The model missed the final outcome (Ishøj win 1–3).
The model had projected Holstebro at 35.6%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Thị trường được theo dõi so với kết quả toàn thời gian
Mỗi hàng so sánh mô hình trước trận đấu với kết quả toàn thời gian.
- Chợ Dự đoán Kết quả kết quả
- Tài / Xỉu 2.5 Xỉu 2.5 Tài 2.5 (4 mục tiêu) ✖ Không đúng
- Cả Hai Đội Đều Ghi Bàn BTTS Không Có ✖ Không đúng
- 1X2 Holstebro Ishøj ✖ Không đúng
- Thông tin tỷ số chính xác 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 1-3 ✖ Không đúng
Mô hình so với thị trường đóng cửa
| kết quả | Người mẫu | Thị trường đóng cửa | Sự khác biệt | Tín hiệu |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holstebro | 35.6% | 45.5% | -9.8 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 29.6% | 22.9% | +6.8 pp | Model Higher |
| Ishøj | 34.7% | 31.6% | +3.1 pp | Aligned |
The closing market estimates Holstebro's win probability at 45.5%, compared with the model's estimate of 35.6%, a difference of 9.8 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
Hết thời gian, kết quả là Ishøj win 1–3.
Market Assessment
The market and model broadly agree on Holstebro. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 4 goals materialised
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS No; match finished BTTS Yes
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (4 goals)
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Holstebro by 9.8 percentage points (45.4% vs model 35.6%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Dòng thời gian dự đoán
Dự đoán này chuyển từ dự báo sang đánh giá toàn thời gian như thế nào.
-
Sep 26, 2026 · 12:29 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Holstebro 35.6% · Draw 29.7% · Ishøj 34.7%
- xG · Holstebro 1.31 — Ishøj 1.29
-
Sep 26, 2026 · 12:00 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Holstebro 1.99 · Draw 3.95 · Ishøj 2.86
- Implied 1X2 · Holstebro 45.5% · Draw 22.9% · Ishøj 31.6%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 26, 2026 · 12:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Holstebro 1.99 · Draw 3.95 · Ishøj 2.86
- Implied 1X2 · Holstebro 45.5% · Draw 22.9% · Ishøj 31.6%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 26, 2026 · 12:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Ishøj win · 1–3
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Ảnh chụp lịch sử
Bị treo khi bắt đầu — kết quả đầu ra của mô hình như trước khi trận đấu bắt đầu.
Số liệu trước trận đấu (bối cảnh lịch sử)
- Validation: Pass
- No strong statistical edge
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Xem lại câu hỏi thường gặp
- Dự đoán đó chính xác đến mức nào?
- Trang này xếp loại các thị trường định hướng (1X2, Trên/Dưới 2,5, BTTS) so với kết quả toàn thời gian. Mức dự đoán phản ánh có bao nhiêu thị trường được theo dõi phù hợp với thực tế.
- Độ chính xác xG đo lường điều gì?
- Độ chính xác của xG so sánh hồ sơ bàn thắng dự kiến trước trận đấu của mô hình với tỷ số thực tế — chứ không phải liệu mọi thị trường có thành công hay không. Đánh giá mang tính định hướng mạnh mẽ có thể cùng tồn tại với điểm chính xác xG vừa phải.
- Tại sao tỷ số chính xác không được dự đoán?
- Các kết quả có tỷ số chính xác là các kết quả có xác suất thấp ngay cả khi mô hình đọc tốt hồ sơ trận đấu. Chúng tôi nêu bật các thùng điểm cao nhất cho ngữ cảnh; thiếu dòng chính xác không làm mất hiệu lực của đánh giá định hướng.
- Điều này có cải thiện bản ghi AI không?
- Mỗi trận đấu kết thúc sẽ được ghi vào hệ thống xác thực của chúng tôi. Tỷ lệ trúng tổng hợp và nghiên cứu CLV được xuất bản riêng - trang này là đường dẫn kiểm tra mỗi trận đấu.
Dự đoán chỉ nhằm mục đích thông tin. Luôn đánh bạc có trách nhiệm và trong giới hạn của bạn. Hiệu suất trong quá khứ không đảm bảo kết quả trong tương lai.
Chưa có briefing AI cho trận này. Sau khi nâng cấp máy chủ, chạy lại «Tạo tỷ lệ hàng loạt» để tạo bản tóm tắt.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "994d2da28bdccfc593005c606bae80261f48787c3dfc37829b57fb5c66719669",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.29,
"away_win_prob": 0.347,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.455,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.546,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2965,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.88,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.37,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.81,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.31,
"home_win_prob": 0.3564,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Double chance : Holstebro or draw",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "10%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "45%",
"winner_name": "Holstebro"
},
"away_xg": 1.29,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Holstebro",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": -0.0987,
"edge_gap": 0.0087,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.4546,
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 34.7,
"draw": 29.7,
"home": 35.6
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 1.99
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 1.99,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Holstebro Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Home",
"market_fair_odds": 2.2,
"market_odds": 1.99,
"model_odds": 2.81,
"overround": 10.5,
"prob_edge": -14.7,
"value_pct": -29.2,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 1,
"away_failed_to_score": 6,
"away_played": 8,
"away_score_rate": 72.5,
"home_clean_sheet": 1,
"home_failed_to_score": 2,
"home_played": 8,
"home_score_rate": 73.0,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"pick": "No",
"pick_prob": 54.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.29,
"home_expected": 1.31,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.6
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.7
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.6
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.2
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.1
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Holstebro or Draw",
"prob": 65.2
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Holstebro or Ish\u00f8j",
"prob": 70.3
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Ish\u00f8j",
"prob": 64.3
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Holstebro or Ish\u00f8j",
"pick_prob": 70.3
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 34.7,
"draw_pct": 29.6,
"home_pct": 35.6,
"lean_key": "home",
"lean_label": "Holstebro"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 0.5,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 1.9,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Under 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 16.9,
"implied_prob": 25.3,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Draw",
"market": "Draw",
"model_prob": 29.6,
"odds": 3.95
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Ish\u00f8j",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 31.63,
"draw": 22.9,
"home": 45.46
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-26 12:29:03",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-26 12:00:07",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Holstebro",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 45.46,
"gap_pp": -9.87,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 35.59
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 22.9,
"gap_pp": 6.77,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 29.68
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 31.63,
"gap_pp": 3.09,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 34.73
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 58.68,
"gap_pp": -10.48,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 48.2
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 41.32,
"gap_pp": 10.48,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 51.8
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 1.99,
"early": 1.99,
"implied_closing_pct": 45.46,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 45.46,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 3.95,
"early": 3.95,
"implied_closing_pct": 22.9,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 22.9,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 2.86,
"early": 2.86,
"implied_closing_pct": 31.63,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 31.63,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.57,
"early": 1.57,
"implied_closing_pct": 58.68,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 58.68,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 2.23,
"early": 2.23,
"implied_closing_pct": 41.32,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 41.32,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 10.5,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -0.7,
"ev": -0.055,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 7.5,
"market_prob": 0.1333,
"market_prob_pct": 13.3,
"model_prob": 0.126,
"model_prob_pct": 12.6,
"n_bookmakers": 4,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.6
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.6
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.7
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.6
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.2
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.1
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.31,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1931,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.15,
"edge": 0.0182,
"edge_pp": 1.8,
"market_prob": 0.4236,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2125,
"best_odd": 1.58,
"edge": -0.0201,
"ev": -0.121,
"implied_prob": 0.5764,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5564
},
"p_final": 0.4418,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 9.4,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1137,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0501,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1931,
"best_odd": 2.15,
"edge": 0.0182,
"ev": -0.0501,
"implied_prob": 0.4236,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4418
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.1951,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -19.5,
"text": "-19.5%"
},
"ev_under": 0.1551,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 15.5,
"text": "+15.5%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.1551,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 10289.59,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "under"
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1621,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.36,
"edge": 0.0108,
"edge_pp": 1.1,
"market_prob": 0.3886,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 3,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1621,
"best_odd": 2.36,
"edge": 0.0108,
"ev": -0.0575,
"implied_prob": 0.3886,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.3994
},
"p_final": 0.3994,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 6.6,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0738,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0575,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2228,
"best_odd": 1.5,
"edge": -0.0148,
"ev": -0.1051,
"implied_prob": 0.6114,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5966
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.092,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 9.2,
"text": "+9.2%"
},
"ev_yes": -0.1825,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -18.2,
"text": "-18.2%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.092,
"n_bookmakers": 3,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"sort_key": 10082.8,
"tier": "best",
"value_side": "no",
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has moved toward Ish\u00f8j, but the model still strongly favours Holstebro.",
"consensus_odds": 1.99,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": -0.1957,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -19.6,
"text": "-19.6%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.4546,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": -0.0232,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -2.3,
"text": "-2.3%"
},
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"raw_edge_display": "-9.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -9.9,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2918,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.2%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Holstebro",
"sort_key": 1794.2,
"tier": "bad_ev"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.8,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.6
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "5/7",
"alert_breadth_note": "5/7 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2193 -19.4%",
"alert_team": "Ish\u00f8j",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 9.9,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -9.82,
"hero_label": "Holstebro",
"market_prob_pct": 45.5,
"market_team": "Holstebro",
"model_prob_pct": 35.6,
"model_team": "Holstebro",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "\u2713",
"status_key": "aligned",
"status_label": "Reliable prediction",
"status_line": "Direction aligned; check pricing gap separately",
"steam_score": 88,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong multi-book steam",
"steam_tier": "A+",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 9.9,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 9.9,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Ish\u00f8j, but the model still strongly favours Holstebro."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 9.9,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 9.9,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Ish\u00f8j, but the model still strongly favours Holstebro."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1551,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.1723,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.5,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 33,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Holstebro at 35.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 45.5%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Holstebro as the value side (35.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 9.9,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Ish\u00f8j, but the model still strongly favours Holstebro.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Holstebro",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +15.5% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +15.5% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +15.5% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "74 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "33 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+15.5% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Ish\u00f8j, but the model still strongly favours Holstebro.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 74,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Ish\u00f8j, but the model still strongly favours Holstebro.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1957,
"consensus_ev_display": "-19.6%",
"consensus_odds": 1.99,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4546,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"raw_edge_display": "-9.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -9.9,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5025125628140703,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2918,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.2%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -3.0,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.02 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.02
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "5/7",
"breadth_ratio": 0.7142857142857143,
"evidence": {
"score": 68,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Sharp steam conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation passed",
"status": "pass"
}
],
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Pass",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Steam conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 20.1,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 7.1,
"steam_coherence": 0.0,
"validation": 30.0
},
"score": 74,
"stars": 3,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 9.82,
"market_agreement": "moderate",
"max_gap_pp": 9.82,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.29,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -3.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.31,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.31,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.31 \u00b7 Away xG 1.29 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -3%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": false,
"mv_status": "pass",
"odds_delta_pct": -19.4,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2193 -19.4%",
"steam_team": "Ish\u00f8j",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 33,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 17,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 17,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved toward Ish\u00f8j, but the model still strongly favours Holstebro.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 9.9,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 9.9,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Ish\u00f8j, but the model still strongly favours Holstebro."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 9.9,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 9.9,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Ish\u00f8j, but the model still strongly favours Holstebro."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1551,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.1723,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.5,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 33,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Holstebro at 35.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 45.5%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Holstebro as the value side (35.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 9.9,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Ish\u00f8j, but the model still strongly favours Holstebro.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Holstebro",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +15.5% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +15.5% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +15.5% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "74 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "33 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+15.5% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Ish\u00f8j, but the model still strongly favours Holstebro.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 74,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Ish\u00f8j, but the model still strongly favours Holstebro.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1957,
"consensus_ev_display": "-19.6%",
"consensus_odds": 1.99,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4546,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"raw_edge_display": "-9.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -9.9,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5025125628140703,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2918,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.2%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -3.0,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.02 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.02
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has moved toward Ish\u00f8j, but the model still strongly favours Holstebro.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Holstebro 1.31 xG vs Ish\u00f8j 1.29 \u2192 Holstebro 35.6%",
"Market: Holstebro ~45.5% implied",
"Market Steam: Ish\u00f8j \u2193 -19.4%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Holstebro, but sharp money moved toward Ish\u00f8j.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -9.82,
"fair_prob": 35.64,
"label": "Holstebro",
"market_prob": 45.46,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 6.75,
"fair_prob": 29.65,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 22.9,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 3.07,
"fair_prob": 34.7,
"label": "Ish\u00f8j",
"market_prob": 31.63,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": -9.34,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 57.54,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": 9.34,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 42.46,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": -6.61,
"fair_prob": 54.5,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 61.11,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": 6.61,
"fair_prob": 45.5,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 38.89,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "mild_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -9.82,
"fair_prob_pct": 35.64,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "Holstebro",
"market_prob_pct": 45.46,
"status": "market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "Ish\u00f8j"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates Holstebro\u0027s win probability at 45.5%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 35.6%, a difference of 9.8 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "moderate",
"edge_status": "market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 9.82,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Moderate model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "moderate",
"divergence_level_label": "Moderate divergence",
"divergence_note": "Fair estimate and market pricing differ modestly. Monitor before kickoff.",
"divergence_tier": "moderate",
"edge_label": "Mild disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "mild_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Holstebro",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 45.5,
"model_prob_gap_display": "-9.9 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": -9.9,
"model_prob_pct": 35.6,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "-9.9 percentage points",
"gap_pp": -9.9,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Moderate reliability",
"reliability_icon": "\u2713",
"reliability_score": 74,
"reliability_tier": "moderate",
"summary": "The market has moved toward Ish\u00f8j, but the model still strongly favours Holstebro. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Pass",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 33,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 17,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 35,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 17,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Holstebro 1.31 xG vs Ish\u00f8j 1.29 \u2192 Holstebro 35.6%",
"Market: Holstebro ~45.5% implied",
"Market Steam: Ish\u00f8j \u2193 -19.4%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Holstebro, but sharp money moved toward Ish\u00f8j.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -9.82,
"hero_label": "Holstebro",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "Ish\u00f8j odds shortened \u2193 -19.4%.",
"market_agreement": "moderate",
"market_agreement_label": "Moderate",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Monitor line movement before kickoff \u2014 not a betting recommendation."
],
"follow_up": "However, recent buying interest has been on Ish\u00f8j, with odds shortening by 19.4%.",
"gap_tier": "mild",
"lead": "The market and model broadly agree on Holstebro. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.",
"note": "Buying interest on Ish\u00f8j \u2014 odds shortened by 19.4%.",
"paragraphs": [
"The market and model broadly agree on Holstebro. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.",
"However, recent buying interest has been on Ish\u00f8j, with odds shortening by 19.4%.",
"Buying interest on Ish\u00f8j \u2014 odds shortened by 19.4%."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The market still prices Holstebro above the current fair estimate.",
"At the same time, Ish\u00f8j has attracted buying interest, with odds shortening by 19.4%.",
"Broad sportsbook alignment (5/7) supports the current market view on Ish\u00f8j."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 9.82,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_pass",
"status": "pass"
},
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Top two 1X2 outcomes within 0.9 percentage points."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 0.9,
"max_prob_pct": 35.6,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "moderate",
"largest_gap_label": "Holstebro",
"largest_gap_pp": -9.8,
"lead": "The closing market prices Holstebro higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "moderate",
"max_gap_pp": 9.8,
"title": "Moderate Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -9.82,
"edge_pp": -9.82,
"fair_prob_pct": 35.64,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Holstebro",
"market_prob_pct": 45.46,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 6.75,
"edge_pp": 6.75,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.65,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 22.9,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "model_higher",
"signal_label": "Model Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 3.07,
"edge_pp": 3.07,
"fair_prob_pct": 34.7,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Ish\u00f8j",
"market_prob_pct": 31.63,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
}
],
"status": "market_ahead",
"status_label": "Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "Buying interest on Ish\u00f8j \u2014 odds shortened by 19.4%.",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Holstebro (45.5%).",
"However, Ish\u00f8j has attracted one of the strongest multi-book steam moves of the day (\u2193 -19.4%, 5/7).",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Holstebro, Market \u2192 Holstebro, Recent sharp money \u2192 Ish\u00f8j.",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 50.25,
"closing_odds": 1.99,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 50.25,
"entry_odds": 1.99,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Pass",
"model_validation_status": "pass",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 5,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -23.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": -23.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -22.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": -22.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -22.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": -22.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -19.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": -19.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2193 -18.9%",
"odds_delta_pct": -18.9
}
],
"books_total": 7,
"breadth_display": "5/7",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 2.9,
"is_drift": false,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2193 -19.4%",
"move_pct_abs": 19.4,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 77h 39m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"5/7 books synchronized on Ish\u00f8j (19.4% steam, score 88) \u2014 high-conviction multi-book repricing beats isolated ticks.",
"Sharp sportsbooks led a meaningful repricing with broad market follow-through."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": -19.4,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"3.60",
"3.23",
"2.86"
],
"display": "3.90 \u2192 2.83 \u2192 2.90",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 77h 39m",
"pick_team": "Ish\u00f8j",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.90"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "2.83"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.90"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
3.6,
2.86,
2.9
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,0.0 28.0,18.0 56.0,17.0",
"sparkline_trend": "down",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way drop",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "3.60"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "2.86"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "3.60"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.90"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 3.6,
"page_alert_line": "Sharp money alert: Ish\u00f8j \u2193 -19.4% market move detected",
"phase_label": "Sharp repricing",
"phase_tip": "Aggressive adjustment \u2014 often sharp-led or high consensus.",
"pick_team": "Ish\u00f8j",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "Sharp money alert: Ish\u00f8j \u2193 -19.4% market move detected",
"sharp_leader": "Betfair",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "steam",
"signal_icon": "\ud83d\udd25",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 2.9,
"is_drift": false,
"label": "Sharp signal",
"move_display": "\u2193 -19.4%",
"open_odds": 3.6,
"summary": "Market moved toward Ish\u00f8j while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "Ish\u00f8j",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "strong_steam",
"signal_label": "Strong steam",
"steam_score": 88,
"steam_subtitle": "Strong multi-book steam",
"steam_tier": "A+",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "5/7",
"current_odds": 2.9,
"move_display": "\u2193 -19.4%",
"open_odds": 3.6,
"pick_team": "Ish\u00f8j",
"steam_score": 88,
"steam_team_name": "Ish\u00f8j",
"steam_tier": "A+"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 9.8,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "ishj",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Ish\u00f8j",
"away_team_id": 8645,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/8645.webp",
"away_team_name": "Ish\u00f8j",
"away_team_public_id": "1eJ0b0UAFd4TG2",
"away_team_slug": "ishj",
"country_code": "DK",
"country_display_name": "Denmark",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/dk.svg",
"country_id": 44,
"country_name": "Denmark",
"fixture_id": 1577790,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Denmark",
"home_team_display_name": "Holstebro",
"home_team_id": 6028,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/6028.webp",
"home_team_name": "Holstebro",
"home_team_public_id": "33YvtO146AFrZG",
"home_team_slug": "holstebro",
"ht.home_team_slug": "holstebro",
"league_country": "Denmark",
"league_country_display": "Denmark",
"league_display_name": "Gi\u1ea3i H\u1ea1ng Ba \u0110an M\u1ea1ch",
"league_id": 862,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/862.webp",
"league_name": "Gi\u1ea3i H\u1ea1ng Ba \u0110an M\u1ea1ch",
"league_public_id": "0zfnC3zAqnh1zb",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-26 12:30:00",
"public_id": "5jjleZOeC1fgUI",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": null,
"venue_name": null
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.4291,
"best_odd": 2.86,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0133,
"ev": -0.0573,
"implied_prob": 0.3163,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3163,
"draw": 0.229,
"home": 0.4546
},
"model_prob": 0.3473,
"p_final": 0.3296
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.2695,
"best_odd": 3.95,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0183,
"ev": -0.0232,
"implied_prob": 0.229,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3163,
"draw": 0.229,
"home": 0.4546
},
"model_prob": 0.2968,
"p_final": 0.2473
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.5112,
"best_odd": 1.99,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0505,
"ev": -0.1957,
"implied_prob": 0.4546,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3163,
"draw": 0.229,
"home": 0.4546
},
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"p_final": 0.4042
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 2.86,
"edge": -0.0024,
"ev": -0.0068,
"implied_prob": 0.3497,
"model_prob": 0.3473
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.95,
"edge": 0.0436,
"ev": 0.1723,
"implied_prob": 0.2532,
"model_prob": 0.2968
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 1.99,
"edge": -0.1466,
"ev": -0.2917,
"implied_prob": 0.5025,
"model_prob": 0.3559
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.1621,
"alpha_yes": 0.2228,
"best_no_odd": 2.4,
"best_yes_odd": 1.5,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": 0.0661,
"edge_yes": -0.0661,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.092,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.0575,
"ev_yes": -0.1825,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.1051,
"implied_no": 0.3889,
"implied_yes": 0.6111,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 3,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1621,
"best_odd": 2.36,
"edge": 0.0108,
"ev": -0.0575,
"implied_prob": 0.3886,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.3994
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2228,
"best_odd": 1.5,
"edge": -0.0148,
"ev": -0.1051,
"implied_prob": 0.6114,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5966
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 3,
"p_final_no": 0.3994,
"p_final_yes": 0.5966,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.2125,
"alpha_under": 0.1931,
"best_over_odd": 1.67,
"best_under_odd": 2.23,
"consensus_over_odd": 1.58,
"consensus_under_odd": 2.15,
"edge_over": -0.0934,
"edge_under": 0.0934,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.1951,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.121,
"ev_under": 0.1551,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.0501,
"implied_over": 0.5754,
"implied_over_mf": 0.5764,
"implied_under": 0.4246,
"implied_under_mf": 0.4236,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2125,
"best_odd": 1.58,
"edge": -0.0201,
"ev": -0.121,
"implied_prob": 0.5764,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5564
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1931,
"best_odd": 2.15,
"edge": 0.0182,
"ev": -0.0501,
"implied_prob": 0.4236,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4418
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.5564,
"p_final_under": 0.4418,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1551,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.1723,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.1551,
"confidence": 6.5,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_v1_legacy": 6.5,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 4.5,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.0,
"score_pre_penalty": 4.5
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 9.9,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 9.9,
"summary": "The market has moved toward Ish\u00f8j, but the model still strongly favours Holstebro."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1551,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.1723,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.0,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 4.5,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 33,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Holstebro at 35.6%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 45.5%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Holstebro as the value side (35.6%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 9.9,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved toward Ish\u00f8j, but the model still strongly favours Holstebro.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Holstebro",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +15.5% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +15.5% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.0/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +15.5% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.0/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "74 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "33 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+15.5% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved toward Ish\u00f8j, but the model still strongly favours Holstebro.",
"Decision strength: 3.0/10",
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 74,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "The market has moved toward Ish\u00f8j, but the model still strongly favours Holstebro.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1957,
"consensus_ev_display": "-19.6%",
"consensus_odds": 1.99,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4546,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"raw_edge_display": "-9.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -9.9,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5025125628140703,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2918,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.2%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -3.0,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.02 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.02
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"draw_prob": 0.2968,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.3559,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.02
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 1.99,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": -0.0505,
"ev": -0.1957,
"implied_prob": 0.4546,
"max_ev_side": "draw",
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"side": "home",
"side_label": "Holstebro"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1621,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.36,
"edge": 0.0108,
"market_prob": 0.3886,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.455,
"n_bookmakers": 3,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.1621,
"best_odd": 2.36,
"edge": 0.0108,
"ev": -0.0575,
"implied_prob": 0.3886,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.3994
},
"p_final": 0.3994,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0575,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.2228,
"best_odd": 1.5,
"edge": -0.0148,
"ev": -0.1051,
"implied_prob": 0.6114,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.5966
}
},
"edge": 0.0661,
"ev": 0.092,
"implied_prob": 0.3889,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"side": "no",
"value_side": "no"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1931,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.15,
"edge": 0.0182,
"market_prob": 0.4236,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2125,
"best_odd": 1.58,
"edge": -0.0201,
"ev": -0.121,
"implied_prob": 0.5764,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.5564
},
"p_final": 0.4418,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0501,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.1931,
"best_odd": 2.15,
"edge": 0.0182,
"ev": -0.0501,
"implied_prob": 0.4236,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.4418
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"edge": 0.0934,
"ev": 0.1551,
"implied_prob": 0.4246,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"side": "under",
"value_side": "under"
}
},
"match_id": 1577790,
"match_regime": {
"action": "bet",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": true,
"code": "clear_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.1551,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 1.0,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3473,
"draw": 0.2968,
"home": 0.3559
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Ish\u00f8j",
"home": "Holstebro"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.056239,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1551,
"implied_prob": 0.4246,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.518,
"not_dominant": false,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "under",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 2,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1957,
"consensus_ev_display": "-19.6%",
"consensus_odds": 1.99,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4546,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3559,
"raw_edge_display": "-9.9 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -9.9,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.5025125628140703,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2918,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-29.2%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1577790,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-26T12:29:11.216058+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Khám phá thêm nội dung dự đoán
Nhận dự đoán cao cấp cho Holstebro & Ishøj!
Mở khóa phân tích chuyên sâu, mẹo cá cược độc quyền và dự đoán trận đấu với dịch vụ đăng ký cao cấp của chúng tôi.
Đăng ký ngay
Giải Hạng Ba Đan Mạch — Bảng xếp hạng
| # | Đội | Tr | T | H | B | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Holbæk B&I | 9 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 19 |
| 2 | Brønshøj BK | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 17 |
| 3 | FC Helsingør | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 17 |
| 4 | Vanløse | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 15 |
| 5 | Holstebro | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 13 |
| 6 | ASA Aarhus | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 13 |
| 7 | Næsby BK | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| 8 | Hørsholm-Usserød | 8 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 9 |
| 9 | Frem | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| 10 | Sundby | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| 11 | Ishøj | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 |
| 12 | Ringsted | 8 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 4 |
| # | Đội | Tr | BT | BB | +/- | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Holbæk B&I | 9 | 24 | 17 | +7 | 19 |
| 2 | FC Helsingør | 9 | 17 | 11 | +6 | 17 |
| 3 | Brønshøj BK | 8 | 16 | 8 | +8 | 17 |
| 4 | Frem | 8 | 16 | 15 | +1 | 8 |
| 5 | Hørsholm-Usserød | 8 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 9 |
| 6 | Holstebro | 8 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 13 |
| 7 | Vanløse | 8 | 14 | 8 | +6 | 15 |
| 8 | Næsby BK | 8 | 14 | 13 | +1 | 11 |
| 9 | ASA Aarhus | 8 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 13 |
| 10 | Sundby | 8 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 7 |
| 11 | Ringsted | 8 | 10 | 23 | -13 | 4 |
| 12 | Ishøj | 8 | 4 | 16 | -12 | 4 |