AI correctly predicted the Hebei Kungfu win.
The match finished 1–0, validating the model's directional assessment.
Thị trường được theo dõi so với kết quả toàn thời gian
Cấp dự đoán
F
Mỗi hàng so sánh mô hình trước trận đấu với kết quả toàn thời gian.
- Chợ Dự đoán Kết quả kết quả
- Tài / Xỉu 2.5 Tài 2.5 Xỉu 2.5 (1 mục tiêu) ✖ Không đúng
- Cả Hai Đội Đều Ghi Bàn BTTS Có Không ✖ Không đúng
- 1X2 Hebei Kungfu Hebei Kungfu ✔ Chính xác
- Thông tin tỷ số chính xác 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 1-0 ✔ Chính xác
Mô hình so với thị trường đóng cửa
| kết quả | Người mẫu | Thị trường đóng cửa | Sự khác biệt | Tín hiệu |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hebei Kungfu | 37.1% | 41.0% | -3.9 pp | Aligned |
| Draw | 29.6% | 30.2% | -0.6 pp | Aligned |
| Dalian Huayi | 33.3% | 28.8% | +4.5 pp | Aligned |
The model and closing market are broadly aligned, with probability differences below 5 percentage points.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
Sau toàn thời gian, độ nghiêng định hướng của mô hình khớp với kết quả (Hebei Kungfu win 1–0).
Market Assessment
The market and model are broadly aligned. Any small pricing gap likely reflects rounding or bookmaker margin, not a structural disagreement.
- Current pricing remains close to the model baseline.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Exact score 1–0 fell within the model's highlighted bins
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Over 2.5; match finished Under 2.5 (1 goals)
Market lesson
The model's directional lean matched the full-time result (Hebei Kungfu win 1–0).
Nhà cái cao cấp stake: người mới có thể dùng mã khuyến mãi FHn2uDc1. Đăng ký ngay
Dòng thời gian dự đoán
Dự đoán này chuyển từ dự báo sang đánh giá toàn thời gian như thế nào.
-
Oct 06, 2026 · 11:00 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Hebei Kungfu 37.0% · Draw 29.6% · Dalian Huayi 33.4%
- xG · Hebei Kungfu 1.34 — Dalian Huayi 1.26
-
Oct 06, 2026 · 11:10 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE20
- 1X2 odds · Hebei Kungfu 2.25 · Draw 3.05 · Dalian Huayi 3.20
- Implied 1X2 · Hebei Kungfu 41.0% · Draw 30.2% · Dalian Huayi 28.8%
- Bookmaker · draftkings
-
Oct 06, 2026 · 11:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Hebei Kungfu 2.25 · Draw 3.05 · Dalian Huayi 3.20
- Implied 1X2 · Hebei Kungfu 41.0% · Draw 30.2% · Dalian Huayi 28.8%
- Bookmaker · draftkings
-
Oct 06, 2026 · 11:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Hebei Kungfu win · 1–0
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Ảnh chụp lịch sử
Bị treo khi bắt đầu — kết quả đầu ra của mô hình như trước khi trận đấu bắt đầu.
Phán quyết lịch sử:
Observe
Quyết định lịch sử
No Primary Bet
kết quả
Validated
Số liệu trước trận đấu (bối cảnh lịch sử)
Độ tin cậy dự đoán
77/100
· High
- Validation: Pass
Chứng cớ
★★★★★
- No strong statistical edge
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
Market Compatibility
77/100
Betting Confidence
80/100
Validation Report
Immutable Snapshot
Closing Odds
3.2
AI Fair Odds
—
CLV
Pending
Final Result
Hebei Kungfu win · Hebei Kungfu 1–0 Dalian Huayi
Prediction
✔ Correct
Decision Grade
F
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Xem lại câu hỏi thường gặp
- Dự đoán đó chính xác đến mức nào?
- Trang này xếp loại các thị trường định hướng (1X2, Trên/Dưới 2,5, BTTS) so với kết quả toàn thời gian. Mức dự đoán phản ánh có bao nhiêu thị trường được theo dõi phù hợp với thực tế.
- Độ chính xác xG đo lường điều gì?
- Độ chính xác của xG so sánh hồ sơ bàn thắng dự kiến trước trận đấu của mô hình với tỷ số thực tế — chứ không phải liệu mọi thị trường có thành công hay không. Đánh giá mang tính định hướng mạnh mẽ có thể cùng tồn tại với điểm chính xác xG vừa phải.
- Tại sao tỷ số chính xác không được dự đoán?
- Các kết quả có tỷ số chính xác là các kết quả có xác suất thấp ngay cả khi mô hình đọc tốt hồ sơ trận đấu. Chúng tôi nêu bật các thùng điểm cao nhất cho ngữ cảnh; thiếu dòng chính xác không làm mất hiệu lực của đánh giá định hướng.
- Điều này có cải thiện bản ghi AI không?
- Mỗi trận đấu kết thúc sẽ được ghi vào hệ thống xác thực của chúng tôi. Tỷ lệ trúng tổng hợp và nghiên cứu CLV được xuất bản riêng - trang này là đường dẫn kiểm tra mỗi trận đấu.
Dự đoán chỉ nhằm mục đích thông tin. Luôn đánh bạc có trách nhiệm và trong giới hạn của bạn. Hiệu suất trong quá khứ không đảm bảo kết quả trong tương lai.
Chưa có briefing AI cho trận này. Sau khi nâng cấp máy chủ, chạy lại «Tạo tỷ lệ hàng loạt» để tạo bản tóm tắt.
View technical JSON
{
"bundle_version": 1,
"content_hash": "6f33308ce5fc9f23d14081394c7e04bc06c1c0d0616a7b3a9c38ac7ddeb2d0a2",
"decision_algo_version": "2.5.0",
"facts": {
"ai_fp": {
"away_predicted_xg": 1.26,
"away_win_prob": 0.3331,
"away_win_prob_posterior": null,
"bayes_applied": 0,
"btts_no_prob": 0.455,
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"dc_rho": -0.13,
"draw_prob": 0.2963,
"draw_prob_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_away": 3.0,
"fair_odds_away_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_draw": 3.38,
"fair_odds_draw_posterior": null,
"fair_odds_home": 2.7,
"fair_odds_home_posterior": null,
"home_predicted_xg": 1.34,
"home_win_prob": 0.3706,
"home_win_prob_posterior": null,
"over_25_prob": 0.482,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under_25_prob": 0.518
},
"api_prediction": {
"advice": "Combo Double chance : Hebei Kungfu or draw and -3.5 goals",
"main_pick_display": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"percent_away": "10%",
"percent_draw": "45%",
"percent_home": "45%",
"winner_name": "Hebei Kungfu"
},
"away_xg": 1.26,
"betting_insight": {
"bet_label": "Hebei Kungfu",
"confidence": null,
"main_pick_meta": {
"confidence": "low",
"display_text": "No Strong Winner Bet",
"edge": -0.0397,
"edge_gap": 0.0371,
"market": "1X2",
"market_prob": 0.4103,
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"pick_type": "no_strong",
"probabilities": {
"away": 33.3,
"draw": 29.6,
"home": 37.1
},
"reason": "No clear edge in 1X2 market",
"selection": null,
"selection_name": null
},
"market_comparison": [
{
"affi_link": "",
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"odd": 2.26
}
],
"risk_color": null,
"risk_key": null,
"stacked_market": null,
"value_bet": {
"best_odds": 2.26,
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"display_market": "Hebei Kungfu Win",
"is_value": false,
"label": "Home",
"market_fair_odds": 2.44,
"market_odds": 2.26,
"model_odds": 2.7,
"overround": 7.8,
"prob_edge": -7.2,
"value_pct": -16.3,
"value_rating": "no_value"
}
},
"betting_markets": {
"btts": {
"away_clean_sheet": 5,
"away_failed_to_score": 7,
"away_played": 24,
"away_score_rate": 71.6,
"home_clean_sheet": 7,
"home_failed_to_score": 10,
"home_played": 24,
"home_score_rate": 73.8,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"pick": "Yes",
"pick_prob": 54.5,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": false,
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
"correct_score": {
"away_expected": 1.26,
"home_expected": 1.34,
"scores": [
{
"away": 1,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"away": 0,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 10.0
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 0,
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.4
},
{
"away": 1,
"home": 2,
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.4
},
{
"away": 2,
"home": 1,
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 7.9
}
],
"source": "xG"
},
"double_chance": {
"options": [
{
"key": "1X",
"label": "Hebei Kungfu or Draw",
"prob": 66.7
},
{
"key": "12",
"label": "Hebei Kungfu or Dalian Huayi",
"prob": 70.4
},
{
"key": "X2",
"label": "Draw or Dalian Huayi",
"prob": 62.9
}
],
"pick_key": "12",
"pick_label": "Hebei Kungfu or Dalian Huayi",
"pick_prob": 70.4
},
"match_winner": {
"away_pct": 33.3,
"draw_pct": 29.6,
"home_pct": 37.1,
"lean_key": "home",
"lean_label": "Hebei Kungfu"
},
"over_under": {
"api_hint": "-3.5",
"avg_total": 2.6,
"away_avg_scored": 1.3,
"confidence": "low",
"home_avg_scored": 0.9,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"pick": "Over 2.5",
"pick_prob": 51.8,
"source": "xG_dc",
"strong_pick": true,
"total_expected": 2.6,
"under_prob": 51.8
},
"prob_source": "poisson",
"value_bet_enhanced": {
"bookmaker_id": 0,
"bookmaker_name": "Pinnacle",
"edge": 9.2,
"implied_prob": 30.5,
"is_value": true,
"label": "Away",
"market": "Dalian Huayi Win",
"model_prob": 33.3,
"odds": 3.28
}
},
"closing_line_bundle": {
"has_data": false
},
"correct_score_insight": {
"best_value": null,
"lean_card": {
"diff_pp": -2.9,
"ev": -0.1875,
"has_edge": false,
"label": "1-1",
"market_odds": 6.5,
"market_prob": 0.1538,
"market_prob_pct": 15.4,
"model_prob": 0.125,
"model_prob_pct": 12.5,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"status_key": "no_value"
},
"most_likely": {
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
"top5": [
{
"label": "1-1",
"prob": 12.5
},
{
"label": "1-0",
"prob": 10.0
},
{
"label": "0-1",
"prob": 9.4
},
{
"label": "2-1",
"prob": 8.4
},
{
"label": "1-2",
"prob": 7.9
}
]
},
"home_xg": 1.34,
"homepage_pick": null,
"market_cards": [
{
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2098,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.1,
"edge": 0.0094,
"edge_pp": 0.9,
"market_prob": 0.437,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2098,
"best_odd": 2.1,
"edge": 0.0094,
"ev": -0.0625,
"implied_prob": 0.437,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.4464
},
"p_final": 0.4464,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 4.5,
"raw_signal_ev": 0.0122,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0625,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2308,
"best_odd": 1.63,
"edge": -0.0104,
"ev": -0.0992,
"implied_prob": 0.563,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.5526
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.0556,
"ev_over_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 5.6,
"text": "+5.6%"
},
"ev_under": -0.1349,
"ev_under_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -13.5,
"text": "-13.5%"
},
"featured": true,
"id": "ou_2_5",
"max_ev": 0.0556,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over_prob": 48.2,
"sort_key": 10200.04,
"tier": "best",
"under_prob": 51.8,
"value_side": "over"
},
{
"decision": "small_edge",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.21,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.825,
"edge": 0.0093,
"edge_pp": 0.9,
"market_prob": 0.5007,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.545,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.21,
"best_odd": 1.83,
"edge": -0.0093,
"ev": -0.1033,
"implied_prob": 0.4993,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.49
},
"p_final": 0.51,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"raw_edge_pp": 4.4,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.0054,
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0693,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.21,
"best_odd": 1.825,
"edge": 0.0093,
"ev": -0.0693,
"implied_prob": 0.5007,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.51
}
},
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.131,
"ev_no_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -13.1,
"text": "-13.1%"
},
"ev_yes": 0.0083,
"ev_yes_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": 0.8,
"text": "+0.8%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "btts",
"max_ev": 0.0083,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no_prob": 45.5,
"sort_key": 5206.64,
"tier": "lean",
"value_side": "yes",
"yes_prob": 54.5
},
{
"authority_action": "no_bet",
"authority_note": "Neither side shows a decisive model\u2013market alignment yet.",
"consensus_odds": 2.26,
"decision": "no_bet",
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"ev": -0.1108,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -11.1,
"text": "-11.1%"
},
"featured": false,
"id": "1x2",
"implied_prob": 0.4103,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"max_ev": -0.0266,
"max_ev_display": {
"capped": false,
"raw_pct": -2.7,
"text": "-2.7%"
},
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"raw_edge_display": "-4.0 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -4.0,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1627,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-16.3%",
"show_primary_label": false,
"side_label": "Hebei Kungfu",
"sort_key": 1793.35,
"tier": "bad_ev"
},
{
"featured": false,
"id": "correct_score",
"sort_key": 817.5,
"tier": "risk",
"top_label": "1-1",
"top_prob": 12.5
}
],
"market_intelligence": {
"betting_signal": {
"alert_breadth": "",
"alert_breadth_note": "",
"alert_move": "",
"alert_team": "",
"alert_title": "Sharp Money Alert",
"divergence_pp": 0.0,
"has_alert": false,
"hero_edge_pp": null,
"hero_label": "",
"market_prob_pct": null,
"market_team": "Hebei Kungfu",
"model_prob_pct": 37.1,
"model_team": "Hebei Kungfu",
"show": true,
"status_icon": "\u2713",
"status_key": "aligned",
"status_label": "Reliable prediction",
"status_line": "Direction aligned; check pricing gap separately",
"steam_score": null,
"steam_subtitle": "",
"steam_tier": "",
"title": "Betting Signal"
},
"decision_chain": {
"academy_links": [
{
"key": "steam",
"read_min": 4,
"title": "What Is a Steam Move?",
"url": "/academy/betting-market/what-is-a-steam-move/en"
},
{
"key": "clv_pending",
"read_min": 3,
"title": "Why CLV Matters More Than Win Rate",
"url": "/academy/clv/why-clv-matters-more-than-win-rate/en"
}
],
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "neutral",
"gap_pp": 4.0,
"key": "neutral",
"label": "Neutral",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 4.0,
"summary": "Neither side shows a decisive model\u2013market alignment yet."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "neutral",
"gap_pp": 4.0,
"key": "neutral",
"label": "Neutral",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 4.0,
"summary": "Neither side shows a decisive model\u2013market alignment yet."
},
"alignment_key": "neutral",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0556,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.0938,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.2,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 5.2,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 64,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Hebei Kungfu at 37.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 41.0%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Hebei Kungfu as the value side (37.0%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "No decisive market conflict on direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 4.0,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "No decisive market alignment yet",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Hebei Kungfu",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Hebei Kungfu \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.27 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +9% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1528724 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.27 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +5.6% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +5.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +5.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.2/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +5.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.2/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "61 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "64 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "neutral"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+5.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Neither side shows a decisive model\u2013market alignment yet.",
"Decision strength: 3.2/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +9% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 61,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Neither side shows a decisive model\u2013market alignment yet.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1108,
"consensus_ev_display": "-11.1%",
"consensus_odds": 2.26,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.4103,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"raw_edge_display": "-4.0 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -4.0,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4424778761061947,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1627,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-16.3%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -0.7,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.08 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.08
}
}
},
"bet_status": "no_bet",
"books_breadth_display": "4/9",
"breadth_ratio": 0.4444444444444444,
"evidence": {
"score": 55,
"signals": [
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "statistical_edge",
"label": "No strong statistical edge",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "market_agreement",
"label": "Market has already priced much of the edge",
"status": "caution"
},
{
"icon": "\u25cb",
"key": "steam",
"label": "Sharp steam detected",
"status": "neutral"
},
{
"icon": "!",
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation pending",
"status": "caution"
}
],
"stars": 2,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"forecast_reliability": {
"breakdown": [
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation: Pending",
"tone": "ok"
}
],
"parts": {
"alignment": 25.0,
"data_quality": 12.0,
"market_coverage": 4.4,
"steam_coherence": 7.0,
"validation": 8.0
},
"score": 61,
"stars": 3,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"lean_gap_pp": 0.0,
"market_agreement": "unknown",
"max_gap_pp": 0.0,
"model_calibration": {
"away_xg": 1.26,
"calibration_status": "ok",
"deviation_pct": -1.0,
"elevated": false,
"home_xg": 1.34,
"impact_note": "",
"league_avg_xg": 1.35,
"peak_xg": 1.34,
"status_label": "Within typical league range",
"summary": "Home xG 1.34 \u00b7 Away xG 1.26 \u00b7 League avg 1.35 \u00b7 Peak deviation -1%",
"title": "Model Calibration Check"
},
"move_is_drift": false,
"mv_status": "pending",
"odds_delta_pct": 0.0,
"steam_conflicts": null,
"steam_move_display": "+0.0%",
"steam_team": "Hebei Kungfu",
"suppress_execution": false,
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 64,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 80,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 37,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 80,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"verdict": {
"agree_note": "Neither side shows a decisive model\u2013market alignment yet.",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "neutral",
"gap_pp": 4.0,
"key": "neutral",
"label": "Neutral",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 4.0,
"summary": "Neither side shows a decisive model\u2013market alignment yet."
},
"authority": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "neutral",
"gap_pp": 4.0,
"key": "neutral",
"label": "Neutral",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 4.0,
"summary": "Neither side shows a decisive model\u2013market alignment yet."
},
"alignment_key": "neutral",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0556,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.0938,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.2,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 5.2,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 64,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Hebei Kungfu at 37.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 41.0%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Hebei Kungfu as the value side (37.0%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "No decisive market conflict on direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 4.0,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "No decisive market alignment yet",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Hebei Kungfu",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Hebei Kungfu \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.27 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +9% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1528724 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.27 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +5.6% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +5.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +5.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.2/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +5.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.2/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "61 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "64 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "neutral"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+5.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Neither side shows a decisive model\u2013market alignment yet.",
"Decision strength: 3.2/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +9% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 61,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Neither side shows a decisive model\u2013market alignment yet.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1108,
"consensus_ev_display": "-11.1%",
"consensus_odds": 2.26,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.4103,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"raw_edge_display": "-4.0 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -4.0,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4424778761061947,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1627,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-16.3%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -0.7,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.08 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.08
}
}
},
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"subline": "Neither side shows a decisive model\u2013market alignment yet.",
"tier": "observe"
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Hebei Kungfu 1.34 xG vs Dalian Huayi 1.26 \u2192 Hebei Kungfu 37.1%",
"Market Steam: Hebei Kungfu +0.0%"
],
"one_liner": "Model and market both lean Hebei Kungfu with no major conflict.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"edge_rows": [
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 37.06,
"label": "Hebei Kungfu",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "home"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 29.63,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "draw"
},
{
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob": 33.31,
"label": "Dalian Huayi",
"market_prob": null,
"market_type": "1x2",
"outcome": "away"
},
{
"edge_pp": 4.41,
"fair_prob": 48.2,
"label": "Over 2.5",
"market_prob": 43.79,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "over"
},
{
"edge_pp": -4.41,
"fair_prob": 51.8,
"label": "Under 2.5",
"market_prob": 56.21,
"market_type": "ou25",
"outcome": "under"
},
{
"edge_pp": 4.29,
"fair_prob": 54.5,
"label": "BTTS Yes",
"market_prob": 50.21,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "yes"
},
{
"edge_pp": -4.29,
"fair_prob": 45.5,
"label": "BTTS No",
"market_prob": 49.79,
"market_type": "btts",
"outcome": "no"
}
],
"edge_snapshot": {},
"fair_source": "poisson_pipeline",
"fair_vs_market": {
"closing_capture": "",
"closing_footnote": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations.",
"comparison_available": false,
"comparison_disabled": false,
"comparison_summary": "",
"degraded_note": "",
"divergence_guard": {
"divergence_level": "aligned",
"edge_status": "unknown",
"max_gap_pp": 0.0,
"suppress_hero": false,
"suppress_value_language": false
},
"divergence_label": "",
"divergence_level": "aligned",
"divergence_level_label": "Aligned",
"divergence_note": "",
"divergence_tier": "aligned",
"edge_label": "",
"edge_label_key": "",
"fair_confidence": "medium",
"fair_confidence_label": "Medium",
"fair_source_note": "Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations.",
"forecast_assessment": {
"favourite_class": "Balanced match",
"favourite_label": "Hebei Kungfu",
"forecast_certainty_tier": "low",
"headline": "Balanced match",
"market_agreement_label": "\u2014",
"market_direction": {
"label": "No clear directional signal",
"positive": null
},
"market_prob_pct": 41.0,
"model_prob_gap_display": "-3.9 percentage points",
"model_prob_gap_pp": -3.9,
"model_prob_pct": 37.1,
"outcome_separation_tier": "low",
"paragraphs": [],
"pricing_convergence": {
"gap_display": "-3.9 percentage points",
"gap_pp": -3.9,
"label": "High",
"label_key": "mi_fa_pricing_high"
},
"reliability_headline": "Limited reliability",
"reliability_icon": "!",
"reliability_score": 61,
"reliability_tier": "limited",
"summary": "The model and market both lean Hebei Kungfu, but neither indicates a dominant favourite. Draw and Dalian Huayi remain plausible \u2014 this is a relatively open match.",
"tier": "balanced",
"title": "Prediction Assessment",
"validation_label": "Pending",
"value_split": {
"execution_confidence": {
"label": "Betting Confidence",
"score": 64,
"tier": "moderate",
"tier_label": "Moderate"
},
"market_compatibility": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 80,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"model_edge_strength": {
"label": "Model Signal Strength",
"score": 37,
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"model_value": {
"label": "Market Compatibility",
"note": "Price proximity vs model (inverse of pp gap) \u2014 not the same as a Primary go-ahead. Read alongside Decision Strength and Alignment.",
"score": 80,
"tier": "high",
"tier_label": "High"
},
"recommendation": {
"action": "no_bet",
"label": "No Primary Bet"
}
},
"why": {
"action_line": "Compare model lean with current best odds before sizing any bet.",
"bullets": [
"Model: Hebei Kungfu 1.34 xG vs Dalian Huayi 1.26 \u2192 Hebei Kungfu 37.1%",
"Market Steam: Hebei Kungfu +0.0%"
],
"one_liner": "Model and market both lean Hebei Kungfu with no major conflict.",
"title": "Why?"
}
},
"forecast_certainty": {
"note": "Three outcomes remain closely bunched \u2014 treat as a relatively open match.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"forecast_certainty_label": "Low",
"has_market_probs": false,
"hero_edge_pp": null,
"hero_label": "",
"hero_side": null,
"market_activity": "No meaningful directional movement yet.",
"market_agreement": "unknown",
"market_agreement_label": "\u2014",
"market_interpretation": {},
"market_narrative": {},
"market_source": "closing_1x2",
"max_gap_pp": 0.0,
"model_validation": {
"score_label_key": "mi_mv_pending",
"status": "pending"
},
"model_validation_label": "Pending",
"outcome_separation": {
"breakdown": [
"No outcome exceeds 50% on the 1X2 grid.",
"Top two 1X2 outcomes within 3.8 percentage points."
],
"lead_gap_pp": 3.8,
"max_prob_pct": 37.1,
"note": "How spread out the model 1X2 probabilities are \u2014 crowded splits mean no single outcome dominates. Not accuracy vs the market.",
"tier": "low",
"tier_label": "Low"
},
"outcome_separation_label": "Low",
"overall_assessment": {
"badge_class": "aligned",
"largest_gap_label": "",
"largest_gap_pp": null,
"lead": "The model and closing market are broadly aligned.",
"level": "aligned",
"max_gap_pp": 0.0,
"title": "Broadly Aligned"
},
"rows": [
{
"difference_pp": null,
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob_pct": 37.06,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Hebei Kungfu",
"market_prob_pct": null,
"side": "home",
"signal_key": "",
"signal_label": ""
},
{
"difference_pp": null,
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob_pct": 29.63,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Draw",
"market_prob_pct": null,
"side": "draw",
"signal_key": "",
"signal_label": ""
},
{
"difference_pp": null,
"edge_pp": null,
"fair_prob_pct": 33.31,
"is_hero": false,
"label": "Dalian Huayi",
"market_prob_pct": null,
"side": "away",
"signal_key": "",
"signal_label": ""
}
],
"status": "unknown",
"status_label": "\u2014",
"steam_note": "",
"unavailable_note": ""
},
"interpretation": {
"has_conflict": "",
"paragraphs": [
"The statistical model leans Hebei Kungfu (37.1%).",
"The model and market both lean Hebei Kungfu, but neither indicates a dominant favourite. Draw and Dalian Huayi remain plausible \u2014 this is a relatively open match."
],
"show": true,
"title": "OddsGPT Interpretation"
},
"lifecycle": {
"closing_implied_pct": null,
"closing_odds": null,
"closing_reason": "Expected before kickoff",
"closing_status": "waiting",
"closing_status_label": "Waiting",
"clv_pending": true,
"clv_pp": null,
"clv_reason": "",
"clv_status": "pending",
"context": "match",
"current_stage": "market_monitoring",
"current_stage_detail": "",
"current_stage_label": "Market monitoring",
"entry_implied_pct": 45.45,
"entry_odds": 2.2,
"match_phase": "upcoming",
"match_phase_detail": "",
"match_phase_display": "Upcoming",
"match_phase_label": "Upcoming",
"model_validation_label": "Pending",
"model_validation_status": "pending",
"stages": [
{
"detail": "",
"id": "forecast_generated",
"label": "Prediction Generated",
"status": "done"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "market_detected",
"label": "Market Compared",
"status": "active"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "model_validated",
"label": "Validation Passed",
"status": "pending"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "closing_recorded",
"label": "Closing Recorded",
"status": "pending"
},
{
"detail": "",
"id": "clv_evaluated",
"label": "CLV Evaluated",
"status": "pending"
}
]
},
"market_move_intelligence": {
"show": false
},
"market_overview": {
"breadth_display": "4/9",
"current_odds": 2.2,
"move_display": "+0.0%",
"open_odds": 2.2,
"pick_team": "Hebei Kungfu",
"steam_score": 13,
"steam_team_name": "Hebei Kungfu",
"steam_tier": "C"
},
"premium_teaser": {},
"show": true
},
"match": {
"at2.away_team_slug": "dalian-huayi",
"away_expected_goals": null,
"away_goal_display": null,
"away_team_display_name": "Dalian Huayi",
"away_team_id": 5652,
"away_team_logo": "/static/teams/5652.webp",
"away_team_name": "Dalian Huayi",
"away_team_public_id": "0xfCifLDrO1NIJ",
"away_team_slug": "dalian-huayi",
"country_code": "CN",
"country_display_name": "China",
"country_flag": "/static/images/country/cn.svg",
"country_id": 32,
"country_name": "China",
"fixture_id": 1528724,
"goals_away": null,
"goals_home": null,
"home_expected_goals": null,
"home_goal_display": null,
"home_team_country": "China",
"home_team_display_name": "Hebei Kungfu",
"home_team_id": 17264,
"home_team_logo": "/static/teams/17264.webp",
"home_team_name": "Hebei Kungfu",
"home_team_public_id": "5sp3hTbP1fw1hM",
"home_team_slug": "hebei-kungfu",
"ht.home_team_slug": "hebei-kungfu",
"league_country": "China",
"league_country_display": "China",
"league_display_name": "League One Trung Qu\u1ed1c",
"league_id": 170,
"league_logo": "/static/leagues/170.webp",
"league_name": "League One Trung Qu\u1ed1c",
"league_public_id": "0Z8NZOcuHfzq60",
"league_season": 2026,
"match_date": "2026-10-06 11:30:00",
"public_id": "5GuPnGqZ0efcBg",
"score_fulltime_away": null,
"score_fulltime_home": null,
"score_penalty_away": null,
"score_penalty_home": null,
"status_long": "Not Started",
"status_short": "NS",
"venue_city": "Shijiazhuang",
"venue_name": "Yutong International Sports Center"
},
"match_decision": {
"confidence": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_md_max_1x2_under_50",
"pred_conf_md_top_two_close",
"pred_conf_md_line_above_ev"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (open contest) (\u22121.0)",
"Top two outcomes relatively close in probability (\u22120.5)",
"At least one tracked line above +EV threshold (+0.5)"
],
"score": 6.0
},
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "market_first_p15",
"away": {
"alpha": 0.2771,
"best_odd": 3.28,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": 0.0141,
"ev": -0.0266,
"implied_prob": 0.2827,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2827,
"draw": 0.307,
"home": 0.4103
},
"model_prob": 0.3335,
"p_final": 0.2968
},
"draw": {
"alpha": 0.295,
"best_odd": 3.02,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0033,
"ev": -0.0826,
"implied_prob": 0.307,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2827,
"draw": 0.307,
"home": 0.4103
},
"model_prob": 0.296,
"p_final": 0.3038
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"alpha": 0.4232,
"best_odd": 2.26,
"calibration": {
"active": false,
"hook": "CALIBRATE_1X2_P_FINAL"
},
"edge": -0.0168,
"ev": -0.1108,
"implied_prob": 0.4103,
"joint_probs": {
"away": 0.2827,
"draw": 0.307,
"home": 0.4103
},
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"p_final": 0.3935
}
},
"1x2_outlier": {
"1x2_ev_mode": "legacy_max_odd",
"away": {
"best_odd": 3.28,
"edge": 0.0286,
"ev": 0.0938,
"implied_prob": 0.3049,
"model_prob": 0.3335
},
"draw": {
"best_odd": 3.02,
"edge": -0.0351,
"ev": -0.1061,
"implied_prob": 0.3311,
"model_prob": 0.296
},
"ev_available": true,
"home": {
"best_odd": 2.26,
"edge": -0.0719,
"ev": -0.1626,
"implied_prob": 0.4425,
"model_prob": 0.3705
}
},
"btts": {
"alpha_no": 0.21,
"alpha_yes": 0.21,
"best_no_odd": 1.91,
"best_yes_odd": 1.85,
"btts_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"edge_no": -0.0429,
"edge_yes": 0.0429,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_no": -0.131,
"ev_no_risk_adj": -0.1033,
"ev_yes": 0.0083,
"ev_yes_risk_adj": -0.0693,
"implied_no": 0.4979,
"implied_yes": 0.5021,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.21,
"best_odd": 1.83,
"edge": -0.0093,
"ev": -0.1033,
"implied_prob": 0.4993,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.49
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.21,
"best_odd": 1.825,
"edge": 0.0093,
"ev": -0.0693,
"implied_prob": 0.5007,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.51
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"p_final_no": 0.49,
"p_final_yes": 0.51,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
},
"ou25": {
"alpha_over": 0.2098,
"alpha_under": 0.2308,
"best_over_odd": 2.19,
"best_under_odd": 1.67,
"consensus_over_odd": 2.1,
"consensus_under_odd": 1.63,
"edge_over": 0.0441,
"edge_under": -0.0441,
"ev_available": true,
"ev_over": 0.0556,
"ev_over_risk_adj": -0.0625,
"ev_under": -0.1349,
"ev_under_risk_adj": -0.0992,
"implied_over": 0.4379,
"implied_over_mf": 0.437,
"implied_under": 0.5621,
"implied_under_mf": 0.563,
"market_first": {
"available": true,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2098,
"best_odd": 2.1,
"edge": 0.0094,
"ev": -0.0625,
"implied_prob": 0.437,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.4464
},
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2308,
"best_odd": 1.63,
"edge": -0.0104,
"ev": -0.0992,
"implied_prob": 0.563,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.5526
}
},
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"ou_ev_mode": "market_first_available",
"p_final_over": 0.4464,
"p_final_under": 0.5526,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"reliability": "medium"
}
},
"match_regime": {
"action": "avoid",
"code": "no_edge",
"execution_line_key": "pred_regime_exec_no_actionable",
"insight_line_key": "pred_regime_insight_minor_inefficiency",
"stake_mult": 0.0,
"use_split_strip": true
},
"match_tier": "no_bet",
"min_ev": 0.02,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"variance_flag": false
},
"unified_decision": {
"actionable_ev_threshold": 0.02,
"algorithm": {
"enabled_since": "2026-05-26",
"game_typing_module": true,
"version": "2.5.0"
},
"balanced_alternative": null,
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0556,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.0938,
"best_tracked_ev": 0.0556,
"confidence": 5.0,
"decision_confidence_v1": {
"breakdown": [
"pred_conf_v1_primary_line",
"pred_conf_v1_max_1x2_under_50"
],
"breakdown_resolved": [
"Primary line identified (+1.0)",
"Max 1X2 prob under 50% (no dominant 1X2) (\u22121.0)"
],
"breakdown_v2": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.2,
"score_v1_legacy": 5.0,
"score_v2_pre_penalty": 5.2,
"strength_v2": true
},
"decision_strength_v2": {
"breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"score": 3.2,
"score_pre_penalty": 5.2
},
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution": {
"1x2_dominant": false,
"1x2_open_contest": true,
"grade": "A",
"stake_factor": 1.0
},
"favourite_misaligned_1x2": {
"active": false,
"gap": null,
"side": null
},
"final_action": "no_bet",
"final_decision": {
"action": "no_bet",
"alignment": {
"direction_aligned": false,
"direction_key": "neutral",
"gap_pp": 4.0,
"key": "neutral",
"label": "Neutral",
"model_strong": false,
"pricing_aligned": true,
"pricing_key": "high",
"probability_gap_pp": 4.0,
"summary": "Neither side shows a decisive model\u2013market alignment yet."
},
"alignment_key": "neutral",
"best_consensus_ev": 0.0556,
"best_outlier_ev": 0.0938,
"confidence_band": "Moderate\u2013Low",
"decision_strength": 3.2,
"decision_strength_v1": 5.0,
"decision_strength_v2": 5.2,
"decision_type": "NO_SIGNAL",
"execution_confidence": 64,
"extreme_disagreement": false,
"final_verdict_audit": {
"action": "Monitor closing market and validate with CLV.",
"action_label": "Action",
"decision": "No Primary Bet",
"is_primary": false,
"snapshot": "The Decision Model estimates Hebei Kungfu at 37.0%, compared with a no-vig market probability of 41.0%.",
"why": [
{
"text": "Decision Model identifies Hebei Kungfu as the value side (37.0%)",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "No decisive market conflict on direction",
"tone": "ok"
},
{
"text": "Market quality / price reliability is insufficient for Primary",
"tone": "bad"
},
{
"text": "Model confidence reduced due to calibration uncertainty",
"tone": "bad"
}
],
"why_label": "Decision Summary"
},
"gap_pp": 4.0,
"gates_failed": [
"Reliability below 65"
],
"has_top_pick": true,
"headline": "No Primary Bet",
"hero_mode": "default",
"icon": "\u25cb",
"label": "No Primary Bet",
"market_signal": "No decisive market alignment yet",
"model_conflict_detail": null,
"model_lean": "Hebei Kungfu",
"no_primary_reasons": {
"all_triggered": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"calibration_mode": "soft",
"codes": [
"market_quality",
"calibration_risk"
],
"label": "Reason",
"other_factors": [
{
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
}
],
"other_label": "Other factors",
"primary": {
"code": "market_quality",
"detail": "Price reliability is weak (thin coverage, outlier quote, or low book agreement).",
"name": "Market Quality Risk",
"short": "Market Quality Risk",
"tone": "warn"
},
"secondary": {
"code": "calibration_risk",
"detail": "Confidence reduced because model assumptions exceed the normal range.",
"name": "Calibration Risk",
"short": "Calibration Risk",
"tone": "danger"
},
"version": "v1"
},
"outlier_detected": true,
"outlier_excluded_panel": "Excluded top quotes (audit row \u2014 never Primary): #1 \u00b7 market OU_2_5 \u00b7 side Hebei Kungfu \u00b7 decimal odds ~2.27 (derived from model% \u00d7 (1+EV)) \u00b7 EV +9% \u00b7 book: not captured on live render (see odds history / admin snapshot) \u00b7 captured: \u2014 \u00b7 audit_ref: fixture=1528724 \u00b7 snapshot=live-render \u00b7 odds\u22482.27 \u00b7 reason=thin|single-book|\u0394EV\u22653.0%EV \u00b7 book=admin-only \u00b7 trigger: outlier EV \u2212 consensus EV \u2265 +3.0% EV (not probability pp) AND thin/single-book style \u00b7 consensus used +5.6% EV. Excluded quotes cannot clear Primary.",
"primary_allowed": false,
"primary_block_explain": {
"entries": [
{
"key": "positive_ev",
"label": "Consensus EV +5.6% meets Primary gate (\u2265+5.0%)",
"ok": true
},
{
"key": "gate",
"label": "Reliability below 65",
"ok": false
}
],
"lean_ev_threshold_pct": 2.0,
"primary_ev_threshold_pct": 5.0,
"subtitle": "Primary needs consensus EV \u2265 +5.0% plus reliability/execution/calibration gates (Decision Strength is explain-only). Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only \u2014 not default Primary sizing).",
"title": "Why not Primary?"
},
"primary_gate_checklist": "Gate checklist: Consensus EV +5.6% \u2705 (need \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration See checklist \u274c \u2192 Primary blocked. Decision Strength 3.2/10 (explain only, not a Primary gate). If you still act under hard block: example stake 0.10\u20130.20% bankroll (never Primary).",
"primary_gate_snapshot": "Primary Gate Snapshot: Consensus EV +5.6% (gate \u2265+5.0%) \u00b7 Calibration: See checklist \u2192 Primary blocked \u00b7 Decision Strength 3.2/10 (display only)",
"primary_gates": {
"items": [
{
"key": "extreme_gap",
"label": "Extreme gap",
"ok": true,
"value": "no"
},
{
"key": "xg_calibration",
"label": "xG calibration",
"ok": true,
"value": "warning"
},
{
"key": "reliability",
"label": "Rel",
"ok": false,
"value": "61 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "execution",
"label": "Exec",
"ok": false,
"value": "64 (\u226565)"
},
{
"key": "alignment",
"label": "Align",
"ok": true,
"value": "neutral"
},
{
"key": "consensus_ev",
"label": "ConsEV",
"ok": true,
"value": "+5.6% (\u2265+5.0%)"
},
{
"key": "top_pick",
"label": "Pick",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
},
{
"key": "validation",
"label": "Validation",
"ok": true,
"value": "true"
}
],
"passed": 6,
"total": 8
},
"primary_type": null,
"reasons": [
"Neither side shows a decisive model\u2013market alignment yet.",
"Decision strength: 3.2/10",
"Reliability below 65",
"Outlier price +9% EV detected \u2014 not used for Primary (consensus only)."
],
"reliability_score": 61,
"speed_read": "Speed read: Model Signal can look moderate/strong while Decision Strength stays low after calibration \u2014 Strength alone does not block Primary (v2.5+); still check reliability/execution/EV hard gates.",
"strength_v2_breakdown": [
"Base decision score (v1)",
"Consensus-line +EV",
"Low xG separation (league-average noise)"
],
"subline": "Neither side shows a decisive model\u2013market alignment yet.",
"thresholds": {
"extreme_gap_pp": 30.0,
"lean_min_consensus_ev": 0.02,
"lean_min_strength": 5.0,
"min_consensus_ev": 0.05,
"min_execution": 65,
"min_reliability": 65,
"min_strength": 7.0,
"source": "db",
"user_id": 2
},
"thresholds_source": "db",
"thresholds_user_id": 2,
"tier": "observe",
"validation_ok": true,
"value_context": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1108,
"consensus_ev_display": "-11.1%",
"consensus_odds": 2.26,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.4103,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"raw_edge_display": "-4.0 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -4.0,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4424778761061947,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1627,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-16.3%"
},
"version": "v2.5",
"xg_calibration": {
"block_value_alert": true,
"calibration_status": "warning",
"deviation_pct": -0.7,
"reasons": [
"Low xG separation gap=0.08 (noise / no edge)"
],
"recommended_action": "monitor",
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"uplift_away": null,
"uplift_home": null,
"xg_separation": {
"band": "flat",
"block_value_alert": true,
"separation_score": -20,
"strength_delta": -2.0,
"xg_gap": 0.08
}
}
},
"game_type": {
"label_zh": "\u5747\u8861\uff08\u5f00\u653e\u8d5b\u679c\uff09",
"scoring_type": "balanced",
"signals": {
"btts_yes_prob": 0.545,
"draw_prob": 0.296,
"max_1x2_prob": 0.3705,
"over_prob": 0.482,
"total_xg": 2.6,
"under_prob": 0.518,
"xg_diff": 0.08
},
"type": "balanced",
"typing_weights_enabled": true
},
"hero_display_pick": null,
"hero_mode": "default",
"longshot_picks": [],
"markets": {
"1x2": {
"consensus_odds": 2.26,
"decision": "no_bet",
"edge": -0.0168,
"ev": -0.1108,
"implied_prob": 0.4103,
"max_ev_side": "away",
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"side": "home",
"side_label": "Hebei Kungfu"
},
"btts": {
"decision": "small_edge",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.21,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 1.825,
"edge": 0.0093,
"market_prob": 0.5007,
"mode": "market_first_btts",
"model_prob": 0.545,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"no": {
"alpha": 0.21,
"best_odd": 1.83,
"edge": -0.0093,
"ev": -0.1033,
"implied_prob": 0.4993,
"model_prob": 0.455,
"p_final": 0.49
},
"p_final": 0.51,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0693,
"value_side": "yes",
"yes": {
"alpha": 0.21,
"best_odd": 1.825,
"edge": 0.0093,
"ev": -0.0693,
"implied_prob": 0.5007,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"p_final": 0.51
}
},
"edge": 0.0429,
"ev": 0.0083,
"implied_prob": 0.5021,
"model_prob": 0.545,
"side": "yes",
"value_side": "yes"
},
"ou_2_5": {
"decision": "value_bet",
"decision_layer": {
"alpha": 0.2098,
"available": true,
"consensus_odds": 2.1,
"edge": 0.0094,
"market_prob": 0.437,
"mode": "market_first_ou",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"n_bookmakers": 7,
"over": {
"alpha": 0.2098,
"best_odd": 2.1,
"edge": 0.0094,
"ev": -0.0625,
"implied_prob": 0.437,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"p_final": 0.4464
},
"p_final": 0.4464,
"prediction_confidence": "very_low",
"risk_adj_ev": -0.0625,
"under": {
"alpha": 0.2308,
"best_odd": 1.63,
"edge": -0.0104,
"ev": -0.0992,
"implied_prob": 0.563,
"model_prob": 0.518,
"p_final": 0.5526
},
"value_side": "over"
},
"edge": 0.0441,
"ev": 0.0556,
"implied_prob": 0.4379,
"model_prob": 0.482,
"side": "over",
"value_side": "over"
}
},
"match_id": 1528724,
"match_regime": {
"action": "optional",
"actionable": true,
"clear_edge": false,
"code": "thin_edge",
"execution_line_key": null,
"insight_line_key": null,
"max_valid_ev": 0.0556,
"min_ev": 0.02,
"stake_mult": 0.25,
"use_split_strip": false
},
"match_tier": "value_game",
"no_clear_primary": false,
"probabilities": {
"away": 0.3335,
"draw": 0.296,
"home": 0.3705
},
"reason_codes": [
"no_ev_1x2"
],
"secondary_pick": null,
"secondary_picks": [],
"show_betting_primary_label": false,
"suppressed_primary": null,
"teams": {
"away": "Dalian Huayi",
"home": "Hebei Kungfu"
},
"top_pick": {
"composite_score": 0.018759,
"decision": "value_bet",
"ev": 0.0556,
"implied_prob": 0.4379,
"market": "ou_2_5",
"model_prob": 0.482,
"not_dominant": true,
"primary_strength": "clear",
"risk_band": "medium",
"risk_tier": "primary",
"side": "over",
"slot": "primary",
"speculative_primary": false
},
"valid_markets_count": 1,
"value_context_1x2": {
"consensus_ev": -0.1108,
"consensus_ev_display": "-11.1%",
"consensus_odds": 2.26,
"disagreement_label": "Normal",
"disagreement_level": "normal",
"implied_prob": 0.4103,
"is_extreme_disagreement": false,
"model_prob": 0.3705,
"raw_edge_display": "-4.0 percentage points",
"raw_edge_pp": -4.0,
"raw_implied_prob": 0.4424778761061947,
"raw_signal_ev": -0.1627,
"raw_signal_ev_display": "-16.3%"
}
}
},
"fixture_id": 1528724,
"generated_at_utc": "2026-10-06T11:00:00.436675+00:00",
"lang_id": "en"
}
Khám phá thêm nội dung dự đoán
Nhận dự đoán cao cấp cho Hebei Kungfu & Dalian Huayi!
Mở khóa phân tích chuyên sâu, mẹo cá cược độc quyền và dự đoán trận đấu với dịch vụ đăng ký cao cấp của chúng tôi.
Đăng ký ngay
League One Trung Quốc — Bảng xếp hạng
| # | Đội | Tr | T | H | B | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou E-Power | 24 | 16 | 6 | 2 | 54 |
| 2 | Guangxi Pingguo Haliao | 24 | 13 | 6 | 5 | 45 |
| 3 | Shenzhen Juniors | 24 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 44 |
| 4 | Nantong Zhiyun | 24 | 11 | 9 | 4 | 42 |
| 5 | Shaanxi Union | 24 | 10 | 6 | 8 | 36 |
| 6 | Yanbian Longding | 24 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 35 |
| 7 | Wuxi Wugou | 24 | 9 | 5 | 10 | 32 |
| 8 | Hebei Kungfu | 24 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 31 |
| 9 | Changchun Yatai | 24 | 10 | 3 | 11 | 29 |
| 10 | Ningbo Professional | 24 | 9 | 5 | 10 | 29 |
| 11 | Dalian Huayi | 24 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 29 |
| 12 | Suzhou Dongwu | 24 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 26 |
| 13 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 24 | 4 | 11 | 9 | 23 |
| 14 | Nanjing City | 24 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 21 |
| 15 | Meizhou Kejia | 24 | 7 | 3 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | Dongguan United | 24 | 2 | 7 | 15 | 13 |
| # | Đội | Tr | BT | BB | +/- | Đ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou E-Power | 24 | 48 | 20 | +28 | 54 |
| 2 | Guangxi Pingguo Haliao | 24 | 40 | 26 | +14 | 45 |
| 3 | Shenzhen Juniors | 24 | 39 | 25 | +14 | 44 |
| 4 | Shaanxi Union | 24 | 38 | 26 | +12 | 36 |
| 5 | Changchun Yatai | 24 | 37 | 40 | -3 | 29 |
| 6 | Wuxi Wugou | 24 | 36 | 29 | +7 | 32 |
| 7 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 24 | 35 | 46 | -11 | 23 |
| 8 | Nantong Zhiyun | 24 | 33 | 20 | +13 | 42 |
| 9 | Yanbian Longding | 24 | 33 | 27 | +6 | 35 |
| 10 | Dalian Huayi | 24 | 30 | 36 | -6 | 29 |
| 11 | Suzhou Dongwu | 24 | 28 | 33 | -5 | 26 |
| 12 | Ningbo Professional | 24 | 27 | 30 | -3 | 29 |
| 13 | Meizhou Kejia | 24 | 25 | 50 | -25 | 15 |
| 14 | Dongguan United | 24 | 24 | 49 | -25 | 13 |
| 15 | Hebei Kungfu | 24 | 22 | 25 | -3 | 31 |
| 16 | Nanjing City | 24 | 20 | 33 | -13 | 21 |
