The model missed the final outcome (1. FC Nürnberg win 2–1).
The model had projected Hannover 96 at 48.3%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Thị trường được theo dõi so với kết quả toàn thời gian
Cấp dự đoán
F
Mỗi hàng so sánh mô hình trước trận đấu với kết quả toàn thời gian.
- Chợ Dự đoán Kết quả kết quả
- Tài / Xỉu 2.5 Xỉu 2.5 Tài 2.5 (3 mục tiêu) ✖ Không đúng
- Cả Hai Đội Đều Ghi Bàn BTTS Không Có ✖ Không đúng
- 1X2 Hannover 96 1. FC Nürnberg ✖ Không đúng
- Thông tin tỷ số chính xác 1-1, 1-2, 0-1, 0-2, 2-1 2-1 ✔ Chính xác
Mô hình so với thị trường đóng cửa
| kết quả | Người mẫu | Thị trường đóng cửa | Sự khác biệt | Tín hiệu |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. FC Nürnberg | 25.9% | 41.5% | -15.6 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 25.9% | 23.8% | +2.0 pp | Aligned |
| Hannover 96 | 48.3% | 34.7% | +13.6 pp | Model Edge |
The closing market estimates 1. FC Nürnberg's win probability at 41.5%, compared with the model's estimate of 25.9%, a difference of 15.6 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
Hết thời gian, kết quả là 1. FC Nürnberg win 2–1.
Market Assessment
The market is materially more optimistic about 1. FC Nürnberg than the current fair estimate.
- Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
- Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 3.08) — 3 goals materialised
- Exact score 2–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS No; match finished BTTS Yes
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (3 goals)
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Hannover 96 by 15.6 percentage points (63.9% vs model 48.3%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Nhà cái cao cấp stake: người mới có thể dùng mã khuyến mãi FHn2uDc1. Đăng ký ngay
Dòng thời gian dự đoán
Dự đoán này chuyển từ dự báo sang đánh giá toàn thời gian như thế nào.
-
Sep 11, 2026 · 16:29 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · 1. FC Nürnberg 25.9% · Draw 25.8% · Hannover 96 48.3%
- xG · 1. FC Nürnberg 1.28 — Hannover 96 1.80
-
Sep 11, 2026 · 16:01 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · 1. FC Nürnberg 2.33 · Draw 4.06 · Hannover 96 2.79
- Implied 1X2 · 1. FC Nürnberg 41.5% · Draw 23.8% · Hannover 96 34.7%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 11, 2026 · 16:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · 1. FC Nürnberg 2.33 · Draw 4.06 · Hannover 96 2.79
- Implied 1X2 · 1. FC Nürnberg 41.5% · Draw 23.8% · Hannover 96 34.7%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 11, 2026 · 16:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result 1. FC Nürnberg win · 2–1
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Ảnh chụp lịch sử
Bị treo khi bắt đầu — kết quả đầu ra của mô hình như trước khi trận đấu bắt đầu.
Phán quyết lịch sử:
Monitor
Quyết định lịch sử
Monitor
kết quả
Missed
Số liệu trước trận đấu (bối cảnh lịch sử)
Độ tin cậy dự đoán
55/100
· Moderate
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (16 pp)
Chứng cớ
★★★★★
- No strong statistical edge
- Pricing remains divergent
- Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap)
7/100
Monitoring Confidence
19/100
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
2.33
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
Pending
Final Result
1. FC Nürnberg win · 1. FC Nürnberg 2–1 Hannover 96
Prediction
✖ Missed
Decision Grade
F
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Xem lại câu hỏi thường gặp
- Dự đoán đó chính xác đến mức nào?
- Trang này xếp loại các thị trường định hướng (1X2, Trên/Dưới 2,5, BTTS) so với kết quả toàn thời gian. Mức dự đoán phản ánh có bao nhiêu thị trường được theo dõi phù hợp với thực tế.
- Độ chính xác xG đo lường điều gì?
- Độ chính xác của xG so sánh hồ sơ bàn thắng dự kiến trước trận đấu của mô hình với tỷ số thực tế — chứ không phải liệu mọi thị trường có thành công hay không. Đánh giá mang tính định hướng mạnh mẽ có thể cùng tồn tại với điểm chính xác xG vừa phải.
- Tại sao tỷ số chính xác không được dự đoán?
- Các kết quả có tỷ số chính xác là các kết quả có xác suất thấp ngay cả khi mô hình đọc tốt hồ sơ trận đấu. Chúng tôi nêu bật các thùng điểm cao nhất cho ngữ cảnh; thiếu dòng chính xác không làm mất hiệu lực của đánh giá định hướng.
- Điều này có cải thiện bản ghi AI không?
- Mỗi trận đấu kết thúc sẽ được ghi vào hệ thống xác thực của chúng tôi. Tỷ lệ trúng tổng hợp và nghiên cứu CLV được xuất bản riêng - trang này là đường dẫn kiểm tra mỗi trận đấu.
Dự đoán chỉ nhằm mục đích thông tin. Luôn đánh bạc có trách nhiệm và trong giới hạn của bạn. Hiệu suất trong quá khứ không đảm bảo kết quả trong tương lai.
Chưa có briefing AI cho trận này. Sau khi nâng cấp máy chủ, chạy lại «Tạo tỷ lệ hàng loạt» để tạo bản tóm tắt.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "768bb3985d94646b578a04d4c03975380aeca987f33234d081595f578b4eeec1",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.8,
"away_win_prob": 0.4826,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.384,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.616,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2585,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.07,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.87,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 3.86,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.28,
"home_win_prob": 0.2589,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.595,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"under_25_prob": 0.406
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Winner : 1. FC N\u00fcrnberg",
"main_pick_display": "Winner : Hannover 96",
"percent_away": "10%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "45%",
"winner_name": "1. FC N\u00fcrnberg"
},
"away_xg": 1.8,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Hannover 96",
"confidence": 48.3,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "Winner : Hannover 96",
"edge": 0.1362,
"edge_gap": 0.2239,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.3467,
"model_prob": 0.4828,
"pick_type": "winner",
"probabilities": {
"away": 48.3,
"draw": 25.8,
"home": 25.9
},
"reason": "",
"selection": "away",
"selection_name": "Hannover 96"
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 2.79
}
],
"risk_color": "#f44336",
"risk_key": "high_risk",
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 2.79,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Hannover 96 Win",
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market_fair_odds": 2.88,
"market_odds": 2.79,
"model_odds": 2.07,
"overround": 3.4,
"prob_edge": 12.5,
"value_pct": 34.8,
"value_rating": "strong_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 1,
"away_failed_to_score": 1,
"away_played": 4,
"away_score_rate": 83.5,
"home_clean_sheet": 1,
"home_failed_to_score": 0,
"home_played": 3,
"home_score_rate": 72.2,
"no_prob": 38.4,
"pick": "No",
"pick_prob": 61.6,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 61.6
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.8,
"home_expected": 1.28,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 10.6
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 9.5
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 8.3
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-2",
"prob": 7.4
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 6.8
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "1. FC N\u00fcrnberg or Draw",
"prob": 51.8
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "1. FC N\u00fcrnberg or Hannover 96",
"prob": 74.2
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Hannover 96",
"prob": 74.2
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "1. FC N\u00fcrnberg or Hannover 96",
"pick_prob": 74.2
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 48.3,
"draw_pct": 25.9,
"home_pct": 25.9,
"lean_key": "away",
"lean_label": "Hannover 96"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": null,
"avg_total": 3.08,
"away_avg_scored": 1.0,
"confidence": "medium",
"home_avg_scored": 3.7,
"over_prob": 59.5,
"pick": "Under 2.5",
"pick_prob": 59.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 3.08,
"under_prob": 40.6
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 34.8,
"implied_prob": 35.8,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Hannover 96 Win",
"model_prob": 48.3,
"odds": 2.79
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Hannover 96",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 34.67,
"draw": 23.82,
"home": 41.51
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-11 16:29:29",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-11 16:01:52",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "1. FC N\u00fcrnberg",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 41.51,
"gap_pp": -15.62,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 25.89
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 23.82,
"gap_pp": 2.0,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 25.83
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 34.67,
"gap_pp": 13.62,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 48.28
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 70.56,
"gap_pp": -11.06,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 59.5
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 29.44,
"gap_pp": 11.16,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 40.6
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 2.33,
"early": 2.33,
"implied_closing_pct": 41.51,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 41.51,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 4.06,
"early": 4.06,
"implied_closing_pct": 23.82,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 23.82,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 2.79,
"early": 2.79,
"implied_closing_pct": 34.67,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 34.67,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 1.36,
"early": 1.36,
"implied_closing_pct": 70.56,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 70.56,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 3.26,
"early": 3.26,
"implied_closing_pct": 29.44,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 29.44,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 13.6,
"kind": "1x2_a"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -0.5,
"ev": -0.046,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 9.0,
"market_prob": 0.1111,
"market_prob_pct": 11.1,
"model_prob": 0.106,
"model_prob_pct": 10.6,
"n_bookmakers": 10,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 10.6
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 10.6
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 9.5
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 8.3
},
{
"label": "0-2",
"prob": 7.4
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 6.8
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.28,
"homepage_pick": {
"best_bookmaker": "Superbet",
"best_odds": 2.6,
"confidence": "lean",
"display_label": "Away Hannover 96",
"edge": 9.8,
"ev": 25.6,
"probability": 48.3
},
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.3983,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.7,
"edge": 0.0257,
"edge_pp": 2.6,
"market_prob": 0.3415,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.406,
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.5486,
"best_odd": 1.4,
"edge": -0.0349,
"ev": -0.1268,
"implied_prob": 0.6585,
"model_prob": 0.595,
"p_final": 0.6237
},
"p_final": 0.3672,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"raw_edge_pp": 6.5,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0962,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0086,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.3983,
"best_odd": 2.7,
"edge": 0.0257,
"ev": -0.0086,
"implied_prob": 0.3415,
"model_prob": 0.406,
"p_final": 0.3672
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.1016,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -10.2,
"text": "-10.2%"
},
"ev_under": 0.3236,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": true,
"raw_pct": 32.4,
"text": "+25%+"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.3236,
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"over_prob": 59.5,
"sort_key": 10441.24,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 40.6,
"value_side": "under"
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.4001,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.85,
"edge": 0.0247,
"edge_pp": 2.5,
"market_prob": 0.3222,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.384,
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.4001,
"best_odd": 2.85,
"edge": 0.0247,
"ev": -0.0112,
"implied_prob": 0.3222,
"model_prob": 0.384,
"p_final": 0.347
},
"p_final": 0.347,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"raw_edge_pp": 6.2,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0944,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0112,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.5502,
"best_odd": 1.355,
"edge": -0.034,
"ev": -0.1277,
"implied_prob": 0.6778,
"model_prob": 0.616,
"p_final": 0.6438
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.2749,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": true,
"raw_pct": 27.5,
"text": "+25%+"
},
"ev_yes": -0.1191,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -11.9,
"text": "-11.9%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.2749,
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"no_prob": 38.4,
"sort_key": 10247.41,
"tier": "best",
"value_side": "no",
"yes_prob": 61.6
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "The market has moved away from Hannover 96, but the model still strongly favours Hannover 96.",
"consensus_odds": 2.79,
"decision": "value_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": 0.1032,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 10.3,
"text": "+10.3%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.3467,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": 0.1032,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 10.3,
"text": "+10.3%"
},
"model_prob": 0.4828,
"raw_edge_display": "+13.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 13.6,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.347,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+34.7%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Hannover 96",
"sort_key": 10092.88,
"tier": "best"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 811.8,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 10.6
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "12/14",
"alert_breadth_note": "12/14 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2191 +13.4%",
"alert_team": "Hannover 96",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 15.6,
"has_alert": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -15.62,
"hero_label": "1. FC N\u00fcrnberg",
"market_prob_pct": 34.7,
"market_team": "1. FC N\u00fcrnberg",
"model_prob_pct": 48.3,
"model_team": "Hannover 96",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "!",
"status_key": "caution",
"status_label": "Use caution",
"status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
"steam_score": 48,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "market_disagree",
"read_min": 5,
"title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
"url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 15.6,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 15.6,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Hannover 96, but the model still strongly favours Hannover 96."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 15.6,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 15.6,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Hannover 96, but the model still strongly favours Hannover 96."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.3236,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3471,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 4.4,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.9,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 20,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Hannover 96 at 48.3%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 34.7%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Hannover 96 as the value side (48.3%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 13.6,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Hannover 96, but the model still strongly favours Hannover 96.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Hannover 96",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +32.4% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +32.4% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 4.4/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +32.4% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 4.4/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "57 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "20 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+32.4% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Hannover 96, but the model still strongly favours Hannover 96.",
"Decision strength: 4.4/10",
"Reliability below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 57,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Hannover 96, but the model still strongly favours Hannover 96.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.1032,
"consensus_ev_display": "+10.3%",
"consensus_odds": 2.79,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.3467,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4828,
"raw_edge_display": "+13.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 13.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.35842293906810035,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.347,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+34.7%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 33.3,
"reasons": [
"Clear xG separation gap=0.52"
],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "clear",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 5,
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"xg_gap": 0.52
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "12/14",
"breadth_ratio": 0.8571428571428571,
"evidence": {
"score": 57,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Recent market move conflicts with the model favourite",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation warning",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Warning",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "gap",
"label": "Large market gap (16 pp)",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift conflicts with model",
"tone": "caution"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 17.2,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 8.6,
"steam_coherence": 0.0,
"validation": 14.0
},
"score": 57,
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 15.62,
"market_agreement": "weak",
"max_gap_pp": 15.62,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.8,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 33.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.28,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.8,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.28 \u00b7 Away xG 1.80 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation +33%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": true,
"mv_status": "warning",
"odds_delta_pct": 13.4,
"steam_conflicts": true,
"steam_move_display": "\u2191 +13.4%",
"steam_team": "Hannover 96",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 20,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 11,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 48,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 11,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "The market has moved away from Hannover 96, but the model still strongly favours Hannover 96.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 15.6,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 15.6,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Hannover 96, but the model still strongly favours Hannover 96."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 15.6,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 15.6,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Hannover 96, but the model still strongly favours Hannover 96."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.3236,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3471,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 4.4,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.9,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 20,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Hannover 96 at 48.3%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 34.7%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Hannover 96 as the value side (48.3%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 13.6,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Hannover 96, but the model still strongly favours Hannover 96.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Hannover 96",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +32.4% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +32.4% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 4.4/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +32.4% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 4.4/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "57 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "20 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+32.4% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Hannover 96, but the model still strongly favours Hannover 96.",
"Decision strength: 4.4/10",
"Reliability below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 57,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Hannover 96, but the model still strongly favours Hannover 96.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.1032,
"consensus_ev_display": "+10.3%",
"consensus_odds": 2.79,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.3467,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4828,
"raw_edge_display": "+13.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 13.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.35842293906810035,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.347,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+34.7%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 33.3,
"reasons": [
"Clear xG separation gap=0.52"
],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "clear",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 5,
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"xg_gap": 0.52
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "The market has moved away from Hannover 96, but the model still strongly favours Hannover 96.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: 1. FC N\u00fcrnberg 1.28 xG vs Hannover 96 1.80 \u2192 Hannover 96 48.3%",
"Market: 1. FC N\u00fcrnberg ~34.7% implied",
"Market Drift: Hannover 96 odds \u2191 +13.4%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Hannover 96, but the market has moved away from Hannover 96.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -15.62,
"fair_prob": 25.89,
"label": "1. FC N\u00fcrnberg",
"market_prob": 41.51,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": 2.03,
"fair_prob": 25.85,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 23.82,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 13.59,
"fair_prob": 48.26,
"label": "Hannover 96",
"market_prob": 34.67,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": -7.61,
"fair_prob": 59.5,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 67.11,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": 7.71,
"fair_prob": 40.6,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 32.89,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": -7.01,
"fair_prob": 61.6,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 68.61,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": 7.01,
"fair_prob": 38.4,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 31.39,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
"edge_pp": -15.62,
"fair_prob_pct": 25.89,
"hero_side": "home",
"hero_team_name": "1. FC N\u00fcrnberg",
"market_prob_pct": 41.51,
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"steam_team_name": "Hannover 96"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The closing market estimates 1. FC N\u00fcrnberg\u0027s win probability at 41.5%, compared with the model\u0027s estimate of 25.9%, a difference of 15.6 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "strong",
"edge_status": "strong_market_ahead",
"max_gap_pp": 15.62,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "strong",
"divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
"divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
"divergence_tier": "strong",
"edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Slight favourite",
"favourite_label": "Hannover 96",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "medium",
"headline": "Slight edge match",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Conflicts with model",
"positive": false
},
"market_prob_pct": 34.7,
"model_prob_gap_display": "+13.6 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": 13.6,
"model_prob_pct": 48.3,
"outcome_separation_tier": "medium",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "+13.6 percentage points",
"gap_pp": 13.6,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
"reliability_icon": "!",
"reliability_score": 57,
"reliability_tier": "limited",
"summary": "The market has moved away from Hannover 96, but the model still strongly favours Hannover 96. This disagreement reduces confidence and prevents a Primary bet.",
"tier": "slight_edge",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Warning",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Monitoring Confidence",
"score": 20,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 11,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 48,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 11,
"tier": "not_reliable",
"tier_label": "Not reliable"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: 1. FC N\u00fcrnberg 1.28 xG vs Hannover 96 1.80 \u2192 Hannover 96 48.3%",
"Market: 1. FC N\u00fcrnberg ~34.7% implied",
"Market Drift: Hannover 96 odds \u2191 +13.4%"
],
"one_liner": "Model favours Hannover 96, but the market has moved away from Hannover 96.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "A lead outcome exists, but the match is not one-sided in the model.",
"tier": "medium",
"tier_label": "Medium"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Medium",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": -15.62,
"hero_label": "1. FC N\u00fcrnberg",
"hero_side": "home",
"market_activity": "Hannover 96 odds lengthened \u2191 +13.4%.",
"market_agreement": "weak",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.",
"Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing."
],
"follow_up": "However, Hannover 96 has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 13.4%, suggesting weakening support.",
"gap_tier": "strong",
"lead": "The market is materially more optimistic about 1. FC N\u00fcrnberg than the current fair estimate.",
"note": "Drift away from Hannover 96 \u2014 odds lengthened by 13.4% (weakening support).",
"paragraphs": [
"The market is materially more optimistic about 1. FC N\u00fcrnberg than the current fair estimate.",
"However, Hannover 96 has seen drift \u2014 odds lengthened by 13.4%, suggesting weakening support.",
"Drift away from Hannover 96 \u2014 odds lengthened by 13.4% (weakening support)."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The market favors 1. FC N\u00fcrnberg more strongly than the current fair estimate.",
"At the same time, Hannover 96 has drifted \u2014 odds lengthened by 13.4%, suggesting weakening support.",
"Broad sportsbook alignment (12/14) supports the current market view on Hannover 96."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 15.62,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
"status": "warning"
},
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Favourite exceeds second outcome by 22.4 pp (at 48.3%)."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 22.4,
"max_prob_pct": 48.3,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "medium",
"tier_label": "Medium"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Medium",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "strong",
"largest_gap_label": "1. FC N\u00fcrnberg",
"largest_gap_pp": -15.6,
"lead": "The closing market prices 1. FC N\u00fcrnberg higher than the statistical model.",
"level": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 15.6,
"title": "Strong Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -15.62,
"edge_pp": -15.62,
"fair_prob_pct": 25.89,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "1. FC N\u00fcrnberg",
"market_prob_pct": 41.51,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": 2.03,
"edge_pp": 2.03,
"fair_prob_pct": 25.85,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 23.82,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 13.59,
"edge_pp": 13.59,
"fair_prob_pct": 48.26,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Hannover 96",
"market_prob_pct": 34.67,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "model_edge",
"signal_label": "Model Edge"
}
],
"status": "strong_market_ahead",
"status_label": "Strong Market Ahead",
"steam_note": "Drift away from Hannover 96 \u2014 odds lengthened by 13.4% (weakening support).",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": true,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers 1. FC N\u00fcrnberg (34.7%).",
"Hannover 96 odds have drifted longer across books (\u2191 +13.4%, 12/14) \u2014 market pricing moves against this side.",
"This creates a conflict: Model \u2192 Hannover 96, Market \u2192 1. FC N\u00fcrnberg, while Hannover 96 odds drifted longer (market fade).",
"Because signals disagree, confidence remains limited."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 42.92,
"closing_odds": 2.33,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 42.92,
"entry_odds": 2.33,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"model_validation_status": "warning",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 12,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 7,
"bookmaker_name": "William Hill",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +13.9%",
"odds_delta_pct": 13.9
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +13.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": 13.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +13.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 13.1
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 4,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +12.5%",
"odds_delta_pct": 12.5
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 36,
"bookmaker_name": "BetVictor",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +10.5%",
"odds_delta_pct": 10.5
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 34,
"bookmaker_name": "Superbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +7.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": 7.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +6.8%",
"odds_delta_pct": 6.8
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 21,
"bookmaker_name": "888Sport",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +6.5%",
"odds_delta_pct": 6.5
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 9,
"bookmaker_name": "Dafabet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +5.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": 5.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 5,
"bookmaker_name": "SBO",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +4.5%",
"odds_delta_pct": 4.5
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +4.2%",
"odds_delta_pct": 4.2
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +2.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": 2.0
}
],
"books_total": 14,
"breadth_display": "12/14",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 2.7,
"is_drift": true,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2191 +13.4%",
"move_pct_abs": 13.4,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 107h 37m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"Multi-book drift on Hannover 96 (13.4%, 12/14) \u2014 aligned lengthening, market pricing moves against this side.",
"Noticeable drift \u2014 odds lengthened with multi-book confirmation (not steam)."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": 13.4,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"2.79",
"2.58",
"2.38"
],
"display": "2.79 \u2192 2.22 \u2192 2.70",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 107h 37m",
"pick_team": "Hannover 96",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "2.79"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "2.22"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.70"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
2.38,
2.79,
2.7
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 28.0,0.0 56.0,4.0",
"sparkline_trend": "up",
"sparkline_trend_label": "One-way rise",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "2.38"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "2.38"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "2.79"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "2.70"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 2.38,
"page_alert_line": "Broad drift across 12/14 sportsbooks on Hannover 96",
"phase_label": "Market drift",
"phase_tip": "Broad lengthening \u2014 market pricing moves against the tracked side.",
"pick_team": "Hannover 96",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "",
"sharp_leader": "Bet365",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "fade",
"signal_icon": "\u2198",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 2.7,
"is_drift": true,
"label": "Market Signal",
"move_display": "\u2191 +13.4%",
"open_odds": 2.38,
"summary": "Market moved away from Hannover 96 while the model still favours another side.",
"team": "Hannover 96",
"tone": "against"
},
"signal_key": "market_drift",
"signal_label": "Drift",
"steam_score": 48,
"steam_subtitle": "Moderate sharp signal",
"steam_tier": "B",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "12/14",
"current_odds": 2.7,
"move_display": "\u2191 +13.4%",
"open_odds": 2.38,
"pick_team": "Hannover 96",
"steam_score": 48,
"steam_team_name": "Hannover 96",
"steam_tier": "B"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 15.6,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "hannover-96",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Hannover 96",
"away_team_id": 166,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/166.webp",
"away_team_name": "Hannover 96",
"away_team_public_id": "1Kbx5KmKU1pa0y",
"away_team_slug": "hannover-96",
"country_code": "DE",
"country_display_name": "Germany",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/de.svg",
"country_id": 60,
"country_name": "Germany",
"fixture_id": 1576176,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Germany",
"home_team_display_name": "1. FC N\u00fcrnberg",
"home_team_id": 171,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/171.webp",
"home_team_name": "1. FC N\u00fcrnberg",
"home_team_public_id": "2SLod6bqVQAm9D",
"home_team_slug": "1-fc-nurnberg",
"ht.home_team_slug": "1-fc-nurnberg",
"league_country": "Germany",
"league_country_display": "Germany",
"league_display_name": "2. Bundesliga",
"league_id": 79,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/79.webp",
"league_name": "2. Bundesliga",
"league_public_id": "0Lxi3Z4aPBtEjI",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-11 16:30:00",
"public_id": "4whAacRtlj3Mu4",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Nuremberg",
"venue_name": "Max-Morlock-Stadion"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.5
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.3581,
"best_odd": 2.79,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0488,
"ev": 0.1032,
"implied_prob": 0.3467,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3467,
"draw": 0.2382,
"home": 0.4151
},
"model_prob": 0.4828,
"p_final": 0.3954
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.194,
"best_odd": 4.06,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0039,
"ev": -0.017,
"implied_prob": 0.2382,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3467,
"draw": 0.2382,
"home": 0.4151
},
"model_prob": 0.2583,
"p_final": 0.2421
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.3446,
"best_odd": 2.33,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0538,
"ev": -0.1582,
"implied_prob": 0.4151,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.3467,
"draw": 0.2382,
"home": 0.4151
},
"model_prob": 0.2589,
"p_final": 0.3613
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 2.79,
"edge": 0.1244,
"ev": 0.3471,
"implied_prob": 0.3584,
"model_prob": 0.4828
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 4.06,
"edge": 0.0119,
"ev": 0.0485,
"implied_prob": 0.2463,
"model_prob": 0.2583
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 2.33,
"edge": -0.1703,
"ev": -0.3967,
"implied_prob": 0.4292,
"model_prob": 0.2589
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.4001,
"alpha_yes": 0.5502,
"best_no_odd": 3.32,
"best_yes_odd": 1.43,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": 0.0701,
"edge_yes": -0.0701,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": 0.2749,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.0112,
"ev_yes": -0.1191,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.1277,
"implied_no": 0.3139,
"implied_yes": 0.6861,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.4001,
"best_odd": 2.85,
"edge": 0.0247,
"ev": -0.0112,
"implied_prob": 0.3222,
"model_prob": 0.384,
"p_final": 0.347
},
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.5502,
"best_odd": 1.355,
"edge": -0.034,
"ev": -0.1277,
"implied_prob": 0.6778,
"model_prob": 0.616,
"p_final": 0.6438
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"p_final_no": 0.347,
"p_final_yes": 0.6438,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.5486,
"alpha_under": 0.3983,
"best_over_odd": 1.51,
"best_under_odd": 3.26,
"consensus_over_odd": 1.4,
"consensus_under_odd": 2.7,
"edge_over": -0.0761,
"edge_under": 0.0771,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": -0.1016,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.1268,
"ev_under": 0.3236,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.0086,
"implied_over": 0.6711,
"implied_over_mf": 0.6585,
"implied_under": 0.3289,
"implied_under_mf": 0.3415,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.5486,
"best_odd": 1.4,
"edge": -0.0349,
"ev": -0.1268,
"implied_prob": 0.6585,
"model_prob": 0.595,
"p_final": 0.6237
},
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.3983,
"best_odd": 2.7,
"edge": 0.0257,
"ev": -0.0086,
"implied_prob": 0.3415,
"model_prob": 0.406,
"p_final": 0.3672
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.6237,
"p_final_under": 0.3672,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 3.08,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.3236,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3471,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.3236,
"confidence": 6.5,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"score": 4.4,
"score_v1_legacy": 6.5,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 3.9,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"score": 4.4,
"score_pre_penalty": 3.9
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "conflict",
"gap_pp": 15.6,
"key": "conflict",
"label": "Disagree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": false,
"pricing_key": "low",
"probability_gap_pp": 15.6,
"summary": "The market has moved away from Hannover 96, but the model still strongly favours Hannover 96."
},
"alignment_key": "conflict",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.3236,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3471,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 4.4,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 3.9,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 20,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Hannover 96 at 48.3%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 34.7%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Hannover 96 as the value side (48.3%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market pricing conflicts with the model lean",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model\u2013market disagreement blocks Primary sizing",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 13.6,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "The market has moved away from Hannover 96, but the model still strongly favours Hannover 96.",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Hannover 96",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"calibration_mode": null,
"codes": [
"market_conflict",
"market_quality"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_conflict",
"detail": "Model lean and market pricing / drift are not aligned.",
"name": "Market Conflict",
"short": "Market Conflict",
"subtype": "drift_against_model",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": false,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +32.4% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +32.4% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration Clear \u2705 \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 4.4/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +32.4% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: Clear \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 4.4/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "ok"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "57 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "20 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": false,
"value": "conflict"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+32.4% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 5,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"The market has moved away from Hannover 96, but the model still strongly favours Hannover 96.",
"Decision strength: 4.4/10",
"Reliability below 65"
],
"reliability_score": 57,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Market steam conflicts with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Clear xG separation"
],
"subline": "The market has moved away from Hannover 96, but the model still strongly favours Hannover 96.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": 0.1032,
"consensus_ev_display": "+10.3%",
"consensus_odds": 2.79,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.3467,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4828,
"raw_edge_display": "+13.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 13.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.35842293906810035,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.347,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+34.7%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": false,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": 33.3,
"reasons": [
"Clear xG separation gap=0.52"
],
"recommended_action": "ok",
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "clear",
"block_value_alert": false,
"separation_score": 5,
"strength_delta": 0.5,
"xg_gap": 0.52
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5927\u5f00\u5927\u5408\uff08\u8fdb\u7403\u578b\uff09",
"scoring_type": "high_scoring",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.616,
"draw_prob": 0.2583,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.4828,
"over_prob": 0.595,
"total_xg": 3.08,
"under_prob": 0.406,
"xg_diff": 0.52
},
"type": "high_scoring",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 2.79,
"decision": "value_bet",
"edge": 0.0488,
"ev": 0.1032,
"implied_prob": 0.3467,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.4828,
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Hannover 96"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.4001,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.85,
"edge": 0.0247,
"market_prob": 0.3222,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.384,
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.4001,
"best_odd": 2.85,
"edge": 0.0247,
"ev": -0.0112,
"implied_prob": 0.3222,
"model_prob": 0.384,
"p_final": 0.347
},
"p_final": 0.347,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0112,
"value_side": "no",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.5502,
"best_odd": 1.355,
"edge": -0.034,
"ev": -0.1277,
"implied_prob": 0.6778,
"model_prob": 0.616,
"p_final": 0.6438
}
},
"edge": 0.0701,
"ev": 0.2749,
"implied_prob": 0.3139,
"model_prob": 0.384,
"side": "no",
"value_side": "no"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.3983,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.7,
"edge": 0.0257,
"market_prob": 0.3415,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.406,
"n_bookmakers": 11,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.5486,
"best_odd": 1.4,
"edge": -0.0349,
"ev": -0.1268,
"implied_prob": 0.6585,
"model_prob": 0.595,
"p_final": 0.6237
},
"p_final": 0.3672,
"prediction_confidence": "high",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0086,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.3983,
"best_odd": 2.7,
"edge": 0.0257,
"ev": -0.0086,
"implied_prob": 0.3415,
"model_prob": 0.406,
"p_final": 0.3672
},
"value_side": "under"
},
"edge": 0.0771,
"ev": 0.3236,
"implied_prob": 0.3289,
"model_prob": 0.406,
"side": "under",
"value_side": "under"
}
},
"match_id": 1576176,
"match_regime": {
"action": "optional",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": false,
"code": "thin_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.3236,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 0.25,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.4828,
"draw": 0.2583,
"home": 0.2589
},
"reason_codes": [
"high_total_goals"
],
"secondary_pick": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1032,
"implied_prob": 0.3467,
"market": "1x2",
"model_prob": 0.4828,
"not_dominant": true,
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Hannover 96",
"slot": "secondary"
},
"secondary_picks": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1032,
"implied_prob": 0.3467,
"market": "1x2",
"model_prob": 0.4828,
"not_dominant": true,
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "away",
"side_label": "Hannover 96",
"slot": "secondary"
}
],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Hannover 96",
"home": "1. FC N\u00fcrnberg"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.124813,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.3236,
"implied_prob": 0.3289,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.406,
"not_dominant": true,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "under",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 3,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": 0.1032,
"consensus_ev_display": "+10.3%",
"consensus_odds": 2.79,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.3467,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.4828,
"raw_edge_display": "+13.6 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": 13.6,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.35842293906810035,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.347,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "+34.7%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1576176,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-11T16:29:31.382521+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Khám phá thêm nội dung dự đoán
Nhận dự đoán cao cấp cho 1. FC Nürnberg & Hannover 96!
Mở khóa phân tích chuyên sâu, mẹo cá cược độc quyền và dự đoán trận đấu với dịch vụ đăng ký cao cấp của chúng tôi.
Đăng ký ngay
2. Bundesliga — Bảng xếp hạng
| # | Đội | Tr | T | H | B | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hertha BSC | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 18 |
| 2 | 1. FC Nürnberg | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 16 |
| 3 | 1. FC Heidenheim | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 |
| 4 | VfL Wolfsburg | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
| 5 | 1. FC Kaiserslautern | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
| 6 | 1. FC Magdeburg | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| 7 | Energie Cottbus | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| 8 | FC St. Pauli | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 7 |
| 9 | VfL Bochum | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 10 | Hannover 96 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 11 | VfL Osnabrück | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 12 | SpVgg Greuther Fürth | 6 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 6 |
| 13 | Arminia Bielefeld | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 14 | Karlsruher SC | 6 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
| 15 | Eintracht Braunschweig | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| 16 | Holstein Kiel | 6 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| 17 | Dynamo Dresden | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| 18 | SV Darmstadt 98 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| # | Đội | Tr | BT | BB | +/- | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Hertha BSC | 6 | 17 | 7 | +10 | 18 |
| 2 | 1. FC Nürnberg | 6 | 16 | 6 | +10 | 16 |
| 3 | VfL Wolfsburg | 6 | 15 | 8 | +7 | 11 |
| 4 | 1. FC Heidenheim | 6 | 14 | 12 | +2 | 13 |
| 5 | Energie Cottbus | 6 | 14 | 13 | +1 | 8 |
| 6 | Eintracht Braunschweig | 6 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 4 |
| 7 | 1. FC Magdeburg | 6 | 11 | 9 | +2 | 10 |
| 8 | Arminia Bielefeld | 6 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 5 |
| 9 | SpVgg Greuther Fürth | 6 | 9 | 11 | -2 | 6 |
| 10 | VfL Osnabrück | 6 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 7 |
| 11 | FC St. Pauli | 6 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 7 |
| 12 | Dynamo Dresden | 6 | 8 | 14 | -6 | 4 |
| 13 | Hannover 96 | 6 | 7 | 9 | -2 | 7 |
| 14 | Holstein Kiel | 6 | 7 | 10 | -3 | 4 |
| 15 | 1. FC Kaiserslautern | 6 | 6 | 4 | +2 | 11 |
| 16 | Karlsruher SC | 6 | 6 | 12 | -6 | 5 |
| 17 | VfL Bochum | 6 | 5 | 6 | -1 | 7 |
| 18 | SV Darmstadt 98 | 6 | 5 | 13 | -8 | 4 |
| # | Đội | Tr | xG | xGC | +/- | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Arminia Bielefeld | 6 | 5.9 | 2.9 | +3.0 | 5 |
| 2 | Hannover 96 | 6 | 6.3 | 4.0 | +2.3 | 7 |
| 3 | VfL Wolfsburg | 6 | 6.0 | 3.7 | +2.3 | 11 |
| 4 | Hertha BSC | 6 | 7.5 | 5.6 | +1.9 | 18 |
| 5 | 1. FC Heidenheim | 6 | 7.7 | 6.0 | +1.7 | 13 |
| 6 | Holstein Kiel | 6 | 5.6 | 4.1 | +1.5 | 4 |
| 7 | FC St. Pauli | 6 | 5.7 | 4.3 | +1.4 | 7 |
| 8 | VfL Bochum | 6 | 3.8 | 2.6 | +1.2 | 7 |
| 9 | Eintracht Braunschweig | 6 | 9.4 | 8.5 | +0.9 | 4 |
| 10 | SpVgg Greuther Fürth | 6 | 6.9 | 7.0 | -0.1 | 6 |
| 11 | 1. FC Kaiserslautern | 6 | 2.6 | 3.2 | -0.6 | 11 |
| 12 | 1. FC Nürnberg | 6 | 4.2 | 5.2 | -1.0 | 16 |
| 13 | Karlsruher SC | 6 | 3.8 | 5.3 | -1.5 | 5 |
| 14 | VfL Osnabrück | 6 | 5.7 | 7.7 | -2.0 | 7 |
| 15 | SV Darmstadt 98 | 6 | 2.0 | 4.3 | -2.3 | 4 |
| 16 | Dynamo Dresden | 6 | 3.4 | 5.8 | -2.4 | 4 |
| 17 | 1. FC Magdeburg | 6 | 4.7 | 7.7 | -3.0 | 10 |
| 18 | Energie Cottbus | 6 | 5.0 | 8.3 | -3.3 | 8 |
