The model missed the final outcome (Cittadella win 2–1).
The model had projected Lumezzane at 38.5%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Thị trường được theo dõi so với kết quả toàn thời gian
Mỗi hàng so sánh mô hình trước trận đấu với kết quả toàn thời gian.
- Chợ Dự đoán Kết quả kết quả
- Tài / Xỉu 2.5 Xỉu 2.5 Tài 2.5 (3 mục tiêu) ✖ Không đúng
- Cả Hai Đội Đều Ghi Bàn BTTS Có Có ✔ Chính xác
- 1X2 Lumezzane Cittadella ✖ Không đúng
- Thông tin tỷ số chính xác 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 2-1 ✔ Chính xác
Mô hình so với thị trường đóng cửa
| kết quả | Người mẫu | Thị trường đóng cửa | Sự khác biệt | Tín hiệu |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cittadella | 31.9% | 52.6% | -20.7 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 29.6% | 26.5% | +3.0 pp | Aligned |
| Lumezzane | 38.5% | 20.9% | +17.6 pp | Model Edge |
The closing market estimates Cittadella's win probability at 52.6%, compared with the model's estimate of 31.9%, a difference of 20.7 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
Hết thời gian, kết quả là Cittadella win 2–1.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 3 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
- Exact score 2–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins
What failed
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (3 goals)
- 1X2: model leaned Lumezzane; match finished Cittadella
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Lumezzane by 20.7 percentage points (59.2% vs model 38.5%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Dòng thời gian dự đoán
Dự đoán này chuyển từ dự báo sang đánh giá toàn thời gian như thế nào.
-
Sep 06, 2026 · 19:00 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Cittadella 31.9% · Draw 29.6% · Lumezzane 38.5%
- xG · Cittadella 1.23 — Lumezzane 1.37
-
Sep 06, 2026 · 18:31 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Cittadella 1.76 · Draw 3.49 · Lumezzane 4.44
- Implied 1X2 · Cittadella 52.6% · Draw 26.5% · Lumezzane 20.9%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 06, 2026 · 19:00 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Cittadella 1.76 · Draw 3.49 · Lumezzane 4.44
- Implied 1X2 · Cittadella 52.6% · Draw 26.5% · Lumezzane 20.9%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 06, 2026 · 19:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Cittadella win · 2–1
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Ảnh chụp lịch sử
Bị treo khi bắt đầu — kết quả đầu ra của mô hình như trước khi trận đấu bắt đầu.
Nhãn lịch sử: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".
Số liệu trước trận đấu (bối cảnh lịch sử)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (21 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Pricing remains divergent
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Xem lại câu hỏi thường gặp
- Dự đoán đó chính xác đến mức nào?
- Trang này xếp loại các thị trường định hướng (1X2, Trên/Dưới 2,5, BTTS) so với kết quả toàn thời gian. Mức dự đoán phản ánh có bao nhiêu thị trường được theo dõi phù hợp với thực tế.
- Độ chính xác xG đo lường điều gì?
- Độ chính xác của xG so sánh hồ sơ bàn thắng dự kiến trước trận đấu của mô hình với tỷ số thực tế — chứ không phải liệu mọi thị trường có thành công hay không. Đánh giá mang tính định hướng mạnh mẽ có thể cùng tồn tại với điểm chính xác xG vừa phải.
- Tại sao tỷ số chính xác không được dự đoán?
- Các kết quả có tỷ số chính xác là các kết quả có xác suất thấp ngay cả khi mô hình đọc tốt hồ sơ trận đấu. Chúng tôi nêu bật các thùng điểm cao nhất cho ngữ cảnh; thiếu dòng chính xác không làm mất hiệu lực của đánh giá định hướng.
- Điều này có cải thiện bản ghi AI không?
- Mỗi trận đấu kết thúc sẽ được ghi vào hệ thống xác thực của chúng tôi. Tỷ lệ trúng tổng hợp và nghiên cứu CLV được xuất bản riêng - trang này là đường dẫn kiểm tra mỗi trận đấu.
Dự đoán chỉ nhằm mục đích thông tin. Luôn đánh bạc có trách nhiệm và trong giới hạn của bạn. Hiệu suất trong quá khứ không đảm bảo kết quả trong tương lai.
Chưa có briefing AI cho trận này. Sau khi nâng cấp máy chủ, chạy lại «Tạo tỷ lệ hàng loạt» để tạo bản tóm tắt.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "f24f693cf37400ba0c9e39c1db84503a539964ca71e89a9ab7875d07733caf88",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.37,
"away_win_prob": 0.3849,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.456,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.544,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2957,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.6,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.38,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 3.13,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.23,
"home_win_prob": 0.3194,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Winner : Cittadella",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "10%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "45%",
"winner_name": "Cittadella"
},
"away_xg": 1.37,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Lumezzane",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": 0.1761,
"edge_gap": 0.0651,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.2086,
"model_prob": 0.3846,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 38.5,
"draw": 29.6,
"home": 32.0
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 4.44
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 4.44,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Lumezzane Win",
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market_fair_odds": 4.79,
"market_odds": 4.44,
"model_odds": 2.6,
"overround": 8.0,
"prob_edge": 15.9,
"value_pct": 70.8,
"value_rating": "strong_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 1,
"away_failed_to_score": 1,
"away_played": 2,
"away_score_rate": 74.6,
"home_clean_sheet": 1,
"home_failed_to_score": 0,
"home_played": 1,
"home_score_rate": 70.8,
"no_prob": 45.6,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 54.4,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 54.4
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.37,
"home_expected": 1.23,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 10.2
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.1
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.6
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 7.7
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Cittadella or Draw",
"prob": 61.5
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Cittadella or Lumezzane",
"prob": 70.4
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Lumezzane",
"prob": 68.1
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Cittadella or Lumezzane",
"pick_prob": 70.4
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 38.5,
"draw_pct": 29.6,
"home_pct": 31.9,
"lean_key": "away",
"lean_label": "Lumezzane"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 0.5,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 2.0,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Under 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 70.9,
"implied_prob": 22.5,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Lumezzane Win",
"model_prob": 38.5,
"odds": 4.44
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Lumezzane",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 20.86,
"draw": 26.53,
"home": 52.61
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-06 19:00:05",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-06 18:31:18",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Cittadella",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 52.61,
"gap_pp": -20.66,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 31.95
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 26.53,
"gap_pp": 3.05,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 29.59
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 20.86,
"gap_pp": 17.61,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 38.46
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 48.29,
"gap_pp": -0.09,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 48.2
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 51.71,
"gap_pp": 0.09,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 51.8
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 1.76,
"early": 1.76,
"implied_closing_pct": 52.61,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 52.61,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.49,
"early": 3.49,
"implied_closing_pct": 26.53,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 26.53,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 4.44,
"early": 4.44,
"implied_closing_pct": 20.86,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 20.86,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.97,
"early": 1.97,
"implied_closing_pct": 48.29,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 48.29,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 1.84,
"early": 1.84,
"implied_closing_pct": 51.71,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 51.71,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 17.6,
"kind": "1x2_a"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -1.8,
"ev": -0.125,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 7.0,
"market_prob": 0.1429,
"market_prob_pct": 14.3,
"model_prob": 0.125,
"model_prob_pct": 12.5,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 10.2
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.1
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.6
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 7.7
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.23,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2102,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.825,
"edge": 0.0092,
"edge_pp": 0.9,
"market_prob": 0.5,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.544,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2102,
"best_odd": 1.825,
"edge": -0.0092,
"ev": -0.1044,
"implied_prob": 0.5,
"model_prob": 0.456,
"p_final": 0.4908
},
"p_final": 0.5092,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 4.4,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0072,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0706,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2102,
"best_odd": 1.825,
"edge": 0.0092,
"ev": -0.0706,
"implied_prob": 0.5,
"model_prob": 0.544,
"p_final": 0.5092
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.1564,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -15.6,
"text": "-15.6%"
},
"ev_yes": 0.088,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 8.8,
"text": "+8.8%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.088,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no_prob": 45.6,
"sort_key": 10229.2,
"tier": "best",
"value_side": "yes",
"yes_prob": 54.4
},
{
"authority_action": "wait",
"authority_note": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
"consensus_odds": 4.44,
"decision": "value_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"ev": 0.041,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 4.1,
"text": "+4.1%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.2086,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": 0.041,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 4.1,
"text": "+4.1%"
},
"model_prob": 0.3846,
"raw_edge_display": "+17.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 17.6,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.7076,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+70.8%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Lumezzane",
"sort_key": 10036.9,
"tier": "best"
},
{
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2474,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.78,
"edge": 0.0001,
"edge_pp": 0.0,
"market_prob": 0.5176,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2249,
"best_odd": 1.91,
"edge": -0.0001,
"ev": -0.0788,
"implied_prob": 0.4824,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.4823
},
"p_final": 0.5177,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 0.0,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.078,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0785,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2474,
"best_odd": 1.78,
"edge": 0.0001,
"ev": -0.0785,
"implied_prob": 0.5176,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.5177
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.0505,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -5.1,
"text": "-5.1%"
},
"ev_under": -0.0417,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -4.2,
"text": "-4.2%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": -0.0417,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 1789.575,
"tier": "bad_ev",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "under"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.5,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.5
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "",
"alert_breadth_note": "",
"alert_move": "",
"alert_team": "",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 20.7,
"has_alert": false,
"hero_edge_pp": -20.67,
"hero_label": "Cittadella",
"market_prob_pct": 20.9,
"market_team": "Cittadella",
"model_prob_pct": 38.5,
"model_team": "Lumezzane",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "!",
"status_key": "caution",
"status_label": "Use caution",
"status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
"steam_score": null,
"steam_subtitle": "",
"steam_tier": "",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "market_disagree",
"read_min": 5,
"title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
"url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 20.7,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 20.7,
"summary": "The market has repriced Cittadella, but the model still strongly favours Lumezzane."
},
"authority": {
"action": "wait",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 20.7,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 20.7,
"summary": "The market has repriced Cittadella, but the model still strongly favours Lumezzane."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.088,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.7078,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 17,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Lumezzane at 38.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 20.9%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Lumezzane as the value side (38.5%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 17.6,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u23f8",
"label": "Wait for validation",
"market_signal": "The market has repriced Cittadella, but the model still strongly favours Lumezzane.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Lumezzane",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "probability_gap",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market BTTS \u00b7 side Lumezzane \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.14 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +71% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1608254 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.14 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +8.8% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +8.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +8.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +8.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "61 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "17 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+8.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": false,
"value": "false"
}
],
"passed": 4,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has repriced Cittadella, but the model still strongly favours Lumezzane.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +71% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 61,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "wait",
"validation_ok": false,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.041,
"consensus_ev_display": "+4.1%",
"consensus_odds": 4.44,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.2086,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3846,
"raw_edge_display": "+17.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 17.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.2252252252252252,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.7076,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+70.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 1.5,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.14"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.14
}
}
},
"bet_status": "wait",
"books_breadth_display": "6/6",
"breadth_ratio": 1.0,
"evidence": {
"score": 55,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Recent market move conflicts with the model favourite",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Sharp steam detected",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation warning",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Warning",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "gap",
"label": "Large market gap (21 pp)",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 14.7,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 10.0,
"steam_coherence": 5.0,
"validation": 14.0
},
"score": 61,
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 20.67,
"market_agreement": "weak",
"max_gap_pp": 20.67,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.37,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 1.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.23,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.37,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.23 \u00b7 Away xG 1.37 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +1%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": false,
"mv_status": "warning",
"odds_delta_pct": 0.0,
"steam_conflicts": null,
"steam_move_display": "+0.0%",
"steam_team": "Cittadella",
"suppress_execution": true,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 17,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 4,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 38,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 4,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "wait",
"label": "Wait - No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has repriced Cittadella, but the model still strongly favours Lumezzane.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 20.7,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 20.7,
"summary": "The market has repriced Cittadella, but the model still strongly favours Lumezzane."
},
"authority": {
"action": "wait",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 20.7,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 20.7,
"summary": "The market has repriced Cittadella, but the model still strongly favours Lumezzane."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.088,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.7078,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 17,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Lumezzane at 38.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 20.9%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Lumezzane as the value side (38.5%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 17.6,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u23f8",
"label": "Wait for validation",
"market_signal": "The market has repriced Cittadella, but the model still strongly favours Lumezzane.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Lumezzane",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "probability_gap",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market BTTS \u00b7 side Lumezzane \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.14 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +71% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1608254 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.14 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +8.8% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +8.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +8.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +8.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "61 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "17 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+8.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": false,
"value": "false"
}
],
"passed": 4,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has repriced Cittadella, but the model still strongly favours Lumezzane.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +71% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 61,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "wait",
"validation_ok": false,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.041,
"consensus_ev_display": "+4.1%",
"consensus_odds": 4.44,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.2086,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3846,
"raw_edge_display": "+17.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 17.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.2252252252252252,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.7076,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+70.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 1.5,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.14"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.14
}
}
},
"headline": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u23f8",
"label": "Wait for validation",
"subline": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
"tier": "wait"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Cittadella 1.23 xG vs Lumezzane 1.37 \u2192 Lumezzane 38.5%",
"Market: Cittadella ~20.9% implied",
"Market Steam: Cittadella +0.0%"
],
"one_liner": "Model leans Lumezzane, but market pricing diverges by 21 pp.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -20.67,
"fair_prob": 31.94,
"label": "Cittadella",
"market_prob": 52.61,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 3.04,
"fair_prob": 29.57,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 26.53,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 17.63,
"fair_prob": 38.49,
"label": "Lumezzane",
"market_prob": 20.86,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": -0.17,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 48.37,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": 0.17,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 51.63,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": 5.05,
"fair_prob": 54.4,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 49.35,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": -5.05,
"fair_prob": 45.6,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 50.65,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "extreme_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -20.67,
"fair_prob_pct": 31.94,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "Cittadella",
"market_prob_pct": 52.61,
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "Cittadella"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Cittadella\u0027s win probability at 52.6%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 31.9%, a difference of 20.7 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "extreme",
"edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 20.67,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": true
},
"divergence_label": "Extreme model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "extreme",
"divergence_level_label": "Extreme divergence",
"divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs substantially from current market pricing. Large divergences can occur when rating inputs are incomplete, team-strength estimates are uncertain, or the market incorporates information not present in the model. Interpret with caution.",
"divergence_tier": "extreme",
"edge_label": "Extreme disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "extreme_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Lumezzane",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 20.9,
"model_prob_gap_display": "+17.6 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": 17.6,
"model_prob_pct": 38.5,
"outcome_separation_tier": "medium",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "+17.6 percentage points",
"gap_pp": 17.6,
"label": "Low convergence",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_low"
},
"reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
"reliability_icon": "!",
"reliability_score": 61,
"reliability_tier": "limited",
"summary": "The market has repriced Cittadella, but the model still strongly favours Lumezzane. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Warning",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 17,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 4,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 38,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 4,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "wait",
"label": "Wait - No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Cittadella 1.23 xG vs Lumezzane 1.37 \u2192 Lumezzane 38.5%",
"Market: Cittadella ~20.9% implied",
"Market Steam: Cittadella +0.0%"
],
"one_liner": "Model leans Lumezzane, but market pricing diverges by 21 pp.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -20.67,
"hero_label": "Cittadella",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "No meaningful directional movement yet.",
"market_agreement": "weak",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_interpretation": {},
"market_narrative": {},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 20.67,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
"status": "warning"
},
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Favourite exceeds second outcome by 6.6 pp (at 38.5%)."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 6.6,
"max_prob_pct": 38.5,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "medium",
"tier_label": "Medium"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Medium",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "extreme",
"largest_gap_label": "Cittadella",
"largest_gap_pp": -20.7,
"lead": "The closing market prices Cittadella higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "extreme",
"max_gap_pp": 20.7,
"title": "Strong Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -20.67,
"edge_pp": -20.67,
"fair_prob_pct": 31.94,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Cittadella",
"market_prob_pct": 52.61,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 3.04,
"edge_pp": 3.04,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.57,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 26.53,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 17.63,
"edge_pp": 17.63,
"fair_prob_pct": 38.49,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Lumezzane",
"market_prob_pct": 20.86,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "model_edge",
"signal_label": "Model Edge"
}
],
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Cittadella (20.9%).",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Lumezzane, Market \u2192 Cittadella, Recent sharp money \u2192 recent line movement.",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 56.82,
"closing_odds": 1.76,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 56.82,
"entry_odds": 1.76,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"model_validation_status": "warning",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"show": false
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "6/6",
"current_odds": 1.7,
"move_display": "+0.0%",
"open_odds": 1.7,
"pick_team": "Cittadella",
"steam_score": 30,
"steam_team_name": "Cittadella",
"steam_tier": "C"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 20.7,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Lumezzane",
"away_team_id": 1689,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/1689.webp",
"away_team_name": "Lumezzane",
"away_team_public_id": "3fgF7EtQM3A5ys",
"away_team_slug": "lumezzane",
"country_code": "IT",
"country_display_name": "Italy",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/it.svg",
"country_id": 79,
"country_name": "Italy",
"fixture_id": 1608254,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Italy",
"home_team_display_name": "Cittadella",
"home_team_id": 510,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/510.webp",
"home_team_name": "Cittadella",
"home_team_public_id": "3JvkcxO67KEOBk",
"home_team_slug": "cittadella",
"league_country": "Italy",
"league_country_display": "Italy",
"league_display_name": "Serie C - Girone A",
"league_id": 138,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/138.webp",
"league_name": "Serie C - Girone A",
"league_public_id": "2TIxevBvcuUZGk",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-06 19:00:00",
"public_id": "5Nd5Dh1rxxgbRl",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Cittadella",
"venue_name": "Stadio Pier Cesare Tombolato"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.1472,
"best_odd": 4.44,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0259,
"ev": 0.041,
"implied_prob": 0.2086,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2086,
"draw": 0.2653,
"home": 0.5261
},
"model_prob": 0.3846,
"p_final": 0.2345
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2863,
"best_odd": 3.49,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0087,
"ev": -0.0435,
"implied_prob": 0.2653,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2086,
"draw": 0.2653,
"home": 0.5261
},
"model_prob": 0.2959,
"p_final": 0.2741
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.414,
"best_odd": 1.76,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0855,
"ev": -0.2246,
"implied_prob": 0.5261,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2086,
"draw": 0.2653,
"home": 0.5261
},
"model_prob": 0.3195,
"p_final": 0.4406
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 4.44,
"edge": 0.1594,
"ev": 0.7078,
"implied_prob": 0.2252,
"model_prob": 0.3846
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.49,
"edge": 0.0093,
"ev": 0.0326,
"implied_prob": 0.2865,
"model_prob": 0.2959
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 1.76,
"edge": -0.2487,
"ev": -0.4377,
"implied_prob": 0.5682,
"model_prob": 0.3195
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.2102,
"alpha_yes": 0.2102,
"best_no_odd": 1.85,
"best_yes_odd": 2.0,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": -0.0505,
"edge_yes": 0.0505,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.1564,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.1044,
"ev_yes": 0.088,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0706,
"implied_no": 0.5065,
"implied_yes": 0.4935,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2102,
"best_odd": 1.825,
"edge": -0.0092,
"ev": -0.1044,
"implied_prob": 0.5,
"model_prob": 0.456,
"p_final": 0.4908
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2102,
"best_odd": 1.825,
"edge": 0.0092,
"ev": -0.0706,
"implied_prob": 0.5,
"model_prob": 0.544,
"p_final": 0.5092
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"p_final_no": 0.4908,
"p_final_yes": 0.5092,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.2249,
"alpha_under": 0.2474,
"best_over_odd": 1.97,
"best_under_odd": 1.85,
"consensus_over_odd": 1.91,
"consensus_under_odd": 1.78,
"edge_over": -0.0017,
"edge_under": 0.0017,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.0505,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.0788,
"ev_under": -0.0417,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.0785,
"implied_over": 0.4837,
"implied_over_mf": 0.4824,
"implied_under": 0.5163,
"implied_under_mf": 0.5176,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2249,
"best_odd": 1.91,
"edge": -0.0001,
"ev": -0.0788,
"implied_prob": 0.4824,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.4823
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2474,
"best_odd": 1.78,
"edge": 0.0001,
"ev": -0.0785,
"implied_prob": 0.5176,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.5177
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.4823,
"p_final_under": 0.5177,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.088,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.7078,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.088,
"confidence": 5.5,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"guard_capped": true,
"score": 3.0,
"score_before_guard": 5.5,
"score_v1_legacy": 3.0,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.0,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_pre_penalty": 3.0
},
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "wait",
"final_decision": {
"action": "wait",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 20.7,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 20.7,
"summary": "The market has repriced Cittadella, but the model still strongly favours Lumezzane."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.088,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.7078,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.0,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 17,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Lumezzane at 38.5%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 20.9%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Lumezzane as the value side (38.5%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 17.6,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Wait - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u23f8",
"label": "Wait for validation",
"market_signal": "The market has repriced Cittadella, but the model still strongly favours Lumezzane.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Lumezzane",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "probability_gap",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market BTTS \u00b7 side Lumezzane \u00b7 decimal odds ~3.14 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +71% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1608254 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22483.14 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +8.8% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +8.8% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +8.8% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +8.8% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "61 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "17 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+8.8% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": false,
"value": "false"
}
],
"passed": 4,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has repriced Cittadella, but the model still strongly favours Lumezzane.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +71% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 61,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Model validation or guard rules block actionable value signals.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "wait",
"validation_ok": false,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.041,
"consensus_ev_display": "+4.1%",
"consensus_odds": 4.44,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.2086,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3846,
"raw_edge_display": "+17.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 17.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.2252252252252252,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.7076,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+70.8%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": 1.5,
"reasons": [
"Thin xG separation gap=0.14"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "low",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": -10,
"strength_delta": -1.0,
"xg_gap": 0.14
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.544,
"draw_prob": 0.2959,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.3846,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.14
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"guard_active": true,
"guard_level": "extreme",
"guard_message": "Model validation failed \u2014 value signals on 1X2 are not actionable until inputs are verified.",
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 4.44,
"decision": "guard_blocked",
"decision_before_guard": "value_bet",
"edge": 0.0259,
"ev": 0.041,
"guard_blocked": true,
"implied_prob": 0.2086,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.3846,
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Lumezzane"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "guard_blocked",
"decision_before_guard": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2102,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.825,
"edge": 0.0092,
"market_prob": 0.5,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.544,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2102,
"best_odd": 1.825,
"edge": -0.0092,
"ev": -0.1044,
"implied_prob": 0.5,
"model_prob": 0.456,
"p_final": 0.4908
},
"p_final": 0.5092,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0706,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2102,
"best_odd": 1.825,
"edge": 0.0092,
"ev": -0.0706,
"implied_prob": 0.5,
"model_prob": 0.544,
"p_final": 0.5092
}
},
"edge": 0.0505,
"ev": 0.088,
"guard_blocked": true,
"implied_prob": 0.4935,
"model_prob": 0.544,
"side": "yes",
"value_side": "yes"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "lean",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2474,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.78,
"edge": 0.0001,
"market_prob": 0.5176,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2249,
"best_odd": 1.91,
"edge": -0.0001,
"ev": -0.0788,
"implied_prob": 0.4824,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.4823
},
"p_final": 0.5177,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0785,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2474,
"best_odd": 1.78,
"edge": 0.0001,
"ev": -0.0785,
"implied_prob": 0.5176,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.5177
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"edge": 0.0017,
"ev": -0.0417,
"implied_prob": 0.5163,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"side": "under",
"value_side": "under"
}
},
"match_id": 1608254,
"match_regime": {
"action": "bet",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": true,
"code": "clear_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.088,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 1.0,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3846,
"draw": 0.2959,
"home": 0.3195
},
"reason_codes": [
"model_summary"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Lumezzane",
"home": "Cittadella"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.047872,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.088,
"implied_prob": 0.4935,
"market": "btts",
"model_prob": 0.544,
"not_dominant": false,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "yes",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 2,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": 0.041,
"consensus_ev_display": "+4.1%",
"consensus_odds": 4.44,
"disagreement_label": "Strong",
"disagreement_level": "strong",
"implied_prob": 0.2086,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3846,
"raw_edge_display": "+17.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 17.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.2252252252252252,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.7076,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+70.8%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1608254,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-06T19:00:08.973803+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Khám phá thêm nội dung dự đoán
Nhận dự đoán cao cấp cho Cittadella & Lumezzane!
Mở khóa phân tích chuyên sâu, mẹo cá cược độc quyền và dự đoán trận đấu với dịch vụ đăng ký cao cấp của chúng tôi.
Đăng ký ngay
Serie C - Girone A — Bảng xếp hạng
| # | Đội | Tr | T | H | B | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cittadella | 7 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 21 |
| 2 | Union Brescia | 7 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 15 |
| 3 | Ospitaletto | 7 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 14 |
| 4 | Arzignano Valchiampo | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 13 |
| 5 | Trento | 7 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 13 |
| 6 | Treviso | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 12 |
| 7 | Alcione | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 10 |
| 8 | Dolomiti Bellunesi | 7 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 10 |
| 9 | Albinoleffe | 7 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 9 |
| 10 | Lumezzane | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 11 | Lecco | 7 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 8 |
| 12 | Desenzano Calvina | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 |
| 13 | Pergolettese | 7 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 |
| 14 | Athletic Carpi | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 15 | Folgore Caratese | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 16 | Juventus U23 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 17 | Novara | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 18 | Pro Vercelli | 7 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
| 19 | Giana Erminio | 7 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
| 20 | Renate | 7 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 2 |
| # | Đội | Tr | BT | BB | +/- | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cittadella | 7 | 13 | 2 | +11 | 21 |
| 2 | Ospitaletto | 7 | 13 | 5 | +8 | 14 |
| 3 | Union Brescia | 7 | 12 | 4 | +8 | 15 |
| 4 | Arzignano Valchiampo | 7 | 10 | 7 | +3 | 13 |
| 5 | Albinoleffe | 7 | 10 | 9 | +1 | 9 |
| 6 | Alcione | 7 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 10 |
| 7 | Athletic Carpi | 7 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 6 |
| 8 | Trento | 7 | 9 | 3 | +6 | 13 |
| 9 | Treviso | 7 | 8 | 6 | +2 | 12 |
| 10 | Folgore Caratese | 7 | 8 | 10 | -2 | 6 |
| 11 | Lumezzane | 7 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 8 |
| 12 | Juventus U23 | 7 | 7 | 13 | -6 | 6 |
| 13 | Dolomiti Bellunesi | 7 | 6 | 5 | +1 | 10 |
| 14 | Novara | 7 | 6 | 9 | -3 | 6 |
| 15 | Giana Erminio | 7 | 6 | 10 | -4 | 3 |
| 16 | Pro Vercelli | 7 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 6 |
| 17 | Renate | 7 | 5 | 11 | -6 | 2 |
| 18 | Lecco | 7 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 8 |
| 19 | Desenzano Calvina | 7 | 4 | 6 | -2 | 7 |
| 20 | Pergolettese | 7 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 7 |