AI correctly predicted the Lorca Deportiva win.
The match finished 1–0, validating the model's directional assessment.
Thị trường được theo dõi so với kết quả toàn thời gian
Cấp dự đoán
F
Mỗi hàng so sánh mô hình trước trận đấu với kết quả toàn thời gian.
- Chợ Dự đoán Kết quả kết quả
- Tài / Xỉu 2.5 Tài 2.5 Xỉu 2.5 (1 mục tiêu) ✖ Không đúng
- Cả Hai Đội Đều Ghi Bàn BTTS Có Không ✖ Không đúng
- 1X2 Lorca Deportiva Lorca Deportiva ✔ Chính xác
- Thông tin tỷ số chính xác 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 1-0 ✔ Chính xác
Mô hình so với thị trường đóng cửa
| kết quả | Người mẫu | Thị trường đóng cửa | Sự khác biệt | Tín hiệu |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lorca Deportiva | 36.1% | 44.3% | -8.2 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 29.6% | 31.9% | -2.3 pp | Aligned |
| Castellonense | 34.2% | 23.8% | +10.4 pp | Model Edge |
The statistical model estimates Castellonense's win probability at 34.2%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 23.8%, a difference of 10.4 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
Sau toàn thời gian, độ nghiêng định hướng của mô hình khớp với kết quả (Lorca Deportiva win 1–0).
Market Assessment
The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Castellonense.
- The model may see a slower-scoring or closer matchup than the market.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Exact score 1–0 fell within the model's highlighted bins
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Over 2.5; match finished Under 2.5 (1 goals)
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Lorca Deportiva more conservatively (25.7% vs model 36.1%, 10.4 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Lorca Deportiva win 1–0).
Nhà cái cao cấp stake: người mới có thể dùng mã khuyến mãi FHn2uDc1. Đăng ký ngay
Dòng thời gian dự đoán
Dự đoán này chuyển từ dự báo sang đánh giá toàn thời gian như thế nào.
-
Sep 27, 2026 · 16:59 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Lorca Deportiva 36.1% · Draw 29.7% · Castellonense 34.2%
- xG · Lorca Deportiva 1.32 — Castellonense 1.28
-
Sep 27, 2026 · 16:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Lorca Deportiva 2.07 · Draw 2.87 · Castellonense 3.85
- Implied 1X2 · Lorca Deportiva 44.3% · Draw 31.9% · Castellonense 23.8%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 27, 2026 · 16:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Lorca Deportiva 2.07 · Draw 2.87 · Castellonense 3.85
- Implied 1X2 · Lorca Deportiva 44.3% · Draw 31.9% · Castellonense 23.8%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 27, 2026 · 17:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Lorca Deportiva win · 1–0
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Ảnh chụp lịch sử
Bị treo khi bắt đầu — kết quả đầu ra của mô hình như trước khi trận đấu bắt đầu.
Phán quyết lịch sử:
Monitor
Quyết định lịch sử
Monitor
kết quả
Validated
Số liệu trước trận đấu (bối cảnh lịch sử)
Độ tin cậy dự đoán
58/100
· Moderate
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (10 pp)
Chứng cớ
★★★★★
- Statistical edge detected
- Market has already priced much of the edge
- Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap)
47/100
Betting Confidence
46/100
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
3.85
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
Pending
Final Result
Lorca Deportiva win · Lorca Deportiva 1–0 Castellonense
Prediction
✔ Correct
Decision Grade
F
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Xem lại câu hỏi thường gặp
- Dự đoán đó chính xác đến mức nào?
- Trang này xếp loại các thị trường định hướng (1X2, Trên/Dưới 2,5, BTTS) so với kết quả toàn thời gian. Mức dự đoán phản ánh có bao nhiêu thị trường được theo dõi phù hợp với thực tế.
- Độ chính xác xG đo lường điều gì?
- Độ chính xác của xG so sánh hồ sơ bàn thắng dự kiến trước trận đấu của mô hình với tỷ số thực tế — chứ không phải liệu mọi thị trường có thành công hay không. Đánh giá mang tính định hướng mạnh mẽ có thể cùng tồn tại với điểm chính xác xG vừa phải.
- Tại sao tỷ số chính xác không được dự đoán?
- Các kết quả có tỷ số chính xác là các kết quả có xác suất thấp ngay cả khi mô hình đọc tốt hồ sơ trận đấu. Chúng tôi nêu bật các thùng điểm cao nhất cho ngữ cảnh; thiếu dòng chính xác không làm mất hiệu lực của đánh giá định hướng.
- Điều này có cải thiện bản ghi AI không?
- Mỗi trận đấu kết thúc sẽ được ghi vào hệ thống xác thực của chúng tôi. Tỷ lệ trúng tổng hợp và nghiên cứu CLV được xuất bản riêng - trang này là đường dẫn kiểm tra mỗi trận đấu.
Dự đoán chỉ nhằm mục đích thông tin. Luôn đánh bạc có trách nhiệm và trong giới hạn của bạn. Hiệu suất trong quá khứ không đảm bảo kết quả trong tương lai.
Chưa có briefing AI cho trận này. Sau khi nâng cấp máy chủ, chạy lại «Tạo tỷ lệ hàng loạt» để tạo bản tóm tắt.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "0dc4c603e1f4ab37df0efbd774c3ee3dad44c052f7e7b8e9826290effdddbcbf",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.28,
"away_win_prob": 0.3424,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.455,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2965,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 2.92,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.37,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.77,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.32,
"home_win_prob": 0.3611,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Combo Double chance : draw or Castellonense and -3.5 goals",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "45%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "10%",
"winner_name": "Castellonense"
},
"away_xg": 1.28,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Lorca Deportiva",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": -0.0818,
"edge_gap": 0.0185,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.4427,
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 34.2,
"draw": 29.7,
"home": 36.1
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 2.07
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 2.07,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Lorca Deportiva Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Home",
"market_fair_odds": 2.26,
"market_odds": 2.07,
"model_odds": 2.77,
"overround": 9.1,
"prob_edge": -12.2,
"value_pct": -25.3,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 1,
"away_failed_to_score": 0,
"away_played": 3,
"away_score_rate": 72.2,
"home_clean_sheet": 1,
"home_failed_to_score": 2,
"home_played": 3,
"home_score_rate": 73.3,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 54.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.28,
"home_expected": 1.32,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.8
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.5
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.3
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.0
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Lorca Deportiva or Draw",
"prob": 65.7
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Lorca Deportiva or Castellonense",
"prob": 70.3
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Castellonense",
"prob": 63.8
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Lorca Deportiva or Castellonense",
"pick_prob": 70.3
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 34.2,
"draw_pct": 29.6,
"home_pct": 36.1,
"lean_key": "home",
"lean_label": "Lorca Deportiva"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": "-3.5",
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 1.7,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 0.3,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Over 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 31.7,
"implied_prob": 26.0,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Castellonense Win",
"model_prob": 34.2,
"odds": 3.85
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"away_team": "Castellonense",
"closing_1x2_probs_pct": {
"away": 23.8,
"draw": 31.93,
"home": 44.27
},
"closing_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_fetched_at": "2026-09-27 16:59:14",
"early_bookmaker": "Pinnacle",
"early_capture": "PRE30",
"early_fetched_at": "2026-09-27 16:29:46",
"has_data": true,
"home_team": "Lorca Deportiva",
"largest_move_kind": null,
"max_abs_move_pp": 0.0,
"model_vs_closing": [
{
"closing_implied_pct": 44.27,
"gap_pp": -8.18,
"kind": "1x2_h",
"model_pct": 36.09
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 31.93,
"gap_pp": -2.26,
"kind": "1x2_d",
"model_pct": 29.67
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 23.8,
"gap_pp": 10.44,
"kind": "1x2_a",
"model_pct": 34.24
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 39.13,
"gap_pp": 9.07,
"kind": "ou_o",
"model_pct": 48.2
},
{
"closing_implied_pct": 60.87,
"gap_pp": -9.07,
"kind": "ou_u",
"model_pct": 51.8
}
],
"movement": [
{
"closing": 2.07,
"early": 2.07,
"implied_closing_pct": 44.27,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 44.27,
"kind": "1x2_h"
},
{
"closing": 2.87,
"early": 2.87,
"implied_closing_pct": 31.93,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 31.93,
"kind": "1x2_d"
},
{
"closing": 3.85,
"early": 3.85,
"implied_closing_pct": 23.8,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 23.8,
"kind": "1x2_a"
},
{
"closing": 2.38,
"early": 2.38,
"implied_closing_pct": 39.13,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 39.13,
"kind": "ou_o"
},
{
"closing": 1.53,
"early": 1.53,
"implied_closing_pct": 60.87,
"implied_delta_pp": 0.0,
"implied_early_pct": 60.87,
"kind": "ou_u"
}
],
"movement_negligible": true,
"same_bookmaker": true,
"top_value_gap": {
"gap_pp": 10.4,
"kind": "1x2_a"
}
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -1.8,
"ev": -0.125,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 7.0,
"market_prob": 0.1429,
"market_prob_pct": 14.3,
"model_prob": 0.125,
"model_prob_pct": 12.5,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 9.8
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.5
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.3
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 8.0
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.32,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1947,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.01,
"edge": 0.0175,
"edge_pp": 1.8,
"market_prob": 0.4553,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.545,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2142,
"best_odd": 1.68,
"edge": -0.0192,
"ev": -0.1172,
"implied_prob": 0.5447,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.5255
},
"p_final": 0.4728,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 9.0,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0955,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0498,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.1947,
"best_odd": 2.01,
"edge": 0.0175,
"ev": -0.0498,
"implied_prob": 0.4553,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.4728
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.2265,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -22.7,
"text": "-22.7%"
},
"ev_yes": 0.1173,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 11.7,
"text": "+11.7%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.1173,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"sort_key": 10255.57,
"tier": "best",
"value_side": "yes",
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1574,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.31,
"edge": 0.0132,
"edge_pp": 1.3,
"market_prob": 0.3984,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.1574,
"best_odd": 2.31,
"edge": 0.0132,
"ev": -0.0492,
"implied_prob": 0.3984,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.4116
},
"p_final": 0.4116,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 8.4,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.1134,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0492,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2165,
"best_odd": 1.53,
"edge": -0.0181,
"ev": -0.1073,
"implied_prob": 0.6016,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.5835
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.1472,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 14.7,
"text": "+14.7%"
},
"ev_under": -0.1867,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -18.7,
"text": "-18.7%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.1472,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 10132.48,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "over"
},
{
"authority_action": "monitor",
"authority_note": "Validation pending \u2014 monitor the line before acting.",
"consensus_odds": 2.07,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"ev": -0.1504,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -15.0,
"text": "-15.0%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.4427,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": 0.018,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 1.8,
"text": "+1.8%"
},
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"raw_edge_display": "-8.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -8.2,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2529,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-25.3%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Lorca Deportiva",
"sort_key": 5214.4,
"tier": "lean"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.5,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.5
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "5/9",
"alert_breadth_note": "5/9 sportsbooks confirmed",
"alert_move": "\u2191 +11.1%",
"alert_team": "Castellonense",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 10.4,
"has_alert": false,
"hero_edge_pp": 10.44,
"hero_label": "Castellonense",
"market_prob_pct": 44.3,
"market_team": "Lorca Deportiva",
"model_prob_pct": 36.1,
"model_team": "Lorca Deportiva",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "!",
"status_key": "caution",
"status_label": "Use caution",
"status_line": "Use caution \u2014 signals are mixed",
"steam_score": 34,
"steam_subtitle": "Limited conviction",
"steam_tier": "C",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "market_disagree",
"read_min": 5,
"title": "When Should You Trust AI Over the Market?",
"url": "/academy/ai-betting/when-should-you-trust-ai-over-the-market/en"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 10.4,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 10.4,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Lorca Deportiva)."
},
"authority": {
"action": "monitor",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 10.4,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 10.4,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Lorca Deportiva)."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1472,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3182,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 4.8,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.8,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 52,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Monitor - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Lorca Deportiva at 36.1%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 44.3%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Lorca Deportiva as the value side (36.1%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 8.2,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Monitor - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\ud83d\udc41",
"label": "Monitor \u2014 validate before acting",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Lorca Deportiva",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market BTTS \u00b7 side Lorca Deportiva \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.42 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +32% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1572672 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.42 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +14.7% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +14.7% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +14.7% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 4.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +14.7% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 4.8/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "66 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "52 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+14.7% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 7,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Lorca Deportiva).",
"Decision strength: 4.8/10",
"Execution confidence below 65",
"Outlier price +32% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 66,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Validation pending \u2014 monitor the line before acting.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "monitor",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1504,
"consensus_ev_display": "-15.0%",
"consensus_odds": 2.07,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4427,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"raw_edge_display": "-8.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -8.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.48309178743961356,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2529,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-25.3%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -2.2,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.04 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.04
}
}
},
"bet_status": "monitor",
"books_breadth_display": "5/9",
"breadth_ratio": 0.5555555555555556,
"evidence": {
"score": 80,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "Statistical edge detected",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Direction agrees; pricing still diverges",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u2713",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift supports model side (direction only \u2014 not pricing convergence)",
"status": "pass"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation warning",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 4,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Warning",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "gap",
"label": "Large market gap (10 pp)",
"tone": "caution"
},
{
"key": "steam",
"label": "Market drift aligns with model",
"tone": "ok"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 19.8,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 5.6,
"steam_coherence": 10.0,
"validation": 14.0
},
"score": 66,
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 10.44,
"market_agreement": "weak",
"max_gap_pp": 10.44,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.28,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -2.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.32,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.32,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.32 \u00b7 Away xG 1.28 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -2%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": true,
"mv_status": "warning",
"odds_delta_pct": 11.1,
"steam_conflicts": false,
"steam_move_display": "\u2191 +11.1%",
"steam_team": "Castellonense",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 52,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 59,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 59,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "monitor",
"label": "Monitor - No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "Validation pending \u2014 monitor the line before acting.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 10.4,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 10.4,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Lorca Deportiva)."
},
"authority": {
"action": "monitor",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 10.4,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 10.4,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Lorca Deportiva)."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1472,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3182,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 4.8,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.8,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 52,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Monitor - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Lorca Deportiva at 36.1%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 44.3%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Lorca Deportiva as the value side (36.1%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 8.2,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Monitor - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\ud83d\udc41",
"label": "Monitor \u2014 validate before acting",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Lorca Deportiva",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market BTTS \u00b7 side Lorca Deportiva \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.42 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +32% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1572672 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.42 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +14.7% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +14.7% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +14.7% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 4.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +14.7% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 4.8/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "66 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "52 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+14.7% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 7,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Lorca Deportiva).",
"Decision strength: 4.8/10",
"Execution confidence below 65",
"Outlier price +32% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 66,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Validation pending \u2014 monitor the line before acting.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "monitor",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1504,
"consensus_ev_display": "-15.0%",
"consensus_odds": 2.07,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4427,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"raw_edge_display": "-8.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -8.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.48309178743961356,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2529,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-25.3%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -2.2,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.04 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.04
}
}
},
"headline": "Monitor - No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\ud83d\udc41",
"label": "Monitor \u2014 validate before acting",
"subline": "Validation pending \u2014 monitor the line before acting.",
"tier": "monitor"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Lorca Deportiva 1.32 xG vs Castellonense 1.28 \u2192 Lorca Deportiva 36.1%",
"Market: Lorca Deportiva ~44.3% implied",
"Market Drift: Castellonense odds \u2191 +11.1%"
],
"one_liner": "Model and market both lean Lorca Deportiva with no major conflict.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": -8.16,
"fair_prob": 36.11,
"label": "Lorca Deportiva",
"market_prob": 44.27,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": -2.28,
"fair_prob": 29.65,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": 31.93,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": 10.44,
"fair_prob": 34.24,
"label": "Castellonense",
"market_prob": 23.8,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": 8.42,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 39.78,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": -8.42,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 60.22,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": 8.86,
"fair_prob": 54.5,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 45.64,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": -8.86,
"fair_prob": 45.5,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 54.36,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {
"edge_label": "strong_disagreement",
"edge_pp": 10.44,
"fair_prob_pct": 34.24,
"hero_side": "away",
"hero_team_name": "Castellonense",
"market_prob_pct": 23.8,
"status": "strong_disagreement",
"steam_team_name": "Castellonense"
},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "PRE1",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"comparison_available": true,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "The statistical model estimates Castellonense\u0027s win probability at 34.2%, compared with the closing market\u0027s implied probability of 23.8%, a difference of 10.4 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model\u0027s assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "strong",
"edge_status": "strong_disagreement",
"max_gap_pp": 10.44,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "Strong model-market divergence",
"divergence_level": "strong",
"divergence_level_label": "Strong divergence",
"divergence_note": "The fair estimate differs noticeably from current market pricing. This may reflect genuine disagreement or incomplete rating inputs.",
"divergence_tier": "strong",
"edge_label": "Strong disagreement",
"edge_label_key": "strong_disagreement",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Lorca Deportiva",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_direction": {
"label": "Supports model direction",
"positive": true
},
"market_prob_pct": 44.3,
"model_prob_gap_display": "-8.2 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": -8.2,
"model_prob_pct": 36.1,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "-8.2 percentage points",
"gap_pp": -8.2,
"label": "Moderate",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_moderate"
},
"reliability_headline": "Moderate reliability",
"reliability_icon": "\u2713",
"reliability_score": 66,
"reliability_tier": "moderate",
"summary": "Lorca Deportiva \u2014 market direction supports the model lean.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Warning",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 52,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 59,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 36,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Pricing proximity (inverse gap)",
"note": "This score falls as the probability gap (pp) rises \u2014 it is NOT a bet green light. Direction may still agree (see Alignment above). Formula: proximity = max(0, 100 \u2212 5\u00d7pp). Example: 16 pp \u2192 20/100 (diverged).",
"score": 59,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "monitor",
"label": "Monitor - No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Lorca Deportiva 1.32 xG vs Castellonense 1.28 \u2192 Lorca Deportiva 36.1%",
"Market: Lorca Deportiva ~44.3% implied",
"Market Drift: Castellonense odds \u2191 +11.1%"
],
"one_liner": "Model and market both lean Lorca Deportiva with no major conflict.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": true,
"hero_edge_pp": 10.44,
"hero_label": "Castellonense",
"hero_side": "away",
"market_activity": "Castellonense odds lengthened \u2191 +11.1%.",
"market_agreement": "weak",
"market_agreement_label": "Weak",
"market_interpretation": {
"bullets": [
"The model may see a slower-scoring or closer matchup than the market.",
"Monitor line movement before kickoff \u2014 not a betting recommendation."
],
"follow_up": "",
"gap_tier": "strong",
"lead": "The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Castellonense.",
"note": "Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on Castellonense.",
"paragraphs": [
"The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Castellonense.",
"Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on Castellonense."
],
"quiet_market": false,
"title": "Market Assessment"
},
"market_narrative": {
"paragraphs": [
"The fair estimate favors Castellonense more strongly than current market pricing.",
"Recent line movement on Castellonense (\u2191 +11.1%) aligns with the pricing gap."
],
"title": "Current Market Narrative"
},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 10.44,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_warning",
"status": "warning"
},
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Top two 1X2 outcomes within 1.9 percentage points."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 1.9,
"max_prob_pct": 36.1,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "strong",
"largest_gap_label": "Castellonense",
"largest_gap_pp": 10.4,
"lead": "The model rates Castellonense considerably stronger than the closing betting market.",
"level": "strong",
"max_gap_pp": 10.4,
"title": "Strong Disagreement"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": -8.16,
"edge_pp": -8.16,
"fair_prob_pct": 36.11,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Lorca Deportiva",
"market_prob_pct": 44.27,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "market_higher",
"signal_label": "Market Higher"
},
{
"difference_pp": -2.28,
"edge_pp": -2.28,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.65,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": 31.93,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "aligned",
"signal_label": "Aligned"
},
{
"difference_pp": 10.44,
"edge_pp": 10.44,
"fair_prob_pct": 34.24,
"is_hero": true,
"label": "Castellonense",
"market_prob_pct": 23.8,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "model_edge",
"signal_label": "Model Edge"
}
],
"status": "strong_disagreement",
"status_label": "Strong Disagreement",
"steam_note": "Market activity aligns with the largest pricing gap on Castellonense.",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": false,
"paragraphs": [
"The betting market strongly prefers Lorca Deportiva (44.3%).",
"Castellonense odds have drifted longer across books (\u2191 +11.1%, 5/9) \u2014 market pricing moves against this side.",
"Lorca Deportiva \u2014 market direction supports the model lean."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": 25.97,
"closing_odds": 3.85,
"closing_reason": "",
"closing_status": "recorded",
"closing_status_label": "Recorded",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": 0.0,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "waiting_for_kickoff",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Waiting for kickoff",
"entry_implied_pct": 25.97,
"entry_odds": 3.85,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Warning",
"model_validation_status": "warning",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "PRE1",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"books_reacting": 5,
"books_reacting_detail": [
{
"bookmaker_id": 11,
"bookmaker_name": "1xBet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +27.6%",
"odds_delta_pct": 27.6
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 2,
"bookmaker_name": "Marathonbet",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +27.2%",
"odds_delta_pct": 27.2
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 32,
"bookmaker_name": "Betano",
"is_sharp": false,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +22.4%",
"odds_delta_pct": 22.4
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 3,
"bookmaker_name": "Betfair",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +20.0%",
"odds_delta_pct": 20.0
},
{
"bookmaker_id": 8,
"bookmaker_name": "Bet365",
"is_sharp": true,
"move_delta_display": "\u2191 +11.1%",
"odds_delta_pct": 11.1
}
],
"books_total": 9,
"breadth_display": "5/9",
"clv_label": "+0.00 pp",
"clv_status": "evaluated",
"current_odds": 3.2,
"is_drift": true,
"move_context": "Largest move today",
"move_display": "\u2191 +11.1%",
"move_pct_abs": 11.1,
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 105h 30m",
"narrative_paragraphs": [
"Multi-book drift on Castellonense (11.1%, 5/9) \u2014 aligned lengthening, market pricing moves against this side.",
"Modest lengthening \u2014 treat as drift tracking rather than steam."
],
"narrative_title": "Market Narrative",
"odds_delta_pct": 11.1,
"odds_path": {
"chart_y_labels": [
"3.85",
"3.37",
"2.88"
],
"display": "5.26 \u2192 2.83 \u2192 3.20",
"move_speed_icon": "\ud83d\udc22",
"move_speed_label": "Slow drift over 105h 30m",
"pick_team": "Castellonense",
"points": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "5.26"
},
{
"label_key": "extreme",
"value": "2.83"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.20"
}
],
"sparkline_points": [
2.88,
3.85,
3.2
],
"sparkline_polyline": "0.0,18.0 28.0,0.0 56.0,12.1",
"sparkline_trend": "volatile",
"sparkline_trend_label": "V-shape swing",
"summary_boxes": [
{
"label_key": "open",
"value": "2.88"
},
{
"label_key": "low",
"value": "2.88"
},
{
"label_key": "high",
"value": "3.85"
},
{
"label_key": "current",
"value": "3.20"
}
]
},
"open_odds": 2.88,
"page_alert_line": "",
"phase_label": "Market drift",
"phase_tip": "Broad lengthening \u2014 market pricing moves against the tracked side.",
"pick_team": "Castellonense",
"ref_book": "Bet365",
"seo_title_alert": "",
"sharp_leader": "Betfair",
"show": true,
"signal_badge_class": "fade",
"signal_icon": "\u2198",
"signal_impact": {
"current_odds": 3.2,
"is_drift": true,
"label": "Market Signal",
"move_display": "\u2191 +11.1%",
"open_odds": 2.88,
"summary": "Broad market drift supports the same direction as the model lean.",
"team": "Castellonense",
"tone": "with"
},
"signal_key": "market_drift",
"signal_label": "Drift",
"steam_score": 34,
"steam_subtitle": "Limited conviction",
"steam_tier": "C",
"title": "Market Move Intelligence"
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "5/9",
"current_odds": 3.2,
"move_display": "\u2191 +11.1%",
"open_odds": 2.88,
"pick_team": "Castellonense",
"steam_score": 34,
"steam_team_name": "Castellonense",
"steam_tier": "C"
},
"premium_teaser": {
"current_divergence_pp": 10.4,
"divergence_label": "Current divergence",
"title": "Premium Market Intelligence",
"unlock_items": [
"Historical similar matches",
"Closing odds analysis",
"CLV tracking",
"Sharp money signals",
"Market efficiency rating",
"Historical model vs market results"
],
"unlock_label": "Unlock"
},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "castellonense",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Castellonense",
"away_team_id": 22138,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/22138.webp",
"away_team_name": "Castellonense",
"away_team_public_id": "2CV3W6OjTTgoNU",
"away_team_slug": "castellonense",
"country_code": "ES",
"country_display_name": "Spain",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/es.svg",
"country_id": 145,
"country_name": "Spain",
"fixture_id": 1572672,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "Spain",
"home_team_display_name": "Lorca Deportiva",
"home_team_id": 9400,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/9400.webp",
"home_team_name": "Lorca Deportiva",
"home_team_public_id": "2iLd7vLPuRzTK1",
"home_team_slug": "lorca-deportiva",
"ht.home_team_slug": "lorca-deportiva",
"league_country": "Spain",
"league_country_display": "Spain",
"league_display_name": "Segunda Divisi\u00f3n RFEF - Nh\u00f3m 3",
"league_id": 877,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/877.webp",
"league_name": "Segunda Divisi\u00f3n RFEF - Nh\u00f3m 3",
"league_public_id": "20Q4MJCVOREU7Q",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-09-27 17:00:00",
"public_id": "5cKX7HC61Nukkw",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Lorca",
"venue_name": null
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.253,
"best_odd": 3.85,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0264,
"ev": 0.018,
"implied_prob": 0.238,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.238,
"draw": 0.3193,
"home": 0.4427
},
"model_prob": 0.3424,
"p_final": 0.2644
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.4347,
"best_odd": 2.87,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0098,
"ev": -0.1119,
"implied_prob": 0.3193,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.238,
"draw": 0.3193,
"home": 0.4427
},
"model_prob": 0.2967,
"p_final": 0.3095
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.3948,
"best_odd": 2.07,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0323,
"ev": -0.1504,
"implied_prob": 0.4427,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.238,
"draw": 0.3193,
"home": 0.4427
},
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"p_final": 0.4104
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 3.85,
"edge": 0.0827,
"ev": 0.3182,
"implied_prob": 0.2597,
"model_prob": 0.3424
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 2.87,
"edge": -0.0518,
"ev": -0.1485,
"implied_prob": 0.3484,
"model_prob": 0.2967
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 2.07,
"edge": -0.1222,
"ev": -0.2529,
"implied_prob": 0.4831,
"model_prob": 0.3609
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.2142,
"alpha_yes": 0.1947,
"best_no_odd": 1.7,
"best_yes_odd": 2.05,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": -0.0886,
"edge_yes": 0.0886,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.2265,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.1172,
"ev_yes": 0.1173,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0498,
"implied_no": 0.5436,
"implied_yes": 0.4564,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2142,
"best_odd": 1.68,
"edge": -0.0192,
"ev": -0.1172,
"implied_prob": 0.5447,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.5255
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.1947,
"best_odd": 2.01,
"edge": 0.0175,
"ev": -0.0498,
"implied_prob": 0.4553,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.4728
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"p_final_no": 0.5255,
"p_final_yes": 0.4728,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.1574,
"alpha_under": 0.2165,
"best_over_odd": 2.38,
"best_under_odd": 1.57,
"consensus_over_odd": 2.31,
"consensus_under_odd": 1.53,
"edge_over": 0.0842,
"edge_under": -0.0842,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.1472,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.0492,
"ev_under": -0.1867,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.1073,
"implied_over": 0.3978,
"implied_over_mf": 0.3984,
"implied_under": 0.6022,
"implied_under_mf": 0.6016,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.1574,
"best_odd": 2.31,
"edge": 0.0132,
"ev": -0.0492,
"implied_prob": 0.3984,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.4116
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2165,
"best_odd": 1.53,
"edge": -0.0181,
"ev": -0.1073,
"implied_prob": 0.6016,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.5835
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.4116,
"p_final_under": 0.5835,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1472,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3182,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.1472,
"confidence": 6.5,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_primary_ev_above_10",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_v1_multi_ev_lines"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Primary EV above 10% (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)",
"Two or more valid +EV lines at threshold (+0.5)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 4.8,
"score_v1_legacy": 6.5,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 6.8,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 4.8,
"score_pre_penalty": 6.8
},
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "monitor",
"final_decision": {
"action": "monitor",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": true,
"direction_key": "agree",
"gap_pp": 10.4,
"key": "agree",
"label": "Agree",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "moderate",
"probability_gap_pp": 10.4,
"summary": "Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Lorca Deportiva)."
},
"alignment_key": "agree",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.1472,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.3182,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 4.8,
"decision_strength_v1": 6.5,
"decision_strength_v2": 6.8,
"decision_type": "VALUE_ALERT",
"execution_confidence": 52,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "Monitor - No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Lorca Deportiva at 36.1%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 44.3%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Lorca Deportiva as the value side (36.1%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market broadly agrees with the direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 8.2,
"gates_failed": [
"Execution confidence below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "Monitor - No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\ud83d\udc41",
"label": "Monitor \u2014 validate before acting",
"market_signal": "Market aligns with model lean",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Lorca Deportiva",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market BTTS \u00b7 side Lorca Deportiva \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.42 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +32% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1572672 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.42 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +14.7% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +14.7% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Execution confidence below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +14.7% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 4.8/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +14.7% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 4.8/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": true,
"value": "66 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "52 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "agree"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+14.7% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 7,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Model and market currently agree on the stronger side (Lorca Deportiva).",
"Decision strength: 4.8/10",
"Execution confidence below 65",
"Outlier price +32% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 66,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Reliability supports action",
"Market aligns with model",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Validation pending \u2014 monitor the line before acting.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "monitor",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1504,
"consensus_ev_display": "-15.0%",
"consensus_odds": 2.07,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4427,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"raw_edge_display": "-8.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -8.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.48309178743961356,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2529,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-25.3%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -2.2,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.04 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.04
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"draw_prob": 0.2967,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.3609,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.04
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 2.07,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": -0.0323,
"ev": -0.1504,
"implied_prob": 0.4427,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"side": "home",
"side_label": "Lorca Deportiva"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1947,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.01,
"edge": 0.0175,
"market_prob": 0.4553,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.545,
"n_bookmakers": 5,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.2142,
"best_odd": 1.68,
"edge": -0.0192,
"ev": -0.1172,
"implied_prob": 0.5447,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.5255
},
"p_final": 0.4728,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0498,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.1947,
"best_odd": 2.01,
"edge": 0.0175,
"ev": -0.0498,
"implied_prob": 0.4553,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.4728
}
},
"edge": 0.0886,
"ev": 0.1173,
"implied_prob": 0.4564,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"side": "yes",
"value_side": "yes"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.1574,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.31,
"edge": 0.0132,
"market_prob": 0.3984,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"n_bookmakers": 6,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.1574,
"best_odd": 2.31,
"edge": 0.0132,
"ev": -0.0492,
"implied_prob": 0.3984,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.4116
},
"p_final": 0.4116,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0492,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2165,
"best_odd": 1.53,
"edge": -0.0181,
"ev": -0.1073,
"implied_prob": 0.6016,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.5835
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"edge": 0.0842,
"ev": 0.1472,
"implied_prob": 0.3978,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"side": "over",
"value_side": "over"
}
},
"match_id": 1572672,
"match_regime": {
"action": "bet",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": true,
"code": "clear_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.1472,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 1.0,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3424,
"draw": 0.2967,
"home": 0.3609
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2"
],
"secondary_pick": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1472,
"implied_prob": 0.3978,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"not_dominant": true,
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "over",
"slot": "secondary"
},
"secondary_picks": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1472,
"implied_prob": 0.3978,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"not_dominant": true,
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "secondary",
"side": "over",
"slot": "secondary"
}
],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Castellonense",
"home": "Lorca Deportiva"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.063928,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.1173,
"implied_prob": 0.4564,
"market": "btts",
"model_prob": 0.545,
"not_dominant": false,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "strong",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "yes",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 2,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1504,
"consensus_ev_display": "-15.0%",
"consensus_odds": 2.07,
"disagreement_label": "Moderate",
"disagreement_level": "moderate",
"implied_prob": 0.4427,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3609,
"raw_edge_display": "-8.2 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -8.2,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.48309178743961356,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.2529,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-25.3%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1572672,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-09-27T16:59:16.301868+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Khám phá thêm nội dung dự đoán
Nhận dự đoán cao cấp cho Lorca Deportiva & Castellonense!
Mở khóa phân tích chuyên sâu, mẹo cá cược độc quyền và dự đoán trận đấu với dịch vụ đăng ký cao cấp của chúng tôi.
Đăng ký ngay
Segunda División RFEF - Nhóm 3 — Bảng xếp hạng
| # | Đội | Tr | T | H | B | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Castellón II | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 9 |
| 2 | La Nucía | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| 3 | Castellonense | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
| 4 | Orihuela | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| 5 | UCAM Murcia | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| 6 | Intercity | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| 7 | Deportiva Minera | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| 8 | Mallorca B | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| 9 | Cieza | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 10 | Elche II | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 11 | Yeclano | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 12 | Alcoyano | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| 13 | Lorca Deportiva | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| 14 | Valencia II | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 15 | Peña Deportiva | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 16 | Atlético Baleares | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
| 17 | Poblense | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| 18 | Real Murcia B | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| # | Đội | Tr | BT | BB | +/- | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Castellón II | 4 | 10 | 4 | +6 | 9 |
| 2 | La Nucía | 3 | 7 | 1 | +6 | 9 |
| 3 | UCAM Murcia | 3 | 6 | 3 | +3 | 6 |
| 4 | Orihuela | 4 | 6 | 7 | -1 | 7 |
| 5 | Castellonense | 3 | 5 | 2 | +3 | 9 |
| 6 | Intercity | 3 | 4 | 3 | +1 | 5 |
| 7 | Deportiva Minera | 3 | 3 | 2 | +1 | 5 |
| 8 | Alcoyano | 3 | 3 | 4 | -1 | 4 |
| 9 | Atlético Baleares | 3 | 3 | 7 | -4 | 1 |
| 10 | Mallorca B | 3 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 5 |
| 11 | Cieza | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 12 | Elche II | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 13 | Yeclano | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| 14 | Valencia II | 3 | 2 | 4 | -2 | 1 |
| 15 | Real Murcia B | 3 | 2 | 8 | -6 | 0 |
| 16 | Lorca Deportiva | 3 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 2 |
| 17 | Peña Deportiva | 3 | 1 | 3 | -2 | 1 |
| 18 | Poblense | 3 | 1 | 5 | -4 | 0 |
