_gap": 0.1155,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.3205,
"model_prob": 0.433,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 43.3,
"draw": 24.9,
"home": 31.8
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 3.02
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 3.02,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "FC Nordsj\u00e6lland Win",
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market_fair_odds": 3.12,
"market_odds": 3.02,
"model_odds": 2.31,
"overround": 3.3,
"prob_edge": 10.2,
"value_pct": 30.7,
"value_rating": "strong_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 3,
"away_failed_to_score": 0,
"away_played": 4,
"away_score_rate": 85.5,
"home_clean_sheet": 1,
"home_failed_to_score": 1,
"home_played": 4,
"home_score_rate": 75.3,
"no_prob": 34.3,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 65.7,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"yes_prob": 65.7
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.93,
"home_expected": 1.4,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 9.7
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 9.3
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 6.9
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 6.8
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-2",
"prob": 6.7
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "FC Copenhagen or Draw",
"prob": 56.6
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "FC Copenhagen or FC Nordsj\u00e6lland",
"prob": 75.1
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or FC Nordsj\u00e6lland",
"prob": 68.3
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "FC Copenhagen or FC Nordsj\u00e6lland",
"pick_prob": 75.1
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 43.4,
"draw_pct": 24.9,
"home_pct": 31.7,
"lean_key": "away",
"lean_label": "FC Nordsj\u00e6lland"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 3.33,
"away_avg_scored": 1.5,
"confidence": "medium",
"home_avg_scored": 2.5,
"over_prob": 64.7,
"pick": "Over 2.5",
"pick_prob": 64.7,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"total_expected": 3.33,
"under_prob": 35.3
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 31.1,
"implied_prob": 33.1,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market": "FC Nordsj\u00e6lland Win",
"model_prob": 43.4,
"odds": 3.02
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "FC Nordsj\u00e6lland",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 32.05,
"draw": 24.75,
"home": 43.2
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-03 17:59:21",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-03 17:29:39",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "FC Copenhagen",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 43.2,
"gap_pp": -11.45,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 31.75
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 24.75,
"gap_pp": 0.19,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 24.94
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 32.05,
"gap_pp": 11.26,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 43.3
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 65.33,
"gap_pp": -0.63,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 64.7
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 34.67,
"gap_pp": 0.63,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 35.3
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 2.24,
"early": 2.24,
"implied_closing_pct": 43.2,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 43.2,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.91,
"early": 3.91,
"implied_closing_pct": 24.75,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 24.75,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 3.02,
"early": 3.02,
"implied_closing_pct": 32.05,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 32.05,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.47,
"early": 1.47,
"implied_closing_pct": 65.33,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 65.33,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 2.77,
"early": 2.77,
"implied_closing_pct": 34.67,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 34.67,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 11.3,
"kind": "1x2_a"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -1.7,
"ev": -0.1513,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 8.75,
"market_prob": 0.1143,
"market_prob_pct": 11.4,
"model_prob": 0.097,
"model_prob_pct": 9.7,
"n_bookmakers": 10,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 9.7
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 9.7
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 9.3
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 6.9
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 6.8
},
{
"label": "0-2",
"prob": 6.7
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.4,
"homepage_pick": {
"best_bookmaker": "Dafabet",
"best_odds": 3.25,
"confidence": "lean",
"display_label": "Away FC Nordsj\u00e6lland",
"edge": 12.5,
"ev": 58.5,
"probability": 43.3
},
"market_cards": [
{
"authority_action": "lean",
"authority_note": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"consensus_odds": 3.02,
"decision": "value_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": 0.0525,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 5.2,
"text": "+5.2%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.3205,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": 0.0525,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 5.2,
"text": "+5.2%"
},
"model_prob": 0.433,
"raw_edge_display": "+11.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 11.2,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.3077,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+30.8%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "FC Nordsj\u00e6lland",
"sort_key": 10197.25,
"tier": "best"
},
{
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"ev_available": false,
"ev_over": null,
"ev_over_display": null,
"ev_under": null,
"ev_under_display": null,
"featured": false,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": null,
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"over_prob": 64.7,
"sort_key": 4050.0,
"tier": "lean",
"under_prob": 35.3,
"value_side": "over"
},
{
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"ev_available": false,
"ev_no": null,
"ev_no_display": null,
"ev_yes": null,
"ev_yes_display": null,
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": null,
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"no_prob": 34.3,
"sort_key": 4050.0,
"tier": "lean",
"value_side": "yes",
"yes_prob": 65.7
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 809.1,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 9.7
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "6/13",
"alert_breadth_note": "6/13 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2191 +8.1%",
"alert_team": "Draw",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 11.5,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -11.49,
"hero_label": "FC Copenhagen",
"market_prob_pct": 32.0,
"market_team": "FC Copenhagen",
"model_prob_pct": 43.4,
"model_team": "FC Nordsj\u00e6lland",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "!",
"status_key": "caution",
"status_label": "Use caution",
"status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
"steam_score": 43,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "market_disagree",
"read_min": 5,
"title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
"url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 11.5,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.5,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (FC Nordsj\u00e6lland)."
},
"authority": {
"action": "lean",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 11.5,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.5,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (FC Nordsj\u00e6lland)."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0525,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3077,
"confidence_band": "Moderate",
"decision_strength": 6.2,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 5.7,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 52,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates FC Nordsj\u00e6lland at 43.3%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 32.0%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies FC Nordsj\u00e6lland as the value side (43.3%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 11.2,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u2192",
"label": "Lean only \u2014 not a default Primary",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "FC Nordsj\u00e6lland",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": null,
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side FC Nordsj\u00e6lland \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.02 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +31% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1549009 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.02 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +5.2% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +5.2% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +5.2% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 6.2/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +5.2% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 6.2/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "65 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "52 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+5.2% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 7,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (FC Nordsj\u00e6lland).",
"Decision strength: 6.2/10",
"Execution confidence below 65",
"Outlier price +31% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 65,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "lean",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0525,
"consensus_ev_display": "+5.2%",
"consensus_odds": 3.02,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.3205,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.433,
"raw_edge_display": "+11.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 11.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.33112582781456956,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.3077,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+30.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 43.0,
"reasons": [
"Clear xG separation gap=0.53"
],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "clear",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 5,
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"xg_gap": 0.53
}
}
},
"bet_status": "lean",
"books_breadth_display": "6/13",
"breadth_ratio": 0.46153846153846156,
"evidence": {
"score": 68,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift supports model side (direction only \u2014 not pricing convergence)",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation warning",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Warning",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "gap",
"label": "Large market gap (11 pp)",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift aligns with model",
"tone": "ok"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 19.3,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 4.6,
"steam_coherence": 10.0,
"validation": 14.0
},
"score": 65,
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 11.49,
"market_agreement": "weak",
"max_gap_pp": 11.49,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.93,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 43.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.4,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.93,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.40 \u00b7 Away xG 1.93 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +43%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": true,
"mv_status": "warning",
"odds_delta_pct": 8.1,
"steam_conflicts": false,
"steam_move_display": "\u2191 +8.1%",
"steam_team": "Draw",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 52,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 44,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 43,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 44,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "lean",
"label": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 11.5,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.5,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (FC Nordsj\u00e6lland)."
},
"authority": {
"action": "lean",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 11.5,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.5,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (FC Nordsj\u00e6lland)."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0525,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3077,
"confidence_band": "Moderate",
"decision_strength": 6.2,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 5.7,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 52,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates FC Nordsj\u00e6lland at 43.3%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 32.0%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies FC Nordsj\u00e6lland as the value side (43.3%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 11.2,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u2192",
"label": "Lean only \u2014 not a default Primary",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "FC Nordsj\u00e6lland",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": null,
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side FC Nordsj\u00e6lland \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.02 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +31% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1549009 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.02 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +5.2% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +5.2% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +5.2% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 6.2/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +5.2% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 6.2/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "65 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "52 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+5.2% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 7,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (FC Nordsj\u00e6lland).",
"Decision strength: 6.2/10",
"Execution confidence below 65",
"Outlier price +31% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 65,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "lean",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0525,
"consensus_ev_display": "+5.2%",
"consensus_odds": 3.02,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.3205,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.433,
"raw_edge_display": "+11.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 11.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.33112582781456956,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.3077,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+30.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 43.0,
"reasons": [
"Clear xG separation gap=0.53"
],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "clear",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 5,
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"xg_gap": 0.53
}
}
},
"headline": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u2192",
"label": "Lean only \u2014 not a default Primary",
"subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"tier": "lean"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: FC Copenhagen 1.40 xG vs FC Nordsj\u00e6lland 1.93 \u2192 FC Nordsj\u00e6lland 43.4%",
"Market: FC Copenhagen ~32.0% implied",
"Market Drift: Draw odds \u2191 +8.1%"
],
"one_liner": "FC Nordsj\u00e6lland projects stronger on expected goals (+0.53 xG edge).",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -11.49,
"fair_prob": 31.71,
"label": "FC Copenhagen",
"market_prob": 43.2,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 0.16,
"fair_prob": 24.91,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 24.75,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 11.33,
"fair_prob": 43.38,
"label": "FC Nordsj\u00e6lland",
"market_prob": 32.05,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 64.7,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 35.3,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 65.7,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 34.3,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -11.49,
"fair_prob_pct": 31.71,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "FC Copenhagen",
"market_prob_pct": 43.2,
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "Draw"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates FC Copenhagen\u0027s win probability at 43.2%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 31.7%, a difference of 11.5 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "strong",
"edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 11.49,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "strong",
"divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
"divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
"divergence_tier": "strong",
"edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "FC Nordsj\u00e6lland",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Supports model direction",
"positive": true
},
"market_prob_pct": 32.0,
"model_prob_gap_display": "+11.4 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": 11.4,
"model_prob_pct": 43.4,
"outcome_separation_tier": "medium",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "+11.4 percentage points",
"gap_pp": 11.4,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Moderate reliability",
"reliability_icon": "\u2713",
"reliability_score": 65,
"reliability_tier": "moderate",
"summary": "FC Nordsj\u00e6lland \u2014 market direction supports the model lean.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Warning",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 52,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 44,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 43,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 44,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "lean",
"label": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: FC Copenhagen 1.40 xG vs FC Nordsj\u00e6lland 1.93 \u2192 FC Nordsj\u00e6lland 43.4%",
"Market: FC Copenhagen ~32.0% implied",
"Market Drift: Draw odds \u2191 +8.1%"
],
"one_liner": "FC Nordsj\u00e6lland projects stronger on expected goals (+0.53 xG edge).",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -11.49,
"hero_label": "FC Copenhagen",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "Draw odds lengthened \u2191 +8.1%.",
"market_agreement": "weak",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.",
"Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing."
],
"follow_up": "However, Draw has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 8.1%, suggesting weakening support. Confirmation remains limited (6/13 books), suggesting early interest rather than a broad market move.",
"gap_tier": "strong",
"lead": "The market is materially more optimistic about FC Copenhagen than the current fair estimate.",
"note": "Drift away from Draw \u2014 odds lengthened by 8.1% (weakening support).",
"paragraphs": [
"The market is materially more optimistic about FC Copenhagen than the current fair estimate.",
"However, Draw has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 8.1%, suggesting weakening support. Confirmation remains limited (6/13 books), suggesting early interest rather than a broad market move.",
"Drift away from Draw \u2014 odds lengthened by 8.1% (weakening support)."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The market favors FC Copenhagen more strongly than the current fair estimate.",
"At the same time, Draw has drifted \u2014 odds lengthened by 8.1%, suggesting weakening support.",
"Market confirmation remains limited (6/13), suggesting an early move rather than a broad consensus."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 11.49,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
"status": "warning"
},
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Favourite exceeds second outcome by 11.7 pp (at 43.4%)."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 11.7,
"max_prob_pct": 43.4,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "medium",
"tier_label": "Medium"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Medium",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "strong",
"largest_gap_label": "FC Copenhagen",
"largest_gap_pp": -11.5,
"lead": "The closing market prices FC Copenhagen higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 11.5,
"title": "Strong Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -11.49,
"edge_pp": -11.49,
"fair_prob_pct": 31.71,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "FC Copenhagen",
"market_prob_pct": 43.2,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 0.16,
"edge_pp": 0.16,
"fair_prob_pct": 24.91,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 24.75,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 11.33,
"edge_pp": 11.33,
"fair_prob_pct": 43.38,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "FC Nordsj\u00e6lland",
"market_prob_pct": 32.05,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "model_edge",
"signal_label": "Model Edge"
}
],
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "Drift away from Draw \u2014 odds lengthened by 8.1% (weakening support).",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers FC Copenhagen (32.0%).",
"Draw odds have drifted longer across books (\u2191 +8.1%, 6/13) \u2014 market pricing moves against this side.",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 FC Nordsj\u00e6lland, Market \u2192 FC Copenhagen, while Draw odds drifted longer (market fade).",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 44.64,
"closing_odds": 2.24,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 44.64,
"entry_odds": 2.24,
"match_phase": "live",
"match_phase_detail": "2H",
"match_phase_display": "Live \u00b7 2H",
"match_phase_label": "Live",
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"model_validation_status": "warning",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 6,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 9,
"bookmaker_name": "Dafabet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +10.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 10.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +8.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 8.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 1,
"bookmaker_name": "10Bet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +4.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": 4.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 7,
"bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.8%",
"odds_delta_pct": 2.8
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 36,
"bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.7%",
"odds_delta_pct": 2.7
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.6%",
"odds_delta_pct": 2.6
}
],
"books_total": 13,
"breadth_display": "6/13",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 4.0,
"is_drift": true,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2191 +8.1%",
"move_pct_abs": 8.1,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 87h 15m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"Bet365 led repricing on Draw (8.1%) \u2014 sharp book moved before wider follow-through.",
"Sharper sportsbooks initiated the move, but wider market participation remains limited."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": 8.1,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"4.00",
"3.85",
"3.70"
],
"display": "4.10 \u2192 3.26 \u2192 4.00",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 87h 15m",
"pick_team": "Draw",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "4.10"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "3.26"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "4.00"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
3.7,
3.91,
4.0
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 28.0,5.4 56.0,0.0",
"sparkline_trend": "up",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way rise",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.70"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "3.70"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "4.00"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "4.00"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 3.7,
"page_alert_line": "Broad drift across 6/13 sportsbooks on Draw",
"phase_label": "Sharp repricing",
"phase_tip": "Aggressive adjustment \u2014 often sharp-led or high consensus.",
"pick_team": "Draw",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "",
"sharp_leader": "Bet365",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "confirm",
"signal_icon": "\u26a1",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 4.0,
"is_drift": true,
"label": "Market Signal",
"move_display": "\u2191 +8.1%",
"open_odds": 3.7,
"summary": "Broad market drift supports the same direction as the model lean.",
"team": "Draw",
"tone": "with"
},
"signal_key": "sharp_led",
"signal_label": "Sharp-led move",
"steam_score": 43,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "6/13",
"current_odds": 4.0,
"move_display": "\u2191 +8.1%",
"open_odds": 3.7,
"pick_team": "Draw",
"steam_score": 43,
"steam_team_name": "Draw",
"steam_tier": "B"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 11.5,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": 0,
"away_team_display_name": "FC Nordsj\u00e6lland",
"away_team_id": 398,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/398.webp",
"away_team_name": "FC Nordsj\u00e6lland",
"away_team_public_id": "17geoX58udXqKG",
"away_team_slug": "fc-nordsjaelland",
"country_code": "DK",
"country_display_name": "Denmark",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/dk.svg",
"country_id": 44,
"country_name": "Denmark",
"fixture_id": 1549009,
"goals_away": 0,
"goals_home": 2,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": 2,
"home_team_country": "Denmark",
"home_team_display_name": "FC Copenhagen",
"home_team_id": 400,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/400.webp",
"home_team_name": "FC Copenhagen",
"home_team_public_id": "1h8UV6HfQBY3jD",
"home_team_slug": "fc-copenhagen",
"league_country": "Denmark",
"league_country_display": "Denmark",
"league_display_name": "Superliga \u0110an M\u1ea1ch",
"league_id": 119,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/119.webp",
"league_name": "Superliga \u0110an M\u1ea1ch",
"league_public_id": "3B9QcEGIlTlsUe",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-03 18:00:00",
"public_id": "2nsPZx6jitd6Ck",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Second Half",
"status_short": "2H",
"venue_city": "Copenhagen",
"venue_name": "Parken Stadium"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.5
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.2493,
"best_odd": 3.02,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0281,
"ev": 0.0525,
"implied_prob": 0.3205,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3205,
"draw": 0.2475,
"home": 0.432
},
"model_prob": 0.433,
"p_final": 0.3485
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2991,
"best_odd": 3.91,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0006,
"ev": -0.03,
"implied_prob": 0.2475,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3205,
"draw": 0.2475,
"home": 0.432
},
"model_prob": 0.2494,
"p_final": 0.2481
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.3727,
"best_odd": 2.24,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0427,
"ev": -0.1278,
"implied_prob": 0.432,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3205,
"draw": 0.2475,
"home": 0.432
},
"model_prob": 0.3175,
"p_final": 0.3894
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 3.02,
"edge": 0.1019,
"ev": 0.3077,
"implied_prob": 0.3311,
"model_prob": 0.433
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.91,
"edge": -0.0063,
"ev": -0.0247,
"implied_prob": 0.2558,
"model_prob": 0.2494
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 2.24,
"edge": -0.1289,
"ev": -0.2887,
"implied_prob": 0.4464,
"model_prob": 0.3175
}
},
"btts": {
"btts_ev_mode": "unavailable",
"ev_available": false,
"market_first": {
"available": false
},
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"reliability": "low"
},
"ou25": {
"ev_available": false,
"market_first": {
"available": false
},
"n_bookmakers": 0,
"ou_ev_mode": "unavailable",
"reliability": "low"
}
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 3.33,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0525,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3077,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.0525,
"confidence": 5.0,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"score": 6.2,
"score_v1_legacy": 5.0,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 5.7,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"score": 6.2,
"score_pre_penalty": 5.7
},
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "B",
"stake_factor": 0.5
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "lean",
"final_decision": {
"action": "lean",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 11.5,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 11.5,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (FC Nordsj\u00e6lland)."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0525,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3077,
"confidence_band": "Moderate",
"decision_strength": 6.2,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 5.7,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 52,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates FC Nordsj\u00e6lland at 43.3%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 32.0%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies FC Nordsj\u00e6lland as the value side (43.3%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 11.2,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Selective Lean - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u2192",
"label": "Lean only \u2014 not a default Primary",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "FC Nordsj\u00e6lland",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": null,
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market 1X2 \u00b7 side FC Nordsj\u00e6lland \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.02 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +31% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1549009 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.02 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +5.2% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +5.2% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +5.2% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 6.2/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +5.2% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 6.2/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "65 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "52 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+5.2% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 7,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (FC Nordsj\u00e6lland).",
"Decision strength: 6.2/10",
"Execution confidence below 65",
"Outlier price +31% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 65,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"subline": "Selective consensus value may exist \u2014 below default Primary sizing bar.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "lean",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0525,
"consensus_ev_display": "+5.2%",
"consensus_odds": 3.02,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.3205,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.433,
"raw_edge_display": "+11.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 11.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.33112582781456956,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.3077,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+30.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 43.0,
"reasons": [
"Clear xG separation gap=0.53"
],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "clear",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 5,
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"xg_gap": 0.53
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5927\u5f00\u5927\u5408\uff08\u8fdb\u7403\u578b\uff09",
"scoring_type": "high_scoring",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.657,
"draw_prob": 0.2494,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.433,
"over_prob": 0.647,
"total_xg": 3.33,
"under_prob": 0.353,
"xg_diff": 0.53
},
"type": "high_scoring",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 3.02,
"decision": "value_bet",
"edge": 0.0281,
"ev": 0.0525,
"implied_prob": 0.3205,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.433,
"side": "away",
"side_label": "FC Nordsj\u00e6lland"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"edge": null,
"ev": null,
"implied_prob": null,
"model_prob": 0.657,
"side": "yes",
"value_side": "yes"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"available": false
},
"edge": null,
"ev": null,
"implied_prob": null,
"model_prob": 0.647,
"side": "over",
"value_side": "over"
}
},
"match_id": 1549009,
"match_regime": {
"action": "optional",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": false,
"code": "thin_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.0525,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 0.25,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.433,
"draw": 0.2494,
"home": 0.3175
},
"reason_codes": [
"high_total_goals"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "FC Nordsj\u00e6lland",
"home": "FC Copenhagen"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.018186,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0525,
"implied_prob": 0.3205,
"market": "1x2",
"model_prob": 0.433,
"not_dominant": true,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "away",
"side_label": "FC Nordsj\u00e6lland",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 1,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": 0.0525,
"consensus_ev_display": "+5.2%",
"consensus_odds": 3.02,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.3205,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.433,
"raw_edge_display": "+11.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 11.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.33112582781456956,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.3077,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+30.8%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1549009,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-03T19:13:36.919586+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Khám phá thêm nội dung dự đoán
Nhận dự đoán cao cấp cho FC Copenhagen & FC Nordsjælland!
Mở khóa phân tích chuyên sâu, mẹo cá cược độc quyền và dự đoán trận đấu với dịch vụ đăng ký cao cấp của chúng tôi.
Đăng ký ngay
Superliga Đan Mạch — Bảng xếp hạng
| # | Đội | Tr | T | H | B | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FC Copenhagen | 9 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 24 |
| 2 | FC Midtjylland | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 19 |
| 3 | Viborg FF | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 17 |
| 4 | FC Nordsjælland | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 17 |
| 5 | Brøndby | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 13 |
| 6 | AC Horsens | 9 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 11 |
| 7 | Silkeborg IF | 9 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 10 |
| 8 | Randers FC | 9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 10 |
| 9 | Odense BK | 9 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 9 |
| 10 | Lyngby BK | 9 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 7 |
| 11 | Aarhus | 9 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 5 |
| 12 | SønderjyskE | 9 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 |
| # | Đội | Tr | BT | BB | +/- | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FC Copenhagen | 9 | 23 | 8 | +15 | 24 |
| 2 | FC Midtjylland | 9 | 17 | 9 | +8 | 19 |
| 3 | Viborg FF | 9 | 15 | 8 | +7 | 17 |
| 4 | AC Horsens | 9 | 15 | 16 | -1 | 11 |
| 5 | FC Nordsjælland | 9 | 14 | 10 | +4 | 17 |
| 6 | Silkeborg IF | 9 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 10 |
| 7 | Brøndby | 9 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 13 |
| 8 | SønderjyskE | 9 | 12 | 21 | -9 | 5 |
| 9 | Randers FC | 9 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 10 |
| 10 | Aarhus | 9 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 5 |
| 11 | Lyngby BK | 9 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 7 |
| 12 | Odense BK | 9 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 9 |
| # | Đội | Tr | xG | xGC | +/- | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FC Nordsjælland | 9 | 15.9 | 7.0 | +8.9 | 17 |
| 2 | Lyngby BK | 9 | 12.2 | 8.1 | +4.1 | 7 |
| 3 | Viborg FF | 9 | 9.7 | 6.4 | +3.3 | 17 |
| 4 | FC Midtjylland | 9 | 9.3 | 6.3 | +3.0 | 19 |
| 5 | Aarhus | 9 | 8.5 | 6.3 | +2.2 | 5 |
| 6 | FC Copenhagen | 9 | 6.6 | 6.3 | +0.3 | 24 |
| 7 | Brøndby | 9 | 8.9 | 9.8 | -0.9 | 13 |
| 8 | Odense BK | 9 | 8.7 | 9.7 | -1.0 | 9 |
| 9 | Silkeborg IF | 9 | 6.2 | 9.8 | -3.6 | 10 |
| 10 | AC Horsens | 9 | 7.3 | 11.3 | -4.0 | 11 |
| 11 | Randers FC | 9 | 5.8 | 11.6 | -5.8 | 10 |
| 12 | SønderjyskE | 9 | 5.9 | 12.2 | -6.3 | 5 |
